• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4632662)   Today's Articles (2443)   Subscriber (49920)
For: Baumann U, Nobbe A. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hear Res 2006;213:34-42. [PMID: 16442249 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2005] [Revised: 12/12/2005] [Accepted: 12/12/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
De Groote E, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Macherey O. Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2024;156:2060-2076. [PMID: 39345135 PMCID: PMC11444735 DOI: 10.1121/10.0029023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
2
Breitsprecher TM, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Dazert S, Doyle U, Dhanasingh A, Großmann W, Hagen R, Van de Heyning P, Mlynski R, Neudert M, Rajan G, Rak K, Van Rompaey V, Schmutzhard J, Volkenstein S, Völter C, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Weiss NM. Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY OPEN 2023;3:e045. [PMID: 38516541 PMCID: PMC10950166 DOI: 10.1097/ono.0000000000000045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
3
Arias-Vergara T, Batliner A, Rader T, Polterauer D, Högerle C, Müller J, Orozco-Arroyave JR, Nöth E, Schuster M. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Versus Typical Hearing Persons: An Automatic Analysis of Acoustic-Prosodic Parameters. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2022;65:4623-4636. [PMID: 36417788 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
4
Griessner A, Schatzer R, Steixner V, Rajan GP, Zierhofer C, Távora-Vieira D. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions. Trends Hear 2021;25:23312165211020645. [PMID: 34041983 PMCID: PMC8165527 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211020645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]  Open
5
Rak K, Ilgen L, Taeger J, Schendzielorz P, Voelker J, Kaulitz S, Müller-Graff FT, Kurz A, Neun T, Hagen R. Influence of cochlear parameters on the current practice in cochlear implantation : Development of a concept for personalized medicine. HNO 2021;69:24-30. [PMID: 33459799 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00969-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
6
[Influence of cochlear parameters on the current practice in cochlear implantation : Development of a concept for personalized medicine. German version]. HNO 2020;69:943-951. [PMID: 33315129 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00968-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
7
The sound sensation of a pure tone in cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235504. [PMID: 32658911 PMCID: PMC7357770 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
8
Sorrentino F, Gheller F, Favaretto N, Franz L, Stocco E, Brotto D, Bovo R. Music perception in adult patients with cochlear implant. HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/21695717.2020.1719787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
9
Peters JPM, Bennink E, van Zanten GA. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant. Audiol Neurootol 2019;24:38-48. [PMID: 30995658 DOI: 10.1159/000499154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]  Open
10
Downing M. Electrode Designs for Protection of the Delicate Cochlear Structures. J Int Adv Otol 2019;14:401-403. [PMID: 30644381 DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.6461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
11
Landsberger DM, Vermeire K, Claes A, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant. Ear Hear 2018;37:e149-59. [PMID: 26583480 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
12
Peters JP, Bennink E, Grolman W, van Zanten GA. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant. Hear Res 2016;342:124-133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
13
Rader T, Döge J, Adel Y, Weissgerber T, Baumann U. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness. Hear Res 2016;339:94-103. [PMID: 27374479 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
14
Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2016;36:e207-13. [PMID: 25860624 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
15
Hoth S, Rösli-Khabas M, Herisanu I, Plinkert PK, Praetorius M. Cochlear implantation in recipients with single-sided deafness: Audiological performance. Cochlear Implants Int 2016;17:190-199. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1176778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
16
Devocht EM, Dees G, Arts RA, Smits JJ, George EL, van Hoof M, Stokroos RJ. Revisiting Place-Pitch Match in CI Recipients Using 3D Imaging Analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015;125:378-84. [DOI: 10.1177/0003489415616130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
17
Grasmeder ML, Verschuur CA. Perception of the pitch and naturalness of popular music by cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2015;16 Suppl 3:S79-90. [DOI: 10.1179/1467010015z.000000000266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
18
Dorman MF, Parkin JL. The role of the Utah Artificial Ear project in the development of the modern cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants Int 2015;16 Suppl 2:S1-S11. [DOI: 10.1179/1467010015z.000000000246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
19
van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Verbist BM, Muurling TJ, Frijns JH. The Influence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position on Performance. Audiol Neurootol 2015;20:202-11. [DOI: 10.1159/000377616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
20
Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time. Hear Res 2015;326:8-14. [PMID: 25840373 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
21
Nogueira W, Litvak LM, Saoji AA, Büchner A. Design and evaluation of a cochlear implant strategy based on a "Phantom" channel. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120148. [PMID: 25806818 PMCID: PMC4373925 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
22
Grasmeder ML, Verschuur CA, Batty VB. Optimizing frequency-to-electrode allocation for individual cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2014;136:3313. [PMID: 25480076 DOI: 10.1121/1.4900831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
23
Plant KL, McDermott HJ, van Hoesel RJM, Dawson PW, Cowan RS. Factors influencing electrical place pitch perception in bimodal listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2014;136:1199. [PMID: 25190394 DOI: 10.1121/1.4892790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
24
Nguyen TAK, Ranieri M, DiGiovanna J, Peter O, Genovese V, Perez Fornos A, Micera S. A real-time research platform to study vestibular implants with gyroscopic inputs in vestibular deficient subjects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2014;8:474-484. [PMID: 25073124 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2013.2290089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
25
Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res 2014;315:10-24. [PMID: 24975087 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 06/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
26
Nishimura M, Song WJ. Greenwood frequency–position relationship in the primary auditory cortex in guinea pigs. Neuroimage 2014;89:181-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Revised: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 12/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]  Open
27
Prentiss S, Staecker H, Wolford B. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: A case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies. Cochlear Implants Int 2014;15:161-5. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
28
Zeng FG, Tang Q, Lu T. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation. PLoS One 2014;9:e88662. [PMID: 24551131 PMCID: PMC3923805 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
29
Landsberger DM, Mertens G, Punte AK, Van De Heyning P. Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2014;135:EL75-EL81. [PMID: 25234918 PMCID: PMC3985910 DOI: 10.1121/1.4862875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 12/17/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
30
Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Hear Res 2013;309:26-35. [PMID: 24252455 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 10/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
31
Bahmer A, Baumann U. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: Effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14:142-9. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762812y.0000000011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
32
Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Schleich P, Van de Heyning PH. Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing. Hear Res 2013;306:29-36. [PMID: 24055624 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 08/31/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
33
Lonka E, Relander-Syrjänen K, Johansson R, Näätänen R, Alho K, Kujala T. The mismatch negativity (MMN) brain response to sound frequency changes in adult cochlear implant recipients: a follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:853-7. [PMID: 23768012 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2013.780293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
34
Macherey O, Carlyon RP. Place-pitch manipulations with cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2012;131:2225-36. [PMID: 22423718 PMCID: PMC3383798 DOI: 10.1121/1.3677260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
35
Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli. Int J Audiol 2011;51:389-98. [PMID: 22201528 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.642010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
36
Digeser FM, Hast A, Wesarg T, Hessel H, Hoppe U. Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;269:2317-26. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1885-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2011] [Accepted: 12/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
37
Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes. Ear Hear 2011;32:411-27. [PMID: 21248642 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182064bda] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
38
Pitch Matching Psychometrics in Electric Acoustic Stimulation. Ear Hear 2011;32:656-62. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31821a4800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
39
Strydom T, Hanekom JJ. The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011;129:920-933. [PMID: 21361449 DOI: 10.1121/1.3518760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
40
von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Adunka OF. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: A Review of the First Decade. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011;16 Suppl 2:1-30. [DOI: 10.1159/000327765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2010] [Accepted: 02/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
41
Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;268:27-39. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1335-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
42
Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity. J Neurosci 2010;30:1937-46. [PMID: 20130202 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4949-09.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]  Open
43
Cochlear implant patients' speech understanding in background noise: effect of mismatch between electrode assigned frequencies and perceived pitch. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2010;124:828-34. [PMID: 20202276 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215110000320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
44
Spahr AJ, Litvak LM, Dorman MF, Bohanan AR, Mishra LN. Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2008;51:1599-606. [PMID: 18664681 PMCID: PMC3683310 DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0254)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
45
Vermeire K, Nobbe A, Schleich P, Nopp P, Voormolen MH, Van de Heyning PH. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Hear Res 2008;245:98-106. [PMID: 18817861 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2008] [Revised: 08/25/2008] [Accepted: 09/06/2008] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
46
Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL. Intraneural stimulation for auditory prosthesis: Modiolar trunk and intracranial stimulation sites. Hear Res 2008;242:52-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2008] [Revised: 03/11/2008] [Accepted: 04/02/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
47
Nardo WD, Cantore I, Marchese MR, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Paludetti G. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1321-8. [PMID: 18379812 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0655-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2007] [Accepted: 03/18/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
48
Stasiunas A, Verikas A, Miliauskas R, Stasiuniene N, Bacauskiene M. Physiologically inspired signal preprocessing for auditory prostheses: Insights from the electro-motility of the OHC. Med Eng Phys 2008;30:171-81. [PMID: 17448719 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2006] [Revised: 11/30/2006] [Accepted: 03/02/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
49
Variance of Angular Insertion Depths in Free-Fitting and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:131-6. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318157f0ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
50
Başkent D, Shannon RV. Combined Effects of Frequency Compression-Expansion and Shift on Speech Recognition. Ear Hear 2007;28:277-89. [PMID: 17485977 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e318050d398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA