Frequency, phenotype, and genotype of minute gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach: an autopsy study

[Mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: an overview]

Mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are uncommon. They vary from reactive tumefactive lesions and benign neoplasms to highly aggressive sarcomas. Among them, GI stromal tumors (GISTs) are most common, followed, with less frequency, by smooth muscle and neurogenic tumors. The major challenge resides in correctly identifying GISTs and providing a comprehensive report (including risk assessment and genotyping) that represents the basis for an optimized surgical-oncological treatment and/or adjuvant therapy. On the other hand, the challenge of benign lesions is to find a good name (well understandable and reproducible diagnostic term) that helps avoid diagnostic ambiguity and prognostic uncertainty so that overprognostication and overtreatment can be prevented. Moreover, several recently described genetically defined benign and malignant entities need be correctly diagnosed due to their special "targeted" therapeutic options and to further characterize their clinicopathological and biological properties in the future. These recent entities include aggressive epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (ALK-RANBP2-driven), malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (EWSR1-ATF1/CREB-related), NTRK-rearranged neoplasms, and, most recently, colorectal NUTM1-rearranged sarcomas. This review highlights the major clinicopathological features of gastrointestinal mesenchymal lesions in light of recent developments.

Cross-testing of major molecular markers indicates distinct pathways of tumorigenesis in gastric adenocarcinomas and synchronous gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Small subtype of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (micro-GIST, MG) is usually asymptomatic and is frequently found incidentally in association with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). The background of this coincidence is still an open question. This study comprehensively characterized nine MGs and GACs present in the same surgical specimen by cross-testing the markers of the major pathogenetic pathways of both tumor types. All of the MGs were immunohistochemically positive for CD117/KIT, CD34, and DOG1. DOG1 was also detected in four GACs. Four MGs carried mutations in c-KIT (exons 9, 11, and 13) and two cases in PDGFRα (exon 18). None of the GACs carried activating mutations in c-KIT or PDGFRα. MMR immunopanel identified one GAC as microsatellite unstable tumor. No EBV-positive tumor was found. According to the TCGA molecular classification, one GAC was categorized in the MSI subgroup, three GACs in the genomically stable subgroup, and the rest into the chromosomal instability subgroup. Although a common carcinogenic effect cannot be ruled out, our data suggest a distinct molecular background in the evolvement of the synchronous MGs and GACs. The presence of a MG in gastric resection specimens may be indicative of the development of synchronous malignant tumors in or outside the stomach.

Which size is the best cutoff for primary small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor?

Background

The biological behavior of primary small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gGIST) is indolent. The cutoff size categorizing small gGIST continues to be controversial. To date, there is no consensus regarding whether it should be 1 cm, 2 cm, or another size. We aimed to find a new cutoff size.

Methods

Retrospective clinicopathological and prognosis data of patients with small gGIST from January 1998 to January 2015 were collected among five medical centers in southern China. Tumor size was divided into two groups: <1 cm (Mirco group) and 1-2 cm (Small group). We compared the clinicopathological index and prognosis between these two groups and identified a new cutoff size to define small gGIST.

Results

During this 18-year period, there were 276 patients with primary small gGIST treated at these five medical centers. The range of tumor size was 0.2-2.0 cm. The median tumor size was 1.0 cm. The range of the mitotic count was 0-70/50 high power fields (HPFs) with counts ≤5/50 HPFs in 259 patients (93.8%), 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 7 patients (2.5%), and counts >10/50 HPFs in 10 patients (3.6%). The median follow-up time was 38 months (3-156 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 98.7% in the entire group. Using Pearson correlation analysis, there was a positive correlation between the mitotic count and tumor size as a continuous variable (r=0.164, P=0.006). There were 137 patients in the Micro group and 139 cases in the Small group. In the Micro group, mitotic counts were ≤5/50 HPFs in 134 patients, 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 0 patients, and counts >10/50 HPFs in 3 patients; mitotic counts in the Small group were counts ≤5/50 HPFs in 125 patients, 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 7 patients, >10/50 HPFs in 7 patients. There was a statistically significant difference between these two groups (P=0.002); the Small group had more intermediate/high-risk cases. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), we observed that 1.15 cm was the new cutoff size to separate low-risk cases and intermediate/high-risk cases (AUC =0.707, P=0.004, sensitivity =0.824, 1-specificity =0.429).

