A combination of GATA3 and SOX10 is useful for the diagnosis of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Breast Carcinoma With Tubulopapillary Features Has a Distinct Immunophenotypic and Molecular Signature: A Report of Two Tumors and Literature Review

Breast carcinoma with tubulopapillary features is a newly described entity associated with poor prognosis with only 14 tumors reported in the literature. We report 2 additional tumors and identify novel immunohistochemical and molecular features of the tumor. The first tumor was from a 72-year-old woman with nonmetastatic breast carcinoma and the second was from a 32-year-old woman with metastatic breast carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy. Both tumors had high-grade nuclear features with a distinctive morphology characterized by infiltrating open glands with intratubular papillary and micropapillary projections in >90% of the invasive carcinoma. In addition to the usual predictors of aggressive behavior, both tumors showed a high expression of p16 and SOX10, which has not been previously described. Targeted tumor sequencing revealed pathogenic variants of TP53 in both tumors, in agreement with previous reports. Prior studies have shown a correlation between p16 and SOX10 expression with high-grade features and worse prognosis; typically seen in triple-negative carcinomas as demonstrated in both of our tumors. However, not all reported tumors of breast carcinoma with tubulopapillary features have demonstrated a triple-negative profile as there are a few reports of tumors with estrogen receptor and/or human epidermal growth factor 2 expression. Due to their distinct morphologic and molecular characteristics, breast carcinoma with tubulopapillary features may represent a new breast cancer histologic subtype.

Diagnostic utility and sensitivities of matrix Gla protein (MGP), TRPS1 and GATA3 in breast cancer: focusing on metastatic breast cancer, invasive breast carcinoma with special features, and salivary gland-type tumours

Matrix Gla protein (MGP) and trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) have recently emerged as novel breast-specific immunohistochemical (IHC) markers, particularly for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metaplastic carcinoma. The present study aimed to validate and compare the expression of MGP, TRPS1 and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) in metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC), invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) with special features, including special types of invasive breast carcinoma (IBC-STs) and invasive breast carcinoma of no special type with unique features, and mammary and non-mammary salivary gland-type tumours (SGTs). Among all enrolled cases, MGP, TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable high positivity for ER/PR-positive (p=0.148) and HER2-positive (p=0.310) breast carcinoma (BC), while GATA3 positivity was significantly lower in TNBC (p<0.001). Similarly, the positive rates of MGP and TRPS1 in MBCs (99.4%), were higher than in GATA3 (90.9%, p<0.001). Among the IBC-STs, 98.4% of invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) were positive for all three markers. Among neuroendocrine tumours (NTs), all cases were positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, while MGP positivity was relatively low (81.8%, p=0.313). In the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NC) subgroup, all cases were positive for GATA3 and MGP, while one case was negative for TRPS1. All carcinomas with apocrine differentiation (APOs) were positive for GATA3 and MGP, while only 60% of the cases demonstrated moderate staining for TRPS1. Among mammary SGTs, MGP demonstrated the highest positivity (100%), followed by TRPS1 (96.0%) and GATA3 (72.0%). Positive staining for these markers was also frequently observed in non-mammary SGTs. Our findings further validate the high sensitivity of MGP and TRPS1 in MBCs, IBC-STs, and breast SGTs. However, none of these markers are capable of distinguishing between mammary and non-mammary SGTs.

Frequency of Androgen Receptor Positivity in Tumors: A Study Evaluating More Than 18,000 Tumors

Androgen receptor (AR) is a transcription factor expressed in various normal tissues and is a therapeutic target for prostate and possibly other cancers. A TMA containing 18,234 samples from 141 different tumor types/subtypes and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. AR positivity was found in 116 tumor types including 66 tumor types (46.8%) with ≥1 strongly positive tumor. Moderate/strong AR positivity was detected in testicular sex cord-stromal tumors (93.3-100%) and neoplasms of the prostate (79.3-98.7%), breast (25.0-75.5%), other gynecological tumors (0.9-100%), kidney (5.0-44.1%), and urinary bladder (5.4-24.2%). Low AR staining was associated with advanced tumor stage (pTa versus pT2-4; p < 0.0001) in urothelial carcinoma; advanced pT (p < 0.0001), high tumor grade (p < 0.0001), nodal metastasis (p < 0.0001), and reduced survival (p = 0.0024) in invasive breast carcinoma; high pT (p < 0.0001) and grade (p < 0.0001) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC); and high pT (p = 0.0055) as well as high grade (p < 0.05) in papillary RCC. AR staining was unrelated to histopathological/clinical features in 157 endometrial carcinomas and in 221 ovarian carcinomas. Our data suggest a limited role of AR immunohistochemistry for tumor distinction and a prognostic role in breast and clear cell RCC and highlight tumor entities that might benefit from AR-targeted therapy.

Pitfalls in Respiratory Tract Cytopathology

BACKGROUND

Cytopathology is integral to the investigation and diagnosis of respiratory disease, and, in the last decade or so, transbronchial needle aspiration by endobronchial ultrasound has made possible diagnosis and staging of malignant thoracic tumours at a single procedure. In addition, interventional teams increasingly include cytopathologists and cytotechnologists who, by providing rapid onsite evaluation, ensure efficient sampling of intrathoracic targets with the ultimate goal of accurate diagnosis as well as sufficient material for comprehensive predictive testing. Nonetheless, "traditional" cytological investigations such as bronchial washings, brushings, and lavages are still carried out for investigation of both suspected neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions, and all these procedures still produce specimens in which florid benign cells mimic malignancy, while truly neoplastic cells lurk quietly in the background. Furthermore, even when neoplasia is not suspected, issues in preparation and interpretation may render a final assessment inaccurate and, therefore, clinically unhelpful or misleading. In this overview, we have tried to adopt a format partly modelled on the passage of a specimen from clinical acquisition to laboratory endpoint, thus taking in potential pitfalls in communication, clinical interaction, transport, and clinic-based preparation, as well as in morphology, immunocytochemistry, and suitability for predictive testing. It is not exhaustive but highlights areas that may frequently be encountered or are part of our personal experience.

SUMMARY

The account highlights potential pitfalls in respiratory cytopathology at key stages of the process from acquisition to reporting and presents these in both flow diagram and tabular form. We hope this is useful for the increasingly collaborative roles of cytotechnologist and cytopathologist and their wider involvement in the clinical investigative teams.

KEY MESSAGES

Correct clinical and radiological information is crucially important and promotes the correct acquisition and processing of cytopathological specimens. Cross-discipline collaborative working ensures the most efficient use of the specimen such that diagnoses and predictive tests are performed on optimal material, reducing the potential for misinterpretation. Nonetheless, even with optimal material, morphological mimics and atypical antigen expression may mislead and render accurate diagnosis challenging.

