1
|
Yee EJ, Torphy RJ, Thielen ON, Easwaran L, Franklin O, Sugawara T, Bartsch C, Garduno N, McCarter MM, Ahrendt SA, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Radiologic Occult Metastases in Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis of Risk Factors and Survival Outcomes in the Age of Contemporary Neoadjuvant Multi-agent Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:6127-6137. [PMID: 38780693 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15443-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiologic occult metastatic disease (ROMD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo contemporary neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been well studied. This study sought to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and oncologic outcomes for patients who underwent the NAC approach for PDAC. METHODS A retrospective review analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who had potentially resectable PDAC treated with NAC and were offered pancreatectomy at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with ROMD. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank analyses were generated to estimate time-to-event end points. RESULTS The study enrolled 366 patients. Upfront and borderline resectable anatomic staging comprised 80% of the cohort, whereas 20% had locally advanced disease. The most common NAC regimen was FOLFIRINOX (n = 274, 75%). For 55 patients (15%) who harbored ROMD, the most common site was liver-only metastases (n = 33, 60%). The independent risk factors for ROMD were increasing CA19-9 levels during NAC (odds ratio [OR], 7.01; confidence interval [CI], 1.97-24.96; p = 0.008), indeterminate liver lesions (OR, 2.19; CI, 1.09-4.39; p = 0.028), and enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes (OR, 6.87; CI, 2.07-22.74; p = 0.002) on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Receipt of palliative chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and eventual formal pancreatectomy (p = 0.04) were associated with survival benefit in the log-rank analysis. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients with ROMD was nearly 15 months from the initial diagnosis, with radiologic evidence of metastases occurring after a median of 2 months. CONCLUSIONS Radiologic occult metastatic disease remains a clinical challenge associated with poor outcomes for patients who have PDAC treated with multi-agent NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott J Yee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Otto N Thielen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lavanya Easwaran
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Oskar Franklin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Christan Bartsch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Garduno
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Martin M McCarter
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Steven A Ahrendt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schulick AC, Moore HB, Franco SR, Jiang JG, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Nydam TL, McCarter MD, Del Chiaro M, Gleisner A. Gaining a new angle on pancreas cancer: A pre-operative thrombelastographic parameter predicts recurrence and survival among patients with resected periampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2024; 238:115820. [PMID: 39059340 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has previously been demonstrated that Thrombelastography(TEG) angle may be associated with recurrence and survival in pancreas cancer in a cohort of patients operated on at the University of Colorado in 2016-2017. Now approaching 10 years of follow-up, we revisit these associations and strengthen these claims with multivariate analysis. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves identified the performance of angle for predicting recurrence&survival. Unadjusted and adjusted cox regression models were used to identify significant predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS 47 patients were included with median follow-up of 29.6 months. ROC curves for angle predicting recurrence and survival identified a cutoff of 44.5°. KM curves demonstrated that patients above the cutoff were more likely to recur(90%vs46 %,p = 0.001) and less likely to survive(16%vs56 %,p = 0.001). Angle remained significant on multivariate analyses (HR recurrence:3.64[1.32-10.25],HR survival:3.80[1.38-10.46]). CONCLUSIONS TEG angle is independently associated with disease recurrence and overall survival in pancreas cancer. This may be identifying virulent tumor biology, but further studies are required. A prospective study is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.
| | - Hunter B Moore
- AdventHealth Transplant Institute Porter, Denver, United States
| | | | - Jessie G Jiang
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| | - Barish H Edil
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Oklahoma City, United States
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| | - Trevor L Nydam
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He J, Lv N, Yang Z, Luo Y, Zhong W, Wu C. Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3900-3909. [PMID: 38935819 PMCID: PMC11175811 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to explore the optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategy for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the development of new neoadjuvant treatment protocols for clinical use. PATIENTS AND METHODS The authors reviewed literature titles and abstracts comparing three treatment strategies (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and upfront surgery) in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science from 2009 to 2023 to estimate relative odds ratios for resection rate and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in all include trials. RESULTS A total of nine studies involving 889 patients were included in the analysis. The treatment methods included upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The network meta-analysis results demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was an effective approach in improving OS for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients compared to upfront surgery (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98). Additionally, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the margin negative resection (R0) rate and pathological negative lymph node (pN0) rate in patients with resectable and borderline RPC. However, it is worth noting that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increased the risk of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, including in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the optimal choice for treating patients with resectable and borderline RPC. Future research should focus on optimizing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens to effectively improve OS while reducing the occurrence of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Chunli Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muaddi H, Kearse L, Warner S. Multimodal Approaches to Patient Selection for Pancreas Cancer Surgery. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2260-2273. [PMID: 38668070 PMCID: PMC11049254 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
With an overall 5-year survival rate of 12%, pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer that claims more than 50,000 patient lives each year in the United States alone. Even those few patients who undergo curative-intent resection with favorable pathology reports are likely to experience recurrence within the first two years after surgery and ultimately die from their cancer. We hypothesize that risk factors for these early recurrences can be identified with thorough preoperative staging, thus enabling proper patient selection for surgical resection and avoiding unnecessary harm. Herein, we review evidence supporting multidisciplinary and multimodality staging, comprehensive neoadjuvant treatment strategies, and optimal patient selection for curative-intent surgical resections. We further review data generated from our standardized approach at the Mayo Clinic and extrapolate to inform potential future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susanne Warner
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA; (H.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ, Wolfgang CL, van Tienhoven G, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Wilmink JW, Del Chiaro M, Katz MHG, Hackert T, Besselink MG. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:101-124. [PMID: 38036745 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rutger T Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fusai GK, Raptis DA, Hilal MA, Bassi C, Besselink M, Conlon K, Davidson B, Del Chiaro M, Dervenis C, Frigerio I, Falconi M, Hackert T, Harrison EM, Shrikhande SV, Siriwardena A, Smith M, Wolfgang C, Borakati A, Balci D, Elhadi M, Salinas CH, Machairas N, Marchegiani G, Oba A, Oberkofler C, Passas I, Ravikumar R, Velázquez PS, de Santibañes M, Schnitzbauer AA, Soggiu F, Tamburrino D, Tinguely P, Wei A, Zachiotis M, Bentabak K, Kacimi SE, Nikfarjam M, Shcherba A, Sergeant G, Coelho G, Torres O, Belev N, Tang E, Diaz C, Wei K, Hendi M, Gouvas N, Christophides T, Nikov A, Fathallah D, Saad M, Tammik O, Huhta H, Sulpice L, Lupinacci R, Demetrashvili Z, Stavrou GA, Felekouras GE, Papaziogas V, Misra S, Talib H, Al-Sader MAJ, Satoi S, Obeidat K, Fakhradiyev I, Khalife M, Elhadi M, Dulskas A, Ghani S, Padilla AE, Melchor-Ruan J, Erdene S, Benkabbou A, Nashidengo P, Koea J, Adeyeye NA, Amro S, Alnammourah WM, The C, Pędziwiatr M, Polkowski W, Barbu ST, Galun D, Goh BKP, Trotovšek B, Omoshoro-Jones J, Ielpo B, Abdelmageed A, Sandström P, Cristaudi A, Gloor B, Kuemmerli C, Tishreen AH, Chaaban MK, Wu CH, Jen PCYF, Baraket O, Taylor M, Jamieson N, Iype S, Giorgakis E, Qadan M, Ganai S, Al-Naggar H, Chihaka O, El Behi A, Kouicem AT, Chibane A, Bouzid C, Bentabak K, Bouali I, Samai N, Aya B, Drid B, Tidjane A, Tabeti B, Boudjenan-Serradj N, Larbi MH, Ouahab I, Touabti S, Ilhem O, Bouaoud S, Meriem A, Ouyahia A, Kouicem AT, Abdoun M, Mounira R, Rais M, Riffi O, Kacimi SE, McCormack L, Capitanich P, Goransky J, de Santibanes M, Mazza O, Salazar IP, Ramallo DR, Pablo F, Gondolesi GE, Schelotto PB, Rodriguez J, Apostolou C, Merrett N, Fox A, Hassen S, Joglekar S, Gananadha S, Wake R, Hagen K, Sritharan M, Hall K, Muralidharan V, Brown K, Nikfarjam M, Croagh D, Sritharan M, Berry R, Fayed A, Hodgson R, Kuany T, Loveday B, Banting S, Rowcroft A, Fox A, Knowles B, Taylor L, Chong L, Banting S, Perini M, Nikfarjam M, Lin YJ, Alsoudani A, Burnett D, Shah K, Fuge M, Bull N, Chen S, Navadgi S, Ng ZQ, Johansson M, Azaman NSBB, Pearson A, Apostolou C, Mischinger H, Schemmer P, Kornprat P, Hauer A, Hauer A, Kirbes K, Klug R, Schrittwieser R, Klaus A, Entschev A, Reichhold D, Ugrekhelidze K, Fink M, Stoyanova R, Sabateen M, Mahfoodh Z, Shenawi HA, Yaghan R, Chowdhury M, Shcherba A, Kirkovsky L, Korotkov S, Van den Bossche B, Boterbergh K, Poortmans M, Smet B, Strypstein S, Feryn T, Wahib EM, oubella S, Roeyen G, Hartman V, Bracke B, Hendrikx B, Gryspeerdt F, Berrevoet F, Poortmans N, Apers T, Appeltans B, Appeltans B, Wicherts D, Sergeant G, Garcia FOB, dos Santos IB, Garcia R, Pinto R, Leite TLS, Anghinoni M, Nobre CCG, Coelho G, Machado IFS, Carvalho N, Morais L, Barros AV, Gomes G, Buarque IL, Osvaldt AB, Militz M, Boff M, Marcelino L, Guerra E, Torelly L, Waechter FL, Rodrigues P, Teixeira UF, Osvaldt A, Marcelino L, Militz M, De Mello E, Goncalves R, Balzan S, Ramos EJB, Moraes-Junior JMA, Torres OJM, da Silva DV, Coimbra F, Coimbra FJF, Marques N, Marques N, Torres SM, Sampaio A, Canteras CA, Ferreira F, Machado MA, Kleinubing D, Lellis L, Brum SL, Gohar M, Atanasov B, Slavchev MT, Slavchev M, Belev N, Krastev P, Takorov I, Vladov N, Kostadinov R, Lukanova T, Mihaylov V, Chernopolsky PM, Madjov R, Bozhkov VM, Kostov VD, Kostov D, Nikolaev E, Muhezagiro F, Niyonkuru