1
|
Zhang H, Yang X, Xie J, Cheng X, Chen J, Shen M, Ding W, Wang S, Zhang Z, Wang C, Zhao M. Clinicopathological and molecular analysis of microsatellite instability in prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study in China. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1277233. [PMID: 37901334 PMCID: PMC10613026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Microsatellite instability (MSI), or mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR), is rare in prostate cancers (PCas). The histological and molecular features of PCas with MSI/dMMR are incompletely described. Thus, we sought to identify the characteristics of PCas with MSI/dMMR. Methods and results We analyzed 1,141 primary treatment-naive PCas by MMR-related protein immunohistochemistry (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6). We identified eight cases exhibiting MSI/dMMR (0.7%, 8/1141). Of these, six tumors had both MSH2 and MSH6 protein loss, one had both MLH1 and PMS2 protein loss, and one had only MSH6 loss. Histologically, MSI/dMMR-PCas frequently demonstrated high histological grade (Grade Group 4 or 5), ductal/intraductal histology (6/8 cases), pleomorphic giant-cell features (4/8 cases), and conspicuous tumor lymphocytic infiltration (8/8 cases). Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of seven MSI/dMMR tumors revealed two MSI-H tumors with loss of both MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. Subsequently, the seven cases underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis with a highly validated targeted panel; four were MSI. All cases had a high tumor mutation burden (median: 45.3 mutations/Mb). Overall, the MSI/dMMR-PCas showed a high frequency of DNA damage-repair pathway gene changes, including five with pathogenic somatic or germline MMR gene mutations. Activating mutations in the MAPK pathway, PI3K pathway, and WNT/β-catenin pathway were common. TMPRSS2::ERG rearrangement was identified in one case (1/7, 14.3%). Conclusions Several pathological features are associated with MSI/dMMR in PCas. Identification of these features may help to select patients for genetic screening. As MSI/dMMR-PCas are enriched for actionable mutations, patients should be offered NGS to guide standard-of-care treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huizhi Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Xiaoqun Yang
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jialing Xie
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Miaomiao Shen
- Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenyi Ding
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Suying Wang
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| | - Chaofu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kobayashi H, Kosaka T, Nakamura K, Kimura T, Nishihara H, Oya M. Genomic analysis of aggressive ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Med 2022; 12:8445-8451. [PMID: 36573306 PMCID: PMC10134333 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic profile analysis using next-generation sequencing can potentially elucidate the pathogenesis of rare cancers. Ductal adenocarcinoma, a rare subtype of prostate cancer, has an aggressive nature. This is the first study to analyze the genomic profile of ductal adenocarcinoma in an Asian population. METHODS We identified 12 patients newly diagnosed with ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate at two hospitals, and nine patients (75.0%) had the pure type. Genomic assessment was performed using either the PleSSision testing platform or FoundationOne CDx. RESULTS At least one genomic alteration occurred in 11 patients (91.7%), and the most frequently mutated gene was tumor suppressor protein p53 (TP53), which was found in six cases (50.0%). Alterations characteristic of this cohort were found in four cases (33.3%) of retinoblastoma transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1), which was only observed in the pure type. Compared to previous study results, the frequency of genetic alterations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (n = 3; 25.0%) and Wnt-β-catenin pathway (n = 5; 41.7%) was comparable, but no alterations in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway were observed. None of the patients presented high tumor mutation burden or microsatellite instability. CONCLUSIONS We found that the Asian cohort with ductal adenocarcinoma had actionable alterations, and a high frequency of alterations in TP53 and RB1 reflected the aggressive nature of the tumor. Genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing is expected to help elucidate the pathogenesis of ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Department of Urology Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Kohei Nakamura
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Tokuhiro Kimura
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nishihara