TRPS1 is a promising marker for all subtypes of breast cancer

AIMS

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome-1 (TRPS1) has been proposed as a novel breast marker with equally high expression in breast cancer (BC) subtypes, making it a useful diagnostic tool. Here, its expression was evaluated alongside other commonly used markers [GATA3, GCDFP15, mammaglobin (MGB) and SOX10] in a large cohort of BCs (n = 1852) and their corresponding nodal metastases. Its usefulness as a diagnostic tool and its correlation with clinicopathological features were assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TRPS1 was expressed at 75.8% overall in the BC cohort, with at least 58% expression among BC subtypes. It was less sensitive than GATA3 for luminal and HER2-overexpressing (HER2-OE) cancers (luminal A: 82 versus 97%; luminal B: 80 versus 95%; HER2-OE: 62 versus 76%), but it was the most sensitive for TNBC (60 versus ≤ 41%). It showed a stable expression in nodal metastases (primary tumour 76 versus nodal metastasis 78%), unlike a reduced nodal expression for GATA3 (86 versus 77%). TRPS1 outperformed GATA3 in detecting non-luminal cancers when paired with other breast markers. TRPS1 and GCDFP15 was the most sensitive combination in TNBC detection, with a 76% detection rate. For TRPS1-negative and GCDFP15-negative TNBCs, SOX10 was more sensitive than GATA3 (29 versus 24%).

CONCLUSIONS

TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for all breast cancer subtypes, outperforming GATA3 in non-luminal cancers and displaying the highest sensitivity for TNBC detection when combined with GCDFP15. It is a valuable addition to the breast marker panel for accurate identification of BC.

Role of SOX10 Immunohistochemical Expression in Diagnosing Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Its Correlation With Clinicopathological Features

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a diagnostic challenge for histopathologists due to the reduced frequency of breast-specific markers. SOX10 has emerged as a useful diagnostic marker for TNBC. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of SOX-10 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression in our cohort and assess its correlation with clinicopathological and histological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 72 primary TNBC cases. Specimens included tru-cut biopsies and excision specimens. We stained whole slide sections of these specimens with SOX10 antibody and calculated its frequency (%) of expression and H-score. We applied the chi-square test to assess the correlation between SOX10 expression and clinicopathological and histological features such as the patient's age, specimen type, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic count, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), necrosis, calcification, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node involvement, T stage, and N stage.

RESULTS

SOX10 expression was observed in 42 (58.3%) cases with a median H-score of 57.5. The expression was significantly higher in tru-cut biopsy specimens as compared to excision specimens (73.5 vs 41.7%) and TILs negative tumors as compared to TILs positive tumors (64.3% vs 27.3). Metaplastic carcinoma showed reduced expression when compared with non-metaplastic tumors (35.7% vs 63.8%), but statistical significance was not achieved. No correlation was observed with the patient's age, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic count, necrosis, calcification, LVI, lymph node involvement, T stage, and N stage.

CONCLUSION

SOX10 was expressed in more than half of the TNBC cases of our study which not only highlights its diagnostic utility but advocated its application in combination with other breast-specific markers. The expression didn't correlate with the majority of clinicopathological and histological features, but correlation with tru-cut biopsy specimens and absence of TILs draws attention towards possible roles of proper fixation and host immunity, respectively.

Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Introduction. Triple negative breast carcinomas are characterized by a lack of hormone receptor and HER2 expression and inconsistent expression of breast-specific immunohistochemical markers. The expression of many site-specific markers in these tumors is largely unknown. The objective of the study was to examine the expression of widely used immunohistochemical markers on a large cohort of triple negative breast cancer. Methods. Sections from tissue microarrays were stained with 47 markers using routine protocols. Most markers were scored using a modified Allred method. ATRX, BAP1, SMAD4, e-cadherin, and beta-catenin were scored as retained or lost. Mammaglobin was considered positive if there was at least moderate intensity staining in any tumor cells. P16 was scored as overexpressed or not overexpressed; p53 was scored as wildtype, overexpressed, null, or cytoplasmic. Results. The cohort consisted of 639 tumors including 601 primary and 32 metastases. Overall, 96% expressed GATA3, mammaglobin, and/or SOX10 while 97% of no special type tumors expressed this panel. Carcinoma of apocrine differentiation demonstrated an AR positive, SOX10 negative, K5 negative/focal immunophenotype. PAX8 (SP348), WT1, Napsin A, and TTF1 (8G7G3/1) were never or rarely expressed while CA9, CDX2, NKX3.1, SATB2 (SATBA410), synaptophysin, and vimentin were variably expressed. Conclusions. Almost all TNBC express at least 1 of the 3 IHC markers: GATA3, mammaglobin, and/or SOX10. Carcinoma of apocrine differentiation is characterized by an AR positive, SOX10 negative, K5 negative or focal immunophenotype. Cautious interpretation of so-called site-specific markers, with knowledge of antibody clones, is required in excluding the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer.

Potential biomarkers in breast cancer drug development: application of the biomarker qualification evidentiary framework

Breast cancer treatments have evolved rapidly, and clinically meaningful biomarkers have been used to guide therapy. These biomarkers hold utility within the drug development process to increase the efficiency and effectiveness. To this purpose, the US FDA developed an evidentiary framework. Literature searches conducted of literature published between 2016 and 2022 identified biomarkers in breast cancer. These biomarkers were reviewed for drug development utility through the biomarker qualification evidentiary framework. In the breast cancer setting, several promising biomarkers (ctDNA, Ki-67 and PIK3CA) were identified. There is a need for increased transparency regarding the requirements for qualification of specific biomarkers and increased awareness of the processes involved in biomarker qualification.

SOX10 promotes the malignant biological behavior of basal-like breast cancer cells by regulating EMT process

Background

The diagnostic utility of SRY-box transcription factor 10 (SOX10) expression in basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) has been reported previously. However, the effect of SOX10 on the malignancy of BLBC cells and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unelucidated. Here, we investigate the regulatory mechanisms and roles of SOX10 in BLBC progression.

Methods

Sequencing data from patients with BLBC were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas database to determine the transcriptomic levels of SOX10 across breast cancer subtypes. Subsequently, the bioinformatics relevance of SOX10 in BLBC was investigated. Immunohistochemical assays were used to corroborate the protein expression of SOX10 in clinicopathological specimens (human breast cancer paraffin tissues). RNA interference was used to downregulate SOX10 expression, and the efficiency of interference was evaluated using quantitative PCR. The expression levels of molecules related to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway were determined by western blotting. Various assays, such as transwell, colony formation, and flow apoptosis assays, were conducted to assess the malignancy of BLBC cells (MDA-MB-231).

Results

Bioinformatics analyses revealed the differential expression of SOX10 in various breast cancer subtypes. An association between SOX10 and immune checkpoint expression was observed in BLBC. Additionally, immune correlation analysis indicated a positive relationship between SOX10 expression and effector immune cells. SOX10 was identified as a potential immunotherapeutic target. Juxtaposed with non-basal-like breast cancer (N-BLBC) and breast adenosis, immunohistochemical analysis revealed the upregulated expression of SOX10 in BLBC, indicating its potential diagnostic significance. Single-gene functional enrichment analysis indicated that SOX10 is associated with EMT and the tumor inflammatory index. Experimental outcomes from cellular assays suggested that the downregulation of SOX10 inhibited multiple malignancy-associated behaviors in MDA-MB-231 cells, specifically affecting the EMT process, migration, invasion, proliferation, clone formation, and anti-apoptotic activities.