J, Irakoze P, Dixon E, Lo E, Ruo L, D'Souza D, Serrano PE, Skaro A, Tang E, Glinka J, Martin J, Zogopoulos G, Metrakos P, Chaudhury P, Torres-Quevedo R, Brañes A, Brañes A, Diaz C, Buckel E, Butte J, Devaud N, Paqui L, Wei K, Wang H, Cai L, Guo S, Chen Y, Hendi M, Cheung TT, Millan C, Argüello P, Pavlek G, Silovski H, Petrovic I, Romic I, Zedelj J, Amic F, Kolovrat M, Rakic M, Mikulic D, Štironja I, Bubalo T, Gouvas N, Papatheodorou P, Christophides T, Burda L, Straka M, Klos D, Tesarikova J, Loveček M, Gregorik M, Skalicky P, Stögerová C, Fichtl J, TomአS, Zaruba P, Nikov A, Tschuor C, Mohamed M, Sayed B, Shaheen A, Farid A, Attalla A, Ibrahim DF, Fathallah D, Elmzaien E, Magdy B, Salah S, Saleh A, Saker AAE, Swealem A, Sallam EI, Rozza H, Bassiony M, Elhassan M, Elmalah M, Belal M, El Gohary M, Hassanin MA, Elsayed N, Aboelfath S, El-Sayes I, Tayiawi M, Altatari A, Altatari AM, Saleh A, Qatora MS, Said M, Najjar A, Alahmed F, Zamri FMB, Ealreibi H, Alahmed H, Alyasin I, Abdelhalim K, Alfatah MA, Sharaan MA, El Moneam MA, Abdelalemm M, Mourad M, Sohaimee NB, Abosamak NE, Suhaimi NMFB, Shokralla S, Dean YE, Tanas Y, Waffa Z, Nafea A, Ramadan D, Abdelaal A, Mahmoud A, Nafea AM, Abuali ASAME, Korayem I, Fahmy M, Ibraheem M, Hamouda M, Helaly R, Khdour YF, Khdour Y, Farag M, Ibrahim A, Elareibi HE, Alboridy M, Mansour A, Ragab MG, Naguib M, Allam S, Elfarag HA, Elsakka A, Mannaa D, Elkeleny M, Suhaimi NAB, Uzir SSBM, Nasr S, El-Najjar A, Dohien M, Dohien M, Osman N, Gad N, Hassanin M, Fadel BA, Hamdan EHM, Monib F, Saad M, Abbas A, Abu-Elfatth AM, Elazeem HAA, Abdelhafez MHZ, Omar N, Hassan R, Mohamed A, Mahmoud SH, Abobakr AM, Mohamed EEE, Ahmed R, Hamza HM, Mohammed M, Marshod MA, Hussein AMM, Taha A, Ibrahim I, Nageh MA, Fouly MN, Hassan RA, Mohamed AKA, Elnabi MH, Salah M, Ali AYM, Sayed EGA, Sayad R, Saad MM, Abdelkarem M, Omar NG, Khalifa A, Faragalla H, Barakat A, Barakat ATM, Elshafey A, Eleisawy MF, Eleisawy M, Zahed MSM, Zahed M, Omer M, Allam M, Abuelnaga Y, Abdelzaher A, Alnimr A, Dabbous H, Sayed H, Elgarhy I, Elmeteini M, Bahaa M, Farag M, Eid M, Anas O, Ismail O, Nageeb O, Lasheen R, Tanyous S, Diab S, Badran Y, Fahim A, Alazab E, Elgarhy IM, Abdeljalil M, Hanna M, Gobran M, Gobran M, Abdelmawla MOMK, Nagy M, Nageeb OE, Ramadan S, Abdelmawgoud S, Zidan T, Abuelnaga Y, Tarkhan Y, Saad A, Awad AK, Elbadawy MA, Abdelmawla M, Mansy E, Moharam M, Elabd M, Eldabour A, Elwakil L, Hassanien MS, Elnashar A, Saleh HED, Michail M, Said A, El Garhy M, Ahmed MBE, Anas O, Ismail O, Abboud K, Nabil A, Elfiky M, Murad A, Azzam A, Azab MA, Awad S, Othman Z, Fahim AM, Abdelzaher AT, Zidan T, Abdelrhman R, Tolis EAN, Salem M, Ebrahim H, Abdelrazek HA, Abdelmoneim N, Salman D, Saa'd H, Ali D, Farouk A, Mandor AR, Monier A, Shehta A, Kassem A, Sanad A, Elsaadany R, Shaat MM, Elmorsi R, Awad S, Ghedan S, Menessy A, Elnabawy D, Abdou K, Abdelmaksoud M, Hassan M, Elweza O, Elboraei R, Abdallah A, Metwally IH, Elhamamsy M, Fareed AM, Zuhdy M, Elbalka SS, Alansary MN, Omar M, Elgharably AA, Hager E, El Gady A, Alsharif DS, Shaaban AM, Alsharif D, Samaan D, Samaan SSS, Oteem A, Shaaban AM, Alsharif DS, Samaan S, Zayed A, Allam A, El Gady A, Alsharif DS, Badr K, Elnoamany S, Samaan SS, Ellibady M, Ahmed EA, Elbassyiouny A, Boalot A, Badr H, Gamal M, Abuelazm M, Othman Z, Eldaly A, Eldaly AS, Essa M, Abdelrahman F, Sarhan A, Alsabbagh F, Allah MA, Bayomi A, Salama M, kivisild M, Tammik O, Podramagi T, Huhta H, Kauppila JH, Nortunen M, Jouffret L, Sommacale D, Brustia R, Cherif R, Lecolle K, El Amrani M, Beugniez C, Truant S, Piessen G, Degisors S, Dupré A, Perinel J, Adham M, Sgarbura O, Souche FR, Iannelli A, Gugenheim J, Savvala N, Scatton O, Lupinacci R, Ragot E, Manceau G, Karoui M, Goasguen N, Anyla M, Gaujoux S, Rhaiem R, Piardi T, Robin F, Sulpice L, Roussel E, Papet E, Schwarz L, Felli E, Giannone F, Pessaux P, Pipia I, Khutsishvili K, Demetrashvili Z, Krones C, Wüllenweber HP, Bartella I, Kamphues C, Loch F, Pozios I, Belyaev O, Mohan PV, Uhl W, Bulian D, Juengling N, Thomaidis P, Korn S, Welsch T, Bork U, Praetorius C, Weitz J, Distler M, Krautz C, Brunner M, Grützmann R, Mazzella E, Hecker A, Reichert M, Azizian A, Gaedcke J, Ghadimi M, Aghdassi A, Döbereiner J, Klose J, Kleeff J, Ronellenfitsch U, Oldhafer KJ, Wagner K, Reese T, Heumann A, Uzunoglu FG, Izbicki J, Goetz M, Scognamiglio P, Honselmann K, Keck T, Wellner U, Struecker B, Hackl C, Brennfleck FW, Brunner S, Kardassis D, Schütze F, Stavrou GA, Ghamarnejad O, Metzger R, Koenigsrainer A, Nadalin S, Anthoni C, Makridis G, Farkas SA, Löb S, Nikou E, Tsoukalas N, Bairamidis E, Vaia A, Prountzopoulou A, Fradelos E, Kechagias A, Kelgiorgi D, Avgerinos K, Ioannidis A, Konstantinidis KM, Konstantinidis MK, Papakonstantinou D, Papiri I, Michalopoulos N, Petropoulou Z, Christodoulou S, Margaris I, Chatzialis I, Selmani J, Papadoliopoulou M, Arkadopoulos N, Kokoropoulos P, Vassiliu P, Parasyris S, Sidiropoulos T, Stamopoulos P, Stergiou D, Sotiropoulou M, Vaslamatzis M, Roukounakis N, Kapiris SA, Kapiris SA, Vougas V, Roukounakis N, Dimitroulis D, Mantas D, Kotsifa E, Kotsifa E, Tomara N, Tomara NK, Machairas N, Dorovinis P, Kykalos S, Tsirlis T, Larentzakis A, Vrakopoulou GZ, Tzimas G, Pagkratis S, Triantafyllidis I, Papalampros A, Polydorou A, Syllaios A, Kontopoulou C, Politis D, Vouros D, Schizas D, Kyros E, Felekouras E, Karavokyros I, Griniatsos J, Bramis K, Toutouzas K, Karydakis L, Konstadoulakis M, Memos N, Kanavidis P, Massaras D, Fragulidis G, Frountzas M, Kordeni K, Vezakis A, Iliakopoulos K, Chardalias L, Kyriazanos I, Kyriazanos I, Marougkas M, Stamos N, Giannakopoulos T, Kalles V, Balalis D, Manatakis D, Korkolis D, Bourazani M, Delis S, Cyrochristos D, Baltagiannis E, Glantzounis G, Stylianidis S, Diamantis A, Valaroutsos A, Magouliotis D, Zacharoulis D, Christodoulidis G, Tepetes K, Perivoliotis K, Fergadi M, Tsiotos G, Mulita F, Maroulis I, Vailas M, Zygomalas A, Karavias D, Kontis E, Katsaros I, Kopanakis N, Tooulias A, Christou C, Raptis D, Katsanos G, Beradze N, Papaziogas V, Papadopoulos VN, Giakoustidis D, Katsourakis A, Efthymiou E, Chatzis I, Ntinas A, Hatzitheoklitos E, Tsalis K, Koustas P, Apostolos K, Petras P, Tsaramanidis S, Iakovidis C, Zacharakis E, Marjai T, Bursics A, Dede K, Tölgyes T, Vereczkei A, Kelemen D, Robert P, Vasavada B, Vaishnav D, Pawar P, Suryawanshi P, Shinde RM, Piplani C, Singh A, Sahu SK, Choudhary SR, Gupta R, Ramamurthy A, Babu E, Karuparthi S, Kumar S, Purushothaman G, Sathyanesan J, Venkatesh NR, John S, Singh AK, Gupta R, Singh SK, Sharma D, Yadav K, Leekha N, Pippari R, Pandey M, Francis NJ, Kumar T, Jain S, Poonia DR, Vishnoi JR, Sharma N, Pareek P, Byshetty R, Misra S, Varshney V, Ray R, Gulati S, Ghatak S, Das K, Khamrui S, Ray S, Sebastian GM, Chand JT, Appukuttan M, Chaturvedi A, Akhtar N, Prakash P, Gupta S, Rajan S, Kumar V, Sonkar AA, Ozair A, Suresh V, Virk S, Narasimhan M, Ardhanari R, Ramachandran S, Jain D, Velagala JR, Chattopadhyay S, Vodyala C, Velagala JR, Motwani K, Prajapati R, Tilak S, Bansal V, Kalayarasan R, Bhalerao S, S IP, Chisthi MM, A N, Latheef A, Yadev I, Sreekumar RC, Yadev I, KV V, Pandey D, Tripathi M, Fuadi AF, Prabowo E, Abbood AH, Hammoodi H, Al-juaifari MA, Al-Isawi A, Al-Tekreeti S, Al-Ogaili M, Hashim HT, Sadot E, Apel R, Sulimani O, Solomonov E, Itzhaki O, Lavy R, Shapira Z, Nicolini D, Vivarelli M, Rossi MDR, Mocchegiani F, Memeo R, Vincenti L, Fedele S, Andriola V, Gurrado A, Meo GD, Testini M, Neri V, Zironda A, Trizzino A, Pinelli D, Colledan M, Pizzini P, Cirelli R, Masetti M, Zanello M, Jovine E, Mastrangelo L, Lombardi R, Casadei R, Malpaga A, Frena A, Patauner S, Ciola M, Andreuccetti J, Manzoni A, Hilal MA, de Graaf N, Alfano MS, Molfino S, Baiocchi GL, Pisanu A, Mellano A, Papa MV, Carlo ID, Donati M, Zanatta M, Basile PF, Antonucci A, Papis D, Pighin M, Celotti A, Sasia D, Allisiardi F, Borghi F, Maione F, Giraudo G, Migliore M, Salomone S, Giaccardi S, Testa V, Giacometti M, Zonta S, Taddei A, Risaliti M, Muiesan P, Urciuoli I, Bencini L, Moraldi L, Anastasi A, Canonico G, Nelli T, Storto GL, D'Acapito F, Ercolani G, Solaini L, Cucchetti A, Gardini A, Pacilio CA, Barberis A, Filauro M, De Cian F, Valente R, Didomenico S, Papadia FS, Di Domenico S, De Rosa R, Massobrio A, Scabini S, Carganico G, Pessia B, Sista F, Schietroma M, Spampinato MG, Garritano S, D'Ugo S, Marchese T, Saladino E, Cuticone G, Gullá N, Recordare A, Palumbo R, Giani A, Ferrari G, Mazzola M, Dondossola D, Rossi G, Caccamo L, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Montorsi M, Coppa J, Busset MDD, Mazzaferro V, Troci A, Frontali A, Crespi M, Baldi C, Benuzzi L, Ferrara F, Stella M, Capurso G, Falconi M, Tamburrino D, Benedetto FD, Magistri P, Ballarin R, Zanus G, Brizzolari M, Uggeri F, Gianotti L, Cereda M, Ferraro D, Iacomino A, Ferraro D, Pisaniello D, Vennarecci G, Pisaniello D, Rompianesi G, Troisi RI, Patrone R, Belli A, Izzo F, Palaia R, Gianpaolo M, Maida P, Pasquale T, Bassi D, Cillo U, Moletta L, Sperti C, Serafini S, Milanetto AC, Pasquali C, Tolin F, Gruppo M, De Simoni O, Buscemi S, Marino MV, Giuffrida M, Dallavalle R, Calabretto F, Cobianchi L, Pugliese L, Giardino A, Butturini G, Regi P, Kauffmann EF, Di Franco G, Morelli L, Furbetta N, Napoli N, Boggi U, Pinotti E, Montuori M, Giuliani A, Izzo ML, Zanini N, Veneroni L, Giordano M, Palini GM, Garulli G, Vaccara VL, de Rose AM, Giuliante F, Ardito F, Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Lapolla P, Petrucciani N, Cossa A, Coppola A, Belloni E, Nigri G, Tisone G, Angelico R, Manzia TM, Caputo D, Saverio SD, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Deiana G, Sartarelli L, Pisconti S, Tonini V, Patrono D, Moro F, Grasso L, Brolese A, Ciarleglio F, Marcucci S, Nistri C, Massani M, Tommaso S, Galasso E, Zanus G, Brizzolari M, Romano M, Rossi S, Novello S, Ferrero A, Langella S, Armentano S, Russolillo N, Dario L, Intini S, Giovanni T, Recordare AG, Pirozzolo G, Palumbo R, Calabrese F, Querini G, Zonta S, Caneparo A, Giacometti M, De Francesco M, Balduzzi A, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Iacono C, Poletto E, Marchegiani G, Isa G, Malleo G, Alaimo L, Salvia R, Conci S, Crinò SF, Campagnaro T, Frigerio I, De Marchi F, Bonomo M, Napetti S, Frontali A, Chierici A, Cotsoglou C, Gjoni E, Paleino S, Granieri S, Hashimoto D, Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Uemura K, Matsumoto I, Kamei K, Maehira H, Tani M, Hirano S, Nakamura T, Asano T, Akahoshi K, Tanabe M, Ishii T, H Al Saffaf M, Hamoud MA, Khattab R, Alissawi S, Hassouneh A, Al-Maadani B, Alali MB, Hmdan QA, Obed A, Nijadat D, Al-Shami K, Al-shami M, Mohsen M, Al-Mallah R, Albaba S, Theab M, Massadeh N, Theab RAK, Wardeh S, Salahwardeh, Alissawi SZ, Mardini A, Arabiyat HAA, Arabiyat H, Al-Hyari A, Ababneh H, Naffa' MF, Buwaitel MM, Al-Mekhlafi A, Rababa H, Alzoubi M, Khamees A, Abuleil A, Almiani S, Obeidat K, Amarin Z, Al-Samawi A, Hammoud AAA, Hammad H, Alkhadem MA, Mahafdah MR, AlSaffaf M, Alsabah M, Hani MB, Hamoud MAAL, Alzghoul MW, Khattab RN, Shumrakh SK, Rababah A, Alghazo H, Rababah T, Khamees A, Awadi S, Sharie SA, Abdelnoor A, Shaout DM, Omarieh Q, Abu-Ghazal SY, Abu-Ghazal S, Shaout D, Abughazal SY, Fakhradiyev I, Tanabayeva S, Saliev T, Issabekov I, Spatayev Z, Han HS, Jo Y, Plaudis H, Martinsone KD, Atstupens K, Jawad M, Khalife M, Faraj WG, Alowjali F, Albaraesi MN, Aldressi W, Benamwor A, Ali SB, Saleh S, Alshatshat A, Younes E, Younes E, Ekhmaj R, Bahroun S, Bahroun SG, Ekhmaj R, Bahroun SG, Burgan D, Aalem HAA, El Hussain RK, Morgom M, Alshareea E, Ellafi AAD, Shoukrie S, Shamakhi TMO, Bareig E, Abusannuga M, Dkhakhni A, Gerwash AA, Gerwash A, Zawia A, Othman E, Binnawara M, Abdalsalam SJA, Aljamal S, Ahmeed S, Khalil WIA, Khalel W, Faraj T, Elhajdawe F, Emhemed M, Salem O, Abdulwahed E, Khalil W, Rhuma H, Alsori M, Mustafa T, Albarouni S, Albishti A, Elhadi M, Elkhuja T, Msherghi A, Hasan NSB, Hasan HB, Hasan NB, Gulbinas A, Barauskas G, Ignatavicius P, Riauka R, Vanagas T, Slepavicius A, Jurgaitis J, Dailidenas S, Eismontas V, Mikutaitis V, Šlepavičius A, Jurgaitis J, Mikutaitis V, Dulskas A, Kuliavas J, Aniukstyte L, Sileikis A, Gulla A, Šileikis A, Tumas J, Strupas