Utility of Zwolle Risk Score in Guiding Low-Risk STEMI Discharge

Applicability of the Zwolle score for selection of very high-risk ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty

The Zwolle risk score was designed to stratify in-hospital mortality risk of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and for decision-making in the unit where patients are admitted. We assessed the accuracy of Zwolle risk score for in-hospital mortality estimation compared with the GRACE score in all patients (n = 4446) admitted for STEMI in 3 university hospitals. Only one fourth of the patients were classified as high-risk by the Zwolle risk score vs 60% by the GRACE score. In-hospital mortality was 10.6%. A statistically significant increase in in-hospital mortality, adjusted by age, gender, and revascularization, was observed with both scores. The assessment of the optimal cut-off points verified the accuracy of Zwolle score ≥4 as optimal threshold for high-risk categorization. In contrast, GRACE score ≥140 had very low specificity as well as percentage of patients correctly classified; GRACE score ≥175 was fairly better. The reclassification index of the Zwolle score after applying the GRACE score was 35.5%. Selection of high-risk STEMI patients treated with pPCI based on the Zwolle risk score has higher specificity than the GRACE score and might be useful in clinical practice.

Using the Zwolle Risk Score at Time of Coronary Angiography to Triage Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Thrombolysis

Background The Zwolle Risk Score was designed to identify the risk of complications in patients with ST-segment‒elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Its utility following PCI in STEMI treated with thrombolysis is unknown. The objective was to evaluate the safety of using the Zwolle Risk Score to triage patients with STEMI following PCI, including patients receiving thrombolysis. Methods and Results Patients aged ≥18 years with STEMI and primary PCI or PCI after thrombolysis were included. A triage protocol was developed, with high-risk patients those with Zwolle Risk Score ≥4 triaged to the cardiac intensive care unit. A prospective evaluation of the triaging protocol was performed on 452 patients, mean age 65±12 years, 73% men. Median Zwolle Risk Score was 3 (interquartile range, 2‒5), with 257 low-risk (57%), and 195 high-risk (43%) patients. Adherence to the protocol was 91%. In-hospital mortality was 0.4% in low-risk and 13% in high-risk patients (P<0.001). Seventy-two patients (16%) received thrombolysis. Median time post-thrombolysis to PCI was 281 minutes (interquartile range, 219‒376). In-hospital mortality was 0% versus 9% (P=0.083) for low- and high-risk patients, respectively. High-risk patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (34% versus 1%, P<0.001), pulmonary edema (60% versus 9%, P<0.001), arrhythmia (25% versus 2%, P<0.001), blood transfusion (10% versus 2%, P<0.001), and stroke (4% versus 0.4%, P=0.011). Median hospital costs decreased by $1419 per low-risk patient after protocol implementation. Conclusions For patients with STEMI following primary PCI or PCI following thrombolysis, a Zwolle-based triaging system is safe and may decrease cardiac intensive care unit usage costs.

Stable STEMI patients rarely require intensive-care level therapy after primary PCI

Background

The disposition of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is commonly the coronary care unit. Recent studies have suggested that low-risk STEMI patients could be managed in a lower-acuity setting immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to determine the frequency of downstream intensive-care therapy used in our “stable” STEMI patients post-PCI.

Methods

A single-centre, retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI between 2013 and 2016. Post-PCI, patients were defined as being stable if they had not required intensive-care therapy or suffered significant complications. Intensive-care therapies and complications were defined as invasive/noninvasive ventilation, pacing, cardiac arrest, use of vasopressors/inotropes, dialysis, stroke, or major bleeding. This group of stable patients had their course followed to discharge.

Results

A total of 731 patients presented with STEMI for primary PCI. Of these, 132 patients (18%) required intensive-care therapies and/or had complications prior to PCI and were excluded. After PCI, 599 STEMI patients (82%) were defined as stable, according to the above definition. Of these, 11 patients (1.8%) required intensive-care therapies during their hospitalization. Zwolle scores were significantly higher in patients with complications (6.3 ± 4.4 vs 2.0 ± 1.5, P < 0.0001). The most frequent intensive-care complications and therapies were cardiac arrest (7 patients, 1%) and vasopressor use (4 patients, 0.7%). These complications most frequently occurred on the first admission day (6 patients, 1%).

Conclusions

Patients who are stable at the completion of their primary PCI rarely develop complications that require intensive care. These patients are easily identified for triage to a lower-acuity setting, alleviating congestion in cardiac care units and reducing hospitalization costs.

A Review of Prognosis Model Associated With Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective: Cardiogenic shock seriously affects the survival rate of patients. However, few prognostic models are concerned with the score of cardiogenic shock, and few clinical studies have validated it. In order to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock and facilitate the classification of clinical trials, the prognosis score model is urgently needed. Methods: Cardiogenic shock, severe case, prognosis score, myocardial infarction and external verification were used as the search terms to search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO (Medline), Scopus, BMC, NCBI, Oxford Academy, Science Direct, and other databases for pertinent studies published up until 1 August 2021. There are no restrictions on publication status and start date. Filter headlines and abstracts to find articles that may be relevant. The list of references for major studies was reviewed to obtain more references. Results and Conclusions: The existing related models are in urgent need of more external clinical verifications. In the meanwhile, with the development of molecular omics and the clinical need for optimal treatment of CS, it is urgent to establish a prognosis model with higher differentiation and coincidence rates.