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature. Curr Urol 2022; 16:218-226. [PMID: 36714233 PMCID: PMC9875213 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical features and outcomes after different therapeutic strategies for ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DPC), a rare but aggressive subtype of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) accounting for, in the pure and mixed form, 1% or less and 5% or less, respectively, of all the newly diagnosed PCa. Materials and methods Patients with a proven diagnosis of DPC undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination, were considered for this multicenter, retrospective study. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and age-related disease-specific survival. Results Eighty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria. Pure DPC was found in 29 patients (36%) and mixed ductal-acinar-PCa in 52 patients (64%). After a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 3-206 months), 3- and 5-year OS rates were 84% and 67%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 54% and 34%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or DFS between the pure and mixed DPC groups. Pure DPC was associated with a higher rate of metastatic disease at onset. Patients 74 years or younger had better disease-specific survival (p=0.0019). A subgroup analysis favored radiotherapy as the primary treatment for nonmetastatic, organ-confined DPC (3- and 5-year DFS of 80% and 50%, respectively, compared with 5-year DFS of 35% for surgical patients; p = 0.023). Conclusions Our study found DPC to be rarer, more aggressive, more likely to metastasize, and have a worse prognosis than the common acinar variant, especially in its pure form. Multicenter series are encouraged to obtain large data sets, or propensity score matching analyses with patients with conventional PCa are desirable to understand the best therapeutic approach and improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kench JG, Amin MB, Berney DM, Compérat EM, Cree IA, Gill AJ, Hartmann A, Menon S, Moch H, Netto GJ, Raspollini MR, Rubin MA, Tan PH, Tsuzuki T, Turjalic S, van der Kwast TH, Zhou M, Srigley JR. WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer. Histopathology 2022; 81:447-458. [PMID: 35758185 PMCID: PMC9542779 DOI: 10.1111/his.14711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some of the salient aspects include: (1) recognition that prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like carcinoma is not synonymous with a pattern of ductal carcinoma, but better classified as a subtype of acinar adenocarcinoma; (2) a specific section on treatment-related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma in view of the tight correlation between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology, and the emerging data on lineage plasticity; (3) a terminology change of basal cell carcinoma to "adenoid cystic (basal cell) cell carcinoma" given the presence of an underlying MYB::NFIB gene fusion in many cases; (4) discussion of the current issues in the grading of acinar adenocarcinoma and the prognostic significance of cribriform growth patterns; and (5) more detailed coverage of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) reflecting our increased knowledge of this entity, while recommending the descriptive term atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) for lesions falling short of IDC-P but containing more atypia than typically seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Lesions previously regarded as cribriform patterns of HGPIN are now included in the AIP category. This review discusses these developments, summarising the existing literature, as well as the emerging morphological and molecular data that underpins the classification and prognostication of prostatic carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G Kench
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW Health PathologyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- The University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mahul B Amin
- The University of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphisTNUSA
| | - Daniel M Berney
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Bartshealth NHS TrustRoyal London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Anthony J Gill
- The University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific HighwaySt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NürnbergErlangenGermany
| | - Santosh Menon
- Department of PathologyTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular PathologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - George J Netto
- Heersink School of MedicineThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamALUSA
| | - Maria R Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular DiagnosticsUniversity Hospital CareggiFlorenceItaly
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department for BioMedical ResearchUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Puay Hoon Tan
- Division of Pathology, Singapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical PathologyAichi Medical University HospitalNagakuteJapan
| | - Samra Turjalic
- Skin and Renal UnitsRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Cancer Dynamics LaboratoryThe Francis Crick InstituteLondonUK
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Ming Zhou
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineTufts Medical CenterBostonMAUSA
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Destouni M, Lazaris AC, Tzelepi V. Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133041. [PMID: 35804812 PMCID: PMC9264941 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary A cribriform structure is defined as a continuous proliferation of cells with intermingled lumina. Various entities may have a cribriform morphology within the prostate gland, ranging from normal, to benign, to borderline and even to malignant lesions. This review summarizes the morphologic features of entities that have a cribriform morphology within the prostate gland, with an emphasis on their differential diagnosis, molecular profile and clinical significance. The basic aim is to assist the pathologist with challenging and controversial cases and inform the clinician on the clinical implications of cribriform morphology. Abstract Cribriform glandular formations are characterized by a continuous proliferation of cells with intermingled lumina and can constitute a