1
|
Catalano G, Alaimo L, Chatzipanagiotou OP, Ruzzenente A, Aucejo F, Marques HP, Bhimani N, Hugh T, Maithel SK, Kitago M, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Advantage of Log Odds of Metastatic Lymph Nodes After Curative-Intent Resection of Gallbladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1742-1751. [PMID: 39542966 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16492-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is among the most important predictors of poor prognosis after surgery for gallbladder cancer (GBC). Traditionally, staging has been based on the raw count of LNM, with a high risk of understaging patients who undergo inadequate lymph node dissection (LND). The log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) may represent an alternative staging approach to stratify patients more accurately after resection of GBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this cross-sectional study, patients who underwent curative-intent surgery with LND for GBC were identified from an international database. Two predictive models were built and compared, each integrating a different lymph nodes status indicator [i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and LODDS]. RESULTS Among 199 patients, the median number of lymph nodes examined was 5 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.0, 8.0]; most patients had T1 (n = 26, 13.1%) or T2 (n = 97, 48.7%) disease, and a subset had LNM (n = 87, 44.0%). Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated LODDS was an independent predictor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.3; p < 0.001]. The LODDS model demonstrated better performance compared with a traditional model that utilized the AJCC N category [concordance (C) index: 0.814 versus 0.763; p < 0.001]. Patients classified as high- versus low-risk based on LODDS had much worse overall survival (OS) (4.9% versus 83.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). The LODDS model performance remained high even among patients with inadequate LND (< 6 LN) (C index: 0.87). An online calculator was developed ( https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/LoddsGBC/ ). CONCLUSIONS A novel prognostic model based on LODDS may overcome the inherent limitations of the current AJCC staging system, reducing understaging among patients with fewer than six total lymph nodes evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nazim Bhimani
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tom Hugh
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Catalano G, Pawlik TM. ASO Author Reflections: Log Odds of Metastatic Lymph Nodes After Curative-Intent Resection of Gallbladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1823-1824. [PMID: 39557720 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16557-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
- The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Oncology, Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Waller GC, Sarpel U. Gallbladder Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:1263-1280. [PMID: 39448127 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary tract malignancy, often detected incidentally post-cholecystectomy or at an advanced stage, historically linked to a poor prognosis. Advances in minimally invasive surgery and systemic therapies have improved outcomes. Global incidence varies, with risk factors including gender, age, gallbladder disease history, and polyp size influencing malignancy risks. Management involves cross-sectional imaging, staging laparoscopy in select cases, and radical cholecystectomy with lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy, though its use is limited. Trials are ongoing assessing the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Prognosis depends on the tumor stage, with early detection crucial for long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo C Waller
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street, Suite B17, Box #1259, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. https://twitter.com/gwallermd
| | - Umut Sarpel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Shapiro Clinical Building, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Banh S, Fehervari M, Flod S, Soleimani-Nouri P, Leyte Golpe A, Ahmad R, Pai M, Spalding DR. Single stage management of suspected gallbladder cancer guided by intraoperative frozen section analysis: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:6314-6320. [PMID: 38704628 PMCID: PMC11487023 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of radiologically suspected gallbladder cancers (GBC) that lack definitive radiological features usually involves performing a first-stage routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy, followed by an open second-stage liver resection (segments IVB and V) and hilar lymphadenectomy (extended cholecystectomy) if subsequent formal histology confirms a malignancy. Performing a cholecystectomy with an intraoperative frozen section to guide the need for conversion to an extended cholecystectomy as a single-stage procedure has multiple benefits compared to a two-stage approach. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach have not yet been evaluated in a tertiary setting. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of all consecutive patients with suspected GBC who had been referred to our tertiary unit. Following routine cholecystectomy, depending on the operative findings, the gallbladder specimen was removed and sent for frozen-section analysis. If malignancy was confirmed, the depth of tumour invasion was evaluated, followed by simultaneous extended cholecystectomy, when appropriate. The sensitivity and specificity of frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of GBC were measured using formal histopathology as a reference standard. RESULTS A total of 37 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed. In nine cases, GBC was confirmed by intraoperative frozen section analysis, three of which had standard cholecystectomy only as their frozen section showed adenocarcinoma to be T1a or below ( n =2) or were undetermined ( n =1). In the remaining six cases, malignant invasion beyond the muscularis propria (T1b or above) was confirmed; thus, a synchronous extended cholecystectomy was performed. The sensitivity (95% CI: 66.4-100%) and specificity (95% CI: 87.7-100%) for identifying GBC using frozen section analysis were both 100%. The net cost of the single-stage pathway in comparison to the two-stage pathway resulted in overall savings of £3894. CONCLUSION Intraoperative frozen section analysis is a reliable tool for guiding the use of a safe, single-stage approach for the management of GBC in radiologically equivocal cases. In addition to its lower costs compared to a conventional two-stage procedure, intraoperative analysis also affords the benefit of a single hospital admission and single administration of general anaesthesia, thus greatly enhancing the patient's experience and relieving the burden on waiting lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Banh
