Serial right heart catheter assessment between balloon pulmonary angioplasty sessions identify procedural factors that influence response to treatment

Usefulness of risk assessment tools in predicting hemodynamic outcome after balloon pulmonary angioplasty: a comparative analysis

OBJECTIVES

Several parameters of widely used risk assessment tools for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have been linked to hemodynamic outcomes of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Therefore, we aimed to determine whether these risk assessment tools could be used to predict hemodynamic outcomes following BPA.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 139 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension who had undergone BPA at Center for Pulmonary Vascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (Beijing, China). We compared the accuracies of seven well-validated risk assessment tools for predicting hemodynamic outcomes following BPA. A favorable hemodynamic outcome was defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure < 30 mmHg at follow-up.

RESULTS

The baseline risk profiles varied significantly among the risk assessment tools. The US Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management risk scales and the French risk assessment tools rated most patients as high-risk, while the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) series and laboratory examination-based risk scales categorized most patients as having intermediate-risk profile. COMPERA 2.0 (4-strata) exhibited the highest predictive power among all risk stratifications. Noninvasive risk stratification (COMPERA 2.0 [3-strata]) showed a comparable predictive ability to that of invasive risk stratification (COMPERA 1.0) (area under the curve 0.649 vs. 0.648). Moreover, incorporating diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and tricuspid regurgitation velocity into COMPERA 2.0 (4-strata) further enhanced its predictive power (net reclassification index 0.153, 95% confidence interval 0.009-0.298, p = 0.038). Additionally, this refined COMPERA version had a high calibration accuracy (slope 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Although the risk strata distribution varied among different risk assessment tools, the proportion of patients achieving favorable hemodynamics decreased with the escalation of risk stratification in most models. The well-validated risk assessment tools for PAH could also predict hemodynamic outcomes following BPA, and the refined COMPERA 2.0 model exhibited the highest predictive ability among these. Applying risk assessment tools before BPA can facilitate early identification of patients in need of closer monitoring and more intensive interventions, contributing to a better prognosis after BPA.

How Would I Treat My Own Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in the Perioperative Period?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) results from an incomplete resolution of acute pulmonary embolism, leading to occlusive organized thrombi, vascular remodeling, and associated microvasculopathy with pulmonary hypertension (PH). A definitive CTEPH diagnosis requires PH confirmation by right-heart catheterization and evidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease on imaging studies. Surgical removal of the organized fibrotic material by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest represents the treatment of choice. One-third of patients with CTEPH are not deemed suitable for surgical treatment, and medical therapy or interventional balloon pulmonary angioplasty presents alternative treatment options. Pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with technically operable disease significantly improves symptoms, functional capacity, hemodynamics, and quality of life. Perioperative mortality is <2.5% in expert centers where a CTEPH multidisciplinary team optimizes patient selection and ensures the best preoperative optimization according to individualized risk assessment. Despite adequate pulmonary artery clearance, patients might be prone to perioperative complications, such as right ventricular maladaptation, airway bleeding, or pulmonary reperfusion injury. These complications can be treated conventionally, but extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been included in their management recently. Patients with residual PH post-PEA should be considered for medical or percutaneous interventional therapy.

Efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients with pulmonary comorbidity

Background

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an established treatment for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but its efficacy in CTEPH patients with a pulmonary comorbidity has not been well-studied. Here, we compared post-BPA outcomes between CTEPH patients with and without chronic pulmonary disease at baseline and analyzed predictors of BPA success.

Methods

From August 2017 to October 2022, 62 patients with inoperable CTEPH who underwent BPA were consecutively enrolled and grouped based on the presence of a pulmonary comorbidity at baseline. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography, pulmonary function tests, and right heart catheterization. Pre- and post-BPA data were evaluated to identify factors that influence the success of BPA.

