1
|
Alabdaljabar MS, Elhadi M, Geske JB, Klarich KW, Guerrero M, Eleid MF. Sex-Related Differences in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Alcohol Septal Ablation. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032553. [PMID: 38700034 PMCID: PMC11179887 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that women with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HCM) have worse long-term outcomes irrespective of intervention. However, the outcomes of patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation (ASA) based on sex have not been described. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate pressure changes and long-term mortality in patients with HCM undergoing ASA based on sex. METHODS AND RESULTS This is a single-center retrospective study evaluating hemodynamic changes and long-term mortality in patients with HCM treated with ASA according to sex. A total of 259 patients were included (aged 68.4±11.9 years, 62.2% women). Women had higher age and baseline pressures at the time of ASA, with a greater percent reduction in mean left atrial pressure (men versus women: 2.2% versus 15.9%, respectively; P=0.02). Women had better survival (median survival rate of men versus women: 8.6 versus 12.5 years, respectively; P=0.011). On Cox multivariable regression, predictors of mortality were age (per group change <60 years, 61-70 years, 71-80 years, and >80 years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.10-1.91], P=0.008), female sex (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.99], P=0.048), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.06-3.33], P=0.031), and left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction ≤86% (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.14-3.19], P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS Women with HCM undergoing ASA are older and have higher left-sided baseline pressures compared with men yet have better survival. Further studies exploring the mechanisms of differential outcomes according to sex in patients with HCM undergoing ASA are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Elhadi
- Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Jeffrey B Geske
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Kyle W Klarich
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Mayra Guerrero
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Mackram F Eleid
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kotidis C, Nirmal N, Kantzis M. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in children and adults with an age and gender-specific analysis. Cardiol Young 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38185984 DOI: 10.1017/s1047951123004328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited studies with medium-term follow-up following percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation and no studies with a gender-specific analysis. AIMS To report clinical outcomes up to five years following percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using the two most common balloon expandable valves in a mixed population of paediatric and adult patients with an age and gender-specific analysis. METHODS This was a single-centre retrospective observation study. Relevant data were obtained retrospectively from the case files. Age and gender- specific analysis was performed using SPSS. RESULTS Totally, 58 patients (13 children, 45 adults) underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Statistically significant reduction in median right ventricular outflow tract flow velocity following valve implantation was maintained for the whole five years in adults but not in children. There were no gender-specific differences despite the study being adequately powered. Independent of valve type used, there was significant reduction of the right ventricular outflow tract flow velocity in the immediate post valve implantation period (Edwards P = 0.001, Melody P = 0.013). There was a significant negative correlation between implanted valve Z-score and subsequent right ventricular outflow tract gradient during the first two years following valve implantation. CONCLUSION Gender does not significantly affect valve function following percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. It is important to consider patients' age and body surface area in relation to existing right ventricular outflow tract size during decisions for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neeraj Nirmal
- East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Marinos Kantzis
- East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diegoli H, Alves MRD, Okumura LM, Kroll C, Silveira D, Furlan LHP. Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with Different Populations. Arq Bras Cardiol 2023; 120:e20220701. [PMID: 37466620 PMCID: PMC10365004 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have compared the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVES Compare TAVR and SAVR in patients with different surgical risks, population characteristics, and different transcatheter prosthetic valves. METHODS An overview of systematic reviews (SRs) was conducted following a structured protocol. Results were grouped by surgical risk, population characteristics, and different valves. RCTs in the SRs were reanalyzed through meta-analyses, and the results were summarized using the GRADE method. The adopted level of statistical significance was 5%. RESULTS Compared to SAVR, patients with high surgical risk using TAVR had a lower risk of (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, absolute risk difference) atrial fibrillation (AF) (0.5, 0.29-0.86, -106/1000) and life-threatening bleeding (0.29, 0.2-0.42, -215/1000). Patients with intermediate surgical risk had a lower risk of AF (0.27, 0.23-0.33, -255/1000), life-threatening bleeding (0.15, 0.12-0.19, -330/1000), and acute renal failure (ARF) (0.4, 0.26-0.62, -21/1000). Patients with low surgical risk had a lower risk of death (0.58, 0.34-0.97, -16/1000), stroke (0.51, 0.28-0.94, -15/1000), AF (0.16, 0.12-0.2, -295/1000), life-threatening bleeding (0.17, 0.05-0.55, -76/1000), and ARF (0.27, 0.13-0.55, -21/1000), and had a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (4.22, 1.27-14.02, 141/1000). Newer generation devices had a lower risk of AF than older generations, and patients using balloon-expandable devices did not experience higher risks of PPI. CONCLUSIONS This paper provides evidence that patients at low, intermediate, and high surgical risks have better outcomes when treated with TAVR compared with SAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique Diegoli
