Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing of busulfan differs from weight-based dosing in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

Simulation-Based Optimization of Sampling Schedules for Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Once-Daily and 4-Times-Daily Busulfan in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is crucial in optimizing the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by guiding busulfan (Bu) dosing. Limited sampling strategies show promise for efficiently adjusting drug doses. However, comprehensive assessments and optimization of sampling schedules for Bu TDM in pediatric patients are limited. We aimed to establish optimal sampling designs for model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of once-daily (q24h) and 4-times-daily (q6h) Bu administration in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Simulated data sets were used to evaluate the population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian estimation of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for different limited sampling strategy designs. The evaluation was based on the mean prediction error for accuracy and root mean square error for precision. These findings were validated using patient-observed data. In addition, the MIPD protocol was implemented in the Tucuxi software, and its performance was assessed.

RESULTS

Our Bayesian estimation approach allowed for flexible sampling times while maintaining mean prediction error within ±5% and root mean square error below 10%. Accurate and precise AUC0-24h and cumulative AUC estimations were obtained using 2-sample and single-sample schedules for q6h and q24h dosing, respectively. TDM on 2 separate days was necessary to accurately estimate cumulative exposure, especially in patients receiving q6h Bu. Validation with observed patient data confirmed the precision of the proposed limited sampling scenarios. Implementing the MIPD protocol in Tucuxi software yielded reliable AUC estimations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study successfully established precise limited sampling protocols for MIPD of Bu in pediatric patients. Our findings underscore the importance of TDM on at least 2 occasions to accurately achieve desired Bu exposures. The developed MIPD protocol and its implementation in Tucuxi software provide a valuable tool for routine TDM in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation with Pharmacogenetic Insights Support the Relevance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Myeloablative Busulfan Dosing in Adult HSCT

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (Bu) is well-established in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its use in adults is limited due to a lack of clear recommendations and scarcity of evidence regarding its utility. GSTA1 promoter variants are reported to affect Bu clearance in both adults and pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the value of preemptive genotyping GSTA1 and body composition (obesity) in individualizing Bu dosing in adults, through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed and validated with data from 60 adults who underwent HSCT. Simulations assessed different dosing scenarios based on body size metrics and GSTA1 genotypes. Due to the limited number of obese patients in the cohort, the effect of obesity on Bu pharmacokinetics (PK) was evaluated in silico using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and relevant virtual populations from Simcyp software. Patients with at least 1 GSTA1*B haplotype had 17% lower clearance on average. PopPK simulations indicated that adjusting doses based on genotype increased the probability of achieving the target exposure (3.7 to 5.5 mg.h/L) from 53% to 60 % in GSTA1*A homozygous patients, and from 50% to 61% in *B carriers. Still, Approximately 40% of patients would not achieve this therapeutic window without TDM. A 2-sample optimal design was validated for routine model-based Bu first dose AUC0-∞ estimation, and the model was implemented in the Tucuxi user-friendly TDM software. PBPK simulations confirmed body surface area-based doses of 29 to 31 mg/m2/6h as the most appropriate, regardless of obesity status. This study emphasizes the importance of individualized Bu dosing strategies in adults to achieve therapeutic targets. Preemptive genotyping alone may not have a significant clinical impact, and routine TDM may be necessary for optimal transplantation outcomes.

Management of transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT): Expert insights and practical overview from the Middle East

β-Thalassemia is one of the most common monogenetic diseases worldwide, with a particularly high prevalence in the Middle East region. As such, we have developed long-standing experience with disease management and devising solutions to address challenges attributed to resource limitations. The region has also participated in the majority of clinical trials and development programs of iron chelators and more novel ineffective erythropoiesis-targeted therapy. In this review, we provide a practical overview of management for patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, primarily driven by such experiences, with the aim of transferring knowledge to colleagues in other regions facing similar challenges.

Limited Sampling Strategy Using End of Infusion and Six-Hour Concentrations Overestimates Intravenous Busulfan Clearance Compared With Standard Six-Point Sampling in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring for busulfan (Bu) is important to improve outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, standard therapeutic drug monitoring requires multiple samples and is inconvenient, labor-intensive, and costly. Accordingly, a limited sampling strategy (LSS) was evaluated, using 2-point sampling at end of infusion and at 6 hours, and the area-under-the-curve and Bu clearances (CLs) were compared with the results obtained from the standard sampling strategy (SSS) using 5-6 samples.

