1
|
Tong TML, Fiocco M, van Duijn-de Vreugd JJ, Lutjeboer J, Speetjens FM, Tijl FGJ, Sitsen ME, Zoethout RWM, Martini CH, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Meer RW, van Rijswijk CSP, van Erkel AR, Kapiteijn E, Burgmans MC. Correction to: Quality of Life Analysis of Patients Treated with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00270-024-03733-w. [PMID: 38709262 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03733-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- T M L Tong
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Medical Statistics Section, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J van Duijn-de Vreugd
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Lutjeboer
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M E Sitsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R W M Zoethout
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R W van der Meer
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C S P van Rijswijk
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A R van Erkel
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tong TML, Fiocco M, van Duijn-de Vreugd JJ, Lutjeboer J, Speetjens FM, Tijl FGJ, Sitsen ME, Zoethout RWM, Martini CH, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Meer RW, van Rijswijk CSP, van Erkel AR, Kapiteijn E, Burgmans MC. Quality of Life Analysis of Patients Treated with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00270-024-03713-0. [PMID: 38587534 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03713-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) is a minimally invasive therapy with proven efficacy in patients with uveal melanoma (UM) liver metastases. M-PHP is associated with a short hospital admission time and limited systemic side effects. In this study, we assessed quality of life (QoL) in UM patients treated with M-PHP. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, single-center study including 24 patients treated with M-PHP for UM metastases to the liver. QoL questionnaires were collected at baseline, on day 2/3 after M-PHP, and on day 7 and day 21 after M-PHP, according to study protocol. The results were scored according to EORTC-QLQ C30 global health status (GHS), functional scales, and symptom scales. The difference in scores at baseline and subsequent time points was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multiple testing Bonferroni correction. Adverse events (AE) were registered up to 30 days after M-PHP according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS Twenty-four patients (14 males; median age 63.0 years) completed 96 questionnaires. Most scores on all scales declined on day 2/3 after M-PHP. On day 21 after M-PHP, 12 out of 15 scores returned to baseline, including median GHS scores. Three variables were significantly worse on day 21 compared to baseline: fatigue (6-33; p = 0.002), physical functioning (100 vs 86.7; p = 0.003), and role functioning (100 vs 66.7; p = 0.001). Grade 3/4 AEs consisted mainly of hematological complications, such as leukopenia and thrombopenia. CONCLUSION M-PHP causes fatigue and a decline in physical and role functioning in the 1st weeks after treatment, but GHS returns to baseline levels within 21 days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M L Tong
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Medical Statistics Section, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J van Duijn-de Vreugd
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Lutjeboer
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M E Sitsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R W M Zoethout
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R W van der Meer
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C S P van Rijswijk
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A R van Erkel
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, C2-S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Filipe WF, Buisman FE, Franssen S, Krul MF, Grünhagen DJ, Bennink RJ, Bolhuis K, Bruijnen RCG, Buffart TE, Burgmans MC, van Delden OM, Doornebosch PG, Gobardhan PD, Graven L, de Groot JWB, Grootscholten C, Hagendoorn J, Harmsen P, Homs MYV, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Lam MGEH, Loosveld OJL, Meier MAJ, Mieog JSD, Oostdijk AHJ, Outmani L, Patijn GA, Pool S, Rietbergen DDD, Roodhart JML, Speetjens FM, Swijnenburg RJ, Versleijen MWJ, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann KFD, Moelker A, Groot Koerkamp B. Extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion after hepatic arterial infusion pump implantation: incidence and clinical implications. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01231-0. [PMID: 38604828 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigates the incidence of extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion at intraoperative methylene blue testing and on postoperative nuclear imaging in patients undergoing hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy. METHODS The first 150 consecutive patients who underwent pump implantation in the Netherlands were included. All patients underwent surgical pump implantation with the catheter in the gastroduodenal artery. All patients underwent intraoperative methylene blue testing and postoperative nuclear imaging (99mTc-Macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT) to determine perfusion via the pump. RESULTS Patients were included between January-2018 and December-2021 across eight centers. During methylene blue testing, 29.3% had extrahepatic perfusion, all successfully managed intraoperatively. On nuclear imaging, no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion was detected (0%, 95%CI: 0.0-2.5%). During methylene blue testing, 2.0% had unresolved incomplete hepatic perfusion. On postoperative nuclear imaging, 8.1% had incomplete hepatic perfusion, leading to embolization in only 1.3%. CONCLUSION Methylene blue testing during pump placement for intra-arterial chemotherapy identified extrahepatic perfusion in 29.3% of patients, but could be resolved intraoperatively in all patients. Postoperative nuclear imaging found no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion and led to embolization in only 1.3% of patients. The role of routine nuclear imaging after HAIP implantation should be studied in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wills F Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Florian E Buisman
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn Franssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myrtle F Krul
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | | | - Laura Graven
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Harmsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf J L Loosveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Mark A J Meier
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ad H J Oostdijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Loubna Outmani
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Pool
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michelle W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hendriks P, Rietbergen DDD, van Erkel AR, Coenraad MJ, Arntz MJ, Bennink RJ, Braat AE, Crobach S, van Delden OM, Dibbets-Schneider P, van der Hulle T, Klümpen HJ, van der Meer RW, Nijsen JFW, van Rijswijk CSP, Roosen J, Ruijter BN, Smit F, Stam MK, Takkenberg RB, Tushuizen ME, van Velden FHP, de Geus-Oei LF, Burgmans MC. Adjuvant holmium-166 radioembolization after radiofrequency ablation in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a dose-finding study (HORA EST HCC trial). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06630-z. [PMID: 38329507 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06630-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the biodistribution of (super-)selective trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with holmium-166 microspheres (166Ho-MS), when administered as adjuvant therapy after RFA of HCC 2-5 cm. The objective was to establish a treatment volume absorbed dose that results in an absorbed dose of ≥ 120 Gy on the hyperemic zone around the ablation necrosis (i.e., target volume). METHODS In this multicenter, prospective dose-escalation study in BCLC early stage HCC patients with lesions 2-5 cm, RFA was followed by (super-)selective infusion of 166Ho-MS on day 5-10 after RFA. Dose distribution within the treatment volume was based on SPECT-CT. Cohorts of up to 10 patients were treated with an incremental dose (60 Gy, 90 Gy, 120 Gy) of 166Ho-MS to the treatment volume. The primary endpoint was to obtain a target volume dose of ≥ 120 Gy in 9/10 patients within a cohort. RESULTS Twelve patients were treated (male 10; median age, 66.5 years (IQR, [64.3-71.7])) with a median tumor diameter of 2.7 cm (IQR, [2.1-4.0]). At a treatment volume absorbed dose of 90 Gy, the primary endpoint was met with a median absorbed target volume dose of 138 Gy (IQR, [127-145]). No local recurrences were found within 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Adjuvant (super-)selective infusion of 166Ho-MS after RFA for the treatment of HCC can be administered safely at a dose of 90 Gy to the treatment volume while reaching a dose of ≥ 120 Gy to the target volume and may be a favorable adjuvant therapy for HCC lesions 2-5 cm. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03437382 . (registered: 19-02-2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Hendriks
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Arntz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Dibbets-Schneider
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van der Hulle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Frank W Nijsen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina S P van Rijswijk
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joey Roosen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastian N Ruijter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frits Smit
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mette K Stam
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Bart Takkenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten E Tushuizen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Floris H P van Velden
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, TechMed Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Sciences & Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Interventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hendriks P, van Dijk KM, Boekestijn B, Broersen A, van Duijn-de Vreugd JJ, Coenraad MJ, Tushuizen ME, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, van Rijswijk CS, Dijkstra J, de Geus-Oei LF, Burgmans MC. Intraprocedural assessment of ablation margins using computed tomography co-registration in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with percutaneous ablation: IAMCOMPLETE study. Diagn Interv Imaging 2024; 105:57-64. [PMID: 37517969 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of ablation margin quantification using a standardized scanning protocol during thermal ablation (TA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and a rigid registration algorithm. Secondary objectives were to determine the inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation and quantification of the minimal ablation margin (MAM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients who underwent thermal ablation for HCC were included. There were thirteen men and seven women with a mean age of 67.1 ± 10.8 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 49.1-81.1 years). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination under general anesthesia directly before and after TA, with preoxygenated breath hold. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examinations were analyzed by radiologists using rigid registration software. Registration was deemed feasible when accurate rigid co-registration could be obtained. Inter- and intra-observer rates of tumor segmentation and MAM quantification were calculated. MAM values were correlated with local tumor progression (LTP) after one year of follow-up. RESULTS Co-registration of pre- and post-ablation images was feasible in 16 out of 20 patients (80%) and 26 out of 31 tumors (84%). Mean Dice similarity coefficient for inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation were 0.815 and 0.830, respectively. Mean MAM was 0.63 ± 3.589 (SD) mm (range: -6.26-6.65 mm). LTP occurred in four out of 20 patients (20%). The mean MAM value for patients who developed LTP was -4.00 mm, as compared to 0.727 mm for patients who did not develop LTP. CONCLUSION Ablation margin quantification is feasible using a standardized contrast-enhanced computed tomography protocol. Interpretation of MAM was hampered by the occurrence of tissue shrinkage during TA. Further validation in a larger cohort should lead to meaningful cut-off values for technical success of TA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Kiki M van Dijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Broersen
- LKEB Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Imaging, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten E Tushuizen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jouke Dijkstra