Results

Among the 62 CTEPH patients, BPA was considered successful in 50 patients and unsuccessful in 12 patients. Responders to BPA had better exercise capacity and right heart function at baseline, but no differences in hemodynamic or respiratory function were detected between the groups. In CTEPH patients with chronic pulmonary disease (n = 14), BPA significantly improved mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart function parameters. Only CTEPH patients without chronic pulmonary disease (n = 48) exhibited significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance and respiratory function. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary comorbidity at baseline was independently associated with the efficacy of BPA.

Conclusions

BPA provided significantly improvements in hemodynamics and right heart function in CTEPH patients, independent of pulmonary comorbidity at baseline. However, pulmonary comorbidity can negatively impact post-BPA outcomes.

'Fear, uncertain, tired…...' psychological distress among pulmonary hypertension patients: a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered health care for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) is important and requires an understanding of patient experiences. However, there is a lack of approaches to examine what's the effects and how the disease impact patients' psychological well-beings.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews with PH patient representatives to understand patient psychological experiences and inform patient-centered research and care. Participants were chosen from a tertiary hospital located in northwest China. 20 patients with PH who be treated at the hospital (13 participants were women, aged 18-74 years) were strategically selected and individually interviewed. We used qualitative analysis to identify themes relating to existential psychological distress that would clarify the nature of such concerns.

RESULTS

We found that patients experience tremendous psychological distress throughout the treatment process. Four categories that describe patients' psychological experiences emerged: burden of PH treatment, fear and uncertainty about the disease, frustration in social and family role, and lack of recognition of the condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Existential concerns are salient in PH and involve the experience of loss and disruptions to the sense of self and relationships. Healthcare practitioners must work more in collaboration to detect patients' need for support and to develop the patient's own skills to manage daily life. The PH teams should tailor interventions to provide emotional, informational and instrumental support and guidance to patients.

Optimal short-term outcomes in balloon pulmonary angioplasty: the minimum frequency of three sessions annually

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is typically performed in a sequential manner.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the lowest frequency of BPA for patients who could not reach treatment goals in a short period.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 186 BPA-treated patients diagnosed with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. According to the accumulative number of performed BPA sessions or treated pulmonary vessels or the ratio of the number of treated pulmonary vessels/the number of baseline lesions (T/P) prior to the initial occurrence of clinical outcome or censored date, we divided patients into different groups. The principal outcome was clinical worsening.

RESULTS

After stratifying patients by the number of performed BPA sessions, most baseline parameters were comparable among groups. During follow-up, 31 (16.7%) of 186 patients experienced clinical worsening. The 6-month cumulative clinical worsening-free survival rates of ⩾2 performed sessions group were significantly higher than that of 1 performed session group. The 12-month cumulative rates of clinical worsening-free survival exhibited a declining pattern in the subsequent sequence: ⩾3, 2, and 1 performed BPA sessions, and this trend persisted when follow-up time exceeded 12 months. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative clinical worsening-free survival rates were comparable between patients with 3 and ⩾4 performed BPA sessions. Similar results were also observed when stratifying patients by the accumulative number of treated pulmonary vessels (⩽8, 9-16, ⩾17) and T/P (⩽0.789, 0.790-1.263, ⩾1.264).

