Pediatric heart transplantation following donation after circulatory death, distant procurement, and ex-situ perfusion

Improvement in patient selection, management and outcomes in infant heart transplant from 2000 to 2020

OBJECTIVES

The study's primary outcome was to evaluate if post-transplant survival has improved over the last 2 decades. Secondary outcomes were the infant's waitlist mortality, waitlist time and identifying factors that affected the infant's survival.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for infants (age ≤ 1) who were listed for heart transplantation between 2000 and 2020. The years were divided into 3 eras (Era 1 2000-2006, Era 2 2007-2013 and Era 3 2014-2020). Non-parametric tests, Chi-Squared, Log-Rank test and Cox-Proportional hazard ratio were used for analysis (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

4234 infants were listed for heart transplants between 2000 and 2020. At the time of listing, Infants in era 3 were more likely to be heavier [in kg (P < 0.001)] and had better renal function (P < 0.001). Additionally, they were less likely to be on dialysis (P < 0.001), on a ventilator (P < 0.001) and on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P < 0.001). There has been a significant increase in left ventricular assist device use (P < 0.001), though there was no difference in waitlist (0.154) or post-transplant survival (0.51). In all 3 eras, waitlist survival (P < 0.001) and post-transplant survival (P < 0.001) have improved significantly. Congenital heart disease and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with worse waitlist survival in all 3 eras (P < 0.05). Infants are now waiting longer on the waitlist (in days) (33 Era 1 vs 46 Era 2 vs 67 Era 3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infant heart transplant outcomes have improved, but they are now waiting longer on the waitlist. Further improvement in increasing the donor pool, expert consensus on listing strategies and donor utilization is needed to improve outcomes.

Impact of Hemoglobin Level in Ex Vivo Heart Perfusion on Donation After Circulatory Death Hearts: A Juvenile Porcine Experimental Model

BACKGROUND

Ex vivo heart perfusion (EVHP) of donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts has become an effective strategy in adults; however, the small circulating volume in pediatrics poses the challenge of a low-hemoglobin (Hb) perfusate. We aimed to determine the impact of perfusate Hb levels during EVHP on DCD hearts using a juvenile porcine model.

METHODS

Sixteen DCD piglet hearts (11-14 kg) were reperfused for 4 h in unloaded mode followed by working mode. Metabolism, cardiac function, and cell damage were compared between the low-Hb (Hb, 5.0-5.9 g/dL; n = 8) and control (Hb, 7.5-8.4 g/dL; n = 8) groups. Between-group differences were evaluated using 2-sample t -tests or Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

During unloaded mode, the low-Hb group showed lower myocardial oxygen consumption ( P  < 0.001), a higher arterial lactate level ( P  = 0.001), and worse systolic ventricular function ( P  < 0.001). During working mode, the low-Hb group had a lower cardiac output (mean, 71% versus 106% of normal cardiac output, P  = 0.010) and a higher arterial lactate level ( P  = 0.031). Adjusted cardiac troponin-I ( P  = 0.112) did not differ between the groups. Morphological myocyte injury in the left ventricle was more severe in the low-Hb group ( P  = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-Hb perfusate with inadequate oxygen delivery induced anaerobic metabolism, resulting in suboptimal DCD heart recovery and declined cardiac function. Arranging an optimal perfusate is crucial to organ protection, and further endeavors to refine the priming volume of EVHP or the transfusion strategy are required.

Ex vivo heart perfusion: an updated systematic review

Due to the discrepancy between patients awaiting a heart transplant and the availability of donor hearts, strategies to expand the donor pool and improve the transplant's success are crucial. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the ex vivo heart preservation (EVHP) experience as an alternative to standard cold static storage (CSS). EVHP techniques can improve the preservation of the donor's heart before transplantation and allow for pre-transplant organ evaluation.

Neonatal heart transplantation in the United States: Trends and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation in the neonatal period is associated with excellent survival. However, outcomes data are scant and have been obtained primarily from two single-center reports within the United States. We sought to analyze the outcomes of all neonatal heart transplants performed in the United States using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) dataset.

METHODS

The UNOS dataset was queried for patients who underwent infant heart transplantation from 1987 to 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on age - neonates (<=31 days), and older infants (32 days-365 days). Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared, along with follow up survival data.

RESULTS

Overall, 474 newborns have undergone heart transplantation in the United States since 1987. Freedom from death or re-transplantation for neonates was 63.5%, 58.8% and 51.6% at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Patients in the newborn group had lower unadjusted survival compared to older infants (p < .001), but conditional 1-year survival was higher in neonates (p = .03). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in survival between the two age groups (p = .43). Black race, congenital heart disease diagnosis, earlier surgical era, and preoperative mechanical circulatory support use were associated with lower survival among infant transplants (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal heart transplantation is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Neonates do not have a significant survival advantage over older infants. Widespread applicability is limited by the small number of available donors. Efforts to expand the donor pool to include non-standard donor populations ought to be considered.

