Sleep disordered breathing in heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction

Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: who and why to test and how to intervene?

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly those with heart failure (HF). There are two main types of SDB, central sleep apnoea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) which frequently overlap as mixed SDB. Investigating for SDB could be considered in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, male sex, high body mass index, low ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with no dipping blood pressure pattern, recurrent paroxysms of nocturnal dyspnoea or when an apnoea is witnessed. Excessive daytime sleepiness is less likely to be reported by patients with HF than by the general population. In patients with CVD and OSA, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation for over 4 hours daily reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but there was no reduction in mortality. In patients with AF and OSA treated with AF ablation, CPAP use was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of AF. In patients with HF and OSA, small studies have demonstrated that CPAP improves symptoms, brain natriuretic peptide levels and ejection fraction, but data on survival are lacking. Treatment remains unclear in patients with HF and CSA. The presence of CSA may be a defensive adaptive response to HF, and effectively treating CSA as demonstrated in a randomised clinical trial of adaptive servo-ventilation caused more harm than benefit when compared to optimal medical therapy. Thus, the focus of treating CSA should remain on improving the underlying HF by optimising medical therapy and, if indicated, cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

The causality between obstructive sleep apnea and ventricular structure and function: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Background: Multiple observational studies have discovered a substantial link between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and ventricular dysfunction. However, conventional observational studies are vulnerable to causal reversal and confounding, making it challenging to infer the causes of effects and their direction. Methods: With the help of a bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study, we assessed the potential causality between OSA and left and right ventricular (LV, RV) structure and function. We conducted our analysis utilizing summary data from genome-wide association studies of OSA (16,761 cases and 201,194 controls) in the FinnGen Study, as well as LV (36,041 participants) and RV (29,506 participants) in the UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance research. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) was selected as the main strategy, with the MR-Egger and weighted median methods serving as supplements. Other methods were employed as sensitivity analysis tools to look at heterogeneity and pleiotropy, including MR-Egger intercept, Cochran Q statistic, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out analysis. Results: In the primary IVW analysis, genetically predicted OSA was strongly causative on LV end-diastolic volume (β = 0.114, 95% CI = 0.034-0.194, p = 0.006) and LV stroke volume (β = 0.111, 95% CI = 0.031-0.191, p = 0.007), and genetically predicted LV ejection fraction was linked to an increased risk of OSA (OR = 1.161, 95% CI = 1.029-1.309, p = 0.015). However, there was no connection found between OSA and any RV parameters. Conclusion: Our genetic analysis raises a potential causative link between OSA and ventricular structure and function, which may improve the knowledge of OSA as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease by demonstrating a direct impact on cardiac structure and function.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with heart failure of different left ventricular ejection fractions

PURPOSES

The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is high in patients with heart failure (HF), while the prevalence of SDB in HF with different left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) has rarely been reported. We aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical characteristics of SDB in patients with HF having different LVEF.

METHODS

Patients with stable HF were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent portable overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy and echocardiography. According to their LVEF, the patients were divided into the HFrEF (HF with reduced EF, EF < 40%), HFmrEF (HF with mid-range EF, 40 ≤ EF < 50), and HFpEF groups (HF with preserved EF, EF ≥ 50%). The prevalence and clinical data of SDB among the 3 groups were then compared.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients, including 134 men, were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of SDB in patients with HF was 70%. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was diagnosed in 48% and central sleep apnea (CSA) in 22%. The prevalence of SDB in the HFrEE, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups was 86%, 86%, and 62%, respectively (P = 0.001). The prevalence of OSA among the 3 groups was 42%, 47%, and 49%, respectively (P = 0.708), while the prevalence of CSA among the 3 groups was 44%, 40%, and 13% (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age and BMI were independent risk factors for OSA in patients with HF, while LVEF and smoking were independent risk factors for CSA in patients with HF. Correlational analyses revealed that LVEF was negatively correlated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (r = -0.309, P < 0.001) and central apnea index (CAI) ( r = -0.558, P < 0.001), while there was no significant correlation with obstructive apnea index (OAI). The ROC curve revealed that LVEF could predict the occurrence of CSA and SDB, with AUC = 0.683 (95%CI 0.600-0.767, P < 0.001) and AUC = 0.630 (95%CI 0.559-0.702, P = 0.001), but not of OSA.