CONCLUSION

To achieve optimal short-term outcomes, patients might need to undergo ⩾2 BPA sessions or have ⩾9 pulmonary vessels treated or have T/P ⩾0.790 within 6 months, and undergo ⩾3 BPA sessions or have ⩾17 pulmonary vessels treated or have T/P ⩾1.264 within 12 months.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects >1.2 million Americans annually. Although the clinical outcomes and economic burdens of VTE have been well described, the impact of VTE on patients' health status has yet to be summarized. This systematic review summarizes how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in VTE to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed/MEDLINE was queried for literature published through March 2023 using PROMs in a population of patients with VTE. Studies were excluded if the reference was an editorial, review, or case report, or if the study included patients with conditions other than VTE. Qualitative analyses were performed. After screening and exclusion, 136 references were identified; 5 described PROM development, 20 focused on PROM validation, and 111 used PROMs in outcomes research. The most used generic PROMs were the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, and the most common disease-specific PROMs were the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire. PROMs were used to quantify the changes in health status after diagnosis, characterize the trajectory of subsequent improvement, and identify drivers of continued impairments in health status like postthrombotic syndrome and postpulmonary embolism syndrome. PROMs were also used to investigate the impact of novel treatment modalities on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the many benefits of PROM use, including quantifying changes in health status with treatment, capturing patients' experiences with the treatment itself, and identifying complications of VTE. Incorporating PROMs into VTE care will be an essential component of evaluating the effectiveness of novel therapies and should lead to improved shared decision-making for patients with VTE.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting hemodynamic response to balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) can effectively alleviate pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Identifying predictors of unfavorable hemodynamic response to BPA is essential to guide clinical practice. Therefore, our objective was to construct and validate a nomogram to facilitate clinicians predicting hemodynamic response to BPA.

METHODS

Patients with CTEPH and underwent BPA from May 2018 to April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Favorable hemodynamic response to BPA was defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≤30 mmHg and/or a reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance ≥30 % at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were included. At baseline, patients with favorable hemodynamic response had significantly lower proportion of occlusive lesions (11.11 % vs. 26.32 %, P = 0.017), higher diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (63.77 % ± 14.10 % vs. 59.11 % ± 11.78 %, P = 0.039), and better cardiac morphology than counterparts. LASSO regression and random forest were used to construct prediction models respectively. The LASSO regression model demonstrated better predictive ability and accuracy than the random forest model, as evidenced by higher area under curve (0.745 vs. 0.740) and lower Brier score (0.192 vs. 0.195). A nomogram was constructed based on the LASSO regression model, consisting of right ventricular end-diastolic diameter/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, number of treated pulmonary vessels and proportion of occlusion lesions. High predictive ability of the LASSO model was preserved in validation (C index 0.744).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study constructed a nomogram with high accuracy in predicting BPA hemodynamic outcome, which could facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.

Monographic Issue on Pulmonary Hypertension: Medical and Interventional Treatment for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism. The reasons why clots do not resorb are incompletely understood, but the result is partial or complete fibrothrombotic obstruction of pulmonary arteries. A secondary microvasculopathy aggravates the pulmonary hypertension (PH) as a consequence of high flow and shear stress in the nonoccluded arteries. The treatment of CTEPH has long been purely surgical, but many patients were inoperable because of inaccessible lesions or severe comorbidities. Alternatives were developed, including medical therapy and more recently balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Depending on the generation of the obstructed vessels, the treatment will be surgical, up to the (sub)segmental level, or by BPA for more distal vessels. PH drugs are used to treat the microvasculopathy. The current paper describes the therapeutic management of inoperable patients: the medical approach with PH drugs used in mono- or combination therapy; the proper use of anticoagulants in CTEPH; the technique, indications, and results at short- and long-term of BPA; the multimodal approach for inoperable patients combining PH drugs and BPA; and the effects of rehabilitation. It shows the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the disease.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: realising the potential of multimodal management

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism. Important advances have enabled better understanding, characterisation, and treatment of this condition. Guidelines recommending systematic follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism, and the insight that CTEPH can mimic acute pulmonary embolism on initial presentation, have led to the definition of CTEPH imaging characteristics, the introduction of artificial intelligence diagnosis pathways, and thus the prospect of easier and earlier CTEPH diagnosis. In this Series paper, we show how the understanding of CTEPH as a sequela of inflammatory thrombosis has driven successful multidisciplinary management that integrates surgical, interventional, and medical treatments. We provide imaging examples of classical major vessel targets, describe microvascular targets, define available tools, and depict an algorithm facilitating the initial treatment strategy in people with newly diagnosed CTEPH based on a multidisciplinary team discussion at a CTEPH centre. Further work is needed to optimise the use and combination of multimodal therapeutic options in CTEPH to improve long-term outcomes for patients.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a clinical consensus statement of the ESC working group on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function