- LKEB Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Imaging, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Science & Technology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Görgec B, Hansen IS, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk VC, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, van Erkel AR, Gielkens HAJ, Grünhagen DJ, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kuhlmann K, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Meijerink M, Meyer Y, Morone M, Peringa J, Sijberden JP, van Delden OM, van den Bergh JE, Vanhooymissen IJS, Vermaas M, Willemssen FEJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. MRI in addition to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): an international, multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:137-146. [PMID: 38081200 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines are inconclusive on whether contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid and diffusion-weighted imaging should be added routinely to CT in the investigation of patients with colorectal liver metastases who are scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation, or both. Although contrast-enhanced MRI is reportedly superior than contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterisation of colorectal liver metastases, its effect on clinical patient management is unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI on local treatment plan in patients with colorectal liver metastases amenable to local treatment, based on contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS We did an international, multicentre, prospective, incremental diagnostic accuracy trial in 14 liver surgery centres in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histological proof of colorectal cancer, a WHO performance status score of 0-4, and primary or recurrent colorectal liver metastases, who were scheduled for local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. All patients had contrast-enhanced CT and liver contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid as a contrast agent before undergoing local therapy. The primary outcome was change in the local clinical treatment plan (decided by the individual clinics) on the basis of liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings, analysed in the intention-to-image population. The minimal clinically important difference in the proportion of patients who would have change in their local treatment plan due to an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI was 10%. This study is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL8039. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 325 patients with colorectal liver metastases were assessed for eligibility. 298 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population, including 177 males (59%) and 121 females (41%) with planned local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. A change in the local treatment plan based on liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings was observed in 92 (31%; 95% CI 26-36) of 298 patients. Changes were made for 40 patients (13%) requiring more extensive local therapy, 11 patients (4%) requiring less extensive local therapy, and 34 patients (11%) in whom the indication for curative-intent local therapy was revoked, including 26 patients (9%) with too extensive disease and eight patients (3%) with benign lesions on liver contrast-enhanced MRI (confirmed by a median follow-up of 21·0 months [IQR 17·5-24·0]). INTERPRETATION Liver contrast-enhanced MRI should be considered in all patients scheduled for local treatment for colorectal liver metastases on the basis of contrast-enhanced CT imaging. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society and Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunter Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hugo A J Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bart Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jan Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Inge J S Vanhooymissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hendriks P, Boel F, Oosterveer TTM, Broersen A, de Geus-Oei LF, Dijkstra J, Burgmans MC. Ablation margin quantification after thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors: How to optimize the procedure? A systematic review of the available evidence. Eur J Radiol Open 2023; 11:100501. [PMID: 37405153 PMCID: PMC10316004 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction To minimize the risk of local tumor progression after thermal ablation of liver malignancies, complete tumor ablation with sufficient ablation margins is a prerequisite. This has resulted in ablation margin quantification to become a rapidly evolving field. The aim of this systematic review is to give an overview of the available literature with respect to clinical studies and technical aspects potentially influencing the interpretation and evaluation of ablation margins. Methods The Medline database was reviewed for studies on radiofrequency and microwave ablation of liver cancer, ablation margins, image processing and tissue shrinkage. Studies included in this systematic review were analyzed for qualitative and quantitative assessment methods of ablation margins, segmentation and co-registration methods, and the potential influence of tissue shrinkage occurring during thermal ablation. Results 75 articles were included of which 58 were clinical studies. In most clinical studies the aimed minimal ablation margin (MAM) was ≥ 5 mm. In 10/31 studies, MAM quantification was performed in 3D rather than in three orthogonal image planes. Segmentations were performed either semi-automatically or manually. Rigid and non-rigid co-registration algorithms were used about as often. Tissue shrinkage rates ranged from 7% to 74%. Conclusions There is a high variability in ablation margin quantification methods. Prospectively obtained data and a validated robust workflow are needed to better understand the clinical value. Interpretation of quantified ablation margins may be influenced by tissue shrinkage, as this may cause underestimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Fleur Boel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Timo TM Oosterveer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Broersen
- LKEB Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Imaging, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, the Netherlands
| | - Jouke Dijkstra
- LKEB Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Imaging, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tong TML, Bastiaannet E, Speetjens FM, Blank CU, Luyten GPM, Jager MJ, Marinkovic M, Vu THK, Rasch CRN, Creutzberg CL, Beenakker JWM, Hartgrink HH, Bosch JJJ, Kiliç E, Naus NC, Yavuzyigitoglu S, van Rij CM, Burgmans MC, Kapiteijn EHW. Time Trends in the Treatment and Survival of 5036 Uveal Melanoma Patients in The Netherlands over a 30-Year Period. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5419. [PMID: 38001679 PMCID: PMC10670516 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare intraocular tumor with a dismal prognosis once metastasized. This study provides a nationwide overview and time trends of patients diagnosed with primary UM in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2019. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study based on patients with primary UM from the database of the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), linked with the national population registry Statistics Netherlands on inhabitants' cause of death. Two time periods (1989-2004, 2005-2019) were compared with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier and (multivariate) Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess changes over time for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS In total, 5036 patients were analyzed with a median age of 64.0 years at the time of diagnosis. The number of patients increased over time. In the first (1989-2004) and second (2005-2019) period, 32% versus 54% of the patients received radiotherapy (p < 0.001). The median FU time was 13.4 years. The median OS of the first and second periods was 9.5 (95% CI 8.7-10.3) versus 11.3 years (95% CI 10.3-12.3; p < 0.001). The median CSS was 30.0 years (95% CI NA) in the first period and not reached in the second period (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis (MVA), female gender (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.92, p < 0.001) and radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64-0.83, p < 0.001) were associated with better OS. Radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90, p = 0.002) was also associated with better CSS. The period of diagnosis was not associated with OS or CSS. CONCLUSIONS In this study of patients with primary UM, there was a shift to the diagnosis of smaller tumors, possibly due to stage migration. There was also an increase in eye-preserving treatments over time. OS and CSS were modestly improved in the second time period; however, the time period was not associated with OS or CSS in multivariate analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs M. L. Tong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Frank M. Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian U. Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gregorius P. M. Luyten
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T. H. Khanh Vu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R. N. Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L. Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M. Beenakker
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus J. J. Bosch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Zernikedreef 8, 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C. Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M. van Rij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen H. W. Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Urlings T, Gogna A, Burgmans MC, Hiong Tay K, Wei Too C, Patel A, Ju Min Chan SX, Sum L, Venkatanarasimah N, Soo Tan B, Chandramohan S, Gutierrez C, Irani F. Intraprocedural, Intra-Arterial CT Foot Perfusion Examination for Assessment of Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231185506. [PMID: 37434379 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231185506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current techniques to evaluate computed tomography (CT) foot perfusion in patients with critical limb ischemia use high contrast doses and cannot be used during endovascular procedures. CT perfusion of the foot with intra-arterial contrast injection during endovascular treatment in a hybrid angiography CT suite might solve these problems. PURPOSE The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether intra-arterial CT foot perfusion using a hybrid CT angiosystem is feasible during endovascular treatment for critical limb ischemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective pilot study investigated intraprocedural, intra-arterial CT perfusion of the foot using a hybrid CT angiosystem in 12 patients before and after endovascular treatment for critical limb ischemia. Time to peak (TTP) and arterial blood flow were measured before and after treatment and compared using a paired t test. RESULTS All 24 CT perfusion maps could be calculated adequately. The contrast volume used for one perfusion CT scan was 4.8 ml. The mean TTP before treatment was 12.8 seconds (standard deviation [SD] 2.8) and the mean TTP posttreatment was 8.4 seconds (SD 1.7), this difference being statistically significant (p=.001). Tendency toward increased blood flow after treatment, 340 ml/min/100 ml (SD 174) vs 514 ml/min/100 ml (SD 366) was noticed (p=.104). The mean effective radiation dose was 0.145 mSv per scan. CONCLUSION Computed tomography perfusion of the foot with low contrast dose intra-arterial contrast injection during endovascular treatment in a hybrid angiography CT suite is a feasible technique. CLINICAL IMPACT Intra-arterial CT foot perfusion using a hybrid CT-angiography system is a feasible new technique during endovascular therapy for critical limb ischemia to assess the results of the treament. Future research is necessary in defining endpoints of endovascular treatment and establishing its role in limb salvage prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs Urlings
- Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Leong Sum
- Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
de Reeder A, Hendriks P, Plug-van der Plas H, Zweers D, van Overbeeke PSM, Gravendeel J, Kruimer JWH, van der Meer RW, Burgmans MC. Sustainability within interventional radiology: opportunities and hurdles. CVIR Endovasc 2023; 6:16. [PMID: 36939973 PMCID: PMC10027964 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-023-00362-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare is a highly polluting industry and attention to the need for making this sector more sustainable is growing. The interventional radiology (IR) department is a relatively unique department in the hospital because of its synergetic use of both imaging equipment and medical instruments. As a result, the interventional radiology department causes a significant environmental burden in terms of energy usage, waste and water pollution. The aim of this study was to explore the current state of sustainability within IR by conducting a survey and interviews among IR specialists in the Netherlands. RESULTS The main findings of this study were that there is a high awareness for the need of sustainability within IR, but that there is still limited action. Previous studies point towards the various opportunities in the field of energy, waste and water pollution, yet our study unveils these opportunities are often not implemented because of (1) sustainability not being a priority, (2) a dependency on employees, and (3) factors that simply cannot be changed by an individual IR department or hospital. Generally, our study indicates that there is a willingness to become more sustainable, but that the current system involves a wide range barriers that hinder true change. Furthermore, it seems that no one is currently taking the lead and a leading role from higher management, government, healthcare authorities or professional societies is lacking. CONCLUSIONS Despite the hurdles found in our study, IR departments can implement several improvements. An important factor is that sustainability should not lead to lower convenience for employees, which can be ensured by a sufficiently designed waste infrastructure and behavioral nudges. Furthermore, there lies an opportunity in more collaboration between IR departments in knowledge sharing and open innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk de Reeder
