Right Atrial Pressure Predicts Mortality Among LVAD Recipients: Analysis of the INTERMACS Database

Right ventriculoarterial coupling surrogates and long-term survival in LVAD recipients: Results of the ASSIST-ICD multicentric registry

BACKGROUND

Prediction of outcomes remains an unmet need in LVAD candidates. Development of right heart failure portends an excess in mortality but imaging parameters of right ventricular systolic function have failed to demonstrate a prognostic role. By integrating pulmonary pressure, right ventriculoarterial coupling could fill this gap.

METHODS

The ASSIST-ICD registry was used to test right ventriculoarterial coupling surrogate parameters at implantation for the prediction of all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The ratio of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion over the estimated systolic pulmonary pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) was not associated with long-term survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.89), neither was the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) (p = 0.13). Conversely, the ratio of the right atrial pressure over the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (RAP/PCWP) was associated with all-cause mortality (p <0.01). After taking tricuspid regurgitation severity, LVAD indication, LVAD model, age, blood urea nitrogen, and pulmonary vascular resistance into account, RAP/PCWP remained associated with survival (HR 1.35 [1.10 - 1.65], p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Among pre-implant RVAC surrogates, only RAP/PCWP was associated with long-term all-cause mortality in LVAD recipients. This association was independent of established risk factors.

Utility of Cardiac Power Hemodynamic Measurements in the Evaluation and Risk Stratification of Cardiovascular Conditions

Despite numerous advancements in prevention, diagnosis and treatment, cardiovascular disease has remained the leading cause of mortality globally for the past 20 years. Part of the explanation for this trend is persistent difficulty in determining the severity of cardiac conditions in order to allow for the deployment of prompt therapies. This review seeks to determine the prognostic importance of cardiac power (CP) measurements, including cardiac power output (CPO) and cardiac power index (CPI), in various cardiac pathologies. CP was evaluated across respective disease-state categories which include cardiogenic shock (CS), septic shock, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), heart failure (HF), post-myocardial infarction (MI), critical cardiac illness (CCI) and an "other" category. Literature review was undertaken of articles discussing CP in various conditions and this review found utility and prognostic significance in the evaluation of TAVR patients with a significant correlation between one-year mortality and CPI; in HF patients showing CPI and CPO as valuable tools to assess cardiac function in the acute setting; and, additionally, CPO was found to be an essential tool in patients with CCI, as the literature showed that CPO was statistically correlated with mortality. Cardiac power and the derived measures obtained from this relatively easily obtained variable can allow for essential estimations of prognostic outcomes in cardiac patients.

Twelfth Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Report: Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device

The twelfth annual report from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) highlights outcomes for 26 688 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients over the past decade (2011-2020). In 2020, we observed the largest drop in yearly LVAD implant volumes since the registry's inception, which reflects the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgical volumes in the United States. The 2018 heart transplant allocation policy change in the United States continues to affect LVAD implantation volumes and device strategy, with 78.1% of patients now receiving LVAD implants as destination therapy. Despite an older and sicker patient cohort, survival in the recent era (2016-2020) at 1 and 2 years continues to improve at 82.8% and 74.1%. Patient adverse event profile has also improved in the recent era, with significant reductions in stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, infection, and device malfunction/pump thrombosis. Finally, we review the burden of readmissions after LVAD implant and highlight an opportunity to improve patient outcomes by reducing this frequent and vexing problem.