1
|
Dueland S, Syversveen T, Line PD. Resection Details, Donor Segment Volume, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Liver Transplant-Reply. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:350-351. [PMID: 37966832 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Görgec B, Hansen IS, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk VC, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, van Erkel AR, Gielkens HAJ, Grünhagen DJ, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kuhlmann K, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Meijerink M, Meyer Y, Morone M, Peringa J, Sijberden JP, van Delden OM, van den Bergh JE, Vanhooymissen IJS, Vermaas M, Willemssen FEJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. MRI in addition to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): an international, multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:137-146. [PMID: 38081200 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines are inconclusive on whether contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid and diffusion-weighted imaging should be added routinely to CT in the investigation of patients with colorectal liver metastases who are scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation, or both. Although contrast-enhanced MRI is reportedly superior than contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterisation of colorectal liver metastases, its effect on clinical patient management is unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI on local treatment plan in patients with colorectal liver metastases amenable to local treatment, based on contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS We did an international, multicentre, prospective, incremental diagnostic accuracy trial in 14 liver surgery centres in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histological proof of colorectal cancer, a WHO performance status score of 0-4, and primary or recurrent colorectal liver metastases, who were scheduled for local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. All patients had contrast-enhanced CT and liver contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid as a contrast agent before undergoing local therapy. The primary outcome was change in the local clinical treatment plan (decided by the individual clinics) on the basis of liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings, analysed in the intention-to-image population. The minimal clinically important difference in the proportion of patients who would have change in their local treatment plan due to an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI was 10%. This study is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL8039. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 325 patients with colorectal liver metastases were assessed for eligibility. 298 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population, including 177 males (59%) and 121 females (41%) with planned local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. A change in the local treatment plan based on liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings was observed in 92 (31%; 95% CI 26-36) of 298 patients. Changes were made for 40 patients (13%) requiring more extensive local therapy, 11 patients (4%) requiring less extensive local therapy, and 34 patients (11%) in whom the indication for curative-intent local therapy was revoked, including 26 patients (9%) with too extensive disease and eight patients (3%) with benign lesions on liver contrast-enhanced MRI (confirmed by a median follow-up of 21·0 months [IQR 17·5-24·0]). INTERPRETATION Liver contrast-enhanced MRI should be considered in all patients scheduled for local treatment for colorectal liver metastases on the basis of contrast-enhanced CT imaging. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society and Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunter Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hugo A J Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bart Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jan Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Inge J S Vanhooymissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grut H, Line PD, Syversveen T, Dueland S. Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET/CT in Combination with Radiologic Measurements to Predict Long-Term Survival Following Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:19. [PMID: 38201449 PMCID: PMC10777966 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to report on the ability of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of liver metastases from pre-transplant 18F-FDG PET/CT in combination with conventional radiological measurements from CT scans to predict long-term disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and survival after relapse (SAR) after liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. The total liver MTV was obtained from the 18F-FDG PET/CT, and the size of the largest metastasis and the total number of metastases were obtained from the CT. DFS, OS, and SAR for patients with a low and high MTV, in combination with a low and high size, number, and tumor burden score, were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Patients with a low number of metastases and low MTV had a significantly longer OS than those with a high MTV, with a median survival of 151 vs. 26 months (p = 0.010). Patients with a high number of metastases and low MTV had significantly longer DFS, OS, and SAR than patients with a high MTV (p = 0.034, 0.006, and 0.026). The tumor burden score of group/zone 3, in combination with a low MTV, had a significantly improved DFS, OS, and SAR compared to those with a high MTV (p = 0.034, <0.001, and 0.006). Patients with a low MTV of liver metastases had a long DFS, OS, and SAR despite a high number of liver metastases and a high tumor burden score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Grut
- Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, 3004 Drammen, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dueland S, Smedman TM, Syversveen T, Grut H, Hagness M, Line PD. Long-Term Survival, Prognostic Factors, and Selection of Patients With Colorectal Cancer for Liver Transplant: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:e232932. [PMID: 37494056 PMCID: PMC10372758 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Importance Liver transplant for colorectal cancer with liver metastases was abandoned in the 1990s due to poor overall survival. From 2006, liver transplant for in nonresectable colorectal liver metastases has been reexamined through different prospective trials. Objective To determine predictive factors for transplant long-term survival and cure after liver transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, nonrandomized controlled cohort study derived from different clinical trials on liver transplant for colorectal liver metastases from 2006 to 2020 at Oslo University Hospital. The trials differed in prognostic inclusion criteria, but the design was otherwise identical regarding follow-up scheme to determine disease recurrence, overall survival, and survival after relapse. Final data analysis was performed on December 31, 2021. All patients with colorectal liver metastases from comparable prospective liver transplant studies were included. Exposure Liver transplant. Main outcomes and measures Disease-free survival, overall survival, and survival time after recurrence were determined in all participants. Results A total of 61 patients (median [range] age, 57.8 [28.7-71.1] years; 35 male [57.4%]) underwent liver transplant at Oslo University Hospital. Posttransplant observation time ranged from 16 to 165 months, and no patient was lost to follow-up. Median disease-free period, overall survival, and survival after relapse were 11.8 (95% CI, 9.3-14.2) months, 60.3 (95% CI, 44.3-76.4) months, and 37.1 (95% CI, 4.6-69.5) months, respectively. Negative predictive factors for overall survival included the following: largest tumor size greater than 5.5 cm (median OS, 25.3 months; 95% CI, 15.8-34.8 months; P <.001), progressive disease while receiving chemotherapy (median OS, 39.8 months; 95% CI, 28.8-50.7 months; P = .02), plasma carcinoembryonic antigen values greater than 80 μg/L (median OS, 26.6 months; 95% CI, 22.7-30.6 months; P <.001), liver metabolic tumor volume on positron emission tomography of greater than 70 cm3 (26.6 months; 95% CI, 11.8-41.5 months; P <.001), primary tumor in the ascending colon (17.9 months; 95% CI, 0-37.5 months; P <.001), tumor burden score of 9 or higher (23.3 months; 95% CI, 19.2-27.4 months; P = .02), and 9 or more liver lesions (42.5 months; 95% CI, 17.2-67.8 months; P = .02). An Oslo score of 0 or Fong Clinical Risk Score of 1 yielded 10-year survival of 88.9% and 80.0%, respectively. Conclusions and relevance Results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that selected patients with liver-only metastases and favorable pretransplant prognostic scoring had long-term survival comparable with conventional indications for liver transplant, thus providing a potential curative treatment option in patients otherwise offered only palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Magnus Smedman
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Grut
- Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Morten Hagness
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Transplant Oncology Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dueland S, Smedman TM, Grut H, Syversveen T, Jørgensen LH, Line PD. PET-Uptake in Liver Metastases as Method to Predict Tumor Biological Behavior in Patients Transplanted for Colorectal Liver Metastases Developing Lung Recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205042. [PMID: 36291826 PMCID: PMC9599638 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the impact of PET uptake on liver metastases on overall survival (OS) after resection of pulmonary metastases in patients who had received liver transplantation (LT) due to unresectable colorectal liver-only metastases. Resection of pulmonary colorectal metastases is controversial. Some hospitals offer this treatment to selected patients, whereas other hospitals do not perform the procedure in colorectal cancer patients who develop pulmonary metastases. All patients included in the LT studies who developed pulmonary metastases as first site of relapse, and had resection of these as first treatment, were included in this report. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in liver was derived from the pre-transplant PET examinations. OS from time of resection was calculated by the Kaplan−Meier method. Patients with low MTV (<70 cm3) had significantly longer OS from time of resection of pulmonary metastases compared to patients with high MTV (>70 cm3). Patients with low MTV in the liver had 10-year OS from time of pulmonary resections of 86%. Liver MTV values from pre-transplant PET examinations may predict long OS in colorectal cancer patients with a resection of pulmonary metastases developing after LT. Thus, in selected colorectal cancer patients developing pulmonary metastases resection of these metastases should be the treatment of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +47-930-56-548; Fax: +47-23-07-05-10
| | - Tor Magnus Smedman
