1
|
Zensen S, Steinberg-Vorhoff HL, Milosevic A, Richly H, Siveke JT, Opitz M, Haubold J, Li Y, Forsting M, Schaarschmidt BM. Liver volumetry improves evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58:509-516. [PMID: 39608009 PMCID: PMC11604257 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In uveal melanoma patients, short-term evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria is challenging due to the diffuse metastatic spread. As liver enlargement can frequently be observed, this study aims to compare RECIST 1.1 and liver volumetry (LV) for the evaluation of HAIC treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Treatment response was evaluated in 143 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 10.9 years, 54% female) treated by HAIC by RECIST 1.1 and LV on CT imaging performed before and after HAIC. In LV, different increases in liver volume were evaluated to set an effective threshold to distinguish between stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time from first HAIC to patient death using Kaplan-Meier test and multivariate analysis was performed for RECIST 1.1 and LV. RESULTS In the overall population, median OS (mOS) was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.2-15.8 months). In LV, a threshold of 10% increase in liver volume was suited to identify patients with significantly reduced OS (SD: 103/143 patients, mOS 15.9 months; PD: 40/143 patients, 6.6 months; p < 0.001). Compared to RECIST 1.1, LV was the only significant prognostic factor that was able to identify a decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS In uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases, LV with a threshold for liver volume increase of 10% was suitable to evaluate treatment response and would be able to be used as a valuable add-on or even alternative to RECIST 1.1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zensen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Hannah L Steinberg-Vorhoff
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Aleksandar Milosevic
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Heike Richly
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens T Siveke
- Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Opitz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Yan Li
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Forsting
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koch EAT, Heppt MV, Berking C. The Current State of Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2024; 25:691-700. [PMID: 38907174 PMCID: PMC11358228 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00872-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiens L, Grözinger G, Dittmann H, Thiel K, Leiter U, Amaral T, Nanz L, Flatz L, Forschner A. Melanoma-specific survival of patients with uveal melanoma and liver metastases diagnosed between 2005 and 2021. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241273020. [PMID: 39184023 PMCID: PMC11342429 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241273020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. About half of the patients develop distant metastases, most commonly liver metastases (>90%). These are associated with poorer overall survival compared to patients with extrahepatic metastases. Patients and methods In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between January 2005 and December 2021 and treated at the Center for Dermato-oncology at the University of Tübingen, were included. The total cohort was divided into two groups. Group 1, in which the first diagnosis of metastasis was between 2005 and 2015 and group 2 with first metastasis between 2016 and 2021. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, test for differences was performed by the log-rank test. Results A total of 167 patients were included in the study. Since more than 90% of patients had developed liver metastases as their first site of metastasis, we focused our analysis on patients with liver metastases. Median MSS was 28 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (22.8-33.2 months)) in patients receiving first-line liver-directed therapy (n = 89) compared to 10 months (95% CI (8.4-11.6 months)) for patients with first-line systemic therapy (n = 45). The best MSS was found in patients of group 2 and liver-directed therapy as first-line treatment. Since survival with first-line liver-directed therapy was significantly better in group 2, subsequent systemic therapies must also be considered, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion This analysis revealed that MSS has improved significantly in recent years. In our analysis, first-line liver-directed therapy was associated with improved survival compared to first-line systemic therapy. Further studies are urgently needed, for example, to investigate the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition or tebentafusp with liver-specific procedures from the outset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Wiens
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Dittmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karolin Thiel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thorax Surgery, Oberschwabenklinik, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr, Germany
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr, Germany
| | - Lena Nanz
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr, Germany
| | - Lukas Flatz
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Suwajanakorn D, Lane AM, Go AK, Hartley CD, Oxenreiter M, Wu F, Gragoudas ES, Sullivan RJ, Montazeri K, Kim IK. Impact of gene expression profiling on diagnosis and survival after metastasis in patients with uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:319-325. [PMID: 38578293 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Surveillance frequency for metastasis is guided by gene expression profiling (GEP). This study evaluated the effect of GEP on time to diagnosis of metastasis, subsequent treatment and survival. A retrospective study was conducted of 110 uveal melanoma patients with GEP (DecisionDx-UM, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood, Texas, USA) and 110 American Joint Committee on Cancer-matched controls. Surveillance testing and treatment for metastasis were compared between the two groups and by GEP class. Rates of metastasis, overall survival and melanoma-related mortality were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Baseline characteristics and follow-up time were balanced in the two groups. Patients' GEP classification was 1A in 41%, 1B in 25.5% and 2 in 33.6%. Metastasis was diagnosed in 26.4% ( n = 29) in the GEP group and 23.6% ( n = 26) in the no GEP group ( P = 0.75). Median time to metastasis was 30.5 and 22.3 months in the GEP and no GEP groups, respectively ( P = 0.44). Median months to metastasis were 34.7, 75.8 and 26.1 in class 1A, 1B and 2 patients, respectively ( P = 0.28). Disease-specific 5-year survival rates were 89.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 81.0-94.2%] and 84.1% (95% CI: 74.9-90.1%) in the GEP and no GEP groups respectively ( P = 0.49). Median time to death from metastasis was 10.1 months in the GEP group and 8.5 months in the no GEP group ( P = 0.40). There were no significant differences in time to metastasis diagnosis and survival outcomes in patients with and without GEP. To realize the full benefit of GEP, more sensitive techniques for detection of metastasis and adjuvant therapies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Suwajanakorn
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Center of Excellence in Retina, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - A M Lane
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - A K Go
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - C D Hartley
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Current address: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - M Oxenreiter
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Close Concerns, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - F Wu
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - E S Gragoudas
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R J Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - K Montazeri
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - I K Kim
- Ocular Melanoma Center, Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tran DH, Shanley R, Giubellino A, Tang PH, Koozekanani DD, Yuan J, Dusenbery K, Domingo-Musibay E. Radiation and systemic immunotherapy for metastatic uveal melanoma: a clinical retrospective review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1406872. [PMID: 39026970 PMCID: PMC11254688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1406872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a difficult to treat disease. The liver is the primary site of metastasis in most patients, though uveal melanoma spreads widely in advanced disease. The only FDA approved immunotherapy medication for metastatic uveal melanoma is the HLA-A02:01 restricted bispecific T cell engager drug, Tebentafusp. Checkpoint inhibitor strategies and combination approaches have been tried with some limited success. We describe our experience treating patients at the University of Minnesota. Methods Patients were included if they had biopsy-confirmed mUM. Twenty-five (25) patients meeting the criteria were identified. Medical records were reviewed and data extracted for patient baseline characteristics and response to treatments. Results Median time to metastasis from the time of local therapy to the eye was 14.2 months (IQR; 9.3-22.0), and first site of metastasis was liver in 92% of patients. Two patients (8%) did not receive systemic therapy or radiation therapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-three (92%) patients received systemic therapy, 13 patients (52%) received ipilimumab-nivolumab as the first-line, while 4 patients (16%) received pembrolizumab. Landmark survival analysis by receipt of systemic therapy and radiation therapy treatments within 6 months of biopsy confirmed diagnosis is shown. Twenty patients (80%) received systemic therapy within 6 months of mUM diagnosis. Thirteen patients (52%) received liver directed radiation therapy within 6 months of mUM diagnosis. Discussion Within our cohort, there was no overall survival benefit for patients receiving treatment of metastatic disease within 6 months of mUM diagnosis, versus those electing later or no treatment at all. There was remarkable clinical activity of ipilimumab and nivolumab in a subset of patients with mUM, in agreement with prior studies, and metastatic PD-L1 positive tumors were associated with a prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle H. Tran
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Ryan Shanley
- Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Alessio Giubellino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Peter H. Tang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Dara D. Koozekanani
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Jianling Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Kathryn Dusenbery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Evidio Domingo-Musibay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Department of Medical Oncology, Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Unguryan VM, Kazantsev AN, Korotkikh AV, Ivanov SA, Belov YV, Kaprin AD. Isolated liver chemo perfusion for hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma: a report of 38 cases. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 40:198-204. [PMID: 38389773 PMCID: PMC10879073 DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01620-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the outcomes of isolated liver chemo perfusion in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma. Materials and methods Cardiovascular surgeons are often involved in the treatment of oncological diseases. Isolated liver chemoperfusion requires the use a heart-lung machine. A little more than 300 operations of isolated liver chemoperfusion have been performed worldwide. From 2020 to 2023, 38 cases of isolated liver chemoperfusion were performed at the Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary. Results There were 3 deaths, 2 due to liver failure. The remaining patient had hepatic artery thrombosis, who despite emergency thrombectomy and repair of common hepatic artery succumbed to multiorgan failure. Bleeding was diagnosed in 7 patients in the postoperative period. In all cases, relaparotomy was performed to stop bleeding. Subsequently, no special features were noted. The median disease-free survival was 5.4 months. The median overall survival was 20.3 months at the time of submission of this manuscript. Conclusions Isolated liver chemoperfusion is a safe method of regional chemotherapy and can be considered in patients with isolated hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01620-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir M. Unguryan
- Kostroma Oncological Dispensary- Russian Federation, Kostroma, Kostroma Region Russian Federation
| | - Anton N. Kazantsev
- Kostroma Oncological Dispensary- Russian Federation, Kostroma, Kostroma Region Russian Federation
- Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital named after Korolev E.I., Kostroma, Russian Federation
| | - Alexander V. Korotkikh
- Clinic of Cardiac Surgery of the Amur State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation
| | - Sergey A. Ivanov
- MRNC im. A. F. Tsyba - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Obninsk, Russian Federation
| | - Yury V. Belov
- Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky, Moscow, Russian Federation
- First Moscow State Medical University. THEM. Sechenov, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Andrey D. Kaprin
- MNIOI them. P.A. Hercena - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kennedy S, Owens S, Ivers L, Hegarty C, O'Neill V, Berenguer-Pina JJ, Horgan N, Crown J, Walsh N. Prognostic Value of BAP1 Protein Expression in Uveal Melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2024; 48:329-336. [PMID: 38238977 PMCID: PMC10876168 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