Conclusions

We concluded that SOX10 contributes to the malignancy of BLBC cells by modulating the EMT pathway. Moreover, we observed a notable correlation between SOX10 expression and immune responses, indicating the potential significance of SOX10 in immunotherapy.

Comparative expression of TRPS1, GATA3, SOX10, mammaglobin, and GCDFP-15 in effusion specimens with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) for breast carcinomas has shown low detection rates of metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in effusions. Although GATA3 has enhanced diagnostic accuracy in this realm, its limited utility in detecting triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) has been highlighted. TRPS1 has been introduced as a potentially sensitive and specific marker in detecting MBC on histologic samples. We investigate the utility of TRPS1 as a marker for MBC in effusion specimens and compare its performance to SOX10, GATA3, mammaglobin (MG), and GCDFP-15.

METHODS

A database search identified malignant effusions involved by MBC between 2013 and 2021. Cases from unique patients with sufficient cellularity were evaluated for TRPS1, GATA3, SOX10, MG, and GCDFP-15 IHC. The intensity and extent of tumor cells (TC) were scored by two pathologists. Any discrepancies were jointly reviewed for consensus.

RESULTS

GATA3 showed the highest rate of positivity (98.2%), followed by TRPS1 (89.5%), MG (43.9%), GCDFP-15 (21.1%), and SOX10 (3.5%). All GATA3-positive cases showed intermediate to high expression. Comparatively, TRPS1 showed more variability in staining extent and intensity. In 13 (22.8%) cases, TRPS1 showed extensive background staining of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Of six TNBCs, GATA3, and TRPS1 were positive in six (100%) and four (66.7%) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While TRPS1 shows a lower detection rate for MBC than GATA-3, using a combination of these markers can enhance effusion cytology's performance in detecting MBC. However, variability in TRPS1 staining intensity and high background TRPS1 staining of inflammatory and mesothelial cells can increase difficulty in its evaluation.

Role of intraoperative touch imprint cytology and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of metastatic malignancies in the central nervous system: Cyto-histomorphological findings and differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) are intracranial neoplasms that are more common in adults than primary brain tumors, causing significant mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the definitive histopathological diagnosis using touch imprint cytology and the importance and use of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of primary origin.

METHOD

Cytological, paraffin section, and immunohistochemical study slides of all metastatic brain tumors consecutively consulted at the pathology department between 2018 and 2023 were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of patients' diagnostic results who underwent imprint cytology were compared based on the final diagnosis histopathological report.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with and without intraoperative consultation were included in the study. The definitive histopathologic diagnosis and the diagnostic accuracy rate of imprint cytology for distinguishing glial and metastatic tumors on paraffin sections was 100%. Immunohistochemistry was performed in all patients (except one patient; immediate exitus) and histological classification of the primary tumor was performed by analysis of clinical findings and biomarkers. The primary origins of metastatic tumors were often lung and breast, with adenocarcinoma subtype histomorphology, cerebral hemispheres, and discrete foci of metastasis.

CONCLUSION

TPs is a simple and rapid technique that supports diagnosis in intraoperative neuropathology and is a very cost-effective procedure. The pathologist's experience is the key factor in the diagnosis and reduces the need for a frozen section. In our series, the final histopathologic correlation of imprint cytology in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors is 100%.

Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis and Classification of Breast Tumors

CONTEXT.—

In the clinical practice of breast pathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of different markers is widely used for the diagnosis and classification of breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of currently used and recently identified IHC stains that have been implemented in the field of diagnostic breast pathology.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from literature review and clinical experience of the authors as breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In the current review, we summarize the common uses of IHC stains for diagnosing different types of breast lesions, especially invasive and noninvasive breast lesions, and benign and malignant spindle cell lesions. In addition, the cutting-edge knowledge of diagnostic carcinoma markers will lead us to further understand the different types of breast carcinoma and differentiate breast carcinomas from other carcinomas of similar morphology. Knowing the strengths and limitations of these markers is essential to the clinical practice of breast pathology.

Diagnostic Pitfalls in Breast Cancer Pathology With an Emphasis on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens

CONTEXT.—

Breast pathology has many mimics and diagnostic pitfalls. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions, particularly in the biopsy setting, can be especially challenging, with diagnostic errors having significant management implications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the pitfalls encountered when evaluating ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, providing histologic clues and guidance for appropriate use and interpretation of immunohistochemistry to aid in the correct diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from review of pertinent literature of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas and from the experience of the authors as practicing breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Awareness of the pitfalls in diagnosing breast cancers is important when creating a differential diagnosis for each breast lesion evaluated. This review will cover some of these scenarios to aid in the diagnostic process.

Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinomas: Toward a Unified Group With Shared Molecular Features and Clinical Behavior

Triple-negative apocrine carcinomas (TNACs) are rare breast tumors with limited studies evaluating their molecular characteristics and clinical behavior. We performed a histologic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and clinicopathologic assessment of 42 invasive TNACs (1 with a focal spindle cell component) from 41 patients, 2 pure apocrine ductal carcinomas in situ (A-DCIS), and 1 A-DCIS associated with spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (SCMBC). All TNACs had characteristic apocrine morphology and expressed androgen receptor (42/42), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (24/24), and CK5/6 (16/16). GATA3 was positive in most cases (16/18, 89%), and SOX10 was negative (0/22). TRPS1 was weakly expressed in a minority of tumors (3/14, 21%). Most TNACs had low Ki67 proliferation (≤10% in 67%, 26/39), with a median index of 10%. Levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were low (≤10% in 93%, 39/42, and 15% in 7%, 3/42). Eighteen percent of TNACs presented with axillary nodal metastasis (7/38). No patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved pathologic complete response (0%, 0/10). Nearly all patients with TNAC (97%, n = 32) were without evidence of disease at the time of study (mean follow-up of 62 months). Seventeen invasive TNACs and 10 A-DCIS (7 with paired invasive TNAC) were profiled by targeted capture-based next-generation DNA sequencing. Pathogenic mutations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway genes PIK3CA (53%) and/or PIK3R1 (53%) were identified in all TNACs (100%), including 4 (24%) with comutated PTEN. Ras-MAPK pathway genes, including NF1 (24%), and TP53 were mutated in 6 tumors each (35%). All A-DCIS shared mutations, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase aberrations and copy number alterations with paired invasive TNACs or SCMBC, and a subset of invasive carcinomas showed additional mutations in tumor suppressors (NF1, TP53, ARID2, and CDKN2A). Divergent genetic profiles between A-DCIS and invasive carcinoma were identified in 1 case. In summary, our findings support TNAC as a morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically homogeneous subgroup of triple-negative breast carcinomas and suggest overall favorable clinical behavior.

Marker assessments in ER-positive breast cancers: old markers, new applications?