CONCLUSIONS

SDB was highly common in HF, and the prevalence of SDB was different in HF with different LVEF, mainly due to the difference in cardiac functions. The prevalence and severity of SDB in HFrEF and HFmrEF were significantly higher than those in HFpEF, which was mainly related to the increase in CSA. When HFmrEF was similar to HFrEF in cardiac functions, the prevalence, type, and severity of SDB were similar between the two groups. Changes in LVEF had a significant impact on CAI, but not on OAI. LVEF can predict the occurrence of CSA and SDB to a certain extent.

The mobile sleep medicine model in neurologic practice: Rationale and application

Background

Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in neurological practice and significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. OSA is prevalent in US adults and causes poor quality sleep and significant neurocognitive, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular impairments. Timely treatment of OSA reduces cardio-cerebrovascular risks and improves quality of life. However, most of the US population has limited systematic access to sleep medicine care despite its clinical significance.

Focus

We discuss the importance of systematic screening, testing, and best-practice management of OSA and hypoventilation/hypoxemia syndromes (HHS) in patients with stroke, neurocognitive impairment, and neuromuscular conditions. This review aims to introduce and describe a novel integrated Mobile Sleep Medicine (iMSM) care model and provide the rationale for using an iMSM in general neurological practice to assist with systematic screening, testing and best-practice management of OSA, HHS, and potentially other sleep conditions.

Key points

The iMSM is an innovative, patient-centered, clinical outcome-based program that uses a Mobile Sleep Medicine Unit—a “sleep lab on wheels”—designed to improve access to OSA management and sleep care at all levels of health care system. The protocol for the iMSM care model includes three levels of operations to provide effective and efficient OSA screening, timely testing/treatment plans, and coordination of further sleep medicine care follow-up. The iMSM care model prioritizes effective, efficient, and patient-centered sleep medicine care; therefore, all parties and segments of care that receive and provide clinical sleep medicine services may benefit from adopting this innovative approach.

Prevalence and predictors of sleep-disordered breathing in chronic heart failure: the SchlaHF-XT registry

AIMS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition with increasing prevalence. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is an important co-morbidity in HFpEF. The SchlaHF-XT registry evaluated the sex-specific prevalence and predictors of SDB, including obstructive (OSA) and central sleep apnoea, in patients with HFpEF compared with heart failure with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive adults with chronic heart failure treated according to current guidelines were enrolled. The presence of moderate-to-severe SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥15/h) was determined using Type 3 polygraphic devices. Of 3289 patients included, 2032 had HFpEF, 559 had HFmrEF, and 698 had HFrEF, of whom 34, 21, 23, and 42%, respectively, were female. Prevalence of SDB in HFpEF was high, but significantly lower than in HFmrEF or HFrEF (36% vs. 41 and 48%, respectively). Rates of SDB in males and females were 41 and 28% in HFpEF, 44 and 30% in HFmrEF, and 50 and 40% in HFrEF. The proportion of males and females with SDB who had OSA was significantly greater in those with HFpEF vs. HFrEF. Male sex, older age, higher body mass index, and New York Heart Association functional Class III/IV were significant predictors of moderate-to-severe SDB in HFpEF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of SDB in HFpEF was high, but lower than in patients with HFmrEF or HFrEF. Moderate-to-severe SDB occurred more frequently in males than in females across the whole spectrum of heart failure. In both sexes, the proportion of OSA in SDB patients with HFpEF was higher than in those with HFrEF.

Effects of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Using MitraClip® Device on Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Mitral Valve Regurgitation