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital
| | - Matyas Fehervari
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital
- Department of Surgery and Cancer
| | - Sara Flod
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital
| | | | - Antonio Leyte Golpe
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Grimsby
| | - Raida Ahmad
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Madhava Pai
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital
- Department of Surgery and Cancer
| | - Duncan R.C. Spalding
- Department of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital
- Department of Surgery and Cancer
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tirca L, Savin C, Stroescu C, Balescu I, Petrea S, Diaconu C, Gaspar B, Pop L, Varlas V, Hasegan A, Martac C, Bolca C, Stoian M, Zgura A, Gorecki GP, Bacalbasa N. Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4201. [PMID: 39064241 PMCID: PMC11278318 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis, usually discovered late due to nonspecific symptoms; therefore, over the last years, attention has been focused on identifying the risk factors for developing this malignancy in order to provide an early diagnosis, as well as new prognostic factors in order to modulate the long-term evolution of such cases. The aim of this review is to discuss both major risk factors and prognostic factors in GBC for a better understanding and integration of relevant and currently available information. Methods: A literature search was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and Web of Science; studies published after the year of 2000, in English, were reviewed. Results: Over time, risk factors associated with the development of GBC have been identified, which outline the profile of patients with this disease. The most important prognostic factors in GBC remain TNM staging, safety margin, and R0 status, along with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Both the technique and experience of the surgeons and a pathological examination that ensures final staging are particularly important and increase the chances of survival of the patients. Conclusions: improvements in surgical techniques and pathological analyses might provide better and more consistent guidance for medical staff in the management of patients with GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiza Tirca
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Catalin Savin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Cezar Stroescu
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Sorin Petrea
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Surgery, “Ion Cantacuzino” Clinical Hospital, 020026 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Gaspar
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Lucian Pop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Institute of Mother and Child Care Alessandrescu-Rusescu, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Valentin Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adrian Hasegan
- Department of Urology, Sibiu Emergency Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Cristina Martac
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fundeni Clinical Hospital, 022336 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ciprian Bolca
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Marius Nasta’ National Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Charles LeMoyne’ Hospital, Longueuil, QC J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Marilena Stoian
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Dr Ion Cantacuzino Hospital, 011438 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Zgura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncological Institute Prof.Dr.Al.Trestioreanu, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriel Petre Gorecki
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, CF 2 Clinical Hospital, 014256 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 021251 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lendoire J, Gil L. Controversies and future directions in the management of gallbladder cancer. ONCOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2023. [DOI: 10.1097/ot9.0000000000000003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
AbstractGallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy worldwide, with 140,000 new patients each year and more than 100,000 deaths annually. The review aims to address the controversial aspects of managing GBC. Regional differences of the study worldwide remain pending, and comparative mutational profiles will provide more information on the pathogenesis of GBC. However, certain pathologic aspects are discussed, such as the staging of early GBC, outcome differences between T2 pathologically staged patients, and the necessity of a uniform pathologic report. The surgical management of GBC is still under debate. The extent of liver resection, type of lymphadenectomy, and selection of patients for extended resection are aspects of the disease that require revision. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches were initially slow to develop. However, with time, they have demonstrated their value in the surgical management of GBC. The OMEGA survey, performed to analyze the management practice of surgical treatment of GBC worldwide, demonstrated differences from the recommended guidelines. The OMEGA study, the largest cohort study, examined the outcomes of surgical intervention in 3676 patients from 133 centers. Regarding future directions, the value of collaborative efforts between centers and regions must be emphasized to better understand the different aspects of the disease and globally improve therapeutic strategies for GBC.
