Identification of endothelial cell surface antigens encoded by genes other than HLA. A combined immunoprecipitation and proteomic approach for the identification of antigens recognized by antibodies against endothelial cells in transplant recipients

Outcome-based Risk Assessment of Non-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring.

METHODS

Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection.

Effects of serum from mismatched patients with solid organ transplantation on the activation of microvascular cultures isolated from adipose tissues

BACKGROUND

Aggregating the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens on the endothelial membrane has been known to elicit an activation, an underlying mechanism of chronic rejection in organ transplant recipients. The current study aims at examining the endothelial responses using HLA typed microvascular cultures from human adipose tissues upon exposure to the serum that contain corresponding antibodies collected from mismatched transplant recipients.

METHODS

We have successfully cultured 30 microvascular cultures and typed their HLAs. They are functionally competent to respond to inflammatory TNF-α stimulation and the aggregating monoclonal antibody against HLA Class I. The post-transplantation serum was collected either from the recipients with pathologically diagnosed chronic rejection or from the recipients without rejection. We determined their activation either by double-staining the endothelial cells in crude cultures with flow cytometry or by quantifying cytokine releases in purified endothelial cells using ELISA.

RESULTS

Under our current protocol, adipose tissue cultures are functionally intact in regard to its responses to TNF-alpha and anti-HLA Class I antibody. We observed that the post-transplantation serum with rejection contained the pathogenic antibodies and led to proinflammatory activation, as demonstrated by not only increased CD54+/CD31+ and CD106+/CD31+ cell counts but also inflammatory cytokine releases including MCP-1, IL-8 and RANTES.

CONCLUSION

This methodological study provides the feasibility of examining the pathogenicity of the alloantibodies in mis-transplant serum. Potentially, the endothelial activation elicited as a result of exposure can be used as an alternative readout for chronic rejection.

SIGNIFICANCE

We prototype an ex vivo model that enables us to examine whether allogenic antibodies from the recipient can functionally activate microvascular endothelial cells from the donor adipose tissues. This system can be further developed as crossmatch using cellular responses as readouts for chronic rejection for post-transplant surveillance.

The role of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: a complex deliberation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is tremendous interest in understanding when, if, and how non-HLA antibodies contribute to allograft injury. Numerous non-HLA target antigens have been identified and sensitization to these targets have been associated with delayed allograft function, rejection, and allograft failure. This review focuses on the clinical utility of HLA antibody testing, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current clinical studies, and the need for defining characteristics to inform non-HLA antibody pathogenicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies continue to show associations between non-HLA antibodies and rejection and reduced allograft survival across multiple transplanted organ types. The worst clinical outcomes continue to be observed among recipients testing positive for both non-HLA and donor-specific HLA antibodies. Mechanistic insights from both animal and clinical studies support a model in which tissue injury accompanied by an inflammatory environment influence non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity.

SUMMARY

Immune triggers that lead to non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity are complex and poorly understood. The ability of non-HLA antibodies to mediate allograft injury may depend upon their affinity and strength (titer), target specificity, density of the target antigen, and synergy with donor-specific HLA antibodies.

Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in the serum of patients with acute renal allograft rejection using iTRAQ labelling technology

Transplantation is currently the best treatment for patients with end‑stage renal disease. However, acute rejection (AR) is the major source of failure in renal transplantation. The current best practice for the diagnosis of AR involves renal biopsy, but it is invasive, time‑consuming, costly and inconvenient. Sensitive and less invasive detection of AR episodes in renal transplant patients is essential to preserve allograft function. The present study applied isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) mass spectrometry to analyze serum protein expression in patients with AR and healthy controls. Overall, 1,399 proteins were identified. Using a cut‑off of Q<0.05 and a fold change of >1.2 for the variation in expression, 109 proteins were identified to be differentially expressed between the AR and control groups, 72 of which were upregulated and 37 were downregulated. Several proteins, including properdin, keratin 1, lipoprotein(a) and vitamin D‑binding protein, may have roles in the pathogenesis of AR. The present study focused on iTRAQ‑based proteomic profiling of serum samples in AR. Insight from the present study may help advance the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of AR and identify potential novel biomarkers of AR for further characterization.

Sensitization to endothelial cell antigens: Unraveling the cause or effect paradox

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) have been correlated with increased acute and chronic rejection across all organ types and early graft dysfunction in kidney and heart transplantation. Nevertheless, the lack of appropriate tools and clear criteria for defining injurious versus non-injurious AECAs prohibits their routine inclusion in clinical risk assessments and diagnostic algorithms for antibody mediated injury. Clinical characterization of AECAs is complicated due to the wide range of polymorphic and non-polymorphic antigens expressed across different vascular tissues and the diverse array of specificities observed between individuals. This complexity is also reflected in the broad spectrum of reported injury phenotypes. AECAs detected at time of allograft dysfunction may represent biomarkers of past vascular injury or active contributors to a current rejection process. New tools within the fields of proteomics, genomics, bioinformatics, and imaging are currently being validated and hold great promise for unraveling the AECA paradox.