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Grut
- Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, 3004 Drammen, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Pål-Dag Line
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grut H, Line PD, Syversveen T, Dueland S. Metabolic tumor volume predicts long-term survival after transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: 15 years of experience from the SECA study. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:1073-1081. [PMID: 36241941 PMCID: PMC9668778 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01796-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective To report 15 years of experience with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of liver metastases from the preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods The preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT from all SECA 1 and 2 patients was evaluated. MTV was obtained from all liver metastases. The patients were divided into one group with low MTV (< 70 cm3) and one group with high MTV (> 70 cm3) based on a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and post recurrence survival (PRS) for patients with low versus high MTV were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log rank test. Clinopathological features between the two groups were compared by a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for continuous and Fishers exact test for categorical data. Results At total of 40 patients were included. Patients with low MTV had significantly longer OS (p < 0.001), DFS (p < 0.001) and PRS (p = 0.006) compared to patients with high values. The patients with high MTV had higher CEA levels, number of liver metastases, size of the largest liver metastasis, N-stage, number of chemotherapy lines and more frequently progression of disease at LT compared to the patients with low MTV. Conclusion MTV of liver metastases is highly predictive of long-term OS, DFS and PRS after LT for unresectable CRLM and should be implemented in risk stratification prior to LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Grut
- Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, 3004, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Askeland-Gjerde DE, Zimmermann M, Syversveen T, Ersryd A. Aneurisme i portvenen. Tidsskriftet 2022; 142:22-0088. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
8
|
Dueland S, Smedman TM, Røsok B, Grut H, Syversveen T, Jørgensen LH, Line PD. Treatment of relapse and survival outcomes after liver transplantation in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2205-2213. [PMID: 34792825 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) in selected colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with nonresectable liver-only metastases may result in 5-year overall survival of up to about 70-100%. However, the majority will have recurrent disease. All patients included in this report were included in prospective studies. Forty-four out of 56 patients had a relapse, and all 44 patients received treatment for recurrent disease. The organ of the first relapse was lung metastases in 23 of the 44 patients. The first treatment modality of the relapse was the treatment with curative intent in 55.8% of the patients, and chemotherapy was the first treatment administered to 25.6% of the patients. Patients receiving surgery of lung metastases had a 5-year overall survival of 66.5% from the time of metastasectomy. Patients receiving treatment with curative intent for metastases to other organs had a 5-year overall survival of 24.8%. Nine of the 44 patients had no evidence of disease (NED) at the end of the follow-up. Median time of NED in these patients was 54.3 months, and median overall survival from the time of LT was 8.4 years. Because of the high incidence of recurrent disease, these patients should have a systematic long-term follow-up since many of the relapses may be treated with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor M Smedman
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Grut
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars H Jørgensen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Görgec B, Hansen I, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bisschops RHC, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk V, De Boer MT, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, Gielkens H, Grünhagen DJ, Gillardin P, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kruimer JWH, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Morone M, Pennings JP, Peringa J, Te Riele WW, Vermaas M, Wicherts D, Willemssen FEJA, Zonderhuis BM, Bossuyt PMM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. Clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): study protocol for an international multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1116. [PMID: 34663243 PMCID: PMC8524830 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging method for patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the diagnostic workup for surgery or thermal ablation. Diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver is increasingly used to improve the detection rate and characterization of liver lesions. MRI is superior in detection and characterization of CRLM as compared to CT. However, it is unknown how MRI actually impacts patient management. The primary aim of the CAMINO study is to evaluate whether MRI has sufficient clinical added value to be routinely added to CT in the staging of CRLM. The secondary objective is to identify subgroups who benefit the most from additional MRI. METHODS In this international multicentre prospective incremental diagnostic accuracy study, 298 patients with primary or recurrent CRLM scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation based on CT staging will be enrolled from 17 centres across the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. All study participants will undergo CT and diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic-acid enhanced MRI prior to local therapy. The local multidisciplinary team will provide two local therapy plans: first, based on CT-staging and second, based on both CT and MRI. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of clinically significant CRLM (CS-CRLM) detected by MRI not visible on CT. CS-CRLM are defined as liver lesions leading to a change in local therapeutical management. If MRI detects new CRLM in segments which would have been resected in the original operative plan, these are not considered CS-CRLM. It is hypothesized that MRI will lead to the detection of CS-CRLM in ≥10% of patients which is considered the minimal clinically important difference. Furthermore, a prediction model will be developed using multivariable logistic regression modelling to evaluate the predictive value of patient, tumor and procedural variables on finding CS-CRLM on MRI. DISCUSSION The CAMINO study will clarify the clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients with CRLM scheduled for local therapy. This study will provide the evidence required for the implementation of additional MRI in the routine work-up of patients with primary and recurrent CRLM for local therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION The CAMINO study was registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register under number NL8039 on September 20th 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - E J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H C Bisschops
- Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V Cappendijk
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M T De Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Gillardin
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - H H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J W H Kruimer
- Department of Radiology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - D J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - B Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - M Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - J P Pennings
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - D Wicherts
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - F E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Å A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dueland S, Syversveen T, Hagness M, Grut H, Line PD. Liver transplantation for advanced liver-only colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1402-1405. [PMID: 34117498 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation provided a 5-year overall survival rate of 100 per cent in patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone liver resection previously. Patients with extensive liver metastases (over 20 lesions) and a left-sided primary tumour had long survival, whereas those with an ascending colonic primary tumour had inferior survival after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dueland
- Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Hagness
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Section for Transplantation Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Grut
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - P-D Line
- Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Section for Transplantation Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dueland S, Yaqub S, Syversveen T, Carling U, Hagness M, Brudvik KW, Line PD. Survival Outcomes After Portal Vein Embolization and Liver Resection Compared With Liver Transplant for Patients With Extensive Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:550-557. [PMID: 33787838 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been implemented in patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases to increase the number of patients able to undergo liver resection. Liver transplant could be an alternative in selected patients with extensive liver-only disease, and we have recently shown promising survival outcomes. Objective To compare overall survival (OS) among patients with colorectal cancer and high liver metastasis tumor load who were treated with liver transplant or with PVE and liver resection. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness research study assessed 50 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases who were previously enrolled in liver transplant studies between November 2006 and August 2019 at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Those patients were compared with a retrospective cohort of 53 patients in the Oslo University Hospital PVE database from March 2006 through November 2015 with similar selection criteria who underwent PVE and liver resection. Main Outcomes and Measures The OS among patients with high tumor load after liver transplant was compared with that among patients with high tumor load who underwent PVE and liver resection. High tumor load was defined as 9 or more metastatic tumors or a diameter of 5.5 cm or longer for the largest liver lesion. Results In the PVE cohort of 53 patients, the median age was 61.8 years (range, 34.3-71.3 years), and 36 patients (68%) were men. The 5-year OS rate among 38 patients who underwent liver resection after PVE was 44.6%. The 5-year OS rate for patients with high tumor load was 33.4% for those who underwent liver transplant and 6.7% for those who underwent PVE. Among patients with high tumor load and left-sided primary tumors, the 5-year OS rate was 45.3% for those receiving a liver allograft and 12.5% for those treated with PVE and liver resection. Conclusions and Relevance Patients with nonresectable disease, an extensive liver tumor load, and left-sided primary tumors had long OS after liver transplant, exceeding the survival outcome for those patients treated with PVE and liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ulrik Carling