Collapse
|
7
|
Park Y, Lee JS, Lee B, Jo Y, Lee E, Kang M, Kwon W, Lim CS, Jang JY, Han HS, Yoon YS. Prognostic Effect of Liver Resection in Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer Revisited: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 278:985-993. [PMID: 37218510 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effect of liver resection on the prognosis of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC). BACKGROUND Although extended cholecystectomy [lymph node dissection (LND) + liver resection] is recommended for T2 GBC, recent studies have shown that liver resection does not improve survival outcomes relative to LND alone. METHODS Patients with pT2 GBC who underwent extended cholecystectomy as an initial procedure and did not reoperation after cholecystectomy at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed. Extended cholecystectomy was defined as either LND with liver resection (LND+L group) or LND only (LND group). We conducted 2:1 propensity score matching to compare the survival outcomes of the groups. RESULTS Of the 197 patients enrolled, 100 patients from the LND+L group and 50 from the LND group were successfully matched. The LND+L group experienced greater estimated blood loss ( P <0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay ( P =0.047). There was no significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the 2 groups (82.7% vs 77.9%, respectively, P =0.376). A subgroup analysis showed that the 5-year DFS was similar in the 2 groups in both T substages (T2a: 77.8% vs 81.8%, respectively, P =0.988; T2b: 88.1% vs 71.5%, respectively, P =0.196). In a multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 4.80, P =0.006] and perineural invasion (HR 2.61, P =0.047) were independent risk factors for DFS; liver resection was not a prognostic factor (HR 0.68, P =0.381). CONCLUSIONS Extended cholecystectomy including LND without liver resection may be a reasonable treatment option for selected T2 GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeshong Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeongsoo Jo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunhye Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - MeeYoung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Sup Lim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang X, Zheng K, Huang J, Hu W, Xu L, Xu Q, Fan Y, Liu J, Li B, Ran L, Liu T, Liang B, Xiong H, Li W, Fu X, Fang L. Effect of different lymph node dissection methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and prognosis in gallbladder cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34163. [PMID: 37390255 PMCID: PMC10313244 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
At present, the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still controversial, and there is no evidence that LND improves prognosis, however, the latest guidelines for GBC recommend that removal of more than 6 lymph nodes facilitates staging of regional lymph nodes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different LND methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and assess the prognostic factors during radical resection of GBC. This study retrospectively analyzed 133 patients (46 men and 87 women; average age: 64.01, range: 40-83 years) who underwent radical resection of GBC in a single center between July 2017 and July 2022, of which 41 underwent fusion lymph node dissection (FLND) and 92 underwent standard lymph node dissection (SLND). Baseline data, surgical results, number of LNDs, and follow-up data were analyzed. Each patient was followed up every 3 months. The total number of lymph nodes detected after the operation was 12.00 ± 6.95 versus 6.10 ± 4.71 (P < .05). The number of positive lymph nodes detected was (mean) 1.85 versus 0.78 and (percentage) 15.45% versus 12.83% (P < .05). Postoperative complications (8 vs 23, P > .05). The progression-free survival was 13 versus 8 months, the median survival time was 17 versus 9 months (P < .05). This study concluded that FLND can increase the detection rate of total lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes after surgery, which can prolong the survival time of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinguo Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Kangpeng Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Liangzhi Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Qi Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yuting Fan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jinghang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bowen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Longjian Ran
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Tiande Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hu Xiong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaowei Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Lu Fang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Younos A, Touadi M, Ross S, Sucandy I. Robotic Systematic Portal Lymphadenectomy. Description of Surgical Technique. Am Surg 2023:31348231161079. [PMID: 36943025 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231161079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Portal lymphadenectomy is an integral part of gallbladder, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection to improve staging and prognostication. This is also believed by many oncologists to potentially serve as therapy to remove cancer containing nodes. While the current guideline requires removal of at least 6 portal lymphnodes, many surgeons face technical difficulty in performing the systematic portal lymphadenectomy especially in minimally invasive fashion. The anatomical complexity of biliovascular structures within the porta hepatis contributes to this technical challenge. In this video, we demonstrate our robotic technique of systematic portal lymphadenectomy for the treatment of gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Younos
