Vemurafenib induces a noncanonical senescence-associated secretory phenotype in melanoma cells which promotes vemurafenib resistance

Histone deacetylases in the regulation of cell death and survival mechanisms in resistant BRAF-mutant cancers

Small-molecule BRAF inhibitors (e.g., vemurafenib and dabrafenib) and MEK (MAPK/ERK) kinases inhibitors (e.g., trametinib) have distinctly improved the survival of patients suffering from BRAF-mutant cancers such as melanomas. However, the emergence of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitor-based melanoma therapy, as well as the reduced sensitivity of other BRAF-mutant cancers such as CRC, poses a considerable clinical problem. For instance, the reactivation of MAPK/ERK signaling hampering cell death induction mechanisms was responsible for BRAF inhibitor resistance, which can be correlated with distinct post-translational and epigenetic processes. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are prominent epigenetic drug targets and some HDAC inhibitors have already been clinically approved for the therapy of various blood cancers. In addition, several HDACs were identified, which also play a crucial role in the drug resistance of BRAF-mutant cancers. Consequently, inhibition of HDACs was described as a promising approach to overcome resistance. This review summarizes the influence of HDACs (Zn2+-dependent HDACs and NAD+-dependent sirtuins) on BRAF-mutant cancers and BRAF inhibitor resistance based on upregulated survival mechanisms and the prevention of tumor cell death. Moreover, it outlines reasonable HDAC-based strategies to circumvent BRAF-associated resistance mechanisms based on downregulated cell death mechanisms.

Histopathologic and Molecular Insights Following the Management of Ameloblastomas via Targeted Therapies - Pathological and Clinical Perspectives

PURPOSE

Current standard of care for ameloblastoma (conventional/unicystic - mural type) usually mandates extensive bone resection that frequently necessitates immediate reconstruction with serious sequelae, especially among young patients. BRAF-mutated ameloblastomas can be targeted by BRAF inhibitors to markedly reduce their size, enabling conservative removal of residual tumor. We aimed to characterize the effect of post-treatment histomorphologic changes.

METHODS

Study included 14 patients, 11 mandibular and three maxillary tumors. Cases with very minimal residual tumor were defined as near-complete response, while those with mostly vital residual tumor as partial response. The epithelium component was scored for architectural and cellular changes, stroma - for fibrosis, inflammation and new bone formation, on a 3-tired score system: 0-no, 1-focal and 3-frequent changes. The mean scores of each parameter, total epithelium and total stroma were calculated and related to duration of treatment. Differences in the mean scores were investigated for mandibular tumors with near-complete response (n = 3) and partial response (n = 8).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean epithelium or stroma scores between tumors with near-complete and those with partial response (2.22 ± 0.68 versus 2.08 ± 0.43, p = 0.55; 1.41 ± 1.04 versus 1.43 ± 0.44, p = 0.27), suggesting that ameloblastomas have potential to undergo complete response to targeted treatment. This is probably dependent upon tumor/patient/treatment-related factors. Response to treatment appears to be predictable with neoplastic epithelium being first, while the stromal response increases during treatment, the entire process expanding over weeks-to-months.

CONCLUSION

Albeit preliminary, these are the first comprehensive histomorphologic findings on BRAF-treated ameloblastomas. Analyzing the suggested parameters in tumors with partial response, should highlight which tumor component has responded/failed to respond. This could serve as a basis for decision-taking toward subsequent steps in adjuvant treatment (e.g., follow-up, conservative surgery, modifications/changes in treatment regimen, combinations of approaches), with a prime aim of jaw preservation and minimal risk of sequelae.

Mechanisms of Melanoma Progression and Treatment Resistance: Role of Cancer Stem-like Cells

Melanoma is the third most common type of skin cancer, characterized by its heterogeneity and propensity to metastasize to distant organs. Melanoma is a heterogeneous tumor, composed of genetically divergent subpopulations, including a small fraction of melanoma-initiating cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) and many non-cancer stem cells (non-CSCs). CSCs are characterized by their unique surface proteins associated with aberrant signaling pathways with a causal or consequential relationship with tumor progression, drug resistance, and recurrence. Melanomas also harbor significant alterations in functional genes (BRAF, CDKN2A, NRAS, TP53, and NF1). Of these, the most common are the BRAF and NRAS oncogenes, with 50% of melanomas demonstrating the BRAF mutation (BRAFV600E). While the successful targeting of BRAFV600E does improve overall survival, the long-term efficacy of available therapeutic options is limited due to adverse side effects and reduced clinical efficacy. Additionally, drug resistance develops rapidly via mechanisms involving fast feedback re-activation of MAPK signaling pathways. This article updates information relevant to the mechanisms of melanoma progression and resistance and particularly the mechanistic role of CSCs in melanoma progression, drug resistance, and recurrence.