Risk of contralateral lower limb amputation and death after initial lower limb amputation - a population-based study

Understanding transitions in care for persons with limb loss: a qualitative study exploring health care providers' perspectives

PURPOSE

To explore health care providers' (HCP) experiences related to transitions in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community for patients with limb loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Participants were eligible if they were HCPs currently working in amputation rehabilitation at a rehabilitation hospital in Ontario, Canada, with at least 1-year experience in this setting, and could speak and understand English. Data were analyzed thematically using the six-step process of the DEPICT model dynamic reading, engaged codebook development, participatory coding, inclusive reviewing and summarizing of categories, collaborative analyzing and translating.

RESULTS

Fourteen HCPs from a variety of health care professions participated in this study. Five key themes describe participants' perspectives on the factors impacting patients' transition in care following limb loss. Specifically, participants emphasized patient preparedness, HCP follow-up, finances and funding, patient self-management skills, and psychosocial support as factors that could influence the transition in care.

CONCLUSION

This study identified challenges to transitions in care for people with limb loss. Future research is needed to evaluate solutions to address these challenges in transitions in care.

Lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in a tertiary hospital in Togo: a retrospective analysis of clinical, biological, radiological, and therapeutic aspects

BACKGROUND

We analysed the clinical, biological, radiological profiles, and therapeutic patterns of the patients who underwent a surgical lower extremity amputation (LEA) in Togo from 2010 to 2020.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical files of adult patients who underwent an LEA at a single centre (Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital) from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2020. Data were analysed by CDC Epi Info Version 7 and Microsoft Office Excel 2013 software.

RESULTS

We included 245 cases. The mean age was 59.62 years (15.22 SD) (range: 15-90 years). The sex ratio was 1.99. The medical history of diabetes mellitus (DM) was found in 143/222 (64.41%) files. The amputation level found in 241/245 (98.37%) files was the leg in 133/241 (55.19%) patients, the knee in 14/241 (5.81%), the thigh in 83/241 (34.44%), and the foot in 11/241 (4.56%). The 143 patients with DM who underwent LEA had infectious and vascular diseases. Patients with previous LEAs were more likely to have the same limb affected than the contralateral one. The odds of trauma as an indication for LEA were twice as high in patients younger than 65 years compared to the older (OR = 2.095, 95% CI = 1.050-4.183). The mortality rate after LEA was 17/238 (7.14%). There was no significant difference between age, sex, presence or absence of DM, and early postoperative complications (P = 0.77; 0.96; 0.97). The mean duration of hospitalization marked in 241/245 (98.37%) files was 36.30 (1-278) days (36.20 SD). Patients with LEAs due to trauma had a significantly longer hospital admission than those with non-traumatic indications, F (3,237) = 5.505, P = 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to previous decades, from 2010 to 2020, the average incidence of LEAs for all causes at Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital (Lomé, Togo) decreased while the percentage of patients with DM who underwent LEAs increased. This setting imposes a multidisciplinary approach and information campaigns to prevent DM, cardiovascular diseases, and  relative complications.

Salami-Tactics: when is it time for a major cut after multiple minor amputations?

INTRODUCTION

Repetitive minor amputations carry the concomitant risks of multiple surgical procedures, major amputations have physical and economical major drawbacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a distinct number of minor amputations predicting a major amputation in the same leg and to determine risk factors for major amputation in multiple minor amputations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review including 429 patients with 534 index minor amputations between 07/1984 and 06/2019 was conducted. Patient demographics and clinical data including number and level of re-amputations were extracted from medical records and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

290 legs (54.3%) had one or multiple re-amputations after index minor amputation. 89 (16.7%) legs needed major amputation during follow up. Major amputation was performed at a mean of 32.5 (range 0 - 275.2) months after index minor amputation. No particular re-amputation demonstrated statistically significant elevated odds ratio (a.) to be a major amputation compared to the preceding amputation and (b.) to lead to a major amputation at any point during follow up. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed minor re-amputation within 90 days (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.0-7.3, p <0.001) as the only risk factor for major amputation if at least one re-amputation had to be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no distinct number of prior minor amputations in one leg that would justify a major amputation on its own. If a re-amputation has to be done, the timepoint needs to be considered as re-amputations within 90 days carry a fourfold risk for major amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study (Level III).

Temporal trends in major, minor and recurrent lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Belgium from 2009 to 2018

AIMS

This study assessed temporal trends in the incidence of lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Belgium from 2009 to 2018, and subsequent secondary amputation rates.

METHODS

Nationwide data on LEA were collected. Sex- and age-adjusted annual incidence rates were calculated. Time trends were analysed in negative binomial models. The incidence of secondary interventions, defined as either any ipsilateral reamputation or any contralateral amputation, was studied with death as competing risk.