K, Petrulionis M, Kvietkauskas M, Strupas K, Vito D, Rosso E, Tan JH, Zakaria AD, Mohamad IS, Meng LV, Huai TZ, Hayati F, Sellappan H, Maiyauen TK, Azman A, Chik I, Zuhdi Z, Yoong B, Soon KP, Kit KJ, Yoong BK, Koong JK, Koh PS, Ibrahim A, Abdullah NAN, Bong J, Ghani S, Zorrilla CF, Cruz MC, Valladares AM, Dominguez-Rosado I, Rosciano AEP, Sebastian GH, Melchor-Ruan J, Garcia-Herrera JS, Sandag E, Erdene S, Orgoi S, Korch M, Boutti AS, boumzebra Y, Boumzebra Y, Hourri F, Gouazar I, Belaid WA, Serji B, Tarik B, Tijani EH, Zentar A, Ghannam A, Bounaim A, Souadka A, Benkabbou A, El Ahmadi B, Amina H, Oumayma L, Amrani L, Majbar MA, Mohsine R, Elhassouni R, Echiguer S, Belkhadir Z, Nashidengo AP, Quayson F, Abebrese J, Nashidengo P, Adhikari KM, Lakhey PJ, Bhandari RS, Besselink MG, Bieze M, Augustinus S, Busch O, Pranger BK, Hoogwater FJH, Klaase JM, Meerdink M, Nijkamp MW, de Meijer VE, Koerkamp BG, van Eijck CHJ, Van Dam JL, Barbier L, Johnston P, Babor R, Chu MJJ, Oliver T, Wen D, Koea J, Koea J, Brown L, Srinivasa S, Bartlett A, Windsor J, Carr-Boyd P, Bindra V, Cross A, Connor S, Hore T, Gunawardene A, Welsh F, Mahadik M, Gordon A, Rossaak J, Adeyeye A, Enoch E, Kayode-Nissi V, Abiyere H, Alatise O, Okomayin A, Odion C, Tagar E, Sheshe AA, Muhammad AB, Garzali IU, Ajayi P, Kadri E, Jabri SA, Azri YA, Pal KMI, Siddiqui T, Waqar U, Waqar U, Chaudhry AA, Abbasy J, Khan MO, Shafqatullah S, Khokhar MI, Akbar A, Afzal A, Asghar M, Ullah S, Butt UI, Butt U, Bari H, Mohammad BN, Hameda M, Jayyab MA, Alzabadiah AHM, Adam I, Abuzaina K, Farid M, Emar MFM, Emar M, Zreqat Q, Titi R, Idkiedek SA, Amro S, Al-Qasrawi S, Almasri TA, Alnammourah WM, Kiswani G, Sinnokrot R, Harb ZA, Nafa'A H, Shtewi L, Salah AO, Joma ABA, Faraj S, Zitawi A, Dawood AJ, Saadeh I, Hmeedan A, Daraghmeh MAM, Janajreh ANA, Manassra F, Yassin LMA, Yassin R, Saleh AO, Faraj SM, Sulaiman AS, Khayyat Z, Joma ABA, Shawahni E, Salah A, khader A, Hammoudeh A, Abdulhaq A, Alawna R, Roman G, Targarona J, Grau RG, Molina R, Alegria CR, Coayla G, Enriquez JCM, Marcos JC, Hasiman AN, Teh C, Cerdeño R, David A, Sarmiento RI, Barroso RR, Alfonso C, Ang DD, Casupang A, Mamuric M, Jardinero JM, Motyka A, Flisińska M, Pierściński S, Mrowiec S, Rymarowicz J, Matyja M, Wikar T, Sierzega M, Pędziwiatr M, Richter P, Durczynski A, Kosztowny K, Ciesielski W, Wardeszkiewicz A, Szwedziak K, Wlazlak M, Grzasiak O, Szewczyk P, Hogendorf P, Wyroślak-Najs J, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Sędłak K, Solecki M, Polkowski W, Słodkowski M, Wierzchowski M, Korcz W, Nazarewski L, Kornasiewicz O, Lopes M, Martins RM, Martins R, Vigia E, Silva DS, Davide J, Pereira A, Tenreiro N, Castro T, Eisa R, Diaconescu B, Ciubotaru C, Negoi I, Negoiţă V, Radulescu RB, Bacalbaşa N, Dima S, Dumitrascu T, Spanu A, Mardare M, Ginghina O, Catrina E, Brezean I, Misca M, Vilcu M, Aldoescu S, Petrea S, Bartos A, Liviu CC, Iancu I, Barbu ST, Bodea R, Mois E, Florin G, Hajjar NA, Matei S, Zaharie F, Scripcariu V, Musina AM, Roata CE, Dimofte GM, Velenciuc N, Lunca S, Ong WL, Ong WL, Duta C, Brebu D, Braicu V, Belyaev A, Popov A, Batova A, Katysheva A, Mizgirev D, Neledova L, Duberman B, Litvin A, Pobelenko A, Kuznetsov G, Khatkov I, Tyutyunnik P, Izrailov R, Bedzhanyan A, Petrenko K, Bredikhin M, Shatverian DG, Chardarov N, Bagmet N, Lyadov V, Mudryak D, Semenenko I, Tokarev M, Kriger A, Kaldarov A, Ivanov G, Kuchin D, Torgomyan G, Zagainov V, Davydkin V, Baranov AI, Drozdov E, Anatolievna LN, Abdullaev A, Gachabayov M, Ghunaim M, Alharthi M, Aljiffry M, Bogdanovic M, Zivanovic M, Bogdanovic A, Galun D, Dugalic V, Arbutina D, Milic L, Bezmarevic M, Antic A, Radenkovic D, Ignjatovic I, Zdujic P, Kmezic S, Karamarkovic A, Arbutina D, Juloski J, Radulovic R, Radulović R, Cuk V, Jeremic L, Radojkovic M, Stojanovic M, Golijanin D, Ignjatovic MK, Protic M, Chiow A, Seng LL, Thiruchelvam N, Poh BGK, Goh BKP, Quan DCW, Koh YX, TrotovŠek B, Petrič M, Djokić M, Tomazic A, Badovinac D, Loots E, Prodehl L, Khan MU, Marumo T, Devar JWS, Omoshoro-Jones J, Khan ZA, Jugmohan B, Valcarcel AQ, García BM, Mínguez J, Marcello M, Ramia J, Compañ A, Fernandes C, Morales M, Fernández JMV, Del Mar Rico-Morales M, Liñán MÁL, Figueras J, Soliva R, Butori E, Fondevila C, Ausania F, Martín B, Rodríguez M, Sánchez-Cabús S, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Arnau ABM, Domínguez RS, Ielpo B, Pinilla FB, Castro M, Valverde DP, Santos EPG, del Carmen Manzanares Campillo M, Ruiz P, Gutierrez EC, Falgueras L, Quer MTA, Shwely FA, Fragua RL, Gonzalez-Serna DB, Valmorisco MA, Beltran-Miranda P, Busquets J, Secanella L, Pelaez N, Plaza G, Duaigües MLG, álvarez PM, Escartín A, Loinaz C, Dziakova J, de la Serna S, Pérez-Aguirre E, Justo I, Saavedra J, Gomez JC, Boñar NL, Martín-Perez E, Di Martino M, de la Hoz Rogriguez Á, Marcacuzco A, Jiménez-Romero C, de la Rúa JFR, Hinojosa-Arco LC, Suárez-Muñoz MÁ, Martinez DF, Sanchez-Bueno F, Vazquez PG, de León AM, Saiz EC, García LS, Gonzalez-Pinto I, Rodríguez-Pino JC, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Morales R, Morales-Soriano R, Rotellar F, Zozaya G, Martí-Cruchaga P, López-Sánchez J, Muñoz-Bellvis L, Cuadrado A, ortega I, Fernández R, Gómez DD, Vera V, Padillo JP, Luque JB, Millan EI, Jorba R, García-Domingot MI, Redondo C, Cantos DM, Artigues E, Pozo CDD, Llorente CP, Martínez SN, Ibáñez CB, Ibáñez JM, Andujar RL, Dorcaratto D, Forner EM, Garces-Albir M, de Heredia JB, Montes-Manrique M, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Serrablo A, Milian D, Ruiz-Quijano P, Paterna-Lopez S, Dharmapala A, Dassanayake BK, Galketiya KB, Ibrahim AM, Hamid H, Alhaboob N, Abdelmageed A, Taha SSO, Vilhav C, Wennerblom JH, Bratlie SO, Bjornsson B, Lundgren L, Sandström P, Tingstedt B, Andersson R, Andersson B, Williamsson C, Sparrelid E, Holmberg M, Ghorbani P, Gkekas I, Kuemmerli C, Bolli M, Andreou A, Wenning AS, Gloor B, Peloso A, Toso C, Oldani G, Moeckli B, Wassmer CH, Cristaudi A, Pietro MH, Majno-Hurst PE, Roesel R, Abbassi F, Tarantino I, Steffen T, Ferrari C, Schmidt J, Meier O, Weber M, Gutknecht S, Jonas JP, Clavien PA, Al-Haj A, Aljaber A, Kayali AA, Kadoura L, Nashed E, Helaly H, Kayali H, Alhashemi M, Aloulou M, Alshaghel M, Mahli N, Al-Abed O, Azizeh O, Torab SS, Alkhaleel W, Aliwy MA, Alannaz O, Ghazal A, Masri R, Douba Z, Saad AS, Abdulmonem A, Shaban M, Alhouri AN, Alhouri A, Soliman A, Houri HNA, Houri HA, Omran S, Abbas A, Chaaban M, Kudmani MAA, Chaaban MK, Alhmaidi R, Yousef A, Youssef A, Nasri M, Alkhateb H, Almjersah A, Hassan N, Moussa A, Hamdan A, Hammed A, Alloush A, Hassan BH, Issa H, Dahhan HT, Souliman M, Hammed S, Tobba TM, Hamdan A, Ayoub S, Yu MC, Yang PC, Wu CH, Bouaziz H, Rahal K, Slim S, Karim A, Baraket O, Kchaou A, Houssem A, Said MA, Mabrouk MB, Hamida KB, Ghalleb M, Mahmoud AB, Maghrebi H, Kacem MJ, Tez M, Eminesariipek N, çetiindağ Ö, Tüzüner A, Karayalçin K, Emral AC, Dikmen K, Kerem M, Bayhan H, Türkoğlu MA, Iflazoğlu N, özet A, Aday U, öfkeli Ö, Gumusoglu A, Kabuli HA, Karabulut M, Peker K, Saglam S, Rahimi FSİ, Hanefa F, Isik A, Goksoy E, Dulundu E, Atici AE, Ozocak AB, Yegen C, Dural AC, Sahbaz NA, Ulgur HS, Aydin H, Ozkan OF, Duzgun O, çelik M, Pekmezci S, çoker A, Uguz A, Unalp OV, Sert I, Ertekin S, Ozbilgin M, Aydoğan S, Tekin E, Calik B, Yesilyurt D, Atici SD, Arıkan TB, Arıkan T, Gonullu E, Dikicier E, Capoglu R, Bayhan Z, Alfurais S, Colak E, Polat S, Çiftci AB, Milburn J, Jones C, Vass D, Taylor M, Dasari BVM, Kausar A, Sultana A, Subar D, Nunes Q, Skipworth J, Nwogwugwu O, van Laarhoven S, Kourdouli A, Awan AA, Bhatti I, Latif J, Hand F, Robertson F, Holroyd D, Holroyd D, Jamieson N, Lim W, Chang D, Frampton A, Lahiri R, Chakravartty S, Siddique H, Bashir M, Mcnally S, Young A, Smith A, Pine J, Garcea G, Haqq J, Malde D, Dunne D, Burridge I, Szatmary P, Hariharan D, Kocher H, Yip V, Khalil A, Nair AM, Liova I, O'Balogun A, Rothnie A, Chikkala B, Salinas CH, Frola C, Tsakiris C, Raptis D, Chasiotis D, Sharma D, Jessa F, Soggiu F, Fusai G, Kostakis I, Kathirvel M, Elnagar M, Dimitrokallis N, Iype S, Pericleous S, Mohamed A, Val ARD, Tinguely P, Likos-Corbett M, Afzal I, Bhogal R, Patel K, Siriwardena AK, de' Liguori Carino N, Sheen PA, Gareb F, Ammar K, Thakkar R, Pandanaboyana S, Leeds J, Gomez D, Gregory G, Ceresa C, Abbas H, Lazzereschi L, Reddy S, Gordon-Weeks A, Aroori S, Russell T, Roberts K, Chatzizacharias N, Sutcliffe R, Al-Sarireh B, Shingler G, Mortimer M, Skoryi D, Ilin I, Pisetska M, Cheverdiuk D, Kostyantyn K, Kopchak K, Kvasivka O, Valeriia S, Sumarokova V, Kryzhevskyi V, Sikachov S, Khomiak A, Malik A, Khomiak I, Bilyak A, Chooklin S, Chuklin S, Mikheiev I, Shylenko O, Klymenko A, Patel S, Cunningham S, Callery M, Kent T, Raut C, Wang J, Fairweather M, Sulciner M, Hirji S, Clancy T, Nebbia M, Qadan M, Musser A, Hogg M, Rodriquez J, Hamner J, Hennessy L, Dinerman A, Gupta A, Kimbrough C, Thompson R, Zeh HJ, Radi I, Polanco PM, Moris D, Lidsky ME, Lee D, Piper J, Gnerlich J, Tuvin D, Sticca R, Ganai S, Gusani N, Krinock D, Giorgakis E, Hardgrave H, Spencer-Cole RT, Klutts G, Hardgrave H, Nigh J, Nigh J, Andrade JCB, Mavros M, Osborn T, Ferrone C, O'Connor V, Boone B, Harris B, Schmidt C, Schrope B, Chabot J, Kluger M, Lasso ET, Nevler A, Yeo C, Ponzini F, Lavu H, Lamm R, Bowne W, Kyser N, Galanopoulos C, Abbasi A, Park J, Sham J, Dickerson L, Pillarisetty V, Sucandy I, Ross S, Winslow E, Hawksworth J, Radkani P, Fishbein T, Munoz AS, Lindberg J, Martins PN, Al-saban RAM, Al-Saban R, Al-Kubati W, Ghallab AAA, Alsanany GM, Almarashi H, Al-Samawi H, Al-Asadi MAMM, Alsayadi R, Hail S, Shream S, Bajjah HM, Al-Ameri S, Bajjah H, Al-Ameri SAAS, Al-Dowsh NA, AlDowsh NA, Al-Khawlani Q, Murshed YAA, Al-Shehari M, Jahaf AAD, Al-sharabi EAE, Aldumaini H, Alattas Z, Almassaudi A, Bajjah HMAH, Albakry R, Al-Naggar H, Shream SAA, Affary AA, Al-Markiz E, Al-Eryani F, Farhat H, Qadasi QA, Alwafy K, Abdualqader MYM, Ali RAAY, Albar A, Bleem HA, Galeb KSA, Ghushaim M, Sabbar M, Esmail M, Ali RAY, Salem RHM, Salem R, Saif W, Al-Faiq S, Alsharabi E, Hameed ATA, Almekhlafi T, Omairan A, Almarkiz E, Abduljawad H, Mansaleh O, Al-Melhani W, Abdualqader M, Al-Abdi R, Alwan HM, Mbanje C, Chihaka O. Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad330. [PMID: 38743040 PMCID: PMC10771125 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery remains associated with high morbidity rates. Although postoperative mortality appears to have improved with specialization, the outcomes reported in the literature reflect the activity of highly specialized centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following pancreatic surgery worldwide. METHODS This was an international, prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional snapshot study of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic operations worldwide in a 3-month interval in 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality within 90 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore relationships with Human Development Index (HDI) and other parameters. RESULTS A total of 4223 patients from 67 countries were analysed. A complication of any severity was detected in 68.7 per cent of patients (2901 of 4223). Major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa) were 24, 18, and 27 per cent, and mortality rates were 10, 5, and 5 per cent in low-to-middle-, high-, and very high-HDI countries respectively. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate was 5.4 per cent (229 of 4223) overall, but was significantly higher in the low-to-middle-HDI group (adjusted OR 2.88, 95 per cent c.i. 1.80 to 4.48). The overall failure-to-rescue rate was 21 per cent; however, it was 41 per cent in low-to-middle- compared with 19 per cent in very high-HDI countries. CONCLUSION Excess mortality in low-to-middle-HDI countries could be attributable to failure to rescue of patients from severe complications. The authors call for a collaborative response from international and regional associations of pancreatic surgeons to address management related to death from postoperative complications to tackle the global disparities in the outcomes of pancreatic surgery (NCT04652271; ISRCTN95140761).