Conclusions

Primary small gGIST has a good prognosis; gGIST <1 cm can be regarded as benign tumors that only requires endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) follow-up. The proportion of potential intermediate/high-risk disease is high for patients with 1-2 cm gGIST. These patients should be treated with caution and the tumors should be resected if necessary. These results indicate that 1.15 cm may be the new cutoff size to separate small gGIST from large gGIST, but further studies are needed for verification.

Molecular Profile of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Sixty-Eight Patients from a Single Swiss Institution

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. It has distinct molecular features and primarily affects the KIT and PDGFRA genes.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to assess the molecular profile of 68 GIST patients who were sequenced consecutively between 2014 and 2019 at our institute of pathology.

METHODS

Our cohort comprised 60 primary and 8 metastatic GIST patients; 43 and 57% of the cases, respectively, were analyzed by Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Of the 60 primary GIST patients, 47 (78%) showed a KIT mutation; 2 cases showed a double KIT mutation, and 1 of these was a therapy-naive GIST. Nine (15%) patients harbored a PDGFRA mutation, 2 (3%) had a BRAF mutation, 1 (2%) had a PIK3CA mutation, and 1 (2%) did not show any mutation. One BRAF and the PIK3CA mutation have not been described in GIST before. All metastatic GIST harbored exclusively KIT mutations.

CONCLUSION

A retrospective analysis of GIST sequenced at our institute revealed incidences of KIT and PDGFRA mutations comparable to those in other cohorts from Europe. Interestingly, we found 2 previously undescribed mutations in the BRAF and PIK3CA genes as well as 1 treatment-naive case with a double KIT mutation in exon 11.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of endoscopic surgery, the clinicopathological features, and prognoses of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

Small gastric GIST patients (diameter: 0.10-2.00 cm) resected endoscopically in Zhongshan Hospital were retrospectively identified and clinicopathological features and outcomes were collected. The relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and tumor recurrence was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal tumor diameter for predicting malignant potential.

RESULTS

All lesions were completely removed by endoscopy and En bloc resection was 98.5%. The most frequent location was the gastric fundus (60.3%) and the average diameter of all lesions was 1.20 cm (range: 0.10-2.00 cm). Mitoses were calculated as more than 5/50 HPF in 44 (6.8%) patients and nuclear atypia was moderate in 243 (37.5%) patients, severe in 1 (0.2%). Necrosis, mucosal infiltration, and vascular infiltration were detected in 8 (1.2%), 5 (0.7%), and 3 (0.5%) patients, respectively. Tumor size was positively correlated with mitotic index (P < 0.001) and nuclear atypia (P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 54 months, four patients were confirmed local recurrence. ROC curve analysis identified 1.45 cm as the best cut-off value to predict malignant potential (95% CI: 0·694-0·774). Survival analysis showed that patients with tumor diameters larger than 1.45 cm were associated with more local recurrences after resection (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgery is feasible and safe for small gastric GISTs, especially those in favorable locations. Small gastric GISTs bear a good prognosis as a whole but those with diameters larger than 1.45 cm should receive more intensive surveillance or undergo endoscopic surgery.

Overexpression of CD55 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in gastric stromal tumors

Backgrounds: Accumulating evidences have demonstrated that CD55 can protect cells from complement-mediated attack, and is involved in tumor dedifferentiation, migration, invasiveness, and metastasis. However, the role of CD55 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been investigated. Aims: Our study aimed to analyze the expression of CD55 in gastric GISTs and its correlations with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Materials and methods: A total of 118 gastric GIST patients were included in our study. CD55 expression in GIST tissue samples was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Cumulative survival was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with gastric GISTs. Results: Of 118 gastric GISTs patients included in our study, 44 (37.3%) were positive for CD55 expression. Positive CD55 expression in gastric GISTs was closely associated with tumor size (13.52±7.35 vs 5.07±1.90 cm, respectively; P<0.001), Ki 67 labeling index (P=0.001), mitotic counts (P=0.005), NIH risk classification (P<0.001), PLR (P<0.001), and metastasis at initial diagnosis (P=0.002). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that tumor size (P<0.001), mitotic counts (P<0.001), Ki 67 labeling index (P<0.001), PLR (P<0.001), metastasis at initial diagnosis (P=0.031), and CD55 expression (P<0.001) were statistically significant risk factors affecting PFS of patients with gastric GISTs. Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that mitotic counts, Ki 67 labeling index, and CD55 expression were independent predictors of PFS for gastric GISTs. Conclusion: CD55 may be a potential prognostic marker in gastric GISTs patients.