RESULTS

41 304 amputations were performed (13 247 major, 28 057 minor). In individuals with diabetes, the amputation rate (first amputation per patient per year) decreased from 143.6/100.000 person-years to 109.7 (IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.98, p < 0.001). The incidence of major LEAs decreased from 56.2 to 30.7 (IRR 0.93, 95 %CI 0.91-0.94, p < 0.001); the incidence of minor amputations showed a non-significant declining trend in women (54.3 to 45.0/100 000 person years, IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.99), while this remained stable in men with diabetes (149.2 to 135.3/100 000 person years, IRR 1.00 per year, 95 %CI 0.98-1.01). In individuals without diabetes, the incidence of major amputation didn't change significantly, whereas minor amputation incidence increased (8.0 to 10.6, IRR 1.04, 95 %CI 1.03-1.05, p < 0.001). In individuals with diabetes, one-year secondary intervention rates were high (31.3% after minor, 18.4% after major LEA); the incidence of secondary amputations didn't change.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant decline in the incidence rate of major LEA was observed in people with diabetes. This decline was not accompanied by a significant rise in minor LEA. The incidence of secondary interventions remained stable.

Clinical factors and mortality rates for non-traumatic upper extremity amputations

Non-traumatic upper extremity amputations are an increasing concern with the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus. To ascertain the risk factors and mortality rates for these amputations, the demographic information, amputation history, comorbidities and clinical outcomes of 140 patients who underwent non-traumatic upper extremity amputations between 1 January 2004 and 31 October 2017 were studied. Correlations were assessed using Cochran-Armitage chi-squared tests, odds ratios and multivariate binomial logistic regression as appropriate. Diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, end-stage renal failure, peripheral arterial disease and prior lower extremity amputation were significant risk factors for multiple upper extremity amputations. One-year, 2-year and 5-year mortality rates were 12%, 15% and 38%, respectively, following first upper extremity amputation. The risk factors for upper extremity amputations correspond with those for lower extremity amputations, comprising mainly diabetes mellitus and its related comorbidities. The mortality rates for non-traumatic upper extremity amputations highlight their significant burden on patients.Level of evidence: III.

Factors associated with prolonged post-operative acute care length of stay in limb amputation patients in Saskatchewan, Canada

BACKGROUND

The effect of predisposing factors on post-operative acute care length of stay (POALOS) after lower extremity amputation (LEA) has been sparsely studied with reports largely focused on major (through/proximal to the ankle) LEA specifically due to diabetes mellitus (DM). Although valuable, the narrow focus disregards the impact of other causes and minor levels (distal to the ankle) of LEA. To address this gap, this study aimed to identify predisposing factors associated with prolonged POALOS after index LEA stratified by amputation level in Saskatchewan.

METHODS

The study used Saskatchewan's provincial linked administrative health data and demographic factors between 2006 and 2019. Amputation levels, identified as major or minor, were derived from the amputation procedure codes. POALOS was calculated by subtracting patients' intervention date from discharge date, recorded in days, and categorized as short (< 7 days) or prolonged (> 7 days). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors associated with prolonged POALOS.

RESULTS

Of the 3123 LEA cases 1421 (45.5%) had prolonged POALOS. The median POALOS for the entire cohort was 7 days (IQR 3 to 16 days); 5 days (IQR 1 to 10 days) for minor LEA and 11 days (IQR 5 to 23 days) for major LEA. Predictors of prolonged POALOS after minor LEA were diabetes (AOR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.87-3.27) and general surgeon (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.21-1.91). Minor LEA performed by orthopedic surgeons were half (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.70) as likely to experience prolonged POALOS. Predictors of prolonged POALOS after major LEA were diabetes (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.04-1.71), general surgeon (AOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.45-2.49), urban residence (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.25-1.99), Resident Indian (RI) status (AOR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.15-2.15), and age with the likelihood of prolonged POALOS after LEA attenuating with increasing age: 35-54 years (AOR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.56-4.76); 55-69 years (AOR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.54-4.58); and 70+ years (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.05-3.11).

CONCLUSION

This study identified only diabetes and surgical specialty predicted prolonged POALOS after both major and minor LEA in Saskatchewan while residence, RI status, and age were predictors of POALOS after major LEA. These findings shed light on the need for further research to identify confounding factors. It is not clear if general surgeons care for more unplanned, emergent cases with poor entry-level health while specialty surgeons perform more scheduled procedures.