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah OJ, Singh M. Developments in pancreatic cancer surgery. Updates Surg 2024; 76:17-22. [PMID: 37943494 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01692-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer surgery, with one of the worst prognoses in oncology, is a challenge to the surgical community. Centralization of pancreatic surgery has led to the foundation of high-volume centers, thereby greatly facilitating the successful performance of more radical approaches. This review spotlights on recent advances in surgical approaches to pancreatic cancer and the risks and benefits of vascular reconstruction to improve resectability. Surgery being the only modality to achieve cure, multivisceral and vascular resections are being incorporated to improve dismal operability rates of < 10%. Great leaps have been made in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, as targeted and specific chemotherapeutic agents are being continually added. The concept of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic tumors and the use of neoadjuvant chemorad has extended the indications of oncological resection in such tumors. Venous resections are being routinely performed so as to facilitate en bloc removal of tumors, while arterial resections, owing to the increased morbidity and mortality, are offered to highly selective cases. New techniques like the triangle operation and periarterial divestment have opened new viable surgical options. Although laparoscopic approach is time consuming, it offers reduced operative blood loss and a shortened hospital stay at specialized centers. Robotic surgery may produce better results in patients needing vascular resection and reconstruction, but the expenses involved and limited availability are major deterrents. Advanced techniques of surgical resection and vessel reconstruction provide a repository for curative-intent surgery in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar J Shah
- GI and HPB Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
- , 19, Kral-Sangri, Brein, Nishat, Srinagar, Kashmir (JK), 190010, India.
| | - Manmohan Singh
- GI and HPB Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
- GI and HPB Surgery, GMC Anantnag, Anantnag, Jammu & Kashmir, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stoop TF, Bergquist E, Theijse RT, Hempel S, van Dieren S, Sparrelid E, Distler M, Hackert T, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M, Ghorbani P. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Total Pancreatectomy as an Alternative to Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at High Risk for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is it a Justifiable Indication? Ann Surg 2023; 278:e702-e711. [PMID: 37161977 PMCID: PMC10481933 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine the potential benefit of total pancreatectomy (TP) as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA TP is mentioned as an alternative to PD in patients at high risk for POPF, but a systematic review is lacking. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analyses using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published up to October 2022, comparing elective single-stage TP for any indication versus PD in patients at high risk for POPF. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) on the short-term and quality of life. RESULTS After screening 1212 unique records, five studies with 707 patients (334 TP and 373 high-risk PD) met the eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies. The 90-day mortality after TP and PD did not differ (6.3% vs. 6.2%; RR=1.04 [95%CI 0.56-1.93]). Major morbidity rate was lower after TP compared to PD (26.7% vs. 38.3%; RR=0.65 [95%CI 0.48-0.89]), but no significance was seen in matched/randomized studies (29.0% vs. 36.9%; RR = 0.73 [95%CI 0.48-1.10]). Two studies investigated quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) at a median of 30-52 months, demonstrating comparable global health status after TP and PD (77% [±15] vs. 76% [±20]; P =0.857). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis found no reduction in short-term mortality and major morbidity after TP as compared to PD in patients at high risk for POPF. However, if TP is used as a bail-out procedure, the comparable long-term quality of life is reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Erik Bergquist
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rutger T. Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Hempel
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liang Y, Cui J, Ding F, Zou Y, Guo H, Man Q, Chang S, Gao S, Hao J. A new staging system for postoperative prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. iScience 2023; 26:107589. [PMID: 37664604 PMCID: PMC10469961 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The current TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has revised the definitions of T and N categories as well as stage groups. However, studies validating these modifications have yielded inconsistent results. The existing TNM staging system in prognostic prediction remains unsatisfactory. The prognosis of PDAC is closely associated with pathological and biological factors. Herein, we propose a new staging system incorporating distant metastasis, postoperative serum levels of CA19-9 and CEA, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular involvement, and perineural invasion to enhance the accuracy of prognosis assessment. The proposed staging system exhibited a strong correlation with both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, effectively stratifying survival into five distinct tiers. Additionally, it had favorable discrimination and calibration. Thus, the proposed staging system demonstrates superior prognostic performance compared to the TNM staging system, and can serve as a valuable complementary tool to address the limitations of TNM staging in prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexiang Liang
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Center of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Jingli Cui
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
- Department of General Surgery, Weifang People’s Hospital, Weifang 261044, China
| | - Fanghui Ding
- Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730013, China
| | - Yiping Zou
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
| | - Hanhan Guo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Center of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570102, China
| | - Quan Man
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
| | - Shaofei Chang
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Pancreatic Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
| | - Jihui Hao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center For Cancer, Tianjin 30060, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ren L, Jäger C, Schorn S, Pergolini I, Göß R, Safak O, Kießler M, Martignoni ME, Novotny AR, Friess H, Ceyhan GO, Demir IE. Arterial Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Current Standing in a High-Volume Center. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e302. [PMID: 37746627 PMCID: PMC10513225 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Arterial resection (AR) during pancreatectomy for curative R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a controversial procedure with high morbidity. Objective To investigate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of pancreatectomy combined with AR at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed our experience in PDAC patients, who underwent pancreatic resection with AR and/or venous resection (VR) between 2007 and 2021. Results In total 259 PDAC patients with borderline resectable (n = 138) or locally advanced (n = 121) PDAC underwent vascular resection during tumor resection. From these, 23 patients had AR (n = 4 due to intraoperative injury, n = 19 due to suspected arterial infiltration). However, 12 out of 23 patients (52.2%) underwent simultaneous VR including 1 case with intraoperative arterial injury. In comparison, 11 patients (47.8%) underwent AR only including 3 intraoperative arterial injury patients. Although the operation time and bleeding rate of patients with AR were respectively longer and higher than in VR, no significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between VR and AR (P = 0.11). The final histopathological findings of PDAC patients were similar, including M stage, regional lymph node metastases, and R0 margin resection. The mortality of the entire cohort was 6.2% (16/259), with a tendency to increase mortality in the AR cohort, yet without statistical significance (VR: 5% vs AR: 21.1%; P = 0.05). Although 19 (82.6%) patients had PDAC in the final histopathology, only 6 were confirmed to have infiltrated arteria. The microscopic distribution of PDAC in these infiltrated arterial walls on hematoxylin-eosin staining was classified into 3 patterns. Strikingly, the perivascular nerves frequently exhibited perineural invasion. Conclusions AR can be performed in high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery with an acceptable morbidity, which is comparable to that of VR. However, the likelihood of arterial infiltration seems to be rather overestimated, and as such, AR might be avoidable or replaced by less invasive techniques such as divestment during PDAC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Ren
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- Department of General Surgery (Gastrointestinal Surgery), The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- CRC 1321 Modelling and Targeting Pancreatic Cancer, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Jäger
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schorn
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Ilaria Pergolini
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Göß
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Okan Safak
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Kießler
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc E. Martignoni
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander R. Novotny
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Güralp O. Ceyhan
- Department of General Surgery, HPB-Unit, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ihsan Ekin Demir
- From the Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- CRC 1321 Modelling and Targeting Pancreatic Cancer, Munich, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, HPB-Unit, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Else Kröner Clinician Scientist Professor for Translational Pancreatic Surgery, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oba A, Del Chiaro M, Fujii T, Okano K, Stoop TF, Wu YHA, Maekawa A, Yoshida Y, Hashimoto D, Sugawara T, Inoue Y, Tanabe M, Sho M, Sasaki T, Takahashi Y, Matsumoto I, Sasahira N, Nagakawa Y, Satoi S, Schulick RD, Yoon YS, He J, Jang JY, Wolfgang CL, Hackert T, Besselink MG, Takaori K, Takeyama Y. "Conversion surgery" for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the study group at the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022. Pancreatology 2023; 23:712-720. [PMID: 37336669 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), which progresses locally and surrounds major vessels, has historically been deemed unresectable. Surgery alone failed to provide curative resection and improve overall survival. With the advancements in treatment, reports have shown favorable results in LAPC after undergoing successful chemotherapy therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection, so-called "conversion surgery", at experienced high-volume centers. However, recognizing significant regional and institutional disparities in the management of LAPC, an international consensus meeting on conversion surgery for LAPC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. During the meeting, presenters reported the current best multidisciplinary practices for LAPC, including preoperative modalities, best systemic treatment regimens and durations, procedures of conversion surgery with or without vascular resections, biomarkers, and genetic studies. It was unanimously agreed among the experts in this meeting that "cancer biology is surpassing locoregional anatomical resectability" in the era of effective multiagent treatment. The biology of pancreatic cancer has yet to be further elucidated, and we believe it is essential to improve the treatment outcomes of LAPC patients through continued efforts from each institution and more international collaboration. This article summarizes the agreement during the discussion amongst the experts in the meeting. We hope that this will serve as a foundation for future international collaboration and recommendations for future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Okano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University School of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Y H Andrew Wu
- Department Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aya Maekawa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yoshida
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jin He
- Department Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany; Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kinny-Köster B, Habib JR, van Oosten F, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, He J, Wolfgang CL. Conduits in Vascular Pancreatic Surgery: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Operative Techniques, and Graft Performance. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e94-e104. [PMID: 35838419 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We analyze successes and failures of pushing the boundaries in vascular pancreatic surgery to establish safety of conduit reconstructions. BACKGROUND Improved systemic control from chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is increasing the demand for surgical solutions of extensive local vessel involvement, but conduit-specific data are scarce. METHODS We identified 63 implanted conduits (41% autologous vessels, 37% allografts, 18% PTFE) in 56 pancreatic resections of highly selected cancer patients between October 2013 and July 2020 from our prospectively maintained database. Assessed parameters were survival, perioperative complications, operative techniques (anatomic and extra-anatomic routes), and conduit patency. RESULTS For vascular reconstruction, 25 arterial and 38 venous conduits were utilized during 39 pancreatoduodenectomies, 14 distal pancreatectomies, and 3 total pancreatectomies. The median postoperative survival was 2 years. A Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa complication was apparent in 50% of the patients with a median Comprehensive Complication Index of 29.6. The 90-day mortality in this highly selected cohort was 9%. Causes of mortality were conduit related in 3 patients, late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage in 1 patient, and early liver metastasis in 1 patient. Image-based patency rates of conduits were 66% and 45% at postoperative days 30 and 90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our perioperative mortality of vascular pancreatic surgery with conduits in the arterial or venous system is 9%. Reconstructions are technically feasible with different anatomic and extra-anatomic strategies, while identifying predictors of early conduit occlusion remains challenging. Optimizing reconstructed arterial and venous hemodynamics in the context of pancreatic malignancy will enable long-term survival in more patients responsive to chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Seelen LWF, Floortje van Oosten A, Brada LJH, Groot VP, Daamen LA, Walma MS, van der Lek BF, Liem MSL, Patijn GA, Stommel MWJ, van Dam RM, Koerkamp BG, Busch OR, de Hingh IHJT, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG, Burkhart RA, Borel Rinkes IHM, Wolfgang CL, Molenaar IQ, He J, van Santvoort HC. Early Recurrence After Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Therapy: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:118-126. [PMID: 35950757 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish an evidence-based cutoff and predictors for early recurrence in patients with resected locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). BACKGROUND It is unclear how many and which patients develop early recurrence after LAPC resection. Surgery in these patients is probably of little benefit. METHODS We analyzed all consecutive patients undergoing resection of LAPC after induction chemotherapy who were included in prospective databases in The Netherlands (2015-2019) and the Johns Hopkins Hospital (2016-2018). The optimal definition for "early recurrence" was determined by the post-recurrence survival (PRS). Patients were compared for overall survival (OS). Predictors for early recurrence were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 168 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence was observed in 118 patients (70.2%). The optimal cutoff for recurrence-free survival to differentiate between early (n=52) and late recurrence (n=66) was 6 months ( P <0.001). OS was 8.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-9.6] in the early recurrence group (n=52) versus 31.1 months (95% CI: 25.7-36.4) in the late/no recurrence group (n=116) ( P <0.001). A preoperative predictor for early recurrence was postinduction therapy carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9≥100 U/mL [odds ratio (OR)=4.15, 95% CI: 1.75-9.84, P =0.001]. Postoperative predictors were poor tumor differentiation (OR=4.67, 95% CI: 1.83-11.90, P =0.001) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=6.04, 95% CI: 2.43-16.55, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Early recurrence was observed in one third of patients after LAPC resection and was associated with poor survival. Patients with post-induction therapy CA 19-9 ≥100 U/mL, poor tumor differentiation and no adjuvant therapy were especially at risk. This information is valuable for patient counseling before and after resection of LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan F van der Lek
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Izaak Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fogliati A, Fiorentini G, Alva-Ruiz R, Abdelrahman AM, Zironda A, Lynch IT, Smoot RL, Starlinger PP, Cleary SP, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ. Technical Outcomes of Porto-Mesenteric Venous Reconstruction in Pancreatic Resection Using Autologous Left Renal Vein Graft as Conduit. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:58-67. [PMID: 37158471 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) resection and reconstruction is sometimes required during pancreatic tumor resection. In patients requiring segmental venous resection with interposition grafting, the left renal vein (LRV) is an accessible autologous solution. However, long-term patency outcomes of the LRV as an interposition conduit in this setting have not been analyzed. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with PV-SMV reconstruction using LRV between 2002 and 2022. The primary outcome was PV-SMV patency at last follow-up, assessed with postoperative CT scans and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods that account for variation in follow-up duration. Development of any postoperative acute kidney injury within 7 days of surgery and morbidity were secondary outcomes. RESULTS The study cohort includes 65 patients who underwent LRV harvest; 60 (92%) ultimately underwent successful reconstruction with harvested LRV graft. Kaplan-Meier 2-year estimated patency rate of the LRV graft was 88%, with no cases of complete occlusion. Six (10%) patients experienced graft stenosis. Nine of 61 (15%) patients experienced grade II or III acute kidney injury, 6 of 9 returning to normal renal function before discharge. No difference in median serum creatinine was observed at baseline, 6 and 12 months from surgery. LRV remnant thrombosis was seen in 7 of 65 (11%) patients. Only 3 of 61 (5%) patients had persistent acute kidney injury caused by complications unrelated to LRV harvesting. CONCLUSIONS Autologous LRV graft was a reliable conduit for segmental PV-SMV reconstruction, resulting in a high patency rate and marginal impact on renal function. LRV harvest is a safe and potentially ideal surgical option for PV-SMV reconstruction in pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fogliati