The prognostic value of the traditional pathologic parameters that form part of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and genetic classifications using monosomy chromosome 3 and structural alterations in chromosome 8 are well established and are part of the diagnostic workup of uveal melanoma (UM). However, it has not been fully clarified whether nuclear protein expression of the tumor suppressor gene BAP1 (nBAP1) by immunohistochemistry alone is as powerful a predictor of overall survival (OS) and/or disease-specific survival (DSS) as chromosome analysis. The protein expression of nBAP1 was evaluated in a retrospective cohort study of 308 consecutive patients treated by primary enucleation between January 1974 and December 2022. We correlated clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic characteristics to identify the best prognostic indicators for OS and DSS. Loss of nBAP1 was detected in 144/308 (47%) of patients. Loss of nBAP1 expression was significantly associated with poor survival. In patients with disomy chromosome 3, nBAP1 negative is significantly associated with poorer OS but not DSS. We observed that older age (>63 years), presence of metastasis, and nBAP1 negative remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. nBAP1 protein expression proved to be a more reliable prognostic indicator for OS than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, M3 status, or The Cancer Genome Atlas classification in this cohort. This study provides support for accurate prognostication of UM patients in routine histology laboratories by immunohistochemistry for nBAP1 alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Kennedy
- National Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory & Research Foundation, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
| | - Sally Owens
- National Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory & Research Foundation, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
| | - Laura Ivers
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
| | - Ciara Hegarty
- National Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory & Research Foundation, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
| | - Valerie O'Neill
- National Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory & Research Foundation, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
| | | | - Noel Horgan
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Research Foundation Royal Victoria Eye & Ear Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Crown
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital
| | - Naomi Walsh
- School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Synoradzki KJ, Paduszyńska N, Solnik M, Toro MD, Bilmin K, Bylina E, Rutkowski P, Yousef YA, Bucolo C, Zweifel SA, Reibaldi M, Fiedorowicz M, Czarnecka AM. From Molecular Biology to Novel Immunotherapies and Nanomedicine in Uveal Melanoma. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:778-800. [PMID: 38392052 PMCID: PMC10887618 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular biology studies of uveal melanoma have resulted in the development of novel immunotherapy approaches including tebentafusp-a T cell-redirecting bispecific fusion protein. More biomarkers are currently being studied. As a result, combined immunotherapy is being developed as well as immunotherapy with bifunctional checkpoint inhibitory T cell engagers and natural killer cells. Current trials cover tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), vaccination with IKKb-matured dendritic cells, or autologous dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor RNA. Another potential approach to treat UM could be based on T cell receptor engineering rather than antibody modification. Immune-mobilizing monoclonal T cell receptors (TCR) against cancer, called ImmTAC TM molecules, represent such an approach. Moreover, nanomedicine, especially miRNA approaches, are promising for future trials. Finally, theranostic radiopharmaceuticals enabling diagnosis and therapy with the same molecule bring hope to this research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil J. Synoradzki
- Environmental Laboratory of Pharmacological and Toxicological Research, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Natalia Paduszyńska
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (N.P.); (M.S.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Malgorzata Solnik
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (N.P.); (M.S.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Mario Damiano Toro
- Chair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chmielna Str., 20-079 Lublin, Poland;
- Eye Clinic, Public Health Department, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Krzysztof Bilmin
- Research and Development Centre Novasome Sp. z o.o., 51-423 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Elżbieta Bylina
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
- Department of Clinical Trials, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Yacoub A. Yousef
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman 11941, Jordan;
| | - Claudio Bucolo
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Sandrine Anne Zweifel
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Faculty of Human Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin University, 10122 Turin, Italy;
| | - Michal Fiedorowicz
- Small Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang HW, Huang DL, Wang YR, Zhong HS, Pang HW. CT radiomics based on different machine learning models for classifying gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:20. [PMID: 38279133 PMCID: PMC10811872 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00652-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The present study utilized extracted computed tomography radiomics features to classify the gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma by mainstream machine learning methods, aiming to establish an automatic classification model. METHODS We recruited 104 pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma patients for this study. GTV and normal liver tissue samples were manually segmented into regions of interest and randomly divided into five-fold cross-validation groups. Dimensionality reduction using LASSO regression. Radiomics models were constructed via logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, Xgboost, and Adaboost algorithms. The diagnostic efficacy, discrimination, and calibration of algorithms were verified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses and calibration plot comparison. RESULTS Seven screened radiomics features excelled at distinguishing the gross tumor area. The Xgboost machine learning algorithm had the best discrimination and comprehensive diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9975 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9973-0.9978] and mean MCC of 0.9369. SVM had the second best discrimination and diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9846 (95% CI: 0.9835- 0.9857), mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC)of 0.9105, and a better calibration. All other algorithms showed an excellent ability to distinguish between gross tumor area and normal liver tissue (mean AUC 0.9825, 0.9861,0.9727,0.9644 for Adaboost, random forest, logistic regression, naivem Bayes algorithm respectively). CONCLUSION CT radiomics based on machine learning algorithms can accurately classify GTV and normal liver tissue, while the Xgboost and SVM algorithms served as the best complementary algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huai-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 330029, Nanchang, China
- Department of Oncology, The third people's hospital of Jingdezhen, The third people's hospital of Jingdezhen affiliated to Nanchang Medical College, 333000, Jingdezhen, China
| | - De-Long Huang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China
| | - Yi-Ren Wang
- School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China
| | - Hao-Shu Zhong
- Department of Hematology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 200040, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hao-Wen Pang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boshell D, Bester L. Radioembolisation of liver metastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:842-852. [PMID: 37343147 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
This review aims to present contemporary data for SIRT in the treatment of secondary hepatic malignancies including colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast and uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Boshell
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lourens Bester
- Department of Radiology, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tong TML, Bastiaannet E, Speetjens FM, Blank CU, Luyten GPM, Jager MJ, Marinkovic M, Vu THK, Rasch CRN, Creutzberg CL, Beenakker JWM, Hartgrink HH, Bosch JJJ, Kiliç E, Naus NC, Yavuzyigitoglu S, van Rij CM, Burgmans MC, Kapiteijn EHW. Time Trends in the Treatment and Survival of 5036 Uveal Melanoma Patients in The Netherlands over a 30-Year Period. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5419. [PMID: 38001679 PMCID: PMC10670516 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare intraocular tumor with a dismal prognosis once metastasized. This study provides a nationwide overview and time trends of patients diagnosed with primary UM in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2019. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study based on patients with primary UM from the database of the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), linked with the national population registry Statistics Netherlands on inhabitants' cause of death. Two time periods (1989-2004, 2005-2019) were compared with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier and (multivariate) Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess changes over time for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS In total, 5036 patients were analyzed with a median age of 64.0 years at the time of diagnosis. The number of patients increased over time. In the first (1989-2004) and second (2005-2019) period, 32% versus 54% of the patients received radiotherapy (p < 0.001). The median FU time was 13.4 years. The median OS of the first and second periods was 9.5 (95% CI 8.7-10.3) versus 11.3 years (95% CI 10.3-12.3; p < 0.001). The median CSS was 30.0 years (95% CI NA) in the first period and not reached in the second period (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis (MVA), female gender (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.92, p < 0.001) and radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64-0.83, p < 0.001) were associated with better OS. Radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90, p = 0.002) was also associated with better CSS. The period of diagnosis was not associated with OS or CSS. CONCLUSIONS In this study of patients with primary UM, there was a shift to the diagnosis of smaller tumors, possibly due to stage migration. There was also an increase in eye-preserving treatments over time. OS and CSS were modestly improved in the second time period; however, the time period was not associated with OS or CSS in multivariate analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs M. L. Tong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Frank M. Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian U. Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P. M. Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T. H. Khanh Vu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R. N. Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L. Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus J. J. Bosch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C. Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M. van Rij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen H. W. Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Eckstein M, Gesierich A, Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Knorr H, Kreuzberg N, Leiter U, Loquai C, Meier F, Meissner M, Mohr P, Pföhler C, Rahimi F, Schadendorf D, Schlaak M, Thoms KM, Ugurel S, Utikal J, Weichenthal M, Schuler-Thurner B, Berking C, Heppt MV. Liver-directed treatment is associated with improved survival and increased response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic uveal melanoma: results from a retrospective multicenter trial. Front Med 2023; 17:878-888. [PMID: 37432641 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-023-0993-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Metastases of uveal melanoma (UM) spread predominantly to the liver. Due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for tumor control. The impact of LDT on the response to systemic treatment is unknown. A total of 182 patients with metastatic UM treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from prospective skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Two cohorts were compared: patients with LDT (cohort A, n = 78) versus those without LDT (cohort B, n = 104). Data were analyzed for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The median OS was significantly longer in cohort A than in cohort B (20.1 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0016) and a trend towards improved PFS was observed for cohort A (3.0 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.054). The objective response rate to any ICB (16.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.0073) and combined ICB (14.1% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017) was more favorable in cohort A. Our data suggest that the combination of LDT with ICB may be associated with a survival benefit and higher treatment response to ICB in patients with metastatic UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, 67059, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Minden, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken AöR, Ruhr University, Bochum Campus Minden, 32423, Minden, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center at the Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72056, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases & Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbeklinikum, 21614, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, and DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pašalić D, Nikuševa-Martić T, Sekovanić A, Kaštelan S. Genetic and Epigenetic Features of Uveal Melanoma-An Overview and Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12807. [PMID: 37628989 PMCID: PMC10454135 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is rare, but it is the most common primary intraocular malignancy among adults. This review represents the molecular, genetic, and immunobiological mechanisms involved in UM carcinogenesis and progression, as well as data about the association of chromosomal changes, genetic mutations, selective proteins, and biochemical biomarkers with the clinical implications of UM. Genetic analysis has the potential to identify patients with a high risk of UM metastasis, enabling management that is more effective and allowing for the follow-up of patients. Advancements in molecular characterization of UM offer opportunities to develop targeted therapeutic strategies by focusing on relevant signaling pathways. Changes in miRNA expression could be useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of UM, due to unique miRNA profiles in melanoma cells or tissue and its association with metastasis. Although liver function tests do not provide enough data on the prognosis of UM, due to the high frequency of liver metastasis, liver function tests (LFTs) might be useful indicators; however, the absence of rising LFT values cannot lead to the exclusion of liver metastases. Molecular analysis of tumor tissue will allow us to identify patients with the added benefit of new therapeutic agents and provide a better insight into melanoma pathogenesis and its biological behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Pašalić