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Business-Society Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk Zweers
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Philine S M van Overbeeke
- Department of Business-Society Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Faber RA, Burghout KST, Bijlstra OD, Hendriks P, van Erp GCM, Broersen A, Dijkstra J, Vahrmeijer AL, Burgmans MC, Mieog JSD. Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration. Eur J Radiol 2022; 156:110552. [PMID: 36228455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the quantitative minimal ablation margin (MAM) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) and correlate the quantitative MAM with local tumour recurrence (LTR). METHOD Thirty-nine of 143 patients with solitary or multiple CRLM who underwent a first percutaneous TA procedure between January 2011 and May 2020 were considered eligible for study enrolment. Image fusion of pre- and post-ablation scans and 3D quantitative MAM assessment was performed using the in-house developed semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration software deLIVERed. The quantitative MAM was analysed and correlated with LTR. RESULTS Eighteen (46 %) patients were additionally excluded from further analyses due to suboptimal co-registration (quality co-registration score ≤ 3). The quality of co-registration was considered sufficient in 21 (54 %) patients with a total of 29 CRLM. LTR was found in 5 of 29 (17 %) TA-treated CRLM. In total, 12 (41 %) negative MAMs were measured (mean MAM -4.7 ± 2.7 mm). Negative MAMs were significantly more frequently seen in patients who developed LTR (100 %) compared to those without LTR (29 %; p = 0.003). The median MAM of patients who developed LTR (-6.6 mm (IQR -9.5 to -4.6)) was significantly smaller compared to the median MAM of patients without LTR (0.5 mm (IQR -1.8 to 3.0); p < 0.001). The ROC curve showed high accuracy in predicting LTR for the quantitative MAM (area under the curve of 0.975 ± 0.029). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the feasibility of 3D quantitative MAM assessment, using deLIVERed co-registration software, to assess technical success of TA in patients with CRLM and to predict LTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Faber
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Kimberly S T Burghout
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Okker D Bijlstra
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gonnie C M van Erp
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Broersen
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jouke Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Osanto S, Woei-A-Jin FJSH, Coenraad MJ, Weijl NI, Burgmans MC, Burggraaf J. In Reply: Neoadjuvant TKI Study in Early- and Intermediate Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist 2022; 27:e977-e978. [PMID: 36269167 PMCID: PMC9732251 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This letter to the editor responds to comments from Rizzo et al on recently reported results of a phase II study of dovitinib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tong TM, Burgmans MC, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, van Rijswijk CS, Jonker MA, Roozen IC, Lutjeboer J, van Persijn-van Meerten EL, Martini CH, Zoethout RW, Tijl FG, Blank CU, Kapiteijn E. Safety and efficacy of combined melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) and ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI+NIVO) in metastasized uveal melanoma (mUM): First results of the phase Ib part of the CHOPIN trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9560 Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most frequent intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Approximately 50% of all patients (pts) will develop metastatic disease in the liver. Until now, there is no systemic therapy that has been shown to improve overall survival (OS), apart from tebentafusp. M-PHP is frequently applied for liver-only UM. However, the majority of pts eventually develops extrahepatic disease after M-PHP. IPI+NIVO has been shown to induce up to 20% response rates in mUM. Our observations that checkpoint inhibition was most effective on extrahepatic UM disease has led to the CHOPIN trial testing the combination of M-PHP and IPI+NIVO. Here we present the safety and efficacy data of the phase 1b part of CHOPIN. Methods: Adult pts with confirmed measurable hepatic mUM and WHO PS 0-1 were included. Two courses of 6 weekly M-PHPs (melphalan 3mg/kg, max 220mg) were combined with four courses IPI+NIVO three-weekly escalating the dosing from 1mg/kg each IPI+NIVO (cohort 1) to IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg (cohort 2). Primary endpoint was safety of IPI+NIVO plus M-PHP. Secondary endpoints were best overall response (BOR) according to RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Results: 7 pts were included (4 male, median age 63.6 years (range 50-74)). Both cohorts were tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were observed in 2/3 pts in cohort 1 and in 3/4 pts in cohort 2 consisting of SIRS, febrile neutropenia, cholecystitis, neutropenia, thrombopenia, leukopenia, increased transaminases and fever. Grade I/II immune-related AEs occurred in all pts (myositis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis and dermatitis). BOR was 1 complete response, 5 partial responses and 1 stable disease accounting for an objective response rate (ORR) of 85.7%. At a median FU time of 20.2 months, 4 pts have an ongoing response. Currently the median PFS is 22.4 months, and all pts are still alive. Conclusions: Combining M-PHP with IPI+NIVO is safe at a dosing of IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg and very promising ORR, PFS and OS have been observed. The randomized phase II part comparing M-PHP versus M-PHP+IPI+NIVO is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT04283890.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs M.L. Tong
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology/Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frank M. Speetjens
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Arian R. van Erkel
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mare A. Jonker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Inge C.F.M. Roozen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Christian H. Martini
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Remco W.M. Zoethout
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Fred G.J. Tijl
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hendriks P, Rietbergen DDD, van Erkel AR, Coenraad MJ, Arntz MJ, Bennink RJ, Braat AE, Crobach ASLP, van Delden OM, van der Hulle T, Klümpen HJ, van der Meer RW, Nijsen JFW, van Rijswijk CSP, Roosen J, Ruijter BN, Smit F, Stam MK, Takkenberg RB, Tushuizen ME, van Velden FHP, de Geus-Oei LF, Burgmans MC. Study Protocol: Adjuvant Holmium-166 Radioembolization After Radiofrequency Ablation in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients-A Dose-Finding Study (HORA EST HCC Trial). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1057-1063. [PMID: 35618860 PMCID: PMC9307549 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03162-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the biodistribution of holmium-166 microspheres (166Ho-MS) when administered after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim is to establish a perfused liver administration dose that results in a tumoricidal dose of holmium-166 on the hyperaemic zone around the ablation necrosis (i.e. target volume). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a multicentre, prospective, dose-escalation study in HCC patients with a solitary lesion 2-5 cm, or a maximum of 3 lesions of ≤ 3 cm each. The day after RFA patients undergo angiography and cone-beam CT (CBCT) with (super)selective infusion of technetium-99 m labelled microalbumin aggregates (99mTc-MAA). The perfused liver volume is segmented from the CBCT and 166Ho-MS is administered to this treatment volume 5-10 days later. The dose of holmium-166 is escalated in a maximum of 3 patient cohorts (60 Gy, 90 Gy and 120 Gy) until the endpoint is reached. SPECT/CT is used to determine the biodistribution of holmium-166. The endpoint is met when a dose of ≥ 120 Gy has been reached on the target volume in 9/10 patients of a cohort. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival. DISCUSSION This study aims to find the optimal administration dose of adjuvant radioembolization with 166Ho-MS after RFA. Ultimately, the goal is to bring the efficacy of thermal ablation up to par with surgical resection for early-stage HCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03437382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J Arntz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A Stijn L P Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van der Hulle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Frank W Nijsen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carla S P van Rijswijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joey Roosen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastian N Ruijter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frits Smit
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mette K Stam
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Bart Takkenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten E Tushuizen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Floris H P van Velden
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bijlstra OD, Broersen A, Oosterveer TTM, Faber RA, Achterberg FB, Hurks R, Burgmans MC, Dijkstra J, Mieog JSD, Vahrmeijer AL, Swijnenburg RJ. Integration of Three-Dimensional Liver Models in a Multimodal Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery Cockpit. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12050667. [PMID: 35629335 PMCID: PMC9144252 DOI: 10.3390/life12050667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Robotic liver surgery represents the most recent evolution in the field of minimally-invasive liver surgery. For planning and guidance of liver resections, surgeons currently rely on preoperative 2-dimensional (2D) CT and/or MR imaging and intraoperative ultrasonography. Translating 2D images into digital 3-dimensional (3D) models may improve both preoperative planning and surgical guidance. The da Vinci® robotic surgical system is a platform suitable for the integration of multiple imaging modalities into one single view. In this study, we describe multimodal imaging options and introduce the Robotic Liver Surgery Cockpit; Methods: in-house developed software was used and validated for segmentation and registration to create a virtual reality 3D model of the liver based on preoperative imaging. The accuracy of the 3D models in the clinical setting was objectively assessed in 15 patients by measuring tumor diameters and subjectively with a postoperative conducted questionnaire; Results: Implementation and applicability of the 3D model in the surgical cockpit was feasible in all patients and the quality of the 3D reconstructions was high in 14 (93%) of cases. Tumor diameters measured on CT and/or MR imaging were comparable to automated measurements using the segmentation software and 3D models; Conclusions: the 3D model was successfully incorporated in the robotic surgery console as part of a multimodality imaging platform and aided the surgeon in planning and guidance of the resection. Future studies should focus on further automation of 3D rendering and progress into augmented reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okker D. Bijlstra
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.A.F.); (F.B.A.); (J.S.D.M.); (A.L.V.)
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Alexander Broersen
- Section of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (A.B.); (J.D.)
| | - Timo T. M. Oosterveer
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (T.T.M.O.); (M.C.B.)
| | - Robin A. Faber
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.A.F.); (F.B.A.); (J.S.D.M.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Friso B. Achterberg
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.A.F.); (F.B.A.); (J.S.D.M.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Rob Hurks
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (T.T.M.O.); (M.C.B.)
| | - Jouke Dijkstra
- Section of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (A.B.); (J.D.)
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.A.F.); (F.B.A.); (J.S.D.M.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Alexander L. Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.A.F.); (F.B.A.); (J.S.D.M.); (A.L.V.)