Evaluation of oestrogen receptor (ER) expression by immunostaining is essential in the pathological assessment of breast cancer. Its expression is intercorrelated with clinicopathological features, molecular typing, and treatment selection. The development of novel therapeutic agents related to ER status, the recent ASCO introduction of an ER-low positive category of breast cancers, and the ever-increasing plethora of diagnostic and theragnostic markers call for a timely update. In this article we aim to review the clinicopathological features of ER-positive breast cancers, with an emphasis on ER-low positive breast cancers, and a focus on updating the (i) assessment, reporting and interpretation of ER immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, (ii) correlations of ER status with other diagnostic and theragnostic markers, and (iii) implications for treatment selection and response. In the face of the developments in IHC and molecular techniques and targeted therapy, ER immunostaining is still expected to remain as the core component of prognostic and theragnostic assessment of breast cancers.

Wnt Family Member 9b (Wnt9b) Is a Sensitive and Specific Marker for Triple-negative Breast Carcinoma Including Metaplastic Carcinoma

Wnt9b was recently identified as a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinomas. Due to the limited number of triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs) in previous study, we further explored Wnt9b's utility in breast carcinoma, especially in TNBCs including metaplastic carcinomas. We systematically evaluated Wnt9b expression on tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 413 breast carcinomas, 208 urothelial carcinomas, 102 endometrial carcinomas, 109 cholangiocarcinomas, 192 ovarian carcinomas, 48 lung adenocarcinomas, 69 colorectal adenocarcinomas, and 78 melanomas, and whole tissue section (WTS) from 20 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, 34 nonmetaplastic TNBCs, and 67 invasive metaplastic carcinomas. The results showed Wnt9b was highly expressed in breast carcinomas (91% on TMA and 98% on WTS) and in nonmetaplastic TNBCs (91% on TMA and 97% on WTS), but almost completely negative in other tested tumor types. Wnt9b was also highly expressed in metaplastic carcinomas (80%), significantly higher than GATA3 (56%) and SOX10 (48%), but slightly lower than TRPS1 (90%). In summary, our results demonstrate that Wnt9b is a highly sensitive marker for breast carcinomas, including TNBCs and metaplastic carcinomas. Further, we compared its utility with other breast markers including TRPS1, GATA3, and SOX10 in metaplastic carcinomas.

Pitfalls in breast pathology

Accurate pathological diagnosis is the cornerstone of optimal clinical management for patients with breast disease. As non-operative diagnosis has now become the standard of care, histopathologists encounter the daily challenge of making definitive diagnoses on limited breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material. CNB samples are carefully evaluated using microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and supportive immunohistochemistry (IHC), providing the necessary information to inform the next steps in the patient care pathway. Some entities may be difficult to distinguish on small tissue samples, and if there is uncertainty a diagnostic excision biopsy should be recommended. This review discusses (1) benign breast lesions that may mimic malignancy, (2) malignant conditions that may be misinterpreted as benign, (3) malignant conditions that may be incorrectly diagnosed as primary breast carcinoma, and (4) some IHC pitfalls. The aim of the review is to raise awareness of potential pitfalls in the interpretation of breast lesions that may lead to underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, or incorrect classification of malignancy with potential adverse outcomes for individual patients.

Anti-Androgenic Therapies Targeting the Luminal Androgen Receptor of a Typical Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative tumors are progressively delineating their existence over the extended spectrum of breast cancers, marked by intricate molecular heterogeneity, a low overall survival rate, and an unexplored therapeutic approach. Although the basal subtype transcends the group and contributes approximately 80% to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases, the exceptionally appearing mesenchymal and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtypes portray an unfathomable clinical course. LAR with a distinct generic profile frequently metastasizes to regional lymph nodes and bones. This subtype is minimally affected by chemotherapy and shows the lowest pathologic complete response. The androgen receptor is the only sex steroid receptor that plays a cardinal role in the progression of breast cancers and is typically overexpressed in LAR. The partial AR antagonist bicalutamide and the next-generation AR inhibitor enzalutamide are being assessed in standard protocols for the mitigation of TNBC. There arises an inevitable need to probe into the strategies that could neutralize these androgen receptors and alleviate the trajectory of concerning cancer. This paper thus focuses on reviewing literature that provides insights into the anti-androgenic elements against LAR typical TNBC that could pave the way for clinical advancements in this dynamic sphere of oncology.

Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cytology Diagnosis with Implications for Treatment

Breast cancer is among the most frequent malignancies in women worldwide. While early detection and effective treatment provide many women with a cure and prevent their cancer from spreading, metastases to distant sites still occur in around 20% of women suffering from breast cancer. These relapses occur in many forms and locations and are as varied as the primary breast tumors. Metastatic spread makes a cancer incurable and potentially lethal, but new, targeted treatments can offer control of the cancer cells if the features of new targets are unlocked by advanced diagnostic testing. The article offers an overview of the pathomechanisms of metastatic progression and describes the types of metastases, such as hormone-receptor-positive and -negative breast cancers, and HER2-overexpressing or triple-negative types. Once distant metastatic spread occurs, cytology allows a precise diagnosis to confirm the breast origin. Other molecular targets include ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations, MSI, NTRK fusion, PD-L1 expression and others, which can be obtained also from cytology material and used to determine eligibility for emerging targeted therapeutic options. We outline the diagnostic features of metastatic breast cancer in cytology samples, together with validated and emergent biomarkers that may provide new, targeted treatment options.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characteristics of and Diagnostic Dilemmas in Invasive Breast Carcinoma with Choriocarcinomatous Pattern apropos a New Case: A Literature Review with New Findings

BACKGROUND

Invasive breast carcinoma with a choriocarcinomatous pattern (IBC-CP) is extremely rare, and its molecular basis is yet unclear. The choriocarcinomatous pattern is characterized by the biphasic arrangement of multinucleated syncytiotrophoblast-like cells around clusters of monotypic tumor cells in a hemorrhagic background, along with β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) expression. The differentiation of IBC-CP from metastatic choriocarcinoma of the breast (MC-B) is difficult due to the histologic similarity.

METHODS

Based on a literature review and our own case, the clinicopathologic differences between IBC-CP patients (n = 17) and MC-B patients (n = 8) were analyzed. Moreover, in our case of IBC-CP, next-generation sequencing (NGS) comparative analysis was conducted for both choriocarcinomatous and invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) components.

RESULTS

Compared to the MC-B patients, the IBC-CP patients were older (p < 0.001) and less frequently had past histories of gestational trophoblastic disease/pregnancy/abortion (p = 0.001) and distant metastases (p = 0.005). Our case, a 49-year-old female patient, presented with masses in the right breast and axilla. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a radical mastectomy found an 8.5-cm-sized tumor. Microscopically, multinucleated syncytiotrophoblast-like cells were observed around mononuclear tumor cells with hemorrhage and necrosis. Some tumor cells showed β-hCG immunopositivity, which was compatible with IBC-CP. NGS results showed a missense mutation in exon 5 of the TP53 gene in both the choriocarcinomatous and IBC components. Meanwhile, copy number loss in the PTEN gene was only identified in the choriocarcinomatous components.

