Management of Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Specific Mutation Predict Relapse/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background

The application of rituximab has significantly enhanced the overall survival rates in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Regrettably, a significant number of patients still progress to relapse/refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL).

Methods

Herein, we employed targeted sequencing of 55 genes to investigate if gene mutations could predict the progression to rrDLBCL. Additionally, we compared the mutation profiles at the time of DLBCL diagnosis with those found in rrDLBCL cases.

Results

Our findings highlighted significantly elevated mutation frequencies of TP53, MEF2B and CD58 in diagnostic biopsies from patients who progressed to relapse or refractory disease, with CD58 mutations exclusively observed in the rrDLBCL group. In assessing the predictive power of mutation profiles for treatment responses in primary DLBCL patients, we found that the frequency of CARD11 mutations was substantially higher in non-response group as compared with those who responded to immunochemotherapy. In addition, we revealed mutations in HIST2H2AB, BCL2, NRXN3, FOXO1, HIST1H1C, LYN and TBL1XR1 genes were only detected in initial diagnostic biopsies, mutations in the EBF1 gene were solely detected in the rrDLBCL patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, this study elucidates some of the genetic mechanisms contributing to the progression of rrDLBCL and suggests that the presence of CD58 mutations might serve as a powerful predictive marker for relapse/refractory outcomes in primary DLBCL patients.

Outcomes of polatuzumab vedotin-containing regimens in real-world setting of relapsed and or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a matched-control analysis from the Thai Lymphoma Study Group (TLSG)

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is a challenging condition to treat, and there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies. Recently, polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC), combined with bendamustine-rituximab (BR), has been approved for R/R DLBCL patients. However, real-world data on Pola-based regimens in R/R DLBCL patients, especially in Thailand, are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. Thirty-five patients who received Pola-based treatment were included in the study, and their data were compared to 180 matched patients who received non-Pola-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) in the Pola group was 62.8%, with complete remission and partial remission rates of 17.1% and 45.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 months and 12.8 months, respectively. The study found a significantly higher ORR in Pola-based salvage treatments compared to non-Pola-based therapy (62.8% vs. 33.3%). The survival outcomes were also significantly superior in the Pola group, with longer median PFS and OS than the control group. Grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were mainly hematological, and they were tolerable. In conclusion, this study provides real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of Pola-based salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients in Thailand. The results of this study are promising and suggest that Pola-based salvage treatment could be a viable option for R/R DLBCL patients who have limited treatment options.

PD-L1 expression predicts efficacy in the phase II SPiReL trial with MVP-S, pembrolizumab, and low-dose CPA in R/R DLBCL

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options.

METHODS

R/R DLBCL patients, who were mostly ineligible for ASCT due to age or comorbidities, were treated with maveropepimut-S (MVP-S, previously DPX-Survivac) a survivin directed T cell educating therapy, pembrolizumab, and intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide.

FINDINGS

We identified, using univariate analysis, a subset of patients with enhanced ORR, PFS and DOR. Patients with baseline CD20+/PD-L1 expression had an ORR of 46% (6/13) and the disease control rate was 10/13 (77%). The PFS and OS of the positive CD20+/PD-L1 patients were 7.1 months and 17.4 months, whereas in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of 25 enrolled patients, the ORR was 28% (7/25), median PFS and OS were 4.2 months and 10.1 months respectively. A total of 6/7 clinical responders occurred in CD20+/PD-L1 patients. The regimen was well-tolerated, requiring only minor dose modifications and one discontinuation. Grade 1 or 2 injection site reactions occurred in 14/25, (56%). Statistically significant associations were also seen between PFS and; injection site reactions; and ELISpot response to survivin peptides, both identifying the mechanistic importance of specific immune responses to survivin.

INTERPRETATION

This immunotherapy combination was found to be active and safe in this clinically challenging patient population.