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oosterveer TTM, van Erp GCM, Hendriks P, Broersen A, Overduin CG, van Rijswijk CSP, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Tushuizen ME, Moelker A, Meijerink MR, van Delden OM, de Jong KP, van der Leij C, Smits MLJ, Urlings TAJ, Braak JPBM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, van Duijn-de Vreugd B, Zeijdner E, Goeman JJ, Fütterer JJ, Coenraad MJ, Dijkstra J, Burgmans MC. Study Protocol PROMETHEUS: Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Correlation Between Safety Margin and Local Recurrence After Thermal Ablation Using Image Co-registration in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:606-612. [PMID: 35233662 PMCID: PMC9018632 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03075-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The primary objective is to determine the minimal ablation margin required to achieve a local recurrence rate of < 10% in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing thermal ablation. Secondary objectives are to analyze the correlation between ablation margins and local recurrence and to assess efficacy. Materials and Methods This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-experimental, non-comparative, open-label study. Patients > 18 years with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (or B with a maximum of two lesions < 5 cm each) are eligible. Patients will undergo dual-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography directly before and after ablation. Ablation margins will be quantitatively assessed using co-registration software, blinding assessors (i.e. two experienced radiologists) for outcome. Presence and location of recurrence are evaluated independently on follow-up scans by two other experienced radiologists, blinded for the quantitative margin analysis. A sample size of 189 tumors (~ 145 patients) is required to show with 80% power that the risk of local recurrence is confidently below 10%. A two-sided binomial z-test will be used to test the null hypothesis that the local recurrence rate is ≥ 10% for patients with a minimal ablation margin ≥ 2 mm. Logistic regression will be used to find the relationship between minimal ablation margins and local recurrence. Kaplan–Meier estimates are used to assess local and overall recurrence, disease-free and overall survival. Discussion It is expected that this study will result in a clear understanding of the correlation between ablation margins and local recurrence. Using co-registration software in future patients undergoing ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma may improve intraprocedural evaluation of technical success. Trial registration The Netherlands Trial Register (NL9713), https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo T M Oosterveer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Gonnie C M van Erp
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Broersen
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan G Overduin
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carla S P van Rijswijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten E Tushuizen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs A J Urlings
- Department of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey P B M Braak
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bianca van Duijn-de Vreugd
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle J Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jouke Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Broekhoven AGC, Fiocco M, Sprengers D, Takkenberg RB, van Meer S, van Erpecum KJ, Ramsoekh D, Verspaget HW, Burgmans MC, Osanto S, Baranski AG, van Hoek B, Coenraad MJ. Real-life data on the impact of successful downstaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A Dutch Multicenter Study. Eur J Intern Med 2022; 97:56-61. [PMID: 34952770 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) theoretically are an excellent group to consider downstaging using locoregional therapy (LRT) since they do not have extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion. Once successful, this can change the treatment strategy from palliative to curative intention. Although downstaging therapy is suggested in guidelines, it is still not widely accepted. Moreover, studies on downstaging are mainly performed in high-incidence HCC countries. Therefore, our aim was to gain insight in therapeutic strategies in patients with intermediate stage HCC and their impact on intention-to-treat survival in a real-life setting in a low-incidence HCC country. We retrospectively analyzed data from the national Dutch HCC registry. From this database, consisting of 1409 patients with a diagnosis of HCC between 2005-2013 in 5 Dutch tertiary referral centers, we identified 165 patients with intermediate stage HCC. Out of these patients, 63 (38%) were not offered LRT, whereas 102 (62%) did receive LRT. Subsequently, 50 (49%) of the 102 patients who received LRT were successfully downstaged. Eleven patients (22% of successfully downstaged patients) eventually underwent liver transplantation. Cox regression analysis showed that a lower MELD score, an AFP value <100 ng/ml, successful downstaging and liver transplantation (all ≤p = 0.01) were positively associated to overall survival. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that LRT is not routinely offered to intermediate stage HCC patients in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, we showed that patients with intermediate stage HCC who are successfully downstaged have a survival benefit compared to those who were not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelotte G C Broekhoven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Bart Takkenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne van Meer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karel J van Erpecum
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hein W Verspaget
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrzej G Baranski
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bart van Hoek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meijer TS, Dieters JHN, de Leede EM, de Geus-Oei LF, Vuijk J, Martini CH, van Erkel AR, Lutjeboer J, van der Meer RW, Tijl FGJ, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL, Burgmans MC. Prospective evaluation of percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan as a treatment for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261939. [PMID: 35025911 PMCID: PMC8758076 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) is increasingly used in patients with liver metastases from various primary tumors, yet data on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are limited. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of M-PHP in patients with CRLM. Materials and methods Prospective, single-center, single-arm phase II study of M-PHP with hemofiltration in patients with unresectable CRLM. Proven, extrahepatic metastatic disease was one of the exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR) and best overall response (BOR). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety. Results A total of 14 M-PHP procedures were performed in eight patients between March 2014 and December 2015. All patients (median age 56 years, ranging from 46 to 68) had received (extensive) systemic chemotherapy before entering the study. The ORR was 25.0%, with two out of eight patients showing partial response as BOR. Median OS was 17.3 months (ranging from 2.6 to 30.9) with a one-year OS of 50.0%. Median PFS and hPFS were 4.4 and 4.5 months, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were observed in the majority of patients, though all were transient and well-manageable. Conclusion M-PHP is a safe procedure with only limited efficacy in patients with unresectable CRLM who already showed progression of disease after receiving one or more systemic treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Jan H. N. Dieters
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora M. de Leede
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Vuijk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian H. Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R. van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fred G. J. Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hendriks P, Sudiono DR, Schaapman JJ, Coenraad MJ, Tushuizen ME, Takkenberg RB, Oosterveer TTM, de Geus-Oei LF, van Delden OM, Burgmans MC. Thermal ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: What is the right treatment sequence? Eur J Radiol 2021; 144:110006. [PMID: 34717187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination treatment regimen of thermal ablation (TA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has gained a place in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions > 3 cm unsuitable for surgery. Despite a high heterogeneity in the currently used treatment protocols, the pooled results of combined treatments seem to outperform those of TA or TACE alone. TACE preceding TA has been studied extensively, while results of the reverse treatment sequence are lacking. In this retrospective cohort study we compared the two treatment sequences. PATIENTS AND METHODS 38 patients (median age: 68.5 yrs (range 40-84), male: 34, liver cirrhosis: 33, early stage HCC: 21, intermediate stage HCC: 17) were included in two tertiary referral centers, of whom 27 were treated with TA and adjuvant TACE (TA + TACE). The other 11 patients received TA with neoadjuvant TACE (TACE + TA). Overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and local tumor progression (LTP) free survival were determined for the entire cohort and compared between the two treatment sequences. RESULTS The median OS of all patients was 52.7 months and the median time to LTP was 11.5 months (censored for liver transplantation). No differences were found with respect to OS between the two treatment sequences. Median time to LTP for TACE + TA was 23.6 months and 8.1 months for TA + TACE (p = 0.19). DISCUSSION No statistical differences were found for OS, TTP and time to LTP between patients treated with TA combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - D R Sudiono
- Department of Radiology, NWZ Hospital Group, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - J J Schaapman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M E Tushuizen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R B Takkenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T T M Oosterveer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - L F de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, the Netherlands
| | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Görgec B, Hansen I, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bisschops RHC, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk V, De Boer MT, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, Gielkens H, Grünhagen DJ, Gillardin P, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kruimer JWH, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Morone M, Pennings JP, Peringa J, Te Riele WW, Vermaas M, Wicherts D, Willemssen FEJA, Zonderhuis BM, Bossuyt PMM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. Clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): study protocol for an international multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1116. [PMID: 34663243 PMCID: PMC8524830 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging method for patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the diagnostic workup for surgery or thermal ablation. Diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver is increasingly used to improve the detection rate and characterization of liver lesions. MRI is superior in detection and characterization of CRLM as compared to CT. However, it is unknown how MRI actually impacts patient management. The primary aim of the CAMINO study is to evaluate whether MRI has sufficient clinical added value to be routinely added to CT in the staging of CRLM. The secondary objective is to identify subgroups who benefit the most from additional MRI. METHODS In this international multicentre prospective incremental diagnostic accuracy study, 298 patients with primary or recurrent CRLM scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation based on CT staging will be enrolled from 17 centres across the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. All study participants will undergo CT and diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid enhanced MRI prior to local therapy. The local multidisciplinary team will provide two local therapy plans: first, based on CT-staging and second, based on both CT and MRI. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of clinically significant CRLM (CS-CRLM) detected by MRI not visible on CT. CS-CRLM are defined as liver lesions leading to a change in local therapeutical management. If MRI detects new CRLM in segments which would have been resected in the original operative plan, these are not considered CS-CRLM. It is hypothesized that MRI will lead to the detection of CS-CRLM in ≥10% of patients which is considered the minimal clinically important difference. Furthermore, a prediction model will be developed using multivariable logistic regression modelling to evaluate the predictive value of patient, tumor and procedural variables on finding CS-CRLM on MRI. DISCUSSION The CAMINO study will clarify the clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients with CRLM scheduled for local therapy. This study will provide the evidence required for the implementation of additional MRI in the routine work-up of patients with primary and recurrent CRLM for local therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION The CAMINO study was registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register under number NL8039 on September 20th 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - E J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H C Bisschops
- Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V Cappendijk
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M T De Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Gillardin
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J W H Kruimer
- Department of Radiology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - D J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - B Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - M Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - J P Pennings
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - D Wicherts
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - F E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Å A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Woei‐A‐Jin FSH, Weijl NI, Burgmans MC, Fariña Sarasqueta A, van Wezel JT, Wasser MN, Coenraad MJ, Burggraaf J, Osanto S. Neoadjuvant Treatment with Angiogenesis-Inhibitor Dovitinib Prior to Local Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase II Study. Oncologist 2021; 26:854-864. [PMID: 34251745 PMCID: PMC8488766 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence rates following locoregional treatment are high. As multireceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) are effective in advanced HCC, we assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant systemic treatment with dovitinib in early- and intermediate-stage HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four patients with modified Child-Pugh class A early- and intermediate-stage HCC received neoadjuvant oral dovitinib 500 mg daily (5 days on/2 days off) for 4 weeks, followed by locoregional therapy. Primary endpoints were objective response rates and intratumoral blood flow changes. Secondary endpoints were safety, pharmacodynamical plasma markers of VEGFR-blockade, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Modified RECIST overall response rate was 48%, including 13% complete remission, and despite dose reduction/interruption in 83% of patients, intratumoral perfusion index decreased significantly. Grade 3-4 adverse events, most frequently (on-target) hypertension (54%), fatigue (25%), and thrombocytopenia (21%), occurred in 88% of patients. Plasma VEGF-A, VEGF-D, and placental growth factor increased significantly, whereas sTie-2 decreased, consistent with VEGFR-blockade. Following neoadjuvant dovitinib, all patients could proceed to their original planned locoregional treatment. No delayed toxicity occurred. Seven patients (three early, four intermediate stage) underwent orthotopic liver transplant after median 11.4 months. Censoring at transplantation, median TTP and OS were 16.8 and 34.8 months respectively; median cancer-specific survival was not reached. CONCLUSION Already after a short 4-week dovitinib treatment period, intratumoral blood flow reduction and modest antitumor responses were observed. Although these results support use of systemic neoadjuvant strategies, the poor tolerability indicates that dovitinib dose adaptations are required in HCC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Orthotopic liver transplantation may cure early and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Considering the expected waiting time >6 months because of donor liver scarcity, there is an unmet need for effective neoadjuvant downsizing strategies. Angiogenesis inhibition by dovitinib does not negatively affect subsequent invasive procedures, is safe to administer immediately before locoregional therapy, and may provide a novel treatment approach to improve patient outcomes if tolerability in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can be improved by therapeutic drug monitoring and personalized dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F.J. Sherida H. Woei‐A‐Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden,Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden
| | - Nir I. Weijl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - J. Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Minneke J. Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden,Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meershoek P, van den Berg NS, Lutjeboer J, Burgmans MC, van der Meer RW, van Rijswijk CSP, van Oosterom MN, van Erkel AR, van Leeuwen FWB. Assessing the value of volume navigation during ultrasound-guided radiofrequency- and microwave-ablations of liver lesions. Eur J Radiol Open 2021; 8:100367. [PMID: 34286051 PMCID: PMC8273361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of our study was to determine the influence of ultrasound (US)-coupled volume navigation on the use of computed tomography (CT) during minimally-invasive radiofrequency and microwave ablation procedures of liver lesions. Method Twenty-five patients with 40 liver lesions of different histological origin were retrospectively analysed. Lesions were ablated following standard protocol, using 1) conventional US-guidance, 2) manual registered volume navigation (mVNav), 3) automatic registered (aVNav) or 4) CT-guidance. In case of ultrasonographically inconspicuous lesions, conventional US-guidance was abandoned and mVNav was used. If mVNav was also unsuccessful, the procedure was either continued with aVNav or CT-guidance. The number, size and location of the lesions targeted using the different approaches were documented. Results Of the 40 lesions, sixteen (40.0 %) could be targeted with conventional US-guidance only, sixteen (40.0 %) with mVNav, three (7.5 %) with aVNav and five (12.5 %) only through the use of CT-guidance. Of the three alternatives (mVNav, aVNav and CT only) the mean size of the lesions targeted using mVNav (9.1 ± 4.6 mm) was significantly smaller from those targeted using US-guidance only (20.4 ± 9.4 mm; p < 0.001). The location of the lesions did not influence the selection of the modality used to guide the ablation. Conclusions In our cohort, mVNav allowed the ablation procedure to become less dependent on the use of CT. mVNav supported the ablation of lesions smaller than those that could be ablated with US only and doubled the application of minimally-invasive US-guided ablations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Meershoek
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke S van den Berg
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina S P van Rijswijk
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patel A, Irani FG, Pua U, Tay KH, Chong TT, Leong S, Chan ESY, Tan GWL, Burgmans MC, Zhuang KD, Quek LHH, Kwan J, Damodharan K, Gogna A, Tan BP, Too CW, Chan SXJM, Chng SP, Yuan W, Tan BS. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Critical Limb Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial. Radiology 2021; 300:715-724. [PMID: 34227886 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background There is a paucity of randomized trials demonstrating superior efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) compared with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for below-the-knee arterial disease in patients with -critical limb ischemia. Purpose To compare DCBA versus PTA for below-the-knee lesions in participants with critical limb ischemia through 12 months. Materials and Methods In this prospective, randomized, two-center, double-blind superiority study, participants with critical limb ischemia with rest pain or tissue loss with atherosclerotic disease in the native below-the-knee arteries were randomly assigned (in a one-to-one ratio) to DCBA or PTA after stratification for diabetes and renal failure between November 2013 and October 2017. The primary efficacy end point was angiographic primary patency at 6 months analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary end points through 12 months were composed of major adverse events including death and major amputations, wound healing, limb salvage, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization, and amputation-free survival. Primary and binary secondary end points, analyzed by using generalized-linear model and time-to-event analyses, were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hazard ratios (Cox regression). Results Seventy participants (mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 43 men) in the DCBA group and 68 (mean age, 64 years ± 10; 50 men) in the PTA group were evaluated. The percentage of patients with angiographic primary patency at 6 months was 43% (30 of 70) in the DCBA group and 38% (26 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .48). Through 12 months, the percentage of deaths was similar: 21% in the DCBA group and 16% in the PTA group (P = .43). Amputation-free survival rate assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves differed through 12 months: 59% (41 of 70) in the DCBA group compared with 78% (53 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .01). Conclusion In participants with critical limb ischemia, the drug-coated balloon angioplasty group and the conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group had similar primary patency rates at 6 months after treatment of below-the-knee arteries. Amputation-free survival rates through 12 months were higher in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Patel
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Farah G Irani
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Uei Pua
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Kiang Hiong Tay
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Tze Tec Chong
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Sum Leong
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Edwin Shih-Yen Chan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Glenn Wei Leong Tan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Kun Da Zhuang
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Lawrence Han Hwee Quek
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Justin Kwan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Karthikeyan Damodharan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Apoorva Gogna
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Bien Peng Tan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Chow Wei Too
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Shaun X Ju Min Chan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Siew Ping Chng
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Wei Yuan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| | - Bien Soo Tan
- From the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences (A.P., F.G.I., K.H.T., S.L., K.D.Z., K.D., A.G., C.W.T., S.X.J.M.C., B.S.T.), and Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology (T.T.C., S.P.C.), Singapore General Hospital, Radiological Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Singhealth-Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Outram Road, Singapore 169608; Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (U.P., L.H.H.Q., J.K., B.P.T.) and General Surgery (G.W.L.T.), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Department of Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore (E.S.Y.C., W.Y.); and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands (M.C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Elfrink AKE, Nieuwenhuizen S, van den Tol MP, Burgmans MC, Prevoo W, Coolsen MME, van den Boezem PB, van Delden OM, Hagendoorn J, Patijn GA, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Rijken AM, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann KFD, Ruiter SJS, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Kok NFM, Meijerink MR, Swijnenburg RJ. Hospital variation in combined liver resection and thermal ablation for colorectal liver metastases and impact on short-term postoperative outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:827-839. [PMID: 33218949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining resection and thermal ablation can improve short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assessed nationwide hospital variation and short-term postoperative outcomes after combined resection and ablation. METHODS In this population-based study, all CRLM patients who underwent resection in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were included. After propensity score matching for age, ASA-score, Charlson-score, diameter of largest CRLM, number of CRLM and earlier resection, postoperative outcomes were compared. Postoperative complicated course (PCC) was defined as discharge after 14 days or a major complication or death within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Of 4639 included patients, 3697 (80%) underwent resection and 942 (20%) resection and ablation. Unadjusted percentage of patients who underwent resection and ablation per hospital ranged between 4 and 44%. Hospital variation persisted after case-mix correction. After matching, 734 patients remained in each group. Hospital stay (median 6 vs. 7 days, p = 0.011), PCC (11% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.043) and 30-day mortality (0.7% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.018) were lower in the resection and ablation group. Differences faded in multivariable logistic regression due to inclusion of major hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Significant hospital variation was observed in the Netherlands. Short-term postoperative outcomes were better after combined resection and ablation, attributed to avoiding complications associated with major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Petrousjka van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Warner Prevoo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Center, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tong TM, Burgmans MC, Van der Kooij M, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, van den Bosch S, Jonker MA, Roozen IC, Lutjeboer J, Rijksen F, van Persijn-van Meerten EL, Martini CH, Zoethout RW, Tijl FG, Blank CU, Kapiteijn E. Phase Ib/randomized phase II study combining hepatic percutaneous perfusion with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma: The CHOPIN trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps9595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS9595 Background: Uveal Melanoma (UM), although rare, is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Despite successful treatment of the primary tumor, approximately half of all patients will develop metastatic disease, mainly in the liver. Prognosis of metastatic UM is poor and overall survival (OS) has not improved over the last 30 years. Effective systemic therapies are lacking but recent literature suggests an improved effect of the combination of immunotherapy with ipilimumab/nivolumab (IPI/NIVO) as opposed to monotherapy. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a liver-directed therapy that allows delivery of a high dose of melphalan to the liver with limited systemic toxicity. Efficacy of PHP has been demonstrated in phase II trials including patients with liver-dominant or liver-only metastases. In this study we combine PHP with IPI/NIVO with the goal of inducing a synergistic effect and improving disease control. The aim of the phase 1b is to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IPI/NIVO when combined with PHP. The following randomized phase II trial aims to determine the efficacy of IPI/NIVO combined with PHP, compared to PHP alone. Methods: We initiated a prospective, single center, phase Ib and randomized phase II trial with a maximum of 88 patients in total. Patients with confirmed measurable hepatic UM metastases according to RECIST 1.1 and WHO performance score of 0-1 are included. Exclusion criteria are age > 75 years, treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication and prior systemic treatment for metastasic UM. Phase Ib is a dose-escalation study consisting of two cohorts. The dose of IPI and NIVO is increased from 1mg/kg and 1mg/kg in cohort 1, to 1mg/kg and 3mg/kg, in cohort 2, respectively. The melphalan dose for the PHP is 3mg/kg (maximum dose of 220mg) in both cohorts. Treatment duration is 12 weeks consisting of 4 courses of IPI/NIVO with 2 PHP's in week 1 and 7. In phase II, the same treatment scheme as phase Ib is used in the treatment arm combining IPI/NIVO with PHP at the established MTD. The second treatment arm consists of 2 PHP's performed at a 6 week interval. Follow-up includes laboratory tests, CT-chest/abdomen and MRI-liver. Safety and toxicity are assessed according to the CTCAE V5.0. Radiological response is assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST. Primary objective of phase Ib is to determine safety of the combination of IPI/NIVO with PHP defined by the MTD. In phase II the primary objective is the efficacy of combination treatment of IPI/NIVO with PHP defined by progression-free survival at one year. Secondary objectives include OS and overall response rate. Cohort 1 and 2 of phase Ib have been completed without dose limiting toxicities and the MTD is defined as IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg. Accrual to phase II started in December 2020. An update will be presented at ASCO 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04283890.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs M.L. Tong
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology/Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mark C. Burgmans
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Monique Van der Kooij
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frank M. Speetjens
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Arian R. van Erkel
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Shelley van den Bosch
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mare A. Jonker
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Inge C.F.M. Roozen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Fenna Rijksen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Chris H. Martini
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Remco W.M. Zoethout
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Fred G.J. Tijl
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Christian U. Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reinders MTM, van Meer S, Burgmans MC, de Jong KP, Klümpen HJ, de Man RA, Ramsoekh DS, Sprengers D, Tjwa ETTL, de Vos-Geelen J, van Erpecum KJ, van der Geest LGM. Trends in incidence, diagnosis, treatment and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in a low-incidence country: Data from the Netherlands in the period 2009-2016. Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:214-223. [PMID: 32799035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the trends in incidence, diagnostics, treatment and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Netherlands. METHOD Data regarding incidence, diagnostics, primary treatment and survival of patients with HCC in the period 2009-2016 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in incidence, diagnostics, various treatment modalities (except liver transplantation, due to inaccurate data) and regional treatment preferences were analysed. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modelling. RESULTS In the period of 2009-2016, 3838 patients were diagnosed with HCC. A distinct decrease in the percentage of patients who underwent tumour biopsy was observed (from 51% in 2009-2010 to 42% in 2015-2016). Percentage of patients who underwent cancer treatment increased markedly (from 49% in 2009-2010 to 57% in 2015-2016), mainly because of an increasing use of resection and ablation. The number of hospitals where resections were performed or sorafenib treatment prescribed decreased slightly. The number of hospitals sporadically (<1 ablation per year) performing ablations increased. There were significant differences between regions in the application of resection, ablation and transarterial chemoembolisation /radioembolisation (p < 0.05 after 'case mix'-correction). One-, 3- and 5-year survival of patients with HCC significantly improved in the studied period. Receiving cancer treatment was associated with increased survival, whereas increasing age and an advanced tumour stage were both associated with decreased survival. CONCLUSION From 2009 to 2016, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma more often received cancer treatment and their survival improved. There were significant differences in types of treatment between various regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot T M Reinders
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne van Meer
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam Zuidoost, the Netherlands.
