Long-term adult congenital heart disease survival after heart transplantation: A restricted mean survival time analysis

Long-term outcomes of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: The impact of single-ventricle versus biventricular physiology

Objective

Congenital heart disease is a risk factor for mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation; however, the impact of preoperative circulation type and primary congenital heart disease diagnosis remains poorly delineated.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with adult congenital heart disease aged 16 years or more who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution between 2008 and 2022. Patients were categorized as having single-ventricle or biventricular circulation. The primary end point was 5-year post-transplant survival.

Results

Sixty-one patients with adult congenital heart disease (single-ventricle: n = 26 [42.6%], biventricular: n = 35 [57.4%]) underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at 33.7 [interquartile range, 19.1-48.7] years. The most common congenital heart disease diagnosis was hypoplastic left heart syndrome (n = 11, 42.3%) in the single-ventricle group and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (n = 7, 20.0%) in the biventricular group. Twenty-four patients previously underwent Fontan palliation. At transplant, patients in the single-ventricle group were younger (18.5 [interquartile range, 17.6-32.3] years vs 45.0 [interquartile range, 33.0-52.2] years, P < .001) and more likely to have biopsy-proven cirrhosis (46.2% vs 14.3%, P = .01) and protein-losing enteropathy (42.3% vs 2.9%, P < .001). Patients in the single-ventricle group also had longer bypass times (223.4 ± 65.3 minutes vs 187.4 ± 59.5 minutes, P = .03) and longer durations of mechanical ventilatory support (3.5 [interquartile range, 2.0-6.0] days vs 1.0 [interquartile range, 1.0-2.0] days, P < .001). Operative mortality was comparable (11.5% vs 8.6%, P = 1). Median follow-up was 6.0 [interquartile range, 2.4-10.0] years. Five-year survival was worse in the single-ventricle group (66.0% ± 10.0% vs 91.3% ± 4.8%, P = .03), as was freedom from major rejection (58.3% ± 10.2% vs 84.0% ± 6.6%, P = .02). In univariable analysis, hypoplastic left heart syndrome and Fontan circulation were risk factors for post-transplant mortality (hypoplastic left heart syndrome: hazard ratio, 5.0, P < .001; Fontan: hazard ratio, 3.5, P = .03).

Conclusions

Adult patients with congenital heart disease undergoing heart transplant with single-ventricle physiology experienced a more complicated post-transplant course, with worse long-term survival and freedom from rejection. Multicenter studies are required to guide orthotopic heart transplantation decision-making in this complex cohort.

Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Transplant: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy

The rate of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is rising, but the 1-year mortality posttransplantation remains higher than non-ACHD patients. A robust pretransplant assessment and operative and postoperative planning can mitigate much of the perioperative risk. Importantly, ACHD patients who survive the first year have significantly better 10-year survival compared with non-ACHD patients. The current allocation system gives ACHD patients a relatively high priority, but providers must use the prespecified exception requests for higher status, especially for patients with the Fontan circulation. It is vital that ACHD patients with end-stage heart failure are cared for at centers with ACHD subspecialty care.

Failing with Cyanosis-Heart Failure in End-Stage Unrepaired or Partially Palliated Congenital Heart Disease

Heart failure in cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) is diagnosed clinically rather than relying solely on ventricular function assessments. Patients with cyanosis often present with clinical features indicative of heart failure. Although myocardial injury and dysfunction likely contribute to cyanotic CHD, the primary concern is the reduced delivery of oxygen to tissues. Symptoms such as fatigue, lassitude, dyspnea, headaches, myalgias, and a cold sensation underscore inadequate tissue oxygen delivery, forming the basis for defining heart failure in cyanotic CHD. Thus, it is pertinent to delve into the components of oxygen delivery in this context.

Determinants of survival following heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Adult patients surviving with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is growing. We examine the factors associated with heart transplant outcomes in this challenging population with complex anatomy requiring redo-surgeries.

METHODS

We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing-Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database and analyzed 35,952 heart transplants from January 1st, 2000, to September 30th, 2018. We compared transplant characteristics for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 14,236), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (n = 20,676), and ACHD (n = 1040). Mean follow-up was 6.20 ± 4.84 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards analysis were used to analyze survival data.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis confirmed that ACHD was associated greater in-hospital death compared to ICM (HR = 0.54, P < 0.001) and NICM (HR = 0.46, P < 0.001). Notable factors associated with increased mortality were history of cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.11, P = 0.026), prior history of malignancy (HR = 1.12, P = 0.006), pre-transplant biventricular support (HR = 1.12, P = 0.069), postoperative stroke (HR = 1.47, P < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (HR = 1.71, P < 0.001). ACHD transplants had a longer donor heart ischemic time (P < 0.001) and trend towards more deaths from primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.07). In-hospital deaths were more likely with ACHD and use of mechanical support such as use of right ventricular assist device (HR = 2.20, P = 0.049), biventricular support (HR = 1.62, P < 0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR = 2.36, P < 0.001). Conditional survival after censoring hospital deaths was significantly higher in ACHD (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Heart transplant in ACHD is associated with a higher post-operative mortality given anatomical complexity but a better long-term conditional survival. Normothermic donor heart perfusion may improve outcomes in the ACHD population by reducing the impact of longer ischemic times.