EZH2 inhibitor DZNep blocks cell proliferation of GCB-DLBCL cells by upregulating p16

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous. Two main subgroups of DLBCL include germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC). Molecular profiling can further classify DLBCL into four subtypes: MCD (both CD79B and MYD88 L265P), BN2 (NOTCH2 mutation or BCL6 fusion), N1 (NOTCH1 mutation), or EZB (EZH2 mutation or BCL2 fusion). EZH2 inhibitors were recommended for patients with the EZB subtype of DLBCLs; however, little is known about the therapeutic mechanisms. Our results showed that DZNep arrested G1/S phase of GCB-DLBCL cells and inhibited the cell proliferation in vitro through upregulation of p16 by demethylating its promoter. These results suggest that DZNep may have potential as a novel therapeutic agent for DFLBL therapy. This agent may serve as a novel molecular agent to be applied to GCB DLBCL.

Indirect Comparison of Tisagenlecleucel and Historical Treatments for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

OS and ORR of tisagenlecleucel were compared with those of historical therapy for r/r DLBCL after ≥2 therapy lines.

Tisagenlecleucel was associated with significantly longer OS and higher response rate vs historical therapy.

No head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy of tisagenlecleucel vs historical treatments for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). This study indirectly compared the overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) associated with tisagenlecleucel, using data from the JULIET study (Study of Efficacy and Safety of CTL019 in Adult DLBCL Patients; #NCT02445248), vs historical treatments assessed in the CORAL (Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma) study follow-up population. To assess treatment effects in the treated (full analysis set [FAS]) and enrolled (intention-to-treat [ITT]) study populations, the JULIET FAS vs the CORAL follow-up FAS and JULIET ITT vs CORAL follow-up ITT populations were separately compared. Propensity score weighting using standardized mortality ratio weight (SMRW) and fine stratification weight (FSW) was used to compare OS and ORR, adjusting for baseline confounders. The results indicated that tisagenlecleucel was associated with a lower hazard of death among the FAS (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], both FSW and SMRW, 0.44 [0.32, 0.59]) and ITT populations (FSW, 0.60 [0.44, 0.77]; SMRW, 0.57 [0.44, 0.73]; all, P < .001). Median OS was 12.48 months (JULIET) vs 4.34 to 4.40 months (CORAL) for the FAS, and 8.25 (JULIET) months vs 4.04 to 4.86 (CORAL) months for the ITT populations. Tisagenlecleucel was associated with a significantly higher ORR compared with historical treatments among the FAS (adjusted response rate difference [95% confidence interval], both FSW and SMRW, 36% [22%, 0.48%]; P < .001) and among the ITT populations after SMRW adjustment (11% [0%, 22%]; P = .043). This analysis supports that improved response and OS are achieved in patients with r/r DLBCL treated with tisagenlecleucel compared with those treated with alternative historical treatments.

Comparative efficacy of tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel among adults with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas: an indirect treatment comparison

This study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response rate (CRR), and overall response rate (ORR) of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (r/r LBCL). Using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), individual patient-level data from JULIET (tisa-cel) were weighted to match the patient population in TRANSCEND (liso-cel). The main analysis compared infused JULIET patients (N = 106) with the TRANSCEND efficacy-evaluable set (EES) (N = 256 [infused]). After adjustment, OS, PFS, and the CRR were comparable between tisa-cel and liso-cel EES patients. The estimated adjusted 2-year OS, 2-year PFS, ORR, and CRR were 45.6, 38.2, 62.9, and 47.7%, respectively, for tisa-cel vs. 43.8, 42.1, 72.7, and 53.1% for liso-cel. A scenario analysis compared JULIET patients to the TRANSCEND primary analysis set (PAS) (N = 133). ORR was significantly higher in the TRANSCEND PAS compared with matched JULIET patients, but no significant differences in CRR were observed.

