Defining the risk of liver failure after minor hepatectomy: a NSQIP analysis of 7029 patients

Interaction between the albumin-bilirubin score and nutritional risk index in the prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the most common postoperative complication and the leading cause of death after hepatectomy. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and nutritional risk index (NRI) have been shown to assess end-stage liver disease and predict PHLF and patient survival. We hypothesized that the ALBI score and NRI interact in the prediction of PHLF.

AIM

To analyze the interaction between the ALBI score and NRI in PHLF in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 186 patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma at the Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities between January 2020 and July 2023. Data on patient characteristics and laboratory indices were collected from their medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the interaction effect between the ALBI score and NRI in PHLF.

RESULTS

Of the 186 patients included in the study, PHLF occurred in 44 (23.66%). After adjusting for confounders, multivariate logistic regression identified ALBI grade 2/3 [odds ratio (OR) = 73.713, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.175-592.199] and NRI > 97.5 (OR = 58.990, 95%CI: 7.337-474.297) as risk factors for PHLF. No multiplicative interaction was observed between the ALBI score and NRI (OR = 0.357, 95%CI: 0.022-5.889). However, the risk of PHLF in patients with ALBI grade 2/3 and NRI < 97.5 was 101 times greater than that in patients with ALBI grade 1 and NRI ≥ 97.5 (95%CI: 56.445-523.839), indicating a significant additive interaction between the ALBI score and NRI in PHLF.

CONCLUSION

Both the ALBI score and NRI were risk factors for PHLF, and there was an additive interaction between the ALBI score and NRI in PHLF.

Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Cirrhotic patients with primary liver cancer may undergo curative-intent resection when selected appropriately. Patients with T1 tumors and low-MELD are generally referred for resection. We aim to evaluate whether minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) is associated with improved outcomes versus open hepatectomy (OH).

METHODS

NSQIP hepatectomy database 2014-2021 was used to select patients with T1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) or Intra-hepatic Cholangiocarcionoma (IHCC) and low-MELD cirrhosis (MELD ≤ 10) who underwent partial hepatectomy. Propensity score matching was applied between OH and MIH patients, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in the selected population.

RESULTS

There were 922 patients: 494 (53.6%) OH, 372 (40.3%) MIH, and 56 (6.1%) began MIH converted to OH (analyzed with the OH cohort). We matched 354 pairs of patients with an adequate balance between the groups. MIH was associated with lower rates of bile leak (HR 0.37 [0.19-0.72)], PHLF (HR 0.36 [0.15-0.86]), collections requiring drainage (HR 0.30 [0.15-0.63]), postoperative transfusion (HR 0.36 [0.21-0.61]), major (HR 0.45 [0.27-0.77]), and overall morbidity (HR 0.44 [0.31-0.63]), and a two-day shorter median hospitalization (3 vs. 5 days; HR 0.61 [0.45-0.82]). No difference was noted in operative time, wound, respiratory, and septic complications, or mortality. Regression analysis identified ascites, prior portal vein embolization (PVE), additional hepatectomies, Pringle's maneuver, and OH (vs. MIH) as independent predictors of PHLF.

CONCLUSION

MIH for early-stage HCC/IHCC in low-MELD cirrhotic patients was associated with improved postoperative outcomes over OH. These findings suggest that MIH should be considered an acceptable approach in this population of patients.

A novel nomogram based on preoperative parameters to predict posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure is one of the main causes of death in patients after hepatectomy. This study intends to establish a prediction model to predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure and provide a scientific basis for further reducing the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 1,172 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing partial hepatectomy. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and stepwise regression, a prediction model for posthepatectomy liver failure was established based on the independent risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure and validated by bootstrapping with 100 resamples, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of the prediction model.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of posthepatectomy liver failure was 22.7% (266/1172). The results showed that the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (odds ratio = 1.05, P = .002), alanine transaminase (odds ratio = 1.02, P < .001), albumin rate (odds ratio = 0.92, P < .001), total bilirubin (odds ratio = 1.04, P < .001), prothrombin time (odds ratio = 2.44, P < .001), aspartate aminotransferase-neutrophil ratio (odds ratio = 0.95, P < .001), and liver fibrosis index (odds ratio = 1.35, P < .001) were associated with posthepatectomy liver failure. These 7 independent risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure were integrated into a nomogram prediction model, the predictive efficiency for posthepatectomy liver failure (area under the curve = 0.818, 95% confidence interval 0.789-0.848) was significantly higher than in other predictive models with a liver fibrosis index (area under the curve = 0.651), indocyanine green R15 (area under the curve = 0.669), albumin-bilirubin score (area under the curve = 0.709), albumin-indocyanine green evaluation score (area under the curve = 0.706), model for end-stage liver disease score (area under the curve = 0.636), and Child‒Pugh (area under the curve = 0.551) (all P < .001). The risk of posthepatectomy liver failure in the high-risk posthepatectomy liver failure group (score ≥152) was higher than that in the posthepatectomy liver failure low-risk group (score <152).

CONCLUSION

This study developed and validated a nomogram model to predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure before surgery that can effectively predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment.

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.

RESULTS

Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.

Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Despite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022.