- From the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miao Y, Cai B, Lu Z. Technical options in surgery for artery-involving pancreatic cancer: Invasion depth matters. Surg Open Sci 2023; 12:55-61. [PMID: 36936450 PMCID: PMC10020102 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The artery involvement explains the majority of primary unresectability of non-metastatic pancreatic cancer patients and both arterial resection and artery-sparing dissection techniques are utilized in curative-intent pancreatectomies for artery-involving pancreatic cancer (ai-PC) patients. Methods This narrative review summarized the history of resectability evaluation for ai-PC and attempted to interpret its current pitfalls that led to the divergence of resectability prediction and surgical exploration, with a focus on the rationale and the surgical outcomes of the sub-adventitial divestment technique. Results The circumferential involvement of artery by tumor currently defined the resectability of ai-PC but insufficient to preclude laparotomy with curative intent. The reasons behind could be: 1. The radiographic involvement of tumor to arterial circumference was not necessarily resulted in histopathological artery wall invasion; 2. the developed surgical techniques facilitated radical resection, better perioperative safety as well as oncological benefit. The feasibility of periadventitial dissection, sub-adventitial divestment and other artery-sparing techniques for ai-PC depended on the tumor invasion depth to the artery, i.e., whether the external elastic lamina (EEL) was invaded demonstrating a hallmark plane for sub-adventitial dissections. These techniques were reported to be complicated with preferable surgical outcomes comparing to arterial resection combined pancreatectomies, while the arterial resection combined pancreatectomies were considered performed in patients with more advanced disease. Conclusions Adequate preoperative imaging modalities with which to evaluate the tumor invasion depth to the artery are to be developed. Survival benefits after these techniques remain to be proven, with more and higher-level clinical evidence needed. Key message The current resectability evaluation criteria, which were based on radiographic circumferential involvement of the artery by tumor, was insufficient to preclude curative-intent pancreatectomies for artery-involving pancreatic cancer patients. With oncological benefit to be further proven, periarterial dissection and arterial resection have different but overlapping indications, and predicting the tumor invasion depth in major arteries was critical for surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
- Pancreas Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
- Corresponding author at: Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China.
| | - Baobao Cai
- Pancreas Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| | - Zipeng Lu
- Pancreas Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Santibañes M, Pekolj J, Sanchez Claria R, de Santibañes E, Mazza OM. Technical Implications for Surgical Resection in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051509. [PMID: 36900300 PMCID: PMC10000506 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a global health challenge and is predicted to soon become the second leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. Currently, surgical resection in combination with systemic chemotherapy offers the only chance of cure or long-term survival. However, only 20% of cases are diagnosed with anatomically resectable disease. Neoadjuvant treatment followed by highly complex surgical procedures has been studied over the last decade with promising short- and long-term results in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LAPC). In recent years, a wide variety of complex surgical techniques that involve extended pancreatectomies, including portomesenteric venous resection, arterial resection, or multi-organ resection, have emerged to optimize local control of the disease and improve postoperative outcomes. Although there are multiple surgical techniques described in the literature to improve outcomes in LAPC, the comprehensive view of these strategies remains underdeveloped. We aim to describe the preoperative surgical planning as well different surgical resections strategies in LAPC after neoadjuvant treatment in an integrated way for selected patients with no other potentially curative option other than surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martín de Santibañes
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +54-11-4981-4501
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| | - Oscar Maria Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kung H, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e216. [PMID: 36814688 PMCID: PMC9939368 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng‐Chung Kung
- Krieger School of Arts and SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jun Yu
- Departments of Medicine and OncologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Addeo P, Averous G, de Mathelin P, Faitot F, Cusumano C, Paul C, Dufour P, Bachellier P. Pancreatectomy After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy: Identifying Factors Predicting Long-Term Survival. World J Surg 2023; 47:1253-1262. [PMID: 36670291 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06910-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pancreatectomy with vascular resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS Clinical data from patients who underwent pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively reviewed. Cox analyses were used to identify factors prognostic of overall survival (OS). RESULTS FOLFIRINOX protocol was administered pre-operatively with a median number of nine cycles (range 2-18) in 98 patients. Types of resections included pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 53), total pancreatectomy (n = 17), and distal spleno-pancreatectomy (n = 28). Venous resection and arterial resections were performed in 85 (86.7%) and 64 patients (65.3%), respectively. The overall 90-day mortality and morbidity rates were 6.1% (n = 6) and 47% (n = 47), respectively. The median OS was 31.08 months after surgery. OS rates at one, three, five, and 10 years were 82%, 47%, 28%, and 21%, respectively. According to the type of vascular resection, median OS and 5-year survival rates were exclusive venous resection (31.08 months; 23%) and arterial resections (24.7 months; 27%). Multivariate Cox analysis found lymph node involvement, venous invasion, and total pancreatectomy as independent prognostic factors for OS. According to the presence of 0 or 1-3 risk factors, 5-year survival (85% vs 16%) and median overall survival rates (not reached versus 24.7 months, respectively) were statistically significantly different (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS A multimodal treatment, including neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX combined with pancreatectomy with venous and arterial resection, achieves long term survival rates in patients with locally advanced disease. Surgery, in experienced centers, should be integrated into the treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Gerlinde Averous
- Department of Pathology, University of Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre de Mathelin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - François Faitot
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Caterina Cusumano
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Chloe Paul
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Dufour
- Department of Oncology, University of Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques Et de La Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li X, Liu X, Lu N, Chen Y, Zhang X, Guo C, Xiao W, Xue X, Sun K, Wang M, Gao S, Shen Y, Zhang M, Wu J, Que R, Yu J, Bai X, Liang T. Normalization of tumor markers and a clear resection margin affect progression-free survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who have undergone conversion surgery. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:49. [PMID: 36641427 PMCID: PMC9840266 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the advent of intensive combination regimens, an increasing number of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) have regained the opportunity for surgery. We investigated the clinical benefits and prognostic factors of conversion surgery (CS) in UPC patients. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled patients with UPC who had received CS following first-line systemic treatment in our center between 2014 to 2022. Treatment response, safety of the surgical procedure and clinicopathological data were collected. We analyzed the prognostic factors for postoperative survival among UPC patients who had CS. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients with UPC were enrolled (53 with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and 14 with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC)). The duration of preoperative systemic treatment was 4.17 months for LAPC patients and 6.52 months for MPC patients. All patients experienced a partial response (PR) or had stable disease (SD) preoperatively according to imaging. Tumor resection was unsuccessful in four patients and, finally, R0 resection was obtained in 81% of cases. Downstaging was determined pathologically in 87% of cases; four patients achieved a complete pathological response. Median postoperative-progression-free survival (PO-PFS) was 9.77 months and postoperative overall survival (PO-OS) was 31.2 months. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the resection margin and postoperative changes in levels of tumor markers were significant prognostic factors for PO-PFS. No factors were associated significantly with PO-OS according to multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS CS is a promising strategy for improving the prognosis of UPC patients. The resection margin and postoperative change in levels of tumor markers are the most important prognostic factors for prolonged PFS. Multidisciplinary treatment in high-volume centers is strongly recommended. Prospective studies must be undertaken to resolve the various problems regarding optimal regimens, the duration of treatment, and detailed criteria for CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Li
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinyuan Liu
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Na Lu
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiwen Chen
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chengxiang Guo
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenbo Xiao
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xing Xue
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ke Sun
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Meng Wang
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shunliang Gao
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yan Shen
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Zhang
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian Wu
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Risheng Que
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Yu
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China ,grid.452661.20000 0004 1803 6319Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China ,grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XZhejiang University Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ljubicic L, Petrovic I, Crkvenac Gregorek A, Silovski H. Portomesenteric Reconstruction during Whipple Procedure Using Autologous Left Renal Vein Patch Graft in a Patient with a Gastric Cancer Recurrence. Case Rep Surg 2023; 2023:2717041. [PMID: 37151817 PMCID: PMC10159741 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2717041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The case of vascular reconstruction of the superior mesenteric and portal vein confluence using a left renal vein (LRV) graft has been researched in this paper. The patient was a 66-year-old female who presented with features of biliary obstruction. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed bile duct dilatation and a common bile duct tumor mass. Four years ago, she underwent stomach resection with subsequent Billroth II gastrojejunostomy due to gastric cancer. After surgical resection, on histopathological and immunohistochemistry examination, a recurrence of previously resected poorly cohesive gastric cancer was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidija Ljubicic
- Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Igor Petrovic
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Hrvoje Silovski
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Piper M, Ross RB, Hu J, Watanabe S, Knitz M, Mehrotra S, Shulick R, Chiaro MD, Karam SD. Vasculitis, CA19-9, and Perineural Invasion Differentially Predict Response and Surgical Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(22)03692-6. [PMID: 36599398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Curative intent treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) relies on surgical resection. Modern treatment protocols focus on optimizing neoadjuvant therapy to increase resectability and improve oncologic outcomes. To elucidate differences in outcomes, we investigated the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), either with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and vascular inflammation, surgical outcomes, and the resultant transcriptomic changes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical data were collected from patients with borderline resectable PDAC (clinical T3-T4N0-1) who underwent NAC or NAC-SBRT followed by curative intent resection between 2014 and 2019. Vascular structures on surgical specimens were histologically evaluated for vasculitis. RNA sequencing was used to evaluate differential gene expression and to generate enrichment maps. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between patient characteristics and oncological outcome. RESULTS In total, 46 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 12 NAC, n = 34 NAC-SBRT) with a median follow-up of 20.1 months. All patients underwent curative resection, with 91.3% achieving R0. There was no significant difference in patterns of failure, overall survival, or progression-free survival between NAC and NAC-SBRT groups. Patients with vasculitis had a lower median overall survival compared with those without (14.5 vs 28.3 months; hazard ratio, 12.96; 95% confidence interval, 3.55-47.28; P < .001). There was no significant correlation between inflammation and surgical complications or pathologic response. Neoadjuvant therapy did not have a significant effect on development of vasculitis (odds radio, 1.64 for NAC-SBRT; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-8.43; P = .52). Predictors of poor survival included perineural invasion and high baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (>191 U/mL). Patients with robust CA19-9 (>20% decrease) responses to neoadjuvant therapy had enrichment in immune response, chemotaxis, and cytotoxic T-cell and natural killer-cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Vasculitis predicts for poor survival outcomes in patients with PDAC; NAC-SBRT did not increase the rate of vasculitis compared with NAC. Perineural invasion and CA19-9 remain strong prognosticators. Understanding and optimizing immune interactions remain a crucial hurdle in achieving response in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles Piper
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard Blake Ross
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Junxiao Hu
- Departments of Biostatistics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Shuichi Watanabe
- Departments of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael Knitz
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sanjana Mehrotra
- Departments of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard Shulick
- Departments of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Departments of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sana D Karam
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Komarov RN, Egorov AV, Osminin SV, Bilyalov IR, Zhemerikin GA, Ryabov KY, Novikov SS. [The first experience of small intestinal autotransplantation for advanced digestive cancer]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:34-42. [PMID: 38088839 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202312134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Usually, gastrointestinal tumors (GIT) invading great vessels are acknowledged to be irresectable. Along with that, we can expect positive oncological results only when there is combination treatment with radical surgery (R0 resection). In this article we share the first experience of small intestinal autotransplantation as a method of radical surgery in locally advanced GIT. We conducted the analysis of outcomes of three patients (with pancreas cancer (n=2) and neuroendocrine tumor of caecum (n=1), with neoplastic process involving to superior mesenteric artery and vein. We analyzed intraoperative aspects and algorithm of small intestinal autotransplantation. Long-term outcomes with 1.5-13 months of observing time are presented. On the basis of conducted analysis the authors suggest the possibility of small intestinal autotransplantation in referral centers with strict personalized approach and multidisciplinary surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R N Komarov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Egorov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - S V Osminin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - I R Bilyalov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - G A Zhemerikin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - K Yu Ryabov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - S S Novikov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Bou-Samra P, Alsaad R, Sereni E, Javed AA, Ding D, Cameron JL, Lafaro KJ, Burns WR, He J, Yu J, Wolfgang CL, Burkhart RA. Surgical Decision-Making in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Modeling Prognosis Following Pancreatectomy in the Era of Induction and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2023; 277:151-158. [PMID: 33843794 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a predictive model of oncologic outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing resection after neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy use. BACKGROUND Early recurrence following surgical resection for PDAC is common. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection may increase the likelihood of long-term systemic disease control. Accurately characterizing an individual's likely oncologic outcome in the perioperative setting remains challenging. METHODS Data from patients with PDAC who received chemotherapy prior to pancreatectomy at a single high-volume institution between 2007 and 2018 were captured in a prospectively collected database. Core clinicopathologic data were reviewed for accuracy and survival data were abstracted from the electronic medical record and national databases. Cox-proportional regressions were used to model outcomes and develop an interactive prognostic tool for clinical decision-making. RESULTS A total of 581 patients were included with a median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 29.5 (26.5-32.5) and 16.6 (15.8-17.5) months, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrates OS and RFS were associated with type of chemotherapeutic used andthe number of chemotherapy cycles received preoperatively. Additional factors contributing to survival models included: tumor grade, histopathologic response to therapy, nodal status, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. The models were validated using an iterative bootstrap method and with randomized cohort splitting. The models were well calibrated with concordance indices of 0.68 and 0.65 for the final OS and RFS models, respectively. CONCLUSION We developed an intuitive and dynamic decision-making tool that can be useful in estimating OS, RFS, and location-specific disease recurrence rates. This prognostic tool may add value to patient care in discussing the benefits associated with surgical resection for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Patrick Bou-Samra