METHOD

The analysis was based on retrospective clinical data from 202 patients receiving intravenous Bu before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for malignant or nonmalignant conditions. Bu plasma concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the PKCNA package in R program.

RESULT

A total of 502 doses were analyzed by applying SSS and LSS. Using the modified Bland-Altman plot, the mean percentage difference in CL between the SSS and LSS estimates of Bu 6-hourly regimen was -41% (Limits: -53% and -30%). In the once daily regimen, the mean difference in CL between the 2 strategies on the modified Bland-Altman plot was -22% (Limits: -66% and +22%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Bu CL values estimated based on the BU concentration at end of infusion and at 6 hours postinfusion were significantly higher than the values obtained via the SSS.

Individualizing busulfan dose in specific populations and evaluating the risk of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions

INTRODUCTION

Busulfan is an alkylating agent widely used in the conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation possessing a complex metabolism and a large interindividual and intra-individual variability, especially in children. Combined with the strong rationale of busulfan PK/PD relationships, factors altering its clearance (e.g., weight, age, and GST-A genetic polymorphism mainly) can also affect clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on busulfan pharmacokinetics, its pharmacokinetics variabilities in pediatric populations, drug-drug interactions (DDI), and their consequences regarding dose individualization. This review was based on medical literature up until October 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

To ensure effective busulfan exposure in pediatrics, different weight-based nomograms have been established to determine busulfan dosage and provided improved results (65 - 80% of patients correctly exposed). In addition to nomograms, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan measuring plasmatic concentrations to estimate busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters can be used. TDM is now widely carried out in routine practices and aims to ensure the targeting of the reported therapeutic windows by individualizing busulfan dosing based on the clearance estimations from a previous dose.

Impact of valproic acid on busulfan pharmacokinetics: In vitro assessment of potential drug-drug interaction

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent commonly used at high doses in the preparative regimens of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It has been shown that such high doses of Bu are associated with generalized seizures which are usually managed by prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as valproic acid (VPA). Being a strong enzyme inhibitor, VPA may inhibit Bu metabolism and thus increase its potential toxicity. Despite its clinical relevance, the potential interaction between Bu and VPA has not yet been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to assess and evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between Bu and VPA. This study was carried out by incubating Bu in laboratory-prepared rat liver-subcellular fractions including S9, microsomes, and cytosol, alone or in combination with VPA. The liver fractions were prepared by differential centrifugation of the liver homogenate. Analysis of Bu was employed using a fully validated LC-MS/MS method. The validation parameters were within the proposed limits of the international standards guidelines. Bu metabolic stability was assessed by incubating Bu at a concentration of 8 μg/ml in liver fractions at 37°C. There were significant reductions in Bu levels in S9 and cytosolic fractions, whereas these levels were not significantly (P ˃ 0.05) changed in microsomes. However, in presence of VPA, Bu levels in S9 fraction remained unchanged. These results indicated, for the first time, the potential metabolic interaction of Bu and VPA being in S9 only. This could be explained by inhibiting Bu cytosolic metabolism by the interaction with VPA either by sharing the same metabolic enzyme or the required co-factor. In conclusion, the present findings suggest, for the first time, a potential DDI between Bu and VPA in vitro using rat liver fractions. Further investigations are warranted in human-derived liver fractions to confirm such an interaction.

Impact of Glutathione S-Transferase Polymorphisms on Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating drug used in many preparative regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is conjugated in the liver mainly by glutathione S-transferase isoenzyme A1-1 ( GSTA1 ). Genetic polymorphisms in these isoenzymes may affect the pharmacokinetics of Bu and the clinical outcomes of HSCT. This study aimed to assess the impact of glutathione S-transferase ( GST ) genetic polymorphisms on the clearance of Bu and the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing HSCT.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients who received IV Bu before HSCT at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), Oman from January 2003 to October 2016. Genotyping for polymorphisms was performed for GSTM1 , GSTT1 , GSTA1 , and GSTP1 . Each GST polymorphism was analyzed for its impact on Bu clearance and HSCT outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included. The mean Bu clearance was 3.7 ± 0.98 mL/min/kg. Patients with GSTA1 A-513G heterozygosity (AG) were found to have a higher incidence of graft loss ( P = 0.006). Homozygous double null of GSTM1 and GSTT1 was associated with a higher incidence of acute graft versus host disease ( P = 0.04). Double non-null GSTM1 and GSTT1 and non-null GSTM1 increased the risk of mortality ( P = 0.034 and 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

GST genotyping before HSCT may predict HSCT outcomes. The results of this preliminary retrospective study need to be confirmed in a larger prospective study.