major or minor part of physiologic (normal central zone glands), benign (clear cell cribriform hyperplasia and basal cell hyperplasia), premalignant (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia), borderline (atypical intraductal cribriform proliferation) or clearly malignant (intraductal, acinar, ductal and basal cell carcinoma) lesions. Each displays a different clinical course and variability in clinical management and prognosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the morphological features, differential diagnosis, molecular profile and clinical significance of the cribriform-patterned entities of the prostate gland. Areas of controversy regarding their management, i.e., the grading of Intaductal Carcinoma, will also be discussed. Understanding the distinct nature of each cribriform lesion leads to the correct diagnosis and ensures accuracy in clinical decision-making, prognosis prediction and personalized risk stratification of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Destouni
- Department of Cytopathology, Hippokrateion General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Andreas C. Lazaris
- First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Vasiliki Tzelepi
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lindh C, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Bergström R, Chellappa V, Yaxley J, Lindberg J, Egevad L. Ductal and acinar components of mixed prostatic adenocarcinoma frequently have a common clonal origin. Prostate 2022; 82:576-583. [PMID: 35049068 PMCID: PMC9306900 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal adenocarcinoma (DA) is an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer. It is most commonly seen in mixed tumors together with conventional acinar adenocarcinoma (AA). The genetic profile of DA and its clonal origin is not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether DA represents a distinct genetic subtype and to investigate the somatic relationship between the ductal and acinar components of mixed cancers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In 17 radical prostatectomy specimens ductal and acinar tumor components from the same tumor foci were dissected. DNA was extracted and genomic sequencing performed. After exclusion of two cases with low cell yield, 15 paired samples remained for analysis. RESULTS In 12 of 15 cases a common somatic denominator was identified, while three cases had clonally separate components. In DA, TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions were detected in 47% (7/15), clonal FOXA1 alterations in 33% (5/15) and SPOP alterations in 27% (4/15) of cases. In one case KIAA1549-BRAF fusion was identified. Genome doubling events, resulting in an increased ploidy, were identified in the DA in 53% (8/15) of cases, but not seen in any AA. PTEN and CTNNB1 alterations were enriched in DA (6/15) but not seen in any AA. No cancers showed microsatellite instability or high tumor mutation burden. CONCLUSIONS Ductal and acinar prostate adenocarcinoma components of mixed tumors most often share the same origin and are clonally related. DA components in mixed tumor often exhibit genome doubling events resulting in aneuploidy, consistent with the aggressive nature of high grade prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes Lindh
- Department of Oncology‐PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | | | - Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Rebecka Bergström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Venkatesh Chellappa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - John Yaxley
- Wesley Urology ClinicBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology‐PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Considine B, Adeniran A, Hurwitz ME. Current Understanding and Management of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:110. [PMID: 34272624 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01090-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review will discuss current understanding and management approaches of Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P). IDC-P is a histological finding characterized by neoplastic cells that expand but do not invade prostate ducts. RECENT FINDINGS The presence of IDC-P on a prostate biopsy is almost always associated with an invasive disease component and is independently associated with worse clinical outcomes in both early and late disease. These tumors are enriched for mutations in homologous DNA recombination repair (HRR) leading to high genomic instability. Multiparametric MRI with targeted biopsy may aid in diagnosis. Given the poor clinical outcomes associated with this histologic entity, its presence in biopsies should warrant consideration of aggressive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryden Considine
- Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Adebowale Adeniran
- Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Michael E Hurwitz
- Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawrence MG, Porter LH, Clouston D, Murphy DG, Frydenberg M, Taylor RA, Risbridger GP. Knowing what's growing: Why ductal and intraductal prostate cancer matter. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/533/eaaz0152. [PMID: 32132214 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy, but only some tumors are lethal. Accurately identifying these tumors will improve clinical practice and instruct research. Aggressive cancers often have distinctive pathologies, including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and ductal adenocarcinoma. Here, we review the importance of these pathologies because they are often overlooked, especially in genomics and preclinical testing. Pathology, genomics, and patient-derived models show that IDC-P and ductal adenocarcinoma accompany multiple markers of poor prognosis. Consequently, "knowing what is growing" will help translate preclinical research to pinpoint and treat high-risk prostate cancer in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell G Lawrence
