Increased risk of late pacemaker implantation after ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: A 10-year follow-up of a nationwide cohort

Novel method to avoid serious injurious effects on the atrioventricular nodal (AVN) conduction during catheter ablation of the AVN slow pathway utilizing cryofreezing energy

BACKGROUND

Slow pathway elimination of the atrioventricular node (AVN) is essential to treat AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, injury to the AVN conduction (IAVN) is one of the serious complications. Cryofreezing energy is expected to reduce the incidence of IAVN. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a novel method to avoid IAVN during cryoablation of AVNRT.

METHODS

A total of 157 patients (average age, 65.8 years; male, 71) suffering from AVNRT were included. Once the AVNRT terminated during cryo-ablation, then rapid atrial constant pacing (RACP) was performed during freezing at a rate lower 10 bpm than that inducing Wenchebach AV block in 74 (47.1 %) patients (Group A). The RACP rate was decreasingly reduced by 10 bpm in case of the occurrence of IAVN. When the RACP reached 100 bpm, the cryoablation was prematurely terminated. Group B patients (83 = 52.9 %) underwent cryoablation during sinus rhythm. All patients were allocated in a randomized fashion. We compared the severity of the IAVN between Groups A and B.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences at 12 months regarding the freedom from the AVNRT between Groups A and B. However, the duration of the IAVN was significantly longer in Group B than A (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences regarding the distance between the His recording sites and successful ablation sites between Groups A and B. No permanent IAVN requiring pacemaker implantation was provoked in either group.

CONCLUSION

RACP was useful to avoid sustained and serious IAVN during cryoablation of AVNRT.

Voltage and propagation mapping: New tools to improve successful ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Mapping system is useful in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and localization of anatomic variances. Voltage mapping identifies a low voltage area in the Koch triangle called low-voltage-bridge (LVB); propagation mapping identifies the collision point (CP) of atrial wavefront convergence. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the relationship between LVB and CP with successful site of ablation and identify standard value for LVB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the right atria were constructed from intracardiac recordings using the ablation catheter. Cut-off values on voltage map were adjusted until LVB was observed. On propagation map, atrial wavefronts during sinus rhythm collide in the site representing CP, indicating the area of slow pathway conduction. Ablation site was selected targeting LVB and CP site, confirmed by anatomic position on fluoroscopy and atrioventricular ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. LVB and CP were present in all patients. Postprocedural evaluation identified standard cut-off of 0.3-1 mV useful for LVB identification. An overlap between LVB and CP was observed in 23 (85%) patients. Procedure success was achieved in all patient with effective site at first application in 22 (81%) patients. There was a significant correlation between LVB, CP, and the site of effective ablation (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

We found correlation between LVB and CP with the site of effective ablation, identifying a voltage range useful for standardized LVB identification. These techniques could be useful to identify ablation site and minimize radiation exposure.

Relationship between the atrial-activation pattern around the triangle of Koch and successful ablation sites in slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Background

The precise details of atrial activation around the triangle of Koch (ToK) remain unknown. We evaluated the relationship between the atrial-activation pattern around the ToK and success sites for slow-pathway (SP) modification ablation in slow-fast atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

Methods

Thirty patients with slow-fast AVNRT who underwent successful ablation were enrolled. Atrial activation around the ToK during sinus rhythm was investigated using ultra-high-density mapping pre-ablation. The relationships among features of atrial-activation pattern and success sites were examined.

Results

Of 30 patients (22 cryoablation; 8 radiofrequency ablation), 26 patients had a collision site of two wavefronts of delayed atrial activation within ToK, indicating a success site. The activation-search function of Lumipoint software, which highlights only atrial activation with a spatiotemporal consistency, showed non-highlighted area on the tricuspid-annulus side of ToK. In 23 of the patients, a spiky potential was recorded at that collision site outside the Lumipoint-highlighted area. Fifteen cryoablation patients with a success site coincident with a collision site outside the Lumipoint-highlighted area had significantly more frequent disappearances of SP after initial cryoablation (46.7% vs. 0%, p = .029), fewer cryoablations (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 5.3 ± 1.3, p = .045), and shorter procedure times (170 ± 57 vs. 228 ± 91 min, p = .082) compared to the seven cryoablation patients without such sites. Four patients had transient AV block by ablation inside the Lumipoint-highlighted area with fractionated signals, but no patient developed permanent AV block or recurrence post-procedure (median follow-up: 375 days).

