1
|
Giordano A, Mas-Peiro S, Fichtlscherer S, Schaefer A, Beyer M, Maisano F, Ascione G, Buzzatti N, Teles R, Brito J, Albuquerque F, Sondergaard L, Vanhaverbeke M, Quagliana A, Costa G, Barbanti M, Ferraro P, Morello A, Cimmino M, Albanese M, Pepe M, Bardi L, Giordano S, Cittadini A, Corcione N, Biondi-Zoccai G. Long-term outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Portico self-expanding valve. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:86-93. [PMID: 37391628 PMCID: PMC10808416 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02252-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a mainstay in the management of severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients, but there is uncertainty on their long-term effectiveness. We aimed to assess the long-term outcome of patients undergoing TAVI with the Portico valve. METHODS We retrospectively collected the data on patients in whom TAVI with Portico was attempted from 7 high-volume centres. Only patients theoretically eligible for 3 or more years of follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes, including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, reintervention for valve degeneration and hemodynamic valve performance were systematically assessed. RESULTS A total of 803 patients were included, with 504 (62.8%) women, mean age of 82 years, median EuroSCORE II of 3.1%, and 386 (48.1%) subjects at low/moderate risk. The median follow-up was 3.0 years (3.0; 4.0). The composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and reintervention for valve degeneration occurred in 37.5% (95% confidence interval: 34.1-40.9%), with all-cause death in 35.1% (31.8-38.4%), stroke in 3.4% (1.3-3.4%), myocardial infarction in 1.0% (0.3-1.5%), and reintervention for valve degeneration in 1.1% (0.6-2.1%). The mean aortic valve gradient at follow-up was 8.1 ± 4.6 mmHg, and at least moderate aortic regurgitation was present in 9.1% (6.7-12.3%). Independent predictors of major adverse events or death were: peripheral artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, atrial fibrillation, prior pacemaker implantation, EuroSCORE II, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Portico use is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were largely impacted by baseline risk factors and surgical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo Giordano
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Silvia Mas-Peiro
- Department of Cardiology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schaefer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Beyer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Maisano
- Department of Cardiac Surgery IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Ascione
- Department of Cardiac Surgery IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Buzzatti
- Department of Cardiac Surgery IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Rui Teles
- Division of Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Carnaxide, Portugal
| | - João Brito
- Division of Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Carnaxide, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - Giuliano Costa
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Barbanti
- Division of Cardiology, A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Paolo Ferraro
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Alberto Morello
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Michele Cimmino
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Michele Albanese
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Martino Pepe
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Luca Bardi
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Salvatore Giordano
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Antonio Cittadini
- Department of Medical and Translational Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Corcione
- Unità Operativa di Interventistica Cardiovascolare, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
- Unità Operativa di Emodinamica, Santa Lucia Hospital, San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pellegrini C, Garot P, Morice MC, Tamburino C, Bleiziffer S, Thiele H, Scholtz S, Schramm R, Cockburn J, Cunnington M, Wolf A, Barbanti M, Tchétché D, Pagnotta P, Gilard M, Bedogni F, Van Belle E, Vasa-Nicotera M, Chieffo A, Bogaerts K, Hengstenberg C, Capodanno D, Joner M. Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves - a SCOPE 2 subanalysis. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 18:e1077-e1087. [PMID: 36128956 PMCID: PMC9909458 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-00558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No detailed data on left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) exist from randomised clinical trials comparing the ACURATE neo and CoreValve Evolut devices. AIMS Our aim was to assess the incidence and impact of new LBBB and PPI with self-expanding prostheses from a powered randomised comparison. METHODS From the SCOPE 2 trial, 648 patients with no previous pacemaker were analysed for PPI at 30 days, and 426 patients without previous LBBB were adopted for analysis of LBBB at 30 days. Results: At 30 days, 16.5% of patients required PPI; rates were higher in CoreValve Evolut compared to ACURATE neo recipients (21.0% vs 12.3%; p=0.004). Previous right bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR] 6.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.19-11.73; p<0.001) was associated with an increased risk of PPI at 30 days, whereas the use of the ACURATE neo (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.81; p=0.005) was associated with a decreased risk. One-year mortality was similar in patients with and without new PPI. A total of 9.4% of patients developed persistent LBBB at 30 days, with higher incidences in CoreValve Evolut recipients (13.4% vs 5.5%; p=0.007). New LBBB at 30 days was associated with lower ejection fraction at 1 year (65.7%±11.0 vs 69.1%±7.6; p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS New LBBB and PPI rates were lower in ACURATE neo compared to CoreValve Evolut recipients. The ACURATE neo valve was associated with a lower risk of PPI at 30 days. No effect on 1-year mortality was determined for PPI at 30 days, while LBBB at 30 days was associated with reduced ejection fraction at 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Pellegrini
- Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philippe Garot
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay-Santé, Massy, France
| | - Marie-Claude Morice
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay-Santé, Massy, France
| | - Corrado Tamburino
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - S. Marco" - University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Sabine Bleiziffer
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Smita Scholtz
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Rene Schramm
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - James Cockburn
- Department of Cardiology, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Michael Cunnington
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander Wolf
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marco Barbanti
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular diseases and transplantation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Didier Tchétché
- Groupe CardioVasculaire Interventionnel, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paolo Pagnotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy
| | - Martine Gilard
- Department of Cardiology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | | | - Eric Van Belle
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera
- Department of Cardiology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Kris Bogaerts
- KU Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, I-BioStat, Leuven, Belgium and UHasselt, I-BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - S. Marco" - University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Michael Joner
- Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz- und Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Risk Stratification for Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195580. [PMID: 36233446 PMCID: PMC9571112 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI) is a common complication. Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a strong risk factor for PPI after TAVI. However, a patient-specific approach for risk stratification in this subgroup has not yet been established. Methods: We investigated TAVI patients with pre-existing RBBB to stratify risk factors for PPI and 1-year-mortality by detailed analysis of ECG data, RBBB morphology and degree of calcification in the implantation area assessed by computed tomography angiography. Results: Between 2010 and 2018, 2129 patients underwent TAVI at our institution. Among these, 98 pacemaker-naïve patients with pre-existing RBBB underwent a TAVI procedure. PPI, because of relevant conduction disturbances (CD), was necessary in 43 (43.9%) patients. PPI was more frequently indicated in women vs. men (62.1% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.004) and in men treated with a self-expandable vs. a balloon-expandable valve (58.3% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.035). ECG data (heart rhythm, PQ, QRS, QT) and RBBB morphology had no influence on PPI rate, whereas risk for PPI increased with the degree of calcification in the left septal His-/left bundle branch-area to a 9.375-fold odds for the 3rd tertile of calcification (1.639–53.621; p = 0.012). Overall, 1-year-mortality was comparable among patients with or without PPI (14.0% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.697). Conclusions: Patients with RBBB undergoing TAVI have a high risk of PPI. Among this subgroup, female patients, male patients treated with self-expandable valve types, patients with high load/degree of non-coronary LVOT calcification and patients with atrial fibrillation need enhanced surveillance for CD after procedure.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu S, Zhang E, Qian Z, Sun J, Zou F, Wang Y, Hou X, Zou J. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:911234. [PMID: 35837611 PMCID: PMC9275565 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims To date, the prognostic effects of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the mid- (1 year) to long-term (> 1 year) clinical and echocardiographic effects of post-procedural PPI in patients after TAVR. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 1 December 2021. Studies comparing clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between patients with and without post-TAVR PPI of ≥ 1-year follow-up were collected for further meta-analysis. Results A total of 39 studies comprising of 83,082 patients were included in this meta-analysis. At mid-term follow-up (1 year), the pooled results demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with post-procedural PPI than those without following TAVR (relative risk (RR), 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10–1.24; P < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71–1.03; P = 0.10) or heart failure rehospitalization (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58–1.44; P = 0.69) at 1-year follow-up. At long-term follow-up (> 1 year), post-TAVR PPI had negative effects on all-cause mortality (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09–1.28; P < 0.0001) and heart failure rehospitalization (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18–1.71; P = 0.0002). There was no difference in long-term cardiovascular mortality between the two groups (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97–1.36; P = 0.11). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not significantly different at baseline (mean difference, 1.40; 95% CI, –0.13–2.93; P = 0.07), but was significantly lower in the PPI group at 1-year follow-up (mean difference, –3.57; 95% CI, –4.88 to –2.26; P < 0.00001). Conclusion Our meta-analysis provides evidence that post-TAVR PPI has negative clinical and echocardiographic effects on patients at mid- to long-term follow-up. Further studies are urgently needed to explore the cause of these complications and optimize the treatment and management of patients requiring permanent pacing after TAVR. Systematic Review Registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021289935], identifier [CRD42021289935].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Xu
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Enrui Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiyong Qian
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jinyu Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Fengwei Zou
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Yao Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Hou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiangang Zou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doenst T, Schneider U, Can T, Caldonazo T, Diab M, Siemeni T, Färber G, Kirov H. Cardiac Surgery 2021 Reviewed. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 70:278-288. [PMID: 35537447 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PubMed displayed more than 35,000 hits for the search term "cardiac surgery AND 2021." We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) approach and selected relevant publications for a results-oriented summary. As in recent years, we reviewed the fields of coronary and conventional valve surgery and their overlap with their interventional alternatives. COVID reduced cardiac surgical activity around the world. In the coronary field, the FAME 3 trial dominated publications by practically repeating SYNTAX, but with modern stents and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). PCI was again unable to achieve non-inferiority compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in patients with triple-vessel disease. Survival advantages of CABG over PCI could be linked to a reduction in myocardial infarctions and current terminology was criticized because the term "myocardial revascularization" is not precise and does not reflect the infarct-preventing collateralization effect of CABG. In structural heart disease, new guidelines were published, providing upgrades of interventional treatments of both aortic and mitral valve disease. While for aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) received a primary recommendation in older and high-risk patients; recommendations for transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge treatment were upgraded for patients considered inappropriate for surgery. For heart team discussions it is important to know that classic aortic valve replacement currently provides strong signals (from registry and randomized evidence) for a survival advantage over TAVI after 5 years. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It can neither be complete nor free of individual interpretation, but provides up-to-date information for decision-making and patient information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schneider
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tolga Can
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Tulio Caldonazo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Diab
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Thierry Siemeni
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Gloria Färber
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Hristo Kirov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alkhouli M. Delayed Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Achilles' Heel? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2733-2737. [PMID: 34949398 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Alkhouli
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmad Y, Makkar R. New frontiers for improving outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The role of the conduction system and the impact of pacemakers. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:2048-2049. [PMID: 34419668 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yousif Ahmad
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Raj Makkar
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|