| | - Robert A de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - D Sandjai Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Eric T T L Tjwa
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Karel J van Erpecum
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Lydia G M van der Geest
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, P.O. Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Meijer TS, Burgmans MC, de Leede EM, de Geus-Oei LF, Boekestijn B, Handgraaf HJM, Hilling DE, Lutjeboer J, Vuijk J, Martini CH, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Tijl FGJ, Speetjens FM, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Ocular Melanoma Metastases Confined to the Liver: A Prospective Phase II Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1130-1141. [PMID: 32761328 PMCID: PMC7801354 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08741-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Ocular melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy and has a very poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The
aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) using the new second-generation
(GEN 2) hemofiltration system in patients with ocular melanoma metastases confined to the liver. Methods Prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase II study including patients with unresectable ocular melanoma metastases confined to the liver. Treatment consisted of two M-PHP procedures at 6–8 weeks interval. Procedures were performed using the CHEMOSAT (GEN 2) system with 3 mg/kg
melphalan. Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and best overall response (BOR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety. Results Sixty-four M-PHP procedures were performed in 35 patients between February 2014 and June 2017. The ORR was 72%. BOR was as follows: complete response in 3%, partial response in 69%, stable disease in 13%, and progressive disease in 16%. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fourteen serious adverse events occurred. At a median follow-up of 19.1 months (range 5.6–69.5), median OS was 19.1 months and was significantly longer in responders than in nonresponders (27.5 vs. 11.9 months, p < 0.001). The 1- and 2-year OS was 77% and 43%, respectively. PFS and hPFS were 7.6 and 11.2 months, respectively. Conclusions M-PHP using the GEN 2 filter can achieve a high ORR and prolonged survival in patients with liver-only ocular melanoma metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora M de Leede
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Vuijk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fred G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Meijer TS, Burgmans MC. ASO Author Reflections: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Hepatic Metastases from Ocular Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:820-821. [PMID: 32683632 PMCID: PMC7677285 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08806-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Elfrink AKE, Pool M, van der Werf LR, Marra E, Burgmans MC, Meijerink MR, den Dulk M, van den Boezem PB, Te Riele WW, Patijn GA, Wouters MWJM, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Gobardhan PD, Buis CI, Kuhlmann KFD, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Kok NFM. Preoperative imaging for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based study. BJS Open 2020; 4:605-621. [PMID: 32374497 PMCID: PMC7397351 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) preoperative imaging may include contrast‐enhanced (ce) MRI and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) PET–CT. This study assessed trends and variation between hospitals and oncological networks in the use of preoperative imaging in the Netherlands. Methods Data for all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were retrieved from a nationwide auditing database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess use of ceMRI, 18F‐FDG PET–CT and combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and trends in preoperative imaging and hospital and oncological network variation. Results A total of 4510 patients were included, of whom 1562 had ceMRI, 872 had 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and 1293 had combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT. Use of ceMRI increased over time (from 9·6 to 26·2 per cent; P < 0·001), use of 18F‐FDG PET–CT decreased (from 28·6 to 6·0 per cent; P < 0·001), and use of both ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT 16·9 per cent) remained stable. Unadjusted variation in the use of ceMRI, 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT ranged from 5·6 to 100 per cent between hospitals. After case‐mix correction, hospital and oncological network variation was found for all imaging modalities. Discussion Significant variation exists concerning the use of preoperative imaging for CRLM between hospitals and oncological networks in the Netherlands. The use of MRI is increasing, whereas that of 18F‐FDG PET–CT is decreasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K E Elfrink
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M Pool
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L R van der Werf
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Marra
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M den Dulk
- Departments of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - W W Te Riele
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - M W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - M S L Liem
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - C I Buis
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meijer TS, Geus-Oei LFD, Martini CH, Tijl FGJ, Sitsen ME, Erkel ARV, Meer RWVD, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL, Burgmans MC. Embolization of variant hepatic arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous hepatic perfusion for unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 25:451-458. [PMID: 31650973 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.18138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients undergoing percutaneous liver perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP), the presence of variant hepatic arteries (HAs) may require catheter repositioning and thus prolong procedure time. Coil-embolization of variant HAs may enable M-PHP with a single catheter position as occlusion of variant HAs results in redistribution of flow through preexisting intrahepatic arterial collaterals. We aimed to evaluate whether redistribution of flow has any negative effect on therapeutic response in ocular melanoma patients undergoing M-PHP. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed pretreatment angiograms in all 32 patients that underwent M-PHP between January 2014 and March 2017 for unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma. Patients that underwent embolization of a variant left HA (LHA) or middle HA (MHA) during pretreatment angiography followed by at least one technically successful M-PHP were included for further analysis. Redistribution of arterial flow was evaluated on angiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. In each patient, tumor response in liver segments with redistributed blood flow was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, and then compared with tumor response in segments without flow redistribution. Follow-up scans were reviewed to evaluate progression of liver metastases. RESULTS A total of 12 patients were included. Replaced LHA embolization resulted in redistribution of flow to segment(s) 2 (n=3), 2 and 3 (n=5), and 2, 3 and 4 (n=2). MHA embolization resulted in redistribution of flow to segment 4 (n=2). Successful redistribution was confirmed by angiography and/or CBCT in all patients. Tumor response was similar for redistributed and non-redistributed liver segments in 8 out of 9 patients (89%) according to RECIST 1.1, and in 7 out of 8 patients (88%) according to mRECIST. In three patients, tumor response was not evaluable according to RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST as metastases were too small to be categorized as target lesions (n=1), or target lesions were confined to non-redistributed segments (n=2). In one patient, tumor response was not evaluable according to mRECIST as target lesions in the redistributed segments were hypovascular. After a median follow-up time of 17.1 months (range, 9.1-38.5 months), hepatic progression was seen in 9 out of 12 patients with a median time to progression of 9.9 months (range, 2.5-17.7 months). Progression of liver metastases was never seen only in the redistributed liver segments. CONCLUSION Flow redistribution in liver segments by coil-embolization of variant HAs is a feasible technique that does not seem to compromise tumor response in patients undergoing M-PHP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fred G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Elske Sitsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sibinga Mulder BG, Hendriks P, Baetens TR, van Erkel AR, van Rijswijk CSP, van der Meer RW, van de Velde CJH, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD, Burgmans MC. Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study. BMC Med Imaging 2019; 19:71. [PMID: 31429708 PMCID: PMC6700773 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Compared to surgery, radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM) is associated with higher local recurrence(LR) rates. A wide margin (at least 5 mm) is generally recommended to prevent LR, but the optimal method to assess ablation margins is yet to be established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of CT-CT co-registration, using MIRADA software, in order to assess ablation margins of patients with CRLM. Methods In this retrospective study, pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT scans of 29 patients, treated with percutaneous RFA for a solitary CRLM, were co-registered. Co-registration was performed by two independent radiologist, based on venous structures in proximity to the tumor. Feasibility of CT-CT co-registration and inter-observer agreement for reproducibility and ablation margins was determined. Furthermore, the minimal ablation margin was compared with the occurrence of LR during follow-up. Results Co-registration was considered feasible in 18 patients (61% male, 63.1(±10.9) year), with a perfect inter-observer agreement for completeness of ablation: κ = 1.0(p < 0.001). And substantial inter-observer agreement for measurement of the minimal margin (≤ 0 mm, 1-5 mm, ≥ 5 mm): κ = 0.723(p-value < 0.001). LR occurred in eight of nine(88.9%) incompletely ablated CRLM and in one of the nine completely ablated CRLM(11.1%). Conclusion Co-registration using MIRADA is reproducible and potentially a valuable tool in defining technical success. Feasibility of co-registration of pre- and post-ablation CT scans is suboptimal if scans are not acquired concordantly. Co-registration may potentially aid in the prediction of LR after percutaneous ablation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Sibinga Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T R Baetens
