HLA antibodies are associated with deterioration of kidney allograft function irrespective of donor specificity

Association between PIRCHE-II scores and de novo allosensitization after reduction of immunosuppression during SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Before the availability of mRNA vaccines, many transplant centers chose to significantly reduce maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The extent to which this increases the risk of allosensitization is unclear.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we analyzed 47 KTRs from March 2020 to February 2021 who underwent substantial reduction of maintenance immunosuppression during SARS-CoV-2 infection. KTRs were followed at 6 and 18 months concerning the development of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) antibodies (DSA). The HLA-derived epitope mismatches were calculated using the predicted indirectly recognizable HLA-epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithm.

RESULTS

In total, 14 of 47 KTRs (30%) developed de novo HLA antibodies after the reduction of maintenance immunosuppression. KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores and higher PIRCHE-II scores for the HLA-DR locus were more likely to develop de novo HLA antibodies (p = .023, p = .009). Furthermore, 4 of the 47 KTRs (9%) developed de novo DSA after reduction of maintenance immunosuppression, which were exclusively directed against HLA-class II antigens and also showed higher PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-class II. The cumulative mean fluorescence intensity of 40 KTRs with preexisting anti-HLA antibodies and 13 KTRs with preexisting DSA at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained stable after the reduction of maintenance immunosuppression (p = .141; p = .529).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the HLA-derived epitope mismatch load between donor and recipient influences the risk of de novo DSA development when immunosuppression is temporarily reduced. Our data further suggest that reduction in immunosuppression should be made more cautiously in KTRs with high PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-class II antigens.

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies in renal transplantation, a meta-analysis

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation remains controversial and unclear. To address the clinical relevance of HLA-DP antibodies on the outcomes in renal transplantation, we performed a random effect model meta-analysis through a systematic review from inception to December 31, 2021. The outcome was graft loss or acute rejection. Finally five articles were identified as our inclusion criteria. The study which reported 1166 patients included in the final meta-analysis of de novo HLA-DP antibodies after transplantation showed an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.10, P = 0.002, I²  = 52%). In the subgroup study, we established that patients with HLA-DP DSA after renal transplantation had a 8.85-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP DSA (p = 0.003).While as for HLA-DP NDSA after renal transplantation, 2.73-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP antibodies (p = 0.04). Besides, the studies which reported 487 patients included in the final meta-analysis of preformed HLA-DP antibodies did not show an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 0.79-26.16, P = 0.09, I²  = 57%). The results of our meta-analysis suggested that de novo HLA-DP antibodies especially de novo HLA-DP DSA had a significant deleterious impact on the renal transplant risk of graft loss or acute rejection, while preformed HLA-DP antibodies had a no significant deleterious impact on the risk. The routine detection of HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation seems to be very important and may be as one of noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

T-Cell Epitopes Shared Between Immunizing HLA and Donor HLA Associate With Graft Failure After Kidney Transplantation

CD4⁺ T-helper cells play an important role in alloimmune reactions following transplantation by stimulating humoral as well as cellular responses, which might lead to failure of the allograft. CD4⁺ memory T-helper cells from a previous immunizing event can potentially be reactivated by exposure to HLA mismatches that share T-cell epitopes with the initial immunizing HLA. Consequently, reactivity of CD4⁺ memory T-helper cells toward T-cell epitopes that are shared between immunizing HLA and donor HLA could increase the risk of alloimmunity following transplantation, thus affecting transplant outcome. In this study, the amount of T-cell epitopes shared between immunizing and donor HLA was used as a surrogate marker to evaluate the effect of donor-reactive CD4⁺ memory T-helper cells on the 10-year risk of death-censored kidney graft failure in 190 donor/recipient combinations using the PIRCHE-II algorithm. The T-cell epitopes of the initial theoretical immunizing HLA and the donor HLA were estimated and the number of shared PIRCHE-II epitopes was calculated. We show that the natural logarithm-transformed PIRCHE-II overlap score, or Shared T-cell EPitopes (STEP) score, significantly associates with the 10-year risk of death-censored kidney graft failure, suggesting that the presence of pre-transplant donor-reactive CD4⁺ memory T-helper cells might be a strong indicator for the risk of graft failure following kidney transplantation.

Pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies and risk for poor first-year renal transplant outcomes: results from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

The aim of this study was to analyze first year renal outcomes in a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort comprising 2215 renal transplants, with a special emphasis on the presence of pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). All transplants had a complete virtual crossmatch and DSA were detected in 19% (411/2215). The investigated composite endpoint was a poor first-year outcome defined as (i) allograft failure or (ii) death or (iii) poor allograft function (eGFR ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m² ) at one year. Two hundred and twenty-one (221/2215; 10%) transplants showed a poor first-year outcome. Rejection (24/70; 34%) was the most common reason for graft failure. First-year patient's death was rare (48/2215; 2%). There were no statistically significant differences between DSA-positive and DSA-negative transplants regarding composite and each individual endpoint, as well as reasons for graft failure and death. DSA-positive transplants experienced more frequently rejection episodes, mainly antibody-mediated rejection (both P < 0.0001). The combination of DSA and any first year rejection was associated with the overall poorest death-censored allograft survival (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, presence of pre-transplant DSA per se does not affect first year outcomes. However, DSA-positive transplants experiencing first year rejection are a high-risk population for poor allograft survival and may benefit from intense clinical surveillance.