- 4422Department of Surgery, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Melissa Touadi
- 4422Department of Surgery, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- 4422Department of Surgery, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- 4422Department of Surgery, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pehlivanoglu B, Akkas G, Memis B, Basturk O, Reid MD, Saka B, Dursun N, Bagci P, Balci S, Sarmiento J, Maithel SK, Bandyopadhyay S, Escalona OT, Araya JC, Losada H, Goodman M, Knight JH, Roa JC, Adsay V. Reappraisal of T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC): clinicopathologic analysis of 473 in situ and invasive GBCs and critical review of the literature highlights its rarity, and that it has a very good prognosis. Virchows Arch 2023; 482:311-323. [PMID: 36580138 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03482-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
There are highly conflicting data on relative frequency (2-32%), prognosis, and management of pT1b-gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), with 5-year survival ranging from > 90% in East/Chile where cholecystectomy is regarded as curative, versus < 50% in the West, with radical operations post-cholecystectomy being recommended by guidelines. A total of 473 in situ and invasive extensively sampled GBCs from the USA (n = 225) and Chile (n = 248) were re-evaluated histopathologically per Western invasiveness criteria. 349 had invasive carcinoma, and only 24 were pT1. Seven cases previously staged as pT1b were re-classified as pT2. There were 19 cases (5% of all invasive GBCs) qualified as pT1b and most pT1b carcinomas were minute (< 1mm). One patient with extensive pTis at margins (but pT1b focus away from the margins) died of GBC at 27 months, two died of other causes, and the remainder were alive without disease (median follow-up 69.9 months; 5-year disease-specific survival, 92%). In conclusion, careful pathologic analysis of well-sampled cases reveals that only 5% of invasive GBCs are pT1b, with a 5-year disease-specific survival of > 90%, similar to findings in the East. This supports the inclusion of pT1b in the "early GBC" category, as is typically done in high-incidence regions. Pathologic mis-staging of pT2 as pT1 is not uncommon. Cases should not be classified as pT1b unless extensive, preferably total, sampling of the gallbladder to rule out a subtle pT2 is performed. Critical appraisal of the literature reveals that the Western guidelines are based on either SEER or mis-interpretation of stage IB cases as "pT1b." Although the prognosis of pT1b-GBC is very good, additional surgery (radical cholecystectomy) may be indicated, and long-term surveillance of the biliary tract is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Pehlivanoglu
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Gizem Akkas
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kutahya University of Health Sciences, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Bahar Memis
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Burcu Saka
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nevra Dursun
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pelin Bagci
- Department of Pathology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serdar Balci
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Juan Sarmiento
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Araya
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Dr. Hernan Henriquez Aravena, Temuco, Chile
| | - Hector Losada
- Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica Holley Knight
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Juan Carlos Roa
- Department of Pathology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University Hospital, Davutpaşa Caddesi No:4, Topkapi, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clockwise Anterior-to-Posterior-Double Isolation (CAP-DI) Approach for Portal Lymphadenectomy in Biliary Tract Cancer: Technique, Yield, and Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235770. [PMID: 36497252 PMCID: PMC9738406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Portal lymphadenectomy (PLND) is the current standard for oncologic resection of biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, published data show it is performed infrequently and often yields less than the recommended 6 lymph nodes. We sought to identify yield and outcomes using a Clockwise Anterior-to-Posterior technique with Double Isolation of critical structures (CAP-DI) for PLND. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing complete PLND for BTCs using CAP-DI technique were identified (2015−2021). Lymph node (LN) yield and predictors of LN count were examined. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, which were compared to patients having hepatectomy without PLND. Results: In total, 534 patients were included; 71 with complete PLND (36 gallbladder cancers, 24 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 11 perihilar cholangiocarcinomas) and 463 in the control group. The median PLND yield was 5 (IQR 3−8; range 0−17) and 46% had at least 6 nodes retrieved. Older age was associated with lower likelihood of ≥6 node PLND yield (p = 0.032), which remained significant in bivariate analyses with other covariates (p < 0.05). After adjustment for operative factors, performance of complete PLND was independently associated with longer operative time (+46.4 min, p = 0.001), but no differences were observed in intraoperative or postoperative outcomes compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Yield following PLND frequently falls below the recommended minimum threshold of 6 nodes despite a standardized stepwise approach to complete clearance. Older age may be weakly associated with lower PLND yield. While all efforts should be made for complete node retrieval, failure to obtain 6 nodes may be an unrealistic metric of surgical quality.