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ranim Alsaad
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Elisabetta Sereni
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alva-Ruiz R, Abdelrahman AM, Starlinger PP, Yonkus JA, Moravec DN, Busch JJ, Fleming CJ, Andrews JC, Mendes BC, Colglazier JJ, Smoot RL, Cleary SP, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ. Patency rates of hepatic arterial resection and revascularization in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1957-1966. [PMID: 35780039 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arterial resection (AR) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increasingly considered at specialized centers. We aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) occlusion after revascularization. METHODS We included patients undergoing HA resection with interposition graft (IG) or primary end-to-end anastomoses (EE). Complete arterial occlusion (CAO) was defined as "early" (EO) or "late" (LO) before/after 90 days respectively. Kaplan-Meier and change-point analysis for CAO was performed. RESULTS HA resection was performed in 108 patients, IG in 61% (66/108) and EE in 39% (42/108). An equal proportion (50%) underwent HA resection alone or in combination with celiac and/or superior mesenteric artery. CAO was identified in 18% of patients (19/108) with arterial IG least likely to occlude (p=0.019). Hepatic complications occurred in 42% (45/108) and correlated with CAO, symptomatic patients, venous resection, and postoperative portal venous patency. CAO-related operative mortality was 4.6% and significantly higher in EO vs LO (p = 0.046). Median CAO occlusion was 126 days. With change-point analysis, CAO was minimal beyond postoperative day 158. CONCLUSION CAO can occur in up to 18% of patients and the first 5-month post-operative period is critical for surveillance. LO is associated with better outcomes compared to EO unless there is inadequate portal venous inflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Alva-Ruiz
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amro M Abdelrahman
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Patrick P Starlinger
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer A Yonkus
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David N Moravec
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joel J Busch
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chad J Fleming
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James C Andrews
- Division of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN, USA
| | - Jill J Colglazier
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David M Nagorney
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael L Kendrick
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stoop TF, Mackay TM, Brada LJH, van der Harst E, Daams F, Land FRV‘, Kazemier G, Patijn GA, van Santvoort HC, de Hingh IH, Bosscha K, Seelen LWF, Nijkamp MW, Stommel MWJ, Liem MSL, Busch OR, Coene PPLO, van Dam RM, de Wilde RF, Mieog JSD, Quintus Molenaar I, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ, de Meijer VE, Olij B, den Dulk M, Ramaekers M, Bonsing BA, Michiels N, Koerkamp BG, Festen S, Wit F, Lips DJ, Draaisma W, Manusama E, te Riele W. Pancreatectomy with arterial resection for periampullary cancer: outcomes after planned or unplanned events in a nationwide, multicentre cohort. Br J Surg 2022; 110:638-642. [PMID: 36308339 PMCID: PMC10364546 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Tara M Mackay
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein , Utrecht & Nieuwegein , The Netherlands
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Freek R van ‘t Land
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics , Zwolle , The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein , Utrecht & Nieuwegein , The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , ‘s Hertogenbosch , The Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein , Utrecht & Nieuwegein , The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W. Nijkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede , The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen , Aachen , Germany
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein , Utrecht & Nieuwegein , The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oncologic Benefits of Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Upfront Surgery in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184360. [PMID: 36139520 PMCID: PMC9497278 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has been primarily indicated for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in the last decade. This study is the updated meta-analysis for only patients with BRPC including recent NAT regimens such as FOLFIRINOX. The OS, R0 resection rate, and node-negativity rate was improved in NAT group compared with upfront surgery. Providing high-quality evidence is important to standardize the treatment protocol and help physicians decide the appropriate pancreatic cancer treatment. Abstract Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by surgery is the primary treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, there is limited high-level evidence supporting the efficacy of NAT in BRPC. PubMed was searched to identify studies that compared the survival between BRPC patients who underwent NAT and those who underwent upfront surgery (UFS). The overall survival (OS) was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. A total of 1204 publications were identified, and 19 publications with 21 data sets (2906 patients; NAT, 1516; UFS, 1390) were analyzed. Two randomized controlled trials and two prospective studies were included. Thirteen studies performed an ITT analysis, while six presented the data of resected patients. The NAT group had significantly better OS than the UFS group in the ITT analyses (HR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.76) and resected patients (HR: 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60–0.78). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 and FOLFIRINOX improved the survival outcomes. Among the resected patients, the R0 resection and node-negativity rates were significantly higher in the NAT group. NAT improved the OS, R0 resection rate, and node-negativity rate compared with UFS. Standardizing treatment regimens based on high-quality evidence is fundamental for developing an optimal protocol.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tsiotos GG, Ballian N, Milas F, Peraki E, Kostopanagiotou G, Tsigaridas K. Aorta to proper hepatic artery bypass with total pancreatectomy and celiac axis resection (TP-CAR) in a patient with locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022; 98:107544. [PMID: 36055170 PMCID: PMC9482927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Total pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection (TP-CAR) and interposition graft placement between the aorta and the proper hepatic artery is a technically demanding, very uncommonly performed operation, even in high-volume pancreatic centers. Presentation of case We present, in clinical and technical detail, a patient with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body and neck involving the celiac and common hepatic arteries and portal vein, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation with very good response, followed by TP-CAR and aorto-proper hepatic artery bypass using saphenous vein graft. The patient had an uneventful intraoperative and postoperative course, short hospital stay, and histology consistent with a curative resection. Discussion TP-CAR with common hepatic artery resection and proper hepatic artery reconstruction in patients with locally advanced pancreatic body cancer after appropriate neoadjuvant therapy can be performed safely and be potentially curative in centers with an established track record in advanced pancreatic surgery involving major peripancreatic vessels. Conclusion TP-CAR with proper hepatic artery reconstruction is a rare but potentially curative operation for selected patients with otherwise unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. TP-CAR and aorto-PHA bypass graft: A very rare, technically demanding operation with significant morbidity & mortality This operation may provide curative (R0) resection of an otherwise unresectable cancer Our patient had optimal perioperative outcome and excellent histology result To the best of our knowledge this is the first TP-CAR with aorto-PHA bypass graft case in Greece
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fotios Milas
- Departments of Surgery, Mitera-Hygeia Hospitals, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ushida Y, Inoue Y, Oba A, Mie T, Ito H, Ono Y, Sato T, Ozaka M, Sasaki T, Saiura A, Sasahira N, Takahashi Y. Optimizing Indications for Conversion Surgery Based on Analysis of 454 Consecutive Japanese Cases with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Who Received Modified FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5038-5050. [PMID: 35294658 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11503-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of initially unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC) has improved since the introduction of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) treatment. Nonetheless, the indications and optimal timing for conversion to resection remain unclear for UR-PC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of cases with initially UR-PC who received modified FFX or GNP treatment. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed 454 consecutive Japanese UR-PC cases who received modified FFX/GNP treatment. Cases were categorized according to resection status, and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a multivariable prognostic scoring model (0-4 points, higher score indicating more favorable prognostic factors). RESULTS The overall resection rate was 16% for locally advanced UR-PC (UR-LA) and 5% for metastatic UR-PC (UR-M). The resection group had better OS than the nonresection group (median OS time: not reached versus 13.0 months, P < 0.001). The independent prognostic factors were normalized CA19-9 concentration, modified Glasgow prognostic score of 0, tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy, chemotherapy duration ≥ 8 months, and resection. Cases were grouped according to their prognostic score, and the results suggested that candidates for resection might have prognostic scores of 4 points in UR-M cases or 2-4 points in UR-LA cases. CONCLUSIONS Stratification according to prognostic score was useful in predicting the outcomes of UR-PC cases and may aid in identifying cases who might benefit from surgical treatment after responding to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Ushida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Mie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oba A, Del Chiaro M, Satoi S, Kim SW, Takahashi H, Yu J, Hioki M, Tanaka M, Kato Y, Ariake K, Wu YHA, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Hackert T, Wolfgang CL, Besselink MG, Schulick RD, Nagakawa Y, Isaji S, Tsuchida A, Endo I. New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS). JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:725-731. [PMID: 34581016 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The symposium "New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer" was held during the 33nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) in 2021 to discuss the potential modifications that could be made in the current resectability classification. The meeting focused on setting the foundation for developing a new prognosis-based resectability classification that is based on the tumor biology and the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The symposium included selected experts from Western and Eastern high-volume centers who have discussed their concept of resectability status through published literature. During the symposium, presenters reported new resectability classifications from their respective institutions based on tumor biology, conditional status, pathology, and genetics, in addition to anatomical tumor involvement. Interestingly, experts from all the centers reached the agreement that anatomy alone is insufficient to define resectability in the current era of effective NAT. On behalf of the JSHBPS, we would like to summarize the content of the conference in this position paper. We also invite global experts as internal reviewers of this paper for intercontinental cooperation in creating an up-to-date, prognosis-based resectability classification that reflects the trends of contemporary clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Oba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department Surgery, Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Masayoshi Hioki
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyasu Kato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kyohei Ariake
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Y H Andrew Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Isaji
- Director of Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Akihiko Tsuchida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wiltberger G, den Dulk M, Bednarsch J, Czigany Z, Lang SA, Andert A, Lamberzt A, Heij LR, de Vos-Geelen J, Stommel MWJ, van Dam RM, Dejong C, Ulmer F, Neumann UP. Perioperative and long-term outcome of en-bloc arterial resection in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1119-1128. [PMID: 35078714 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic tumors are frequently diagnosed in a locally advanced stage with poor prognosis if untreated. This study assesses the safety and oncological outcomes of pancreatic surgery with arterial en-bloc resection. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent a pancreatic resection with arterial resection between 2011 and 2020. Univariable analyses were used to assess prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS Forty consecutive patients (22 female; 18 male) undergoing arterial resections were included. Surgical procedures consisted of 19 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD, 48%), 16 distal splenopancreatectomy (DSP, 40%), and 5 total pancreatectomies (TP, 12%). Arterial resection included hepatic arteries (HA, N = 23), coeliac trunk (TC, N = 15) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA, N = 2). Neoadjuvant therapy was applied in 22 patients (58%). Major complications after surgery were observed in 15% of cases. 90-day mortality was 5%. Median disease-free survival and median overall survival were for the R0/CRM- group 22.8 months and 27.9 months, 9.5 and 19.8 months for the R0/CRM+ group, and 10.1 and 13.1 months for the R1 group, respectively. CONCLUSION In highly selected patients, arterial en-bloc resection can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates and beneficial oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Wiltberger
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Zoltan Czigany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sven A Lang
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Anne Andert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Lamberzt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lara R Heij
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Florian Ulmer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gray S, de Liguori Carino N, Radhakrishna G, Lamarca A, Hubner RA, Valle JW, McNamara MG. Clinical challenges associated with utility of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1198-1208. [PMID: 35264307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasingly common cancer with a persistently poor prognosis, and only approximately 20% of patients are clearly anatomically resectable at diagnosis. Historically, a paucity of effective therapy made it inappropriate to forego the traditional gold standard of upfront surgery in favour of neoadjuvant treatment; however, modern combination chemotherapy regimens have made neoadjuvant therapy increasingly viable. As its use has expanded, the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy has evolved from one of 'downstaging' to one of early treatment of micro-metastases and selection of patients with favourable tumour biology for resection. Defining resectability in PDAC is problematic; multiple differing definitions exist. Multidisciplinary input, both in initial assessment of resectability and in supervision of multimodality therapy, is therefore advised. European and North American guidelines recommend the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable (BR)-PDAC. Similar regimens may be applied in locally advanced (LA)-PDAC with the aim of improving potential access to curative-intent resection, but appropriate patient selection is key due to significant rates of recurrence after excision of LA disease. Upfront surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy remain standard-of-care in clearly resectable PDAC, but multiple trials evaluating the use of neoadjuvant therapy in this and other localised settings are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gray
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola de Liguori Carino
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Ganesh Radhakrishna
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Hubner
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Juan W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Mairéad G McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:677-684. [PMID: 35290288 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is a burgeoning minimally invasive approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study was undertaken to compare survival after robotic vs "open" pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma using propensity score-matched patients. STUDY DESIGN With institutional review board approval, we prospectively followed 521 patients who underwent robotic (n = 311) or open (n = 210) pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients who underwent robotic (n = 75) or open (n = 75) pancreaticoduodenectomy were propensity score-matched by age, sex, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. Neoadjuvant therapy was rarely administered, and adjuvant therapy was stressed (FOLFIRINOX for patients <70 years of age and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel for patients >70 years of age). Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS Operative duration was longer and estimated blood loss and length of stay were less with robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (421 [409 ± 94.0] vs 267 [254 ± 81.2] minutes; 307 [(150 ± 605.3] vs 444 [255 ± 353.1] mL; 7 [5 ± 5.1] vs 11 [8 ± 9.5] days; p < 0.00001 for all). There were no differences in complications (Clavien-Dindo class ≥III, p = 0.30), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.61), or 30-day readmission rates (p = 0.19). Median survival after robotic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy was 37 vs 24 months (p = 0.08). For propensity score-matched patients, operative duration for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy was longer (442 [438 ± 117.7] vs 261 [249 ± 67.1] minutes) and estimated blood loss was less (269 [200 ± 296.1] vs 468 [300 ± 394.9] mL), as was length of stay (7 [5 ± 5.1] vs 10 [7 ± 8.6] days; p < 0.00001 for all). There were no differences in complication rates (Clavien-Dindo class ≥ III, p = 0.31) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.40); 30-day readmissions were fewer after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (7% vs 20%, p = 0.03). Median survival for the robotic vs the open approach was 41 vs 17 months (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Patients that underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had longer operations, less estimated blood loss, shorter length of stay, and fewer 30-day readmissions; they lived much longer than patients who underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy. We believe that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides salutary and survival benefits for reasons yet unknown.