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common among patients with valvular heart disease, and successful valve surgery could reduce SDB severity. However, data about the effects of transcatheter mitral valve repair on SDB are scarce. Therefore, mitral regurgitation (MR) patients undergoing MitraClip-placement were prospectively enrolled. Before MitraClip-placement, daytime sleepiness and sleep quality were assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively; and all patients underwent SDB screening using five-channel respiratory polygraphy. After 3-6 months, patients had a similar reassessment including: ESS, PSQI, and respiratory polygraphy. 67 patients were included (77 ± 8years). Despite normal sleepiness scores, 41 patients (61%) had SDB with apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI) ≥ 15 h before MitraClip-placement, of whom only three patients had known SDB previously. Compared to patients without SDB, patients with SDB had similar sleepiness scores but higher NT-proBNP values at baseline (4325 vs. 1520 pg/mL, p < 0.001). At follow-up, there were significant AHI improvements among patients with SDB (p = 0.013). However, there were no significant sleepiness score changes. In conclusion, the prevalence of SDB among MitraClip candidates is very high even in those without daytime sleepiness. MR patients with SDB have higher NT-proBNP values, which may reflect a worse prognosis. MitraClip-placement may improve the underlying SDB, which could be an additional benefit of the procedure.

Novel technologies in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a promise during the time of disappointment from pharmacological approaches?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite numerous attempts, none of a wide variety of tested drugs achieved meaningful improvement in the outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), making new therapeutic strategies a major unmet medical need. The medical device industry embraced the challenge, developing novel technologies directed to face specific aspects of the pathophysiology of HFpEF. This review focuses on some of the most promising technologies attaining meaningful clinical progress recently in the field of HFpEF therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implantable pulmonary artery pressure, monitoring for optimization of medical therapy, proved to be beneficial in heart failure admissions in a large postmarketing clinical study. Investigational devices, such as inter-atrial shunts and transvenous phrenic nerve stimulators for the treatment of central sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes breathing, are currently being evaluated in HFpEF cohorts in recent trials.

SUMMARY

Device-based therapies for HFpEF demonstrated encouraging safety and efficacy results in various stages of the disease. Further efforts are needed to ensure that these devices will reach clinical use and contribute to the management of HFpEF patients.

Association between sleep disordered breathing, neurocognitive impairment and diastolic function in acute heart failure patients: an insight after the vulnerable phase of the hospitalization

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and neurocognitive impairment (NI) are a typical feature of HF (heart failure), especially with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). So far, very few data exist regarding changes in the severity of SDB, the degree of NI, and the diastolic function in acute HF (AHF) patients and during follow up. In a population of 24 AHF patients (12 with reduced ejection fraction-HFrEF- and 12 HFpEF) with SDB a complete echocardiogram, a set of NI tests, and a polysomnography were performed in the acute phase and after 90 days. A control group of 12 non-HF patients hospitalized for other cardiovascular causes was considered. At baseline, SDB were present both in HFpEF and HFrEF, and a consistent reduction of apneic events was observed at follow up. Improvements in diastolic and right ventricular function were documented at three months compared to baseline, both in HFpEF and in HFrEF. Compared to HFrEF patients and controls, HFpEF patients showed lower NI scores at baseline tests, but a more significant improvement at three months follow-up. In AHF patients with SDB the achievement of a better compensation could lead to important beneficial effect not only on echocardiographic variables and nocturnal respiratory profile, but also on NI, especially in HFpEF.

Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders: When CPAP Is Not Enough

Three decades ago, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was introduced to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Shortly after, bilevel positive airway pressure devices (BPAP) that independently adjusted inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressure were developed to treat complex sleep-related breathing disorders unresponsive to CPAP. Based on the bilevel positive airway pressure platform (hardware) governed by propriety algorithms (software), advanced modes of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) were developed to address complex cardiorespiratory pathophysiology beyond OSA. This review summarizes key aspects of different bilevel PAP therapies (BPAP with/without backup rate, adaptive servoventilation, and volume-assured pressure support) to treat common sleep-related hypoventilation disorders, treatment-emergent central sleep apnea, and central sleep apnea syndromes.

Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction Among Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Background

Sleep apnea (SA) is common and has prognostic significance among broad groups of patients with heart failure (HF). There are no data characterizing the presence, associations, and prognostic significance of SA among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) with HF.

Methods

We conducted a single-center study of PLHIV with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) and analyzed the relationship of SA with 30-day HF hospital readmission rate.

Results

Our cohort included 1124 individuals admitted with HFrEF; 15% were PLHIV, and 92% were on antiretroviral therapy. SA was noted in 28% of PLHIV and 26% of uninfected controls. Compared to uninfected controls with HFrEF and SA, PLHIV with HFrEF and SA had a lower body mass index, lower LVEF, a higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), were more likely to have obstructive rather than central SA (P < .05 for all). In a multivariable model, PASP, low CD4 count, high viral load (VL), and SA parameters (apnea-hypopnea index, CPAP use and duration) were predictors of 30-day HF readmission rate. Each 1-hour increase in CPAP use was associated with a 14% decreased risk of 30-day HF readmission among PLHIV.