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C S P van Rijswijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sibinga Mulder BG, Visser K, Feshtali S, Vahrmeijer AL, Swijnenburg RJ, Hartgrink HH, van den Boom R, Burgmans MC, Mieog JSD. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging significantly influences the clinical course in patients with colorectal liver metastases. BMC Med Imaging 2018; 18:44. [PMID: 30442100 PMCID: PMC6238306 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-018-0289-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gadoxetic acid (Primovist™)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (P-MRI) scans have higher accuracy and increased detection of small colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) compared to CT scans or conventional MRI scans. But, P-MRI scans are still inconsistently acquired in the diagnostic work up of patients with CRLM. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of P-MRI scans on treatment plan proposition and subsequently the clinical course of the patient. Methods Eighty-three consecutive patients with potentially resectable CRLM based on a conventional CT scan underwent P-MRI scanning prior to treatment. Treatment plans proposed by the multidisciplinary team were compared before and after P-MRI scanning and related to the final treatment and diagnosis, the accuracy for the CT scan and P-MRI scan was calculated. Results P-MRI scans led to a change of treatment in 15 patients (18%) and alteration of extensiveness of local therapy in another 17 patients (20%). All changes were justified leading to an accuracy of 93% for treatment proposition based on P-MRI scan, compared to an accuracy of 75% for the CT scan. Conclusions P-MRI scans provide additional information that can aid in proposing the most suitable treatment for patients with CRLM and might prevent short-term reintervention. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-018-0289-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Sibinga Mulder
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - K Visser
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - S Feshtali
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - A L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - R van den Boom
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Karkampouna S, van der Helm D, Gray PC, Chen L, Klima I, Grosjean J, Burgmans MC, Farina-Sarasqueta A, Snaar-Jagalska EB, Stroka DM, Terracciano L, van Hoek B, Schaapherder AF, Osanto S, Thalmann GN, Verspaget HW, Coenraad MJ, Kruithof-de Julio M. CRIPTO promotes an aggressive tumour phenotype and resistance to treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Pathol 2018; 245:297-310. [PMID: 29604056 DOI: 10.1002/path.5083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite increasing treatment options for this disease, prognosis remains poor. CRIPTO (TDGF1) protein is expressed at high levels in several human tumours and promotes oncogenic phenotype. Its expression has been correlated to poor prognosis in HCC. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the basis for the effects of CRIPTO in HCC. We investigated CRIPTO expression levels in three cohorts of clinical cirrhotic and HCC specimens. We addressed the role of CRIPTO in hepatic tumourigenesis using Cre-loxP-controlled lentiviral vectors expressing CRIPTO in cell line-derived xenografts. Responses to standard treatments (sorafenib, doxorubicin) were assessed directly on xenograft-derived ex vivo tumour slices. CRIPTO-overexpressing patient-derived xenografts were established and used for ex vivo drug response assays. The effects of sorafenib and doxorubicin treatment in combination with a CRIPTO pathway inhibitor were tested in ex vivo cultures of xenograft models and 3D cultures. CRIPTO protein was found highly expressed in human cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma specimens but not in those of healthy participants. Stable overexpression of CRIPTO in human HepG2 cells caused epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, increased expression of cancer stem cell markers, and enhanced cell proliferation and migration. HepG2-CRIPTO cells formed tumours when injected into immune-compromised mice, whereas HepG2 cells lacking stable CRIPTO overexpression did not. High-level CRIPTO expression in xenograft models was associated with resistance to sorafenib, which could be modulated using a CRIPTO pathway inhibitor in ex vivo tumour slices. Our data suggest that a subgroup of CRIPTO-expressing HCC patients may benefit from a combinatorial treatment scheme and that sorafenib resistance may be circumvented by inhibition of the CRIPTO pathway. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Karkampouna
- Department of Biomedical Research, Urology Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Danny van der Helm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C Gray
- Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lanpeng Chen
- Institute of Biology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Irena Klima
- Department of Biomedical Research, Urology Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joël Grosjean
- Department of Biomedical Research, Urology Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ewa B Snaar-Jagalska
- Institute of Biology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Deborah M Stroka
- Department of Biomedical Research, Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Luigi Terracciano
- Molecular Pathology Division, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bart van Hoek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Susan Osanto
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Biomedical Research, Urology Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Hein W Verspaget
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Minneke J Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marianna Kruithof-de Julio
- Department of Biomedical Research, Urology Group, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Spa SJ, Welling MM, van Oosterom MN, Rietbergen DDD, Burgmans MC, Verboom W, Huskens J, Buckle T, van Leeuwen FWB. A Supramolecular Approach for Liver Radioembolization. Theranostics 2018; 8:2377-2386. [PMID: 29721086 PMCID: PMC5928896 DOI: 10.7150/thno.23567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatic radioembolization therapies can suffer from discrepancies between diagnostic planning (scout-scan) and the therapeutic delivery itself, resulting in unwanted side-effects such as pulmonary shunting. We reasoned that a nanotechnology-based pre-targeting strategy could help overcome this shortcoming by directly linking pre-interventional diagnostics to the local delivery of therapy. Methods: The host-guest interaction between adamantane and cyclodextrin was employed in an in vivo pre-targeting set-up. Adamantane (guest)-functionalized macro albumin aggregates (MAA-Ad; d = 18 μm) and (radiolabeled) Cy5 and β-cyclodextrin (host)-containing PIBMA polymers (99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39; MW ~ 18.8 kDa) functioned as the reactive pair. Following liver or lung embolization with (99mTc)-MAA-Ad or (99mTc)-MAA (control), the utility of the pre-targeting concept was evaluated after intravenous administration of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39. Results: Interactions between MAA-Ad and Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 could be monitored in solution using confocal microscopy and were quantified by radioisotope-based binding experiments. In vivo the accumulation of the MAA-Ad particles in the liver or lungs yielded an approximate ten-fold increase in accumulation of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 in these organs (16.2 %ID/g and 10.5 %ID/g, respectively) compared to the control. Pre-targeting with MAA alone was shown to be only half as efficient. Uniquely, for the first time, this data demonstrates that the formation of supramolecular interactions between cyclodextrin and adamantane can be used to drive complex formation in the chemically challenging in vivo environment. Conclusion: The in vivo distribution pattern of the cyclodextrin host could be guided by the pre-administration of the adamantane guest, thereby creating a direct link between the scout-scan (MAA-Ad) and delivery of therapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
de Leede EM, Burgmans MC, Meijer TS, Martini CH, Tijl FGJ, Vuyk J, van Erkel AR, van der Velde CJH, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL. Erratum to: Prospective Clinical and Pharmacological Evaluation of the Delcath System's Second-Generation (GEN2) Hemofiltration System in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40:1966. [PMID: 28840267 PMCID: PMC5656698 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1766-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora M de Leede
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - T Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fred G J Tijl
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Vuyk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J H van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tham WP, Burgmans MC, Tan BS, Tay KH, Irani FG, Gogna A, Patel A, Lo RHG, Chng SP, Choong HL, Chan SXJM. Percutaneous Endovascular Treatment to Salvage Non-Maturing Arteriovenous Fistulas in a Multiethnic Asian Population. Ann Acad Med Singap 2017. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v46n2p64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred method for haemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure. Previous studies have shown value in attempting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to salvage AVFs that fail to mature, but they are relatively small in size and mainly reported in Western populations. We reviewed our data of PTA in non-maturing AVFs to establish whether this technique is translatable to our local multiethnic population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and procedural images of 105 patients who had PTA for non-maturing AVFs performed at our department from January 2008 to January 2011. Technical success was defined as ≤30% residual stenosis after angioplasty. Clinical success was defined as at least 1 successful haemodialysis session within 4 weeks after PTA. Results: All 105 patients underwent angioplasty for at least 1 haemodynamically significant stenosis. Six (5.7%) had additional embolisation of accessory veins. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of cases. The clinical success rate was 76.2%. Primary patency rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were 83%, 45% and 28%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were 90%, 79% and 70%, respectively. The minor complication rate was 18.1%. No major complications were encountered. An average of 1.7 interventions per access-year was required to maintain AVF patency. Patients with a preoperative vein size >2.0 mm and age <55 years were more likely to achieve clinical success, although not statistically significant. Conclusion: PTA is a viable option to help salvage non-maturing AVFs in a multiethnic Asian population.