Clinicopathological Outcomes and Prognosis of Elderly Patients (≥ 65 Years) with Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection: a Multicenter Data Review

BACKGROUND

The most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is the stomach, and gastric GISTs (gGISTs) occur most often in elderly patients. However, the clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and prognosis of elderly patients with gGISTs remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinicopathological and prognostic data for patients with primary gGISTs who underwent curative-intent resection at 10 medical centers in China from 1998 to 2015.

RESULTS

Over the 18 years, 10 medical centers treated 1846 patients with primary gGISTs by curative-intent resection. The median age was 59 (range 18-91) years. The patients were classified into two groups according to age, namely an elderly group (≥ 65 years of age) and a nonelderly group (< 65 years of age). The elderly group had more comorbidities (40.7% vs 23.5%, p = 0.011), a higher rate of postoperative complications (14.4% vs 8.7%, p = 0.031), and a lower proportion of intermediate/high-risk patients who received adjuvant therapy (30.0% vs 66.8%, p = 0.001) than did the nonelderly group. Regarding pathological outcomes, a significant difference in tumor necrosis was observed between the two groups (p = 0.002), and more cases of tumor necrosis occurred in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group. Regarding postoperative recovery outcomes, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that age, postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, tumor size, mitotic count, modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk category, and tumor necrosis were factors that affected disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analysis showed that modified NIH risk category was the only independent factor affecting DFS. The 5-year DFS rates in the nonelderly and elderly groups were 88.1% and 81.4%, respectively (p = 0.034), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90.4% and 85.5% (p = 0.038), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the treatment patterns for elderly patients with gGISTs remain the same as those for young patients with gGISTs. Elderly gGIST patients had more comorbidities and postoperative complications than did nonelderly gGIST patients, and fewer elderly gGIST patients received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Elderly gGIST patients also had a higher rate of tumor necrosis and worse DFS and OS than did young gGIST patients. Further exploration into the diagnosis and treatment patterns of elderly patients is therefore essential.

Genomic aberrations in cell cycle genes predict progression of KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

BACKGROUND

Activating mutations of the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT are early events in the development of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Although GISTs generally remain dependent on oncogenic KIT during tumor progression, KIT mutations alone are insufficient to induce malignant behavior. This is evidenced by KIT-mutant micro-GISTs, which are present in up to one-third of normal individuals, but virtually never progress to malignancy.

METHODS

We performed whole exome sequencing on 29 tumors obtained from 21 patients with high grade or metastatic KIT-mutant GIST (discovery set). We further validated the frequency and potential prognostic significance of aberrations in CDKN2A/B, RB1, and TP53 in an independent series of 71 patients with primary GIST (validation set).

RESULTS

Using whole exome sequencing we found significant enrichment of genomic aberrations in cell cycle-associated genes (Fisher's Exact p = 0.001), most commonly affecting CDKN2A/B, RB1, and TP53 in our discovery set. We found a low mutational tumor burden in these 29 advanced GIST samples, a finding with significant implications for the development of immunotherapy for GIST. In addition, we found mutation of spliceosome genes in a minority of cases, implicating dysregulation of splicing as a potential cancer promoting mechanism in GIST. We next assessed the prognostic significance of CDKN2A, RB1 or TP53 mutation/copy loss in an independent cohort of 71 patients with primary GIST. Genetic events (mutation, deletion, and/or LOH) involving at least one of the three genes examined were found in 17% of the very low-risk, 36% of the low-risk, 42% of the intermediate risk, 67% of the high-risk/low mitotic-count, and in 86% of the high-risk/high mitotic-count group. The presence of cell cycle-related events was associated with a significantly shorter relapse-free survival (median 67 months versus not reached; p < 0.0001) and overall survival (Log Rank, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that genomic events targeting cell cycle-related genes are associated with GIST progression to malignant disease. Based on this data, we propose a model for molecular pathogenesis of malignant GIST.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 276 cases of primary small (≤ 2 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter data review

BACKGROUND

Till present, there are still controversies over the epidemiology, pathological features, types of surgical treatment, and prognoses of primary small gastric GISTs (gGISTs).