- Academia VBHC Educação e Consultoria LtdaSão PauloSPBrasil Academia VBHC Educação e Consultoria Ltda , São Paulo , SP – Brasil
| | - Marcia Regina Dias Alves
- Edwards Lifesciences CorporationSão PauloSPBrasil Edwards Lifesciences Corporation , São Paulo , SP – Brasil
| | | | - Caroline Kroll
- Universidade da Região de JoinvilleJoinvilleSCBrasil Universidade da Região de Joinville , Joinville , SC – Brasil
| | - Dayane Silveira
- Edwards Lifesciences CorporationSão PauloSPBrasil Edwards Lifesciences Corporation , São Paulo , SP – Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russo G, Tang GHL, Sangiorgi G, Pedicino D, Enriquez-Sarano M, Maisano F, Taramasso M. Lifetime Management of Aortic Stenosis: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Treatment for Young and Low-Risk Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:915-927. [PMID: 36378737 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is now indicated across all risk categories of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and has been proposed as first line option for the majority of patients >74 years old. However, median age of patients enrolled in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement low-risk trials is 74 years and transcatheter aortic valve replacement has never been systematically investigated in young low risk patients. Although the long-term data in surgical aortic valve replacement in young patients (age <75) are well known, such data remain lacking in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In the absence of clear guideline recommendations in patients with challenging anatomies (eg, hostile calcium, bicuspid), it is important to know the potential advantages and disadvantages of each treatment and to consider how they might integrate with each other in the lifetime management of such patients. In this review, we discuss current outstanding issues on the management of severe aortic stenosis from a lifetime management perspective, particularly in terms of initial intervention and future reinterventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Russo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome (G.R., G.S.)
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York (G.H.L.T.)
| | - Giuseppe Sangiorgi
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome (G.R., G.S.)
| | - Daniela Pedicino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCSS, Roma, Italia (D.P.).,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia (D.P.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Swift SL, Puehler T, Misso K, Lang SH, Forbes C, Kleijnen J, Danner M, Kuhn C, Haneya A, Seoudy H, Cremer J, Frey N, Lutter G, Wolff R, Scheibler F, Wehkamp K, Frank D. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054222. [PMID: 34873012 PMCID: PMC8650468 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients undergoing surgery for severe aortic stenosis (SAS) can be treated with either transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The choice of procedure depends on several factors, including the clinical judgement of the heart team and patient preferences, which are captured by actively informing and involving patients in a process of shared decision making (SDM). We synthesised the most up-to-date and accessible evidence on the benefits and risks that may be associated with TAVI versus SAVR to support SDM in this highly personalised decision-making process. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Wiley) were searched from January 2000 to August 2020 with no language restrictions. Reference lists of included studies were searched to identify additional studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared TAVI versus SAVR in patients with SAS and reported on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit or hospital, valve durability, rehospitalisation/reintervention, stroke (any stroke or major/disabling stroke), myocardial infarction, major vascular complications, major bleeding, permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, new-onset or worsening atrial fibrillation (NOW-AF), endocarditis, acute kidney injury (AKI), recovery time or pain were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers were involved in data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessment using the Cochrane tool (one reviewer extracted/assessed the data, and the second reviewer checked it). Dichotomous data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects to generate a risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Continuous data were pooled using the inverse-variance method with random-effects and expressed as a mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS 8969 records were retrieved and nine RCTs (61 records) were ultimately included (n=8818 participants). Two RCTs recruited high-risk patients, two RCTs recruited intermediate-risk patients, two RCTs recruited low-risk patients, one RCT recruited high-risk (≥70 years) or any-risk (≥80 years) patients; and two RCTs recruited all-risk or 'operable' patients. While there was no overall change in the risk of dying from any cause (30 day: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.22; ≤1 year: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.03; 5 years: RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.22), cardiovascular mortality (30 day: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.39; ≤1 year: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.06; 2 years: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.12), or any type of stroke (30 day: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.14;≤1 year: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.23; 5 years: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.30), the risk of several clinical outcomes was significantly decreased (major bleeding, AKI, NOW-AF) or significantly increased (major vascular complications, PPM implantation) for TAVI vs SAVR. TAVI was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay vs SAVR (MD -3.08 days, 95% CI -4.86 to -1.29; 4 RCTs, n=2758 participants). Subgroup analysis generally favoured TAVI patients receiving implantation via the transfemoral (TF) route (vs non-TF); receiving a balloon-expandable (vs self-expanding) valve; and those at low-intermediate risk (vs high risk). All RCTs were rated at high ROB, predominantly due to lack of blinding and selective reporting. CONCLUSIONS No overall change in the risk of death from any cause or cardiovascular mortality was identified but 95% CIs were often wide, indicating uncertainty. TAVI may reduce the risk of certain side effects while SAVR may reduce the risk of others. Most long-term (5-year) results are limited to older patients at high surgical risk (ie, early trials), therefore more data are required for low risk populations. Ultimately, neither surgical technique was considered dominant, and these results suggest that every patient with SAS should be individually engaged in SDM to make evidence-based, personalised decisions around their care based on the various benefits and risks associated with each treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019138171.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Puehler