The current treatment algorithm for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) as depicted in the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) includes a multimodal approach of combinations of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and medical therapies to target major vessel pulmonary vascular lesions, and microvasculopathy. Today, BPA of >1700 patients has been reported in the literature from centers in Asia, the US, and also Europe; many more patients have been treated outside literature reports. As BPA becomes part of routine care of patients with CTEPH, benchmarks for safe and effective care delivery become increasingly important. In light of this development, the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function has decided to publish a document that helps standardize BPA to meet the need of uniformity in patient selection, procedural planning, technical approach, materials and devices, treatment goals, complications including their management, and patient follow-up, thus complementing the guidelines. Delphi methodology was utilized for statements that were not evidence based. First, an anatomical nomenclature and a description of vascular lesions are provided. Second, treatment goals and definitions of complete BPA are outlined. Third, definitions of complications are presented which may be the basis for a standardized reporting in studies involving BPA. The document is intended to serve as a companion to the official ESC/ERS guidelines.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty outcomes in patients previously treated by pulmonary endarterectomy surgery are inferior to those of inoperable patients

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) may not achieve full clearance of vascular obstructions in patients with more distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) may be indicated to treat these residual vascular lesions. We compared whether patients post-PEA (PP) treated by BPA derived similar benefit to those who had inoperable CTEPH (IC), and assessed predictors of BPA response after surgery. We treated 109 patients with BPA-89 with IC and 20 PP. Serial right heart catheterization performed at baseline (immediately before BPA) and 3 months after completing BPA, compared pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) as well as change in WHO functional class and 6-minute walk distance. We also assessed the impact of total thrombus tail length (TTTL) from photographed PEA surgical specimens and PP computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-quantified residual disease burden on BPA response. PP and IC groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographics, baseline hemodynamics or procedural characteristics. However, IC derived greater hemodynamic benefit from BPA: ΔPVR (-27.9 ± 20.2% vs. -13.9 ± 23.9%, p < 0.05) and ΔmPAP (-17.1 ± 14.4% vs. -8.5 ± 18.0%, p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between pre-BPA PVR and TTTL (r = -0.47, p < 0.05) which persisted post-BPA. PVR, mPAP, WHO FC and 6MWD were not improved significantly post-BPA in PP patients. BPA response was not related to TTTL terciles or CTPA-quantified residual disease burden. Patients PP experienced inferior response to BPA, despite similar baseline and procedural characteristics to IC. BPA does not abolish the relationship between TTTL and postsurgical PVR in PP patients, suggesting that BPA is less effective in treating residual PH after surgery in an experienced surgical center.

Refined Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Initial Results of U.S. Regional Program

Objectives

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Background

BPA is rapidly evolving therapeutic option for patients with nonsurgical CTEPH. There are few US studies that have reported on the outcomes of this novel therapeutic option.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of CTEPH patients that underwent BPA at Temple University Hospital. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) after BPA as compared to baseline and the primary safety endpoint was the rate of hemoptysis within 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included death, WHO functional class, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). We used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with a hemodynamic and functional response.

Results

A total of 211 BPA sessions were performed on 77 patients (average 2.7 ± 1.7 sessions/patient). After BPA the mean PVR improved by 26% (P<0.001) while the mean 6MWD improved by 71.7 meters (P <0.001) and WHO functional class improved by one functional class (P <0.001). Ten sessions (4.7%) were complicated by hemoptysis. The independent factors associated with a improved functional and hemodynamic response included the pre-procedural use of riociguat, reduce baseline PA compliance and > 3 BPA sessions per patient.