A phase 2 study of polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Polatuzumab vedotin (pola) is a CD79b‐targeted antibody‐drug conjugate delivering a potent antimitotic agent (monomethyl auristatin E) to B cells. This was an open‐label, single‐arm study of pola 1.8 mg/kg, bendamustine 90 mg/m², rituximab 375 mg/m² (pola + BR) Q3W for up to six cycles in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received ≥1 prior line of therapy and were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or experienced treatment failure with prior ASCT. Primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET‐CT) using modified Lugano Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Thirty‐five patients (median age 71 [range 46‐86] years) were enrolled. Twenty‐three (66%) patients had refractory disease, and 23 (66%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. At a median follow‐up of 5.4 (0.7‐11.9) months, patients received a median of five treatment cycles. CRR was 34.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.1‐52.2) at EOT. Overall response rate was 42.9% at EOT, and median progression‐free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.6‐not evaluable). Median overall survival was not reached. No fatal adverse events (AEs) were observed. Grade 3‐4 AEs were mainly hematological: anemia (37%), neutropenia (31%), white blood cell count decreased (23%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased/neutrophil count decreased (20% each), and febrile neutropenia (11%). Grade 1‐2 peripheral neuropathy (PN; sensory and/or motor) was reported in 14% of patients; there were no ≥grade 3 PN events. This study (JapicCTI‐184048) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pola + BR in Japanese patients with R/R DLBCL who were ineligible for ASCT.

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. A multicenter retrospective analysis of eligibility criteria for car-T cell therapy

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells represent the first approved third-line therapy associated with long-term remissions in patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Eligibility criteria to identify patients who can successfully receive CAR-T are still debated. For this reason, the aim of this study was to identify factors influencing eligibility and define a realistic patient estimate. Of 1100 DLBCL patients, 137 were included. Based on the Juliet trial inclusion criteria, only 64 patients (46.7%) would be eligible. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.04 months in eligible vs 3.23 in non-eligible patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified stage III-IV (p = 0.017) and ECOG ≥2 (p < 0.001) as significant independent prognostic factors for OS. Moreover, only 64/1100 (5.8%) DLBCL patients would be truly eligible for CAR-T. Our real-life data confirm that with a  longer waiting time patients with advanced stage and poor ECOG are less likely to be eligible for CAR-T cell infusion.

Novel Therapies for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

The most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults is diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL). There is a historical unmet need for more effective therapies in the 2nd and 3rd line setting. Emerging immunochemotherapies have shown activity in small studies of heavily pre-treated patients with prolonged remissions achieved in some patients. Anti-CD19 CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T cells are potentially curative in the 3rd line and beyond setting and are under investigation in earlier lines of therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC's) such as polatuzumab vedotin targeting the pan-B-cell marker CD79b has proven effectiveness in multiply-relapsed DLBCL patients. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody producing prolonged remissions when combined with Lenalidomide (LEN) in patients who were not candidates for salvage chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant. Selinexor, an oral, small-molecule selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export (SINE), demonstrated prolonged activity against heavily-pretreated DLBCL without cumulative toxicity and is being investigated as part of an oral, chemotherapy-free regimen for relapsed aggressive lymphoma. This article reviews current strategies and novel therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Antibody-drug conjugates for previously treated aggressive lymphomas: focus on polatuzumab vedotin

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are immunoconjugates and comprise a monoclonal antibody that is chemically attached to a cytotoxic drug (or payload) via a stable chemical linker. Since the approval of the first ADC in 2000, there are now nine different approved agents and over 100 ADCs in the drug-development pipeline.

AREAS COVERED

This review briefly describes the ADCs approved for treatment of lymphoma and their distinguishing factors in terms of target, linker and payload. The clinical implications of the use of ADCs are also considered. Here, we focus on polatuzumab vedotin, an ADC targeted to CD79b, which is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) who have received at least one (EU approval) or two (US approval) prior therapies and are not eligible for bone marrow transplantation. The characteristics of polatuzumab vedotin are discussed and clinical data are presented. The future of polatuzumab vedotin clinical development, and ADCs in general, are also considered.

EXPERT OPINION

ADCs represent a significant advance in the treatment of lymphoma. Polatuzumab vedotin has shown clinical efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in both first-line and R/R DLBCL; future studies are planned to further investigate this ADC.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor-T cells in the treatment of B cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Conventional treatment has limited efficacy in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. Since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) technology has shown high safety and results in high remission rates, we investigated its efficacy and safety in B-cell lymphoma treatment and analyzed potential affecting factors to provide evidence for therapeutic strategies and applications.