- Department of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Tamara Nikuševa-Martić
- Department of Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ankica Sekovanić
- Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Snježana Kaštelan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
- Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Richards JR, Shin D, Pryor R, Sorensen LK, Sun Z, So WM, Park G, Wolff R, Truong A, McMahon M, Grossmann AH, Harbour JW, Zhu W, Odelberg SJ, Yoo JH. Activation of NFAT by HGF and IGF-1 via ARF6 and its effector ASAP1 promotes uveal melanoma metastasis. Oncogene 2023; 42:2629-2640. [PMID: 37500798 PMCID: PMC11008337 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02792-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Preventing or effectively treating metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) is critical because it occurs in about half of patients and confers a very poor prognosis. There is emerging evidence that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) promote metastasis and contribute to the striking metastatic hepatotropism observed in UM metastasis. However, the molecular mechanisms by which HGF and IGF-1 promote UM liver metastasis have not been elucidated. ASAP1, which acts as an effector for the small GTPase ARF6, is highly expressed in the subset of uveal melanomas most likely to metastasize. Here, we found that HGF and IGF-1 hyperactivate ARF6, leading to its interaction with ASAP1, which then acts as an effector to induce nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of NFAT1. Inhibition of any component of this pathway impairs cellular invasiveness. Additionally, knocking down ASAP1 or inhibiting NFAT signaling reduces metastasis in a xenograft mouse model of UM. The discovery of this signaling pathway represents not only an advancement in our understanding of the biology of uveal melanoma metastasis but also identifies a novel pathway that could be targeted to treat or prevent metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson R Richards
- Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Donghan Shin
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Rob Pryor
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Lise K Sorensen
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Zhonglou Sun
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Won Mi So
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Garam Park
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Roger Wolff
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Amanda Truong
- Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Martin McMahon
- Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Allie H Grossmann
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 15 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - J William Harbour
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Weiquan Zhu
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Shannon J Odelberg
- Department of Medicine, Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Utah, 15 North 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Utah, 20 South 2030 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Jae Hyuk Yoo
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Truhlsen Eye Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang Y, Xie M, Lin F, Sheng X, Zhao X, Zhu X, Wang Y, Lu B, Chen J, Zhang T, Wan X, Liu W, Sun X. Nomogram of uveal melanoma as prediction model of metastasis risk. Heliyon 2023; 9:e18956. [PMID: 37609406 PMCID: PMC10440531 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Since the poor prognosis of uveal melanoma with distant metastasis, we intended to screen out possible biomarkers for uveal melanoma metastasis risk and establish a nomogram model for predicting the risk of uveal melanoma (UVM) metastasis. Methods Two datasets of UVM (GSE84976, GSE22138) were selected. Data was analyzed by R language, CTD database and GEPIA. Results The co-upregulated genes of two datasets, HTR2B, CHAC1, AHNAK2, and PTP4A3 were identified using a Venn diagram. These biomarkers are combined with clinical characteristics, and Lasso regression was conducted to filter the metastasis-related biomarkers. HTR2B, CHAC1, AHNAK2, PTP4A3, tumor thickness, and retinal detachment (RD) were selected to establish the nomogram. Conclusion Our study provides a comprehensive predictive model and personalized risk estimation tool for assessment of 3-year metastasis risk of UVM with a better accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yimin Wang
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minyue Xie
- Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | - Feng Lin
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, China
| | - Xiaonan Sheng
- Department of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Xiaohuan Zhao
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Xinyue Zhu
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Yuwei Wang
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Bing Lu
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Jieqiong Chen
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Ting Zhang
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
| | - Xiaoling Wan
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
| | - Wenjia Liu
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| | - Xiaodong Sun
- Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Eye Disease, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, China
- Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sajan A, Fordyce S, Sideris A, Liou C, Toor Z, Filtes J, Krishnasamy V, Ahmad N, Reis S, Brejt S, Baig A, Khan S, Caplan M, Sperling D, Weintraub J. Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Hepatic Uveal Melanoma Metastases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111836. [PMID: 37296688 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is one of the most common primary intraocular malignancies that accounts for about 85% of all ocular melanomas. The pathophysiology of uveal melanoma is distinct from cutaneous melanoma and has separate tumor profiles. The management of uveal melanoma is largely dependent on the presence of metastases, which confers a poor prognosis with a one-year survival reaching only 15%. Although a better understanding of tumor biology has led to the development of novel pharmacologic agents, there is increasing demand for minimally invasive management of hepatic uveal melanoma metastases. Multiple studies have already summarized the systemic therapeutic options available for metastatic uveal melanoma. This review covers the current research for the most prevalent locoregional treatment options for metastatic uveal melanoma including percutaneous hepatic perfusion, immunoembolization, chemoembolization, thermal ablation, and radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abin Sajan
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Samuel Fordyce
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Andrew Sideris
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Connie Liou
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Zeeshan Toor
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - John Filtes
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Venkatesh Krishnasamy
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Noor Ahmad
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Stephen Reis
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Sidney Brejt
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Asad Baig
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Shaheer Khan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael Caplan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - David Sperling
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Joshua Weintraub
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vanaken L, Woei-A-Jin FJSH, Van Ginderdeuren R, Deroose CM, Laenen A, Missotten G, Thal DR, Bechter O, Schöffski P, Clement P. Role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Acta Oncol 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37200223 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2211206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma is an orphan malignancy with very limited data on treatment options in metastatic setting. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we describe real-world epidemiological and survival data on 121 metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients registered in our institution. As a large tertiary referral center, almost 30% of all diagnoses in the Flemish region of Belgium were covered. Primarily, we determined whether introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) led to improved overall survival (OS) in MUM patients. Secondarily, response rates to ICI were assessed and we evaluated whether first-line ICI could be a valid alternative to liver-directed therapy (LDT) in liver-only disease. RESULTS The initially perceived 10.8 months survival benefit from treatment with ICI disappeared after correction for immortality bias. By analyzing treatment type as time-varying covariate on OS, no significant benefit of ICI over other systemic therapies (HR = 0.771) or best supportive care (BSC) (HR = 0.780) was found. Also comparison of the pre-ICI versus ICI era showed no OS improvement after introduction of ICI in our center (p = 0.7994). Only liver-directed and local oligometastatic approaches were associated with a lower chance of mortality when compared to ICI (p = 0.0025), other systemic therapies (p = 0.0001) and BSC (p = 0.0003), yet without correction for selection bias. We reported overall response rates on ICI ranging from 8-15% and we found some support for neoadjuvant strategies with ICI resulting in remission or downsizing, allowing oligometastatic approaches later on. In first-line liver-only disease, median real-world progression-free survival and OS did not significantly differ between patients treated with LDT or ICI upfront (p = 0.2930 and p = 0.5461 respectively). CONCLUSION Although we documented responses to ICI, our analyses do not demonstrate an OS benefit of ICI over alternative treatment strategies for MUM. However, local treatment options, whether liver-directed or for oligometastatic disease, may be beneficial and should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lize Vanaken
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Rita Van Ginderdeuren
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Annouschka Laenen
- Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Missotten
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dietmar R Thal
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Neuropathology, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Leuven Brain Institute, KU-Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Oliver Bechter
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Schöffski
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul Clement
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Combining Melphalan Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: First Safety and Efficacy Data from the Phase Ib Part of the Chopin Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:350-359. [PMID: 36624292 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03338-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To define a safe treatment dose of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) when applied in combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (NCT04283890), primary objective was defining a safe treatment dose of IPI/NIVO plus M-PHP. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03). Secondary objective was response rate, PFS and OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients between 18-75 years with confirmed measurable hepatic mUM according to RECIST 1.1 and WHO performance score 0-1 were included. Intravenous IPI was applied at 1 mg/kg while NIVO dose was increased from 1 mg/kg in cohort 1 to 3 mg/kg in cohort 2. Transarterial melphalan dose for M-PHP was 3 mg/kg (maximum of 220 mg) in both cohorts. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, consisting of four 3-weekly courses IPI/NIVO and two 6-weekly M-PHPs. RESULTS Seven patients were included with a median age of 63.6 years (range 50-74). Both dose levels were well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were observed in 2/3 patients in cohort 1 and in 3/4 patients in cohort 2, including Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), febrile neutropenia and cholecystitis. Grade I/II immune-related AEs occurred in all patients, including myositis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis and dermatitis. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The safe IPI/NIVO dose was defined as IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg. There was 1 complete response, 5 partial responses and 1 stable disease (3 ongoing responses with a median FU of 29.1 months). CONCLUSION Combining M-PHP with IPI/NIVO was safe in this small cohort of patients with mUM at a dose of IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg.