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kate Misso
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Marion Danner
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christian Kuhn
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Assad Haneya
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hatim Seoudy
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jochen Cremer
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Lutter
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Fueloep Scheibler
- National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kai Wehkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Derk Frank
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gender Differences after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Insights from the Italian Clinical Service Project. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2021; 8:jcdd8090114. [PMID: 34564131 PMCID: PMC8472227 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd8090114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: TAVR is a safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR); however, sex-related differences are still debated. This research aimed to examine gender differences in a real-world transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) cohort. Methods: All-comer aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing TAVR with a Medtronic valve across 19 Italian sites were prospectively included in the Italian Clinical Service Project (NCT01007474) between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 1-year mortality. We also investigated 3-year mortality, and ischemic and hemorrhagic endpoints, and we performed a propensity score matching to assemble patients with similar baseline characteristics. Results: Out of 3821 patients, 2149 (56.2%) women were enrolled. Compared with men, women were older (83 ± 6 vs. 81 ± 6 years, p < 0.001), more likely to present severe renal impairment (GFR ≤ 30 mL/min, 26.3% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001) but had less previous cardiovascular events (all p < 0.001), with a higher mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (7.8% ± 7.1% vs. 7.2 ± 7.5, p < 0.001) and a greater mean aortic gradient (52.4 ± 15.3 vs. 47.3 ± 12.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). Transfemoral TAVR was performed more frequently in women (87.2% vs. 82.1%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of major vascular complications and life-threatening bleeding (3.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.012 and 2.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.024). One-year mortality differed between female and male (11.5% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.002), and this difference persisted after adjustment for significant confounding variables (Adj.HR1yr 1.47, 95%IC 1.18–1.82, p < 0.001). Three-year mortality was also significantly lower in women compared with men (19.8% vs. 24.9%, p < 0.001) even after adjustment for age, STS score, eGFR, diabetes and severe COPD (Adj.HR3yr 1.42, 95%IC 1.21–1.68, p < 0.001). These results were confirmed in 689 pairs after propensity score matching. Conclusion: Despite higher rates of peri-procedural complications, women presented better survival than men. This better adaptive response to TAVR may be driven by sex-specific factors.
Collapse
|
7
|
One-Year Outcomes after Surgical versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Newer Generation Devices. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163703. [PMID: 34441998 PMCID: PMC8396948 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The superiority of transcatheter (TAVR) over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) has not been fully demonstrated in a real-world setting. This prospective study included 5706 AS patients who underwent SAVR from 2010 to 2012 and 2989 AS patients who underwent TAVR from 2017 to 2018 from the prospective multicenter observational studies OBSERVANT I and II. Early adverse events as well as all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and hospital readmission due to heart failure at 1-year were investigated. Among 1008 propensity score matched pairs, TAVR was associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality (1.8 vs. 3.5%, p = 0.020), stroke (0.8 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.005), and acute kidney injury (0.6 vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001) compared to SAVR. Moderate-to-severe paravalvular regurgitation (5.9 vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (13.8 vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) were more frequent after TAVR. At 1-year, TAVR was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (7.9 vs. 11.5%, p = 0.006), MACCE (12.0 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.011), readmission due to heart failure (10.8 vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001), and stroke (3.2 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.033) compared to SAVR. TAVR reduced 1-year mortality in the subgroups of patients aged 80 years or older (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33–0.71), in females (HR 0.57, 0.38–0.85), and among patients with EuroSCORE II ≥ 4.0% (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32–0.71). In a real-world setting, TAVR using new-generation devices was associated with lower rates of adverse events up to 1-year follow-up compared to SAVR.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zaman S, Chow C, Lam CSP, Saw J, Nicholls SJ, Figtree GA. Heart Disease in Women: Where Are We Now and What is The Future? Heart Lung Circ 2020; 30:1-2. [PMID: 33261741 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Zaman
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Clara Chow
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carolyn S P Lam
- National Heart Center Singapore, and Duke National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jacqueline Saw
- Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Gemma A Figtree
- Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|