3
|
Machairas N, Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Underwood P, de Santibanes M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Urban I, Tsilimigras DI, Siriwardena AK, Frampton AE, Pawlik TM. Simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: current state-of-the-art. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:577-586. [PMID: 38583912 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) presents with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) at diagnosis. Surgical approaches for patients with sCRLM have evolved over the past decades. Simultaneous resection (SR) of CRC and sCRLM for selected patients has emerged as a safe and efficient alternative approach to traditional staged resections. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases with the end of search date October 30, 2023. The MeSH terms "simultaneous resections" and "combined resections" in combination with "colorectal liver metastases," "colorectal cancer," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. RESULTS SRs aim to achieve maximal tumor clearance, minimizing the risk of disease progression and optimizing the potential for long-term survival. Improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a better understanding of patient selection criteria have collectively contributed to reducing morbidity and mortality associated with these complex procedures. Several studies have demonstrated that SR are associated with reduced overall length of stay and lower costs with comparable morbidity and long-term outcomes. In light of these outcomes, the proportion of patients undergoing SR for CRC and sCRLM has increased substantially over the past 2 decades. CONCLUSION For patients with sCRLM, SR represents an attractive alternative to the traditional staged approach and should be selectively used; however, the decision on whether to proceed with a simultaneous versus staged approach should be individualized based on several patient- and disease-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Machairas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carita, Novara, Italy
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, HPB Centre, Salzkammergutklinikum Hospital, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Patrick Underwood
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Martin de Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Liver and Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Iveta Urban
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, HPB Centre, Salzkammergutklinikum Hospital, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Adam E Frampton
- HPB Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom; Section of Oncology, Surrey Cancer Research Institute, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The Leggett Building, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States; Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Görgec B, Hansen IS, Kemmerich G, Syversveen T, Abu Hilal M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Burgmans MC, Cappendijk VC, D'Hondt M, Edwin B, van Erkel AR, Gielkens HAJ, Grünhagen DJ, Gobardhan PD, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Klompenhouwer EG, Kok NFM, Kint PAM, Kuhlmann K, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, Lutin B, Maas M, Marsman HA, Meijerink M, Meyer Y, Morone M, Peringa J, Sijberden JP, van Delden OM, van den Bergh JE, Vanhooymissen IJS, Vermaas M, Willemssen FEJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PM, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Stoker J. MRI in addition to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): an international, multicentre, prospective, diagnostic accuracy trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:137-146. [PMID: 38081200 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines are inconclusive on whether contrast-enhanced MRI using gadoxetic acid and diffusion-weighted imaging should be added routinely to CT in the investigation of patients with colorectal liver metastases who are scheduled for curative liver resection or thermal ablation, or both. Although contrast-enhanced MRI is reportedly superior than contrast-enhanced CT in the detection and characterisation of colorectal liver metastases, its effect on clinical patient management is unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI on local treatment plan in patients with colorectal liver metastases amenable to local treatment, based on contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS We did an international, multicentre, prospective, incremental diagnostic accuracy trial in 14 liver surgery centres in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, and Italy. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histological proof of colorectal cancer, a WHO performance status score of 0-4, and primary or recurrent colorectal liver metastases, who were scheduled for local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. All patients had contrast-enhanced CT and liver contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid as a contrast agent before undergoing local therapy. The primary outcome was change in the local clinical treatment plan (decided by the individual clinics) on the basis of liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings, analysed in the intention-to-image population. The minimal clinically important difference in the proportion of patients who would have change in their local treatment plan due to an additional liver contrast-enhanced MRI was 10%. This study is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL8039. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 325 patients with colorectal liver metastases were assessed for eligibility. 298 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population, including 177 males (59%) and 121 females (41%) with planned local therapy based on contrast-enhanced CT. A change in the local treatment plan based on liver contrast-enhanced MRI findings was observed in 92 (31%; 95% CI 26-36) of 298 patients. Changes were made for 40 patients (13%) requiring more extensive local therapy, 11 patients (4%) requiring less extensive local therapy, and 34 patients (11%) in whom the indication for curative-intent local therapy was revoked, including 26 patients (9%) with too extensive disease and eight patients (3%) with benign lesions on liver contrast-enhanced MRI (confirmed by a median follow-up of 21·0 months [IQR 17·5-24·0]). INTERPRETATION Liver contrast-enhanced MRI should be considered in all patients scheduled for local treatment for colorectal liver metastases on the basis of contrast-enhanced CT imaging. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society and Bayer AG - Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S Hansen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunter Kemmerich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trygve Syversveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hugo A J Gielkens
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter A M Kint
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bart Lutin
- Department of Radiology, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jan Peringa
- Department of Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Inge J S Vanhooymissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|