Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes between Leadless and Conventional Transvenous Pacemakers Implantation: An Up-to-Date Meta-analysis

Background

Leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCPs) are emerging as viable alternatives to conventional transvenous pacemakers (TVPs). This study aimed to systematically compare the postoperative outcomes of LCPs and TVPs based on available published studies.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature comparing outcomes from LCP and TVP implantations. Data analysis was performed using Stata/MP 17.0. The evaluated endpoints included pericardial effusion or perforation, puncture site events, infective endocarditis, lead or device dislodgement, pocket-related complications, tricuspid regurgitation or dysfunction, any infection, increased right ventricle (RV) pacing threshold, embolism, and thrombosis. Aggregated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for heterogeneity if I2 was >50% or p < 0.01, otherwise, the random-effects model was chosen. Publication bias was analyzed if the number studies exceeded ten.

Results

The meta-analysis included 24 observational studies with 78,938 patients, comprising 24,191 with LCP implantation and 54,747 with TVP implantation. The results indicated a significantly lower incidence of lead or device dislodgment (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.91-5.77, p < 0.01), infective endocarditis (OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 3.10-4.24, p < 0.01), and infection (OR = 3.93, 95% CI: 1.67-9.24, p < 0.01) in the LCP group compared to the TVP group. In contrast, incidences of puncture site complications (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.19-0.32, p < 0.01) and pericardial effusion or perforation (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.28-0.39, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the LCP group.

Conclusions

Compared with TVP, LCP implantation is associated with a lower risk of infective endocarditis, lead or device dislodgment, infections, and pocket-related complications. However, LCP implantation carries a higher risk of puncture site complications and pericardial effusion or perforation. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of patient-specific factors when choosing between LCP and TVP implantation.

The PROSPERO Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (CRD42023453145).

Leadless pacemaker implantation using halo-shape technique in a severe dextroscoliosis octogenarian

The halo-shape technique (HST) is an emerging approach for implanting a leadless pacemaker in scoliosis patients in recent years. Severe scoliosis and humpback made it challenging to push the tip of the delivery catheter towards the ventricular septum using the conventional gooseneck-shape technique. The feasibility and safety of the use of HST in an octogenarian with severe dextroscoliosis and humpback have not been well-assessed. Here, we report a case of high-degree atrioventricular block octogenarian with severe dextroscoliosis and humpback who successfully received a leadless pacemaker implantation using HST. Procedure-related complications were not observed, and the electrical parameters were stable at 6-month follow-up.

Recurrent Pericardial Effusion Resulting From Right Ventricular Free Wall Injury Caused by Leadless Pacemaker Tines

An 87-year-old man developed delayed cardiac tamponade 55 min after leadless pacemaker implantation and recurrent pericardial effusion 20 days later. Electrocardiogram-gated enhanced cardiac computed tomography revealed that the leadless pacemaker tines on the lateral side had penetrated the right ventricular free wall. He underwent off-pump hemostatic surgery.

Aveir VR real-world performance and chronic pacing threshold prediction using mapping and fixation electrical data

AIMS

Aveir VR performance and predictors for its pacing threshold (PCT) in a real-world cohort were investigated.

METHODS

Electrical measurements at various stages of an Aveir VR implant were prospectively collected. Predictors for 3-month PCT were studied. A retrospective cohort of consecutive 139 Micra implants was used to compare the PCT evolution. High PCT was defined as ≥1.5 V, using a pulse width of 0.4 ms for Aveir and 0.24 ms for Micra. Excellent PCT was defined as ≤0.5 V at the respective pulse width.

