Relationship among body mass index, NT-proBNP, and mortality in decompensated chronic heart failure

The different risk of new-onset, chronic, worsening, and advanced heart failure: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and progressive syndrome associated with a poor prognosis. While it may seem intuitive that the risk of adverse outcomes varies across the different stages of HF, an overview of these risks is lacking. This study aims to determine the risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations associated with new-onset HF, chronic HF (CHF), worsening HF (WHF), and advanced HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic review of observational studies from 2012 to 2022 using five different databases. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, as well as 1-year HF hospitalization. Studies were pooled using random effects meta-analysis, and mixed-effects meta-regression was used to compare the different HF groups. Among the 15 759 studies screened, 66 were included representing 862 046 HF patients. Pooled 30-day mortality rates did not reveal a significant distinction between hospital-admitted patients, with rates of 10.13% for new-onset HF and 8.11% for WHF (p = 0.10). However, the 1-year mortality risk differed and increased stepwise from CHF to advanced HF, with a rate of 8.47% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.24-9.89) for CHF, 21.15% (95% CI 17.78-24.95) for new-onset HF, 26.84% (95% CI 23.74-30.19) for WHF, and 29.74% (95% CI 24.15-36.10) for advanced HF. Readmission rates for HF at 1 year followed a similar trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis of observational studies confirms the different risk for adverse outcomes across the distinct HF stages. Moreover, it emphasizes the negative prognostic value of WHF as the first progressive stage from CHF towards advanced HF.

Integration of imaging and circulating biomarkers in heart failure: a consensus document by the Biomarkers and Imaging Study Groups of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Circulating biomarkers and imaging techniques provide independent and complementary information to guide management of heart failure (HF). This consensus document by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) presents current evidence-based indications relevant to integration of imaging techniques and biomarkers in HF. The document first focuses on application of circulating biomarkers together with imaging findings, in the broad domains of screening, diagnosis, risk stratification, guidance of treatment and monitoring, and then discusses specific challenging settings. In each section we crystallize clinically relevant recommendations and identify directions for future research. The target readership of this document includes cardiologists, internal medicine specialists and other clinicians dealing with HF patients.

The contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in patients with advanced heart failure before and after left ventricular assist device implantation

The clinical significance of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is not fully explored. NT-proBNP concentrations are influenced by body composition, renal function and intracardiac pressures; dynamic measures pre- and post-LVAD implantation. We sought to identify the individual contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in advanced heart failure patients before and after LVAD implantation. We retrospectively collected data from 63 patients implanted with a LVAD with NT -proBNP measurements (2006-2019). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained through right heart catheterization (RHC). Univariable linear regression and multivariable stepwise regression models were used to analyze variables associated with NT-proBNP concentrations in the pre- and post-LVAD setting. Paired t-test was performed on a subpopulation of 13 patients with complete data. We found significant differences in all extracardiac (BMI, creatinine, eGFR) and all invasive hemodynamic measurements pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD. NT-proBNP decreased by 83 %, in the subpopulation of 13 patients: 736 pmol/L [IQR 498-1330] to 126 pmol/L [IQR 74.8-241.7]. In multivariable analysis, only creatinine remained significantly associated with NT-proBNP before LVAD implant (p = 0.016), whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was the only independent variable associated with NT-proBNP after LVAD implant (p < 0.0001). Creatinine and PCWP were the only independent factors associated with NT-proBNP concentrations before and after LVAD implantation, respectively. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were more closely associated with NT-proBNP concentration after LVAD than extracardiac factors and reversely pre-LVAD, suggesting that NT-proBNP serves as a useful biomarker of cardiac conditions post-LVAD implantation.

Diagnostic and prognostic considerations for use of natriuretic peptides in obese patients with heart failure

Natriuretic peptides (NPs, B-type natriuretic peptide /BNP and NT-proBNP) are universally used biomarkers with established cut-points to aid in the diagnosis of heart failure (HF). It has been demonstrated that an inverse relationship exists between obesity, defined by the body mass index (BMI), and NPs, such that the application of NPs to diagnostic algorithms in HF remains challenging in overweight and obese patients. Some have advocated that lowering the cut-offs for NPs or using a correction for high BMI may improve the diagnostic accuracy in obese individuals. The inverse relationship of NPs with high BMI is present in both HF with reduced (HFrEF) and with preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction, although levels tend to be higher in HFrEF. Nevertheless, data from several studies have shown that the prognostic value of NPs is preserved across BMI classes, and that increasing circulating levels of NPs correlate with adverse outcomes including all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations. While NPs can still be used in diagnosis of HF in obese individuals, lower thresholds and the clinical context should be utilized in decision making. Additionally, given the validated prognostic value even in obesity, NPs can be employed in risk-stratification of individuals with obesity and HF, although there remains limited evidence about use in those with severe obesity (BMI >40 kg/m²).