Conclusions

SP modification ablation at the collision site of atrial activation of the tricuspid-annulus side along with a spiky potential could provide a better outcome.

Electroanatomical Mapping System-Guided vs. Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Slow Pathway Ablation: A Randomized, Single-Center Trial

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for targeting the slow pathway (SP) in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). Previous data suggested that using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance could improve procedural outcomes when compared to using fluoroscopy alone. In this prospective study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of an electroanatomical mapping system (EAMS)-guided approach with an ICE-guided approach for SP ablation. Eighty patients undergoing SP ablation for AVNRT were randomly assigned to either the ICE-guided or EAMS-guided group. If the procedural endpoint was not achieved after 8 RF applications; patients were allowed to crossover to the ICE-guided group. The ICE-guided approach reduced the total procedure time (61.0 (56.0; 66.8) min vs. 71.5 (61.0; 80.8) min, p < 0.01). However, the total fluoroscopy time was shorter (0 (0-0) s vs. 83.5 (58.5-133.25) s, p < 0.001) and the radiation dose was lower (0 (0-0) mGy vs. 3.3 (2.0-4.7) mGy, p < 0.001) with EAMS-guidance. The ICE-guided group had a lower number of RF applications (4 (3-5) vs. 5 (3.0-7.8), p = 0.03) and total ablation time (98.5 (66.8-186) s vs. 136.5 (100.5-215.8) s, p = 0.02). Nine out of 40 patients (22.5%) in the EAMS-guided group crossed over to the ICE-guided group, and they were successfully treated with similar RF applications in terms of number, time, and energy compared to the ICE-guided group. There were no recurrences during the follow-up period. In conclusion, the utilization of ICE guidance during SP ablation has demonstrated notable reductions in procedural time and RF delivery when compared to procedures guided by EAMS. In challenging cases, an early switch to ICE-guided ablation may be the optimal choice for achieving successful treatment.

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping-Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Direct slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping-guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping-guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping-guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping-guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation.

RESULTS

Among 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DSPC mapping-guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.

Late pacemaker implantation after atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is associated with late pacemakers for AV block (AVB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pooled incidence of late pacemakers for AVB after CA of AVNRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Relevant studies were identified from 4 electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Trial Register) from inception to 2022. A random effects model was used to calculate the odds of late pacemakers in CA of AVNRT compared to atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). Of 533 articles screened, 13 were included in systematic review. CA for AVNRT was performed in 16,471 patients (mean age 54±17 years, 63% females), of which 68 (0.4%) underwent pacemaker implantation for late AVB. Meta-analysis was performed in 5 of the 13 studies (mean follow-up duration 7±4 years). Patients who underwent CA of AVNRT were older (58±17 vs 52±20 years, p<0.001), and more likely female (60% vs 41%, p<0.001) than AVRT. Pooled estimates of late pacemakers for AVB were higher in CA of AVNRT than AVRT (0.5% vs 0.2%, p=0.006), with CA in AVNRT associated with almost 2-fold increased odds of late pacemakers indicated for AVB (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.08-3.47, p=0.027) compared to AVRT.

CONCLUSION

AVNRT ablation is safe but associated with a low but definitely increased risk of requiring pacing in the later years due to AVB. This association is confirmed by pooling over 16,000 AVNRT patients receiving clinically indicated ablation and is helpful in providing informed consent for prospective patients undergoing ablation for AVNRT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Are there unknown long-term consequences of ablating the (incompletely) known?

Although atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Randomized trial of intracardiac echocardiography-guided slow pathway ablation

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow pathway (SP) in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is highly effective; however, it may require prolonged fluoroscopy and RF time. We postulated that visualization of the SP region with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could decrease ablation time, minimize radiation exposure, and facilitate SP ablation compared to the standard, fluoroscopy-guided approach.

METHODS

In our study, we randomized 91 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study and SP ablation for AVNRT into 2 groups: fluoroscopy-only (n = 48) or ICE-guided (n = 43) group. Crossover to ICE-guidance was allowed after 8 unsuccessful RF applications.

