1
|
Aldag N, Nogueira W. Psychoacoustic and electroencephalographic responses to changes in amplitude modulation depth and frequency in relation to speech recognition in cochlear implantees. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8181. [PMID: 38589483 PMCID: PMC11002021 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) are one of the most important features that cochlear implant (CI) users rely on to understand speech. Electroencephalographic assessment of TEM encoding could help clinicians to predict speech recognition more objectively, even in patients unable to provide active feedback. The acoustic change complex (ACC) and the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) evoked by low-frequency amplitude-modulated pulse trains can be used to assess TEM encoding with electrical stimulation of individual CI electrodes. In this study, we focused on amplitude modulation detection (AMD) and amplitude modulation frequency discrimination (AMFD) with stimulation of a basal versus an apical electrode. In twelve adult CI users, we (a) assessed behavioral AMFD thresholds and (b) recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs), AMD-ACC, AMFD-ACC, and ASSR in a combined 3-stimulus paradigm. We found that the electrophysiological responses were significantly higher for apical than for basal stimulation. Peak amplitudes of AMFD-ACC were small and (therefore) did not correlate with speech-in-noise recognition. We found significant correlations between speech-in-noise recognition and (a) behavioral AMFD thresholds and (b) AMD-ACC peak amplitudes. AMD and AMFD hold potential to develop a clinically applicable tool for assessing TEM encoding to predict speech recognition in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Aldag
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', Hanover, Germany
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', Hanover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
David W, Verwaerde E, Gransier R, Wouters J. Effects of analysis window on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2023; 438:108882. [PMID: 37688847 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are phase-locked responses of the auditory system to the envelope of a stimulus. These responses can be used as an objective proxy to assess temporal envelope processing and its related functional outcomes such as hearing thresholds and speech perception, in normal-hearing listeners, in persons with hearing impairment, as well as in cochlear-implant (CI) users. While ASSRs are traditionally measured using a continuous stimulation paradigm, an alternative is the intermittent stimulation paradigm, whereby stimuli are presented with silence intervals in between. This paradigm could be more useful in a clinical setting as it allows for other neural responses to be analysed concurrently. One clinical use case of the intermittent paradigm is to objectively program CIs during an automatic fitting session whereby electrically evoked ASSRs (eASSRs) as well as other evoked potentials are used to predict behavioural thresholds. However, there is no consensus yet about the optimal analysis parameters for an intermittent paradigm in order to detect and measure eASSRs reliably. In this study, we used the intermittent paradigm to evoke eASSRs in adult CI users and investigated whether the early response buildup affects the response measurement outcomes. To this end, we varied the starting timepoint and length of the analysis window within which the responses were analysed. We used the amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), phase, and pairwise phase consistency (PPC) to characterize the responses. Moreover, we set out to find the optimal stimulus duration for efficient and reliable eASSR measurements. These analyses were performed at two stimulation levels, i.e., 100% and 50% of the dynamic range of each participant. Results revealed that inclusion of the first 300 ms in the analysis window leads to overestimation of response amplitude and underestimation of response phase. Additionally, the response SNR and PPC were not affected by the inclusion of the first 300 ms in the analysis window. However, the latter two metrics were highly dependent on the stimulus duration which complicates comparisons across studies. Finally, the optimal stimulus duration for quick and reliable characterization of eASSRs was found to be around 800 ms for the stimulation level of 100% DR. These findings suggest that inclusion of the early onset period of eASSR recordings negatively influences the response measurement outcomes and that efficient and reliable eASSR measurements are possible using stimuli of around 800 ms long. This will pave the path for the development of a clinically feasible eASSR measurement in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter David
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Elise Verwaerde
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin Gransier
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- ExpORL, Dept. of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 box 721, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holder JT, Henry MR, MacDonald AE, Gifford RH. Cochlear Implant Upper Stimulation Levels: eSRT vs. Loudness Scaling. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e667-e672. [PMID: 37621113 PMCID: PMC10637929 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the difference in speech recognition and sound quality between programming upper stimulation levels using behavioral measures (loudness scaling) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (eSRTs). STUDY DESIGN Double-blinded acute comparison study. SETTING Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Eighteen adult (mean age = 60 years) CI users and 20 ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech recognition scores and sound quality ratings. RESULTS Mean word and sentence in noise recognition scores were 8 and 9 percentage points higher, respectively, for the eSRT-based map. The sound quality rating was 1.4 points higher for the eSRT-based map. Sixteen out of 20 participants preferred the eSRT-based map. CONCLUSIONS Study results show significantly higher speech recognition and more favorable sound quality using an eSRT-based map compared with a loudness-scaling map using a double-blinded testing approach. Additionally, results may be understated as 18 of 20 ears had eSRTs measured before study enrollment. Results underscore the importance of incorporating eSRTs into standard clinical practice to promote best outcomes for CI recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jourdan T Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grani F, Soto-Sánchez C, Fimia A, Fernández E. Toward a personalized closed-loop stimulation of the visual cortex: Advances and challenges. Front Cell Neurosci 2022; 16:1034270. [PMID: 36582211 PMCID: PMC9792612 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.1034270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Current cortical visual prosthesis approaches are primarily unidirectional and do not consider the feed-back circuits that exist in just about every part of the nervous system. Herein, we provide a brief overview of some recent developments for better controlling brain stimulation and present preliminary human data indicating that closed-loop strategies could considerably enhance the effectiveness, safety, and long-term stability of visual cortex stimulation. We propose that the development of improved closed-loop strategies may help to enhance our capacity to communicate with the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Grani
- Institute of Bioengineering, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Cristina Soto-Sánchez
- Institute of Bioengineering, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain,Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Fimia
- Departamento de Ciencia de Materiales, Óptica y Tecnología Electrónica, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Eduardo Fernández
- Institute of Bioengineering, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain,Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain,*Correspondence: Eduardo Fernández,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Távora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Ffoulkes E, Voola M, Marino R. Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274643. [PMID: 36206248 PMCID: PMC9543874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) measures can be used to verify the cochlear implant (CI) map and consequently improve CI outcomes in adults with bilateral hearing loss. DESIGN CAEPs were measured in CI recipients using the speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/ and /s/. If CAEP responses were present for all speech tokens, the participant's map was considered "satisfactory". If CAEP responses were absent, the CI map was considered "unsatisfactory" and therefore adjusted and CAEP measures repeated. This was repeated until auditory potentials were seen in response to all four speech tokens. Speech testing was conducted pre-CI, as well as before and after CAEP-guided map adjustments. RESULTS 108 adult unilateral CI users participated, whose sound processors were previously programmed using subjective methods. 42 CI users elicited a CAEP response to all four speech tokens and therefore no further mapping adjustments were made. 66 subjected lacked a CAEP response to at least one speech token and had their CI map adjusted accordingly. Of those, 31 showed a CAEP response to all four speech tokens, and the average speech score significantly improved after CI map adjustments based on CAEP responses. CONCLUSION CAEP's are an objective tool that can be used to guide and verify CI mapping in adults CI users. Significant improvement in speech scores was observed in participants who had their CI map adjusted based on CAEP responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Andre Wedekind
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Ellen Ffoulkes
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marcus Voola
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Roberta Marino
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study. Ear Hear 2022; 43:1426-1436. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
Callejón-Leblic MA, Barrios-Romero MM, Kontides A, Sánchez-Gómez S, Beynon AJ. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2022:1-9. [PMID: 35477333 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2062578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate electrically evoked auditory cortical responses (eACR) elicited from the stimulation of intracochlear electrodes based on individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant (CI) users. DESIGN An eACR setup based on individual fitting parameters is proposed. A 50-ms alternating biphasic pulse train was used to stimulate apical, medial, and basal electrodes and to evoke auditory cortical potentials (N1-P2 complex). STUDY SAMPLE The eACR setup proposed was validated with 14 adult CI users. RESULTS Individual and grand-average eACR waveforms were obtained. The eACR amplitudes were lower in the basal than in the apical and medial regions. Earlier N1 latencies were found in CI users with lower maximum comfortable loudness levels and shorter phase duration in response to apical stimulation, while medial and basal stimulation resulted in earlier N1 latencies and larger N1-P2 amplitudes in users with longer CI experience. CONCLUSIONS eACR could be elicited by direct intracochlear stimulation using individual fitting parameters with a success rate of 71%. The highest cortical peak-to-peak amplitudes were obtained in response to apical stimulation. Unlike the P2, the N1 component appeared to be a consistent cortical potential to determine eACR and gain knowledge of the auditory processing beyond the cochlea in CI users. HighlightseACR can be elicited through direct stimulation of intracochlear electrodes.Stimulation of apical and medial regions yielded the highest N1-P2 amplitudes.CI users with lower maximum comfortable loudness levels had shorter N1 latencies during apical stimulation.The present dataset of mainly well-performing CI users suggests better cortical processing, that is, higher amplitudes and shorter latencies of N1.The N1 potential appears a more consistent and reliable potential than the P2 to determine eACR responses in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María A Callejón-Leblic