Endothelial precursor cell cross-match using Tie-2-enriched spleen cells

BACKGROUND

Non-HLA antibodies against human endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in pre-transplant recipient serum can have a deleterious influence on the graft. EPC enriched from peripheral blood have been commonly used for EPC cross-matching. In the present study, we describe cross-matches using EPC enriched from fresh or frozen-thawed spleen cell preparations, thereby widening the sample source for deceased-donor cross-matching and retrospective studies.

METHODS

EPC cross-matches were performed retrospectively using spleen cells and the flow cytometric XM-ONE cross-match test kit.

RESULTS

Healthy controls (n = 28) showed no IgG antibodies against EPC. When sera of 11 random dialysis patients were studied, 2 patients (18%) exhibited IgG EPC antibodies. When pre-transplant sera of 20 kidney graft recipients with good long-term graft outcome (serum creatinine 1.0 ± 0.2 mg/dL measured 2463 ± 324 days post-transplant) were investigated using frozen-thawed and then separated Tie-2-enriched spleen cells of the original transplant donor, 3 patients (15%) had pre-transplant IgG EPC antibodies. When pre-transplant sera of 5 patients with intra-operative graft loss were studied employing the original donor spleen cells, 4 (80%) patients showed IgG EPC antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-matches with spleen cell-derived EPC using the XM-ONE assay are technically possible. Our very preliminary experience suggests clinical relevance.

Impact of adipose tissue or umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells on the immunogenicity of human cord blood derived endothelial progenitor cells

The application of autologous endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) transplantation is a promising approach in therapeutic cardiovascular diseases and ischemic diseases. In this study, we compared the immunogenicity of EPCs, adipose tissue (AD)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and umbilical cord (UC)-derived MSCs by flow cytometry and the mixed lymphocyte reaction. The impact of AD-MSCs and UC-MSCs on the immunogenicity of EPCs was analyzed by the mixed lymphocyte reaction and cytokine secretion in vitro and was further tested by allogenic peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) induced immuno-rejection on a cell/matrigel graft in an SCID mouse model. EPCs and AD-MSCs express higher levels of MHC class I than UC-MSCs. All three kinds of cells are negative for MHC class II. UC-MSCs also express lower levels of IFN-γ receptor mRNA when compared with EPCs and AD-MSCs. EPCs can stimulate higher rates of proliferation of lymphocytes than AD-MSCs and UC-MSCs. Furthermore, AD-MSCs and UC-MSCs can modulate immune response and inhibit lymphocyte proliferation induced by EPCs, mainly through inhibition of the proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Compared with UC-MSCs, AD-MSCs can significantly improve vessel formation and maintain the integrity of neovascular structure in an EPC+MSC/matrigel graft in SCID mice, especially under allo-PBMC induced immuno-rejection. In conclusion, our study shows that AD-MSC is a powerful candidate to minimize immunological rejection and improve vessel formation in EPC transplantation treatment.

Analysis of Sera of Recipients with Allograft Rejection Indicates That Keratin 1 Is the Target of Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are usually directed against the surface antigens on the vascular endothelial cells. Clinical studies suggest a pathogenic role for nonhuman leukocyte antigen in antibody-mediated rejection; however, the antigens on the donor vascular endothelium that serve as the first-line targets for an immune response during allograft rejection have not been fully identified. Here, we used immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry to identify antigens from the sera of kidney transplant recipients who were experiencing antibody-mediated rejection. Keratin 1 (KRT1) was identified as a novel antigenic target expressed on endothelial cells. To validate our finding, we produced recombinant proteins representing the three most common alleles of KRT1. The serum used for immunoprecipitation showed a strong reaction to KRT1 recombinants in western blot and ELISA. In the kidney transplant cohort, more AECA-positive recipients than AECA-negative recipients had KRT1 antibodies (32.2% versus 11.9%, p = 0.002). Sera from 255 renal recipients were tested by ELISA. Of the 77 recipients with deteriorating graft function (serum creatinine > 120 μmol/L), 23 had anti-KRT1 antibodies. KRT1-IgG positivity was, therefore, associated with a higher risk of kidney transplant rejection (29.9% (23/77) versus 16.9% (30/178), p = 0.0187). A better understanding of this antigenic target will improve long-term allograft survival.

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Studies analyzing the role of antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in large series of kidney transplant recipients are scarce, and HLA, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-related chain A (MICA), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor have not been formally excluded as targets.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

324 kidney transplant recipients who were negative for anti-HLA, anti-MICA, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies were tested for AECAs in pre- and posttransplantation serum samples.