RESULTS

Mapping plus ablation time (mean ± standard deviation: 18.8 ± 16.1 min vs 11.6 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.031), fluoroscopy time (median [interquartile range]: 4.9 [2.93-8.13] min vs. 1.8 [1.2-2.8] min, p < 0.001), and total ablation time (144 [104-196] s vs. 81 [60-159] s, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the ICE group. ICE-guidance was associated with reduced radiation exposure (13.2 [8.2-13.4] mGy vs. 3.7 [1.5-5.8] mGy, p < 0.001). The sum of delivered RF energy (3866 [2786-5656] Ws vs. 2283 [1694-4284] Ws, p = 0.002) and number of RF applications (8 [4.25-12.75] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.001) were also lower with ICE-guidance. Twelve (25%) patients crossed over to the ICE-guided group. All were treated successfully thereafter with similar number, time, and cumulative energy of RF applications compared to the ICE group. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE-guidance during SP ablation significantly reduces mapping and ablation time, radiation exposure, and RF delivery in comparison to fluoroscopy-only procedures. Moreover, early switching to ICE-guided ablation seems to be an optimal choice in challenging cases.

Outcomes of supraventricular tachycardia ablation: Results from the Singapore ablation and cardiac devices registry

BACKGROUND

The Singapore Cardiac Databank was designed to monitor the performance and outcomes of catheter ablation. We investigated the outcomes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT)-ablation in a prospective, nationwide, cohort study.

METHODS

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular re-entry tachycardia (AVRT), or atrial tachycardia (AT)-ablations in Singapore from 2010 to 2018 were studied. Outcomes include acute success, periprocedural-complications, postoperative pacing requirement, arrhythmic recurrence and 1-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 2260 patients (mean age 45 ± 18 years, 50% female, 57% AVNRT, 37% AVRT, 6% AT), overall acute success rates of PSVT-ablation was 98.4% and increased in order of AT, AVRT, and AVNRT (p < .001). Periprocedural cardiac tamponade occurred in two AVRT patients. A total of 15 pacemakers (6 within first 30-days, 9 after 30-days) were implanted (seven AV block, eight sinus node dysfunction [SND]), with the highest incidence of pacemaker implantation after AT-ablation (5% vs. 0.6% AVNRT vs. 0.1% AVRT, p < .001). Repeat ablations (0.9% AVNRT, 7% AVRT, 4% AT, p < .001) were performed in 78 (3.5%) patients and 13 (0.6%) patients died within a year of ablation. Among outcomes considered adjusting for age, sex, PSVT-type and procedure-time, AT was independently associated with 6-fold increased odds of total (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 6.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-20.53) and late (AOR 6.38, 95% CI 1.39-29.29) pacemaker implantation, while AVRT was associated with higher arrhythmic recurrence with repeat ablations (AOR 4.72, 95% CI 2.36-9.44) compared to AVNRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary PSVT ablation is safe with high acute success rates. Long-term outcomes differed by nature of the PSVT.

Etiology and device therapy in complete atrioventricular block in pediatric and young adult population: Contemporary review and new perspectives

Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a total dissociation between the atrial and ventricular activity, in the absence of atrioventricular conduction. Several diseases may result in CAVB in the pediatric and young-adult population. Permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing is required in permanent CAVB, when the cause is neither transient nor reversible. Continuous RV apical pacing has been associated with unfavorable outcomes in several studies due to the associated ventricular dyssynchrony. This study aims to summarize the current literature regarding CAVB in the pediatric and young adult population and to explore future treatment perspectives.

Periprocedural, early, and long-term risks of pacemaker implantation after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia ablation: a French nationwide cohort

AIMS

Pacemaker implantation (PI) after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation is a dreadful complication. We aimed to assess periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All 27 022 patients who underwent latest AVNRT ablation in France from 2009 to 2017, were identified in the nationwide medicalization database. A control group of 305 152 patients hospitalized for arm, leg, or skin injuries with no history of AVNRT or supraventricular tachycardia were selected. After propensity score matching, both groups had mean age of 53 ± 18 years and were predominantly female (64%). During this 9-year period, 822 of 27 022 (3.0%) AVNRT patients underwent PI, with significant higher risk in propensity-matched AVNRT patients compared to propensity-matched controls [2.9% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio 3.4 (2.9-3.9), P < 0.0001]. This excess risk was significant during all follow-up, including periprocedural (1st month), early (1-6 months), and late (>6 months) risk periods. Annualized late risk per 100 AVNRT patients was 0.2%. In comparison to controls, excess risk was 0.2% in <30-year-old AVNRT patients; 0.7% in 30-50-year-old; 1.1% in 50-70-year-old and 6.5% over 70-year-olds. Risk for PI was also significantly different according to three procedural factors: centres, experience, and ablation date, with a 30% decrease since 2015.