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.,Biomedical Engineering Group, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Alejandra Kontides
- MED-EL Headquarters, Innsbruck, Austria; dDonders Centre for Neurosciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Serafín Sánchez-Gómez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Andy J Beynon
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,ENT Department, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beynon AJ, Luijten BM, Mylanus EAM. Intracorporeal Cortical Telemetry as a Step to Automatic Closed-Loop EEG-Based CI Fitting: A Proof of Concept. Audiol Res 2021; 11:691-705. [PMID: 34940020 PMCID: PMC8698912 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11040062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrically evoked auditory potentials have been used to predict auditory thresholds in patients with a cochlear implant (CI). However, with exception of electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP), conventional extracorporeal EEG recording devices are still needed. Until now, built-in (intracorporeal) back-telemetry options are limited to eCAPs. Intracorporeal recording of auditory responses beyond the cochlea is still lacking. This study describes the feasibility of obtaining longer latency cortical responses by concatenating interleaved short recording time windows used for eCAP recordings. Extracochlear reference electrodes were dedicated to record cortical responses, while intracochlear electrodes were used for stimulation, enabling intracorporeal telemetry (i.e., without an EEG device) to assess higher cortical processing in CI recipients. Simultaneous extra- and intra-corporeal recordings showed that it is feasible to obtain intracorporeal slow vertex potentials with a CI similar to those obtained by conventional extracorporeal EEG recordings. Our data demonstrate a proof of concept of closed-loop intracorporeal auditory cortical response telemetry (ICT) with a cochlear implant device. This research breaks new ground for next generation CI devices to assess higher cortical neural processing based on acute or continuous EEG telemetry to enable individualized automatic and/or adaptive CI fitting with only a CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy J. Beynon
- Vestibular & Auditory Evoked Potential Lab, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Bart M. Luijten
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
| | - Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus
- Hearing & Implants, Department Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Donders Center Medical Neuroscience, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (B.M.L.); (E.A.M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gommeren H, Bosmans J, Cardon E, Mertens G, Cras P, Engelborghs S, Van Ombergen A, Gilles A, Lammers M, Van Rompaey V. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Cognitive Impairment and Their Relevance to Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Highlighting the Evidence Gap. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:781322. [PMID: 34867176 PMCID: PMC8637533 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.781322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent cause of dementia which affects a growing number of people worldwide. Early identification of people at risk to develop AD should be prioritized. Hearing loss is considered an independent potentially modifiable risk factor for accelerated cognitive decline and dementia in older adults. The main outcome of interest of this review is the alteration of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) morphology in an AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) population with and without hearing loss. Methods: Two investigators independently and systematically searched publications regarding auditory processing on a cortical level in people with cognitive impairment (MCI or AD) with and without hearing loss. Only articles which mentioned at least one auditory elicited event-related potential (ERP) component and that were written in English or Dutch were included. Animal studies were excluded. No restrictions were imposed regarding publication date. The reference list of potential sources were screened for additional articles. Results: This systematic review found no eligible articles that met all inclusion criteria. Therefore, no results were included, resulting in an empty systematic review. Conclusion: In general, dysfunction – being either from cognitive or auditory origin – reduces CAEP amplitudes and prolongs latencies. Therefore, CAEPs may be a prognostic indicator in the early stages of cognitive decline. However, it remains unclear which CAEP component alteration is due to cognitive impairment, and which is due to hearing loss (or even both). In addition, vestibular dysfunction – associated with hearing loss, cognitive impairment and AD – may also alter CAEP responses. Further CAEP studies are warranted, integrating cognitive, hearing, and vestibular evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Gommeren
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Joyce Bosmans
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Emilie Cardon
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Patrick Cras
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital and Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brussel and Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Angelique Van Ombergen
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Annick Gilles
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.,Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc Lammers
