Troponin levels after ICD implantation with and without defibrillation testing and their predictive value for outcomes: Insights from the SIMPLE trial

The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy

Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended to prevent the risk of sudden cardiac death. However, shocks are associated with an increased mortality with a dose response effect, and a strategy of reducing electrical therapy burden improves the prognosis of implanted patients. We review the mechanisms of defibrillation and its consequences, including cell damage, metabolic remodeling, calcium metabolism anomalies, and inflammatory and pro-fibrotic remodeling. Electrical shocks do save lives, but also promote myocardial stunning, heart failure, and pro-arrhythmic effects as seen in electrical storms. Limiting unnecessary implantations and therapies and proposing new methods of defibrillation in the future are recommended.

Acute pathophysiological myocardial changes following intra-cardiac electrical shocks using a proteomic approach in a sheep model

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are meant to fight life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and reduce overall mortality. Ironically, life-saving shocks themselves have been shown to be independently associated with an increased mortality. We sought to identify myocardial changes at the protein level immediately after ICD electrical shocks using a proteomic approach. ICD were surgically implanted in 10 individuals of a healthy male sheep model: a control group (N = 5) without any shock delivery and a shock group (N = 5) with the delivery of 5 consecutive shocks at 41 J. Myocardial tissue samples were collected at the right-ventricle apex near to the lead coil and at the right ventricle basal free wall region. Global quantitative proteomics experiments on myocardial tissue samples were performed using mass spectrometry techniques. Proteome was significantly modified after electrical shock and several mechanisms were associated: protein, DNA and membrane damages due to extreme physical conditions induced by ICD-shock but also due to regulated cell death; metabolic remodeling; oxidative stress; calcium dysregulation; inflammation and fibrosis. These proteome modifications were seen in myocardium both "near" and "far" from electrical shock region. N-term acetylated troponin C was an interesting tissular biomarker, significantly decreased after electrical shock in the "far" region (AUC: 0.93). Our data support an acute shock-induced myocardial tissue injury which might be involved in acute paradoxical deleterious effects such as heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias.

Defibrillation testing during implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a necessary standard or becoming redundant?

Since the publication of the SIMPLE and NORDIC trials, defibrillation testing (DFT) is rarely performed during routine implantation of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). However, the results of these trials cannot be extrapolated to the later introduced subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and a class I recommendation to perform DFT during the implantation of these devices remains in the current guidelines. Due to the high conversion success rate of DFT on one hand, and the risk of complications on the other, a significant number of physicians omit DFT in S‑ICD recipients. Several retrospective analyses have assessed the safety of the omission of DFT and report contradicting results and recommendations. It is known that implant position, as well as device factors and patient characteristics, influence defibrillation success. A better comprehension of these factors and their relationship could lead to more reliable and safer alternatives to DFT. An ongoing randomised clinical trial, which is expected to end in 2023, is the first study to implement a method that assesses implant position to identify patients who are likely to fail their DFT.

Impact of defibrillation threshold testing on burden of heart failure hospitalizations

Background: Defibrillation threshold testing (DT) following implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has not shown to improve mortality. However, the impact of DT on burden of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations has not been well defined.Methods: We studied retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation or generator change between 2008 and 2014. Primary outcome was burden of HF hospitalisations within 30 days following implantation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, stroke, and ICD shock within 30 days and one-year mortality.Results: Three hundred and eleven of 501 patients (62%) were in DT+ group versus 190 (38%) were in DT- group. The percentage of new implantations was higher in DT+ group than in DT- group (69% vs 39%, p < .001) but the distributions of NYHA function classes were similar between two groups. The burden of HF hospitalisations at 30-days was significantly higher in DT+ group than in DT- group (17.4% vs 4.7%, HR 0.842, 95% CI 0.774-0.915, p < .0001). No difference in mortality, stroke or ICD shocks was found between two groups at 30 days and mortality at 1 year.Conclusions: DT after new ICD or generator replacement was associated with increased HF hospitalisation rates at 30 days after ICD implant in a non-trial HF population. However, there was no association between DT and mortality, stroke and ICD shocks at 30 days or mortality at 1 year. The increased burden of HF hospitalisation in this observational study requires validation by randomised studies.