RESULTS

Uniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited.

DISCUSSION

Strict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries.

Early postoperative serum aspartate aminotransferase for prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure

Background

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication of hepatectomy. The current criteria for PHLF diagnosis (ISGLS consensus) require laboratory data on or after postoperative day (POD) 5, which may delay treatment for patients at risk. The present study aimed to determine the associations between early postoperative (POD1) serum aminotransferase levels and PHLF.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent hepatectomy at Ramathibodi Hospital from January 2008 to December 2019 were retrospectively examined. Patients were classified into PHLF and non-PHLF groups. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and early postoperative laboratory data (serum AST, ALT, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio (INR) on POD0 to POD5) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 890 patients were included, of whom 31 (3.4%) had PHLF. Cut-off points for AST of 260 U/L and ALT of 270 U/L on POD1 were predictive of PHLF. In multivariate analysis, AST > 260 U/L on POD1, ICG-R15, major hepatectomy, blood loss, and INR were independently associated with PHLF.

Conclusions

Early warning from elevated serum AST on POD1, before a definitive diagnosis of PHLF is made on POD5, can help alert physicians that a patient is at risk, meaning that active management and vigilant monitoring can be initiated as soon as possible.

Impact of post-hepatectomy liver failure on morbidity and short- and long-term survival after major hepatectomy

Background

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most serious postoperative complications after hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definition of PHLF on morbidity and short- and long-term survival after major hepatectomy.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent major hepatectomy (three or more liver segments) for various liver tumours between 2010 and 2018 at two Swedish tertiary centres for hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Descriptive statistics, regression models, and survival analyses were used.

Results

A total of 799 patients underwent major hepatectomy, of which 218 patients (27 per cent) developed ISGLS-defined PHLF, including 115 patients (14 per cent) with ISGLS grade A, 76 patients (10 per cent) with grade B, and 27 patients (3 per cent) with grade C. The presence of cirrhosis, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer, right-sided hemihepatectomy and trisectionectomy all significantly increased the risk of clinically relevant PHLF (grades B and C). Clinically relevant PHLF increased the risk of 90-day mortality and was associated with impaired long-term survival. ISGLS grade A had more major postoperative complications compared with no PHLF but failed to be an independent predictor of both 90-day mortality and long-term survival. The impact of PHLF grade B/C on long-term survival was no longer present in patients surviving the first 90 days after surgery.

Conclusions

The presently used ISGLS definition for PHLF should be reconsidered regarding mortality as only PHLF grade B/C was associated with a negative impact on short-term survival; however, even ISGLS grade A had clinical implications.

Nature of the liver volume depending on the gender and age assessing volumetry from a reconstruction of the computed tomography

Although the liver is a regenerating organ, excessive loss of liver volume (LV) can cause fatal liver failure. It is unclear whether LV is correlated with age; however, it is known that liver function decreases with age. In addition, the gender-related role of LV remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the changes in LV by age and gender. Between January and December 2018, 374 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for any abdominal examinations were enrolled. LV was evaluated using MDCT. The relationship between the LV and body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), age, and gender was investigated. The modified LV (mLV) was calculated by a formula measured LV × 1.5/BSA. LV correlated to BSA more than to BMI in both the males (R: 0.559 vs. 0.416) and females (R: 0.479 vs. 0.300) in our study. Age was negatively correlated to LV and BSA, and correlated to LV more than to BSA in males (R: 0.546 vs. 0.393) and females (R: 0.506 vs. 0.385). In addition, the absolute slope between age and LV in the males was higher than that in the females (14.1 vs. 10.2, respectively). Furthermore, the absolute slope of age and mLV in the males was slightly higher than in the females (9.1 vs. 7.3, respectively). In conclusion, LV in the normal liver is correlated to age rather than the one in the diseased liver. Liver volume in the males decreased more with age than LV in the females.

Liver Stiffness Measured by Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Predicting Symptomatic Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ability of liver stiffness (LS) measured by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D SWE) to predict symptomatic post-hepatectomy liver failure (SPHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 119 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between August 2018 and July 2019 were enrolled. Preoperative assessments for LS and other clinicopathological tests were performed in all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for the risk factors of SPHLF. Further subgroup analysis was performed according to multivariate analysis results.

RESULTS

SPHLF occurred in 38 patients (31.9%). The best cutoff value of LS for predicting SPHLF was 9.5 kPa. Multivariate analysis identified LS ≥ 9.5 kPa, greater Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) grade, and major hepatectomy as independent predictors of SPHLF. Based on the extent of hepatectomy, CTP grade could stratify the risk of SPHLF in the minor hepatectomy group (12.2% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.001), whereas LS was superior in predicting SPHLF in the major hepatectomy group (18.9% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.001). In patients with CTP grade A, LS could further stratify the risks of SPHLF in both the minor and major hepatectomy groups (3.7% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.043; 17.6% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LS measured using 2D SWE could predict SPHLF using the best cutoff value of 9.5 kPa. CTP grade was a stronger indicator of SPHLF in minor hepatectomy, whereas LS was more effective in selecting candidates for major hepatectomy. LS could further stratify the risk of SPHLF in CTP grade A patients, regardless of the extent of hepatectomy.