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary goal of the study was to investigate electrical cortical auditory evoked potentials (eCAEPs) at maximum comfortable level (MCL) and 50% MCL on three cochlear implant (CI) electrodes and compare them with the acoustic CAEP (aCAEPs), in terms of the amplitude and latency of the P1-N1-P2 complex. This was achieved by comparing the eCAEP obtained with the method described and stimulating single electrodes, via the fitting software spanning the cochlear array and the aCAEP obtained using the HEARLab system at four speech tokens. DESIGN Twenty MED-EL (MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria) CI adult users were tested. CAEP recording with HEARLab System was performed with speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ in free field, presented at 55 dB SPL. eCAEPs were recorded with an Evoked Potential device triggered from the MAX Programming Interface (MED-EL Medical Devices) with 70 msec electrical burst at 0.9 Hz at the apical (1), middle (6), and basal (10 or 11) CI electrode at their MCL and 50% MCL. RESULTS CAEP responses were recorded in 100% of the test subjects for the speech token /t/, 95% for the speech tokens /g/ and /s/, and 90% for the speech token /m/. For eCAEP recordings, in all subjects, it was possible to identify N1 and P2 peaks when stimulating the apical and middle electrodes. This incidence of detection decreased to an 85% chance of stimulation at 50% MCL on the same electrodes. A P1 peak was less evident for all electrodes. There was an overall increase in latency for stimulation at 50% MCL compared with MCL. There was a significant difference in the amplitude of adjacent peaks (P1-N1 and N1-P2) for 50% MCL compared with MCL. The mean of the maximum cross-correlation values were in the range of 0.63 to 0.68 for the four speech tokens. The distribution of the calculated time shift, where the maximum of the cross-correlation was found, was distributed between the speech tokens. The speech token /g/ had the highest number of valid cross-correlations, while the speech token /s/ had the lowest number. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully compared aCAEP and eCAEP in CI users. Both acoustic and electrical P1-N1-P2 recordings obtained were clear and reliable, with good correlation. Latency increased with decreasing stimulation level, while amplitude decreased. eCAEP is potentially a better option to verify speech detection at the cortical level because it (1) uses direct stimulation and therefore creates less interference and delay of the sound processor and (2) creates more flexibility with the recording setup and stimulation setting. As such, eCAEP is an alternative method for CI optimization.
Collapse
|
11
|
Saeedi A, Englert L, Hemmert W. eABR THR Estimation Using High-Rate Multi-Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:705189. [PMID: 34393715 PMCID: PMC8358126 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.705189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We estimated the electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds (eABR THRs) in response to multi-pulses with high burst rate of 10,000 pulses-per-second (pps). Growth functions of wave eV amplitudes, root mean square (RMS) values, peak of phase-locking value (PLV), and the lowest valid data point (LVDP) were calculated in 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions. The growth functions were then fitted and extrapolated with linear and exponential functions to find eABR THRs. The estimated THRs were compared to psychophysical THRs determined for multi-pulse conditions as well as to the clinical THRs measured behaviorally at the rate of 1,000 pps. The growth functions of features showed shallower growth slopes when the number of pulses increased. eABR THRs estimated in 4-, 8-, and 16-pulses conditions were closer to the clinical THRs, when compared to 1- and 2-pulses conditions. However, the smallest difference between estimated eABR THRs and clinical THRs was not always achieved from the same number of pulses. The smallest absolute difference of 30.3 μA was found for the linear fittings on growth functions of eABR RMS values in 4-pulses condition. Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCCs) between eABR THRs and psychophysical THRs were significant and relatively large in all but 16-pulses conditions. The PCCs between eABR THRs and clinical THRs, however, were smaller and in less cases significant. Results of this study showed that eABRs to multi-pulse stimulation could, to some extent, represent clinical stimulation paradigms, and thus in comparison to single pulses, could estimate clinical THRs with smaller errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Saeedi
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Ludwig Englert
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Werner Hemmert
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Munich School of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cardon G, Sharma A. Cortical Neurophysiologic Correlates of Auditory Threshold in Adults and Children With Normal Hearing and Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:28-42. [PMID: 33264574 DOI: 10.1044/2020_aja-20-00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Auditory threshold estimation using the auditory brainstem response or auditory steady state response is limited in some populations (e.g., individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder [ANSD] or those who have difficulty remaining still during testing and cannot tolerate general anesthetic). However, cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) can be recorded in many such patients and have been employed in threshold approximation. Thus, we studied CAEP estimates of auditory thresholds in participants with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, and ANSD. Method We recorded CAEPs at varying intensity levels to speech (i.e., /ba/) and tones (i.e., 1 kHz) to estimate auditory thresholds in normal-hearing adults (n = 10) and children (n = 10) and case studies of children with sensorineural hearing loss and ANSD. Results Results showed a pattern of CAEP amplitude decrease and latency increase as stimulus intensities declined until waveform components disappeared near auditory threshold levels. Overall, CAEP thresholds were within 10 dB HL of behavioral thresholds for both stimuli. Conclusions The above findings suggest that CAEPs may be clinically useful in estimating auditory threshold in populations for whom such a method does not currently exist. Physiologic threshold estimation in difficult-to-test clinical populations could lead to earlier intervention and improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett Cardon