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Laura H Porter
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | | | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Department of Urology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia
| | - Renea A Taylor
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Gail P Risbridger
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. .,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ranasinghe W, Shapiro DD, Zhang M, Bathala T, Navone N, Thompson TC, Broom B, Aparicio A, Tu SM, Tang C, Davis JW, Pisters L, Chapin BF. Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:337-358. [PMID: 33824525 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00447-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is the most common variant histological subtype of prostate carcinoma and has an aggressive clinical course. DAC is usually characterized and treated as high-risk prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC). However, DAC has a different biology to that of acinar disease, which often poses a challenge for both diagnosis and management. DAC can be difficult to identify using conventional diagnostic modalities such as serum PSA levels and multiparametric MRI, and the optimal management for localized DAC is unknown owing to the rarity of the disease. Following definitive therapy for localized disease with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, the majority of DACs recur with visceral metastases at low PSA levels. Various systemic therapies that have been shown to be effective in high-risk PAC have limited use in treating DAC. Although current understanding of the biology of DAC is limited, genomic analyses have provided insights into the pathology behind its aggressive behaviour and potential future therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weranja Ranasinghe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Daniel D Shapiro
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tharakeswara Bathala
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nora Navone
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy C Thompson
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bradley Broom
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Louis Pisters
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian F Chapin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ranasinha N, Omer A, Philippou Y, Harriss E, Davies L, Chow K, Chetta PM, Erickson A, Rajakumar T, Mills IG, Bryant RJ, Hamdy FC, Murphy DG, Loda M, Hovens CM, Corcoran NM, Verrill C, Lamb AD. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, presentation, prognosis, and management. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 2:13-23. [PMID: 35474657 PMCID: PMC8988764 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is relatively rare, but is nonetheless the second most common subtype of prostate cancer. First described in 1967, opinion is still divided regarding its biology, prognosis, and outcome. Objectives To systematically interrogate the literature to clarify the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, progression, and survival statistics of DAC. Materials and methods We conducted a literature search of five medical databases from inception to May 04 2020 according to PRISMA criteria using search terms "prostate ductal adenocarcinoma" OR "endometriod adenocarcinoma of prostate" and variations of each. Results Some 114 studies were eligible for inclusion, presenting 2 907 170 prostate cancer cases, of which 5911 were DAC. [Correction added on 16 January 2021 after the first online publication: the preceding statement has been corrected in this current version.] DAC accounts for 0.17% of prostate cancer on meta-analysis (range 0.0837%-13.4%). The majority of DAC cases were admixed with predominant acinar adenocarcinoma (AAC). Median Prostate Specific Antigen at diagnosis ranged from 4.2 to 9.6 ng/mL in the case series.DAC was more likely to present as T3 (RR1.71; 95%CI 1.53-1.91) and T4 (RR7.56; 95%CI 5.19-11.01) stages, with far higher likelihood of metastatic disease (RR4.62; 95%CI 3.84-5.56; all P-values < .0001), compared to AAC. Common first treatments included surgery (radical prostatectomy (RP) or cystoprostatectomy for select cases) or radiotherapy (RT) for localized disease, and hormonal or chemo-therapy for metastatic disease. Few studies compared RP and RT modalities, and those that did present mixed findings, although cancer-specific survival rates seem worse after RP.Biochemical recurrence rates were increased with DAC compared to AAC. Additionally, DAC metastasized to unusual sites, including penile and peritoneal metastases. Where compared, all studies reported worse survival for DAC compared to AAC. Conclusion When drawing conclusions about DAC it is important to note the heterogenous nature of the data. DAC is often diagnosed incidentally post-treatment, perhaps due to lack of a single, universally applied histopathological definition. As such, DAC is likely underreported in clinical practice and the literature. Poorer prognosis and outcomes for DAC compared to AAC merit further research into genetic composition, evolution, diagnosis, and treatment of this surprisingly common prostate cancer sub-type. Patient summary Ductal prostate cancer is a rare but important form of prostate cancer. This review demonstrates that it tends to be more serious at detection and more likely to spread to unusual parts of the body. Overall survival is worse with this type of prostate cancer and urologists need to be aware of the presence of ductal prostate cancer to alter management decisions and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithesh Ranasinha