METHODS

We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to July 2019. Meta-analysis 1 was conducted to study the efficacy of CAR-T cell for treating B-cell lymphoma, measuring the response rate and complete remission rate as outcomes. Sub-group analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, and conditioning chemotherapy. Meta-analysis 2 was undertaken on the safety of the treatment with the incidence rate of toxicity (cytokine-releasing syndrome [CRS], neurotoxicity) as an outcome.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. It was found that CAR-T cells had good therapeutic effects in the following cases: B-cell lymphoma (patients ≥65 years old); diffuse large B-cell lymphoma pathological type; patients with treatment target antigen other than CD19; patients treated with co-stimulatory molecules other than CD28, including 4-1BB+CD28 or 4-1BB; and patients treated with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine pre-treatment protocol conditioning chemotherapy. Although the CRS and neurotoxicity incidences were high, most were reversible with minimal risk of death.

CONCLUSION

CAR-T cell treatment is safe for clinical application; however, toxicity effects should be monitored.

An Engineered Fusion Protein Anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM Effectively Inhibits ADR-Resistant B Cell Lymphoma

The 5-year survival rate of patients with B cell lymphoma is about 50% after initial diagnosis, mainly because of resistance to chemotherapy. Hence, it is necessary to understand the mechanism of chemo-resistance and to explore novel methods to circumvent multidrug resistance. Previously, we showed that an engineered cytotoxic fusion protein anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM (lidamycin), can induce apoptosis of B-lymphoma cells. Herein, we successfully established an adriamycin (ADR)-resistant B cell lymphoma cell line BJAB/ADR. The mRNA and protein level of ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) were significantly overexpressed in BJAB/ADR cells. Increased efflux function of ABCB1 was observed by analyzing intracellular accumulation and efflux of Rhodamine 123. The efflux of Rhodamine 123 could be significantly ameliorated by verapamil. Treatment with anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM at different concentrations induced cytotoxic response of BJAB/ADR cells similar to that of the sensitive cells. In vivo studies showed that anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM had better antitumor effect in BJAB and BJAB/ADR cell lymphoma xenografts compared with ADR or LDM treatment alone. Taken together, anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM can effectively inhibit the growth of BJAB/ADR cells both in vitro and in vivo. Anti-CD19(Fab)-LDM could be a promising molecule for the treatment of drug resistant cancers.

Predicting Outcomes in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Standard of Care

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), predictive modeling may contribute to targeted drug development by enrichment of the study populations enrolled in clinical trials of DLBCL investigational drugs to include patients with lower likelihood of responding to standard of care. In clinical practice, predictive modeling has the potential to optimize therapy choices in DLBCL. The objectives of this study were to create a model for predicting health outcomes in patients with DLBCL treated with standard of care and determine informative predictors of health outcomes for patients with DLBCL. This was a retrospective observational study using data extracted from the IMS Health Database between September 2007 and April 2015. Patients were ⩾18 years of age with a DLBCL diagnosis. The index date was the date of the first DLBCL diagnosis. Patients were followed until outcome occurrence, defined as progression to a later line of therapy after ⩾60 days from the end of a previous therapy or stem cell transplantation. Patients were categorized into three cohorts depending on the post-index observation period: ⩽1 year, ⩽3 years, or ⩽5 years. Lasso logistic regression (LASSO), Naive Bayes, gradient-boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and neural network models were performed for each cohort. The best-performing algorithms were predictive models based on GBM and observation periods ⩽1 and ⩽3 years after index date. Informative predictors included myocardial imaging, DLBCL stage IV, bronchiolar and renal disease, a chemotherapy regimen, and exposure to diphenhydramine and vasoprotectives on or before the first DLBCL diagnosis. These predictive models may be applied to targeted drug development and have the potential to optimize therapy choices in DLBCL. They were generated efficiently using a large number of independent variables readily available in standard insurance claims or electronic health record data systems.

Evaluation of treatment patterns and survival among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the USA

AIM

To evaluate treatment patterns of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

PATIENTS & METHODS

First-line and relapsed/refractory treatment patterns and survival outcomes following first-line therapy in adult patients newly diagnosed with DLBCL were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1436 DLBCL patients initiated treatment and mainly received a combination regimen versus monotherapy (92.1 vs 7.9%). Patients who received monotherapy were older with more comorbidities and had shorter progression-free survival than patients receiving combination therapy (median: 31.3 vs 55.8 months). In the second-line setting (n = 164), rituximab-based combination regimens were most common; 25% underwent stem cell transplantation, and were younger with fewer comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

These results illustrate the need for new treatment options for patients unable to tolerate initial combination therapy and transplant-ineligible patients who require salvage therapy.

