Left ventricular regional remodeling and lead position during cardiac resynchronization therapy

Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Using a Lead Placement Score Derived From 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for patients with heart failure; however, 30% of patients do not respond to the treatment. We sought to derive patient-specific left ventricle maps of lead placement scores (LPS) that highlight target pacing lead sites for achieving a higher probability of CRT response.

METHODS

Eighty-two subjects recruited for the ImagingCRT trial (Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) were retrospectively analyzed. All 82 subjects had 2 contrast-enhanced full cardiac cycle 4-dimensional computed tomography scans: a baseline and a 6-month follow-up scan. CRT response was defined as a reduction in computed tomography-derived end-systolic volume ≥15%. Eight left ventricle features derived from the baseline scans were used to train a support vector machine via a bagging approach. An LPS map over the left ventricle was created for each subject as a linear combination of the support vector machine feature weights and the subject's own feature vector. Performance for distinguishing responders was performed on the original 82 subjects.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (63%) subjects were responders. Subjects with an LPS≤Q1 (lower-quartile) had a posttest probability of responding of 14% (3/21), while subjects with an LPS≥ Q3 (upper-quartile) had a posttest probability of responding of 90% (19/21). Subjects with Q1

CONCLUSIONS

An LPS map was defined using 4-dimensional computed tomography-derived features of left ventricular mechanics. The LPS correlated with CRT response, reclassifying 25% of the subjects into low probability of response, 25% into high probability of response, and 50% unchanged. These encouraging results highlight the potential utility of 4-dimensional computed tomography in guiding patient selection for CRT. The present findings need verification in larger independent data sets and prospective trials.

Collapse

Key Words

• cardiac imaging techniques
• cardiac resynchronization therapy
• four-dimensional computed tomography
• heart failure
• heart function tests
• support vector machine
• ventricular function

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
• Clinical Trials as Topic
• Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging
• Heart Failure/therapy
• Humans
• Lipopolysaccharides
• Prospective Studies
• Retrospective Studies
• Tomography
• Treatment Outcome
• Ventricular Function, Left

Collapse

Grants

• F31 HL151183 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL144678 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL160024 NHLBI NIH HHS
• T32 HL105373 NHLBI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ashish Manohar Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Gabrielle M. Colvert Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
James Yang Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Zhennong Chen Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Maria J. Ledesma-Carbayo Biomedical Image Technologies Laboratory, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain
Mads Brix Kronborg Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
Anders Sommer Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Bjarne L. Nørgaard Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
Jens Cosedis Nielsen Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Elliot R. McVeigh Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Collapse

Characterization of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by post-procedural computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Causes of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) include mechanical dyssynchrony, myocardial scar, and suboptimal left ventricular (LV) lead location. We aimed to assess the utility of Late Iodine Enhancement Computed Tomography (LIE-CT) with image subtraction in characterizing CRT non-response.

METHODS

CRT response was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume > 15% at 6 months. LIE-CT was performed after 6 months, and analyzed global and segmental dyssynchrony, myocardial scar, coronary venous anatomy, and position of LV lead relative to scar and segment of latest mechanical contraction.

RESULTS

We evaluated 29 patients (age 71 ± 12 years; 72% men) including 18 (62%) responders. All metrics evaluating residual dyssynchrony such as wall motion index and wall thickness index were worse in non-responders. There was no difference in presence and extent of scar between responders and non-responders. However, in non-responders, the LV lead was more often over an akinetic/dyskinetic area (72% vs. 22%, p = .007), a fibrotic area (64% vs. 8%, p = .0007), an area with myocardial thickness < 6 mm (82% vs. 22%, p = .002), and less often concordant with the region of maximal wall thickness (9% vs. 72%, p = .001). Among the 11 non-responders, eight had at least another coronary venous branch visualized by CT, including three (27%) coursing over a potentially interesting myocardial area (free of scar, with normal wall motion, and with a myocardial thickness ≥6 mm).

CONCLUSION

LIE-CT with image subtraction allows a comprehensive characterization of patients after CRT and may provide clues for management of non-responders.