Conclusion

This single center study from the US showed that BPA with refined techniques in patients with CTEPH was safe and was associated with significant improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and functional capacity.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Clinical Outcomes

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare major vessel pulmonary vascular disease that is characterised by fibrotic obstructions deriving from an organised clot. Recent advances in treatments for CTEPH have significantly improved outcomes. Apart from classical surgical pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and vasodilator drugs that were tested in randomised controlled trials of non-operable patients are now available. In Europe, CTEPH affects males and females equally. In the first European CTEPH Registry, women with CTEPH underwent pulmonary endarterectomy less frequently than men, especially at low-volume centres. In Japan, CTEPH is more common in females and is predominantly treated by BPA. More data on gender-specific outcomes are expected from the results of the International BPA Registry (NCT03245268).

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition in which an organic thrombus remains in the pulmonary artery (PA) even after receiving anticoagulation therapy for more than 3 months and is complicated by pulmonary hypertension (PH), leading to right-sided heart failure and death. CTEPH is a progressive pulmonary vascular disease with a poor prognosis if left untreated. The standard treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), which is usually performed only in specialized centers. In recent years, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and drug therapy for CTEPH have also shown good results. This review discusses the complex pathogenesis of CTEPH and presents the standard of care, PEA, as well as a new device called BPA, which is showing remarkable progress in efficacy and safety. Additionally, several drugs are now demonstrating established evidence of efficacy in treating CTEPH.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed from inception to June 2022 to identify studies assessing BPA for CTEPH. Outcomes of interest included the following functional and hemodynamic measures: (a) six-minute walk distance (6MWD), (b) New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, (c) World Health Organization (WHO)-Functional Class status, (d) cardiac index (CI), (e) mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), (f) mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), and (g) pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Subgroup analysis was also performed for BPA in post-pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) patients. All reported BPA-related complications were also recorded. Forty unique studies with a total of 1763 patients were identified for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

All functional and hemodynamic parameters improved significantly following BPA; 6MWD increased 70 m (95% CI 58-82; P < 0.001), NYHA class improved by - 0.9 classes (95% CI - 1.0 to - 0.8; P < 0.001), WHO-FC class improved by - 1 classes ((95% CI - 1.2 to - 0.9; P < 0.001), CI increased 0.26 L/min/m² (95% CI 0.17-0.35; P < 0.001), mPAP decreased - 13.2 mmHg (95% CI - 14.7 to - 11.8; P < 0.001), mRAP decreased - 2.2 mmHg (95% CI - 2.8 to - 1.6; P < 0.001), and PVR decreased - 311 dyne/cm/s^-5 (95% CI - 350 to - 271; P < 0.001). Meta-analysis of patients who underwent BPA for persistent pulmonary hypertension post-PEA demonstrated significant improvements in 6MWD, WHO-FC, PVR and mPAP. Most common complications included lung injury (8.16%), hemoptysis (7.07%) and vessel injury (5.05%).

CONCLUSION

BPA represents a safe and effective treatment option for select individuals with CTEPH with significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters, improved exercise tolerance and a relatively low risk of major complications.

Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of changes in hemodynamics and functional capacity

The treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging option for inoperable patients. Comparisons of the hemodynamic and functional outcome between these treatments are scarce. In this single-center observational cohort study, we compared hemodynamics by right heart catheterization and peak oxygen consumption before and 5 months (±14 days) after either PEA or BPA. Comprehensive evaluation and selection for PEA or BPA was performed by an expert CTEPH team. Fourty-two and fourty consecutive patients were treated with PEA or BPA, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. Both PEA and BPA significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 46 ± 11 mmHg at baseline to 28 ± 13 mmHg at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 43 ± 12 mmHg to 31 ± 9 mmHg; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 686 ± 347 dyn s cm-5 at baseline to 281 ± 197 dyn s cm-5 at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 544 ± 322 dyn s cm-5 to 338 ± 180 dyn s cm-5; p < 0.001), with significantly lower reductions for both parameters in the former group. However, cardiopulmonary exercise testing revealed no significant between group differences in exercise capacity. Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide at baseline was the only follow-up predictor for peak VO2. In our study, PEA reduced pulmonary pressures more than BPA did, but similar improvements were observed for exercise capacity. Thus, while long term data after BPA is lacking, BPA treated CTEPH patients can expect physical gains in line with PEA.