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Roosevelt DriveOxfordUK
| | - Altan Omer
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Yiannis Philippou
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Eli Harriss
- Bodleian Health Care LibrariesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Lucy Davies
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Ken Chow
- Department of SurgeryRoyal Melbourne HospitalUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | | | - Andrew Erickson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Timothy Rajakumar
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Ian G. Mills
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Richard J. Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Roosevelt DriveOxfordUK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Roosevelt DriveOxfordUK
| | - Declan G. Murphy
- Division of Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVICAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVICAustralia
| | - Massimo Loda
- Dana Farber Cancer InstituteHarvardMAUSA
- Weill Cornell Medical SchoolNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Christopher M. Hovens
- Department of SurgeryRoyal Melbourne HospitalUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of SurgeryRoyal Melbourne HospitalUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Alastair D. Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Roosevelt DriveOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Enke CA, Farrington TA, Higano CS, Horwitz EM, Hurwitz M, Ippolito JE, Kane CJ, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Pugh TJ, Richey S, Roach M, Rosenfeld S, Schaeffer E, Shabsigh A, Small EJ, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 17:479-505. [PMID: 31085757 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 814] [Impact Index Per Article: 203.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and workup, treatment options for localized disease, and management of recurrent and advanced disease for clinicians who treat patients with prostate cancer. The portions of the guidelines included herein focus on the roles of germline and somatic genetic testing, risk stratification with nomograms and tumor multigene molecular testing, androgen deprivation therapy, secondary hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Jesse McKenney
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - George Netto
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Richey
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | - Mack Roach
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Edward Schaeffer
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Ahmad Shabsigh
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Eric J Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Jonathan Tward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes recent advances in prostate cancer (PCa) genetics. RECENT FINDINGS Upwards of 20% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate tumors (mCRPC) carry homologous recombination (HR) repair gene mutations, of which ~ 10% are germline (inherited). Another ~ 5% exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Pembrolizumab is approved for tumors with MMRd, thus patients with mCRPC and MMRd are candidates for pembrolizumab. Emerging data indicate that platinum chemotherapy and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in PCa exhibiting HR deficiency. NCCN guidelines now recommend germline and somatic tumor testing in specific clinical scenarios due to treatment and family implications. Genetic testing in PCa patients may inform prognosis, treatment options, and have implications for family counseling. PARPi, platinum chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are promising targeted therapies for PCa with specific molecular features. Therapeutic advances, along with importance to relatives, are driving genetic testing in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra O Sokolova
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, USA.
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iakymenko OA, Lugo I, Kwon D, Zhao W, Hayee A, Punnen S, Parekh DJ, Pollack A, Ritch CR, Gonzalgo ML, Stoyanova R, Jorda M, Kryvenko ON. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Cancer Grade and Tumor Volume Does Not Have an Independent Effect on Adverse Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes Compared to Usual Acinar Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Urology 2019; 137:108-114. [PMID: 31711982 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study if prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) controlled by Grade Group (GG), PSA, and tumor volume (TV) is an independent predictor of adverse radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes. MATERIALS One-hundred and twenty-eight PDA and 1141 acinar continuous RPs were studied. Each tumor nodule (TN) was individually graded, staged, and its TV measured. Univariate analysis (UVA) identified features associated with lymph node metastasis (LN+), extraprostatic extension (EPE), positive surgical margins (SM+), and seminal vesicle invasion (SV+). We then assessed PDA effect on RP outcomes in a multivariate analysis (MVA). RESULTS In 127 cases PDA was present in 1 TN and no TN was pure PDA. One-hundred and twenty-three cases had PDA in TNs with highest grade, stage, and