Collapse
|
19
|
Trivedi DB, Aldulaimi N, Karydis I, Wheater M, Modi S, Stedman B, Karavias D, Primrose J, Pearce N, Takhar AS. Liver resection for metastatic uveal melanoma: experience from a supra-regional centre and review of literature. Melanoma Res 2023; 33:71-79. [PMID: 36409208 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma (LMUM) requires multimodal approach. This study describes evolution of liver resection for LMUM, reviewing current literature and institutional outcomes. Records of patients referred to the Melanoma Multi-Disciplinary Team between February 2005 and August 2018 were reviewed. All publications describing surgery for LMUM were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Thirty-one of 147 patients with LMUM underwent laparoscopic liver biopsy, and 29 (14 females) had liver resections. Nineteen liver resections were performed locally [7 major (≥3 seg), 14 laparoscopic] without major complications or mortality. Overall survival positively correlated with the time from uveal melanoma to LMUM (Spearman's rho rs = 0.859, P < 0.0001). Overall and recurrence-free survivals were comparable following R1 or R0 resections (OS 25 vs. 28 months, P = 0.404; RFS 13 vs. 6 months, P = 0.596). R1 resection cohort had longer lead-time (median 100 vs. 24 months, P = 0.0408). Eleven publications describing liver resection for LMUM were identified and included in the narrative review. Surgery for LMUM is safe and complements multidisciplinary management. Despite heterogeneity in literature, time from diagnosis of uveal melanoma to LMUM remains a key factor affecting survival after liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharmadev B Trivedi
- Department of General Surgery, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, Warwickshire
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Natasha Aldulaimi
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Ioannis Karydis
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Matthew Wheater
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Sachin Modi
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Brian Stedman
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Dimitrios Karavias
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - John Primrose
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Neil Pearce
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Arjun S Takhar
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carvajal RD, Sacco JJ, Jager MJ, Eschelman DJ, Olofsson Bagge R, Harbour JW, Chieng ND, Patel SP, Joshua AM, Piperno-Neumann S. Advances in the clinical management of uveal melanoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:99-115. [PMID: 36600005 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00714-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Melanomas arising in the uveal tract of the eye are a rare form of the disease with a biology and clinical phenotype distinct from their more common cutaneous counterparts. Treatment of primary uveal melanoma with radiotherapy, enucleation or other modalities achieves local control in more than 90% of patients, although 40% or more ultimately develop distant metastases, most commonly in the liver. Until January 2022, no systemic therapy had received regulatory approval for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, and these patients have historically had a dismal prognosis owing to the limited efficacy of the available treatments. A series of seminal studies over the past two decades have identified highly prevalent early, tumour-initiating oncogenic genomic aberrations, later recurring prognostic alterations and immunological features that characterize uveal melanoma. These advances have driven the development of a number of novel emerging treatments, including tebentafusp, the first systemic therapy to achieve regulatory approval for this disease. In this Review, our multidisciplinary and international group of authors summarize the biology of uveal melanoma, management of primary disease and surveillance strategies to detect recurrent disease, and then focus on the current standard and emerging regional and systemic treatment approaches for metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Carvajal
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Joseph J Sacco
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Martine J Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David J Eschelman
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - J William Harbour
- Department of Ophthalmology and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas D Chieng
- Medical Imaging Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hepatic Radiotherapy in Addition to Anti-PD-1 for the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020493. [PMID: 36672442 PMCID: PMC9857311 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common ocular tumor with frequent metastatic spread to the liver. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated poor results in this disease. The addition of hepatic radiotherapy to anti-PD-1 could enhance the sensitivity to immunotherapy. In this study, patients treated with pembrolizumab and who have undergone hepatic radiotherapy have been retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-two patients have been considered. Six patients (27.3%) achieved a partial response and 3 (13.6%) a stable disease. Disease control rate was 40.9%. Thirteen patients (59.1%) had progression as best response. The median PFS was 4.8 months and 6 months PFS rate 45.4%. The median OS was 21.2 months, while 1 year OS rate was 72.7%. Longer survival was observed in patients who achieved a partial response on irradiated metastases (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83) or progressed after 6 months (HR 0.12-95% CI 0.03-0.44). No radiotherapy-related or grade 3-4 adverse events were reported. This study demonstrates that the addition of hepatic radiotherapy to anti-PD-1 treatment can be a valid option for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma, particularly for HLA A 02:01 negative patients. Prospective studies should be conducted to confirm these data.
Collapse
|
22
|
Spiliopoulou P, Vornicova O, Genta S, Spreafico A. Shaping the Future of Immunotherapy Targets and Biomarkers in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Cutaneous Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:1294. [PMID: 36674809 PMCID: PMC9862040 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in treating cutaneous melanoma have resulted in impressive patient survival gains. Refinement of disease staging and accurate patient risk classification have significantly improved our prognostic knowledge and ability to accurately stratify treatment. Undoubtedly, the most important step towards optimizing patient outcomes has been the advent of cancer immunotherapy, in the form of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Immunotherapy has established its cardinal role in the management of both early and late-stage melanoma. Through leveraging outcomes in melanoma, immunotherapy has also extended its benefit to other types of skin cancers. In this review, we endeavor to summarize the current role of immunotherapy in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, highlight the most pertinent immunotherapy-related molecular biomarkers, and lastly, shed light on future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlina Spiliopoulou
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Olga Vornicova
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Sofia Genta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang W, Zhao H, Wang S. Identification of a novel immune-related gene signature for prognosis and the tumor microenvironment in patients with uveal melanoma combining single-cell and bulk sequencing data. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1099071. [PMID: 36793711 PMCID: PMC9922847 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1099071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Uveal melanoma (UVM) is the most invasive intraocular malignancy in adults with a poor prognosis. Growing evidence revealed that immune-related gene is related to tumorigenesis and prognosis. This study aimed to construct an immune-related prognostic signature for UVM and clarify the molecular and immune classification. Methods Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, single-sample gene set enrichment (ssGSEA) and hierarchical clustering analysis were performed to identify the immune infiltration pattern of UVM and classify patients into two immunity clusters. Then, we proposed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify immune-related genes that related to overall survival (OS) and validated in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) external validation cohort. The molecular and immune classification in the immune-related gene prognostic signature defined subgroups were analyzed. Results The immune-related gene prognostic signature was constructed based on S100A13, MMP9, and SEMA3B genes. The prognostic value of this risk model was validated in three bulk RNA sequencing datasets and one single-cell sequencing dataset. Patients in the low-risk group had better OS than those in the high-risk group. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed its strong predictive ability for UVM patients. Lower expression of immune checkpoint genes was presented in the low-risk group. Functional studies showed that S100A13 knockdown via siRNA inhibited UVM cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, with the increased expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) related markers in UVM cell lines. Discussion The immune-related gene prognostic signature is an independent predictive factor for the survival of patients with UVM and provides new information about cancer immunotherapy in UVM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanpeng Wang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hunan, Changsha, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Han Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sha Wang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hunan, Changsha, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Prognostic Hematologic Biomarkers Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235789. [PMID: 36497270 PMCID: PMC9738244 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is no standardized treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) but immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used. While ICI has transformed the survival of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, MUM patients do not equally benefit. Factors known to affect ICI response include the hematologic markers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We evaluated the prognostic value of LDH and NLR at the start of ICI and on treatment in MUM. Methods: MUM patients were treated between August 2006 and May 2022 with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab/pembrolizumab single-agent therapy. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses were used to assess the prognostic value of predefined baseline factors on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In forty-six patients with MUM treated with ICI, elevated baseline and on-treatment LDH was prognostic for OS (start of ICI, HR (95% CI): 3.6 (1.9−7.0), p < 0.01; on-treatment, HR (95% CI): 3.7 (1.6−8.8), p < 0.01) and PFS (start of ICI, (HR (95% CI): 2.8 (1.5−5.4), p < 0.0001); on-treatment LDH (HR (95% CI): 2.2 (1.1−4.3), p < 0.01). On-treatment NLR was prognostic for PFS (HR (95% CI): 1.9 (1.0−3.9), p < 0.01). On-treatment LDH remained an important contributor to survival on MVA (OS: HR (95% CI): 1.001 (1.00−1.002), p < 0.05); PFS: HR (95% CI): 1.001 (1.00−1.002), p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that LDH and NLR could be useful in the prognostication of MUM patients treated with ICI. Additional studies are needed to confirm the importance of these and other prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
|
25
|
L1CAM and laminin vascular network: Association with the high-risk replacement histopathologic growth pattern in uveal melanoma liver metastases. J Transl Med 2022; 102:1214-1224. [PMID: 36775447 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-022-00803-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The replacement histopathologic growth pattern (rHGP) in melanoma liver metastases connotes an aggressive phenotype (vascular co-option; angiotropic extravascular migratory spread) and adverse prognosis. Herein, replacement and desmoplastic HGP (dHGP) were studied in uveal melanoma liver metastases (MUM). In particular, L1CAM and a "laminin vascular network" were detected at the advancing front of 14/20 cases (p = 0.014) and 16/20 cases (p = 6.4e-05) rHGPs, respectively, but both were absent in the dHGP (8/8 cases) (p = 0.014, and p = 6.3e-05, respectively). L1CAM highlighted progressive extension of angiotropic melanoma cells along sinusoidal vessels in a pericytic location (pericytic mimicry) into the hepatic parenchyma. An inverse relationship between L1CAM expression and melanin index (p = 0.012) suggested differentiation toward an amelanotic embryonic migratory phenotype in rHGP. Laminin labeled the basement membrane zone interposed between sinusoidal vascular channels and angiotropic melanoma cells at the advancing front. Other new findings: any percentage of rHGP and pure rHGP had a significant adverse effect on metastasis-specific overall survival (p = 0.038; p = 0.0064), as well as predominant rHGP (p = 0.0058). Pure rHGP also was associated with diminished metastasis-free survival relative to dHGP (p = 0.040), possibly having important implications for mechanisms of tumor spread. In conclusion, we report for the first time that L1CAM and a laminin vascular network are directly involved in this high-risk replacement phenotype. Further, this study provides more detailed information about the adverse prognostic effect of the rHGP in MUM.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen G, Jiao D, Peng S, Chen X, Zhang Y, Lin L, Zhong Z, Li Y, Xu K, Zhang F. Peritumoral abnormalities on dynamic-enhanced CT after brachytherapy for hepatic malignancies: local progression or benign changes? Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7307-7319. [PMID: 35980429 PMCID: PMC9474341 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09074-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To determine if dynamic CT can differentiate local progression from radioactive seed-induced peritumoral reaction (RSIPR) after brachytherapy with iodine-125 radioactive seeds (BIRS) for advanced hepatic malignancies. Methods Enhanced CT images of seed-implanted lesions between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Hounsfield units of peritumoral parenchyma were measured and assessed quantitatively. The classification, conversion, consequences, and serological indicators during follow-up were recorded and quantified. Statistical differences were analyzed using a Pearson χ2 test. Results RSIPR was observed in 201 of 290 (69.3%) lesions (161 patients; median age, 55 years; range, 26–79 years), while local progression occurred in 53 lesions. The low density of local progression was much lower than that of RSIPR (p < 0.001), and the former did not exhibit iso-/high density in the portal or equilibrium phase. Ring-like enhancement in progressive lesions was also quite different from RSIPR. Local progression rate was lower for lesions with RSIPR than for those without RSIPR (14.9% vs 25.8%; p = 0.03), and their doses were different (397.2 Gy vs 120.3 Gy, p < 0.001). Conclusions Radioactive seed-induced peritumoral reaction has characteristic manifestations on CT images, which is associated with a higher dose of lesions and lower local progression rate. Notably, the enhancement pattern of local progression was distinct from RSIPR and was clearly distinguishable on dynamic-enhanced CT. Key Points • Radioactive seed-induced peritumoral reaction after brachytherapy with125I seeds for liver malignancies has characteristic manifestations on CT images, which is associated with a higher dose of lesions (397.2 Gy vs 120.3 Gy, p < 0.001), as a focal radiation injury. • Lesions with RSIPR were less likely to develop local progression, while those without RSIPR had a higher rate of local progression (14.9% vs 25.8%; p = 0.03). • The enhancement pattern of local progression after brachytherapy was distinct from radioactive seed-induced peritumoral reaction and was clearly distinguishable on dynamic-enhanced CT. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09074-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanyu Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Dechao Jiao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng Peng