CONCLUSION

The present IBC-CP case is triple-negative breast cancer with TP53 mutation. The PTEN gene may be associated with choriocarcinomatous differentiation. Obtaining a medical history is mandatory to exclude metastatic lesions.

The Utility of SOX10 Immunohistochemical Staining in Breast Pathology

OBJECTIVES

SOX10 expression helps identify melanocytic lesions. Over time, novel uses have been identified, such as expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the usefulness of SOX10 in breast pathology-specifically, identification and subtyping of TNBC and distinction from gynecologic carcinomas, use as a myoepithelial marker, and in the distinction of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH) from atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

METHODS

Several breast and gynecologic carcinoma tissue microarrays containing a total of 492 cases were stained with SOX10. Whole sections of 34 ADH, 50 UDH, and 29 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples were also stained with SOX10.

RESULTS

SOX10 expression was identified in 67% of consecutive TNBC cases. Expression was mostly seen in nonapocrine, androgen receptor (AR)-negative TNBCs. All gynecologic carcinomas (n = 157) were negative. All UDH cases showed mosaic SOX10 expression, while all ADH cases lacked expression. All estrogen receptor (ER)-positive DCIS (n = 19) specimens were negative for SOX10, while 2 of 10 ER-negative DCIS specimens were positive for SOX10. The latter 2 cases showed SOX10-positive invasive carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX10 identifies nonluminal AR-type TNBC and is useful in distinguishing TNBC from gynecologic carcinomas. SOX10 can distinguish UDH from ADH. SOX10 is not useful in distinguishing ADH from DCIS.

Biomarker profile of invasive lobular carcinoma: pleomorphic versus classic subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis analyses

PURPOSE

To compare the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (P-ILC) and classic ILC (C-ILC) according to the biomarker profile.

METHODS

A total of 667 C-ILCs and 133 P-ILCs between 2011 and 2021 were included. Clinicopathologic features and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) status were evaluated. P-ILCs were divided into subtypes based on ER/PR and HER2 expression. The overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients were compared among matched P-ILCs, C-ILCs, and invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) with biomarker subtypes.

RESULTS

Compared to C-ILCs, P-ILCs had greater tumor sizes and stages, fewer ER-positive, more HER2-positive, triple negative (TN), and Ki-67 > 20% tumors (P < 0.05). P-ILCs were subdivided into ER+ (63.1%), HER2+ (21.1%) and TN (15.8%). ER+ P-ILCs were mainly showed trabecular and solid growth patterns. Apocrine and solid features were more strongly associated with HER2+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs, respectively. The prognosis of each biomarker group (ER+, HER2+ and TN) differed by subtype. The P-ILC biomarker subtypes had worse prognosis than the same subtypes in the IDC group, while there was no difference between the P-ILC and the C-ILC counterparts. Solid variants of P-ILC had the worst prognosis. Bone was the most common metastatic site in ER+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs. HER2+ P-ILCs tended to metastasize to the brain and liver. DFS of HER2+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs were worse than that of ER+ P-ILCs. Lacking lobular carcinoma in situ and sTILs ≤ 10% were associated with worse survival of ER+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs, respectively. For HER2+ P-ILCs, Ki-67 > 20% and sTILs ≤ 10% were significant factors for lower DFS.

CONCLUSION

P-ILCs is an aggressive subtype of ILCs. Analyzing the prognostic factors of P-ILCs with heterogeneous morphological and biomarker characteristics is helpful for creating an individualized treatment.

Immunohistochemistry Applied to Breast Cytological Material

Fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) of the breast are minimally invasive procedures enabling the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. Unfortunately, they are often perceived as inferior to core-needle biopsies, namely because they are supposedly unable to differentiate between high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma or provide material for ancillary testing. Several studies have shown, however, that FNAB samples, when handled properly, are indeed capable of providing sufficient and adequate material for ancillary testing, namely immunocytochemistry (ICC). We reviewed the published literature regarding the use of ICC for both diagnostic and theranostic uses in the different types of cytological samples obtained from FNABs of the breast, including smears, liquid-based cytology samples, and cellblocks. We found that p63 and 34βE12 show promise in aiding in the differential diagnosis between in situ and invasive lesions and that most other diagnostic markers may be used as in tissue. Regarding theranostic ICC markers, results vary between publications, but with care, these can successfully be performed in cytological samples. Air-dried smears should be avoided, and cellblocks are overall more versatile than cytology slides, enabling the evaluation of not only hormonal receptors and HER2 by ICC, but also of Ki-67. Particular attention should be paid to fixation and antigen retrieval procedures in all cases. We recommend that laboratories without experience perform short validation runs before adopting these techniques into clinical practice.

Avoiding "False Positive" and "False Negative" Immunohistochemical Results in Breast Pathology

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an important role in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens to provide both diagnostic and prognostic/therapeutic information. Although most IHCs used in breast pathology can be easily interpreted, pitfalls do exist, especially in some uncommon scenarios. This review intends to focus on the challenging areas such as the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers in differentiating benign proliferation and in situ carcinoma from invasive carcinoma, lobular cell markers in differentiating lobular from ductal carcinoma, cytokeratin and other markers in diagnosing metaplastic carcinoma, and breast tissue origin markers in diagnosing breast primary carcinoma. The challenges in interpreting prognostic and predictive markers will be also discussed.

Low-grade triple-negative breast carcinomas. A report of 2 cases and an update of current concepts

Triple negative breast cancer is defined by the lack of expression of estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors. Significant molecular, morphological and clinical heterogeneity is present in this group of neoplasms. Although the majority are high-grade tumors, low-grade triple negative breast cancers can occur and their evolution, molecular characteristics and therapeutic management vary from the former. In the current review, we focus on the histological and immunohistochemical phenotypes of two new low-grade cases: an acinic cell carcinoma and an adenoid cystic carcinoma. Data originated from the pathology department of a third-level hospital over an 18-month period, within a breast cancer screening program. Low-grade triple negative cancers should be suspected in triple negative breast cancers with low proliferative rates as, unlike high-grade tumors, they require a multidisciplinary approach. They can be diagnosed at an early stage by immunohistochemistry using core needle biopsy.

Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Features of Breast Carcinoma Cutaneous Metastasis

Cutaneous metastases (CMs) account for 2% of all skin malignancies, and nearly 70% of CMs in women originate from breast cancer (BC). CMs are usually associated with poor prognosis, are difficult to treat, and can pose diagnostic problems, such as in histopathological diagnosis when occurring long after development of the primary tumor. In addition, the molecular differences between the primary tumors and their CMs, and between CMs and metastases in other organs, are not well defined. Here, we review the main clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of breast cancer CMs. Identifying molecular markers in primary BC that predict CM and can be used to determine the molecular differences between primary tumors and their metastases is of great interest for the design of new therapeutic approaches.