Conclusions

Compared to uninfected controls, PLHIV were more likely to have obstructive SA than central SA. Apnea severity, low CD4 count, high VL, and cocaine use were positively associated with 30-day HF hospital readmission rate, whereas CPAP use and increased duration of CPAP use conferred protection.

Central and Obstructive Apneas in Heart Failure With Reduced, Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Although central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF), a comparison of apnea prevalence, predictors and clinical correlates in the whole HF spectrum, including HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mid-range EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (HFpEF) has never been carried out so far.

Materials and methods: 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring.

Results: In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40, 51, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15, 55, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased (daytime: 57 vs. 43 vs. 42%, p = 0.001; nighttime: 66 vs. 48 vs. 34%, p < 0.0001) from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF, while OA prevalence increased (daytime: 5 vs. 8 vs. 18%, p < 0.0001; nighttime 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, p < 0.0001).

In HFrEF, male gender and body mass index (BMI) were independent predictors of both CA and OA at nighttime, while age, New York Heart Association functional class and diastolic dysfunction of daytime CA. In HFmrEF and HFpEF male gender and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were independent predictors of CA at daytime, while hypertension predicted nighttime OA in HFpEF patients; no predictor of nighttime CA was identified. When compared to patients with NB, those with CA had higher neuro-hormonal activation in all HF subgroups. Moreover, in the HFrEF subgroup, patients with CA were older, more comorbid and with greater hemodynamic impairment while, in the HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups, they had higher left atrial volumes and more severe diastolic dysfunction, respectively. When compared to patients with NB, those with OA were older and more comorbid independently from background EF.

Conclusions: Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses. Different predictors and specific clinical characteristics might help to identify patients at risk of developing CA or OA in different HF phenotypes.

The epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnoea and cardiovascular disease

Obstructive sleep apnoea, the most common form of sleep-disordered breathing, is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease. The last 30 years has seen a plethora of large scale epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between sleep apnoea and cardiovascular outcomes. This review highlights the key epidemiological studies addressing the links between sleep apnoea and hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure and pulmonary hypertension, with a particular focus on some of the most recent reports.

Management of Sleep Apnea in Heart Failure

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in heart failure (HF). The presence of SDB in patients with HF appears to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this article, we describe the types, pathophysiology, and consequences of SDB and discuss ways in which SDB can be diagnosed. We also lay emphasis on the recent randomized controlled trials that have had a major impact on how SDB is managed and highlight the complex relationship between SDB and outcomes.

Epidemiology of Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Heart Failure: What Drives What

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The bidirectional relationships that have been demonstrated between heart failure (HF) and central sleep apnea (CSA) demand further exploration with respect to the implications that each condition has for the other. This review discusses the body of literature that has accumulated on these relationships and how CSA and its potential treatment may affect outcomes in patients with CSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can exacerbate hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and atherosclerosis, which are known predicates of HF. Conversely, patients with HF more frequently exhibit OSA partly due to respiratory control system instability. These same mechanisms are responsible for the frequent association of HF with CSA with or without a Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing (HCSB) pattern. Just as is the case with OSA, patients with HF complicated by CSA exhibit more severe cardiac dysfunction leading to increased mortality; the increase in severity of HF can in turn worsen the degree of sleep disordered breathing (SDB). Thus, a bidirectional relationship exists between HF and both phenotypes of SDB; moreover, an individual patient may exhibit a combination of these phenotypes. Both types of SDB remain significantly underdiagnosed in patients with HF and hence undertreated. Appropriate screening for, and treatment of, OSA is clearly a significant factor in the comprehensive management of HF, while the relevance of CSA remains controversial. Given the unexpected results of the Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure trial, it is now of paramount importance that additional analysis of these data be expeditiously reported. It is also critical that ongoing and proposed prospective studies of this issue proceed without delay.

Sleep-Disordered Breathing-Do We Have to Change Gears in Heart Failure?