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanling Zhang
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, People's Republic of China
| | - Letao Lin
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihui Zhong
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Intervention, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai, 519000, People's Republic of China
| | - Kaihao Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Fujun Zhang
- Department of Minimally Invasive & Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Predictive Parameters in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan for Unresectable Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Pooled Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1304-1313. [PMID: 35922562 PMCID: PMC9458688 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to identify positive predictors for survival in uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP), by retrospectively pooling data from three centers. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis including patients (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 18 years) treated with M-PHP between February 2014 and December 2019 for unresectable liver-dominant or liver-only metastases from UM. Predictors for OS were assessed using uni- and multivariate analyses. Other study outcome measures were response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), liver progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS) and complications according to CTCAEv5.0. Results In total, 101 patients (47.5% males; median age 59.0 years) completed a minimum of one M-PHP. At a median follow-up time of 15.0 months, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease were seen in five (5.0%), 55 (54.5%), 30 (29.7%) and 11 (10.9%) patients, respectively, leading to a 89.1% disease control rate. Median PFS, LPFS and OS were 9.0, 11.0 and 20.0 months, respectively. Survival analyses stratified for radiological response demonstrated significant improved survival in patients with CR or PR and SD category. Treatment of the primary tumor with radiotherapy, ≥ 2 M-PHP and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) < 248 U/L were correlated with improved OS. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% (n = 2). Most common complication was hematological toxicity (self-limiting in most cases). Conclusion M-PHP is safe and effective in patients with UM liver metastases. Achieving CR, PR or SD is associated with improved survival. Primary tumor treatment with radiotherapy, normal baseline LDH and > 1 M-PHP cycles are associated with improved OS.
Collapse
|
28
|
Zensen S, Opitz MK, Ludwig JM, Haubold J, Richly H, Siveke JT, Theysohn JM, Forsting M, Bos D, Schaarschmidt BM. Radiation Dose Aspects of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:841-845. [PMID: 35437708 PMCID: PMC9117360 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03130-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In uveal melanoma patients, liver metastases can be treated by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). During this procedure, melphalan or, less frequently, fotemustine is infused into the hepatic artery or the hepatic lobe arteries in regularly repeated interventions to achieve local tumor control. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure of HAIC. Material and methods In this retrospective study, dose data from 841 procedures in 140 patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 74 female) who underwent HAIC between 06/2017 and 10/2021 at one of three different angiography systems were analyzed. Results In the overall population, dose area product (DAP) (median (IQR)) was 1773 cGy·cm2 (884–3688). DAP was significantly higher in the first intervention, where a complete diagnostic workup of the vasculature was performed, than in follow-up interventions: 5765 cGy·cm2 (3160–8804) versus 1502 cGy·cm2 (807–2712) (p < 0.0001). DAP also increased significantly with the number of infusion positions (median, (IQR)): one position 1301 cGy·cm2 (633–2717), two positions 1985 cGy·cm2 (1118–4074), three positions 6407 cGy·cm2 (2616–11590) (p < 0.0001). Conclusion In uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases undergoing HAIC, radiation exposure is significantly higher both at the first intervention compared to follow-up interventions, but also with increasing number of infusion positions. Level of evidence: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zensen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - Marcel K Opitz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes M Ludwig
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Heike Richly
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens T Siveke
- Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.,Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens M Theysohn
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Forsting
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Denise Bos
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt M Schaarschmidt
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Modi S, Gibson T, Vigneswaran G, Patel S, Wheater M, Karydis I, Gupta S, Takhar A, Pearce N, Ottensmeier C, Stedman B. Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion of melphalan for metastatic uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:103-111. [PMID: 35254333 PMCID: PMC8893121 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma, the most common primary ocular malignancy in adults, carries a poor prognosis: 50% of patients develop the metastatic disease with a 10-25% 1-year survival and no established standard of care treatment. Prior studies of melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) have shown promise in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients with liver predominant disease but are limited by small sample sizes. We contribute our findings on the safety and efficacy of the procedure in the largest sample population to date. A retrospective analysis of outcome and safety data for all mUM patients receiving M-PHP was performed. Tumour response and treatment toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.03, respectively. 250 M-PHP procedures were performed in 81 patients (median of three per patient). The analysis demonstrated a hepatic disease control rate of 88.9% (72/81), a hepatic response rate of 66.7% (54/81), and an overall response rate of 60.5% (49/81). After a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median overall progression-free (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 8.4 and 14.9 months, respectively. There were no fatal treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). Forty-three grade 3 (29) or 4 (14) TRAE occurred in 23 (27.7%) patients with a significant reduction in such events between procedures performed in 2016-2020 vs. 2012-2016 (0.17 vs. 0.90 per patient, P < 0.001). M-PHP provides excellent response rates and PFS compared with other available treatments, with decreasing side effect profile with experience. Combination therapy with systemic agents may be viable to further advance OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Modi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Tom Gibson
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Ganesh Vigneswaran
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
- University of Southampton
| | - Shian Patel
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Matthew Wheater
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Ioannis Karydis
- University of Southampton
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Arjun Takhar
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - Neil Pearce
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - Christian Ottensmeier
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology (ISMIB), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Brian Stedman
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Safety and Efficacy of Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab and Sequential Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051162. [PMID: 35267470 PMCID: PMC8909598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite recent progress on the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM), prognosis remains dismal for the majority of patients. Directed liver therapies including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) have been the pillar of hepatic metastases management. Independently, immune checkpoint blockade by combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has demonstrated a median survival slightly superior to 1 year. However, the benefit of sequential ipilimumab plus nivolumab immunotherapy and SIRT has not been elucidated. Abstract To assess the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab around selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). We present a retrospective, single center study of 32 patients with mUM divided into two groups based on the treatment received between April 2013 and April 2021. The SIRT_IpiNivo cohort was treated with Yttrium-90 microspheres and ipilimumab plus nivolumab before or after the SIRT (n = 18). The SIRT cohort underwent SIRT but did not receive combined immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 14). Twelve patients (66.7%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo arm received SIRT as first-line treatment and six patients (33.3%) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab prior to SIRT. In the SIRT group, seven patients (50.0%) received single-agent immunotherapy. One patient treated with combined immunotherapy 68 months after the SIRT was included in this group. At the start of ipilimumab plus nivolumab, 94.4% (n = 17) presented hepatic metastases and 72.2% (n = 13) had extra liver disease. Eight patients (44.4%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo group experienced grade 3 or 4 immune related adverse events, mainly colitis and hepatitis. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of metastases was 49.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI); 24.1-not available (NA)) in the SIRT_IpiNivo group compared with 13.6 months (95% CI; 11.5-NA) in the SIRT group (log-rank p-value 0.027). The presence of extra liver metastases at the time of SIRT, largest liver lesion more than 8 cm (M1c) and liver tumor volume negatively impacted the survival. This real-world cohort suggests that a sequential treatment of ipilimumab plus nivolumab and SIRT is a well-tolerated therapeutic approach with promising survival rates.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tong TML, van der Kooij MK, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Lutjeboer J, van Persijn van Meerten EL, Martini CH, Zoethout RWM, Tijl FGJ, Blank CU, Burgmans MC, Kapiteijn E. Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Trials 2022; 23:137. [PMID: 35152908 PMCID: PMC8842930 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06036-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, no standard treatments are available for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). Several locoregional therapies are effective in the treatment of liver metastases, such as percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP). The available literature suggests that treatment with ICI following locoregional treatment of liver UM metastases can result in clinical response. We hypothesize that combining M-PHP with ICI will lead to enhanced antigen presentation and increased immunomodulatory effect, improving control of both hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Methods Open-label, single-center, phase Ib/randomized phase II trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of M-PHP with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases of UM in first-line treatment, with or without the limited extrahepatic disease. The primary objective is to determine the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination regimen, defined by maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). A maximum of 88 patients will be treated in phase I and phase II combined. Baseline characteristics will be described with descriptive statistics (t-test, chi-square test). To study the association between risk factors and toxicity, a logistic regression model will be applied. PFS and OS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Discussion This is the first trial to evaluate this treatment combination by establishing the maximum tolerated dose and evaluating the efficacy of the combination treatment. M-PHP has shown to be a safe and effective treatment for UM patients with liver metastases and became the standard treatment option in our center. The combination of ICI with M-PHP is investigated in the currently described trial which might lead to a better treatment response both in and outside the liver. Trial Registration This trial was registered in the US National Library of Medicine with identifier NCT04283890. Registered as per February 2020 - Retrospectively registered. EudraCT registration number: 2018-004248-49. Local MREC registration number: NL60508.058.19.