TV. Patients with PDA were older (65 vs 63 years, P < 0.001), had higher GG (P < 0.001), and LN+ (6.3% vs 2.7%, P = 0.049). Controlling these variables by GG eliminated statistical significance. Overall, there were 3249 separate TNs (129 PDA and 3120 acinar). In UVA, PDA predicted EPE (92/124 vs 517/3045), SV+ (28/1129 vs 116/3,120), and SM+ (51/129 vs 296/3120), all P < 0.001. In MVA, PDA lost its effect on EPE (OR = 0.88, P = 0.64), SM+ (OR = 0.86, P = 0.5), and SV+ (OR = 0.99, P = 0.98). CONCLUSION Controlled for grade and TV, PDA was not an independent predictor of adverse RP outcomes, but former 2 were. Hence, higher GG and TV associated with PDA TNs may be predictive of adverse RP outcomes rather than PDA by itself. These conclusions may be used in preoperative risk stratification and definitive therapy planning when PDA is identified on needle biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleksii A Iakymenko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Isabella Lugo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Wei Zhao
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Amin Hayee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Chad R Ritch
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Merce Jorda
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications. MEDICINES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 6:E82. [PMID: 31366128 PMCID: PMC6789661 DOI: 10.3390/medicines6030082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequent nonskin cancer and second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in man. Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease with many patients exhibiting an aggressive disease with progression, metastasis, and other patients showing an indolent disease with low tendency to progression. Three stages of development of human prostate tumors have been identified: intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma androgen-dependent, and adenocarcinoma androgen-independent or castration-resistant. Advances in molecular technologies have provided a very rapid progress in our understanding of the genomic events responsible for the initial development and progression of prostate cancer. These studies have shown that prostate cancer genome displays a relatively low mutation rate compared with other cancers and few chromosomal loss or gains. The ensemble of these molecular studies has led to suggest the existence of two main molecular groups of prostate cancers: one characterized by the presence of ERG rearrangements (~50% of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions involving ETS transcription factors, fusing the 5' untranslated region of the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 to nearly the coding sequence of the ETS family transcription factor ERG) and features of chemoplexy (complex gene rearrangements developing from a coordinated and simultaneous molecular event), and a second one characterized by the absence of ERG rearrangements and by the frequent mutations in the E3 ubiquitin ligase adapter SPOP and/or deletion of CDH1, a chromatin remodeling factor, and interchromosomal rearrangements and SPOP mutations are early events during prostate cancer development. During disease progression, genomic and epigenomic abnormalities accrued and converged on prostate cancer pathways, leading to a highly heterogeneous transcriptomic landscape, characterized by a hyperactive androgen receptor signaling axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Testa
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Vaile Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Germana Castelli
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Vaile Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Elvira Pelosi
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Vaile Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lindh C, Kis L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Yaxley J, Wiklund NP, Clements M, Egevad L. PD-L1 expression and deficient mismatch repair in ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. APMIS 2019; 127:554-560. [PMID: 31127651 DOI: 10.1111/apm.12970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. A tissue microarray of 32 ductal and 42 grade-matched acinar adenocarcinomas was used. Slides were stained for PD-L1, PD-L2, MMR proteins, CD4 and CD8. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was only seen in 3% (1/34) of ductal and 5% (2/42) of acinar adenocarcinomas (p = 1.0), while PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells was seen in 29% (10/34) of ductal and 14% (6/42) of acinar adenocarcinomas (p = 0.16). dMMR, as defined by loss of one or more of the MMR proteins, was identified in 5% (4/73) of cases, including 1 ductal and 3 acinar adenocarcinomas. There was a suggested association between infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes and ductal subtype (p = 0.04) but not between CD4+ lymphocytes and tumor type (p = 0.28). The study shows that both dMMR and PD-L1 expression is uncommon in tumor cells of both ductal and acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate, while PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells is a more common finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes Lindh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lorand Kis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nils Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (MMK), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Androgen-Receptor-Negative Canine Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20071555. [PMID: 30925701 PMCID: PMC6480132 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20071555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Canine