Acute lung injury after balloon pulmonary angioplasty results in a similar haemodynamic response and possible clinical advantage at follow-up

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common but poorly defined and understood complication of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Little data are available on the medium term clinical outcomes of BPA complicated by ALI. We analyzed per-procedure data from 282 procedures in 109 patients and per-patient data from 85 patients. Serial right heart catheterization at baseline, after each BPA and at 3-month follow-up measured pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), and cardiac output (CO). ALI (ALI+) was identified by chest radiography alone (ALI_r+) or in association with hypoxia clinically (ALI_cr+). Procedural predictors of ALI and patient outcomes at 3-months were compared no ALI (ALI-). ALI+ occurred in 17/282 (6.0%) procedures (ALI_cr+: 2.5%, ALI_r+: 3.5%). Prevailing haemodynamics (PVR: p < 0.01; mPAP: p < 0.05) at a procedural and patient level, as well as number of BPA sessions (p < 0.01), total number of vessels (p < 0.05), and occlusions (p < 0.05) treated at a patient level predicted ALI+. Those with ALI had greater percentage improvement in ΔCAMPHOR symptoms score (ALI+: -63.5 ± 35.7% (p < 0.05); ALI_cr+: -84.4 ± 14.5% (p < 0.01); ALI-: -27.2 ± 74.2%) and ΔNT-proBNP (ALI_cr+: -78.4 ± 11.9% (p < 0.01); ALI-: -42.9 ± 36.0%) at follow-up. There was no net significant difference in haemodynamic changes in ALI+ versus ALI- at follow-up. ALI is predicted by haemodynamic severity, number of vessels treated, number of BPA sessions, and treating occlusive disease. ALI in this cohort was associated with a clinical advantage at follow-up.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty versus riociguat in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (MR BPA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (inoperable CTEPH) include balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and riociguat. However, these two treatment options have not been compared prospectively. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of BPA and riociguat in patients with inoperable CTEPH.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted at four high-volume CTEPH centres in Japan. Patients aged 20-80 years with inoperable CTEPH (mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 to &lt;60 mm Hg and pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg) and WHO functional class II or III were randomly assigned (1:1) to BPA or riociguat via a computer program located at the registration centre using a minimisation method with biased-coin assignment. In the BPA group, the aim was for BPA to be completed within 4 months of the initial date of the first procedure. BPA was repeated until mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased to less than 25 mm Hg. The frequency of BPA procedures depended on the difficulty and number of the lesions. In the riociguat group, 1·0 mg riociguat was administered orally thrice daily. When the systolic blood pressure was maintained at 95 mm Hg or higher, the dose was increased by 0·5 mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 2·5 mg thrice daily; dose adjustment was completed within 4 months of the date of the first dose. The primary endpoint was change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure from baseline to 12 months, measured in the full analysis set (patients who were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the study treatments, and had at least one assessment after randomisation). BPA-related complications and indices related to clinical worsening were recorded throughout the study period. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study period and evaluated in the safety analysis set (patients who were enrolled and randomely assigned to one of the study treatments, and had received part of or all the study treatments). This trial is registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; jRCTs031180239) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 8, 2016, and Oct 31, 2019, 61 patients with inoperable CTEPH were enrolled and randomly assigned to BPA (n=32) or riociguat (n=29). Patients in the BPA group underwent an average of 4·7 (SD 1·6) BPA procedures. In the riociguat group, the mean maintenance dose was 7·0 (SD 1·0) mg/day at 12 months. At 12 months, mean pulmonary arterial pressure had improved by -16·3 (SE 1·6) mm Hg in the BPA group and -7·0 (1·5) mm Hg in the riociguat group (group difference -9·3 mm Hg [95% CI -12·7 to -5·9]; p&lt;0·0001). A case of clinical worsening of pulmonary hypertension occurred in the riociguat group, whereas none occurred in the BPA group. The most common adverse event was haemosputum, haemoptysis, or pulmonary haemorrhage, affecting 14 patients (44%) in the BPA group and one (4%) in the riociguat group. In 147 BPA procedures done in 31 patients, BPA-related complications were observed in 17 procedures (12%) in eight patients (26%).