Collapse
|
33
|
Loos M, Kester T, Klaiber U, Mihaljevic AL, Mehrabi A, Müller-Stich BM, Diener MK, Schneider MA, Berchtold C, Hinz U, Feisst M, Strobel O, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Arterial Resection in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Effective After a Learning Curve. Ann Surg 2022; 275:759-768. [PMID: 33055587 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the perioperative and oncologic long-term outcomes of patients with LAPC after surgical resection at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND The role of surgery in LAPC with arterial involvement is controversial. METHODS We analyzed 385 consecutive patients undergoing PAR (n = 195) or PAD (n = 190) of the encased artery for LAPC between January 1, 2003 and April 30, 2019. RESULTS There were 183 total pancreatectomies, 113 partial pancreatoduodenectomies, 79 distal pancreatectomies, and 10 resections for tumor recurrences, including 121 multivisceral resections and 171 venous resections. Forty-three patients (11.4%) had resectable oligometastatic disease. All of the 190 patients undergoing PAD (100%) and 95 of the 195 patients undergoing PAR (48.7%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The R0 (circumferential resection margin negative) resection rate was 28%. The median hospital stay was 15 days (range: 3-236). The median survival after surgery for LAPC was 20.1 months and the overall 5-year survival rate 12.5%. In-hospital mortality was 8.8% for the entire patient cohort (n = 385). With increasing case load and growing expertise, there was a significant reduction of in-hospital mortality to 4.8% (n = 186) after 2013 (P = 0.005). The learning curve of experienced pancreatic surgeons for PAR was 15 such procedures. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate that an arterial surgical approach is effective in LAPC with promising long-term survival. PAD after neoadjuvant treatment is safe. PAR is a technically demanding procedure and requires a high level of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kester
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat M Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin A Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vascular Resection in Pancreatectomy—Is It Safe and Useful for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051193. [PMID: 35267500 PMCID: PMC8909590 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease with poor prognosis and increased incidence. Surgical resection R0 remains the most important treatment to prolong survival in PDAC patients. In borderline and locally advanced cancer, vascular resection and reconstruction during pancreatectomy enables achieving R0 resection. This study is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the role of venous and arterial resection with vascular reconstruction in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease with poor prognosis and increased incidence. Surgical resection R0 remains the most important treatment to prolong survival in PDAC patients. In borderline and locally advanced cancer, vascular resection and reconstruction during pancreatectomy enables achieving R0 resection. This study is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the role of venous and arterial resection with vascular reconstruction in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The literature review is focused on the use of venous and arterial resection with immediate vascular reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Different types of venous and arterial resections are widely described. Different methods of vascular reconstructions, from primary vessel closure, through end-to-end vascular anastomosis, to interposition grafts with use autologous veins (internal jugular vein, saphenous vein, superficial femoral vein, external or internal iliac veins, inferior mesenteric vein, and left renal vein or gonadal vein), autologous substitute grafts constructed from various parts of parietal peritoneum including falciform ligament, cryopreserved and synthetic allografts. The most attention was given to the most common venous reconstructions, such as end-to-end anastomosis and interposition graft with the use of an autologous vein. Moreover, we presented mortality and morbidity rates as well as vascular patency and survival following pancreatectomy combined with vascular resection reported in cited articles.
Collapse
|
35
|
Irfan A, Rose JB, Wang TN, Vickers SM, Dudeja V, Gbolahan O, Reddy S. The Fate of Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Pancreas 2022; 51:100-105. [PMID: 35195602 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic cancer continues to be a major cause of cancer-related mortality. There has been a greater implementation of up-front chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Although there are many theoretical benefits to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, its clinical impact is uncertain. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients with resectable and borderline-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients were collected in a secure database from September 2018 to May 2020. Patients were excluded if they presented with locally advanced or metastatic disease, inability to complete chemotherapy, or if they were not a surgical candidate. RESULTS Sixty-six patients with resectable disease underwent chemotherapy. Folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan/oxaliplatin was used in 41 patients (62.1%) and gemcitabine-based regimens in 28 patients (42.4%, greater than 100% as some patients underwent both regimens). After restaging, 47 patients (71.2%) were thought to have resectable disease. Of these patients, 36 have been successfully resected to date. Metastatic disease was found in 12 patients (18.2%) and 6 patients (9.1%) had locally advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but a subset will develop local or distant progression. Further studies will be needed to determine which patients will progress locally and may benefit from an up-front surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Olumide Gbolahan
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Prognosis Based Definition of Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: A Road Map to New Guidelines. Ann Surg 2022; 275:175-181. [PMID: 32149822 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify objective preoperative prognostic factors that are able to predict long-term survival of patients affected by PDAC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In the modern era of improved systemic chemotherapy for PDAC, tumor biology, and response to chemotherapy are essential in defining prognosis and an improved approach is needed for classifying resectability beyond purely anatomic features. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database regarding patients diagnosed with PDAC from 2010 to 2016. Cox proportional hazard models were used to select preoperative baseline factors significantly associated with survival; final models for overall survival (OS) were internally validated and formed the basis of the nomogram. RESULTS A total of 7849 patients with PDAC were included with a median follow-up of 19 months. On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with OS included carbohydrate antigen 19-9, neoadjuvant treatment, tumor size, age, facility type, Charlson/Deyo score, primary site, and sex; T4 stage was not independently associated with OS. The cumulative score was used to classify patients into 3 groups: good, intermediate, and poor prognosis, respectively. The strength of our model was validated by a highly significant randomization test, Log-rank test, and simple hazard ratio; the concordance index was 0.59. CONCLUSION This new PDAC nomogram, based solely on preoperative variables, could be a useful tool to patients and counseling physicians in selecting therapy. This model suggests a new concept of resectability that is meant to reflect the biology of the tumor, thus partially overcoming existing definitions, that are mainly based on tumor anatomic features.
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Jolissaint JS, Reyngold M, Bassmann J, Seier KP, Gönen M, Varghese AM, Yu KH, Park W, O’Reilly EM, Balachandran VP, D’Angelica MI, Drebin JA, Kingham TP, Soares KC, Jarnagin WR, Crane CH, Wei AC. Local Control and Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Ablative Radiation Versus Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Vascular Involvement. Ann Surg 2021; 274:894-901. [PMID: 34269717 PMCID: PMC8599622 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to compare overall survival (OS) and disease control for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with ablative dose radiotherapy (A-RT) versus resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Locoregional treatment for PDAC includes resection when possible or palliative RT. A-RT may offer durable tumor control and encouraging survival. METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by A-RT [≥98 Gy biologically effective dose (BED) using 15-25 fractions in 3-4.5 Gy/fraction] or pancreatectomy. RESULTS One hundred and four patients received A-RT (49.8%) and 105 (50.2%) underwent resection. Patients receiving A-RT had larger median tumor size after induction chemotherapy [3.2 cm (undetectable-10.9) vs 2.6 cm (undetectable-10.7), P < 0.001], and were more likely to have celiac or hepatic artery encasement (48.1% vs 11.4%, P <0.001), or superior mesenteric artery encasement (43.3% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001); however, there was no difference in the degree of SMV/PV involvement (P = 0.123). There was no difference in locoregional recurrence/progression at 18-months between A-RT and resection; cumulative incidence was 16% [(95% confidence interval (CI) 10%-24%] versus 21% (95% CI 14%-30%), respectively (P= 0.252). However, patients receiving A-RT had a 19% higher 18-month cumulative incidence of distant recurrence/progression [58% (95% CI 48%-67%) vs 30% (95% CI 30%-49%), P= 0.004]. Median OS from completion of chemotherapy was 20.1 months for A-RT patients (95% CI 16.4-23.1 months) versus 32.9 months (95% CI 29.7-42.3 months) for resected patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Ablative radiation is a promising new treatment option for PDAC, offering locoregional disease control similar to that associated with resection and encouraging survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S. Jolissaint
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jared Bassmann
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth P. Seier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna M. Varghese
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth H. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Wungki Park
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eileen M. O’Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Jeffrey A. Drebin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - T. Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kevin C. Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bratlie SO, Wennerblom J, Vilhav C, Persson J, Rangelova E. Resectable, borderline, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-"the good, the bad, and the ugly" candidates for surgery? J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2450-2460. [PMID: 34790406 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-2020-slapc-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The possibility of surgical resection strongly overrules medical oncologic treatment and is the only modality, causa sine qua non, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with pancreatic cancer. For this reason, the clinical classification of local resectability, subdividing tumors into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced cancer, that is very technical in nature, is the one most widely used and accepted. As multimodality treatment with potent agents, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, seems to be stepping forward as the new standard of treatment of pancreatic cancer, the established technical surgical landmarks tend to get challenged. This review aims to highlight the grey zones in the current classifications for local tumor involvement with respect to the observed patient outcome in the current multimodality treatment era. It summarizes the latest reported series on the outcome of resected primary resectable, borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and particularly vascular resections during pancreatectomy, in the background of different types of neoadjuvant therapy. It also hints what the new horizons of cancer biology tend to reveal whenever the technical hinders start being pushed aside. The current calls for the necessity of re-classification of the clinical categories of pancreatic cancer, from technically oriented to biology-focused individualized approach, are being elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Olav Bratlie
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johanna Wennerblom
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Caroline Vilhav
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Persson
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wu YHA, Oba A, Lin R, Watanabe S, Meguid C, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Selecting surgical candidates with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for modern pancreatology. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2475-2483. [PMID: 34790408 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is likely to become the second leading cause of malignancy-associated mortality within the next 10 years and surgery remains the best hope for cure. The introduction of effective neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has increased the resection rate of PC in the era of contemporary pancreatology. This review summarizes the surgical selection criteria for locally advanced PC (LAPC), by focusing on the commonly used predictors for resectability and better overall survival outcome. Based on the currently available evidence, the role of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and patient's tumor response to NAT are critical in surgical candidacy selection. Although, consensus on surgical candidacy selection for LAPC still needs to be made, several data have shown that surgery provides the most optimistic chance of cure for PC. Surgery is, therefore, recommended whenever the benefits of pancreatectomy outweigh surgical complications, and the chance of local or distant metastases in the postoperative setting is low. This review also provided our insight for and experience in selecting surgical candidates by focusing on optimizing the overall survival of LAPC patients. Nevertheless, a collaborative approach to formulating standardized criteria for surgical candidate selection and treatment guidelines for LAPC is a common goal that pancreatologists worldwide should focus on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y H Andrew Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ronggui Lin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuichi Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Cheryl Meguid
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Heckler M, Hackert T. Surgery for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-is it only about the vessels? J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2503-2511. [PMID: 34790411 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an oligosymptomatic disease, that is usually diagnosed in an advanced tumor stage. Traditionally, only the small subset of patients with tumors that showed no signs of vascular infiltration and distant metastases proceeded to surgery-still the only curative therapeutic modality to date. The remaining majority of patients received palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiation, usually with gemcitabine monotherapy. While gemcitabine monotherapy results in improved survival compared to best supportive care, most patients still succumb to the disease under therapy in a relatively short amount of time. Over the last years and decades, paradigms have shifted in PDAC treatment and potent multidrug chemotherapy protocols, including gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX, result in sufficient downstaging of advanced tumors in many patients. In this context, more and more patients are eligible for exploration and often resection. In this review we discuss the current state of the art in the clinical management and surgical treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, including classifications of locally advanced and borderline disease and surgical strategies for extended resections. An emphasis is put on arterial and venous resections and their outcome. In the end, we discuss current gaps in the literature and propose directions future research endeavors should focus on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nießen A, Hackert T. State-of-the-art surgery for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:443-450. [PMID: 34751822 PMCID: PMC8933301 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02362-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The d evelopment of surgical techniques and specialization and specifically complication management in pancreatic surgery have improved surgical outcomes as well as oncological results in pancreatic surgery in recent decades. Historical morbidity and especially mortality rates of up to 80% have decreased to below 5% today. This review summarizes the current state of the art in pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS The present literature and clinical experience are summarized to give an overview of the present best practice in pancreatic surgery as one of the most advanced surgical disciplines today. RESULTS Based on the available literature, three important aspects contribute to best patient care in pancreatic surgery, namely, surgical progress, interdisciplinary complication management, and multimodal oncological treatment in case of pancreatic cancer. In addition, minimally invasive and robotic procedures are currently fields of development and specific topics of research. CONCLUSION In experienced hands, pancreatic surgery-despite being one of the most challenging fields of surgery-is a safe domain today. The impact of multimodal, especially adjuvant, therapy for oncological indications is well established and evidence-based. New technologies are evolving and will be evaluated with high-evidence studies in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Nießen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Huffman DL, Vusqa UT, Shankar K, Alnimer L, Samhouri Y, Srinivasamaharaj S, Malayala SV, Monga D. An Internal Review of Rates of Palliative Medicine Referral for Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Cureus 2021; 13:e19670. [PMID: 34976460 PMCID: PMC8682948 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that patients with advanced cancer receive palliative care services in concurrence with active treatment. While the benefits of palliative care are clear, integration of palliative care can be challenging. We aim to review rates of palliative care consultation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer at our institution, intending to improve these rates. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of all patients with pancreatic cancer treated at Allegheny General Hospital diagnosed between 2009-2020. Summary statistics are presented as percentages for categorical data and median with interquartile range for quantitative data. Results Of the 171 patients reviewed, 121 completed all treatment and evaluation within our health network (Pittsburgh, United States). The median age was 63 years (IQR 40-91 years); 55 patients (45%) were male; the majority were white (107 patients, 88%). At the time of diagnosis, 28% of our patients had stage IV disease (34 patients), and 19.8% of patients who developed stage IV disease had palliative care referrals. Conclusions Palliative care is an integral part of usual care for advanced pancreatic cancer. Our analysis showed that palliative care is underutilized in our hospital. We aim to improve palliative care integration in our patients’ care by adding a hard stop to electronic medical records to remind physicians to offer palliative care to our patients with pancreatic cancer and to arrange lecture series to emphasize the importance of palliative care in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Urwat T Vusqa