CONCLUSION

Periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI were higher after AVNRT ablation compared to propensity-matched controls. Longer follow-up is needed as the excess risk seems to persist late after AVNRT ablation.

Catheter ablation via the left atrium for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A narrative review

Background

Since 1996, it has been recognized that catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) may require an approach through the left atrium.

Objective

The purposes are to present a case report and to provide a comprehensive narrative review on this topic.

Methods

A literature review of all articles that provided detailed information on patients who underwent catheter ablation via the left atrium for AVNRT was performed. The primary search queried PubMed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia" and "left." The secondary search was performed by manual review of reference lists and Google Scholar citations of manuscripts retrieved by the primary search. The review was limited to the English language.

Results

The searches yielded 30 articles that described 79 patients. A case report was added. Therefore, the final review consisted of 80 patients. The prevalence of left atrial ablation for patients with AVNRT undergoing catheter ablation at tertiary care centers was approximately 1%. Failed right atrial ablation, with or without coronary sinus ablation, was the most common indication for left atrial ablation. Pooled data from 3 cohort studies estimated the acute success rate for radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway at the septal or inferoparaseptal segments of the mitral valve annulus after failed right-sided ablation to be 90%. There were no reports of atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation.

Conclusion

Catheter ablation of the slow pathway via the left atrium is an important technique for AVNRT cases that are refractory to conventional ablation.

A prospective evaluation of the impact of individual RF applications for slow pathway ablation for AVNRT: Markers of acute success

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is highly effective for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Generally junctional rhythm (JR) is an accepted requirement for successful ablation however there is a lack of detailed prospective studies to determine the characteristics of JR and the impact on slow pathway conduction.

METHODS

Multicentre prospective observational study evaluating the impact of individual radiofrequency (RF) applications in typical AVNRT (slow/fast). Characteristics of JR during ablation were documented and detailed testing was performed after every RF application to determine outcome. Procedural success was defined as ≤1 AV nodal echo.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included (mean age 53 ± 18years, 57% female and a history of SVT 2.9 ± 4.7 years). RF (50w, 60°) ablation for AVNRT was applied in 301 locations with JR in 178 (59%). Successful slow pathway modification was achieved in 66 (99%) patients with slow pathway block in 30 (46%). Success was associated with JR in all patients. Success was achieved in six patients with RF < 10 s. There was no significant difference in the CL of JR during RF between effective (587 ± 150 ms) versus ineffective (611 ± 193 ms, p = .4) applications. Inadvertent junctional beat-atrial (JA) block with immediate termination of RF was observed in 19 (28%) patients with AVNRT no longer inducible in 14 (74%). Freedom from SVT was achieved in 66 (99%) patients at a mean follow up of 15 ± 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, JR was required during RF for acute success in AVNRT. Cycle length of JR during RF was not predictive of success. Although unintended JA block during faster JR was associated with slow pathway block, this is a precursor to fast pathway block and should not be intentionally targeted.

Delayed radiofrequency ablation efficacy in slow pathway ablation: a case report

BACKGROUND

The delayed effect of radiofrequency (RF) ablation was described in cases of accessory pathway and premature ventricular contraction ablation, as well as delayed atrioventricular (AV) block after slow pathway ablation.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of a female patient with AV nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), in whom the first electrophysiology study ended with acute failure of slow pathway ablation, despite using long steerable sheath, both right and left-sided ablation with >15 min of RF energy application and repeatedly achieving junctional rhythm. Six weeks afterwards, during scheduled three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping procedure, there was no proof of dual AV nodal conduction nor could the tachycardia be induced. Also, the patient did not have palpitations between the two procedures nor during the 12-month follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

This case illustrates that watchful waiting for delayed RF ablation efficacy in some cases of AVNRT ablation could be reasonable, in order to reduce the risk of complications associated with slow pathway ablation.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: How to Manage and Prevent Collateral Damage?

Radiofrequency catheter ablation has become the standard of care for the management of various arrhythmias and, in fact, the first-line therapy for many tachyarrhythmias. It entails creating scar tissue in the heart in regions where abnormal impulses form or propagate to restore normal cardiac conduction. As the heart is a complex organ and is surrounded by and related to many other anatomical structures, it is important to avoid the collateral damage that can happen from radiofrequency (RF) ablation on the endocardium as well as on the epicardium. This review explores methods for mitigating or limiting collateral damage during catheter ablation.