INTERPRETATION

Compared with riociguat, BPA was associated with a greater improvement in mean pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with inoperable CTEPH at 12 months, although procedure-related complications were reported. These findings support BPA as a reasonable option for inoperable CTEPH in centres with experienced BPA operators, with attention to procedure-related complications.

FUNDING

Bayer Yakuhin.

TRANSLATION

For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Update on balloon pulmonary angioplasty for treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), a pulmonary vascular disease that is characterized by fibro-thrombotic material mechanically obliterating major pulmonary arteries, resulting in increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), progressive pulmonary hypertension (PH) combined with a microscopic pulmonary vasculopathy [1▪▪], right ventricular (RV) failure [2] and premature death.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from a most recent CTEPH European registry (2015 and 2016) suggest significantly improved survival [3▪] of CTEPH patients compared with survival in the eighties [4], or with data from 2007 and 2009 [5]. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is still the gold-standard therapy for CTEPH [6,7]. However, only around two thirds of all CTEPH patients are amenable to surgery [3▪,5]. Patients not suitable for PEA and treated conservatively have a poor prognosis [8]. BPA may have a role for this particular group of patients. [9-11]. Currently, BPA programs are available in many countries, with excellent results at expert centers [12-15,16▪,17,18▪▪]. Based on recent data, BPA seems to have a greater impact on symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement than medical therapy with riociguat alone [15].

SUMMARY

The evidence favoring BPA is growing, but there is still a lack of published controlled trials. In addition, treatment concepts including indication, technical performance, use of PH-targeted medication, and the concept of follow-up vary between centers. In addition, there is a significant learning curve impacting outcomes [13]. The data from the International BPA registry will provide answers for some of the open questions.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension previously operated by pulmonary endarterectomy

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty improved hemodynamics, walking distance, and World Health Organization functional class in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension not eligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (Non-PEA) and patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA (PEA). More mild complications were observed in PEA- compared to Non-PEA.

Predictors of early response to balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background:

To achieve favorable hemodynamics, the number of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) sessions varied significantly among patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Increased BPA sessions burdened patients financially and psychologically. We aim to identify baseline characteristics that could predict early BPA response.

Methods:

Consecutive patients who were diagnosed with inoperable CTEPH and received BPA between May 2018 and October 2021 at Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized into ‘Early BPA responders’ or ‘Non-early BPA responders’ according to the hemodynamic outcome within the first three BPA sessions.

Results:

In total, 101 patients were included into analysis. At baseline, non-early BPA responders had lower female proportion, longer disease duration, and poorer laboratory test results compared with early responders, whereas hemodynamics were comparable. After the first three BPA sessions, hemodynamic improvement was more significant in early responders. Incidence of complication was comparable between the two groups. Multivariable logistic analysis identified that female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 7.155, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.323-38.692, p = 0.022), disease duration (OR: 0.851, 95% CI: 0.727-0.995, p = 0.043), baseline total bilirubin (OR: 0.934, 95% CI: 0.875-0.996, p = 0.038), and baseline NT-proBNP (OR: 0.473, 95% CI: 0.255-0.879, p = 0.018) were independently associated with early BPA response. Combination of these four parameters could predict 90% early BPA response.

Conclusions:

Patients with shorter disease duration, female sex, lower baseline NT-proBNP, and lower baseline total bilirubin are more likely to achieve early hemodynamic response to BPA. Moreover, early hemodynamic response was not accompanied with increased incidence of procedure-related complications.