- Internal Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Karthik Shankar
- Internal Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Lynna Alnimer
- Internal Medicine, Ascension Providence Hospital, Southfield, USA
| | - Yazan Samhouri
- Department of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | | | - Dulabh Monga
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rangelova EB. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer-a resectable disease? J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2447-2449. [PMID: 34790405 PMCID: PMC8576245 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elena B Rangelova
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, The Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gao Y, Wang M, Guo X, Hu J, Chen TM, Finn SMB, Lacy J, Kunstman JW, Cha CH, Bellin MD, Robert ME, Desir GV, Gorelick FS. Renalase is a novel tissue and serological biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250539. [PMID: 34587190 PMCID: PMC8480607 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Dysregulated expression of the secretory protein renalase can promote pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) growth in animal models. We characterized renalase expression in premalignant and malignant PDAC tissue and investigated whether plasma renalase levels corresponded to clinical PDAC characteristics. Renalase immunohistochemistry was used to determine the presence and distribution of renalase in normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, PDAC precursor lesions, and PDAC tissues. Associations between pretreatment plasma renalase and PDAC clinical status were assessed in patients with varied clinical stages of PDAC and included tumor characteristics, surgical resection in locally advanced/borderline resectable PDAC, and overall survival. Data were retrospectively obtained and correlated using non-parametric analysis. Little to no renalase was detected by histochemistry in the normal pancreatic head in the absence of abdominal trauma. In chronic pancreatitis, renalase immunoreactivity localized to peri-acinar spindle-shaped cells in some samples. It was also widely present in PDAC precursor lesions and PDAC tissue. Among 240 patients with PDAC, elevated plasma renalase levels were associated with worse tumor characteristics, including greater angiolymphatic invasion (80.0% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.012) and greater node positive disease (76.5% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.024). Overall survival was worse in patients with high plasma renalase levels with median follow-up of 27.70 months vs. 65.03 months (p < 0.001). Renalase levels also predicted whether patients with locally advanced/borderline resectable PDAC underwent resection (AUC 0.674; 95%CI 0.42-0.82, p = 0.04). Overall tissue renalase was increased in both premalignant and malignant PDAC tissues compared to normal pancreas. Elevated plasma renalase levels were associated with advanced tumor characteristics, decreased overall survival, and reduced resectability in patients with locally advanced/borderline resectable PDAC. These studies show that renalase levels are increased in premalignant pancreatic tissues and that its levels in plasma correspond to the clinical behavior of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasheen Gao
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Melinda Wang
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Xiaojia Guo
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Joanna Hu
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Tian-min Chen
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Sade´ M. B. Finn
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Jill Lacy
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - John W. Kunstman
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine and VA Connecticut, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Charles H. Cha
- Department of Surgery, Hartford Healthcare Saint Vincent’s Medical Center, Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Melena D. Bellin
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Marie E. Robert
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Gary V. Desir
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Fred S. Gorelick
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giannone F, Capretti G, Abu Hilal M, Boggi U, Campra D, Cappelli C, Casadei R, De Luca R, Falconi M, Giannotti G, Gianotti L, Girelli R, Gollini P, Ippolito D, Limerutti G, Maganuco L, Malagnino V, Malleo G, Morone M, Mosconi C, Mrakic F, Palumbo D, Salvia R, Sgroi S, Zerbi A, Balzano G. Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer Is in the Eye of the Observer: A Multicenter, Blinded, Prospective Assessment of Interobserver Agreement on NCCN Resectability Status Criteria. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e087. [PMID: 37635813 PMCID: PMC10455302 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the reproducibility of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) resectability status classification for pancreatic cancer. Background The NCCN classification defines 3 resectability classes (resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced), according to vascular invasion. It is used to recommend different approaches and stratify patients during clinical trials. Methods Prospective, multicenter, observational study (trial ID: NCT03673423). Main outcome measure was the interobserver agreement of tumor assignment to different resectability classes and quantification of vascular invasion degrees. Agreement was measured by Fleiss' k (k = 1 perfect agreement; k = 0 agreement by chance). Sixty-nine computed tomography (CT) scans of pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by 22 observers from 11 hospitals (11 surgeons and 11 radiologists). Rating differences between surgeons or radiologists and between hospitals with different volumes (≥60 or <60 resections/year) were assessed. Results Complete agreement among 22 observers was recorded in 5 CT scans (7.2%), whereas 25 CT scans (36.2%) were variously assigned to all 3 resectability classes. Interobserver agreement varied from fair to moderate (Fleiss' k range: 0.282-0.555), with the lowest agreement for borderline resectable tumors. Assessing vascular contact ≤180° had the lowest agreement for all vessels (k range: 0.196-0.362). The highest concordance was recorded for venous invasion >180° (k range: 0.619-0.756). Neither reviewers' specialty nor hospital volume influenced the agreement. Conclusions There is high variability in the assignment to resectability categories, which may compromise the reliability of treatments recommendations and the evidence of trials stratifying patients in resectability classes. Criteria should be revised to allow a reproducible classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Giannone
- From the Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-pancreato-biliary Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Donata Campra
- General Surgery and Emergency Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Carla Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, University of Pisa and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna and Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II,” Bari, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- From the Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Giannotti
- Department of Radiology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Gianotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Roberto Girelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, “P. Pederzoli” Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Gollini
- Radiology and Neuroradiology Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Limerutti
- Department of Radiology 2, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Maganuco
- General Surgery Unit 2 and Pancreas Group, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Malagnino
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II,” Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico “S. Orsola Malpighi,” Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Mrakic
- Department of Radiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Palumbo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Sgroi
- Department of Radiology, “P.Pederzoli” Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- From the Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Verbeke C, Webster F, Brosens L, Campbell F, Del Chiaro M, Esposito I, Feakins RM, Fukushima N, Gill AJ, Kakar S, Kench JG, Krasinskas AM, van Laethem JL, Schaeffer DF, Washington K. Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2021; 79:902-912. [PMID: 34379823 DOI: 10.1111/his.14540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Current guidelines for the pathology reporting on pancreatic cancer differ in certain aspects, resulting in divergent reporting practice and a lack of comparability of data. Here we report on a new international dataset for the pathology reporting of resection specimens with cancer of the exocrine pancreas (ductal adenocarcinoma and acinar cell carcinoma). The dataset was produced under the auspices of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), a global alliance of major (inter-)national pathology and cancer organisations. METHODS AND RESULTS According to the ICCR's rigorous process for dataset development, an international expert panel consisting of pancreatic pathologists, a pancreatic surgeon and an oncologist produced a set of core and non-core data items based on a critical review and discussion of current evidence. Commentary was provided for each data item to explain the rationale for selecting it as a core or non-core element, its clinical relevance, and to highlight potential areas of disagreement or lack of evidence, in which case a consensus position was formulated. Following international public consultation, the document was finalised and ratified, and the dataset, which includes a synoptic reporting guide, was published on the ICCR website. CONCLUSIONS This first international dataset for cancer of the exocrine pancreas is intended to promote high quality, standardised pathology reporting. Its widespread adoption will improve consistency of reporting, facilitate multidisciplinary communication and enhance comparability of data, all of which will help to improve the management of pancreatic cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fleur Webster
- International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lodewijk Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands and Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Pathology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, United States
| | - Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roger M Feakins
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anthony J Gill
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Sanjay Kakar
- Department of Pathology, University of California, M590 San Francisco, United States
| | - James G Kench
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Alyssa M Krasinskas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, United States
| | - Jean-Luc van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Medical Oncology, Hôpital Erasme and Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David F Schaeffer
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kay Washington
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pancreatectomy Combined with Arterial Resection for Pancreatic Carcinoma with Arterial Infiltration: A Meta-analysis. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02552-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
49
|
Extended Venous Resections for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma-A Retrospective Studies of Nine Cases. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9080978. [PMID: 34442115 PMCID: PMC8392255 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9080978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The only chance to improve the long-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer is surgery with radical intent. METHODS in the present paper, we aim to describe a case series of 9 patients submitted to radical surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. RESULTS in all cases, negative resection margins were achieved. The types of venous resection consisted of tangential portal vein resection in four cases, circumferential portal vein resection with direct reanastomosis in one case and circumferential resection with graft placement in another four cases; postoperatively, one patient developed a vascular surgery-related complication consisting of graft thrombosis and thus necessitated prolonged anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS extended venous resections can be a safe and efficient way to maximize the benefits of radical surgery in locally advanced, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
50
|
Oba A, Wu YHA, Lieu CH, Meguid C, Colborn KL, Beaty L, Al-Musawi MH, Davis SL, Leal AD, Purcell T, King G, Wooten ES, Fujiwara Y, Goodman KA, Schefter T, Karam SD, Gleisner AL, Ahrendt S, Leong S, Messersmith WA, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Outcome of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients: comparative, observational cohort study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:976-982. [PMID: 34155509 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of neoadjuvant therapy for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer has been debatable. With FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showing tremendous effects in improving the overall survival of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, there is no definitive consensus regarding the use of this regimen in the elderly. METHODS This study evaluated the eligibility of elderly patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer for neoadjuvant therapy. Patients registered in the database of pancreatic cancer at the University of Colorado Cancer Center, who underwent neoadjuvant treatment between January 2011 and March 2019, were separated into three age groups (less than 70, 70-74, 75 or more years) and respective treatment outcomes were compared. RESULTS The study included 246 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment, of whom 154 and 71 received chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and GnP respectively. Among these 225 patients, 155 were younger than 70 years, 36 were aged 70-74 years, and 34 were aged 75 years or older. Patients under 70 years old received FOLFIRINOX most frequently (124 of 155 versus 18 of 36 aged 70-74 years, and 12 of 34 aged 75 years or more; P < 0.001). Resectability was similar among the three groups (60.0, 58.3, and 55.9 per cent respectively; P = 0.919). Trends towards shorter survival were observed in the elderly (median overall survival time 23.6, 18.0, and 17.6 months for patients aged less than 70, 70-74, and 75 or more years respectively; P = 0.090). After adjusting for co-variables, age was not a significant predictive factor. CONCLUSION The safety and efficacy of multiagent chemotherapy in patients aged 75 years or over were similar to those in younger patients. Modern multiagent regimens could be a safe and viable treatment option for clinically fit patients aged at least 75 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Oba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y H A Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - C H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - C Meguid
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - K L Colborn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - L Beaty
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - M H Al-Musawi
- Clinical Trials Office, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - S L Davis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - A D Leal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - T Purcell
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - G King
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - E S Wooten
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Y Fujiwara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - K A Goodman
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - T Schefter
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - S D Karam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - A L Gleisner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - S Ahrendt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - S Leong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - W A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - R D Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - M Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|