Identifying unique profiles of perceived dyspnea burden in heart failure

Sympathetic dysfunction is associated with worse fatigue and early and subtle symptoms in heart failure: an exploratory sex-stratified analysis

AIMS

Physical symptoms impact patients with heart failure (HF) despite treatment advancements; however, our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying HF symptoms remains limited, including sex differences therein. The objective of this study was to quantify associations between sympathetic markers [norepinephrine (NE) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)] and physical symptoms in patients with HF and to explore sex differences in these associations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a secondary analysis of combined data from two studies: outpatients with HF (n = 111), and patients prior to left ventricular assist device implantation (n = 38). Physical symptoms were measured with the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS) dyspnoea and early/subtle symptom subscales and the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) to capture dyspnoea, early symptoms of decompensation, and fatigue. Norepinephrine and DHPG were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Multivariate linear regression was used to quantify associations between symptoms and sympathetic markers. The sample (n = 149) was 60.8 ± 15.7 years, 41% women, and 71% non-ischaemic aetiology. Increased plasma NE and NE:DHPG ratio were associated with worse FACIT-F scores (P = 0.043 and P = 0.013, respectively). Increased plasma NE:DHPG ratio was associated with worse HFSPS early/subtle symptoms (P = 0.025). In sex-stratified analyses, increased NE:DHPG ratio was associated with worse FACIT-F scores (P = 0.011) and HFSPS early/subtle scores (P = 0.022) among women but not men.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HF, sympathetic dysfunction is associated with worse fatigue and early/subtle physical symptoms with associations stronger in women than men.

Mismatch identified in symptom burden profiles in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is considerable heterogeneity in symptom burden among lung transplant candidates that may not be explained by objective measures of illness severity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize symptom burden, identify distinct profiles based on symptom burden and illness severity, and determine whether observed profiles are defined by differences in social determinates of health (SDOH).

METHODS

This was a prospective study of adult lung transplant candidates. Symptoms were assessed within 3 months of transplant with the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). MSAS subscale (physical and psychological) scores range 0-4 (higher=more symptom burden). The lung allocation score (LAS) (range 0-100) was our proxy measure of illness severity. The MSAS subscales and LAS were used as continuous indicators in a latent profile analysis to identify distinct symptom-illness severity profiles. Comparative statistics were used to identify SDOH differences among observed profiles.

RESULTS

Among 93 candidates, 3 distinct symptom-illness severity profiles were identified: 71% had a mild profile in which mild symptoms (MSAS physical 0.49; MSAS psychological 0.57) paired with mild illness severity (LAS 38.59). Of the 29% mismatched participants, 9% had moderate symptoms (MSAS physical 0.88; MSAS psychological 1.47) but severe illness severity (LAS 88.02) and 20% had severe symptoms (MSAS physical 1.30; MSAS psychological 1.94) but mild illness severity (LAS 42.13). The two mismatch profiles were younger, more racially diverse, and had higher psychosocial risk scores.

CONCLUSION

Symptom burden is heterogenous, does not always reflect objective measures of illness severity, and may be linked to SDOH.

Distinct implications of body mass index in different subgroups of nonobese patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a latent class analysis of data from the TOPCAT trial

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a well-defined risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but it is associated with a better prognosis in patients with diagnosed HFpEF. The paradoxically poor prognosis in nonobese patients with HFpEF may be driven by a subset of high-risk patients, which suggests that the nonobese HFpEF subpopulation is heterogeneous.

METHODS

Latent class analysis (LCA) was adopted to identify the potential subgroups of 623 nonobese patients enrolled in the TOPCAT trial. The baseline characteristics of the identified nonobese subgroups were compared with each other and with the obese patients. The risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality, and an HF composite outcome were also compared.

RESULTS

Two subgroups of nonobese patients with HFpEF (the physiological non-obesity and the pathological non-obesity) were identified. The obese patients were younger than both nonobese subgroups. The clinical profile of patients with pathological non-obesity was poorer than that of patients with physiological non-obesity. They had more comorbidities, more severe HF, poorer quality of life, and lower levels of physical activity. Patients with pathological non-obesity showed low serum hemoglobin and albumin levels. After 2 years of follow-up, more patients in the pathological group lost ≥ 10% of body weight compared with those in the physiological group (11.34% vs. 4.19%, P = 0.009). The prognostic implications of the two subgroups were opposite. Compared to patients with obesity, patients with physiological non-obesity had a 47% decrease in the risk of HF composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.70, P<0.001) and a trend of decreased all-cause mortality risk (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-1.01, P=0.06), while patients with pathological non-obesity had a 59% increase (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.02, P<0.001) in all-cause mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Two subgroups of nonobese patients with HFpEF with distinct clinical profiles and prognostic implications were identified. The low BMI was likely physiological in one group but pathological in the other group. Using a data-driven approach, our study provided an alternative explanation for the "obesity paradox" that the poor prognosis of nonobese patients with HFpEF was driven by a pathological subgroup.

State of the Science: The Relevance of Symptoms in Cardiovascular Disease and Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Symptoms of cardiovascular disease drive health care use and are a major contributor to quality of life. Symptoms are of fundamental significance not only to the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and appraisal of response to medical therapy but also directly to patients' daily lives. The primary purpose of this scientific statement is to present the state of the science and relevance of symptoms associated with cardiovascular disease. Symptoms as patient-reported outcomes are reviewed in terms of the genesis, manifestation, and similarities or differences between diagnoses. Specifically, symptoms associated with acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, valvular disorders, stroke, rhythm disorders, and peripheral vascular disease are reviewed. Secondary aims include (1) describing symptom measurement methods in research and application in clinical practice and (2) describing the importance of cardiovascular disease symptoms in terms of clinical events and other patient-reported outcomes as applicable.