PREDICTORS

AECA-positive (preformed [pre⁺/post⁺] vs de novo [pre^-/post⁺]) versus AECA-negative (pre^-/post^-) before or after transplantation.

OUTCOMES

Patient mortality, transplant loss, and acute rejection events.

RESULTS

66 (20%) patients were AECA positive (39 [12%] preformed, 27 [8%] de novo) and 258 (80%) were AECA negative. During a follow-up of 10 years, 7 (18%) AECA pre⁺/post⁺ patients had rejections compared with 14 (52%) AECA pre^-/post⁺ and 57 (22%) AECA pre^-/post^- recipients (OR, 3.80; P=0.001). AECA pre^-/post⁺ status emerged as an independent risk factor for transplant rejection compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- group (OR, 5.17; P<0.001). However, AECA pre⁺/post⁺ and AECA pre^-/post⁺ patients did not show higher risk for either patient death (ORs of 1.49 [P=0.7] and 1.06 [P=0.9], respectively) or transplant loss (ORs of 1.22 and 0.86, respectively; P for both = 0.8) compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- population.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study. Posttransplantation sera were collected before or after rejection, entailing a nearly cross-sectional relationship between the exposure and outcome. Lack of identification of precise antigens for AECAs.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo AECAs may be associated with rejection. These antibodies might serve as biomarkers of endothelium damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Presence of MICA-DSA and Successful Renal Re-Transplant with Negative-MICA Virtual Crossmatch

The presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) against the MICA antigen results in high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of a transplanted kidney, especially in patients receiving a re-transplant. We describe the incidence of acute C4d+ AMR in a patient who had received a first kidney transplant with a zero HLA antigen mismatch. Retrospective analysis of post-transplant T and B cell crossmatches were negative, but a high level of MICA alloantibody was detected in sera collected both before and after transplant. The DSA against the first allograft mismatched MICA*018 was in the recipient. Flow cytometry and cytotoxicity tests with five samples of freshly isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells demonstrated the alloantibody nature of patient’s MICA-DSA. Prior to the second transplant, a MICA virtual crossmatch and T and B cell crossmatches were used to identify a suitable donor. The patient received a second kidney transplant, and allograft was functioning well at one-year follow-up. Our study indicates that MICA virtual crossmatch is important in selection of a kidney donor if the recipient has been sensitized with MICA antigens.

Humoral Immune Response and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation

HLA antibodies can damage a kidney transplant. In January 2013, consensus guidelines from The Transplantation Society were published regarding technical aspects of HLA antibody determination, as well as their potential significance in the pre- and posttransplantation periods. During the past 2 years, new studies have been reported, but controversies remain. In this article, these new data related to HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation are reviewed and compared to relevant prior research. Pretransplantation sensitization issues are discussed, including the new more sensitive assays (flow cytometry and solid-phase immunoassays such as Luminex single-antigen bead assays). A positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch remains an absolute contraindication to transplantation, although a positive flow cytometry crossmatch is only a relative contraindication. Positivity only by solid-phase assays increases the risk for acute rejection and transplant loss, but acceptable cutoffs are not defined. The sensitizing effect of red blood cell transfusions is substantiated. Following allograft failure, continued immunosuppression decreases the risk of sensitization, whereas overall, the effect of nephrectomy remains uncertain. Regarding the posttransplantation period, new data are available concerning the timing and significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whereas some centers report DSA appearance after years, others detect DSA within months. The prominence of class II DSA, especially DQ, in the posttransplantation period is noted. The relevance of non-HLA antibodies is discussed, including anti-endothelial cell antibodies, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A antibodies, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies.

Antibody-mediated graft injury: complement-dependent and complement-independent mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is emerging as the leading cause of chronic rejection and allograft failure. Traditionally, the mechanisms of graft injury mediated by donor-specific antibodies beyond complement activation were not well appreciated. However, an evolving paradigm of Fc-independent antibody functions, along with clinical recognition of C4d-negative AMR, has increased awareness of the action of antibodies leading to endothelial activation and dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Herein, we address current clinical trends, including the signature of microvascular inflammation in biopsies of grafts undergoing AMR, the prevalence of antibodies to human leukocyte antigen class II DQ locus (HLA-DQ) and non-HLA targets, and the functional characterization of HLA immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses and complement-fixing capacity. We also discuss recent experimental evidence revealing new mechanisms of endothelial and smooth muscle cell activation by HLA antibodies, which may contribute to vascular inflammation and chronic rejection. Finally, we touch upon novel discoveries of the interplay between antibodies, the complement system, and CD4 T-cell-mediated alloimmunity.

SUMMARY

The current literature suggests that, although complement-fixing antibodies may have some prognostic value for graft outcome, complement-independent mechanisms of graft injury are increasingly relevant. Therapeutic strategies, which target endothelial activation induced by antibodies may ameliorate vascular inflammation and mononuclear cell infiltration characteristic of AMR.