Drawing the curtain on the isoelectric window?

Bidomain Predictions of Virtual Electrode-Induced Make and Break Excitations around Blood Vessels

Introduction and background

Virtual electrodes formed by field stimulation during defibrillation of cardiac tissue play an important role in eliciting activations. It has been suggested that the coronary vasculature is an important source of virtual electrodes, especially during low-energy defibrillation. This work aims to further the understanding of how virtual electrodes from the coronary vasculature influence defibrillation outcomes.

Methods

Using the bidomain model, we investigated how field stimulation elicited activations from virtual electrodes around idealized intramural blood vessels. Strength–interval curves, which quantify the stimulus strength required to elicit wavefront propagation from the vessels at different states of tissue refractoriness, were computed for each idealized geometry.

Results

Make excitations occurred at late diastolic intervals, originating from regions of depolarization around the vessel. Break excitations occurred at early diastolic intervals, whereby the vessels were able to excite surrounding refractory tissue due to the local restoration of excitability by virtual electrode-induced hyperpolarizations. Overall, strength–interval curves had similar morphologies and underlying excitation mechanisms compared with previous experimental and numerical unipolar stimulation studies of cardiac tissue. Including the presence of the vessel wall increased the field strength required for make excitations but decreased the field strength required for break excitations, and the field strength at which break excitations occurred was generally greater than 5 V/cm. Finally, in a more realistic ventricular slice geometry, the proximity of virtual electrodes around subepicardial vessels was seen to cause break excitations in the form of propagating unstable wavelets to the subepicardial layer.

Conclusion

Representing the blood vessel wall microstructure in computational bidomain models of defibrillation is recommended as it significantly alters the electrophysiological response of the vessel to field stimulation. Although vessels may facilitate excitation of relatively refractory tissue via break excitations, the field strength required for this is generally greater than those used in the literature on low-energy defibrillation. However, the high-intensity shocks used in standard defibrillation may elicit break excitation propagation from the coronary vasculature.

Purkinje activation precedes myocardial activation following defibrillation after long-duration ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND

While reentry within the ventricular myocardium (VM) is responsible for the maintenance of short-duration ventricular fibrillation (SDVF; VF duration <1 minute), Purkinje fibers (PFs) are important in the maintenance of long-duration ventricular fibrillation (LDVF; VF duration >1 minute).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the mechanisms of defibrillation may also be different for SDVF and LDVF.

METHODS

A multielectrode basket catheter was deployed in the left ventricle of eight beagles. External defibrillation shocks were delivered with a ramp-up protocol after SDVF (20 seconds) and LDVF (150 seconds). Earliest VM and PF activations were identified after the highest energy shock that failed to terminate VF and the successful shock.

RESULTS

Defibrillation was successful after 36 +/- 12 and 181 +/- 14 seconds for SDVF and LDVF, respectively. The time after shock delivery until earliest activation was detected for failed shocks and was significantly longer after LDVF (138.7 +/- 24.1 ms) than after SDVF (75.6 +/- 8.7 ms). Earliest postshock activation after SDVF typically initiated in the VM (14 of 16 episodes), while it always initiated in the PF (16 of 16 episodes) after LDVF. Sites of earliest activity during sinus rhythm correlated with sites of earliest postshock activation for PF-led cycles but not for VM-led cycles.

CONCLUSION

Earliest recorded postshock activation is in the Purkinje system after LDVF but not after SDVF. This difference raises the possibility that the optimal defibrillation strategy is different for SDVF and LDVF.

Role of Purkinje system in cardiac arrhythmias

The mechanisms responsible for postshock behavior of the heart are poorly understood. Below threshold shocks may induce arrhythmias that are difficult to contain. Cardiac vulnerability to shocks and defibrillation efficacy are largely determined by the postshock activity during the occurrence of a brief electrically quiescent period, known as the isoelectric window (IW) and activations following the IW period. This paper presents a detailed computer simulation study that underlines the role of the Purkinje system (PS) in postshock arrhythmogenesis. Reentry was induced in an anatomically realistic rabbit heart model using three different shocking protocols. Regions of vulnerability were determined for each protocol with and without PS. The role of PS during reentry was studied by isolating the PS from myocardium at various instances. The earliest post-shock activations were observed originating from the PS which initiated the reentry. The PS was shown to facilitate the reentry induction at weaker shocks. The PS also helped to stabilize the reentry in the early stages but did not play any significant role in the later stages. This research provides valuable insights into the postshock arrhythmogenesis and maintenance, and extends the discussion on the occurrence of IW as observed during clinical and experimental studies.