The impact of HLA-DR mismatch status on retransplant-free survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome‒free survival among sensitized lung transplant recipients

The Impact of Prelung Transplant HLA Antibodies on Post-transplant Outcomes in Recipients With Autoimmune Lung Disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced lung disease who have HLA antibodies against potential donors have reduced opportunities for transplant. Not all HLA antibodies, however, have the same impact on post-transplant outcomes. It is unknown whether HLA antibodies arising in the context of autoimmune lung disease are associated with increased antibody mediated rejection (AMR) or bronchiolitis obliterans stage 1 (BOS1)-free survival.

METHODS

This study used retrospective data from SRTR to examine BOS1-free survival and AMR among sensitized recipients with autoimmune ILD compared to sensitization recipients with nonautoimmune ILD, accounting for other sources of sensitization such as pregnancy and blood transfusions. This study did not use organs from prisoners and participants were neither coerced nor paid.

RESULTS

Sensitized recipients with autoimmune ILD did not have differences in BOS1-free survival when adjusting for sensitizing exposures (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.70-1.16) or clinical covariates (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83-1.12). There was also no difference in AMR (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.04-3.52).

CONCLUSIONS

HLA antibodies arising in the context of autoimmune ILD do not appear to have a differential impact on BOS1-free survival or AMR. This provides further evidence that patients sensitized via autoimmune lung diseases do not require separate decision-making regarding HLA antibody status compared to the overall sensitized population.

Development and validation of primary graft dysfunction predictive algorithm for lung transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Accurate prediction of PGD risk could inform donor approaches and perioperative care planning. We sought to develop a clinically useful, generalizable PGD prediction model to aid in transplant decision-making.

METHODS

We derived a predictive model in a prospective cohort study of subjects from 2012 to 2018, followed by a single-center external validation. We used regularized (lasso) logistic regression to evaluate the predictive ability of clinically available PGD predictors and developed a user interface for clinical application. Using decision curve analysis, we quantified the net benefit of the model across a range of PGD risk thresholds and assessed model calibration and discrimination.

RESULTS

The PGD predictive model included distance from donor hospital to recipient transplant center, recipient age, predicted total lung capacity, lung allocation score (LAS), body mass index, pulmonary artery mean pressure, sex, and indication for transplant; donor age, sex, mechanism of death, and donor smoking status; and interaction terms for LAS and donor distance. The interface allows for real-time assessment of PGD risk for any donor/recipient combination. The model offers decision-making net benefit in the PGD risk range of 10% to 75% in the derivation centers and 2% to 10% in the validation cohort, a range incorporating the incidence in that cohort.

CONCLUSION

We developed a clinically useful PGD predictive algorithm across a range of PGD risk thresholds to support transplant decision-making, posttransplant care, and enrich samples for PGD treatment trials.

Impact of Spousal Donation on Postoperative Outcomes of Living-donor Lobar Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The effect of human leukocyte antigen mismatches between donors and recipients on postoperative outcomes of lung transplantation remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed adult recipients receiving living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) to examine the difference in de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development and clinically diagnosed unilateral chronic lung allograft dysfunction per graft (unilateral CLAD) between lung grafts donated by spouses (nonblood relatives) and nonspouses (relatives within the third degree). We also investigated the difference in prognoses between recipients undergoing LDLLTs including spouse donors (spousal LDLLTs) and not including spouse donors (nonspousal LDLLTs).

METHODS

In this study, 63 adult recipients undergoing LDLLTs (61 bilateral and 2 unilateral LDLLTs from 124 living donors) between 2008 and 2020 were enrolled. The cumulative incidence of dnDSAs per lung graft was calculated, and prognoses were compared between recipients undergoing spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of both dnDSAs and unilateral CLAD in grafts donated by spouses was significantly higher than that in grafts donated by nonspouses (5-y incidence of dnDSAs: 18.7% versus 6.4%, P = 0.038; 5-y incidence of unilateral CLAD: 45.6% versus 19.4%, P = 0.011). However, there were no significant differences in the overall survival or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival between recipients undergoing spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs ( P > 0.99 and P = 0.434, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no significant differences in prognoses between spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs, more attention should be paid to spousal LDLLTs because of the higher development rate of dnDSAs and unilateral CLAD.

The Highly Sensitized Recipient: Pretransplant and Posttransplant Considerations

Highly sensitized patients, who are often black and Hispanic women, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant and are at higher risk for prolonged waitlist time and waitlist death. In this review, the authors discuss strategies for improving access to transplant in this population, including risk stratification of crossing pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, based on antibody characteristics. The authors also review institutional protocols, such as perioperative desensitization, for tailoring transplant immunosuppression in the highly sensitized population. The authors conclude with suggestions for future research, including development of novel donor-specific antibody-directed therapeutics.

Liquid Biopsy, a Potential New Detection Method in Heart Allograft Rejection

Allografts rejection remains the most important reason causing allograft dysfunction in heart transplantation recipients. Currently, the golden standard for detecting graft rejection is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). As a new noninvasive technique, liquid biopsy emerges along with the great developments of droplet-based digital PCR and the various optimizations of next-generation sequencing technologies, which is also cheaper than EMB. This review introduces several types of liquid biopsy and its application in heart transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen antibody sensitization, lung transplantation, and health equity

Women with advanced lung disease, particularly Black and Hispanic women, are more likely than other patients to have anti-human leukocyte (HLA) antibodies against potential donors. Sensitized patients, especially those who are highly sensitized, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant or to be considered candidates for mechanical circulatory support. They are also at higher risk for waitlist death. Institutional variability in approach to HLA antibody screening and pre-transplant management creates barriers to transplant that disproportionately impact Black and Hispanic women. At the same time, our understanding of the clinical significance of pre-transplant antibodies lags behind the sophistication of our screening assays. The lack of national data on pre- and post-transplant HLA antibody characteristics hinders research into strategies to mitigate concerns about these antibodies and to improve access to lung transplant among sensitized patients. Ongoing work should be done to identify clinically higher risk antibodies, to develop better strategies for safely crossing antibodies at the time of transplant, and to model changes in lung allocation to give priority to sensitized patients for a HLA antibody-antigen compatible donors. These priorities mandate a commitment to collaborative, multicenter research and to real time translation of results to clinical practice and allocation policy.

Lung Transplantation Outcomes after Crossing Low-Level Donor Specific Antibodies Without Planned Augmented Immunosuppression

It is unknown whether some donor specific antibodies (DSA) can be crossed at the time of lung transplant without desensitization or augmented induction immunosuppression. This study assessed whether crossing low-level pre-transplant DSA (defined as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 1000-6000) without augmented immunosuppression is associated with worse retransplant-free or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival. Of the 458 included recipients, low-level pre-transplant DSA was crossed in 39 (8.6%) patients. The median follow-up time was 2.2 years. There were 15 (38.5%) patients with Class I DSA and 24 (61.5%) with Class II DSA. There was no difference in adjusted overall retransplant-free survival between recipients where pre-transplant DSA was and was not crossed (HR: 0.98 (95% CI = 0.49-1.99), p = 0.96). There was also no difference in CLAD-free survival (HR: 0.71 (95% CI = 0.38-1.33), p = 0.28). There was no difference in Grade 3 PGD at 72 hours (OR: 1.13 (95% CI = 0.52-2.48), p = 0.75) or definite or probable AMR (HR: 2.22 (95% CI = 0.64-7.61), p = 0.21). Lung transplantation in the presence of low-level DSA without planned augmented immunosuppression is not associated with worse overall or CLAD-free survival among recipients with intermediate-term follow-up. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.