Patterns and predictors of dyspnoea following left ventricular assist device implantation

AIMS

Dyspnoea is a common symptom of heart failure (HF) that often prompts patients to seek treatment. Implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been associated with reduced dyspnoea but it is unclear if all patients experience similar improvements in dyspnoea over time following LVAD implantation. Our aim was to identify distinct trajectories of dyspnoea symptoms over time following LVAD implantation and predictors of dyspnoea trajectory. We hypothesized that at least two, distinct trajectories of dyspnoea would be observed following LVAD implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a secondary analysis of data from the Profiling Biobehavioral Responses to Mechanical Support in Advanced Heart Failure study. In the parent study, sociodemographic and clinical data were collected prior to LVAD implantation and at 1, 3, and 6 months following LVAD implantation from a sample (n = 101) of patients with advanced HF. Latent growth mixture modelling was performed to identify distinct trajectories of dyspnoea symptoms. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of dyspnoea trajectory. Two, distinct trajectories of dyspnoea symptoms were identified: sustained improvement and unsustained improvement. Participants who experienced sustained improvement (86.7% of sample) demonstrated large, significant improvement in dyspnoea from pre-implantation to 3 months post-implant followed by smaller, non-significant improvement from 3 to 6 months. Participants who experienced unsustained improvement (13.3% of sample) demonstrated initial improvement from pre-implantation to 3 months post-implantation followed by worsening of dyspnoea from 3 to 6 months. Greater depressive symptoms at baseline and living alone were significant predictors of unsustained improvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients experience different patterns of dyspnoea over time following LVAD implantation. Clinicians should inquire about living arrangements and depressive symptoms at each visit to determine risk of unsustained improvement in dyspnoea.

Background and Design of the Biological and Physiological Mechanisms of Symptom Clusters in Heart Failure (BIOMES-HF) Study

BACKGROUND

Symptoms, which often cluster together, are a significant problem in heart failure (HF). There is considerable heterogeneity in symptom burden, particularly in the vulnerable transition period after a hospitalization for HF, and the biological underpinnings of symptom during transitions are unclear. The purpose of this paper is to describe the background and design of a study that addresses these knowledge gaps, entitled "Biological and Physiological Mechanisms of Symptom Clusters in Heart Failure" (BIOMES-HF).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

BIOMES-HF is a prospective gender- and age-balanced longitudinal study of 240 adults during the 6-month transition period after a HF hospitalization. The aims are to: 1) identify clusters of change in physical symptoms, 2) quantify longitudinal associations between biomarkers and physical symptoms, and 3) quantify longitudinal associations between physical frailty and physical symptoms among adults with heart failure. We will measure multiple symptoms, biomarkers, and physical frailty at discharge and then at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months post-hospitalization. We will use growth mixture modeling and longitudinal mediation modeling to examine changes in symptoms, biomarkers, and physical frailty post-HF hospitalization and associations therein.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative study will advance HF symptom science by utilizing a multi-biomarker panel and the physical frailty phenotype to capture the multifaceted nature of HF. Using advanced quantitative modeling, we will characterize heterogeneity and identify potential mechanisms of symptoms in HF. As a result, this research will pinpoint amenable targets for intervention to provide better, individualized treatment to improve symptom burden in HF.

BRIEF LAY SUMMARY

Adults with heart failure may have significant symptom burden. This study is designed to shed light on our understanding of the role of biological and physiological mechanisms in explaining heart failure symptoms, particularly groups of co-occurring symptoms, over time. We will explore how symptoms, biomarkers, and physical frailty changes after a heart failure hospitalization. The knowledge generated from this study will be used to guide the management and self-care for adults with heart failure.

Do patient-reported outcome measures measure up? A qualitative study to examine perceptions and experiences with heart failure proms among diverse, low-income patients

Background

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) used to evaluate the health status of patients with heart failure (HF) but has predominantly been tested in settings serving predominately white, male, and economically well-resourced populations. We sought to examine the acceptability of the shorter version of the KCCQ (KCCQ-12) among racially and ethnically diverse patients receiving care in an urban, safety-net setting.

Methods

We conducted cognitive interviews with a diverse population of patients with heart failure in a safety net system to assess their perceptions of the KCCQ-12. We conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data then mapped themes to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model of Behavior framework.

Results

We interviewed 18 patients with heart failure and found that patients broadly endorsed the concepts of the KCCQ-12 with minor suggestions to improve the instrument’s content and appearance. Although patients accepted the KCCQ-12, we found that the instrument did not adequately measure aspects of health care and quality of life that patients identified as being important components of managing their heart failure. Patient-important factors of heart failure management coalesced into three main themes: social support, health care environment, and mental health.

Conclusions

Patients from this diverse, low-income, majority non-white population experience unique challenges and circumstances that impact their ability to manage disease. In this study, patients were receptive to the KCCQ-12 as a tool but perceived that it did not adequately capture key health components such as mental health and social relationships that deeply impact their ability to manage HF. Further study on the incorporation of social determinants of health into PROMs could make them more useful tools in evaluating and managing HF in diverse, underserved populations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00410-9.