Airway oscillometry parameters in baseline lung allograft dysfunction: Associations from a multicenter study

Characterization of Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Single Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) is characterized by the failure to achieve normal baseline lung function after double lung transplantation (DLTX) and is associated with a high risk of mortality. In single lung transplant (SLTX) recipients, however, cutoff values and associated factors have not been explored. Here, we aimed to define BLAD in SLTX recipients, investigate its impact on allograft survival, and identify potential risk factors for BLAD in SLTX recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of the LTX cohort of LMU Munich between 2010 and 2018. In accordance with DLTX cutoffs, BLAD in SLTX recipients was defined as failure to achieve percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s and percentage of forced vital capacity of >60% on 2 consecutive tests >3 wk apart. Survival analysis and regression analysis for potential predictors of BLAD were performed.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 141 SLTX recipients, 43% of patients met BLAD criteria. SLTX recipients with BLAD demonstrated impaired survival. Native lung hyperinflation was associated with BLAD in obstructive disease, whereas donor/recipient lung size mismatch was associated with BLAD in both obstructive and restrictive underlying diseases. Pulmonary function testing at 3 mo after lung transplantation predicted normal baseline lung function in SLTX recipients with obstructive lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

BLAD in SLTX recipients is as relevant as in DLTX recipients and should generally be considered in the follow-up of LTX recipients. Risk factors for BLAD differed between underlying obstructive and restrictive lung disease. A better understanding of associated factors may help in the development of preventive strategies.

Baseline lung allograft dysfunction after bilateral deceased-donor lung transplantation: A single-center experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

Baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) refers to a condition in which a lung transplant recipient does not achieve normal pulmonary function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity of <80% of predicted values). Although BLAD is reportedly associated with a poor prognosis, the condition has not been examined in Japanese patients.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively examined 38 Japanese adults who underwent bilateral lung transplantation from 2015 to 2022 in a single center.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (55%) patients met the criteria for BLAD. No significant differences were found in recipient or donor factors between the BLAD and non-BLAD groups, but the donor-recipient ratio of the predicted vital capacity was lower in the BLAD group (p = 0.009). The intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator duration, and blood loss during transplant surgery were significantly higher in the BLAD group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in survival. The median observation period was significantly shorter in the BLAD than non-BLAD group (744 vs.1192 days, respectively; p = 0.031). The time to reach the normal threshold of pulmonary function after lung transplantation varied among the patients, ranging from 6 months to 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of these Japanese patients with BLAD were similar to those of other patients in previous reports. The effects of the observation period and donor-recipient age discrepancy on BLAD require further exploration.

Shah P, Mathew J, Kong H, Charya A, Luikart H, Aryal S, Nathan SD, Orens JB, Khush KK, Kyoo Jang M, Agbor-Enoh S. Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Bilateral Lung Transplantation Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Death: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

A prior single-center, retrospective cohort study identified baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) as a risk factor for death in bilateral lung transplant recipients. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we test the association of BLAD with death in bilateral lung transplant recipients, identify clinical risk factors for BLAD, and assess its association with allograft injury on the molecular level.

Methods

This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 173 bilateral lung transplant recipients that underwent serial pulmonary function testing and plasma collection for donor-derived cell-free DNA at prespecified time points. BLAD was defined as failure to achieve ≥80% predicted for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity after lung transplant, on 2 consecutive measurements at least 3 mo apart.

Results

BLAD was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.69; P = 0.03) but not chronic lung allograft dysfunction alone (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.87-2.95; P = 0.13). Recipient obesity (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.15-2.80; P = 0.04) and donor age (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P = 0.004) increased the risk of developing BLAD. Patients with BLAD did not demonstrate higher log10(donor-derived cell-free DNA) levels compared with no BLAD (slope [SE]: -0.0095 [0.0007] versus -0.0109 [0.0007]; P = 0.15).

Conclusions

BLAD is associated with an increased risk of death following lung transplantation, representing an important posttransplant outcome with valuable prognostic significance; however, early allograft specific injury on the molecular level does not increase the risk of BLAD, supporting further mechanistic insight into disease pathophysiology.

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Effects of donor smoking history on early post-transplant lung function measured by oscillometry

Introduction

Prior studies assessing outcomes of lung transplants from cigarette-smoking donors found mixed results. Oscillometry, a non-invasive test of respiratory impedance, detects changes in lung function of smokers prior to diagnosis of COPD, and identifies spirometrically silent episodes of rejection post-transplant. We hypothesise that oscillometry could identify abnormalities in recipients of smoking donor lungs and discriminate from non-smoking donors.