RESULTS

Among the 123 consecutive Aveir VR implant attempts, 122 (99.2%) were successful. The majority were of advanced age (mean 79.7) and small body size (mean BSA 1.60). Two patients (1.6%) experienced complications, including one pericardial effusion after device reposition and one intraoperative device dislodgement. Eighty-eight patients reached a 3-month follow-up. Aveir 3-month PCT was correlated with impedance at mapping (P = 0.015), tether mode (P < 0.001), end-of-procedure (P < 0.001), and mapping PCT (P = 0.035), but not with PCTs after fixation (P > 0.05). Tether mode impedance >470 ohms had 88% sensitivity and 71% specificity in predicting excellent 3-month PCT. Although it is more common for Aveir to have high PCT at end of procedure (11.5% for Aveir and 2.2% for Micra, P = 0.004), the rate at 3 months was similar (2.3% for Aveir and 3.1% for Micra, P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Aveir VR demonstrated satisfactory performance in this high-risk cohort. Pacing thresholds tend to improve to a greater extent than Micra after implantation. The PCT after fixation, even after a waiting period, has limited predictive value for the chronic threshold. Low-mapping PCT and high intraoperative impedance predict chronic low PCT.

A case of endocardial dissection caused by Micra implantation

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemakers are a recent technological advancement. It has many advantages, but there are still a few serious complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

This article reports the case of a patient with an endocardial tear and dissection caused by contact with the tip of the Micra cup during surgery and summarises the relevant data.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report details the occurrence and management of the incident and provides some guidance for future clinical management.

Acute pacing threshold elevation during simultaneous Micra leadless pacemaker implantation and AV node ablation: Clinical cases, computer model and practical recommendations

BACKGROUND

In patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation is recommended. The Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (Micra) is a single chamber leadless pacemaker (LPM) and thus offers the possibility of AV node (AVN) ablation in the same procedure. Pacing threshold (PT) elevation after radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a potential complication.

METHODS

We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study. Patients implanted with a Micra (n = 84) and concomitant or delayed AVN ablation (n = 12) from 2014 to 2022 were included. Two cases of acute Micra PT elevation immediately following RF AVN ablation required device retrieval and implantation of a new Micra. Procedural characteristics and electrophysiological parameters were analyzed, and a computer model was performed to determine factors responsible for acute PT elevations.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included. Mean age was 74 ± 10 and 48% were women. Twelve patients (14%) underwent AVN ablation. Two patients had acute PT elevation requiring device retrieval despite no direct contact of the ablation catheter with the Micra. Computer modeling shows that significant dissipated power due to electrical field coupling can occur at the tip or ring electrode if the catheter is not kept at a safe distance (≥35 mm) from the Micra when a maximum power of 100 W is delivered.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent AVN ablation and Micra implantation is safe in most patients. To prevent acute PT elevation, keeping a safe distance of ≥35 mm from the tip and ring electrodes of the Micra and using lower power output may prevent this complication.

Right ventriculography improves the accuracy of leadless pacemaker implantation in right ventricular mid-septum

Background

Implanting leadless pacemakers in the right ventricular (RV) apex is prone to causing pericardial tamponade and myocardial perforation.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of right ventriculography-guided implantation of Micra™ leadless pacemaker (Micra™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the RV mid-septum.

Methods

One hundred eight consecutive patients who underwent Micra™ implantation intended in the mid-septum were enrolled and randomized (3:1) into the radiography group (n = 81) with assistance of right ventriculography to illustrate the RV septum and the non-radiography group (n = 27). All subjects underwent a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to determine the Micra™ location. The Micra™ location assessed by CT image was compared between the two groups to confirm the accuracy of the intended pacing site. The duration of the procedure, X-ray radiation dose, and time were also compared between the two groups.

Results

Reconstructed CT 3-D cardiac images found the Micra™ location in the intended mid-septum in 13 patients (48.1%, 13/27) in the non-radiography group and 76 patients (93.8%, 76/81) in the radiography group (P < 0.0001 between two groups). There was no significant difference in procedure interval between the two groups while the X-ray radiation dose (564.86 ± 112.44 vs. 825.85 ± 156.12 mGy, P < 0.0001), X-ray exposure time (7.79 ± 1.43 vs. 12.03 ± 2.86 min, P < 0.0001), and the number of fluoroscopy re-positioning (2.79 ± 1.03 vs. 6.41 ± 1.82, P < 0.0001) were significantly less in the radiography group than in the non-radiography group. No implantation-related complications were observed in both groups.

