1
|
Del Monte A, Chierchia GB, Della Rocca DG, Pannone L, Sorgente A, Bala G, Monaco C, Mouram S, Capulzini Cremonini L, Audiat C, Praet J, Ramak R, Overeinder I, Ströker E, Sieira J, La Meir M, Brugada P, Sarkozy A, de Asmundis C, Almorad A. Posterior wall isolation via a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter: feasibility, technical considerations, endoscopic findings and comparison with cryoballoon technologies. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:273-283. [PMID: 37103590 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01549-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior wall (PW) isolation is an important adjunctive ablation target in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Traditionally performed with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation, PW isolation has also been performed with different cryoballoon technologies. We aimed at assessing the feasibility of PW isolation with the novel RF balloon catheter Heliostar™ (Biosense Webster, CA, USA). METHODS We prospectively enrolled 32 consecutive patients with persistent AF scheduled for first-time ablation with the Heliostar™ device. Procedural data were compared with those from 96 consecutive persistent AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) plus PW isolation with a cryoballoon device. The ratio RF balloon/cryoballoon was 1:3 for each operator involved in the study, aiming at avoiding any imbalance related to different experience. RESULTS Single-shot PV isolation was documented in a significantly higher number of cases with the RF balloon technology compared to cryoballoon ablation (89.8% vs. 81.0%; p = 0.02, respectively). PW isolation was achieved with a similar number of balloon applications between the two groups (11 ± 4 with the RF balloon versus 11 ± 2 with the cryoballoon; p = 0.16), but in a significantly shorter time among RF balloon patients (228 ± 72 s versus 1274 ± 277 s with cryoballoon; p < 0.001). Primary safety endpoint occurred in none of the RF balloon patients versus 5 (5.2%) patients in the cryoballoon group (p = 0.33). Primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in all (100%) RF balloon patients versus 93 (96.9%) cryoballoon ones (p = 0.57). Oesophageal endoscopy did not show any signs of thermal lesions in RF balloon patients with luminal temperature rise. CONCLUSIONS RF balloon-based PW isolation was safe and promoted shorter procedure times compared to similar cryoballoon-based ablation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvise Del Monte
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gian Battista Chierchia
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, 78705, USA.
| | - Luigi Pannone
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonio Sorgente
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gezim Bala
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cinzia Monaco
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sahar Mouram
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lucio Capulzini Cremonini
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Charles Audiat
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Robbert Ramak
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ingrid Overeinder
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Erwin Ströker
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Juan Sieira
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark La Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pedro Brugada
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Sarkozy
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Almorad
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zylla MM, Starrach L, Rahm AK, Thomas D, Frey N, Lugenbiel P. Implementation of the multielectrode radiofrequency-balloon in real-world clinical practice-operator learning curve and procedural outcome at a high-volume center. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1208250. [PMID: 38034374 PMCID: PMC10682364 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1208250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The novel multielectrode radiofrequency (RF) balloon catheter (HELIOSTAR™, Biosense Webster) is a new technology for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF), combining RF-ablation and 3D-mapping visualization with the concept of a "single-shot"-ablation device. This study evaluates the operator learning curve und procedural outcome during implementation of the multielectrode RF-balloon at a high-volume center. Methods The first 40 patients undergoing PVI by multielectrode RF-balloon catheter at Heidelberg University Hospital were included in this prospective study. Procedural outcome was analyzed over the course of increasing experience with the device. Results 157/157 pulmonary veins (PVs) were successfully isolated with the RF-balloon catheter, in 73.2% by a single RF-application. Median time to isolation (TTI) was 11.0 s (Q1 = 8.0 s; Q3 = 13.8 s). Median procedure time was 62.5 min (Q1 = 50.0 min; Q3 = 70.5 min). LA-dwell time was 28.5 min (Q1 = 23.3 min; Q3 = 36.5 min). Median fluoroscopy duration was 11.6 min (Q1 = 10.1 min; Q3 = 13.7 min). No serious procedure-related complications were observed, apart from one case of unclear, post-procedural acute-on-chronic kidney injury. With increasing operator experience, an additional reduction in procedure duration was observed. Conclusion Rapid implementation of a "single shot"-ablation device combining RF-ablation and 3D-mapping can be achieved with high acute procedural efficacy and safety at a high-volume center. Previous experience with "single-shot" ablation devices may be advantageous for time-efficient introduction of the novel RF-balloon catheter into clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier NCT0560361.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura M. Zylla
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lydia Starrach
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Rahm
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dierk Thomas
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Lugenbiel
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- HCR (Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders), Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aryana A, Su W, Kuniss M, Okishige K, de Asmundis C, Tondo C, Chierchia GB. Segmental nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins and extrapulmonary vein structures: Best practices III. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:1435-1444. [PMID: 33905811 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Although cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally has been guided by pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion, there is evidence and growing interest in performing segmental, nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation to target not only large/common PVs but extra-PV structures such as the left atrial (LA) roof and posterior wall in conjunction with PV isolation. A number of studies have demonstrated improved clinical efficacy associated with nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of the LA roof and posterior wall in addition to PV isolation, particularly in patients with persistent AF. Not only can the cryoballoon be used for targeting extra-PV structures through segmental, nonocclusive ablation, but the large size and durability of cryolesions coupled with the enhanced stability afforded through cryoadhesion render the cryoballoon an effective tool for such an approach. This article reviews the rationale and practical approach to segmental, nonocclusive cryoballoon ablation of large/common PV antra and the LA roof and posterior wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Aryana
- Mercy General Hospital and Dignity Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacramento, California.
| | - Wilber Su
- Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Malte Kuniss
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Kaoru Okishige
- Heart Center, Japan Red Cross Yokohama City Bay Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Heart Rhythm Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS; Department of Biochemical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|