Collapse
|
32
|
Alexander H, Wen D, Chu M, Han C, Hadden P, Thomas R, Bartlett A. Selective internal radiation therapy for hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210200. [PMID: 34757824 PMCID: PMC8722257 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uveal melanoma (UM) commonly metastasizes to the liver. Treatment usually consists of liver-directed therapies, such as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). This review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of SIRT for hepatic metastases from UM. METHODS The study protocol is available at OSF (https://osf.io/vhyct/). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched until July 2020, using terms related to SIRT and hepatic metastases from UM. Studies reporting outcomes of SIRT in patients with UM and at least one hepatic metastasis were included. Data on overall survival (OS), hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) or tumor response were collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS 11 studies were included, reporting outcomes for 268 patients with hepatic metastases from UM. Most studies (n = 9, 81.8%) were retrospective. Disease control was achieved in 170 patients (67.5%) and the median OS from time of SIRT was 12.3 months. Median hPFS was 5.4 months. Low-grade side-effects were common but serious complications were infrequent. There were two treatment-related deaths. The median NOS score was 6 (moderate risk of bias). CONCLUSION SIRT appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. The certainty of our results is unclear due to predominantly retrospective data with moderate risk of bias. Further prospective studies are required to explore the role of SIRT in UM. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SIRT appears to be a safe treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. Further prospective work is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Alexander
- Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Wen
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael Chu
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Han
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Hadden
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Robert Thomas
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma: The Status Quo, Recent Advances and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010096. [PMID: 35008260 PMCID: PMC8749988 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although rare, uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common cancer that develops inside adult eyes. The prognosis is poor, since 50% of patients will develop lethal metastases in the first decade, especially to the liver. Once metastases are detected, life expectancy is limited, given that the available treatments are mostly unsuccessful. Thus, there is a need to find methods that can accurately predict UM prognosis and also effective therapeutic strategies to treat this cancer. In this manuscript, we initially compile the current knowledge on epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular features of UM. Then, we cover the most relevant prognostic factors currently used for the evaluation and follow-up of UM patients. Afterwards, we highlight emerging molecular markers in UM published over the last three years. Finally, we discuss the problems preventing meaningful advances in the treatment and prognostication of UM patients, as well as forecast new roadblocks and paths of UM-related research. Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common malignant intraocular tumour in the adult population. It is a rare cancer with an incidence of nearly five cases per million inhabitants per year, which develops from the uncontrolled proliferation of melanocytes in the choroid (≈90%), ciliary body (≈6%) or iris (≈4%). Patients initially present either with symptoms like blurred vision or photopsia, or without symptoms, with the tumour being detected in routine eye exams. Over the course of the disease, metastases, which are initially dormant, develop in nearly 50% of patients, preferentially in the liver. Despite decades of intensive research, the only approach proven to mildly control disease spread are early treatments directed to ablate liver metastases, such as surgical excision or chemoembolization. However, most patients have a limited life expectancy once metastases are detected, since there are limited therapeutic approaches for the metastatic disease, including immunotherapy, which unlike in cutaneous melanoma, has been mostly ineffective for UM patients. Therefore, in order to offer the best care possible to these patients, there is an urgent need to find robust models that can accurately predict the prognosis of UM, as well as therapeutic strategies that effectively block and/or limit the spread of the metastatic disease. Here, we initially summarized the current knowledge about UM by compiling the most relevant epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular data. Then, we revisited the most important prognostic factors currently used for the evaluation and follow-up of primary UM cases. Afterwards, we addressed emerging prognostic biomarkers in UM, by comprehensively reviewing gene signatures, immunohistochemistry-based markers and proteomic markers resulting from research studies conducted over the past three years. Finally, we discussed the current hurdles in the field and anticipated the future challenges and novel avenues of research in UM.
Collapse
|
34
|
Rossi E, Croce M, Reggiani F, Schinzari G, Ambrosio M, Gangemi R, Tortora G, Pfeffer U, Amaro A. Uveal Melanoma Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5684. [PMID: 34830841 PMCID: PMC8616038 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Rossi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (G.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Michela Croce
- Laboratory of Biotherapies, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (M.C.); (R.G.)
| | - Francesco Reggiani
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.R.); (M.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (G.S.); (G.T.)
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Ambrosio
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.R.); (M.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Rosaria Gangemi
- Laboratory of Biotherapies, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (M.C.); (R.G.)
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (E.R.); (G.S.); (G.T.)
- Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Ulrich Pfeffer
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.R.); (M.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Adriana Amaro
- Laboratory of Epigenetics, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.R.); (M.A.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bethlehem MS, Katsarelias D, Olofsson Bagge R. Meta-Analysis of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion and Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184726. [PMID: 34572953 PMCID: PMC8469397 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Isolated hepatic perfusion is one of the available treatment options for patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. This is an open surgical procedure where the liver is isolated from the circulation and perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent. A modern development is the minimally invasive percutaneous hepatic perfusion, where the liver is endovascularly isolated and then perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent through a catheter in the arterial system. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to compare these modalities in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, complications and response. Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma is the most commonly occurring primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and patients have a high risk of developing metastatic disease, mostly in the liver. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a liver-directed therapy for patients with liver metastases. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a minimally invasive technique, is available as well. PHP benefits from the fact that the procedure can be repeated and therefore possibly offers better survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of nine articles reporting on eight studies were included in the analysis. Individual survival data were extracted from each study. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 months for IHP and 17.3 months for PHP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months for IHP and 9.6 months for PHP. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 10 months for IHP and 9.5 months for PHP. The complication rate and 30-day mortality rate were 39.1% and 5.5% for IHP and 23.8% and 1.8% for PHP. Conclusion: There was no difference in OS or PFS between IHP and PHP for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases, but patients have significantly less of a risk for complications and mortality following PHP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn S. Bethlehem
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Comito F, Marchese PV, Ricci AD, Tober N, Peterle C, Sperandi F, Melotti B. Systemic and liver-directed therapies in metastatic uveal melanoma: state-of-the-art and novel perspectives. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4583-4606. [PMID: 34431316 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is the most common form of noncutaneous melanoma. It is different from its cutaneous counterpart and is characterized by a very poor prognosis. Despite groundbreaking improvements in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, there have been few advances in the treatment of MUM, and standard treatments for MUM have not been defined. We performed a systematic review focusing our attention on all interventional studies, ongoing or already published, concerning the treatment of MUM. We present results from studies of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and liver-directed therapies. Although the results in this setting have been disappointing until now, trials investigating novel immunotherapeutic strategies alone and in combination with targeted agents and liver-directed therapies are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Comito
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Paola Valeria Marchese
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Angela Dalia Ricci
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Nastassja Tober
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Chiara Peterle
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperandi
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bechrakis NE, Bornfeld N, Heindl LM, Skoetz N, Leyvraz S, Joussen AM. Uveal Melanoma - Standardised Procedure in Diagnosis, Therapy and Surveillance. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238:761-772. [PMID: 34376006 DOI: 10.1055/a-1534-0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma is a rare intraocular tumour, for which there is currently no national evidence-based guideline in Germany. The aim of this project was to provide a common standard operating procedure (SOP) for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of uveal melanoma, within the network of German leading oncology centres funded by German Cancer Aid. The SOP was created as part of a moderated consensus process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In a multistage process, a common SOP was developed for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of uveal melanoma, as based on current knowledge of the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Norbert Bornfeld
- Zentrum für Erkrankungen des hinteren Augenabschnitts, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Deutschland
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Centrum für integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Aachen-Bonn-Köln-Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Serge Leyvraz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Antonia M Joussen
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Garrido I, Coelho R, Lopes J, Macedo G. Unexpected diagnosis for nodular hepatic lesions. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2021; 113:803. [PMID: 34315219 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8230/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor and has a significant predilection for metastasis to the liver. Nevertheless, metastatic uveal melanoma usually occurs in the first years after the initial treatment and late recurrence is extremely rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Garrido
- Gastrenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Portugal
| | - Rosa Coelho
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Portugal
| | | | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fallico M, Raciti G, Longo A, Reibaldi M, Bonfiglio V, Russo A, Caltabiano R, Gattuso G, Falzone L, Avitabile T. Current molecular and clinical insights into uveal melanoma (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 58:10. [PMID: 33649778 PMCID: PMC7910016 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most prominent primary eye cancer in adults. With an incidence of approximately 5 cases per million individuals annually in the United States, UM could be considered a relatively rare cancer. The 90-95% of UM cases arise from the choroid. Diagnosis is based mainly on a clinical examination and ancillary tests, with ocular ultrasonography being of greatest value. Differential diagnosis can prove challenging in the case of indeterminate choroidal lesions and, sometimes, monitoring for documented growth may be the proper approach. Fine needle aspiration biopsy tends to be performed with a prognostic purpose, often in combination with radiotherapy. Gene expression profiling has allowed for the grading of UMs into two classes, which feature different metastatic risks. Patients with UM require a specialized multidisciplinary management. Primary tumor treatment can be either enucleation or globe preserving. Usually, enucleation is reserved for larger tumors, while radiotherapy is preferred for small/medium melanomas. The prognosis is unfavorable due to the high mortality rate and high tendency to metastasize. Following the development of metastatic disease, the mortality rate increases to 80% within one year, due to both the absence of an effective treatment and the aggressiveness of the condition. Novel molecular studies have allowed for a better understanding of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved in UM biological activity, which differs compared to skin melanomas. The most commonly mutated genes are GNAQ, GNA11 and BAP1. Research in this field could help to identify effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Fallico
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Raciti
- Department of Drug Sciences, Section of Biochemistry, University of Catania, I‑95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Longo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, I‑10122 Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenza Bonfiglio
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Ophthalmology Section, University of Palermo, I‑90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Russo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Rosario Caltabiano
- Department 'G.F. Ingrassia', Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gattuso
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Falzone
- Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione G. Pascale', I‑80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Teresio Avitabile
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dewald CLA, Hinrichs JB, Becker LS, Maschke S, Meine TC, Saborowski A, Schönfeld LJ, Vogel A, Kirstein MM, Wacker FK. Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: Outcome and Safety in Patients with Metastasized Uveal Melanoma. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2021; 193:928-936. [PMID: 33535258 DOI: 10.1055/a-1348-1932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemosaturation percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic melphalan in patients with curatively untreatable liver tumors while limiting systemic toxicity through hemofiltration of the hepatic venous blood. Aim of this study was to investigate the response to therapy, survival and safety of the CS-PHP procedure in patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (mhPFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Adverse events were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. RESULTS Overall, 30 patients were treated with 70 CS-PHP in a salvage setting from October 2014 to January 2019. In total, ORR and DCR were 42.3 % and 80.8 %, respectively. Overall, mOS was 12 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 7-15) months, and both, mPFS and mhPFS were 6 months, respectively (95 % CI 4-10; 95 % CI 4-13). Adverse events (AE) most frequently included significant but transient hematologic toxicities (87 % of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia), less frequent AEs were hepatic injury extending to liver failure (3 %), cardiovascular events including one case of ischemic stroke (3 %). CONCLUSION Salvage treatment with CS-PHP is effective in selected patients with UM. The interventional procedure is safe. Serious hepatic and cardiovascular events, although rare, require careful patient selection and should be closely monitored. KEY POINTS · CS-PHP is safe for selected patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.. · CS-PHP resulted in hepatic disease control in 80 % of patients.. · Hematologic events following CS-PHP are common but manageable.. CITATION FORMAT · Dewald CL, Hinrichs JB, Becker LS et al. Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: Outcome and Safety in Patients with Metastasized Uveal Melanoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 928 - 936.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan B Hinrichs
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lena Sophie Becker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sabine Maschke
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Timo C Meine
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anna Saborowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leon Jonas Schönfeld
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- 1st Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Frank K Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eleuteri A, Rola AC, Kalirai H, Hussain R, Sacco J, Damato BE, Heimann H, Coupland SE, Taktak AFG. Cost-utility analysis of a decade of liver screening for metastases using the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online (LUMPO). Comput Biol Med 2021; 130:104221. [PMID: 33516960 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This paper outlines a method for cost-utility analysis of liver screening for metastases in patients with posterior uveal melanoma (UM). A semiparametric model of the cumulative incidence of onset of liver metastases was fitted to a retrospective data set of 615 subjects with clinical follow-up with respect to liver surveillance imaging and outcome. The model was internally validated via bootstrap resampling in terms of its discrimination and calibration performance. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were derived at different time points. The discrimination performances are consistent across time. The area under the ROC curve at 5 years post treatment was 0.85 [95% CI: 0.81-0.88]. A goodness-of-fit test gives χ2(10)=5.3,p=0.9 demonstrating no evidence against the null hypothesis of zero difference between observed and expected onset of metastatic events. Results showed that at 80% sensitivity, 87% of UM patients will avoid unnecessary radiological scans. This provides potential cost savings of between £46,000 and £97,000 per year to the National Health Service assuming 600 new cases per year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Eleuteri
- Department of Medial Physics and Clinical Engineering, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Alda Cunha Rola
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK
| | - Helen Kalirai
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK
| | - Rumana Hussain
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Joseph Sacco
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Bertil E Damato
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Heinrich Heimann
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Sarah E Coupland
- Liverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Department of Molecular and Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK; Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L69 3GH, UK
| | - Azzam F G Taktak
- Department of Medial Physics and Clinical Engineering, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Khan S, Carvajal RD. Dual Immunological Checkpoint Blockade for Uveal Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:554-556. [PMID: 33417487 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shaheer Khan
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liu J, Lu J, Li W. A Comprehensive Prognostic and Immunological Analysis of a Six-Gene Signature Associated With Glycolysis and Immune Response in Uveal Melanoma. Front Immunol 2021; 12:738068. [PMID: 34630418 PMCID: PMC8494389 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.738068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma with poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct a new prognostic gene signature that can be used for survival prediction and risk stratification of UM patients. In this work, transcriptome data from the Molecular Signatures Database were used to identify the cancer hallmarks most relevant to the prognosis of UM patients. Weighted gene co-expression network, univariate least absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to construct the prognostic gene characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the survival predictive ability of the gene signature. The results showed that glycolysis and immune response were the main risk factors for overall survival (OS) in UM patients. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, 238 candidates related to the prognosis of UM patients were identified (p < 0.05). Using LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses, a six-gene signature including ARPC1B, BTBD6, GUSB, KRTCAP2, RHBDD3, and SLC39A4 was constructed. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the UM cohort in the training set showed that patients with higher risk scores had worse OS (HR = 2.61, p < 0.001). The time-dependent ROC (t-ROC) curve showed that the risk score had good predictive efficiency for UM patients in the training set (AUC > 0.9). Besides, t-ROC analysis showed that the predictive ability of risk scores was significantly higher than that of other clinicopathological characteristics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that risk score was an independent risk factor for OS in UM patients. The prognostic value of risk scores was further verified in two external UM cohorts (GSE22138 and GSE84976). Two-factor survival analysis showed that UM patients with high hypoxia or immune response scores and high risk scores had the worst prognosis. Moreover, a nomogram based on the six-gene signature was established for clinical practice. In addition, risk scores were related to the immune infiltration profiles. Taken together, this study identified a new prognostic six-gene signature related to glycolysis and immune response. This six-gene signature can not only be used for survival prediction and risk stratification but also may be a potential therapeutic target for UM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Jianjun Lu