Key words: Angioplasty, Chronic renal disease, Haemodialysis, Interventional radiology
Collapse
|
37
|
Tham WP, Burgmans MC, Tan BS, Tay KH, Irani FG, Gogna A, Patel A, Lo RH, Chng SP, Choong HL, Chan SX. Percutaneous Endovascular Treatment to Salvage Non-Maturing Arteriovenous Fistulas in a Multiethnic Asian Population. Ann Acad Med Singap 2017; 46:64-71. [PMID: 28263343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred method for haemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure. Previous studies have shown value in attempting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to salvage AVFs that fail to mature, but they are relatively small in size and mainly reported in Western populations. We reviewed our data of PTA in non-maturing AVFs to establish whether this technique is translatable to our local multiethnic population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and procedural images of 105 patients who had PTA for non-maturing AVFs performed at our department from January 2008 to January 2011. Technical success was defined as ≤30% residual stenosis after angioplasty. Clinical success was defined as at least 1 successful haemodialysis session within 4 weeks after PTA. RESULTS All 105 patients underwent angioplasty for at least 1 haemodynamically significant stenosis. Six (5.7%) had additional embolisation of accessory veins. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of cases. The clinical success rate was 76.2%. Primary patency rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were 83%, 45% and 28%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were 90%, 79% and 70%, respectively. The minor complication rate was 18.1%. No major complications were encountered. An average of 1.7 interventions per access-year was required to maintain AVF patency. Patients with a preoperative vein size >2.0 mm and age <55 years were more likely to achieve clinical success, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PTA is a viable option to help salvage non-maturing AVFs in a multiethnic Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ping Tham
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
de Leede EM, Burgmans MC, Martini CH, Tijl FGJ, van Erkel AR, Vuyk J, Kapiteijn E, Verhoef C, van de Velde CJH, Vahrmeijer AL. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver. J Vis Exp 2016. [PMID: 27501370 DOI: 10.3791/53795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer can be treated with systemic chemotherapy, aiming to limit the disease, extend survival or turn unresectable metastases into resectable ones. Some patients however, suffer from side effects or progression under systemic treatment. For patients with metastasized uveal melanoma there are no standard systemic therapy options. For patients without extrahepatic disease, isolated liver perfusion (IHP) may enable local disease control with limited systemic side effects. Previously, this was performed during open surgery with satisfying results, but morbidity and mortality related to the open procedure, prohibited a widespread application. Therefore, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with simultaneous chemofiltration was developed. Besides decreasing morbidity and mortality, this procedure can be repeated, hopefully leading to a higher response rate and improved survival (by local control of disease). During PHP, catheters are placed in the proper hepatic artery, to infuse the chemotherapeutic agent, and in the inferior caval vein to aspirate the chemosaturated blood returning through the hepatic veins. The caval vein catheter is a double balloon catheter that prohibits leakage into the systemic circulation. The blood returning from the hepatic veins is aspirated through the catheter fenestrations and then perfused through an extra-corporeal filtration system. After filtration, the blood is returned to the patient by a third catheter in the right internal jugular vein. During PHP a high dose of melphalan is infused into the liver, which is toxic and would lead to life threatening complications when administered systemically. Because of the significant hemodynamic instability resulting from the combination of caval vein occlusion and chemofiltration, hemodynamic monitoring and hemodynamic support is of paramount importance during this complex procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Fred G J Tijl
- Department of Extracorporeal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Centre
| | | | - Jaap Vuyk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ottevanger JW, van Rijswijk CSP, van Hoek B, Burgmans MC. Gastric Variceal Hemorrhage in a Noncirrhotic Patient Treated with Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38:1060-3. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-014-0942-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
40
|
Burgmans MC, van Erkel AR, Too CW, Coenraad M, Lo RHG, Tan BS. Pilot study evaluating catheter-directed contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to catheter-directed computed tomography arteriography as adjuncts to digital subtraction angiography to guide transarterial chemoembolization. Clin Radiol 2014; 69:1056-61. [PMID: 25017449 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the feasibility and procedural value of catheter-directed contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CCEUS) compared with catheter-directed computed tomography arteriography (CCTA) in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) guided by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2010 to December 2011, a pilot study was conducted including nine patients (mean age 66.6 years; SD 8.3 years; seven men) undergoing TACE with drug-eluting beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both CCEUS and CCTA were performed in addition to DSA. Alterations of treatment plan based on CCEUS were recorded and compared with CCTA. RESULTS CCEUS provided additional information to DSA altering the treatment plan in four out of nine patients (44.4%). In these four patients, CCEUS helped to identify additional tumour feeders (n = 2) or led to a change in catheter position (n = 2). The information provided by CCEUS was similar to that provided by CCTA. CONCLUSION CCEUS is a potentially valuable imaging tool in adjunction to DSA when performing TACE and may provide similar information to CCTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Burgmans
- Interventional Radiology Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C W Too
- Interventional Radiology Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - M Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R H G Lo
- Interventional Radiology Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - B S Tan
- Interventional Radiology Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kao YH, Steinberg JD, Tay YS, Lim GK, Yan J, Townsend DW, Budgeon CA, Boucek JA, Francis RJ, Cheo TS, Burgmans MC, Irani FG, Lo RH, Tay KH, Tan BS, Chow PK, Satchithanantham S, Tan AE, Ng DC, Goh AS. Post-radioembolization yttrium-90 PET/CT - part 2: dose-response and tumor predictive dosimetry for resin microspheres. EJNMMI Res 2013; 3:57. [PMID: 23885971 PMCID: PMC3733999 DOI: 10.1186/2191-219x-3-57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Coincidence imaging of low-abundance yttrium-90 (90Y) internal pair production by positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (PET/CT) achieves high-resolution imaging of post-radioembolization microsphere biodistribution. Part 2 analyzes tumor and non-target tissue dose-response by 90Y PET quantification and evaluates the accuracy of tumor 99mTc macroaggregated albumin (MAA) single-photon emission computed tomography with integrated CT (SPECT/CT) predictive dosimetry. Methods Retrospective dose quantification of 90Y resin microspheres was performed on the same 23-patient data set in part 1. Phantom studies were performed to assure quantitative accuracy of our time-of-flight lutetium-yttrium-oxyorthosilicate system. Dose-responses were analyzed using 90Y dose-volume histograms (DVHs) by PET voxel dosimetry or mean absorbed doses by Medical Internal Radiation Dose macrodosimetry, correlated to follow-up imaging or clinical findings. Intended tumor mean doses by predictive dosimetry were compared to doses by 90Y PET. Results Phantom studies demonstrated near-perfect detector linearity and high tumor quantitative accuracy. For hepatocellular carcinomas, complete responses were generally achieved at D70 > 100 Gy (D70, minimum dose to 70% tumor volume), whereas incomplete responses were generally at D70 < 100 Gy; smaller tumors (<80 cm3) achieved D70 > 100 Gy more easily than larger tumors. There was complete response in a cholangiocarcinoma at D70 90 Gy and partial response in an adrenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastasis at D70 53 Gy. In two patients, a mean dose of 18 Gy to the stomach was asymptomatic, 49 Gy caused gastritis, 65 Gy caused ulceration, and 53 Gy caused duodenitis. In one patient, a bilateral kidney mean dose of 9 Gy (V20 8%) did not cause clinically relevant nephrotoxicity. Under near-ideal dosimetric conditions, there was excellent correlation between intended tumor mean doses by predictive dosimetry and those by 90Y PET, with a low median relative error of +3.8% (95% confidence interval, -1.2% to +13.2%). Conclusions Tumor and non-target tissue absorbed dose quantification by 90Y PET is accurate and yields radiobiologically meaningful dose-response information to guide adjuvant or mitigative action. Tumor 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT predictive dosimetry is feasible. 90Y DVHs may guide future techniques in predictive dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Hsiang Kao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kao YH, Steinberg JD, Tay YS, Lim GK, Yan J, Townsend DW, Takano A, Burgmans MC, Irani FG, Teo TK, Yeow TN, Gogna A, Lo RH, Tay KH, Tan BS, Chow PK, Satchithanantham S, Tan AE, Ng DC, Goh AS. Post-radioembolization yttrium-90 PET/CT - part 1: diagnostic reporting. EJNMMI Res 2013; 3:56. [PMID: 23883566 PMCID: PMC3726297 DOI: 10.1186/2191-219x-3-56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Yttrium-90 (90Y) positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (PET/CT) represents a technological leap from 90Y bremsstrahlung single-photon emission computed tomography with integrated computed tomography (SPECT/CT) by coincidence imaging of low abundance internal pair production. Encouraged by favorable early experiences, we implemented post-radioembolization 90Y PET/CT as an adjunct to 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT in diagnostic reporting. Methods This is a retrospective review of all paired 90Y PET/CT and 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT scans over a 1-year period. We compared image resolution, ability to confirm technical success, detection of non-target activity, and providing conclusive information about 90Y activity within targeted tumor vascular thrombosis. 90Y resin microspheres were used. 90Y PET/CT was performed on a conventional time-of-flight lutetium-yttrium-oxyorthosilicate scanner with minor modifications to acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Specific findings on 90Y PET/CT were corroborated by 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT, 99mTc macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT, follow-up diagnostic imaging or review of clinical records. Results Diagnostic reporting recommendations were developed from our collective experience across 44 paired scans. Emphasis on the continuity of care improved overall diagnostic accuracy and reporting confidence of the operator. With proper technique, the presence of background noise did not pose a problem for diagnostic reporting. A counter-intuitive but effective technique of detecting non-target activity is proposed, based on the pattern of activity and its relation to underlying anatomy, instead of its visual intensity. In a sub-analysis of 23 patients with a median follow-up of 5.4 months, 90Y PET/CT consistently outperformed 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT in all aspects of qualitative analysis, including assessment for non-target activity and tumor vascular thrombosis. Parts of viscera closely adjacent to the liver remain challenging for non-target activity detection, compounded by a tendency for mis-registration. Conclusions Adherence to proper diagnostic reporting technique and emphasis on continuity of care are vital to the clinical utility of post-radioembolization 90Y PET/CT. 90Y PET/CT is superior to 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT for the assessment of target and non-target activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Hsiang Kao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Burgmans MC, Irani FG, Chan WY, Teo TK, Kao YH, Goh ASW, Chow PK, Lo RH. Radioembolization after portal vein embolization in a patient with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35:1519-23. [PMID: 22526101 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0376-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2011] [Accepted: 03/15/2012] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Radioembolization is an effective locoregional therapy for patients with intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has been shown that radioembolization is safe in patients with portal vein thrombosis. This case report describes safe radioembolization after portal vein embolization in a patient with multifocal HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Interventional Radiology Center, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Plaisier AS, Burgmans MC, Vonken EPA, Prakken NH, Cox MGPJ, Hauer RN, Velthuis BK, Cramer MJM. Image quality assessment of the right ventricle with three different delayed enhancement sequences in patients suspected of ARVC/D. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 28:595-601. [PMID: 21503703 PMCID: PMC3326369 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9871-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2010] [Accepted: 04/05/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Histopathologic findings in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) are replacement of the normal myocardium with fatty and fibrous elements with preferential involvement of the right ventricle. The right ventricular fibrosis can be visualised by post-gadolinium delayed enhancement inversion recovery imaging (DE imaging). We compared the image quality of three different gradient echo MRI sequences for short axis DE imaging of the right ventricle (RV). We retrospectively analysed MRI scans performed between February 2005 and December 2008 in 97 patients (mean age: 41.2 years, 67% men) suspected of ARVC/D. For DE imaging either a 2D Phase Sensitive (PSIR), a 2D (2D) or a 3D (3D) inversion recovery sequence was used in respectively 38, 32 and 27 MRI-examinations. The RV, divided in 10 segments, was assessed for image quality by two radiologists in random sequence. A consensus reading was performed if results differed between the two readings. Image quality was good in 24% of all segments in the 3D group, 66% in the 2D group and 79% in the PSIR group. Poor image quality was observed in 51% (3D), 10% (2D), and 2% (PSIR) of all segments. Exams were considered suitable for clinical use in 7% of exams in the 3D group, 75% of exams in the 2D group and 90% of exams of the PSIR group. Breathing-artifacts occurred in 22% (3D), 59% (2D) and 53% (PSIR). Motion-artifacts occurred in 56% (3D), 28% (2D) and 29% (PSIR). Post-gadolinium imaging using the PSIR sequence results in better and more consistent image quality of the RV compared to the 2D and 3D sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Plaisier
- Department of Radiology, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Burgmans MC, Rommes JH, Spronk PE, van Nidek RJPB, Bouma WH, Gratama JWC. Septic Thrombosis of the Inferior Vena Cava Treated with Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17:1697-702. [PMID: 17057014 DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000240734.93460.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The present report describes a patient with septic thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC) related to a subhepatic abscess adjacent to the IVC. Despite prolonged antimicrobial therapy and systemic anticoagulation, sepsis and septic embolism persisted while the size of the thrombus increased. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was performed, resulting in removal of the infected thrombus and complete clinical recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Gelre Hospitals, site Lukas, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334 DZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|