Cervical cancer progression is regulated by SOX transcription factors: Revealing signaling networks and therapeutic strategies

Cervical cancer is the fourth common gynecologic cancer and is considered as second leading cause of death among women. Various strategies are applied in treatment of cervical cancer including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. However, cervical cancer cells demonstrate aggressive behavior in advanced phases, requiring novel strategies in their elimination. On the other hand, SOX proteins are transcription factors capable of regulating different molecular pathways and their expression varies during embryogenesis, disease development and carcinogenesis. In the present review, our aim is to reveal role of SOX transcription factors in cervical cancer. SOX transcription factors play like a double-edged sword in cancer. For instance, SOX9 possesses both tumor-suppressor and tumor-promoting role in cervical cancer. Therefore, exact role of each SOX members in cervical cancer has been discussed to direct further experiments for revealing other functions. SOX proteins can regulate proliferation and metastasis of cervical cancer cells. Furthermore, response of cervical cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy is tightly regulated by SOX transcription factors. Different downstream targets of SOX proteins such as Wnt signaling, EMT and Hedgehog have been identified. Besides, upstream mediators such as microRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs can regulate SOX expression in cervical cancer. In addition to pre-clinical studies, role of SOX transcription factors as prognostic and diagnostic tools in cervical cancer has been shown.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic biomarkers among pregnant, post-partum and nulliparous women with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of pregnancy-associated, post-partum (PP) and nulliparous (NP) breast cancer (BC) patients and explore mediators of the poor prognosis associated with post-partum BC.

METHODS

A prospective database of 233 women ≤ 40 years of age diagnosed with BC between February 2008 and January 2015 was analysed. Clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes among pregnant, PP and NP patients were compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate factors that were potentially prognostic for the clinical outcomes of interest; a multivariable Cox model was constructed using a forward stepwise selection process. Androgen receptor (AR), GATA3, PDL1 status and the presence/absence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed when possible. Pre-treatment neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were abstracted retrospectively. Statistical significance was defined as a p value ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Women ≤ 2 years PP had a numerically higher incidence of lymph node-positive and high-grade disease and were significantly more likely to have estrogen receptor-negative BC compared to NP controls. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, increasingly poor outcomes were observed among NP (longest OS), > 2 years PP, ≤ 2 years PP and pregnant (shortest OS) patients, but these differences were not statistically significant. The ≤ 2 years PP group had significantly lower AR expression, a strong trend toward higher PDL1 expression and a higher expression of stromal TILs compared to NP women.

CONCLUSIONS

PPBC patients had numerically lower DFS and OS compared to NP controls. Higher PDL1 and stromal TILs in PPBC suggest that adjuvant immunotherapy may be effective in the post-partum BC subgroup.

A Challenging Task: Identifying Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) According to ESMO Guidelines: The CUPISCO Trial Experience

BACKGROUND

CUPISCO is an ongoing randomized phase II trial (NCT03498521) comparing molecularly guided therapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with "unfavorable" cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with an unfavorable CUP diagnosis, as defined by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and available cancer tissue for molecular sequencing are generally eligible. Potential patients with CUP entering screening undergo a review involving reference histopathology and clinical work-up by a central eligibility review team (ERT). Patients with "favorable" CUP, a strongly suspected primary site of origin, lack of tissue, or unmet inclusion criteria are excluded.

RESULTS

As of April 30, 2020, 628 patients had entered screening and 346 (55.1%) were screen failed. Screen fails were due to technical reasons (n = 89), failure to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria not directly related to CUP diagnosis (n = 89), and other reasons (n = 33). A total of 124 (35.8%) patients were excluded because unfavorable adeno- or poorly differentiated CUP could not be confirmed by the ERT. These cases were classified into three groups ineligible because of (a) histologic subtype, such as squamous and neuroendocrine, or favorable CUP; (b) evidence of a possible primary tumor; or (c) noncarcinoma histology.

CONCLUSION

Experience with CUPISCO has highlighted challenges with standardized screening in an international clinical trial and the difficulties in diagnosing unfavorable CUP. Reconfirmation of unfavorable CUP by an ERT in a clinical trial can result in many reasons for screen failures. By sharing this experience, we aim to foster understanding of diagnostic challenges and improve diagnostic pathology and clinical CUP algorithms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A high unmet need exists for improved treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP); however, study in a trial setting is faced with the significant challenge of definitively distinguishing CUP from other cancer types. This article reports the authors' experience of this challenge so far in the ongoing CUPISCO trial, which compares treatments guided by patients' unique genetic signatures versus standard chemotherapy. The data presented will aid future decision-making regarding diagnosing true CUP cases; this will have far-reaching implications in the design, execution, and interpretation of not only CUPISCO but also future clinical studies aiming to find much-needed treatment strategies.

Clinical Implications of Androgen-Positive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

This review summarizes the recent findings of a vast array of studies conducted on androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer (AR-positive TNBC) to provide a better understanding of this specific breast cancer subgroup. AR expression is correlated with higher age, lower histological grade, lower proliferation index Ki-67, spiculated masses, and calcifications on mammography. Studies investigating the correlation between AR expression and lymph node metastasis are highly discordant. In addition, results regarding prognosis are highly contradictory. AR antagonists are a promising novel therapeutic approach in AR-positive TNBC. However, AR signaling pathways should be more investigated in order to understand the influence of AR expression on TNBC more thoroughly.

Cytokeratin 7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is a Comprehensive Panel in Diagnosing Triple Negative Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Following lung cancer, breast cancer is the second most common metastatic tumor to the brain, of which triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ (HER2+) breast cancer are the most common subtypes. TNBC does not have standard immunoprofiles and can be difficult to distinguish from other metastases. A tissue microarray was created from 47 patients with breast cancer metastases to the brain and 12 paired breast primaries. Of 47 breast cancer metastases, 24 were HER2+, 14 were TNBC, and 9 were luminal. Forty-five were cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive, 36 were GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) positive, 7 were Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX-10) positive, 20 were mammaglobin positive, and 19 were gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 positive. At least one of the CK7, GATA3, or SOX-10 was positive in all TNBC metastases. A panel of CK7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is complementary in the diagnosis of breast cancer brain metastasis. SOX-10 appears to be a specific but not particularly sensitive marker in this context.

Pleural mesothelioma classification update

The 2015 WHO classification of pleural mesotheliomas includes three major histologic subtypes-epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic. Recent genomic data has supported the need for a more granular and clinically valid classification beyond the three current subtypes. Because of tumor rarity and overlapping histologic features with other tumor types, diagnostic immunohistochemical work up is essential component in establishing the final diagnosis of mesothelioma. The use of BAP1 and CDKN2A/MTAP improves the diagnostic sensitivity of effusion specimens and are valuable in establishing the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma. The major change in the forthcoming WHO classification is the inclusion of mesothelioma in situ as a diagnostic category. In this review, we discuss recently proposed changes in the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma, differential diagnosis, and importance of ancillary diagnostic studies.

Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: interpretation and pitfalls

Immunohistochemistry is an essential component of diagnostic breast pathology. The emergence of novel assays and applications is accompanied by new interpretation criteria and potential pitfalls. Immunohistochemistry assists in supporting breast origin for primary or metastatic carcinomas and identifying non-mammary metastases to the breast; however, no single immunostain is perfectly sensitive nor specific. GATA3 and Sox10 are particularly useful immunostains to identify triple negative breast carcinoma, which are often negative for other markers of mammary differentiation. Sox10 labeling is a major potential diagnostic pitfall, as Sox10 and S-100 label both triple negative breast carcinoma and metastatic melanoma; a pan-cytokeratin immunostain should always be included for this differential diagnosis. Novel immunohistochemistry serves as surrogates for the molecular alterations unique to several of special-type breast carcinomas, including the use of MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma, pan-TRK in secretory carcinoma, and mutant IDH2 in tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP). In addition, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is an emerging, albeit imperfect, biomarker for breast cancer immunotherapy, with different assay parameters and scoring criteria in breast carcinoma compared to other tumor types. The expanding repertoire of novel immunohistochemistry provides additional diagnostic tools and biomarkers that improve diagnostic breast pathology and patient care.

Sex-Determining Region Y Chromosome-Related High-Mobility-Group Box 10 in Cancer: A Potential Therapeutic Target

Sex-determining region Y-related high mobility group-box 10 (SOX10), a member of the SOX family, has recently been highlighted as an essential transcriptional factor involved in developmental biology. Recently, the functionality of SOX 10 has been increasingly revealed by researchers worldwide. It has been reported that SOX10 significantly regulates the proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of tumors and is closely associated with the progression of cancer. In this review, we first introduce the basic background of the SOX family and SOX10 and then discuss the pathophysiological roles of SOX10 in cancer. Besides, we enumerate the application of SOX10 in the pathological diagnosis and therapeutic potential of cancer. Eventually, we summarize the potential directions and perspectives of SOX10 in neoplastic theranostics. The information compiled herein may assist in additional studies and increase the potential of SOX10 as a therapeutic target for cancer.

Predictive markers for pathological complete response after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

A combination of Sox10 and GATA3 was previously identified as a marker for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but it is uncertain whether their expression is associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study investigates the predictive value of clinicopathological characteristics, as well as protein expression of Sox10, GATA3, p53 and p63, in a consecutive series of TNBC patients treated with NAC. Archived hematoxylin & eosin stained slides of core biopsies and resection specimens from 35 TNBC patients were reviewed. The following clinicopathological characteristics were determined at the biopsy level: age at diagnosis, cancer type, Nottingham grade, lympho-vascular invasion, syncytial growth, necrosis, clear cell differentiation, myxoid peritumor stroma, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and presence of an in situ component. The MD Anderson residual cancer burden (RCB) score and corresponding RCB class were determined. Immunohistochemistry for Sox10, p53, GATA3 and p63 was performed at the biopsy level. sTILs, either as a continuous or as a dichotomous variable, were the only parameter that was significantly associated with pCR in univariable and multivariable analyses. Assessment of sTILs showed moderate to good interobserver agreement. High sTILs (≥40%) were significantly associated with increased pCR rates, and this association was observer-independent. This retrospective study of a consecutive community-based cohort of TNBC patients confirms that sTILs are a robust, observer-independent predictor for therapeutic response after NAC. The combination of Sox10, GATA3 and p53 immunoreactivity is unlikely to harbor any predictive value for pCR in TNBC.

S-100 protein and SOX10-positive breast carcinoma mimicking metastatic melanoma

We present a case detailing a 70-year-old female with a history of triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) of the left breast and contralateral stage pT2a nodular melanoma of the right upper arm who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy of the right axilla demonstrating a metastatic epithelioid tumor that was strongly positive for S-100 protein and SOX10. The tumor cells were negative for HMB-45 and Melan-A and positive for CK7 and other breast markers (GCDFP15, mammaglobin, and GATA3). While concerning for metastatic melanoma based on clinical history and initial immunohistochemistry, tumor morphology and subsequent immunohistochemistry was supportive of metastatic breast adenocarcinoma. This case demonstrates a rare but perilous diagnostic pitfall of triple-negative breast carcinomas that strongly and diffusely express S-100 protein and SOX10 mimicking melanoma.

Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer

AIMS

Confirmation of a breast origin for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is sometimes problematic. The traditional breast markers GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), mammaglobin (MGB) and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) have shown limitations in identifying TNBC. Here, we aimed to examine the diagnostic potential of the newly proposed TNBC marker, Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed and compared SOX10 expression with GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 expression in a test cohort of 1838 invasive breast cancers (IBCs) by using tissue microarrays. The findings from the test cohort were further examined with a validation cohort of 42 TNBCs in whole sections. The overall expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 6.9%, 83.1%, 47.0%, and 34.8%, respectively. Among the TNBCs within this cohort, the expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 31.3%, 34.5%, 27.9%, and 25.2%, respectively. SOX10 was strongly associated with TNBC (P < 0.001), whereas all other traditional markers were associated with non-TNBC (P < 0.001 for all). In addition, SOX10 was more correlated to basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) (P = 0.001) than five-marker-negative subtype among the TNBCs. A high expression rate of SOX10 (81%) was confirmed in the validation cohort. Additionally, SOX10 expression was inversely correlated with GATA3 and GCDFP15 expression, so they may complement each other in TNBC detection. The SOX10-GATA3 combination yielded a sensitivity of 60.3% for TNBC detection in the test cohort.

CONCLUSION

SOX10 is a reliable marker for identifying TNBC, and complements GATA3. The SOX10-GATA3 combination may be used as a sensitive TNBC marker.

Immunohistological Expression of SOX-10 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Analysis of 113 Samples

Background: SRY-related HMG-box 10 (SOX-10) is commonly expressed in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data on the biological significance of SOX-10 expression is limited. Therefore, we investigated immunhistological SOX-10 expression in TNBC and correlated the results with genetic alterations and clinical data. Methods: A tissue microarray including 113 TNBC cases was stained by SOX-10. Immunohistological data of AR, BCL2, CD117, p53 and Vimentin was available from a previous study. Semiconductor-based panel sequencing data including commonly altered breast cancer genes was also available from a previous investigation. SOX-10 expression was correlated with clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and genetic data. Results: SOX-10 was significantly associated with CD117 and Vimentin, but not with AR expression. An association of SOX-10 with BCL2, EGFR or p53 staining was not observed. SOX-10-positive tumors harbored more often TP53 mutations but less frequent mutations of PIK3CA or alterations of the PIK3K pathway. SOX-10 expression had no prognostic impact either on disease-free, distant disease-free, or overall survival. Conclusions: While there might be a value of SOX-10 as a differential diagnostic marker to identify metastases of TNBC, its biological role remains to be investigated.