METHODS

From January 1998 to January 2015, patients with primary small gGIST admitted from four high-volume medical centers of the Southern China were enrolled and their data were analyzed to evaluate their clinicopathological features, treatment and prognostic factors to provide evidence-based medical experience for clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 276 primary small gGIST cases over a period of 18 years were investigated and had a median age of 60 years (range 27-91 years old). Regarding the tumor sites, 24 (8.7%) cases were in the cardia of the stomach, 107 (38.8%) in the fundus, 117 (42.4%) in the gastric body, and 28 (10.1%) in the gastric antrum. Eleven patients (4.0%) underwent a preoperative biopsy. A total of 137 (49.6%), 75 (27.2%), and 64 (23.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic, open resection, and endoscopic resection, respectively. Sixty-four patients (23.2%) had local endoscopic resection, 172 (62.3%) had wedge resection, 7 (2.5%) had proximal gastrectomy, 19 (6.9%) had distal gastrectomy, and 14 (5.1%) had total gastrectomy. Mitotic counts were ≤ 5/50, (5-10)/50, and > 10/50 per HPF in 259 (93.8%), 7 (2.5%), and 10 (3.6%) cases, respectively. There were 259 cases (97.1%) of spindle cell type, 7 (2.5%) epithelial cell types and one case (0.4%) of mixed type. Immunohistochemistry showed 74.6% (206/276), 98.2% (271/276), and 97.4% (269/276) of the patients had co-expression of CD34+, CD117+, and DOG-1+, respectively. Thirty-nine patients underwent genetic testing (39/276, 14.1%). Three patients (1.1%) had positive resection margin. Five high-risk patients received follow-up treatment with imatinib with a median follow-up time of 38 months (range 3-156 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Though the incidence of primary small gGISTs increased per annum, the overall survival prognoses were high. Surgery or endoscopic resection was the primary mode of treatment. Pathological features of primary small gGISTs were similar to large gGISTs, and to achieve a timely surgical intervention, the identification of intermediate- and high-risk cases should be a future focus of study.

Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal tract. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal located within the muscle layer and are characterized by over-expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT. Pathologically, diagnosis of a GIST relies on morphology and immunohistochemistry [KIT and/or discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1 (DOG1) is generally positive]. The prognosis of this disease is associated with the tumor size and mitotic index. The standard treatment of a GIST without metastasis is surgical resection. A GIST with metastasis is usually only treated by tyrosine kinase inhibitors without radical cure; thus, early diagnosis is the only way to improve its prognosis. However, a GIST is usually detected as a SEL during endoscopy, and many benign and malignant conditions may manifest as SELs. Conventional endoscopic biopsy is difficult for tumors without ulceration. Most SELs have therefore been managed without a histological diagnosis. However, a favorable prognosis of a GIST is associated with early histological diagnosis and R0 resection. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are critical for an accurate diagnosis of SELs. EUS-FNA is safe and effective in enabling an early histological diagnosis and adequate treatment. This review outlines the current evidence for the diagnosis and management of GISTs, with an emphasis on early management of small SELs.

Dovitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour refractory and/or intolerant to imatinib

Background:

This multicentre phase II trial (DOVIGIST) evaluated the antitumour activity of dovitinib as second-line treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) refractory to imatinib or who do not tolerate imatinib.

Methods:

Patients received oral dovitinib 500 mg day⁻¹, 5 days on/2 days off, until GIST progression or unacceptable toxicity, with an objective to evaluate efficacy, assessed as the disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks. Tumour assessment and response to dovitinib therapy were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) and the Choi criteria. Secondary objectives included assessment of progression-free survival (PFS), safety and tolerability, and DCR at the end of treatment.

Results:

Thirty-eight of the 39 patients enrolled had histologically confirmed GIST. The DCR at 12 weeks was 52.6% (90% confidence interval (CI), 38.2–66.7%) meeting the preset efficacy criterion for the primary end point. The objective response rate (complete response+partial response) was 2.6% (1 of 38; 90% CI, 0.1–11.9%), and 5.3% (n=2; 90% CI, 0.9–15.7%) at the end of the study. The median PFS was 4.6 months (90% CI, 2.8–7.4 months). Dose interruption was required in 26 patients (66.7%), of which 18 (69.2%) were due to adverse events. The most frequently observed grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (n=7), fatigue (n=5), vomiting (n=4), hypertriglyceridaemia (n=4), and γ-glutamyltransferase increase (n=4).