- Department of Communication Disorders, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
| | - Anu Sharma
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5383. [PMID: 33686155 PMCID: PMC7940426 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84829-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The cochlear implant is one of the most successful medical prostheses, allowing deaf and severely hearing-impaired persons to hear again by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. A trained audiologist adjusts the stimulation settings for good speech understanding, known as "fitting" the implant. This process is based on subjective feedback from the user, making it time-consuming and challenging, especially in paediatric or communication-impaired populations. Furthermore, fittings only happen during infrequent sessions at a clinic, and therefore cannot take into account variable factors that affect the user's hearing, such as physiological changes and different listening environments. Objective audiometry, in which brain responses evoked by auditory stimulation are collected and analysed, removes the need for active patient participation. However, recording of brain responses still requires expensive equipment that is cumbersome to use. An elegant solution is to record the neural signals using the implant itself. We demonstrate for the first time the recording of continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) signals from the implanted intracochlear electrode array in human subjects, using auditory evoked potentials originating from different brain regions. This was done using a temporary recording set-up with a percutaneous connector used for research purposes. Furthermore, we show that the response morphologies and amplitudes depend crucially on the recording electrode configuration. The integration of an EEG system into cochlear implants paves the way towards chronic neuro-monitoring of hearing-impaired patients in their everyday environment, and neuro-steered hearing prostheses, which can autonomously adjust their output based on neural feedback.
Collapse
|
14
|
Martins KVC, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Tsuji RK, Bento RF. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users? Hear Res 2021; 404:108206. [PMID: 33677193 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implants (CI) programming is based on both the measurement of the minimum levels required to stimulate the auditory nerve and the maximum levels to generate loud, yet comfortable loudness. Seeking for guidance in the adequacy of this programming, the cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) have been gaining space as an important tool in the evaluation of CI users, providing information on the central auditory system. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of mishandling of electrical stimulation levels on speech processor programming on hearing thresholds, speech recognition and cortical auditory evoked potential in adult CI users. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a prospective cross-sectional study, with a sample of adult unilateral CI users of both sexes, aged at least 18 years, post-lingual deafness, with minimum experience of 12 months of device use. Selected subjects should have average free field hearing thresholds with cochlear implant equal to or better than 34 dBHL and monosyllable recognition different from 0%. Individuals who could not collaborate with the procedures or who had no CAEP recordings were excluded. Participants were routinely programmed, and the map was named MO (optimized original map). Then three experimentally wrong maps were made: optimized original map with 10 current units below the maximum comfort level (C), named MC- (map minus C); optimized original map with minus 10 current units at minimum threshold level (T), named MT- (map minus T) and optimized original map with 10 current units above minimum level (T), named MT + (map plus T). In all programs, participants underwent free-field auditory thresholds from 250Hz to 6000Hz, recorded sentences and monosyllabic recognition tests presented at 65dB SPL in quiet and in noise, and free field CAEP evaluation. All tests were performed in an acoustically treated booth, in a randomized order of map presentation. Data were compared by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS Thirty individuals were selected and signed an informed consent form. The MC- map provided worsening of all free field thresholds, quiet and noise speech recognition, and P1 wave latency delay with significant difference from the results with the MO map. The MT- map worsened the hearing thresholds and statistically significantly reduced the P2 wave latency; MT+ map improved free field thresholds except 6000Hz, worsening speech recognition, without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that maximum levels below the optimal thresholds lead to worse cochlear implant performance in both hearing thresholds and speech recognition tests in quiet and noise, increasing CAEP component P1 latency. On the other hand, the manipulation of minimum threshold levels showed alteration in audibility without significant impact on speech recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Vasconcelos Chaves Martins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil.
