Digital implantable loop recorders in the investigation of syncope in children: Benefits and limitations

Early detection of ventricular arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease using an insertable cardiac monitor (EDVA-CHD study)

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is an important mode of death in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). Risk stratification is difficult in this heterogeneous population. Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) may be useful for risk stratification. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of ICM for the detection of VA in adults with CHD.

METHODS

In this prospective single-center observational study we included consecutive adults with CHD deemed at risk of VA who received an ICM between March 2013 and February 2019. The decision to implant an ICM was made in a Heart Team consisting of a cardiac electrophysiologist and a cardiologist specialized in CHD.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (mean age, 38 ± 15 years; 50% male) received an ICM. During a median follow-up of 16 months, 8 patients (27%) had documented nonsustained VA. Of these 8 patients, 3 (10%) received a prophylactic ICD. Furthermore, ICM-detected arrhythmias were present in 22 patients (73%) leading to a change in clinical management in 16 patients (53%). Besides the patients receiving an ICD, 10 patients (33%) had a change in their antiarrhythmic drugs, 6 patients (20%) underwent an electrophysiology study, and 1 patient (3%) received a pacemaker.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of VA by the ICM contributed to the clinical decision to implant a prophylactic ICD. Furthermore, ICM-detected arrhythmias led to important changes in the clinical management. Therefore, long-term arrhythmia monitoring by an ICM seems valuable for risk stratification in adults with CHD.

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: The Cardiac Arrest Where Epinephrine Is Contraindicated

OBJECTIVES

To raise awareness among pediatric intensive care specialists of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; an uncommon cause of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation arrest in children and young adults where epinephrine (adrenaline), even when given according to international protocols, can be counter-productive and life-threatening. We review three cases of cardiac arrest in children, later proven to be catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia related, where delay in recognition of this condition resulted in significantly longer resuscitation efforts, more interventions, and a longer time to return of spontaneous circulation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary children's hospital.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

Three previously well children 4, 5, and 10 years old presented with cardiac arrest triggered by light activity, partial water immersion, and running, respectively. Initial resuscitation was bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and community defibrillation in all three cases. Electrocardiograms revealed multifocal ventricular ectopy, and in two (4 and 10 yr old), this correlated with repeated administration of epinephrine during repeated ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest resuscitation cycles. This ultimately resolved immediately (at 78 and 140 min, respectively) with IV opiates once catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was suspected. During recovery, on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, epinephrine challenge in two children induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, bidirectional ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation, which was cardioverted with flecainide in the 4-year-old. The third case was recognized early as catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and was managed by avoiding epinephrine and using opiates and general anesthesia after the initial (single) cardioversion, and had a much better clinical course, without recourse to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. All three carried de novo RyR2 (cardiac ryanodine) mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Those involved in resuscitation of young people should be aware of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and be suspicious of persistent ventricular ectopy, polymorphic, or bidirectional ventricular tachycardia during resuscitation. Appropriate management is avoidance of epinephrine, administration of general anesthesia, IV opiates, and consideration of flecainide.

PocketECG: A New Noninvasive Method for Continuous and Real-Time ECG Monitoring-Initial Results in Children and Adolescents

Long-term ECG is widely used in diagnosis and assessment of many cardiac symptoms which may be caused by dangerous arrhythmias that sometimes can be difficult to document. The PocketECG system is a new technological solution for a long-term, noninvasive, continuous and real-time ECG monitoring that provides automatic diagnosis of dysrhythmias. ECG data transmission occurs over a mobile network. The goal of this study was to assess the reliability of long-term ECG recordings acquired with the PocketECG system. One hundred and fifteen patients (43 girls and 72 boys) of an average age of 15.5 ± 2.5 years were examined at the Department of Cardiology at the Children's Memorial Health Institute. Two simultaneous 24-h ECG recordings were conducted: one with a Holter monitor and one with the PocketECG system. A linear correlation was demonstrated between the two methods with regard to the recorded QRS complexes [H = 1173.0 (-1946.40; 4838.50) + PocketECG*0.98 (0.94; 1.02)]. Mean diurnal heart rhythms were comparable (p > 0.05) despite the fact that the slowest and the fastest rates were different. The rate of detection for ventricular, supraventricular dysrhythmias and pauses in ventricular rhythm were comparable in both methods. The PocketECG system for continuous and real-time ECG recording is a reliable method for the assessment of heart rhythm and dysrhythmias in children and adolescents.

Holter Monitoring and Loop Recorders: From Research to Clinical Practice

Holter monitors are tools of proven efficacy in diagnosing and monitoring cardiac arrhythmias. Despite the fact their use is widely prescribed by general practitioners, little is known about their evolving role in the management of patients with cryptogenic stroke, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unexplained recurrent syncope and risk stratification in implantable cardioverter defibrillator or pacemaker candidates. New Holter monitoring technologies and loop recorders allow prolonged monitoring of heart rhythm for periods from a few days to several months, making it possible to detect infrequent arrhythmias in patients of all ages. This review discusses the advances in this area of arrhythmology and how Holter monitors have improved the clinical management of patients with suspected cardiac rhythm diseases.