Conclusions:

Dovitinib is an active treatment for patients with GIST who are intolerant to imatinib or whose GIST progresses on imatinib.

Genetic progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: mechanisms and molecular interventions

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcomas in humans. Constitutively activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the initiating oncogenic events. Most metastatic GISTs respond dramatically to therapies with KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors. Asymptomatic and mitotically-inactive KIT/PDGFRA-mutant "microGISTs" are found in one third of adults, but most of these small tumors never progress to malignancy, underscoring that a progression of oncogenic mutations is required. Recent studies have identified key genomic abnormalities in GIST progression. Novel insights into the genetic progression of GISTs are shedding new light on therapeutic innovations.

Application of laparoscopy, endoscopy and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) constitute the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, among which 60%-70% are located in the stomach. All GISTs have malignant potential, varying from small lesions to aggressive sarcomas. Surgical resection with negative margins remains the best treatment for GISTs. Lymphadenectomy is not necessary because GISTs rarely metastasize to lymph nodes. Because of these biological behavior characteristics, the advantages of minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic surgery can be fully reflected in the surgical management of GISTs. The advent of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery has broadened the scope and enhanced the safety of minimally invasive surgical treatment of GISTs. In this paper we will discuss the application of laparoscopy, endoscopy and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in the treatment of GISTs.

Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend performing EUS to characterize subepithelial lesions (SELs) discovered on upper endoscopy (EGD), followed by surveillance if no high-risk features are identified. However, limited data are available on the impact of and compliance with surveillance recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the natural history of SELs<30 mm in size evaluated by EUS and to determine the degree of patient compliance with surveillance recommendations.

DESIGN

Prospective registry.

SETTING

Two tertiary centers.

PATIENTS

We studied 187 consecutive adult patients referred for EUS evaluation of foregut SELs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Proportion of patients in whom SELs change in size or echo-features and compliance with follow-up recommendations.

RESULTS

Surveillance was recommended in 65 patients with hypoechoic SELs (44.6% women, age 59.5±13.2 years); of these, 29 (44.6%) underwent surveillance EUS as recommended and were followed for a median of 30 months (range, 12-105). During follow-up, 16 SELs (25%) increased in size, with a mean increase of 3.4±3.9 mm (range, 1-15). No changes in echo-texture of the SELs were observed. One patient was referred to surgery during follow-up (because of SEL growth>30 mm).

LIMITATIONS

Short follow-up duration; compliance was a secondary aim.

CONCLUSIONS

During a median follow-up of 30 months, growth in size was observed in 25% of small foregut SELs. However, change in size was minimal, and only 1 patient was referred for surgery based on surveillance EUS findings. Compliance with surveillance recommendations is poor, with fewer than 50% of patients undergoing surveillance EUS as recommended.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor - an evolving concept

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The discovery that these tumors, formerly thought of smooth muscle origin, are indeed better characterized by specific activating mutation in genes coding for the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) CKIT and PDGFRA and that these mutations are strongly predictive for the response to targeted therapy with RTK inhibitors has made GISTs the typical example of the integration of basic molecular knowledge in the daily clinical activity. The information on the mutational status of these tumors is essential to predict (and subsequently to plan) the therapy. As resistant cases are frequently wild type, other possible oncogenic events, defining other "entities," have been discovered (e.g., succinil dehydrogenase mutation/dysregulation, insuline growth factor expression, and mutations in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway). The classification of disease must nowadays rely on the integration of the clinico-morphological characteristics with the molecular data.

Regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical evidence and place in therapy

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare malignancies, and historically had a poor prognosis, with little benefit from traditional anticancer therapies. The management of GISTs has undergone a paradigm change in recent years with the detection of activating mutations in the majority of these tumors. This knowledge has led to the development of targeted treatments which have dramatically improved benefit rates and survival. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, has become the standard of care for both those with high-risk resected GIST, and as first-line therapy in metastatic GIST. However, some patients demonstrate innate resistance to imatinib or, for many, resistance develops despite an initial response. Other tyrosine kinase inhibitors with a broader spectrum of action, such as sunitinib and sorafenib, have been investigated and show some benefit after the use of imatinib. Regorafenib, an orally available multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity, has also demonstrated preclinical evidence of activity against a number of solid tumors and further studies have proven it to be effective in GISTs following failure of standard therapy, with manageable toxicity profile. It has now received licensing approval in a number of countries both for the treatment of GISTs and for colorectal cancer, and further research is ongoing. With a number of potential agents now available to treat this disease, clinicians must now consider questions of timing and sequencing to maximize the benefit from these treatments, and the role that new agents such as regorafenib could play in further advancing changes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: what do we know now?

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract, arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal, primarily in the stomach and small intestine. They manifest a wide range of morphologies, from spindle cell to epithelioid, but are immunopositive for KIT (CD117) and/or DOG1 in essentially all cases. Although most tumors are localized at presentation, up to half will recur in the abdomen or spread to the liver. The growth of most GISTs is driven by oncogenic mutations in either of two receptor tyrosine kinases: KIT (75% of cases) or PDGFRA (10%). Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib is effective in controlling unresectable disease; however, drug resistance caused by secondary KIT or PDGFRA mutations eventually develops in 90% of cases. Adjuvant therapy with imatinib is commonly used to reduce the likelihood of disease recurrence after primary surgery, and for this reason assessing the prognosis of newly resected tumors is one of the most important roles for pathologists. Approximately 15% of GISTs are negative for mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. Recent studies of these so-called wild-type GISTs have uncovered a number of other oncogenic drivers, including mutations in neurofibromatosis type I, RAS genes, BRAF, and subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase complex. Routine genotyping is strongly recommended for optimal management of GISTs, as the type and dose of TKI used for treatment is dependent on the mutation identified.

Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach: identification of precursor for clinical gastrointestinal stromal tumor using c-kit and α-smooth muscle actin expression

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. To find precursors for clinical GISTs of the stomach, small gastric stromal tumors of less than 3 cm were collected and examined immunohistochemically with analysis of the KIT mutation. Sixty-eight of 74 lesions were classified into 4 representative groups according to the expression of c-kit and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA): group A, c-kit diffusely positive and αSMA negative (18 cases); group B, c-kit diffusely positive and αSMA focally positive (13); group C, c-kit focally positive and αSMA diffusely positive (27); and group D, c-kit negative and αSMA diffusely positive (10). Of the 4 groups, groups A and B of c-kit diffuse expression showed higher cellularity and labeling indices of p27(Kip1) and Ki-67 than did groups C and D of diffuse αSMA expression. Incidence of KIT exon 11 mutation in groups A and B was 86% (25/29), whereas that in groups C and D was 0% (0/20). Small gastric stromal tumors with c-kit diffuse expression were considered precursors for clinical GIST because they were significantly different from c-kit focally positive or negative tumors. The mutation of KIT is considered as an early event in tumorigenesis of GIST.

Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Small submucosal tumors (SMT) without symptoms are frequently found by endoscopic and radiological examinations. To find proper diagnostic measures and therapeutic indications for histologically undiagnosed SMT, we reviewed published articles in PubMed between 1990 and March 2013 using the key words 'submucosal tumor' and the name of a specific disease. SMT is observed in a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and conditions, including compression by extra-GI organs and lesions, congenital tumors, inflammation, and benign as well as malignant neoplastic lesions. In the diagnosis of diseases and decision-making for therapy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may play a key role. Symptomatic SMT and SMT histologically diagnosed as malignant or potentially malignant tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) should be treated by surgery. SMT >5 cm, SMT increasing in size and those with'high-risk features' including irregular border, heterogeneous internal echo such as anechoic area, and heterogeneous enhancement by contrast media may also be removed by surgery. Laparoscopic approach is feasible for gastric GIST <5 cm and this is considered less invasive than the open approach. Emerging techniques using flexible endoscopes appear less invasive, but require further evidence and are still under clinical study. Correct diagnosis of SMT is challenging; however, EUS and EUS-FNA are useful in the histological diagnosis and clinical decision-making. In the future, minimally invasive approaches may be a mainstream of surgical treatment for small SMT.