| | | | - Robinson Koji Tsuji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Ferreira Bento
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Macherey O, Stahl P, Intartaglia B, Meunier S, Roman S, Schön D. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements. Hear Res 2021; 403:108176. [PMID: 33524792 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
While electrically-evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) thresholds for low-rate pulse trains correlate well with behavioral thresholds measured at the same rate, the correlation is much weaker with behavioral thresholds measured at high rates, such as used clinically. This implies that eABRs to low-rate stimuli cannot be reliably used for objective programming of threshold levels in cochlear implant (CI) users. Here, we investigate whether the use of bunched-up pulses (BUPS), consisting of groups of closely-spaced pulses may be used as an alternative stimulus. Experiment 1 measured psychophysical detection thresholds for several stimuli having a period of 32 ms in nine CI subjects implanted with a Med-EL device. The stimuli differed in the number of pulses present in each period (from 1 to 32), the pulse rate within period (1000 pps and as high as possible for BUPS) and the electrode location (apical or basal). The correlation between psychophysical thresholds obtained for a high-rate (1000 pps) clinical stimulus and for the BUPS stimuli increased as the number of pulses per period of BUPS increased from 1 to 32. This first psychophysical experiment suggests that the temporal processes affecting the threshold of clinical stimuli are also present for BUPS. Experiment 2 measured eABRs on the apical electrode of eight CI subjects for BUPS having 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 pulses per period. For most subjects, wave V was visible for BUPS having up to 16 pulses per period. The latency of wave V at threshold increased as a function of the number of pulses per period, suggesting that the eABR reflects the integration of multiple pulses at such low levels or that the neural response to each individual pulse increases along the sequence due to facilitation processes. There was also a strong within-subject correlation between electrophysiological and behavioral thresholds for the different BUPS stimuli. This demonstrates that the drop in behavioral threshold obtained when increasing the number of pulses per period of the BUPS can be measured electrophysiologically using eABRs. In contrast, the across-subject correlation between eABR thresholds for BUPS and clinical thresholds remained relatively weak and did not increase with the number of pulses per period. Implications of the use of BUPS for objective programming of CIs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Macherey
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA, 4 Impasse Nikola Tesla, CS 40006, 13453 Marseille Cedex 13, France.
| | - Pierre Stahl
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA, 4 Impasse Nikola Tesla, CS 40006, 13453 Marseille Cedex 13, France
| | | | - Sabine Meunier
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA, 4 Impasse Nikola Tesla, CS 40006, 13453 Marseille Cedex 13, France
| | - Stéphane Roman
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France; Department Pediatric Otolaryngology and Neck Surgery, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Daniele Schön
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 22:121-127. [PMID: 33297872 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1850032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To measure the effect of burst duration, stimulated electrode position, and stimulation level on the P1-N1-P2 electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials (eCAEPs) elicited via the direct stimulation of selected electrode contacts on a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array.Methods: Prospective observational study of 20 adult cochlear implant users with a MED-EL CI system. eCAEPs were recorded simultaneously with the Eclipse (Interacoustics) and the Neuropack S1 MEB-9400 (Nihon Kohden) recording systems. Tone bursts with durations of 50, 100, and 150 ms were used for stimulation at the maximum comfortable loudness level (MCL) and MCL minus 50% dynamic range (DR) at selected apical, medial, and basal intracochlear electrodes.Results: Individual P1-N1 and N1-P2 amplitudes were significantly higher at the MCL level of stimulation than at the MCL minus 50% DR. Burst length and stimulated electrode position did not affect the eCAEP responses. Residual noise was lower in the Neuropack S1 MEB-9400 system.Conclusions: This study shows the feasibility of eCAEP recording using the MAESTRO software. The eCAEP morphology was independent of the burst duration and the stimulated electrode position. This allows a large flexibility in using direct cochlear stimulation to elicit eCAEPs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Choi SMS, Wong ECM, McPherson B. Aided cortical auditory evoked measures with cochlear implantees: the challenge of stimulus artefacts. HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/21695717.2019.1630982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy M. S. Choi
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Eddie C. M. Wong
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bradley McPherson
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mao D, Innes-Brown H, Petoe MA, Wong YT, McKay CM. Fully objective hearing threshold estimation in cochlear implant users using phase-locking value growth functions. Hear Res 2019; 377:24-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
19
|
BinKhamis G, Perugia E, O'Driscoll M, Kluk K. Speech-ABRs in cochlear implant recipients: feasibility study. Int J Audiol 2019; 58:678-684. [PMID: 31132012 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1619100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recording speech-ABRs from cochlear implant (CI) recipients, and to remove the artefact using a clinically applicable single-channel approach. Design: Speech-ABRs were recorded to a 40 ms [da] presented via loudspeaker using a two-channel electrode montage. Additionally, artefacts were recorded using an artificial-head incorporating a MED-EL CI with stimulation parameters as similar as possible to those of three MED-EL participants. A single-channel artefact removal technique was applied to all responses. Study sample: A total of 12 adult CI recipients (6 Cochlear Nucleus and 6 MED-EL CIs). Results: Responses differed according to the CI type, artefact removal resulted in responses containing speech-ARB characteristics in two MED-EL CI participants; however, it was not possible to verify whether these were true responses or were modulated by artefacts, and artefact removal was successful from the artificial-head recordings. Conclusions: This is the first study that attempted to record speech-ABRs from CI recipients. Results suggest that there is a potential for application of a single-channel approach to artefact removal. However, a more robust and adaptive approach to artefact removal that includes a method to verify true responses is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada BinKhamis