Evaluation rhythm problems in unexplained syncope etiology with implantable loop recorder

BACKGROUND

Syncope is a frequent complaint in children and adolescents and may be a significant sign of serious pathology. Although patient history, family history, and physical examination are sufficient to reach a diagnosis in most cases of syncope, the cause of syncope still cannot be determined after initial investigation in one-third to half of all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorder (ILR) in children with unexplained syncope.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out of clinical data, indications, findings, and a final management strategy in patients who underwent ILR implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 9.4 ± 4.5 years underwent ILR (Reveal Plus; Medtronic) implantation. ILR implantation indication was syncope in all of the patients. Family history, routine cardiac assessment, including resting 12-lead electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, 24 h Holter recording, and event recorder findings, were normal with the exception of one patient with (previously corrected) tetralogy of Fallot. After an average of 20 months (range, 1-36 months), six patients developed symptoms. ILR memory showed torsades de pointes-ventricular fibrillation (n = 3), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), asystole and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), and normal sinus rhythm (n = 1). At the time of writing six patients were still in follow up with no symptoms after an average of 25.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Implantable loop recorder plays an important role in the diagnosis of life-threatening arrhythmias in which syncope is otherwise unexplained. ILR implantation should be remembered in children whose symptoms are strongly correlated with rhythm disturbances.

Clinical utility of implantable loop recorders

Implantable loop recorders provide the highest sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosing cardiac arrhythmia that results in cardiac syncope. When bradyarrhythmia or tachyarrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation, is detected, appropriate secondary prevention therapy will be implemented, which will impact the long-term clinical outcome. An implantable loop recorder enables the clinician to record for a longer period of time, which increases the likelihood of detecting cardiac arrhythmia. Currently, this technology is being evaluated to diagnose a cardiac etiology of ischemic stroke and to optimize atrial fibrillation management that will predict the success of rhythm control and prevent thromboembolic events. This article reviews implantable loop recorder technology, and discusses the current indications, the outcomes of clinical studies and ongoing current studies, and future technological improvements.

[Long-term follow-up after implantable loop recorder in patients with syncope: results of a French general hospital survey]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite recent advances in diagnostic procedures, syncope remains unexplained in 15 to 35% of patients. If implantable loop recorder is a validated diagnostic tool for unexplained syncope, results of this strategy are largely issued from randomized studies. We lack the results of surveys. The aim of this study was to report a single center experience with implantable loop recorders, in patients with unexplained syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A device (Medtronic Reveal DX or XT) was implanted in 31 patients between January 2009 and January 2012. During a mean follow-up of 10.5±8.5 months, loop recording definitively determined that an arrhythmia was the cause of symptoms in 10 patients (32%). Fourteen patients (45%) experienced syncope or pre-syncope. In eight of the 14 patients with syncope, during follow-up, no arrhythmic diagnosis could be made (one patient has been diagnosed as presenting epilepsy and seven as having hypotensive vasovagal syncope). In six patients, the ILR showed an arrhythmic aetiology. Four other patients presented an abnormal ILR result without symptoms. Diagnosis included sinusal arrest in four patients, bradycardia in one patient, advanced atrioventricular block in two patients, ventricular arrythmias in two patients, and supraventricular tachycardia of 180/min in one patient. Therapy was instituted in all patients, in whom an arrhythmic cause was found except one who refused the therapy (six pacemaker, two implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantations, and one cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia confirmed by an invasive exploration).

CONCLUSION

In this survey, implantable loop recorder implantation led to the diagnosis of an arrhythmic cause in 32% of patients and excluded an arrhythmic cause in 26% of patient with a mean follow-up of 10.5 months.

[Event-recorder]

Event or loop recorders monitor heart rhythm using discontinuous ECG storage which enables them to obtain a correlation between symptoms and the underlying heart rhythm in patients with infrequent, short-lasting episodes. External event recorders with intermittent monitoring, i.e., with electrodes within the device, are suitable for patients with palpitations or tachycardia who remain conscious. External event recorders with continuous monitoring are tolerated by patients for a few weeks and have a limited diagnostic impact in patients with recurrent syncope. The implantable loop recorder (ILR) monitors heart rhythm for one year and after patient-triggered or automatic activation stores a one-lead ECG up to 42 minutes prior to device activation. The diagnostic benefit of ILR in comparison to conventional approaches has been demonstrated in randomised studies. Furthermore, an ILR identifies patients with recurrent syncope of unknown origin in whom a pacemaker implantation can avoid further episodes. Additional possible indications are the monitoring of atrial fibrillation, the diagnostics of infrequent palpitations and patients with seizures.

Clinical diagnosis of syncopes (including so-called breath-holding spells) without electroencephalography or ocular compression

A recent article in this journal suggested that ocular compression during electroencephalography was useful in distinguishing "breath-holding spells and syncope" from epileptic seizures. The method proposed involved measurement of the RR interval on the simultaneously recorded electrocardiographic trace and determining both the absolute RR lengthening and the change in RR interval as compared with the baseline value. It is argued by the present author that this is not an appropriate way to come to a diagnosis in episodic loss of consciousness in children. It is pointed out that so-called "breath-holding spells" are reflex syncopes and that the diagnosis of reflex syncopes should be by clinical history, even if this means delaying the diagnosis until a future consultation. Published evidence on the nature and clinical diagnosis of reflex syncopes in infants and children is reviewed in depth. It is concluded that routine electroencephalography is not an appropriate investigation when the diagnosis of episodic loss of consciousness is in doubt and has the implicit danger of false positive "abnormality". Aside from scientific exploration of the developing autonomic nervous system, the only current indication for diagnostic ocular compression is to induce a syncope so that its nature may be better understood. Such a circumstance might be a history of an apparent reflex syncope but with atypical features, including prolonged post-syncopal unconsciousness such as might indicate epileptic absence status. Several additional investigations of a primarily cardiological nature may be indicated in some cases, but a wait-and-see policy is usually to be preferred.