Adequacy of Size Matching With Predicted Heart Mass Ratio in Diverse Types of Cardiomyopathies

Predicted heart mass ratio (PHMr) has been proposed as an optimal size metric in the selection of a donor heart for transplant; however, it is not known if the same size matching criteria pertains uniformly to all types of cardiomyopathies. Heart transplant recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry database were categorized into 6 groups based on the type of cardiomyopathy, dilated, coronary artery disease, hypertrophic, restrictive, valvular and adult congenital heart disease. Patients in each group of etiology were stratified based on the PHMr into 5 groups: severely undersized <0.86, moderately undersized 0.86 to 0.94, matched 0.95 to 1.04, moderately oversized 1.05 to 1.24, and severely oversized >1.25. The survival and cause of death of patients in each etiology group were reviewed. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database from January 1987 to July 2021 included 53,573 patients who received a heart transplant. Compared with patients with size matched hearts, recipients with dilated (hazard ratio 1.17, p = 0.001) and valvular (hazard ratio 1.79, p = 0.032) cardiomyopathy who had an undersized heart with PHMr <0.86 had decreased survival. In addition, the survival of patients with hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy and adult congenital heart disease was not affected by size matching based on the PHMr (0.601 and 0.079, respectively, p = 0.873). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that the size matching criteria based on PHMr may not be uniform to all patients across various etiologies of cardiomyopathy. Therefore, the data can be used to increase the acceptance rate of donor hearts, particularly, for patients with hypertrophic, restrictive cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease in which size matching is less significant for survival outcome.

Survival After Cardiac Transplantation in Adults With Single-Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Without large-scale analyses of adults with single-ventricle congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing heart transplantation, little evidence exists to guide listing practices and patient counseling.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate survival after heart transplantation in adults with single and biventricular CHD and compare it to that of non-CHD transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this 15-year (2005-2020) retrospective analysis, outcome-blinded investigators used probability-linkage to merge the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data sets.

RESULTS

Of 382 adult (≥18 years of age) heart transplant recipients with CHD, 185 (48%) had single-ventricle physiology. Compared to biventricular CHD, single-ventricle patients showed significantly reduced survival at 1 (80% vs 91%; HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.40-4.49; P = 0.002) and 10 years (54% vs 71%; HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.38-3.18; P < 0.001). Among patients who survived the first post-transplantation year, biventricular CHD patients exhibited similar 10-year survival as single-ventricle patients, except for those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (79% vs 71%; HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.85-2.92; P = 0.15). Additionally, biventricular CHD transplant recipients showed significantly better 10-year conditional survival compared to their non-CHD counterparts (79% vs 68%; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adult CHD transplant recipients, single-ventricle physiology correlated with higher short-term mortality. However, 10-year conditional survival was similar for biventricular and most single-ventricle CHD patients, and notably better for biventricular CHD patients compared to non-CHD heart transplant recipients. These findings have significant implications towards patient selection and listing strategies, easing concerns related to heart transplantation in adults with CHD and destigmatizing most subtypes of single-ventricle CHD.

Advanced heart failure and heart transplantation in adult congenital heart disease in the current era

BACKGROUND

Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) may undergo heart transplantation (HTx) despite increased risk of poor short-term outcomes due to factors including surgical complexity and antibody sensitization. We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ACHD in the current era referred for HTx at a single high-volume transplant center.

METHODS

From 2010-2020, 37 ACHD patients were evaluated for HTx. ACHD HTx recipients were compared to non-ACHD HTx recipients matched for age, sex, listing status, and prior cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients with ACHD, 8 (21.6%) were declined for HTx. Of 29 ACHD patients listed, 19 (65.5%) underwent HTx. Compared with non-ACHD HTx controls, the ACHD HTx recipients had more treated cellular (21.1% vs 15.8%, p = 0.010) and antibody-mediated (15.8% vs 10.5%, p = 0.033) rejection. There was no difference in hospital readmission or allograft vasculopathy at 1 year. There was a nonsignificant higher 1-year mortality in ACHD HTx recipients (21.1% vs 7.9%, p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

At a high-volume transplant center, ACHD patients undergoing HTx appear to have a marginally higher risk of rejection, but no significant increase in 1-year mortality. With careful selection and management, HTx for patients with ACHD may be feasible in the current era. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.