The majority of patients with heart failure have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB)—with central (rather than obstructive) sleep apnoea becoming the predominant form in those with more severe disease. Cyclical apnoeas and hypopnoeas are associated with sleep disturbance, hypoxaemia, haemodynamic changes, and sympathetic activation. Such patients have a worse prognosis than those without SDB. Mask-based therapies of positive airway pressure targeted at SDB can improve measures of sleep quality and partially normalise the sleep and respiratory physiology, but recent randomised trials of cardiovascular outcomes in central sleep apnoea have been neutral or suggested the possibility of harm, likely from increased sudden death. Further randomised outcome studies (with cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation endpoints) are required to determine whether mask-based treatment for SDB is appropriate for patients with chronic systolic heart failure and obstructive sleep apnoea, for those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and for those with decompensated heart failure. New therapies for sleep apnoea—such as implantable phrenic nerve stimulators—also require robust assessment. No longer can the surrogate endpoints of improvement in respiratory and sleep metrics be taken as adequate therapeutic outcome measures in patients with heart failure and sleep apnoea.

Current Perspectives on Systemic Hypertension in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent but incompletely understood syndrome. Traditional models of HFpEF pathophysiology revolve around systemic HTN and other causes of increased left ventricular afterload leading to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction. However, emerging models attribute the development of HFpEF to systemic proinflammatory changes secondary to common comorbidities which include HTN. Alterations in passive ventricular stiffness, ventricular-arterial coupling, peripheral microvascular function, systolic reserve, and chronotropic response occur. As a result, HFpEF is heterogeneous in nature, making it difficult to prescribe uniform therapies to all patients. Nonetheless, treating systemic HTN remains a cornerstone of HFpEF management. Antihypertensive therapies have been linked to LVH regression and improvement in diastolic dysfunction. However, to date, no therapies have definitive mortality benefit in HFpEF. Non-pharmacologic management for HTN, including dietary modification, exercise, and treating sleep disordered breathing, may provide some morbidity benefit in the HFpEF population. Future research is need to identify effective treatments, perhaps in more specific subgroups, and focus may need to shift from reducing mortality to improving exercise capacity and symptoms. Tailoring antihypertensive therapies to specific phenotypes of HFpEF may be an important component of this strategy.

Sleep apnea: State of the art

Many patient with, or at risk of, cardiovascular disease have sleep disordered breathing (SDB), which can be either obstructive (with intermittent collapse of the upper airway) or central (episodic loss of respiratory drive). SDB is associated with sleep disturbance, hypoxemia, hemodynamic changes, and sympathetic activation. Such patients have a worse prognosis than those without SDB. Mask-based therapies of positive airway pressure targeted at SDB can improve measures of sleep quality and partially normalize the sleep and respiratory physiology, but recent randomized trials of cardiovascular outcomes in SDB have either been neutral (obstructive sleep apnea) or suggested the possibility of harm, likely from increased sudden death, in central sleep apnea. Alternative methods for the treatment of SDB are being explored, including implantable technologies, but these have not been studied in adequately powered randomized controlled studies. International guidelines recommend screening for SDB, which can be done easily in clinical practice, as there may be a role for the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness, or resistant hypertension, or atrial fibrillation. Further randomised outcome studies are required to determine whether mask-based treatment for SDB is appropriate for patients with chronic systolic heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea; for those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; and for those with decompensated heart failure. The case is made that no longer can the surrogate endpoints of improvement in respiratory and sleep metrics be taken as adequate therapeutic outcome measures in patients with sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease.

Definition, discrimination, diagnosis and treatment of central breathing disturbances during sleep

The complexity of central breathing disturbances during sleep has become increasingly obvious. They present as central sleep apnoeas (CSAs) and hypopnoeas, periodic breathing with apnoeas, or irregular breathing in patients with cardiovascular, other internal or neurological disorders, and can emerge under positive airway pressure treatment or opioid use, or at high altitude. As yet, there is insufficient knowledge on the clinical features, pathophysiological background and consecutive algorithms for stepped-care treatment. Most recently, it has been discussed intensively if CSA in heart failure is a “marker” of disease severity or a “mediator” of disease progression, and if and which type of positive airway pressure therapy is indicated. In addition, disturbances of respiratory drive or the translation of central impulses may result in hypoventilation, associated with cerebral or neuromuscular diseases, or severe diseases of lung or thorax. These statements report the results of an European Respiratory Society Task Force addressing actual diagnostic and therapeutic standards. The statements are based on a systematic review of the literature and a systematic two-step decision process. Although the Task Force does not make recommendations, it describes its current practice of treatment of CSA in heart failure and hypoventilation.