Iron Chelation With Deferasirox Increases Busulfan AUC During Conditioning Chemotherapy Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

The negative effects of iron overload caused by repetitive blood transfusions and iron release during cytotoxic chemotherapy might be ameliorated by early treatment with an iron chelator. However, in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), chelation therapy is often postponed until the late post-transplantation period because of potential drug interactions. We wanted to systematically investigate the influence of iron chelation with deferasirox on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in adult patients in the context of routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) before HSCT. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study in 25 adult patients with planned allogeneic HSCT after myeloablative, busulfan-based, TDM-guided conditioning chemotherapy. Busulfan was administered intravenously over 3 hours with an initial dose of 3.2 mg/kg once daily (based on adjusted ideal body weight [AIBW] in overweight patients). Four consecutive dosages were planned to achieve a cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of 80 mg · h/L. Patients received deferasirox for transfusional iron overload as per approval from the start of conditioning until day 3 after transplantation. Model-based calculation of the busulfan AUC was carried out by means of Bayesian prediction based on a population pharmacokinetic model after the first or second dose of busulfan, and dose adjustments were performed accordingly. Calculated median cumulative AUC before dose adjustment was 93.7 mg · h/L (65.1-151.4 mg · h/L), which was considerably above the target AUC of 80 mg · h/L ± 10%. Median dose adjustment was -17.1% (-50.0% to 18.2%), and patients ultimately received busulfan with a median cumulative dose of 10.60 mg/kg (6.38-15.62 mg/kg). A busulfan dose reduction was necessary in 19 patients (76%) whereas a dose increase was only necessary in 1 patient. After dose adjustment the median AUC was 79.7 mg/L · h (62.5 - 84.2 mg/L · h). Median busulfan clearance was 0.134 L/h/kg (0.084-0.203 L/h/kg), which is significantly lower than the average clearance of 0.2 L/h/kg reported in the literature, whereas volume of distribution was not altered. We were able to demonstrate, that TDM is the key point to facilitate a safe co-administration of both medications, because the intake of deferasirox leads to a considerable increase in the busulfan AUC of about 35% to 40%. The reason for the increase in busulfan AUC is a reduction in busulfan clearance by about one third; therefore a lower initial dose of busulfan followed by TDM could be considered in this case.

Evaluation of the Robustness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Coupled with Bayesian Forecasting of Busulfan with Regard to Inaccurate Documentation

Background

Inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion times is a potential source of error in personalizing busulfan doses using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Planned times rather than the actual times for sampling and infusion time are often documented.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of a limited sampling TDM of busulfan with regard to inaccurate documentation.

Methods

A pharmacometric analysis was conducted in NONMEM® 7.4.3 and “R” by performing stochastic simulation and estimation with four, two and one sample(s) per patient on the basis of a one-compartment- (1CMT) and two-compartment (2CMT) population pharmacokinetic model. The dosing regimens consisted of i.v. busulfan (0.8 mg/kg) every 6 h (Q6H) or 3.2 mg/kg every 24 h (Q24H) with a 2 h- and 3 h infusion time, respectively. The relative prediction error (rPE) and relative root-mean-square error (rRmse) were calculated in order to determine the accuracy and precision of the individual AUC estimation.

Results

A noticeable impact on the estimated AUC based on a 1CMT-model was only observed if uncertain documentation reached ± 30 min (1.60% for Q24H and 2.19% for Q6H). Calculated rPEs and rRmse for Q6H indicate a slightly lower level of accuracy and precision when compared to Q24H. Spread of rPE’s and rRmse for the 2CMT-model were wider and higher compared to estimations based on a 1CMT-model.

Conclusions

The estimated AUC was not affected substantially by inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion time. The calculated rPEs and rRmses of estimated AUC indicate robustness and reliability for TDM of busulfan, even in presence of erroneous records.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11095-021-03115-8.

Dose individualization of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: impact and in vitro evaluation of infusion lag-time

OBJECTIVES

To apply therapeutic drug monitoring and dose-individualization of intravenous Busulfan to paediatric patients and evaluate the impact of syringe-pump induced Busulfan infusion lag-time after in vitro estimation.