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,King Fahad Medical City , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Emanuele Perugia
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| | - Martin O'Driscoll
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.,Manchester Auditory Implant Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK
| | - Karolina Kluk
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mao D, Innes-Brown H, Petoe MA, Wong YT, McKay CM. Cortical auditory evoked potential time-frequency growth functions for fully objective hearing threshold estimation. Hear Res 2018; 370:74-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing to the profoundly deaf by direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. To provide an optimal electrical stimulation pattern the CI must be individually fitted to each CI user. To date, CI fitting is primarily based on subjective feedback from the user. However, not all CI users are able to provide such feedback, for example, small children. This study explores the possibility of using the electroencephalogram (EEG) to objectively determine if CI users are able to hear differences in tones presented to them, which has potential applications in CI fitting or closed loop systems. DESIGN Deviant and standard stimuli were presented to 12 CI users in an active auditory oddball paradigm. The EEG was recorded in two sessions and classification of the EEG data was performed with shrinkage linear discriminant analysis. Also, the impact of CI artifact removal on classification performance and the possibility to reuse a trained classifier in future sessions were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, classification performance was above chance level for all participants although performance varied considerably between participants. Also, artifacts were successfully removed from the EEG without impairing classification performance. Finally, reuse of the classifier causes only a small loss in classification performance. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide first evidence that EEG can be automatically classified on single-trial basis in CI users. Despite the slightly poorer classification performance over sessions, classifier and CI artifact correction appear stable over successive sessions. Thus, classifier and artifact correction weights can be reused without repeating the set-up procedure in every session, which makes the technique easier applicable. With our present data, we can show successful classification of event-related cortical potential patterns in CI users. In the future, this has the potential to objectify and automate parts of CI fitting procedures.
Collapse
|
22
|
Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection. Ear Hear 2018; 37:634-649. [PMID: 27579988 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to (1) characterize morphological characteristics of the electrically evoked cortical auditory event-related potentials (eERPs) and explore the potential association between onset eERP morphology and auditory versus nonauditory stimulation; (2) assess test-retest reliability of onset eERPs; (3) investigate effects of stimulation level on onset eERPs; and (4) explore the feasibility of using the onset eERP to estimate the lowest stimulation level that can be detected for individual stimulating electrodes in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). DESIGN Study participants included 5 children (S1 to S5) and 2 adults (S6 to S7) with unilateral Cochlear Nucleus 24M ABIs. Pediatric ABI recipients ranged in age from 2.6 to 10.2 years (mean: 5.2 years) at the time of testing. S6 and S7 were 21.2 and 24.6 years of age at the time of testing, respectively. S6 and S7 were diagnosed with neurofibromatosis II (NF2) and implanted with an ABI after a surgical removal of the tumors. All pediatric subjects received ABIs after being diagnosed with cochlear nerve deficiency. The lowest stimulation level that could be detected (behavioral T level) and the estimated maximum comfortable level (C level) was measured for individual electrodes using clinical procedures. For electrophysiological measures, the stimulus was a 100-msec biphasic pulse train that was delivered to individual electrodes in a monopolar-coupled stimulation mode at stimulation levels ranging from subthreshold to C levels. Electrophysiological recordings of the onset eERP were obtained in all subjects. For studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of the onset eERP, responses were measured using the same set of parameters in two test sessions. The time interval between test sessions ranged from 2 to 6 months. The lowest stimulation level that could evoke the onset eERP was defined as the objective T level. RESULTS Onset eERPs were recorded in all subjects tested in this study. Inter- and intrasubject variations in morphological characteristics of onset eERPs were observed. Onset eERPs with complex waveforms were recorded for electrodes that evoked nonauditory sensations, based on feedback from subjects, as well as for electrodes without any indications of nonauditory stimulations. Onset eERPs in patients with ABIs demonstrated good test-retest reliability. Increasing stimulation levels resulted in increased eERP amplitudes but showed inconsistent effects on response latencies in patients with ABIs. Objective and behavioral T levels were correlated. CONCLUSIONS eERPs could be recorded in both non-NF2 and NF2 patients with ABIs. eERPs in both ABI patient groups show inter- and intrasubject variations in morphological characteristics. However, onset eERPs measured within the same subject in this study tended to be stable across study sessions. The onset eERP can potentially be used to estimate behavioral T levels in patients with ABIs. Further studies with more adult ABI recipients are warranted to investigate whether the onset eERP can be used to identify electrodes with nonauditory stimulations.