Collapse
|
12
|
Balakrishnan A, Jah A, Lesurtel M, Andersson B, Gibbs P, Harper SJF, Huguet EL, Kosmoliaptsis V, Liau SS, Praseedom RK, Ramia JM, Branes A, Lendoire J, Maithel S, Serrablo A, Achalandabaso M, Adham M, Ahmet A, Al-Sarireh B, Albiol Quer M, Alconchel F, Alejandro R, Alsammani M, Alseidi A, Anand A, Anselmo A, Antonakis P, Arabadzhieva E, de Aretxabala X, Aroori S, Ashley S, Ausania F, Banerjee A, Barabino M, Bartlett A, Bartsch F, Belli A, Beristain-Hernandez J, Berrevoet F, Bhatti A, Bhojwani R, Bjornsson B, Blaz T, Byrne M, Calvo M, Castellanos J, Castro M, Cavallucci D, Chang D, Christodoulis G, Ciacio O, Clavien P, Coker A, Conde-Rodriguez M, D'Amico F, D'Hondt M, Daams F, Dasari B, De Beillis M, de Meijer V, Dede K, Deiro G, Delgado F, Desai G, Di Gioia A, Di Martino M, Dixon M, Dorovinis P, Dumitrascu T, Ebata T, Eilard M, Erdmann J, Erkan M, Famularo S, Felli E, Fergadi M, Fernandez G, Fox A, Galodha S, Galun D, Ganandha S, Garcia R, Gemenetzis G, Giannone F, Gil L, Giorgakis E, Giovinazzo F, Giuffrida M, Giuliani T, Giuliante F, Gkekas I, Goel M, Goh B, Gomes A, Gruenberger T, Guevara O, Gulla A, Gupta A, Gupta R, Hakeem A, Hamid H, Heinrich S, Helton S, Heumann A, Higuchi R, Hughes D, Inarejos B, Ivanecz A, Iwao Y, Iype S, Jaen I, Jie M, Jones R, Kacirek K, Kalayarasan R, Kaldarov A, Kaman L, Kanhere H, Kapoor V, Karanicolas P, Karayiannakis A, Kausar A, Khan Z, Kim DS, Klose J, Knowles B, Koh P, Kolodziejczyk P, Komorowski A, Koong J, Kozyrin I, Krishna A, Kron P, Kumar N, van Laarhoven S, Lakhey P, Lanari J, Laurenzi A, Leow V, Limbu Y, Liu YB, Lob S, Lolis E, Lopez-Lopez V, Lozano R, Lundgren L, Machairas M, Magouliotis D, Mahamid A, Malde D, Malek A, Malik H, Malleo G, Marino M, Mayo S, Mazzola M, Memeo R, Menon K, Menzulin R, Mohan R, Morgul H, Moris D, Mulita F, Muttillo E, Nahm C, Nandasena M, Nashidengo P, Nickkholgh A, Nikov A, Noel C, O'Reilly D, O'Rourke T, Ohtsuka M, Omoshoro-Jones J, Pandanaboyana S, Pararas N, Patel R, Patkar S, Peng J, Perfecto A, Perinel J, Perivoliotis K, Perra T, Phan M, Piccolo G, Porcu A, Primavesi F, Primrose J, Pueyo-Periz E, Radenkovic D, Rammohan A, Rowcroft A, Sakata J, Saladino E, Schena C, Scholer A, Schwarz C, Serrano P, Silva M, Soreide K, Sparrelid E, Stattner S, Sturesson C, Sugiura T, Sumo M, Sutcliffe R, Teh C, Teo J, Tepetes K, Thapa P, Thepbunchonchai A, Torres J, Torres O, Torzili G, Tovikkai C, Troncoso A, Tsoulfas G, Tuzuher A, Tzimas G, Umar G, Urbani L, Vanagas T, Varga, Velayutham V, Vigano L, Wakai T, Yang Z, Yip V, Zacharoulis D, Zakharov E, Zimmitti G. Heterogeneity of management practices surrounding operable gallbladder cancer - results of the OMEGA-S international HPB surgical survey. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2006-2012. [PMID: 35922277 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive, uncommon malignancy, with variation in operative approaches adopted across centres and few large-scale studies to guide practice. We aimed to identify the extent of heterogeneity in GBC internationally to better inform the need for future multicentre studies. METHODS A 34-question online survey was disseminated to members of the European-African Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (EAHPBA), American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (AHPBA) and Asia-Pacific Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (A-PHPBA) regarding practices around diagnostic workup, operative approach, utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and surveillance strategies. RESULTS Two hundred and three surgeons responded from 51 countries. High liver resection volume units (>50 resections/year) organised HPB multidisciplinary team discussion of GBCs more commonly than those with low volumes (p < 0.0001). Management practices exhibited areas of heterogeneity, particularly around operative extent. Contrary to consensus guidelines, anatomical liver resections were favoured over non-anatomical resections for T3 tumours and above, lymphadenectomy extent was lower than recommended, and a minority of respondents still routinely excised the common bile duct or port sites. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest some similarities in the management of GBC internationally, but also specific areas of practice which differed from published guidelines. Transcontinental collaborative studies on GBC are necessary to establish evidence-based practice to minimise variation and optimise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul Gibbs
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J F Harper
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel L Huguet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong S Liau
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj K Praseedom
- Department of HPB Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Jose M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Avenida Pintor Baeza, 12 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | - Alejandro Branes
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hospital Sotero del Rio, Av. Concha y Toro 3459, Puente Alto, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Javier Lendoire
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Hospital Dr Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shishir Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322 USA