Conclusion

Right ventriculography increases the accuracy of Micra™ implantation in the mid-septum and reduces X-ray exposure.

Trial registration

The trial registration number (ChiCTR2100051374) and date (09/22/2021).

Exploratory use of intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography to guide implantation of the leadless pacemaker

Background

Fluoroscopy is the standard tool for transvenous implantation of traditional and leadless pacemakers (LPs). LPs are used to avoid complications of conventional pacemakers, but there still is a 6.5% risk of major complications. Mid-right ventricular (RV) septal device implantation is suggested to decrease the risk, but helpful cardiac landmarks cannot be visualized under fluoroscopy. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an alternative intraprocedural imaging method.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the spatial relationship of the LP to cardiac landmarks via TEE and their correlations with electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters, and to outline an intraprocedural method to confirm mid-RV nonapical lead positioning.

Methods

Fifty-six patients undergoing implantation of LP with TEE guidance were enrolled in the study. Device position was evaluated by fluoroscopy, ECG, and TEE. Distances between the device and cardiac landmarks were measured by TEE and analyzed with ECG parameters with and without RV pacing.

Results

Mid-RV septal positioning was achieved in all patients. TEE transgastric view (0°-40°/90°-130°) was the optimal view for visualizing device position. Mean tricuspid valve-LP distance was 4.9 ± 0.9 cm, mean pulmonary valve-LP distance was 4.2 ± 1 cm, and calculated RV apex-LP distance was 2.9 ± 1 cm. Mean LP paced QRS width was 160.8 ± 28 ms and increased from 117.2 ± 34 ms at baseline. LP RV pacing resulted in left bundle branch block pattern on ECG and 37.8% QRS widening by 43.5 ± 29 ms.

Conclusion

TEE may guide LP implantation in the nonapical mid-RV position. Further studies are required to establish whether this technique reduces implant complications compared with conventional fluoroscopy.

The jugular approach for leadless pacing. A novel and safe alternative

AIMS

To evaluate safety of leadless pacemaker implantation through the internal jugular vein in a larger cohort with longer follow-up. Moreover, feasibility of non-apical pacing as well as relation between pacing site and QRS duration were assessed.

METHODS

82 consecutive patients, who received a leadless pacemaker though the internal jugular vein were included. Electrical parameters were measured at regular follow-up and any complications were registered. Paced QRS interval was compared for three pacing sites, RVOT, RV mid septum and RV apical septum.

RESULTS

In all patients the leadless pacemaker was implanted successfully. In 69 patients the device was implanted in a non-apical position. In 71% of cases, the device could be deployed at first attempt. The median fluoroscopy time was 4.4minutes (range 0.9-51-) The paced QRS interval was significantly narrower for non-apical pacing compared to apical pacing 156ms. vs 179 ms. P = 0.04 respectively. During mean follow-up of 16 months (range 0-43 months) electrical parameters remained stable. Two complications occurred which could be resolved during the implant procedure. There were no access site related complications.

CONCLUSION

The jugular approach for leadless pacemaker implantation is feasibly and may avoid vascular complications. It facilitates non-apical positioning of leadless pacemakers leading to a narrower paced QRS interval. The jugular approach allows for immediate post procedural ambulation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Sheath shape pattern during leadless pacemaker implantation

PURPOSE

Options for shaping the delivery sheath of leadless pacemakers (LPs) based on the cardiac anatomy of patients are limited. We predicted the shape of the LP sheath during implantation using preoperative computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with implanted LPs due to symptomatic bradyarrhythmia were divided into two groups, α-loop and non-α-loop, based on the shape of the LP delivery sheath head at implantation. Angles between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the interventricular septum (IVST), and the IVC and right ventricular apex (RVA) were measured by CT. The relationship between the final sheath shape and position of the IVC and the right or left side of the line drawn vertically from the deflection point of the sheath in the LAO view on fluoroscopy was assessed.