Features of asymptomatic contralateral limb in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to reveal clinical features and prognosis of asymptomatic contralateral limbs in patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

We analyzed a database of 520 CLTI patients registered in a prospective, multicenter registry in Japan. Severe ischemia in asymptomatic contralateral limbs was determined as the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system Ischemia (I) grade 2/3.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and dialysis-dependent renal failure was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively. Asymptomatic limbs accounted for 65.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 60.9-69.1%] of the overall population, and 55.0% (95% CI, 49.6-60.4%) of the asymptomatic contralateral limbs had WIfI I-2/3. The multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 years, dialysis-dependent renal failure, WIfI I-3 in the index limb, and loss of pressure sensation in the contralateral limb as independent risk factors for WIfI I-2/3 in asymptomatic contralateral limbs (all p < 0.05). The 3-year cumulative incidence rate of major adverse limb events (MALE) in asymptomatic contralateral limbs was 19.3% (95% CI, 15.1-23.7%), whereas that of all-cause mortality was 46.9% (95% CI, 41.0-52.5%). The corresponding rate including a composite of mortality and MALE was 58.8% (95% CI, 52.9-64.6%). In asymptomatic contralateral limbs, the adjusted hazard ratio of WIfI I-2/3 versus I-0/1 was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.11-2.10) for a composite of mortality and MALE, 1.96 (95% CI, 1.14-3.36) for MALE, and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.95-1.96) for mortality (p = 0.009, 0.015, and 0.091, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of CLTI patients had an asymptomatic contralateral limb, and approximately half of the asymptomatic contralateral limbs were exposed to severe ischemia. Older age, dialysis-dependent renal failure, WIfI I-3 in the index limb, and loss of pressure sensation in the contralateral limb were independently associated with severe ischemia in asymptomatic contralateral limbs. In addition to mortality, MALE commonly occurred in asymptomatic contralateral limbs, especially with WIfI I-2/3.

Long Term Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients With Non-Revascularisable Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide long term survival and limb salvage rates for patients with non-revascularisable (NR) chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, derived from a randomised controlled trial (JUVENTAS) investigating the use of a regenerative cell therapy. Survival and limb salvage of the index limb in CLTI patients without viable options for revascularisation at inclusion were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was amputation free survival, a composite of survival and limb salvage, at five years after inclusion in the original trial.

RESULTS

In 150 patients with NR-CLTI, amputation free survival was 43% five years after inclusion. This outcome was driven by an equal rate of all cause mortality (35%) and amputation (33%). Amputation occurred predominantly in the first year. Furthermore, 33% of those with amputation subsequently died within the investigated period, with a median interval of 291 days.

CONCLUSION

Five years after the initial need for revascularisation, about half of the CLTI patients who were deemed non-revascularisable survived with salvage of the index limb. Although the prospects for these high risk patients are still poor, under optimal medical care, amputation free survival seems comparable with that of revascularisable CLTI patients, while the major amputation rate within one year, especially among NR-CLTI patients with ischaemic tissue loss, is very high.

A walking bout reveals altered foot thermodynamics associated with unilateral transtibial amputation among individuals with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Increased foot temperature among individuals with type 2 diabetes can be predictive of diabetic foot ulcer development. A combination of physiological and mechanical deficiencies may contribute to elevations in intact foot temperature during gait for individuals with type 2 diabetes and transtibial amputation.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated plantar foot temperature differences between individuals with type 2 diabetes with and without transtibial amputation. We hypothesized that individuals with transtibial amputation maintain increased foot temperature compared to those without amputation.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, case control.

METHODS

A sample of 16 participants with type 2 diabetes and transtibial amputation, and 16 age- and sex-matched participants with type 2 diabetes without amputation were recruited. Foot temperatures were measured during resting, walking, and cooldown periods. Peak temperature, mean temperature, and rate of temperature change were analyzed for each period, and compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

Participants with amputation exhibited increased mean foot temperature while at rest and during walking. Participants without amputation exhibited increased rate of change of foot temperature during walking. No differences in peak temperature or rate of temperature change were observed during the baseline or cooldown periods.

CONCLUSION

The current findings of altered foot temperature for individuals with transtibial amputation and type 2 diabetes suggest a possible reason for the high rates of contralateral limb ulceration and amputation among this population.