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of HPB Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salehi O, Vega EA, Mellado S, Core MJ, Li M, Kozyreva O, Kutlu OC, Freeman R, Conrad C. High-Quality Surgery for Gallbladder Carcinoma: Rare, Associated with Disparity, and Not Substitutable by Chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1241-1251. [PMID: 35396641 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05290-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologic surgery for T1b-T3 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) consists of gallbladder fossa resection or bisegmentectomy IVb/V with negative margins and portal/retropancreatic lymphadenectomy. Frequency of high quality oncologic surgery, factors associated with its use, and the ability of chemotherapy to rescue low-quality surgery (LQS) remain unknown. METHODS The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed with stage I-III (T1b-T3) GBC undergoing curative-intent surgery from 2004 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups based on receiving high quality surgery (HQS) or not; HQS was defined as cholecystectomy with partial hepatectomy, lymph node harvest ≥ 6, and negative margins. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 3796 patients met inclusion criteria; only 364 (9.6%) met HQS criteria, and 3432 (90.4%) did not achieve HQS and were deemed low-quality surgery (LQS). HQS was associated with improved median overall survival (55.1 vs. 25.5 months, P < .001). Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was not able to rescue LQS with poorer survival compared to HQS without AC (27.9 vs 55.1 months, P < .001). Factors associated with HQS included private insurance (OR 1.809, P < .001), higher income (OR 1.380, P = .038), urban/rural residence (vs metropolitan) (OR 1.641, P = .001), higher education (OR 1.342, P = .031), Medicaid expansion states (OR 1.405, P = .005), stage 3 GBC (OR 1.642, P = .020), and reresection (OR 2.685, P < .001). Factors associated with LQS included older age (OR 0.974, P < .001), comorbidities (OR 0.701, P = .004), and laparoscopic approach (0.579, P < .001). Facility type incrementally improved HQS rate (integrated cancer network vs. comprehensive community, 9.8% vs. 6.1%, OR 1.694, P = .003; academic/research center vs. integrated cancer network, 14.9% vs. 9.8%, OR 1.599, P = .003). CONCLUSION While HQS for GBC strongly improves survival, it is infrequently practiced. The newly identified factors that improve survival for GBC, such as centralization, open approach, and insurance coverage, are modifiable and, therefore, should be considered to achieve optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, Boston, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, Boston, MA, 02135, USA
| | | | - Michael J Core
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, Boston, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Mu Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Health System, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, Boston, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, Boston, MA, 02135, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Takahashi H, Irri A, Fenig Y, Byale A, Thung S, Gunasekaran G. Systematic review of squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder. Am J Surg 2022; 224:863-868. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
15
|
Zhu J, Wu Y, Xiao W, Li Y. Survival Predictors of Resectable Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Am Surg 2022:31348221074238. [PMID: 35061561 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221074238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background To analyze population-level data for resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Methods We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify all patients aged 18 years or older with T1-3 M0 GBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Multivariate cox hazard regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results Of the 1601 eligible patients, 1310 (81.8%) underwent cholecystectomy only and 291 (18.2%) underwent an en bloc resection. Overall, 219 (13.7%) patients were in stage I, 400 (25%) were in stage II, 260 (16.2%) were in stage IIIA, 653 (40.8%) were in stage IIIB, and 69 (4.3%) were in stage IVB. The 5-year survival rates for patients were 82.7% for stage I, 73.4% for stage II, 31.9% for stage IIIA, 24.1% for stage IIIB, and 10% for stage IVB. Multivariate cox analysis indicated that predictors of decreased CSS included age at diagnosis >65 years, tumor size >3.2 cm, adenocarcinoma, increasing tumor spread, and lymph node involvement. Besides, chemotherapy and radiation were predictors of increased CSS. Conclusions Older age, increasing tumor size, adenocarcinoma, and advanced tumor/node stage were associated with a poorer prognosis after resection for GBC. Furthermore, patients with resectable GBC can benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisheng Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yunxiang Wu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Weidong Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Papageorge MV, de Geus SWL, Woods AP, Ng SC, Drake FT, Merrill A, Cassidy MR, McAneny D, Tseng JF, Sachs TE. Lymphadenectomy in gallbladder adenocarcinoma: Are we doing enough? Am J Surg 2021; 224:423-428. [PMID: 34972539 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current AJCC guidelines recommend evaluating ≥6 lymph nodes during gallbladder cancer resection but real world data suggest this is rarely achieved. We evaluated the extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma. METHODS Patients with resected pT1b-T3 gallbladder adenocarcinoma were identified from the NCDB (2004-2017). Propensity scores were created for the odds of sufficient lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes), patients were matched 1:1 and survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Overall, 4760 patients were identified: 16.7% underwent sufficient lymphadenectomy, which was predictive of nodal disease (OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.51-2.08) and demonstrated a survival benefit in N0 (median OS 140.8 versus 44.4 months; p < 0.0001) and N1-2 disease (median OS 27.7 versus 17.7 months; p < 0.0001) after matching. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma do not undergo the recommended nodal dissection, resulting in a survival disadvantage, likely due to understaging, decisions regarding adjuvant therapy and local tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna V Papageorge