RESULTS

Angles between the IVC and IVST (44.4 ± 5.9° vs. 50.2 ± 6.8°) and IVC and RVA (52.5 ± 5.3° vs. 58.8 ± 7.8°) on CT were significantly (p < 0.01) smaller in the α-loop group. To predict the α-loop shape, a combined IVC-IVST angle < 50° and IVC-RVA angle < 55° revealed higher sensitivity (81.8%). The delivery sheath positioned right of the vertical line was more frequent in the α-loop group (90.9% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

When the preoperatively calculated angles of IVC to IVST and RVA on CT were narrow, the right side of the sheath in the IVC from the vertical line drawn from the deflection point in the LAO view indicated the need to shape the delivery sheath head into an α-loop during LP implantation.

Leadless pacemaker implantation sites confirmed by computed tomography and their parameters and complication rates

BACKGROUND

Implantations of leadless pacemakers in the septum lower the risk of cardiac perforation. However, the relationship between the implantation site and the success rate, complication rate, and pacemaker parameters are not well-investigated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation with postprocedural computed tomography (CT) between September 2017 and November 2020 were analyzed. Septum was targeted with fluoroscopic guidance with contrast injection. We divided patients into two groups based on the implantation site confirmed by CT: septal and non-septal, which included the anterior/posterior edge of the septum and free wall. We compared the complication rates and pacemaker parameters between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients underwent CT after the procedure; among them, 28 were included in the septal group and 39 were included in the non-septal group. The non-septal group had significantly higher R wave amplitudes (6.5 ± 3.3 vs. 9.7 ± 3.9 mV, p = .001), lower pacing threshold (1.0 ± 0.94 vs. 0.63 ± 0.45 V/0.24 ms, p = .02), and higher pacing impedance (615 ± 114.1 vs. 712.8 ± 181.3 ohms, p = .014) after the procedure compared to the septal group. Cardiac injuries were observed in four patients (one cardiac tamponade, one possible apical hematoma, two asymptomatic pericardial effusion), which were only observed in the non-septal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Leadless pacemaker implantation may be technically challenging with substantial number of patients with non-septal implantation when assessed by CT. Septal implantation may have a lower risk of cardiac injury but may lead to inferior pacemaker parameters than non-septal implantation.

Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis

Background

Leadless pacemakers have been designed as an alternative to transvenous systems which avoid some of the complications associated with transvenous devices. We aim to perform a systematic review of the literature to report the safety and efficacy findings of leadless pacemakers.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies reporting the safety, efficacy and outcomes of patients implanted with a leadless pacemaker. The pooled rate of adverse events was determined and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of adverse outcomes for leadless compared to transvenous pacemakers.

Results

A total of 18 studies were included with 2496 patients implanted with a leadless pacemaker and success rates range between 95.5 and 100%. The device or procedure related death rate was 0.3% while any complication and pericardial tamponade occurred in 3.1% and 1.4% of patients, respectively. Other complications such as pericardial effusion, device dislodgement, device revision, device malfunction, access site complications and infection occurred in less than 1% of patients. Meta-analysis of four studies suggests that there was no difference in hematoma (RR 0.67 95%CI 0.21–2.18, 3 studies), pericardial effusion (RR 0.59 95%CI 0.15–2.25, 3 studies), device dislocation (RR 0.33 95%CI 0.06–1.74, 3 studies), any complication (RR 0.44 95%CI 0.17–1.09, 4 studies) and death (RR 0.45 95%CI 0.15–1.35, 2 studies) comparing patients who received leadless and transvenous pacemakers.

Conclusion

Leadless pacemakers are safe and effective for patients who have an indication for single chamber ventricular pacing and the findings appear to be comparable to transvenous pacemakers.