Rehabilitation Nursing Challenges for Patients With Lower Limb Amputation

ABSTRACT

There are over 185,000 amputations annually in the United States, and most of these patients will receive a short inpatient rehabilitation hospital stay as part of their recovery. Complications in care after amputation can negatively impact rehabilitation and subsequent disposition and community reintegration after discharge. The purpose of this article is to discuss the literature, significance, and practice recommendations for three specific challenges-skin integrity, postamputation pain, and falls. The focus population is rehabilitation patients who have undergone nontraumatic, lower limb amputation. Information about the incidence and risks of these complications give nurses necessary knowledge to improve care delivery, reduce suffering, and improve patient safety for postamputation patients during inpatient rehabilitation.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Below-Knee Amputation: A Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Reports of amputations associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been inconsistent. We aimed to compare the risk of below-knee amputation with SGLT2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This multicenter observational study used administrative health care databases from seven Canadian provinces and the U.K. Incident SGLT2 inhibitor users were matched to DPP-4 inhibitor users using a prevalent new-user design and time-conditional propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate site-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% CIs of incident below-knee amputation for SGLT2 inhibitor versus DPP-4 inhibitor users. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool the site-specific results.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 207,817 incident SGLT2 inhibitor users matched to 207,817 DPP-4 inhibitor users. During a mean exposed follow-up time of 11 months, the amputation rate was 1.3 per 1,000 person-years among SGLT2 inhibitor users and 1.5 per 1,000 person-years among DPP-4 inhibitor users. The adjusted HR of below-knee amputations associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use compared with DPP-4 inhibitor use was 0.88 (95% CI 0.71-1.09). Similar results were obtained in stratified analyses by specific SGLT2 inhibitor molecule.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multicenter observational study, there was no association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and incident below-knee amputations among patients with type 2 diabetes compared with DPP-4 inhibitor use. While these findings provide some reassurance, studies with a longer duration of follow-up are needed to assess potential long-term effects.

Risk factors for reamputations in patients amputated after revascularization for critical limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Despite vascular intervention, patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have a high risk of amputation. Furthermore, this group has a high risk for stump complications and reamputation. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors predicting reamputation after a major lower limb amputation in patients revascularized because of CLTI. The secondary aim was to investigate mortality after major lower limb amputation.

METHODS

There were 288 patients who underwent a major ipsilateral amputation after revascularization because of CLTI in Stockholm, Sweden, during 2007 to 2013. The main outcome was ipsilateral reamputation.

RESULTS

Of 288 patients, 50 patients had a reamputation and 222 died during the 11-year follow-up. Patients with ischemic pain as an indication for primary amputation had nearly four times higher risk for a reamputation compared with those with a nonhealing ulcer (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.55; confidence interval, 1.55-8.17). Higher age was associated with an increased risk for death in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.03; confidence interval, 1.02-1.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ischemic pain as an indication for amputation have an elevated risk of reamputation. Ischemic pain may be indicative of a more extensive and proximal ischemia compared with patients with foot tissue loss. An extended evaluation of the preoperative circulation before amputation may facilitate the choice of amputation level and could lead to a reduction of reamputations.

Identifying priorities and developing strategies for building capacity in amputation research in Canada

BACKGROUND

Compared to other patient population groups, the field of amputation research in Canada lacks cohesion largely due to limited funding sources, lack of connection among research scientists, and loose ties among geographically dispersed healthcare centres, research institutes and advocacy groups. As a result, advances in clinical care are hampered and ultimately negatively influence outcomes of persons living with limb loss.

OBJECTIVE

To stimulate a national strategy on advancing amputation research in Canada, a consensus-workshop was organized with an expert panel of stakeholders to identify key research priorities and potential strategies to build researcher and funding capacity in the field.

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used to gain consensus on identifying and selecting an initial set of priorities for building research capacity in the field of amputation. This included an anonymous pre-meeting survey (N = 31 respondents) followed by an in-person consensus-workshop meeting that hosted 38 stakeholders (researchers, physiatrists, surgeons, prosthetists, occupational and physical therapists, community advocates, and people with limb loss).

RESULTS

The top three identified research priorities were: (1) developing a national dataset; (2) obtaining health economic data to illustrate the burden of amputation to the healthcare system and to patients; and (3) improving strategies related to outcome measurement in patients with limb loss (e.g. identifying, validating, and/or developing outcome measures). Strategies for moving these priorities into action were also developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus-workshop provided an initial roadmap for limb loss research in Canada, and the event served as an important catalyst for stakeholders to initiate collaborations for moving identified priorities into action. Given the increasing number of people undergoing an amputation, there needs to be a stronger Canadian collaborative approach to generate the necessary research to enhance evidence-based clinical care and policy decision-making.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLimb loss is a growing concern across North America, with lower-extremity amputations occurring due to complications arising from diabetes being a major cause.To advance knowledge about limb loss and to improve clinical care for this population, stronger connections are needed across the continuum of care (acute, rehabilitation, community) and across sectors (clinical, advocacy, industry and research).There are new surgical techniques, technologies, and rehabilitation approaches being explored to improve the health, mobility and community participation of people with limb loss, but further research evidence is needed to demonstrate efficacy and to better integrate them into standard clinical care.