Collapse
|
23
|
Electrically-evoked auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2017; 358:22-29. [PMID: 29274947 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Loudness growth functions characterize how the loudness percept changes with current level between the threshold and most comfortable loudness level in cochlear implant users. Even though loudness growth functions are highly listener-dependent, currently default settings are used in clinical devices. This study investigated whether electrically-evoked auditory steady-state response amplitude growth functions correspond to behaviorally measured loudness growth functions. Seven cochlear implant listeners participated in two behavioral loudness growth tasks and an EEG recording session. The 40-Hz sinusoidally amplitude-modulated pulse trains were presented to CI channels stimulating at a more apical and basal region of the cochlea, and were presented at different current levels encompassing the listeners' dynamic ranges. Behaviorally, loudness growth was measured using an Absolute Magnitude Estimation and a Graphic Rating Scale with loudness categories. A good correspondence was found between the response amplitude functions and the behavioral loudness growth functions. The results are encouraging for future advances in individual, more automatic, and objective fitting of cochlear implants.
Collapse
|
24
|
Longitudinal Changes in Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: Preliminary Results Recorded Over 3 Years. Ear Hear 2017; 39:318-325. [PMID: 28891823 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This preliminary study aimed (1) to assess longitudinal changes in electrically evoked auditory event-related potentials (eERPs) in children with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) and (2) to explore whether these changes could be accounted for by maturation in the central auditory system of these patients. DESIGN Study participants included 5 children (S1 to S5) with an ABI in the affected ear. The stimulus was a train of electrical pulses delivered to individual ABI electrodes via a research interface. For each subject, the eERP was repeatedly measured in multiple test sessions scheduled over up to 41 months after initial device activation. Longitudinal changes in eERPs recorded for each ABI electrode were evaluated using intraclass correlation tests for each subject. RESULTS eERPs recorded in S1 showed notable morphological changes for five ABI electrodes over 41 months. In parallel, signs or symptoms of nonauditory stimulation elicited by these electrodes were observed or reported at 41 months. eERPs could not be observed in S2 after 9 months of ABI use but were recorded at 12 months after initial stimulation. Repeatable eERPs were recorded in S3 in the first 9 months. However, these responses were either absent or showed remarkable morphological changes at 30 months. Longitudinal changes in eERP waveform morphology recorded in S4 and S5 were also observed. CONCLUSIONS eERP responses in children with ABIs could change over a long period of time. Maturation of the central auditory system could not fully account for these observed changes. Children with ABIs need to be closely monitored for potential changes in auditory perception and unfavorable nonauditory sensations. Neuroimaging correlates are needed to better understand the emergence of nonauditory stimulation over time in these children.
Collapse
|
25
|
Characterization of Volume-Based Changes in Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials and Prepulse Inhibition. Sci Rep 2017; 7:11098. [PMID: 28894145 PMCID: PMC5593922 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11191-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The auditory evoked startle reflex is a conserved response resulting in neurological and motor activity. The presence of a mild prepulse immediately before the main pulse inhibits startle responses, though the mechanism for this remains unknown. In this study, the electroencephalography (EEG) data recorded from 15 subjects was analyzed to study the N1 and P2 components of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked by 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 dB stimuli both in the presence and absence of 70 dB prepulses. Results without a prepulse showed an evolution of N1 amplitudes, increasing with stimulus intensity and showing largely significant differences. Results from prepulse trials only showed noteworthy changes in peak-to-peak amplitude in the 100 dB condition. Prepulse and non-prepulse conditions were then compared using peak amplitudes and theta power. Prepulse conditions significantly decreased the amplitude for both components in the 110 dB condition, i.e., pre-pulse inhibition, but significantly increased the N1 amplitude in the 70 dB condition, i.e., pre-pulse facilitation. Similarly theta band power significantly increased in the 70 dB prepulse condition and significantly decreased in the 110 dB prepulse condition. These results expand the basis of knowledge regarding how CAEPs change and elaborate on their neural function and representation.
Collapse
|
26
|
The relation between ECAP measurements and the effect of rate on behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2017; 346:62-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|