CAR T cell therapy for B-cell lymphomas

B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHLs)is a very heterogonous malignancy with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) as the most common subtypes. Standard treatment with anti-CD20 based chemoimmunotherapy is usually very effective for disease control. However a significant proportion of patients with high-risk features (double hit lymphoma, transformed lymphomas or early relapses) will become refractory to standard therapies and will have limited alternatives for cure. Adoptive therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells is a new paradigm for effective treatment of poor prognosis lymphomas. Here we review the biology of poor risk DLBCL and FL, the rationale for CAR T-cell therapy in malignant lymphoma and the efficacy/toxicity profile of CD19 directed CAR T cell therapy for DLBCL and FL from early single center studies to multicenter/global clinical trial with different CAR T cell constructs.

Utility of routine surveillance imaging for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma post autologous transplant: A single center experience

Surveillance scans after autologous stem cell transplant (auto-HCT) for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) diffuse large B Cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have no proven survival benefit. We studied survival differences among patients with RR DLBCL post auto-HCT whose recurrences were detected clinically versus with routine surveillance imaging. Among the 139 patients with RR DLBCL that underwent auto-HCT from 2000 to 2014 at our institution, 37 relapsed: 21 clinical and 16 radiological. The median time to progression was 167 days for the clinical cohort and 565 days for the radiological cohort (p = 0.03), and median overall survival (OS) was 587 days and not reached, respectively (p = 0.006). Most patients with relapsed DLBCL after auto-HCT were diagnosed clinically and were likely to be detected earlier and have a shorter OS. Relapse in patients with aggressive disease will likely be detected when clinically apparent, and the outcome of these patients is independent of the way the relapse is diagnosed. Thus, universal scanning after auto-HCT appears to have little benefit.

Concise Review: Emerging Principles from the Clinical Application of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapies for B Cell Malignancies

Gene-engineered T cell therapies are soon to be United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for at least two types of B cell malignancies in pediatric and adult patients, in the form of CD19 targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy. This represents a triumph of a true bench to bedside clinical translation of a therapy that was conceived of in the early 1990s. Clinical results have demonstrated efficacious responses in patients with the CD19 positive diseases B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. However, significant challenges have emerged, including worrisome immune-related toxicities, therapy resistance, and understanding how to administer CD19 CAR T cells in clinical practice. Although much remains to be learned, pioneering clinical trials have led to foundational insights about the clinical translation of this novel therapy. Here, we review the "lessons learned" from the pre-clinical and human experience with CAR T cell therapy. Stem Cells 2018;36:36-44.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder After Clinical Islet Transplantation: Report of the First Two Cases

We report the first two cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in recipients of islet transplants worldwide. First, a 44-year-old recipient of three islet infusions developed PTLD 80 months after his initial transplantation, presenting with abdominal pain and diffuse terminal ileum thickening on imaging. He was treated with surgical excision, reduction of immunosuppression, and rituximab. Seven months later, he developed central nervous system PTLD, presenting with vertigo and diplopia; immunosuppression was discontinued, resulting in graft loss, and he was given high-dose methotrexate and underwent consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. He remains in remission 37 months after the initial diagnosis. Second, a 58-year-old female recipient of two islet infusions developed PTLD 24 months after initial islet infusion, presenting with pancytopenia secondary to extensive bone marrow involvement. Immunosuppression was discontinued, resulting in graft loss, and she received rituximab and chemotherapy, achieving complete remission. Both patients were monomorphic B cell PTLD subtype by histology and negative for Epstein-Barr virus in tissue or blood. These cases document the first occurrences of this rare complication in islet transplantation, likely secondary to prolonged, intensive immunosuppression, and highlight the varying clinical manifestations of PTLD. Further studies are needed to determine incidence rate and risk factors in islet transplantation.