carcinomas have been considered natural models for human diseases; however, the genomic profile of canine prostate cancers (PCs) has not been explored. In this study, 14 PC androgen-receptor-negative cases, 4 proliferative inflammatory atrophies (PIA), and 5 normal prostate tissues were investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Copy number alterations (CNAs) were assessed using the Canine Genome CGH Microarray 4 × 44K (Agilent Technologies). Genes covered by recurrent CNAs were submitted to enrichment and cross-validation analysis. In addition, the expression levels of TP53, MDM2 and ZBTB4 were evaluated in an independent set of cases by qPCR. PC cases presented genomic complexity, while PIA samples had a small number of CNAs. Recurrent losses covering well-known tumor suppressor genes, such as ATM, BRCA1, CDH1, MEN1 and TP53, were found in PC. The in silico functional analysis showed several cancer-related genes associated with canonical pathways and interaction networks previously described in human PC. The MDM2, TP53, and ZBTB4 copy number alterations were translated into altered expression levels. A cross-validation analysis using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for human PC uncovered similarities between canine and human PCs. Androgen-receptor-negative canine PC is a complex disease characterized by high genomic instability, showing a set of genes with similar alterations to human cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Inamura K. Prostatic cancers: understanding their molecular pathology and the 2016 WHO classification. Oncotarget 2018; 9:14723-14737. [PMID: 29581876 PMCID: PMC5865702 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that prostatic cancers represent a group of histologically and molecularly heterogeneous diseases with variable clinical courses. In accordance with the increased knowledge of their clinicopathologies and genetics, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of prostatic cancers has been revised. Additionally, recent data on their comprehensive molecular characterization have increased our understanding of the genomic basis of prostatic cancers and enabled us to classify them into subtypes with distinct molecular pathologies and clinical features. Our increased understanding of the molecular pathologies of prostatic cancers has permitted their evolution from a poorly understood, heterogeneous group of diseases with variable clinical courses to characteristic molecular subtypes that allow the implementation of personalized therapies and better patient management. This review provides perspectives on the new 2016 WHO classification of prostatic cancers as well as recent knowledge of their molecular pathologies. The WHO classification of prostatic cancers will require additional revisions to allow for reliable and clinically meaningful cancer diagnoses as a better understanding of their molecular characteristics is obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Inamura
- Division of Pathology, The Cancer Institute; Department of Pathology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhou M. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PIN-like carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:S71-79. [PMID: 29297491 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Many prostate lesions have 'large gland' morphology with gland size similar to or larger than benign glands, complex glandular architecture including papillary, cribriform, and solid, and significant cytological atypia in glandular epithelium with nucleomegaly, prominent nucleoli, or anisonucleosis. The most common and clinically important lesions with 'large gland' morphology include high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), PIN-like carcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma, and intraductal carcinoma. These lesions have diverse clinical significance and management implications. HGPIN refers to proliferation of glandular epithelium that displays severe cytological atypia within the confines of prostatic ducts and acini. A HGPIN diagnosis in biopsies connotes ~25% risk of detection of cancer in repeat biopsies. It has been accepted as the main precursor lesion to invasive carcinoma. PIN-like carcinoma is a variant of acinar carcinoma that is morphologically reminiscent of HGPIN and is composed of large cancer glands lined with pseudostratified epithelium. Its clinical outcome is similar to that of usual acinar carcinomas and is graded as Gleason score 3+3=6. Ductal adenocarcinoma comprises large glands lined with tall columnar and pseudostratified epithelium. It is more aggressive than acinar carcinomas and is associated with higher stage disease and greater risk of PSA recurrence and mortality. Intraductal carcinoma is an intraglandular/ductal neoplastic proliferation of glandular epithelial cells that results in marked expansion of glandular architecture and nuclear atypia that often exceeds that in invasive carcinomas. In majority of cases, it is thought to represent retrograde extension of invasive carcinoma into pre-existing ducts and acini. Rarely it may represent a peculiar form of carcinoma with predilection for intraductal location. It is considered an adverse pathological feature and is seen almost always in high-grade and volume carcinoma and harbingers worse clinical outcomes. This article reviews 'new' information on the clinical and pathological features of HGPIN, PIN-like carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and intraductal carcinoma, and focuses morphological features that aid the differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhou
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|