Strategies to overcome complicated situations in leadless pacemaker implantation

Although leadless pacemaker implantation is not complicated, challenges exist in complex situations, which can be prevented and resolved with appropriate treatments including dealing with the abnormal venous access or choosing a superior vena cava approach, implanting at the septum rather than the apex, a snare assistant technique to deployment, assurance of solid fixation, and snaring dislodged device.

Pericardial effusion caused by accidently placing a Micra transcatheter pacing system into the coronary sinus

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemaker has been acknowledged as a promising pacing strategy to prevent pocket and lead-related complications. Although rare, cardiac perforation remains a major safety concern for implantation of Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 83-year-old female with low body mass index (18.9 kg m^-2) on dual anti-platelet therapy, was indicated for Micra TPS implantation due to sinus arrest and paroxysmal atrial flutter. The patient developed mild pericardial effusion during the procedure since the delivery catheter was accidentally placed into the coronary sinus for several times. Cardiac perforation with moderate pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade was detected 2 h post-procedure. The patient was treated with immediately pericardiocentesis and recovered without further invasive therapy.

CONCLUSION

Pericardial effusion caused by accidently placing a delivery catheter into the coronary sinus is rare but should be carefully considered in Micra TPS implantation, especially for those with periprocedural anti-platelet therapy.

Tine-Based Leadless Pacemaker: Strategies for Safe Implantation in Unconventional Clinical Scenarios

Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have emerged as a meaningful alternative to transvenous pacemakers for single-ventricular pacing. LPs eliminate many of lead- and pocket-associated complications observed with transvenous pacemakers. Owing to the lack of atrioventricular synchronous pacing until recently, the use of LP was generally reserved for those patients who either required minimal ventricular pacing or had permanent atrial fibrillation. The only commercially available LP is the Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra-TPS, Medtronic Inc. Fridley, Minnesota), which requires insertion of a 27-F (outer diameter) introducer sheath in the femoral vein. The LP is delivered to the right ventricle using a 23-F delivery catheter. Owing to the need for a large-bore sheath, the pivotal studies for the Micra transcatheter pacing system excluded patients with indwelling inferior vena cava filters and included only a few patients with bioprosthetic or repaired tricuspid valve. Subsequent real-world experience has demonstrated the overall safety and feasibility of LP placement, and use in various unconventional clinical settings has been validated, albeit with specific precautions. Additionally, incorporation of adjunctive techniques and strategies can improve the safety of the procedure in routine clinical settings as well. The objective of this state-of-the-art review is to highlight the key procedural elements to facilitate safe and efficient implantation of LP in routine as well as in unique clinical settings.

Tips and Tricks for Safe Retrieval of Tine-based Leadless Pacemakers

As leadless pacing (LP) use is expected to increase, it becomes increasingly essential that operators become familiar with the tools and techniques needed to retrieve an LP successfully. The purpose of this review is to describe a stepwise approach for the successful retrieval of tine-based LP devices, including ways to minimize complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Leadless pacemaker is a novel technology, and evidence supporting its use is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers implanted in the right ventricle. Methods and Results We searched PubMed and Embase for studies published before June 6, 2020. The primary safety outcome was major complications, whereas the primary efficacy end point was acceptable pacing capture threshold (≤2 V). Pooled estimates were calculated using the Freedman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Of 1281 records screened, we identified 36 observational studies of Nanostim and Micra leadless pacemakers, with most (69.4%) reporting outcomes for the Micra. For Micra, the pooled incidence of complications at 90 days (n=1608) was 0.46% (95% CI, 0.08%-1.05%) and at 1 year (n=3194) was 1.77% (95% CI, 0.76%-3.07%). In 5 studies with up to 1-year follow-up, Micra was associated with 51% lower odds of complications compared with transvenous pacemakers (3.30% versus 7.43%; odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70). At 1 year, 98.96% (95% CI, 97.26%-99.94%) of 1376 patients implanted with Micra had good pacing capture thresholds. For Nanostim, the reported complication incidence ranged from 6.06% to 23.54% at 90 days and 5.33% to 6.67% at 1 year, with 90% to 100% having good pacing capture thresholds at 1 year (pooled result not estimated because of the low number of studies). Conclusions Most studies report outcomes for the Micra, which is associated with a low risk of complications and good electrical performance up to 1-year after implantation. Further data from randomized controlled trials are needed to support the widespread adoption of these devices in clinical practice.