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Hagness
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Pål-Dag Line
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smedman TM, Line PD, Hagness M, Syversveen T, Grut H, Dueland S. Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases in patients and donors with extended criteria (SECA-II arm D study). BJS Open 2020; 4:467-477. [PMID: 32333527 PMCID: PMC7260412 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5‐year survival rate of approximately 10 per cent. Liver transplantation using strict selection criteria in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver‐only disease will result in a 5‐year survival rate of 56–83 per cent. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after liver transplantation using extended criteria for both patients and donors. Methods This was a prospective single‐arm study. Patients with synchronous unresectable CRLM who were not suitable for arms A, B or C of the SEcondary CAncer (SECA) II study who had undergone radical resection of the primary tumour and received chemotherapy were included; they underwent liver transplantation with extended criteria donor grafts. Patients who had resectable pulmonary metastases were eligible for inclusion. The main exclusion criteria were BMI above 30 kg/m2 and liver metastases larger than 10 cm. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results Ten patients (median age 54 years; 3 women) were included. They had an extensive liver tumour load with a median of 20 (range 1–45) lesions; the median size of the largest lesion was 59 (range 15–94) mm. Eight patients had (y)pN2 disease, six had poorly differentiated or signet ring cell‐differentiated primary tumours, and five had primary tumour in the ascending colon. The median Fong clinical risk score was 3 (range 2–5) and the median Oslo score was 1 (range 1–4). The median plasma carcinoembryonic antigen level was 4·3 (range 2–4346) μg/l. Median disease‐free and overall survival was 4 and 18 months respectively. Conclusion Patients with unresectable liver‐only CRLM undergoing liver transplantation with extended patient and donor criteria have relatively short overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Smedman
- Department of Oncology, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - P-D Line
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Hagness
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - H Grut
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Dueland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo, Norway.,Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dueland S, Grut H, Syversveen T, Hagness M, Line PD. Selection criteria related to long-term survival following liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:530-537. [PMID: 31674105 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5-year overall survival rate of about 10%. Liver transplant provided a Kaplan-Meier-estimated 5-year overall survival of up to 83%. The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of different scoring systems to predict long-term overall survival after liver transplant. Patients with colorectal cancer with nonresectable liver-only metastases determined by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans from 2 prospective studies (SECA-I and -II) were included. All included patients had previously received chemotherapy. PET-CT was performed within 90 days of the liver transplant. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and survival after relapse based on the Fong Clinical Risk Score, total PET liver uptake (metabolic tumor volume), and Oslo Score were compared. At median follow-up of 85 months for live patients, Kaplan-Meier overall survival rates at 5 years were 100%, 78%, and 67% in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume-low group, and Oslo Score 0 to 2, respectively. Median overall survival was 101, 68, and 65 months in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume-low, and Oslo Score 0 to 2. These selection criteria may be used to obtain 5-year overall survival rates comparable to other indications for liver transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svein Dueland
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Harald Grut
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Hagness
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Transplantation Surgery, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Berstad AE, Brabrand K, Horneland R, Syversveen T, Haugaa H, Jenssen TG, Foss A. Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the vascular evaluation after pancreas transplantation: a single-center experience. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:1224-1231. [PMID: 30754980 DOI: 10.1177/0284185119828190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Audun E Berstad
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Brabrand
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Horneland
- Surgical Department, Section of Transplant Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Håkon Haugaa
- Dept. of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trond G Jenssen
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Metabolic and Renal Research Group, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aksel Foss
- Surgical Department, Section of Transplant Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dörje C, Reisaeter AV, Dahle DO, Mjøen G, Midtvedt K, Holdaas H, Flaa-Johnsen L, Syversveen T, Hartmann A, Jenssen T, Scott H, Reinholt FP. Total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies does not predict progression of fibrosis at one year post-transplant. Clin Transplant 2016; 30:802-9. [PMID: 27101801 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an uncertainty whether total inflammation in early protocol kidney graft biopsies is associated with fibrosis progression. We investigated whether total inflammation, both in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas, at week 6 would predict fibrosis progression at one yr post-transplant. METHODS We included 156 single adult ABO compatible kidney recipients with adequate week 6 and one yr transplant protocol biopsies (312 biopsies). Biopsies were scored according to the current Banff criteria. In addition, fibrosis and inflammation in fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas were scored in a 10-grade semi-quantitative eyeballing system from 0% to 100%. RESULTS Fibrosis increased significantly from week 6 to one yr both by the 10-grade scoring system from 0.69 ± 1.07 to 1.45 ± 1.86, (mean ± SD), p < 0.001 and by Banff interstitial fibrosis (ci) scoring 0.81 ± 0.65 to 1.13 ± 0.87, p < 0.001. The 10-grade scoring system detected a larger proportion of fibrosis progressors than the Banff scoring 40.4% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.001. No significant positive association was found between inflammation at week 6 and progression of fibrosis in either of the scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS Total inflammation in kidney transplant biopsies at week 6 did not predict progression of fibrosis at one yr post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Dörje
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Dag Olav Dahle
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Mjøen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karsten Midtvedt
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hallvard Holdaas
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Linda Flaa-Johnsen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anders Hartmann
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trond Jenssen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Metabolic and Renal Research Group, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Helge Scott
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Finn P Reinholt
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vesterhus M, Hov JR, Holm A, Schrumpf E, Nygård S, Godang K, Andersen IM, Naess S, Thorburn D, Saffioti F, Vatn M, Gilja OH, Lund-Johansen F, Syversveen T, Brabrand K, Parés A, Ponsioen CY, Pinzani M, Färkkilä M, Moum B, Ueland T, Røsjø H, Rosenberg W, Boberg KM, Karlsen TH. Enhanced liver fibrosis score predicts transplant-free survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2015; 62:188-97. [PMID: 25833813 DOI: 10.1002/hep.27825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2014] [Accepted: 03/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED There is a need to determine biomarkers reflecting disease activity and prognosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We evaluated the prognostic utility of the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score in Norwegian PSC patients. Serum samples were available from 305 well-characterized large-duct PSC patients, 96 ulcerative colitis patients, and 100 healthy controls. The PSC patients constituted a derivation panel (recruited 1992-2006 [n = 167]; median age 41 years, 74% male) and a validation panel (recruited 2008-2012 [n = 138]; median age 40 years, 78% male). We used commercial kits to analyze serum levels of hyaluronic acid, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1, and propeptide of type III procollagen and calculated ELF scores by the previously published algorithm. Results were also validated by analysis of ELF tests using the ADVIA Centaur XP system and its commercially available reagents. We found that PSC patients stratified by ELF score tertiles exhibited significantly different transplant-free survival in both panels (P < 0.001), with higher scores associated with shorter survival, which was confirmed in the validation panel stratified by ELF test tertiles (P = 0.003). The ELF test distinguished between mild and severe disease defined by clinical outcome (transplantation or death) with an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.87) and optimal cutoff of 10.6 (sensitivity 70.2%, specificity 79.1%). In multivariate Cox regression analysis in both panels, ELF score (hazard ratio = 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5, and 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, respectively) was associated with transplant-free survival independently of the Mayo risk score (hazard ratio = 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, and 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1, respectively). The ELF test correlated with ultrasound elastography in separate assessments. CONCLUSION The ELF score is a potent prognostic marker in PSC, independent of the Mayo risk score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Vesterhus
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johannes Roksund Hov
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anders Holm
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik Schrumpf