Myocardial Minimal Damage After Rapid Ventricular Pacing - the prospective randomized multicentre MyDate-Trial

Therapy of choice for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death is the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Whereas appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks lead to myocardial microdamage, this is not known for antitachycardia pacing (ATP). In total, 150 ICD recipients (66 ± 12 years, 81.3% male, 93.3% primary prevention, 30.0% resynchronization therapy) were randomly assigned to an ICD implantation with or without intraoperative ATP. In the group with ATP, the pacing maneuver was performed twice, each time applying 8 impulses à 6 Volt x 1.0 milliseconds to the myocardium. High sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) levels were determined prior to the implantation and thereafter. There was no significant difference in the release of hsTnT between the two randomization groups (delta TnT without ATP in median 0.010 ng/ml [min. −0.016 ng/ml–max. 0.075 ng/ml] vs. with ATP in median 0.013 ng/ml [min. −0.005–0.287 ng/ml], p = 0.323). Setting a hsTnT cutoff of 0.059 ng/dl as a regularly augmented postoperative hsTnT level, no relevant difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative hsTnT levels above this cutoff could be identified (without ATP n = 10 [14.7%] vs. with ATP n = 16 [21.9%], p = 0.287). There was no significant difference in the release of high sensitive Troponin between patients without intraoperative ATP compared to those with intraoperative ATP. Hence, antitachycardia pacing does not seem to cause significant myocardial microdamage. This may further support its use as a painless and efficient method to terminate ventricular tachycardia in high-risk patients.

Internal Versus External Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial arrhythmias are common in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). External shocks and internal cardioversion through commanded ICD shock for electrical cardioversion are used for rhythm-control. However, there is a paucity of data on efficacy of external versus internal cardioversion and on the risk of lead and device malfunction. We hypothesized that external cardioversion is noninferior to internal cardioversion for safety, and superior for successful restoration of sinus rhythm.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ICD undergoing elective cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias at 13 centers were randomized in 1:1 fashion to either internal or external cardioversion. The primary safety end point was a composite of surrogate events of lead or device malfunction. Conversion of atrial arrhythmia to sinus rhythm was the primary efficacy end point. Myocardial damage was studied by measuring troponin release in both groups.

RESULTS

N=230 patients were randomized. Shock efficacy was 93% in the external cardioversion group and 65% in the internal cardioversion group (P<0.001). Clinically relevant adverse events caused by external or internal cardioversion were not observed. Three cases of pre-existing silent lead malfunction were unmasked by internal shock, resulting in lead failure. Troponin release did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized trial on external vs internal cardioversion in patients with ICDs. External cardioversion was superior for the restoration of sinus rhythm. The unmasking of silent lead malfunction in the internal cardioversion group suggests that an internal shock attempt may be reasonable in selected ICD patients presenting for electrical cardioversion.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03247738.

Cardiac impact of R-wave triggered irreversible electroporation therapy

BACKGROUND

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumor ablative therapy technique, using electric fields to induce apoptosis in target tissues. Whether these electric pulses of high field strength can cause cardiac damage and/or ablation-induced arrhythmias is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the safety of electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated IRE with regard to cardiac side effects.

METHODS

In all patients, 12-lead ECG and signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) recordings were performed before and after IRE and 24-hour Holter recording on the day of the IRE procedure. Venous blood samples (N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], high-sensitive troponin I [hsTnI]) were obtained before and 4 and 16 hours after the procedure. Patients with abnormal findings were reevaluated after 3 months.

RESULTS

In total, 26 patients with an oncologic indication for IRE (11 females, mean age 62.9 years) were prospectively enrolled. Nine patients (34.6%) showed an increase in hsTnI and 21 patients (80.8%) an increase in NT-proBNP after ablation. Fifteen patients (57%) developed arrhythmias related to the procedure. One patient, in whom hsTnI and NT-proBNP had increased, developed multiple, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia events. In another patient, atrial fibrillation was triggered twice in 2 separate procedures. Twelve patients had clinically benign arrhythmias. SAECG was negative in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical myocardial injury and nonfatal cardiac arrhythmias can occur in the context of IRE treatment. Although no sustained cardiac injuries could be found at 3-month follow-up, we propose implementation of a cardiac safety algorithm consisting of cardiac biomarkers and ECG monitoring when IRE is conducted.