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alison P Woods
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - F Thurston Drake
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Merrill
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael R Cassidy
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David McAneny
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tschuor C, Pickens RC, Isenberg EE, Motz BM, Salibi PN, Robinson JN, Murphy KJ, Iannitti DA, Baker EH, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Robotic Resection of Gallbladder Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study to Open Resection. Am Surg 2021:31348211047491. [PMID: 34652250 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211047491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery is gaining support for resection of gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study aims to compare operative and early outcomes of robotic resection (RR) to open resection (OR) from a single institution performing a high volume of robotic HPB surgery. METHODS Twenty patients with GBC underwent RR from January 2013 to August 2019. Outcomes were compared to a historical control of 23 patients with OR. Radical cholecystectomy for suspected GBC and completion operations for incidental GBC after routine cholecystectomy were both included. RESULTS Robotic resection had lower blood loss compared to OR (150 vs 350 mL, P = .002) and shorter postoperative length of stay (2.5 vs 6 days, P < .001), while median operative time was similar (193 vs 208 min, P = .604). There were no statistical differences in 30-day major complications or readmissions. No 30-day mortalities occurred. There was no statistical difference in survival trend (P = .438) or median lymph node harvest (5 vs 3, P = .189) for RR compared to OR. CONCLUSION Robotic resection of GBC is safe and efficient, with lower length of hospital stay and blood loss compared to OR. Technical benefits of robotic-assisted surgery may prove advantageous though larger studies are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Tschuor
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.,Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, 53146Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, 4321University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ryan C Pickens
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Erin E Isenberg
- School of Medicine, 6797University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin M Motz
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Patrick N Salibi
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Jordan N Robinson
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Keith J Murphy
- Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David A Iannitti
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Erin H Baker
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Effect of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy Combined with Radical Surgery and Capecitabine on Stage III Gallbladder Cancer. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 2021:4006786. [PMID: 34660468 PMCID: PMC8519707 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4006786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with radical surgery and capecitabine on stage III gallbladder cancer. METHOD Seventy-eight patients with stage III gallbladder cancer treated in our hospital between December 2015 and April 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Depending on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into the control group (radical surgery and capecitabine) and the HIPEC group (hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy combined with radical surgery and capecitabine). The patients were followed up by outpatient or through telephone until April 1, 2020. SPSS 19.0 software was applied for data analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and parallel log-rank test. RESULTS There were 43 cases in the control group and 35 cases in the HIPEC group. There were no significant differences in operation time, lymph node metastasis, microvascular infiltration, and nerve invasion; there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The average hospitalization time of the HIPEC group was 23.0 ± 6.9 days, which was longer than the 20.0 ± 5.8 days of the control group (P < 0.05). The body temperatures of HIPEC group patients at 0 h and 6 h after operation were higher than those of patients in the control group (P < 0.05); however, the body temperature of the two groups gradually became the same at 12-24 h after operation. There was no liver and kidney damage in the two groups after surgery. The platelets in the HIPEC group were less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The median survival time of HIPEC was 19.2 months, which was longer than 15.3 months in the control group. The 1-year survival rates of the two groups were 91.43% vs. 76.71%, and the 2-year survival rates were 26.29% vs. 17.53%, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION HIPEC combined with radical surgery and capecitabine for stage III gallbladder cancer can effectively prolong survival time without increasing surgery-related complications.