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ståle Nygård
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Institute for Medical Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Godang
- Section of Specialized Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ina Marie Andersen
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigrid Naess
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London & Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Saffioti
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London & Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Morten Vatn
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,The Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Molecular Biology (EpiGen), Campus Ahus, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Brabrand
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Albert Parés
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Pinzani
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London & Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martti Färkkilä
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bjørn Moum
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thor Ueland
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helge Røsjø
- K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - William Rosenberg
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London & Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirsten Muri Boberg
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom H Karlsen
- Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Syversveen T, Brabrand K, Midtvedt K, Strøm EH, Hartmann A, Berstad AE. Non-invasive assessment of renal allograft fibrosis by dynamic sonographic tissue perfusion measurement. Acta Radiol 2011; 52:920-6. [PMID: 21873503 DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.110215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy is a major cause of renal transplant failure. The diagnosis can currently only be verified by a graft biopsy. PURPOSE To evaluate whether non-invasive dynamic color Doppler sonographic parenchymal perfusion measurements are different in grafts with various degrees of biopsy proven renal transplant fibrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-nine adult patients were prospectively included. Four patients were excluded. Color Doppler videos from the renal cortex were recorded. Perfusion in the renal cortex was evaluated using a software package which calculates color pixel area and flow velocity, encoded by each pixel inside a region of interest of a video sequence. The software calculates parameters that describe tissue perfusion numerically. Two of these, the perfusion intensity and tissue pulsatility index, were compared to grade of interstitial fibrosis (0-3) in biopsies. Observer agreement was evaluated in a subset of 12 patients. RESULTS Of the 45 patients analyzed, 18 patients had grade 0, 18 had grade 1, seven had grade 2 and two had grade 3 fibrosis. The mean perfusion intensity of grade 0 was significantly higher than that of grade 2 and 3 fibrosis in the proximal cortical layer (1.65 m/s vs. 0.84 m/s, P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between grade 0 and grade 1 fibrosis. Perfusion intensity was correlated to estimated glomerular filtration rate (Pearson r 0.51, P = 0.001, R(2) = 0.26 and 0.46, P = 0.001, R(2) = 0.22 in the distal and proximal cortex, respectively). Inter-observer agreement of the perfusion intensity, expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.69 in the proximal part of the cortex. Intra-observer agreement was 0.85 for observer 1 and 0.82 for observer 2. CONCLUSION Perfusion intensity assessed by dynamic color Doppler measurements is significantly reduced in allografts with grade 2 and 3 fibrosis compared to allografts without fibrosis. Further studies involving longitudinal assessment of allografts undergoing protocol biopsies would be of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Knut Brabrand
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
| | - Karsten Midtvedt
- Section of Nephrology, Medical Department, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
| | - Erik H Strøm
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
| | - Anders Hartmann
- Section of Nephrology, Medical Department, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
- Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audun Elnaes Berstad
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
- Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Vemund Paulsen
- Avdeling for organtransplantasjon, fordøyelsesog og nyresykdommer, Oslo universitetssykehus, Rikshospitalet 0027 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Syversveen T, Brabrand K, Midtvedt K, Strøm EH, Hartmann A, Jakobsen JA, Berstad AE. Assessment of renal allograft fibrosis by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification - a pilot study. Transpl Int 2010; 24:100-5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01165.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
20
|