Pacemaker Implantation Associated Myocardial Micro-Damage: A Randomised Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads

Fixation of the pacemaker leads during pacemaker implantation leads to an increase of cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) that can be interpreted as a sign of minimal myocardial damage. This trial evaluates whether the mechanism type of lead fixation influences the magnitude of cTnT release. Patients having a de-novo cardiac pacemaker implantation or a lead revision were centrally randomized to receive either a ventricular lead with an active (screw) or passive (tine) fixation mechanism. High-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) was determined on the day of the procedure beforehand and on the following day. 326 Patients (median age (IQR) 75.0 (69.0–80.0) years, 64% male) from six international centers were randomized to receive ventricular leads with an active (n = 166) or passive (n = 160) fixation mechanism. Median (IQR) hsTnT levels increased by 0.009 (0.004–0.021) ng/ml in the group receiving screw-in ventricular leads and by 0.008 (0.003–0.030) ng/ml in the group receiving tined ventricular leads (n.s.). In conclusion pacemaker implantations are followed by a release of hsTnT. The choice between active or passive fixation ventricular leads does not have a significant influence on the extent of myocardial injury and the magnitude of hsTnT release.

Electrical cardioversion of patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator: results of a survey of german centers and systematic review of the literature

AIMS

A relevant number of patients presenting for electrical cardioversion carry a pacemaker (PM) or ICD. Case reports suggest a potential hazard of external cardioversion/defibrillation. The incidence of shock related device complications is unknown. No guidelines or recommendations by international medical societies for a cardioversion protocol of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) patients exist. We conducted a nationwide survey to gather real-world clinical data on the current clinical approach towards these patients during electrical cardioversion and to estimate the incidence of shock-related complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety hospitals with > 380 ECV in 2014 were identified from mandatory hospital quality reports and 60 were randomly selected. All centers were provided with a standardized questionnaire on the general proceedings and complications during electrical cardioversion of pacemaker, ICD and CRT patients (CIED patients). Thirty-two centers (53%) participated in the survey. In total, 16,554 ECV were reported (534 ± 314 per center). Biphasic cardioversion with a first shock energy of ≥ 150 J via adhesive patches in antero-posterior orientation was preferred by most centers (78%). Eleven percent (n = 1809) of pts were reported to carry a PM/ICD. The ECV protocol was heterogeneous among centers. Complications associated with electrical cardioversion were reported in 11/1809 patients (0.6%), all were transitory elevations of pacing thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide snapshot survey of cardioversion procedures in Germany, approximately 11% of patients presenting for elective electrical cardioversion were pacemaker or ICD carriers. Cardioversion protocols in these patients are heterogeneous throughout centers and mostly not in accordance with recommendation of the German Cardiac Society. Complications associated with external electrical cardioversion are rare. Controlled trials and large registries are necessary to provide evidence for future recommendations.

The association between defibrillation shock energy and acute cardiac damage in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to establish a minimally invasive defibrillation testing (DT) protocol for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS

Two different energy DTs were performed, immediately after (15 J-DT) and 7 days after (≤10 J-DT) device implantation, in 20 consecutive ICD implantation patients. Cardiac-troponin T (c-TNT) and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) levels were measured before implantation, 2 h after implantation, and 1 day after each DT. For an additional 122 patients with ICD, we retrospectively analyzed 203 DTs immediately and 7 days after device implantation.

RESULTS

Serum c-TNT levels were significantly elevated 2 h after 15 J-DT [0.008 (0.004-0.019) vs. 0.053 (0.037-0.068) ng/mL, p<0.001], but not ≤10 J-DT [0.007 (0.004-0.018) ng/mL]. Similarly, serum H-FABP levels were significantly elevated 2 h after 15 J-DT (2.9±1.5 vs. 6.4±3.4 ng/mL, p<0.001), but not ≤10 J-DT (2.7±1.5 ng/mL). The changes in c-TNT and H-FABP levels between baseline and 2 h after DT were significantly greater for 15 J-DT compared with ≤10 J-DT [c-TnT: 0.039 (0.029-0.060) vs. 0 (0-0.003) ng/mL, p<0.001; H-FABP: 3.6±2.8 vs. -0.16±1.1 ng/mL, p<0.001]. The success rates of the initial shocks delivered for ventricular fibrillation were no different between ≤10 J-DT (85% [78/92]) and ≥15 J-DT (92% [103/111]).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of myocardial damage markers such as c-TNT and H-FABP were not found after ≤10 J-DT. In addition, an acceptable success rate was confirmed in ≤10 J-DT.