Relationship between central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes Respiration

Central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure (HF) occurs frequently and shows a serious influence on prognosis in this population. The key elements in the pathophysiology of CSA are respiratory instability with chronic hyperventilation, changes of arterial carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2) and elongated circulation time. The main manifestation of CSA in patients with HF is Cheyne-Stokes Respiration (CSR). The initial treatment is the optimization of HF therapy. However, many other options of the therapeutic management have been studied, particularly those based on positive airway pressure methods. In patients with heart failure we often can observe the overlap of CSA and CSR; we will discuss the differences between these forms of breathing disorders during sleep. We will also discuss when CSA and CSR occur independently of each other and the importance of CSR occurring during the daytime in context of CSA during the nighttime.

Heart Failure and Sleep Apnea

Obstructive and central sleep apnea are far more common in heart failure patients than in the general population and their presence might contribute to the progression of heart failure by exposing the heart to intermittent hypoxia, increased preload and afterload, sympathetic nervous system activation, and vascular endothelial dysfunction. There is now substantial evidence that supports a role for fluid overload and nocturnal rostral fluid shift from the legs as unifying mechanisms in the pathogenesis of obstructive and central sleep apnea in heart failure patients, such that the predominant type of sleep apnea is related to the relative distribution of fluid from the leg to the neck and chest. Despite advances in therapies for heart failure, mortality rates remain high. Accordingly, the identification and treatment of sleep apnea in patients with heart failure might offer a novel therapeutic target to modulate this increased risk. In heart failure patients with obstructive or central sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure has been shown to improve cardiovascular function in short-term trials but this has not translated to improved mortality or reduced hospital admissions in long-term randomized trials. Other forms of positive airway pressure such as adaptive servoventilation have shown promising results in terms of attenuation of sleep apnea and improvement in cardiovascular function in short-term trials. Large scale, randomized trials are required to determine whether treating sleep apnea with various interventions can reduce morbidity and mortality.

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Heart Failure - Current State of the Art

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), either obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) or central sleep apnoea (CSA)/Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) and often a combination of the two, is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), is associated with reduced functional capacity and quality of life, and has a negative prognostic impact. European HF guidelines identify that sleep apnoea is of concern in patients with HF. Continuous positive airway pressure is the treatment of choice for OSA, and adaptive servoventilation (ASV) appears to be the most consistently effective therapy for CSA/CSR while also being able to treat concomitant obstructive events. There is a growing body of evidence that treating SDB in patients with HF, particularly using ASV for CSA/CSR, improves functional outcomes such as HF symptoms, cardiac function, cardiac disease markers, exercise tolerance and quality of life. However, conflicting results have been reported on 'hard' outcomes such as mortality and healthcare utilisation, and the influence of effectively treating SDB, including CSA/CSR, remains to be determined in randomised clinical trials. Two such trials (SERVE-HF and ADVENT-HF) in chronic stable HF and another in post-acute decompensated HF (CAT-HF) are currently underway.

Noncardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure patients are classified by ejection fraction (EF) into distinct groups: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Although patients with heart failure commonly have multiple comorbidities that complicate management and may adversely affect outcomes, their role in the HFpEF and HFrEF groups is not well-characterized. This review summarizes the role of noncardiac comorbidities in patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF, emphasizing prevalence, underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and outcomes. Pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, anemia, and obesity tend to be more prevalent in HFpEF patients, but renal disease and sleep-disordered breathing burdens are similar. These comorbidities similarly increase morbidity and mortality risk in HFpEF and HFrEF patients. Common pathophysiologic mechanisms include systemic and endomyocardial inflammation with fibrosis. We also discuss implications for clinical care and future HF clinical trial design. The basis for this review was discussions between scientists, clinical trialists, and regulatory representatives at the 10th Global CardioVascular Clinical Trialists Forum.