Knowledge gaps in heart and lung donation after the circulatory determination of death: Report of a workshop of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

In a workshop sponsored by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, experts identified current knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the scientific, conceptual, and ethical understanding of organ donation after the circulatory determination of death and its technologies. To minimize organ injury from warm ischemia and produce better recipient outcomes, innovative techniques to perfuse and oxygenate organs postmortem in situ, such as thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, are being implemented in several medical centers in the US and elsewhere. These technologies have improved organ outcomes but have raised ethical and legal questions. Re-establishing donor circulation postmortem can be viewed as invalidating the condition of permanent cessation of circulation on which the earlier death determination was made and clamping arch vessels to exclude brain circulation can be viewed as inducing brain death. Alternatively, TA-NRP can be viewed as localized in-situ organ perfusion, not whole-body resuscitation, that does not invalidate death determination. Further scientific, conceptual, and ethical studies, such as those identified in this workshop, can inform and help resolve controversies raised by this practice.

Considerations for the use of porcine organ donation models in preclinical organ donor intervention research

Use of animal models in preclinical transplant research is essential to the optimization of human allografts for clinical transplantation. Animal models of organ donation and preservation help to advance and improve technical elements of solid organ recovery and facilitate research of ischemia-reperfusion injury, organ preservation strategies, and future donor-based interventions. Important considerations include cost, public opinion regarding the conduct of animal research, translational value, and relevance of the animal model for clinical practice. We present an overview of two porcine models of organ donation: donation following brain death (DBD) and donation following circulatory death (DCD). The cardiovascular anatomy and physiology of pigs closely resembles those of humans, making this species the most appropriate for pre-clinical research. Pigs are also considered a potential source of organs for human heart and kidney xenotransplantation. It is imperative to minimize animal loss during procedures that are surgically complex. We present our experience with these models and describe in detail the use cases, procedural approach, challenges, alternatives, and limitations of each model.

Financial impact of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: A single-center analysis

INTRODUCTION

Clinical success of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation is leading to growing adoption of this technique. In comparison to procurement from a brain-dead donor, DCD requires additional resources. The economic impact of DCD heart transplantation from the hospital perspective is not well known.

METHODS

We compared the financial data of patients who received DCD allografts to those who received a DBD organ at our institution from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. We also compared the cost of ex-situ machine perfusion to in-situ organ perfusion employed during DCD recovery.

RESULTS

We performed 58 DBD and 22 DCD heart-alone transplantations during the study period. Out of 22 DCD grafts, 16 were recovered with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) and six with direct procurement followed by normothermic machine perfusion (DP-NMP). The contribution margin per case for DBD versus DCD was $234,362 and $235,440 (P = .72). The direct costs did not significantly differ between the two groups ($171,949 and 186,250; P = .49). In comparing the two methods of procuring hearts from DCD donors, the direct cost of TA-NRP was $155,955 in comparison to $223,399 for DP-NMP (P = .21). This difference translated into a clinically meaningful but not statistically significant greater contribution margin for TA-NRP ($242, 657 vs. $175,768; P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that the adoption of DCD procurement did not have a negative financial impact on the contribution margin in our institution. Programs considering starting DCD heart transplantation, and those who are currently performing DCD procurement should evaluate their own financial situation.

Mitochondrial transplantation preserves myocardial function and viability in pediatric and neonatal pig hearts donated after circulatory death

OBJECTIVE

Mitochondrial transplantation has been shown to preserve myocardial function and viability in adult porcine hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) . Herein, we investigate the efficacy of mitochondrial transplantation for the preservation of myocardial function and viability in neonatal and pediatric porcine DCD heart donation.

METHODS

Circulatory death was induced in neonatal and pediatric Yorkshire pigs by cessation of mechanical ventilation. Hearts underwent 20 or 36 minutes of warm ischemia time (WIT), 10 minutes of cold cardioplegic arrest, and then were harvested for ex situ heart perfusion (ESHP). Following 15 minutes of ESHP, hearts received either vehicle (VEH) or vehicle containing isolated autologous mitochondria (MITO). A sham nonischemic group (SHAM) did not undergo WIT, mimicking donation after brain death heart procurement. Hearts underwent 2 hours each of unloaded and loaded ESHP perfusion.

RESULTS

Following 4 hours of ESHP perfusion, left ventricle developed pressure, dP/dt max, and fractional shortening were significantly decreased (P < .001) in DCD hearts receiving VEH compared with SHAM hearts. In contrast, DCD hearts receiving MITO exhibited significantly preserved left ventricle developed pressure, dP/dt max, and fractional shortening (P < .001 each vs VEH, not significant vs SHAM). Infarct size was significantly decreased in DCD hearts receiving MITO as compared with VEH (P < .001). Pediatric DCD hearts subjected to extended WIT demonstrated significantly preserved fractional shortening and significantly decreased infarct size with MITO (P < .01 each vs VEH).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitochondrial transplantation in neonatal and pediatric pig DCD heart donation significantly enhances the preservation of myocardial function and viability and mitigates against damage secondary to extended WIT.