- Department of Medical Affairs, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenli Li
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
- *Correspondence: Wenli Li,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ludwig J, Haubold J, Heusner TA, Bauer S, Siveke JT, Richly H, Wetter A, Umutlu L, Theysohn JM. Lactate Dehydrogenase Prior to Transarterial Hepatic Chemoperfusion Predicts Survival and Time to Progression in Patients with Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2020; 193:683-691. [PMID: 33348383 DOI: 10.1055/a-1299-1627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a pretreatment prognostic factor in patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with transarterial hepatic chemoperfusion (THC). MATERIALS AND METHODS 56 patients (48 % male, median age: 63.5 years) underwent a median of 4 THC sessions. Kaplan-Meier for median overall survival (OS) and time to hepatic progression (TTP; 95 %CI) in months and Cox proportional hazards model for uni- (UVA) & multivariate analyses (MVA) for hazard ratio (HR) evaluation were calculated. RESULTS The median OS was 9.4 months. The pretreatment LDH value before 1st THC was the strongest OS predictor with 19.8 months for normal (≦ 280 units per liter (U/L)), 9.7 for intermediate (> 280-< 1000 U/L), and 3.84 months for high (≧ 1000 U/L) LDH. LDH significantly predicted a median TTP with 8 months, 4 months, and 1 month for normal, intermediate, and high LDH, respectively. UVA revealed intermediate (16.5) and high (77.3) LDH, bilirubin > the upper limit of normal (ULN) (2.89), alkaline phosphatase > 1.5 ULN (6.8), leukocytes > ULN (4.2), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) > ULN (7), extrahepatic metastases (1.8) and liver lesions ≥ 5 cm (3.6) as significant predictors for worse OS. MVA confirmed intermediate (5) and high (27.1) LDH, bilirubin (5.7), GGT (2.9), and tumor size ≥ 5 cm (3.7) as significant independent predictors for worse OS. Patients with decreasing vs. increasing LDH > 10 % between 1st and 2nd THC (median: 38 days) survived longer (14.6 vs. 4.3 months) and progressed later (7 months vs. 1 month). CONCLUSION Elevated pretreatment serum LDH is an essential and robust OS and TTP predictor, potentially allowing for the identification of patients benefiting most from transarterial hepatic chemoperfusion. KEY POINTS · Pretherapeutic LDH is the most reliable prognosticator for OS and TTP. · Therapy-related LDH decrease > 10 % between 1st and 2nd THC had prolonged OS and TTP. · Lower Values of LDH, bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and tumor size are independent pretherapeutic predictors for longer OS. · Extrahepatic metastases do not have an independent influence on overall survival. CITATION FORMAT · Ludwig J, Haubold J, Heusner T et al. Lactate Dehydrogenase Prior to Transarterial Hepatic Chemoperfusion Predicts Survival and Time to Progression in Patients with Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 683 - 691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Ludwig
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Till-Alexander Heusner
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology/Neuroradiology, Sankt-Elisabeth-Hospital Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bauer
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Jens T Siveke
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), partner location University Hospital Essen, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Heike Richly
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Wetter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Jens M Theysohn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Li Y, Shi J, Yang J, Ge S, Zhang J, Jia R, Fan X. Uveal melanoma: progress in molecular biology and therapeutics. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920965852. [PMID: 33149769 PMCID: PMC7586035 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920965852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. So far, no systemic therapy or standard treatment exists to reduce the risk of metastasis and improve overall survival of patients. With the increased knowledge regarding the molecular pathways that underlie the oncogenesis of UM, it is expected that novel therapeutic approaches will be available to conquer this disease. This review provides a summary of the current knowledge of, and progress made in understanding, the pathogenesis, genetic mutations, epigenetics, and immunology of UM. With the advent of the omics era, multi-dimensional big data are publicly available, providing an innovation platform to develop effective targeted and personalized therapeutics for UM patients. Indeed, recently, a great number of therapies have been reported specifically for UM caused by oncogenic mutations, as well as other etiologies. In this review, special attention is directed to advancements in targeted therapies. In particular, we discuss the possibilities of targeting: GNAQ/GNA11, PLCβ, and CYSLTR2 mutants; regulators of G-protein signaling; the secondary messenger adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6); downstream pathways, such as those involving mitogen-activated protein kinase/MEK/extracellular signal-related kinase, protein kinase C (PKC), phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), Trio/Rho/Rac/Yes-associated protein, and inactivated BAP1; and immune-checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell-death protein 1/programmed cell-death ligand 1. Furthermore, we conducted a survey of completed and ongoing clinical trials applying targeted and immune therapies for UM. Although drug combination therapy based on the signaling pathways involved in UM has made great progress, targeted therapy is still an unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongyun Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiahao Shi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengfang Ge
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianming Zhang
- National Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Renbing Jia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200001, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, 200001, China
| | - Xianqun Fan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200001, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, 833 Zhizaoju Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200001, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chua V, Mattei J, Han A, Johnston L, LiPira K, Selig SM, Carvajal RD, Aplin AE, Patel SP. The Latest on Uveal Melanoma Research and Clinical Trials: Updates from the Cure Ocular Melanoma (CURE OM) Science Meeting (2019). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:28-33. [PMID: 33060121 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is a rare cancer in adults, but its treatment is one of the clinical unmet needs in the melanoma field. Metastatic disease develops in approximately 50% of patients and is associated with poor survival due to the lack of effective treatment options. It provides a paradigm for cancers that show evidence of aberrant G protein-coupled receptor signaling, tumor dormancy, and liver-selective metastatic tropism and are associated with the loss of the BAP1 tumor suppressor. At the Melanoma Research Foundation CURE OM Science Meeting at the Society for Melanoma Research Meeting held in Utah on November 20, 2019, clinicians and researchers presented findings from their studies according to three themes within uveal melanoma: (i) ongoing clinical trials, (ii) molecular determinants, and (iii) novel targets that could be translated into clinical trials. This meeting underscored the high interest in the uveal melanoma research field and the unmet need for effective treatment strategies for late-stage disease. Findings from ongoing clinical trials are promising, and multiple studies show how novel combinatorial strategies increase response rates. Novel targets and tumor vulnerabilities identified bioinformatically or through high-throughput screens also reveal new opportunities to target uveal melanoma. The future directions pursued by the uveal melanoma research field will likely have an impact on other cancer types that harbor similar genetic alterations and/or show similar biological properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Chua
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jane Mattei
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna Han
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Richard D Carvajal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew E Aplin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Clinical Application of Trans-Arterial Radioembolization in Hepatic Malignancies in Europe: First Results from the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 44:21-35. [PMID: 32959085 PMCID: PMC7728645 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02642-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To address the lack of prospective data on the real-life clinical application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) in Europe, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) initiated the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres® Therapy (CIRT). Materials and Methods Patients were enrolled from 1 January 2015 till 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were adult patients treated with TARE with Y90 resin microspheres for primary or metastatic liver tumours. Patients were followed up for 24 months after treatment, whereas data on the clinical context of TARE, overall survival (OS) and safety were collected. Results Totally, 1027 patients were analysed. 68.2% of the intention of treatment was palliative. Up to half of the patients received systemic therapy and/or locoregional treatments prior to TARE (53.1%; 38.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was reported per cohort and was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2–19.3) for hepatocellular carcinoma, 14.6 months (95% CI 10.9–17.9) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. For liver metastases, median OS for colorectal cancer was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.3–12.9), 5.6 months for pancreatic cancer (95% CI 4.1–6.6), 10.6 months (95% CI 7.3–14.4) for breast cancer, 14.6 months (95% CI 7.3–21.4) for melanoma and 33.1 months (95% CI 22.1–nr) for neuroendocrine tumours. Statistically significant prognostic factors in terms of OS include the presence of ascites, cirrhosis, extra-hepatic disease, patient performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), number of chemotherapy lines prior to TARE and tumour burden. Thirty-day mortality rate was 1.0%. 2.5% experienced adverse events grade 3 or 4 within 30 days after TARE. Conclusion In the real-life clinical setting, TARE is largely considered to be a part of a palliative treatment strategy across indications and provides an excellent safety profile. Level of evidence Level 3. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02305459. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02642-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
48
|
Bergamini C, Cavalieri S, Cascella T, Lanocita R, Alfieri S, Resteghini C, Platini F, Orlandi E, Locati LD, Marchianò A, Licitra L. Local therapies for liver metastases of rare head and neck cancers: a monoinstitutional case series. TUMORI JOURNAL 2020; 107:188-195. [PMID: 32924878 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620952844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are established procedures for treating hepatocellular cancer and selected malignancies with liver metastasis. The aim of this study is to describe a monoinstitutional case series of local approaches in patients with liver metastases from rare head and neck cancers (HNCs). METHODS This is a retrospective series of adult patients with HNC treated with liver locoregional approaches (TACE or RFA) at our institution from 2007 to 2018. In case of chemoembolization, the preferred chemotherapeutic drug was doxorubicin. Response according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was assessed with contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were treated (20 men, median age 58 years) with TACE (27), transarterial embolization (2), or RFA (7). Primary tumours were salivary gland (21), thyroid (6), nasopharyngeal (5), and sinonasal cancers (2). Seventeen patients (50%) had a single metastatic liver nodule; 70% of the remaining 17 patients had at least three liver metastases. The median diameter of the metastatic liver mass undergoing treatment was 39 mm (range 11-100 mm). Median follow-up was 27.6 months. Response rate was 35% (3% complete, 32% partial response). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 19.6 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 59% of patients (21% grade ⩾ 3; no grade 5). DISCUSSION This retrospective case series demonstrates that locoregional radiologic approaches for rare HNCs with liver metastases are feasible. These procedures deserve further prospective studies before being considered safe and active in these malignancies where the availability of effective systemic treatments is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Bergamini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Alfieri
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Platini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy 1-2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Deborah Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marchianò
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bajwa R, Madoff DC, Kishore SA. Embolotherapy for Hepatic Oncology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. DIGESTIVE DISEASE INTERVENTIONS 2020; 4:134-147. [PMID: 32832829 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AbstractPrimary and secondary liver cancers are a major cause of mortality worldwide. Transarterial liver-directed therapy, or embolotherapy, represents an important locoregional treatment strategy for primary and secondary liver tumors. Embolotherapeutic modalities include bland embolization (transarterial embolization), chemoembolization (transarterial chemoembolization), and radioembolization or selective internal radiotherapy. A brief technical overview of embolotherapeutic modalities as well as supportive evidence for the treatment of most common primary and secondary liver tumors will be discussed in this review. Several potential future applications, including synergy with systemic therapy, interventional theranostics, and artificial intelligence will also be reviewed briefly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raazi Bajwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - David C Madoff
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sirish A Kishore
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|