Individualized left anterior oblique projection based on pigtail catheter visualization facilitates leadless pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker positioning on the right ventricular (RV) septum during implantation is conventionally conducted utilizing two fixed fluoroscopy angles, a 45° left anterior oblique (LAO) and 35° right anterior oblique projection. However, placement location can be suboptimal, especially for leadless pacemakers (LPMs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and ease of LPM implantation using individualized LAO projection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing LPM implantation were prospectively included. The angle of the RV septum was recorded for each patient by studying the angle at which an RV pigtail catheter (RV-PC) could be seen edge on. This was then used as the preferred LAO projection angle for that patient. We evaluated the success rate and safety of this method. We also compared the RV septum angle as measured by this method versus that measured by chest CT.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients (mean age 80.6 ± 7.0 years, 15 females), LPM implantation was successful in 30. The pacemaker was implanted on the RV septum in 29 and on the free wall in one. LPM implantation was abandoned for anatomical reasons in one. Complications were limited to a groin arteriovenous fistula and one deep vein thrombosis. The angle of RV septum as measured by pigtail catheter and chest CT was not significantly different (CT: 54.8 ± 6.0°, RV pigtail catheter: 52.9 ± 6.1°, P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

Using an RV-PC to determine the preferred angle of LAO projection facilitates differentiation between the RV septum and free wall, which in turn facilitates optimal LPM placement.

Assessing safety of leadless pacemaker (MICRA) at various implantation sites and its impact on paced QRS in Indian population

Background

In this study we report our experience in implanting MICRA TPS (transcatheter pacing system) at various RV sites; observing its safety, and impact on paced QRS in Indian population.

Material & methods

35 patients with MICRA TPS deployed from March 2017 to December 2019 at Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, at RVOT, apical septum and mid septum of RV were enrolled in the study. These patents were followed up and impact of implantation site, procedure related complications, change in pacing parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction and duration of paced QRS were monitored.

Results

Sick sinus syndrome was the commonest indication of pacing in this study (51.5%), followed by high degree AV block (34.2%). Mean follow up of 1.4 years showed no change in left ventricular ejection fraction, electrical parameters or change in pacing thresholds after implantation. Mean pQRS was broadest (166.60 ms) in apically implanted MICRA TPS and narrowest in mid septum group 139.33 ms. Among 35 cases, in our study one patient developed pericardial effusion, and other had intermittent diaphragmatic pacing.

Conclusion

Among these three implantation sites mid septum deployment is associated with narrowest paced QRS in Indian population.

Single-chamber leadless pacemaker for atrial synchronous or ventricular pacing

Leadless pacing is a major breakthrough in the management of bradyarrhythmia. Results of initial clinical trials that have demonstrated a significant reduction in acute and long-term pacing-related complications have been confirmed by real-world experience in a broader spectrum of patients. Nonetheless current use of a leadless pacemaker is hampered by its limited atrial sensing and pacing capability, as well as battery life-span and retrievability. We review the current clinical outcome data, indications and contraindications, implantation and retrieval techniques, synchronous ventricular pacing, and other clinical considerations. We also provide an overview of the latest advancements in leadless pacing technology including device-to-device communication and energy harvesting technology.