METHODS

76 children and adolescents were administered 2 h intravenous Busulfan infusion every 6 h (16 doses). Busulfan plasma levels, withdrawn by an optimized sampling scheme and measured by a validated HPLC-PDA method, were used to estimate basic PK parameters, AUC, Cmax, kel, t1/2, applying Non-Compartmental Analysis. In vivo infusion lag-time was simulated in vitro and used to evaluate its impact on AUC estimation.

KEY FINDINGS

Mean (%CV) Busulfan AUC, Cmax, clearance and t1/2 for pediatric population were found 962.3 μm × min (33.1), 0.95 mg/L (41.4), 0.27 L/h/kg (33.3), 2.2 h (27.8), respectively. TDM applied to 76 children revealed 6 (7.9%) being above and 25 (32.9%) below therapeutic-range (AUC: 900-1350 μm × min). After dose correction, all patients were measured below toxic levels (AUC < 1500 μm × min), no patient below 900 μm × min. Incorporation of infusion lag-time revealed lower AUCs with 17.1% more patients and 23.1% more younger patients, with body weight <16 kg, being below the therapeutic-range.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM, applied successfully to 76 children, confirmed the need for Busulfan dose-individualization in paediatric patients. Infusion lag-time was proved clinically significant for younger, low body-weight patients and those close to the lower therapeutic-range limit.

Dried Plasma Spots and Oral Fluid as Alternative Matrices for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Busulfan: Analytical Method Development and Clinical Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Busulfan (BU) is an alkylating agent with a narrow therapeutic index and high intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability used in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring BU exposure during high-dose conditioning regimens is recommended and positively impacts outcomes. We aimed to develop, validate, and apply a ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assay to measure BU concentrations in oral fluid and dried plasma spots (DPS) as alternative matrices to plasma.

METHODS

We prepared plasma and oral fluid samples by protein precipitation and DPS after liquid extraction. We analyzed extracts using an LC-MS/MS system with an Acquity HSS T3 column in the positive electrospray ionization mode. The method was validated and applied to 79 paired plasma and oral fluid samples from 7 patients on BU conditioning treatment. DPS were prepared by pipetting plasma onto Whatman 903 paper. The correlation between BU in plasma, oral fluid, and DPS samples was evaluated.

RESULTS

Run time was 4.0 minutes. The assay was linear at 50-5000 ng mL-1 (r > 0.99), precise (1.9%-5.3% oral fluid and 1.8%-5.9% DPS), and accurate (98.1%-108.9% oral fluid and 93%-103.1% DPS). BU was stable in DPS at 23°C for 24 hours. BU levels in oral fluid (r = 0.927) and DPS (r = 0.982) were significantly correlated with plasma. Despite the good correlation, we found a wide variation between oral fluid and plasma levels. The area under curves (AUCs) calculated with oral fluid concentrations were 79.1%-167.1% of plasma AUCs. Bland-Altman plots found a better agreement for DPS, with AUCs estimated from corrected DPS levels at 83.1%-114.1% of plasma values.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a simple and fast ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS assay to measure BU in oral fluid and DPS. The results do not support the use of oral fluid as a matrix for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of BU. The AUC estimated from BU measurements in DPS was comparable to that in plasma, supporting the use of DPS in BU therapeutic drug monitoring as an alternative matrix, with adequate short-term stability and logistic advantages.

Busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone conditioning regimen after bortezomib based triplet induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Background:

High dose melphalan (HDMEL) is considered the standard conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Recent studies showed superiority of busulfan plus melphalan (BUMEL) compared to HDMEL as a conditioning regimen. We compared the efficacy of HDMEL and BUMEL in newly diagnosed Asian MM patients, who are often underrepresented.

Methods:

This is a single-center, retrospective study including MM patients who underwent ASCT after bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) triplet induction chemotherapy between January 2015 and August 2019.

Result:

In the end, 79 patients in the HDMEL group were compared to 31 patients in the BUMEL group. There were no differences between the two groups with regards to sex, age at ASCT, risk group, and stage. The HDMEL group showed better response to pre-transplant VTD compared to BUMEL, but after ASCT the BUMEL group showed better overall response. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), although BUMEL showed trends towards better PFS regardless of pre-transplant status and age, the difference did not reach statistical significance. The BUMEL group more often experienced mucositis related to chemotherapy, but there was no difference between the two groups with regards to hospitalization days, cell engraftment, and infection rates.

Conclusion:

BUMEL conditioning deserves attention as the alternative option to HDMEL for newly diagnosed MM patients, even in the era of triplet induction chemotherapy. Specifically, patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better response with triplet induction chemotherapy might benefit the most from BUMEL conditioning. Tailored conditioning regimen, based on patient’s response to induction chemotherapy and co-morbidities, can lead to better treatment outcomes.