Methods

This prospective single-center cohort study analysed 233 double-lung recipients. Oscillometry was performed alongside routine conventional pulmonary function tests (PFT) post-transplant. Multivariable regression models were constructed to compare oscillometry and conventional PFT parameters between recipients of lungs from smoking vs non-smoking donors.

Results

The analysis included 109 patients who received lungs from non-smokers and 124 from smokers. Multivariable analysis identified significant differences between recipients of smoking and non-smoking lungs in the oscillometric measurements R5-19, X5, AX, R5z and X5z, but no differences in %predicted FEV1, FEV1/FVC, %predicted TLC or %predicted DLCO. An analysis of the smoking group also demonstrated associations between increasing smoke exposure, quantified in pack years, and all the oscillometry parameters, but not the conventional PFT parameters.

Conclusion

An interaction was identified between donor-recipient sex match and the effect of smoking. The association between donor smoking and oscillometry outcomes was significant predominantly in the female donor/female recipient group.

Impulse Oscillometry Versus Spirometry to Detect Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Bilateral Lung Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Diagnostic Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and especially bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), remain dominant causes of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Interest is growing in the forced oscillation technique, of which impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a form, as a tool to improve our understanding of these disorders. However, data remain limited and no longitudinal studies have been published, meaning there is no information regarding any capacity IOS may have for the early detection of CLAD.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective longitudinal study enrolling a consecutive sample of adult bilateral lung transplant recipients with healthy lung allografts or CLAD and performed ongoing paired IOS and spirometry tests on a clinically determined basis. We assessed for correlations between IOS and spirometry and examined any predictive value either modality may hold for the early detection of BOS.

RESULTS

We enrolled 91 patients and conducted testing for 43 mo, collecting 558 analyzable paired IOS and spirometry tests, with a median of 9 tests per subject (interquartile range, 5-12) and a median testing interval of 92 d (interquartile range, 62-161). Statistically significant moderate-to-strong correlations were demonstrated between all IOS parameters and spirometry, except resistance at 20 Hz, which is a proximal airway measure. No predictive value for the early detection of BOS was found for IOS or spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the first longitudinal data from IOS after lung transplantation and adds considerably to the growing literature, showing unequivocal correlations with spirometry but failing to demonstrate a predictive value for BOS.

Oscillometry in Stable Single and Double Lung Allograft Recipients Transplanted for Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of a Multi-Center Australian Study

Peak spirometry after single lung transplantation (SLTx) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is lower than after double lung transplantation (DLTx), however the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear. We aim to assess respiratory mechanics in SLTx and DLTx for ILD using oscillometry. Spirometry and oscillometry (tremoflo® C-100) were performed in stable SLTx and DLTx recipients in a multi-center study. Resistance (R5, R5-19) and reactance (X5) were compared between LTx recipient groups, matched by age and gender. A model of respiratory impedance using ILD and DLTx data was performed. In total, 45 stable LTx recipients were recruited (SLTx n = 23, DLTx n = 22; males: 87.0% vs. 77.3%; median age 63.0 vs. 63.0 years). Spirometry was significantly lower after SLTx compared with DLTx: %-predicted mean (SD) FEV1 [70.0 (14.5) vs. 93.5 (26.0)%]; FVC [70.5 (16.8) vs. 90.7 (12.8)%], p < 0.01. R5 and R5-19 were similar between groups (p = 0.94 and p = 0.11, respectively) yet X5 was significantly worse after SLTx: median (IQR) X5 [-1.88 (-2.89 to -1.39) vs. -1.22 (-1.87 to -0.86)] cmH2O.s/L], p < 0.01. R5 and X5 measurements from the model were congruent with measurements in SLTx recipients. The similarities in resistance, yet differences in spirometry and reactance between both transplant groups suggest the important contribution of elastic properties to the pathophysiology. Oscillometry may provide further insight into the physiological changes occurring post-LTx.

Window of opportunity for respiratory oscillometry: A review of recent research

Oscillometry has been around for almost 70 years, but there are still many unknowns. The test is performed during tidal breathing and is therefore free from patient-dependent factors that could influence the results. The Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT), which requires minimal patient cooperation, is gaining ground, particularly with elderly patients and children. In pulmonology, it is a valuable tool for assessing obstructive conditions (with a distinction between central and peripheral obstruction) and restrictive disorders (intrapulmonary and extrapulmonary). Its sensitivity allows the assessment of bronchodilator and bronchoconstrictor responses. Different lung diseases show different patterns of changes in FOT, especially studied in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because of these differences, many studies have analysed the usefulness of this technique in different areas of medicine. In this paper, the authors would like to present the basics of oscillometry with the areas of its most recent clinical applications.