Therapeutic targeting of c-KIT in cancer

INTRODUCTION

Mutated forms of the receptor tyrosine kinase c-KIT are "drivers" in several cancers and are attractive targets for therapy. While benefits have been obtained from use of inhibitors of KIT kinase activity such as imatinib, especially in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), primary resistance occurs with certain oncogenic mutations. Furthermore, resistance frequently develops due to secondary mutations. Approaches to addressing both of these issues as well as combination therapies to optimise use of KIT kinase inhibitors are discussed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the occurrence of oncogenic KIT mutations in different cancers and the molecular basis of their action. The action of KIT kinase inhibitors, especially imatinib, sunitinib, dasatinib and PKC412, on different primary and secondary mutants is discussed. Outcomes of clinical trials in GIST, acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), systemic mastocytosis and melanoma and their implications for future directions are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Analysis of KIT mutations in individual patients is an essential prerequisite to the use of kinase inhibitors for therapy, and monitoring for development of secondary mutations that confer drug resistance is necessary. However, it is unlikely that KIT inhibitors alone can lead to cure. KIT mutations alone do not seem to be sufficient for transformation; thus identification and co-targeting of synergistic oncogenic pathways should lead to improved outcomes.

Promoting role of cholecystokinin 2 receptor (CCK2R) in gastrointestinal stromal tumour pathogenesis

The cholecystokinin 2 receptor (CCK2R/CCKBR) is expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We sought to investigate the role of CCK2R in GIST pathogenesis. Molecular characterization of CCK2R was performed on a heterogeneous cohort of 50 GISTs. In addition, CCK2R expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), using tissue microarray (TMA) containing 292 GISTs, two cases of hyperplasia of interstitial Cajal's cells (ICC) and six gastric microscopic GISTs. Mono-allelic loss of the CCK2R/11p15 allele was identified in 13.7% of GISTs, having no impact on the level of CCK2R transcript expression. No CCK2R mutations were found. The CCK2Ri4sv, CCK2R splice variant with retention of intron 4 was detected in six of 20 tumours analysed. Wild-type CCK2R transcripts were commonly expressed (57.1% of cases) and this expression was highly correlated with gastric primary site of GISTs (p < 0.001). At the protein level, expression of CCK2R in incidental ICC hyperplasia and early stages of gastric GIST development was documented, and its gastric association was confirmed on GIST-TMA by IHC. To explore the in vivo effect of CCK2R activation on tumour growth, gastrin versus placebo was administered intraperitoneally in nude mice carrying human GIST xenografts. The tumour volume was followed for 10 weeks. The effect of this stimulation on tumour cell proliferation/apoptosis was assessed by IHC and KIT/PKC-θ signalling was evaluated by western blotting (WB). In vivo experiments showed a two-fold increase in the volume of tumours which were exposed to gastrin in comparison with non-exposed controls (p = 0.03), with a significant increase in mitotic activity (p = 0.04) and Ki-67 proliferation index (p = 0.008). By WB, gastrin stimulation resulted in hyper-activation of KIT and PKC-θ kinases, and in evident PI3K-AKT pathway over-activation. Our results indicate a promoting role of CCK2R on GIST tumourigenesis, particularly in tumours of gastric origin.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided diagnosis of subepithelial tumors

Subepithelial lesions are frequently discovered during routine endoscopic examinations. These lesions represent a wide spectrum of heterogeneous benign to malignant conditions. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic. There is no consensus regarding how to manage these lesions. Over the last 2 decades, the approach to these lesions has significantly improved owing to the introduction of endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration, immunohistochemical staining methods, and different treatment options. This article discusses the nature of subepithelial lesions, focusing on the most recent developments that use endoscopic ultrasonography to diagnose and manage these lesions.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are a paradigm for the development of personalized treatment for cancer patients. The nearly simultaneous discovery of a biomarker that is reflective of their origin and the presence of gain-of-function kinase mutations in these tumours set the stage for more accurate diagnosis and the development of kinase inhibitor therapy. Subsequent studies of genotype and phenotype have led to a molecular classification of GIST and to treatment optimization on the basis of molecular subtype. The study of drug-resistant tumours has advanced our understanding of kinase biology, enabling the development of novel kinase inhibitors. Further improvements in GIST treatment may require targeting GIST stem cell populations and/or additional genomic events.