Applications and challenges in therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer treatment: A review

Most anticancer agents show wide variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and have a narrow therapeutic index which makes fixed dosing suboptimal. To achieve the best therapeutic outcomes with these agents, many studies have postulated using PK or therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing. However, multiple factors contribute to the variability in PKs making the application of TDM in practice challenging. Also, despite the known association with clinical outcomes, standard guidelines on PK-guided dosing are lacking for most agents. Understanding the factors that contribute to PK variability and their impact is essential for dose individualization. The purpose of this review is to discuss the factors that contribute to the PK variability of anticancer agents and the challenges faced in practice when individualizing doses for certain widely used agents. Searching the literature has identified several gaps and efforts are needed to ensure better targeting of cancer therapeutics.

New dosing nomogram and population pharmacokinetic model for young and very young children receiving busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning

BACKGROUND

Busulfan (Bu) is the cornerstone of conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, widely used in both adults and children for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite an intravenous formulation, interindividual variability (IIV) remains high and optimal exposure difficult to achieve, especially in neonates and infants.

PROCEDURE

To ensure both efficacy and safety, we set up in 2005 an observational study designed for children not fully assessed during the drug registration procedure. From a large cohort of 540 patients, we developed a Bu population pharmacokinetic model based on body weight (BW) and maturation concepts to reduce IIV and optimize exposure. A new dosing nomogram was evaluated to better fit the population pharmacokinetic model.

RESULTS

Bu clearance IIV was significantly decreased from 61.3% (covariate-free model) to 28.6% when combining BW and maturation function. Median Bu area under the curve (AUC) was 1179 µmol/L × min compared to 1025 with the EMA dosing nomogram for children <9 kg. The target AUC was reached for each BW strata, significantly increasing the percentages of patients achieving reaching the targeted AUC as compared to FDA schedule.

CONCLUSION

This new model made it possible to propose a novel dosing nomogram that better considered children below 16 kg of BW and allowed better initial exposure as compared to existing dosing schedules. This nomogram, which would be easy to use to determine an optimal dosing schedule in daily practice, will need to be validated in clinical routine. Therapeutic drug monitoring remains strongly advisable for small children and those with specific diseases.

Intravenous busulfan and melphalan versus high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for early autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a propensity score-matched analysis

We compared the efficacy and toxicity of busulfan and melphalan (BUMEL) and those of high-dose melphalan (HDMEL) as conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) through a propensity score-matched analysis. No significant difference in the complete response and overall response rate after ASCT was observed between BUMEL and HDMEL. After a median follow-up of 37.3 months in the BUMEL group and 50.8 months in the HDMEL group, the median progression-free survival was calculated to be 32.9 months and 25.2 months (p = 0.995). With respect to non-hematologic toxicities, infections were more frequently reported in the BUMEL group (p < 0.001). Three patients who received BUMEL developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), and all of them recovered without administration of defibrotide. In conclusion, BUMEL is an effective alternative conditioning regimen in terms of efficacy, but attention should be paid to toxicities.

Busulfan clearance does not predict the development of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a life-threatening complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Busulfan has a narrow therapeutic index and its concentration was found to correlate with VOD. Our primary objective was to assess the association between busulfan clearance and VOD in HSCT patients. In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who received their HSCT between 2003 and 2014 and followed at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. All patients who received dose-targeted busulfan-containing conditioning were included. Target steady-state concentration (Css) was 800-900 ng/ml. VOD was assessed using modified Seattle criteria. The impact of busulfan clearance on VOD was analyzed using univariable logistic regression model. Seventy-three patients were included with a mean age of 15 years. Of those, 47% were transplanted for hematological malignancies and 53% for inherited hemoglobinopathies. Target Css was achieved in 85% of patients. The rate of VOD was 17%. There was no significant impact of busulfan clearance (p = 0.919) or area-under-the-concentration-time-curve (p = 0.275) on VOD. Targeting busulfan Css into narrow therapeutic range may have accounted for the findings. The risk of VOD might be related to other factors such as the genetic background, and more studies are required to investigate these factors.

Raman spectroscopy as a potential tool for label free therapeutic drug monitoring in human serum: the case of busulfan and methotrexate

A methodology is proposed, based on Raman spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis, to determine the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for therapeutic drug monitoring in human serum, using the examples of Busulfan and Methotrexate.