Hakamata T, Otsuki S, Izumi D, Sakaguchi Y, Suzuki N, Ikami Y, Hasegawa Y, Yagihara N, Iijima K, Chinushi M, Koichi F, Inomata T. Clinical impact of ECG change on oversensing of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Heart Rhythm 2022;
19:1704-1711. [PMID:
35688344 DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.05.037]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Inappropriate shocks delivered from subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are most frequently caused by cardiac oversensing. However, the predictors for oversensing of S-ICD remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the predictors for oversensing of S-ICD, especially clinical impact of ECG change.
METHODS
We retrospectively enrolled 99 consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation between 2013 and 2021. Oversensing events were defined as inappropriate charge of the capacitors induced by cardiac or noncardiac signals other than tachycardia.
RESULTS
During a median 34 month (IQR 20-50 months) of the follow-up period, 11 of the 99 patients experienced 34 oversensing events and 4 patients received inappropriate shocks during their events. Six patients exhibited ECG changes (bundle branch block, 3; ventricular pacing, 1; inverted T wave, 1; poor R progression, 1) during follow-up period. Oversensing events were observed in four of the six patients with ECG changes (67%), and three patients underwent S-ICD removal because of inevitable shock. Contrastingly, among the remaining patients without ECG change, all 7 patients who experienced oversensing events could continue using S-ICD with reprogramming sensing vector and/or restriction of excessive exercise. Logistic regression analysis showed lower voltage of Sokolow-Lyon ECG (V1S+V5R) was the predictor of oversensing event among the patients without ECG change. When the cut off value was 2.1mV, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 85.7%, 62.7%, 15.7%, and 98.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Unavoidable oversensing resulting in S-ICD removal is caused by ECG changes. Oversensing in patients without ECG change can be managed.
Collapse