Clinical outcomes of leadless pacemaker: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Transvenous pacemakers are associated with a significant amount of complications. Leadless pacemakers (LP) are emerging as an alternative to conventional devices. This article provides a systematic review of patient eligibility, safety and clinical outcomes of the LP devices.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search for articles describing the use of LP was conducted. Out of two databases, 24 articles were included in the qualitative analysis. These articles comprised a total of 4739 patients, with follow-up times of 1-38 months. Further information was obtained from 10 more studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From a population of 4739 patients included in the qualitative analysis, 4670 LP were implanted with success (98.5%). A total of 248 complications were described (5.23%) during the follow-up. The most common were pacing issues such as elevated thresholds, dislodgements or battery failure (68 patients), events at the femoral access site such as hemorrhage, hematoma or pseudoaneurysms (64 patients) and procedure related cardiac injuries such as cardiac perforation, tamponade or pericardial effusion (47 patients). There were 360 deaths during the follow-up and 11 were described as procedure or device related. Four studies presented the strategy of using a combined approach of atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) and LP implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Leadless pacemakers seem to have a relatively low complication rate. These devices may be a good option in patients with an indication for single-chamber pacing, in patients with conditions precluding conventional transvenous pacemaker implantations. Studies directly comparing LP and transvenous pacemakers and data on longer follow-up periods are needed.

Peak deflection index as a predictor of a free-wall implantation of contemporary leadless pacemakers

BACKGROUND

Leadless pacemakers are an effective treatment for bradycardia. However, some cases exhibit pericardial effusions, presumably associated with device implantations on the right ventricular free-wall. The present study was carried out to find the ECG features during ventricular pacing with a Micra, which enabled distinguishing free-wall implantations from septal implantations without using imaging modalities.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients who received Micra implantations in our facility were enrolled. The location of the device in the right ventricle was evaluated using echocardiography or computed tomography in order to determine whether the device was implanted on the septum (Sep group), apex (Apex group), or free-wall (FW group). The differences in the 12-lead ECG during ventricular pacing by the Micra were analyzed between the Sep and FW groups.

RESULTS

The body of the Micra was clearly identifiable in 22 patients. The location of the device was classified into Sep in 12 patients, Apex in 4, and FW in 6. The mean age was highest in the FW and lowest in the Sep group (82.7 ± 6.6 vs. 72.8 ± 8.7 years, p = 0.027). The peak deflection index (PDI) was significantly larger in the FW group than Sep/Apex group in lead V1 (Sep: 0.505 ± 0.010, Apex: 0.402 ± 0.052, FW: 0.617 ± 0.043, p = 0.004) and lead V2 (Sep: 0.450 ± 0.066, Apex: 0.409 ± 0.037, FW: 0.521 ± 0.030, p = 0.011), whereas there was no difference in the QRS duration, transitional zone, and QRS notching.

CONCLUSION

The PDI in V1 could be useful for predicting implantations of Micra devices on the free-wall and may potentially stratify the risk of postprocedural pericardial effusions.

Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: A comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid-septal, and apical implant sites

BACKGROUND

With its steerable transcatheter delivery system, the Micra can be deployed in nonapical positions within the right ventricle, potentially allowing reduction of the paced QRS width. We sought to evaluate the safety and long-term performance of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing using the Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS). We also compared the paced QRS between RVOT, mid-septal, and apical implant positions.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a Micra TPS implantation at the University Hospitals of Leuven were enrolled in this observational study. Right ventricular (RV) position of the device was assessed on per-procedural ventriculography. Paced QRS was analyzed and follow-up completed at 1 month and then every 6 months.

RESULTS

Among the 133 patients included (mean follow-up: 13 ± 11 months), 45 were implanted in the RVOT, 58 midseptally, and 30 at the apex. All implant procedures were successful and no pericardial effusion was encountered within the 30 days post-implant. Two major complications were reported with devices implanted at the apex. Pacing impedance was significantly higher in the RVOT compared to the mid-septal and apical position (P < .001). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude did not differ over time in either position. The median narrowest paced QRS duration was observed in the RVOT (142 ms) compared to mid-septal (159 ms; P < .001), and apical position (181 ms; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the Micra TPS in the RVOT is safe and feasible. Electrical performance over time was comparable to mid-septal and apical positions. The narrowest paced QRS complexes is achieved with RVOT pacing.