Krobert KA, Bach T, Syversveen T, Kvingedal AM, Levy FO. The cloned human 5-HT7 receptor splice variants: a comparative characterization of their pharmacology, function and distribution. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2001; 363:620-32. [PMID: 11414657 DOI: 10.1007/s002100000369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor pre-mRNA is alternatively spliced in human tissue to produce three splice variants, h5-HT7(a), h5-HT7(b) and h5-HT7(d), which differ only in their carboxyl terminal tails. Using membranes from transiently and stably transfected HEK293 cells expressing the three recombinant h5-HT7 splice variants we compared their pharmacological profiles and ability to activate adenylyl cyclase. Using PCR on cDNA derived from various human tissues, the 5-HT7(a) and 5-HT7(b) splice variants were detected in every tissue examined. The h5-HT7(d) splice variant was detected in 13 of 16 tissues examined, with predominant expression in the heart, small intestine, colon, ovary and testis. All three h5-HT7 splice variants displayed high affinity binding for [3H]5-HT (pKd=8.8-8.9) in the presence and absence of 100 microM GTP and had similar binding affinities for all 17 ligands evaluated. In HEK293 cells expressing similar, high levels of receptor (approximately 10,000 fmol/mg protein), 5-CT (5-carboxamidotryptamine), 5-MeOT (5-methoxytryptamine) and 5-HT were full agonists while 8-OH-DPAT ((2R)-(+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) was a partial agonist with relative efficacy of approximately 0.8. Even at this high receptor level, EC50 values for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase were 10- to 50-fold higher than the Kd values, indicating a lack of spare receptors. No significant differences in coupling to adenylyl cyclase were observed between the three splice variants over a wide range of receptor expression levels. For antagonists, binding affinities determined by displacement of [3H]5-HT binding and by competitive inhibition of 5-HT-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity were essentially identical amongst the splice variants. These studies indicate that the three human splice variants are pharmacologically indistinguishable and that modifications of the carboxyl tail do not influence coupling to adenylyl cyclase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Krobert
- MSD Cardiovascular Research Center, Rikshospitalet University Hospital and Department of Pharmacology, University of Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bach T, Syversveen T, Kvingedal AM, Krobert KA, Brattelid T, Kaumann AJ, Levy FO. 5HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) receptors have nearly identical pharmacology and are both expressed in human atrium and ventricle. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2001; 363:146-60. [PMID: 11218067 DOI: 10.1007/s002100000299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) increases human heart rate and atrial contractile force and hastens atrial relaxation through 5-HT4 receptors. Moreover, 5-HT may be arrhythmogenic and give rise to atrial fibrillation. It is not clear which splice variant(s) of the 5-HT4 receptor is expressed and mediates these effects of 5-HT in the human heart. Previous studies have indicated different pharmacological properties of 5-HT4 receptors in human heart and mouse colliculi neurones, possibly due to expression of different splice variants. We therefore cloned the human 5-HT4(b) receptor and compared its pharmacological properties with those of the cloned human 5-HT4(a) receptor and searched for the corresponding mRNA in human tissues. The primary structures of the two human 5-HT4 receptor splice variants are identical except for divergent C-terminal tails of 28 and 29 amino acids in the 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) receptors, respectively. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis showed that both variants were coexpressed in various tissues, including cardiac atrium and ventricle. Additional bands suggested the presence of more than two human 5-HT4 receptor splice variants. With cloned receptors stably expressed in HEK293 cells or transiently expressed in COS-7 cells, [3H]GR 113808 consistently showed slightly higher binding affinity to h5-HT4(b) than to h5-HT4(a) receptor (pKd 0.1-0.2 log units higher). Competition of agonists, partial agonists and antagonists for [3H]GR113808 binding revealed no significant differences between the two receptors. For 5-HT4 receptor agonists and antagonists, their potencies in stimulating or inhibiting, respectively, 5-HT-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity correlated well with their binding affinities. Tropisetron and SB207710 showed partial agonist activity at high receptor expression levels for both isoforms. Cisapride and renzapride were both partial agonists at moderate receptor levels and full agonists at high receptor levels. Cisapride was more potent than renzapride while the converse was the case in human atrium, for which cisapride had lower affinity and agonist potency than at the recombinant receptors. The binding affinities and agonist potencies of ligands for both 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) receptors correlated with the corresponding affinities and potencies in human atrium. The agonist potency of SB207710 was around 10 times lower than its binding and blocking affinity for both splice variants, suggesting that activation of adenylyl cyclase and blockade of 5-HT responses are mediated through different conformational states. The similar pharmacological properties of the two human 5-HT4 receptor splice variants together with their expression in human atrium would be consistent with mediation of the cardiostimulant effects of 5-HT through both variants. However, the effects of cisapride appear either mediated through non-a and non-b splice variants of the 5-HT4 receptor or 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) receptor expression in human atrial cells alters somewhat their pharmacological profile through still unknown mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Bach
- MSD Cardiovascular Research Centre and Institute for Surgical Research, University of Oslo, The National Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|