Reality of DCD donor use in pediatric thoracic transplantation in the United States

In the US, the first pediatric donation after circulatory death (DCD) thoracic transplant was done in 2004; however, ethical controversy led to minimal utilization of these donors. The present study was performed to characterize the current state of pediatric DCD heart and lung transplantation (HTx, LTx). Children (<18 year old) who underwent HTx or LTx using DCD donors from June 2004 to June 2022 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. A total of 14 DCD recipients were identified: 7 (50%) HTx and 7 (50%) LTx. Donor and recipient demographics are described in Table 1. One and 5-year post-transplant survival were as follows: HTx recipients (64% for each) and LTx recipients (86%, 55%). Although often discussed, the national experience with DCD donors for pediatric HTx and LTx remains limited and not being practiced consistently by any pediatric program. Given the critical organ shortage, DCD use in the field of pediatric thoracic transplantation should be strongly considered.

The British Transplantation Society guidelines on cardiothoracic organ transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death

Maximising organ utilisation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors could help meet some of the shortfall in organ supply, but it represents a major challenge, particularly as organ donors and transplant recipients become older and more medically complex over time. Success is dependent upon establishing common practices and accepted protocols that allow the safe sharing of DCD organs and maximise the use of the DCD donor pool. The British Transplantation Society 'Guideline on transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death' has recently been updated. This manuscript summarises the relevant recommendations from chapters specifically related to transplantation of cardiothoracic organs.

A national pilot of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation within the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

The United Kingdom (UK) was one of the first countries to pioneer heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. To facilitate equity of access to DCD hearts by all UK heart transplant centers and expand the retrieval zone nationwide, a Joint Innovation Fund (JIF) pilot was provided by NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) and NHS England (NHSE). The activity and outcomes of this national DCD heart pilot program are reported.

METHODS

This is a national multi-center, retrospective cohort study examining early outcomes of DCD heart transplants performed across 7 heart transplant centers, adult and pediatric, throughout the UK. Hearts were retrieved using the direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) technique by 3 specialist retrieval teams trained in ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion. Outcomes were compared against DCD heart transplants before the national pilot era and against contemporaneous donation after brain death (DBD) heart transplants, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, chi-square test, and Wilcoxon's rank-sum.

RESULTS

From September 7, 2020 to February 28, 2022, 215 potential DCD hearts were offered of which 98 (46%) were accepted and attended. There were 77 potential donors (36%) which proceeded to death within 2 hours, with 57 (27%) donor hearts successfully retrieved and perfused ex situ and 50 (23%) DCD hearts going on to be transplanted. During this same period, 179 DBD hearts were transplanted. Overall, there was no difference in the 30-day survival rate between DCD and DBD (94% vs 93%) or 90 day survival (90% vs 90%) respectively. There was a higher rate of ECMO use post-DCD heart transplants compared to DBD (40% vs 16%, p = 0.0006), and DCD hearts in the pre pilot era, (17%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in length of ICU stay (9 DCD vs 8 days DBD, p = 0.13) nor hospital stay (28 DCD vs 27 DBD days, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

During this pilot study, 3 specialist retrieval teams were able to retrieve DCD hearts nationally for all 7 UK heart transplant centers. DCD donors increased overall heart transplantation in the UK by 28% with equivalent early posttransplant survival compared with DBD donors.

Cardioprotective Actions of a Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist on Hearts Donated After Circulatory Death

Background Heart transplantation with a donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart is complicated by substantial organ ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, manifests protection against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in other settings. Here we evaluate the effects of exenatide on DCD hearts in juvenile pigs. Methods and Results DCD hearts with 15-minutes of global warm ischemia after circulatory arrest were reperfused ex vivo and switched to working mode. Treatment with concentration 5-nmol exenatide was given during reperfusion. DCD hearts treated with exenatide showed higher myocardial oxygen consumption (exenatide [n=7] versus controls [n=7], over 60-120 minutes of reperfusion, P<0.001) and lower cardiac troponin-I release (27.94±11.17 versus 42.25±11.80 mmol/L, P=0.04) during reperfusion compared with controls. In working mode, exenatide-treated hearts showed better diastolic function (dp/dt min: -3644±620 versus -2193±610 mm Hg/s, P<0.001; Tau: 15.62±1.78 versus 24.59±7.35 milliseconds, P=0.02; lateral e' velocity: 11.27 ± 1.46 versus 7.19±2.96, P=0.01), as well as lower venous lactate levels (3.17±0.75 versus 5.17±1.44 mmol/L, P=0.01) compared with controls. Higher levels of activated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (phosphorylated to total endothelial nitric oxide synthase levels: 2.71±1.16 versus 1.37±0.35, P=0.02) with less histological evidence of endothelial damage (von Willebrand factor expression: 0.024±0.007 versus 0.331±0.302, pixel/μm, P=0.04) was also observed with exenatide treatment versus controls. Conclusions Acute treatment of DCD hearts with exenatide limits myocardial and endothelial injury and improves donor cardiac function.