Collapse
|
19
|
Choi SY, Kim JH, Lim S, Lee JE, Park HJ, Lee B. CT-based nomogram for predicting survival after R0 resection in patients with gallbladder cancer: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:3336-3346. [PMID: 33185751 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07402-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish a prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing R0 resection for gallbladder cancer based on preoperative CT. METHODS A total of 151 patients (64 males, 87 females; mean age, 73.26 years) with gallbladder cancer who underwent CT and surgery with margin-negative resection were retrospectively collected at two tertiary institutions. The demographic and radiologic parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify independent prognostic factors. The final CT-based nomogram was constructed to predict prognosis after curative resection of gallbladder cancer. Calibration curves for the survival probabilities were obtained for internal validation. RESULTS Mass-forming type (hazard ratio [HR], 28.80), bile duct invasion (HR, 4.76), duodenal invasion (HR, 6.32), colon invasion (HR, 4.37), gallstones (HR, 0.09), and cholecystitis (HR, 2.56) were significant independent predictors for recurrence-free survival (p < .05). Mass-forming type (HR, 8.16, p < .001), bile duct invasion (HR, 2.92, p = .013), duodenal invasion (HR, 3.72, p = .012), and regional lymph node metastasis (HR, 2.07, p = .043) were independent predictors of poor cancer-specific survival (CSS) and were used to construct the nomogram. The nomogram showed a good predictive ability for the probabilities of survival on the calibration curves, and the concordance index of the model in predicting CSS was .768. CONCLUSION Preoperative CT findings could predict the prognosis of gallbladder cancer, and the CT-based nomogram accurately predicted CSS in patients with gallbladder cancer after attempted curative resection. KEY POINTS • Among the preoperative imaging features, mass-forming type, bile duct invasion, duodenal invasion, and regional lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of poor cancer-specific survival. • The nomogram constructed using preoperative CT findings showed a good predictive ability for the survival on calibration curves, and the concordance index of the model in predicting cancer-specific survival was 0.768.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo-Youn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, 14584, South Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
| | - Sanghyeok Lim
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, 14584, South Korea
| | - Ji Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, 14584, South Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Park
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973, South Korea
| | - Bora Lee
- Institute of Public Health and Environment, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim WJ, Lim TW, Park PJ, Choi SB, Kim WB. Clinicopathological Differences in T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to Tumor Location. Cancer Control 2020; 27:1073274820915514. [PMID: 32233806 PMCID: PMC7133080 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820915514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to identify clinicopathological differences and factors affecting survival outcomes of stage T2a and T2b gallbladder cancer (GBC) and validate the oncological benefits of regional lymphadenectomy and hepatic resection in these patients. This single-center study enrolled patients who were diagnosed with pathologically confirmed T2 GBC and underwent curative resection between January 1995 and December 2017. Eighty-two patients with T2a and 50 with T2b GBCs were identified, and clinical information was retrospectively collected from medical records and analyzed. Five-year overall survival rates were 96.8% and 80.7% in T2a and T2b groups, respectively (P = .007). Three- and 5-year survival rates among all patients with T2 GBC without and with lymph node metastasis were 97.2% and 94.4% and 81.3% and 81.3%, respectively (P = .029). There was no difference in survival rates between the 2 groups according to whether hepatic resection was performed (P = .320). However, in the T2b group, those who underwent hepatic resection demonstrated a better survival rate than those who did not (P = .029). The T2b group had more multiple recurrence patterns than the T2a group, and the lymph nodes were the most common site in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and tumor location were significant independent prognostic factors. Hepatic resection was not always necessary in patients with peritoneal-side GBC. Considering clinicopathological features and recurrence patterns, a systematic treatment plan, including radical resection and adjuvant treatment, should be established for hepatic-side GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Joon Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Wan Lim
- Division of Transplantation Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Pyoung-Jae Park
- Division of Transplantation Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae-Byeol Choi
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan-Bae Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maegawa FB, Ashouri Y, Hamidi M, Hsu CH, Riall TS. Gallbladder Cancer Surgery in the United States: Lymphadenectomy Trends and Impact on Survival. J Surg Res 2020; 258:54-63. [PMID: 32992262 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer has a poor prognosis, and surgery is the only curative treatment. However, lymphadenectomy has been underperformed. We evaluate the trend of lymphadenectomy in the United States and its impact on survival. METHODS This is a cohort study of patients who underwent gallbladder cancer surgery between 2004 and 2016. Trend analysis of the rate of lymphadenectomy and the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed were examined. The impact of lymph node status and different LN staging systems on survival was examined. RESULTS Of the 4577 patients identified, 69.9% were female, the mean age was 71.0 (±12.4), 87.2% had ≥ T2, and only 50.3% (n = 2302) received lymphadenectomy. Although the rate of lymphadenectomy and the number of LNs removed increased during the study period, both with P < 0.0001, the rate of patients who received examination of ≥6 LNs remained low, 13.6% in 2016. Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients without LN examination had worse overall survival than patients with LN positive disease, HR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.22). Concordance index analysis revealed that LN ratio (LNR) and Log odds of positive LN (LODDS) did not improve the ability of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging in predicting 5-y survival rate. CONCLUSIONS Lack of LN examination is associated with worse survival than LN positive disease. Although the rate of LN examination and number of LNs retrieved have increased from 2004 to 2016, they remained low. LNR and LODDS staging systems added no benefit to AJCC staging ability in predicting a 5-y survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Boff Maegawa
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
| | - Yazan Ashouri
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | |
Collapse
|