Dissecting the heterogeneity of the alternative polyadenylation profiles in triple-negative breast cancers

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with high heterogeneity. However, the alternative polyadenylation (APA) profiles of TNBC remain unknown. Here, we aimed to define the characteristics of the APA events at post-transcription level among TNBCs. Methods: Using transcriptome microarray data, we analyzed APA profiles of 165 TNBC samples and 33 paired normal tissues. A pooled short hairpin RNA screen targeting 23 core cleavage and polyadenylation (C/P) genes was used to identify key C/P factors. Results: We established an unconventional APA subtyping system composed of four stable subtypes: 1) luminal androgen receptor (LAR), 2) mesenchymal-like immune-activated (MLIA), 3) basal-like (BL), 4) suppressed (S) subtypes. Patients in the S subtype had the worst disease-free survival comparing to other patients (log-rank p = 0.021). Enriched clinically actionable pathways and putative therapeutic APA events were analyzed among each APA subtype. Furthermore, CPSF1 and PABPN1 were identified as the master C/P factors in regulating APA events and TNBC proliferation. The depletion of CPSF1 or PABPN1 weakened cell proliferation, enhanced apoptosis, resulted in cell cycle redistribution and a reversion of APA events of genes associated with tumorigenesis, proliferation, metastasis and chemosensitivity in breast cancer. Conclusions: Our findings advance the understanding of tumor heterogeneity regulation in APA and yield new insights into therapeutic target identification in TNBC.

SOX10 is as specific as S100 protein in detecting metastases of melanoma in lymph nodes and is recommended for sentinel lymph node assessment

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy remains crucial for melanoma staging. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group recommends performing immunohistochemical stainings for reproducible identification of melanoma metastases. S100 protein (pS100) is a commonly used melanocytic antigen because of its high sensitivity in spite of relatively low specificity. SRY-related HMG-box 10 protein (SOX10) is a transcription factor characterising neural crest-derived cells. It is uniformly expressed mostly in the nuclei of melanocytes, neural, and myoepithelial cells. Pathologists sometimes prefer SOX10 as a melanoma marker, but it has not yet been investigated on a large-scale to confirm that it is reliable and recommendable for routine SLN evaluation.

METHODS

Four hundred one treatment-naïve lymph node (LN) metastatic melanomas were included in high-density tissue microarrays and were assessed for the presence of SOX10 and pS100 by immunohistochemistry. The slides were digitalised, shared and evaluated by a panel of experienced melanoma pathologists.

RESULTS

The vast majority of melanomas were double-positive for pS100 and SOX10 (93.2%); a small percentage of the cases (3.9%) were double-negative melanomas. Discordance between the two markers was observed: 1.9% pS100(-)/SOX10(+) and 0.75% pS100(+)/SOX10(-). SOX10 was not expressed by immune cell types in the LN, resulting in a less controversial interpretation of the staining.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX10 is as equally specific as pS100 for the detection of melanoma metastases in LNs. The interpretation of SOX10 staining is highly reproducible among different centres and different pathologists because of the absence of staining of immune cells.

Combined SOX10 GATA3 is most sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic breast cancers: a comparative study of breast markers in multiple tumors

PURPOSE

For invasive breast cancer (IBC), high SOX10 expression was reported particularly in TNBC. This raised the possibility that SOX10 may complement other breast markers for determining cancers of breast origin.

METHODS

Here, we compared the expression of SOX10 with other breast markers (GATA3, mammaglobin and GCDFP15) and their combined expression in a large cohort of IBC together with nodal metastases. We have also evaluated the expression of GATA3 and SOX10 in a wide spectrum of non-breast carcinomas to assess their value as breast specific markers.

RESULTS

Compared with other markers, SOX10 showed lower overall sensitivity (6.5%), but higher sensitivity in TNBC (31.4%) than other breast markers including GATA3 (29.7% for TNBC). Its expression demonstrated the highest concordance between the paired IBC and nodal metastases (96.4%, κ = 0.663) among all the breast markers. More importantly, SOX10 identified many GATA3-negative TNBC, thus the SOX10/GATA3 combination was the most sensitive marker combination for IBC (86.6%). For non-breast carcinoma, a high SOX10/GATA3 expression rate was found in melanoma (77.9%, predominately expressed SOX10), urothelial carcinoma (82.0%, predominately expressed GATA3) and salivary gland tumors (69.4%). Other carcinomas, including cancers from lungs, showed very low expression for the marker combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggested that SOX10/GATA3 combination can be used for differentiating metastases of breast and multiple non-breast origins. However, the differentiation with melanoma and urothelial tumors required more careful histologic examination, thorough clinical information and additional site-specific IHC markers. For salivary gland tumors, the overlapping tumor types with IBC renders the differentiation difficult.

High frequency of p16 and SOX10 coexpression but not androgen receptor expression in triple-negative breast cancers

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) represent approximately 12-17% of all breast cancers and have distinctively aggressive clinical courses. Because routine biomarkers for breast cancer do not apply for TNBCs, it is essential to find novel prognostic markers and potential targets for therapeutic agents. p16 and SOX10 are emerging biomarkers with relatively unexplored expressions in TNBCs. We present an analysis of the expression of p16 and SOX10 in combination with that of androgen receptor (AR) and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 in TNBCs. In addition, we used tissue microarrays (TMAs) to compare frequencies of p16 and SOX10 between TNBCs and non-TNBCs. Fifty-six TNBC samples with clinical data were stained immunohistochemically with p16, SOX10, AR, and CK5/6. Fifty-four cases (96.4%) were invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified, and 46 cases (82.1%) were Nottingham histologic grade 3. The majority of TNBC cases were positive for p16 (n = 44; 78.6%) and SOX10 (n = 48; 85.7%). AR was positive in 15 cases (26.8%). CK5/6 was positive in 24 cases (42.9%), which were classified as basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) subtype. The frequencies of p16 and SOX10 expression in BLBC and non-BLBC subtypes did not reveal significant statistical difference in a separate analysis. Using archived TNBC and non-TNBC TMAs, we observed that 56% of TNBC cases were positive for p16 compared with 16% of non-TNBC cases (p-value <0.0001). SOX10 was positive in 80% of TNBC cases compared with 35% of non-TNBC cases (p-value <0.0001). A significant correlation was observed between p16 and SOX10 coexpression in TNBC cases (n = 56/80, p = 0.02) but not in non-TNBC cases (n = 23/348; p = 0.626). In conclusion, p16 and SOX10 are frequently expressed in TNBC, regardless of CK5/6 expression. Furthermore, p16 and SOX10 are often coexpressed in TNBCs compared with non-TNBCs.

SOX10 - A Novel Marker for the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Metaplastic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Introduction

Differential diagnosis of metaplastic squamous cell carcinoma of breast (MSCCB) is difficult. In particular, in terms of metastatic MSCCB, because of the low speciality of traditional markers such as mammaglobin, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), the most common problem is differentiating the spread of MSCCB to the lung from a primary lung squamous cell carcinoma. It is urgently required to explore a novel marker to aid in differential diagnosis.

Aim

The aim of this study is to explore a novel marker to aid in the differential diagnosis of MSCCB from other squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in other organs.

Methods

We tested the expression of SOX10 in 375 human SCC specimens with immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

In a series of 20 MSCCB, 9 (45%) were positive for SOX10. All of them were triple-negative MSCCB. Conversely, SOX10 was totally negative in another 205 SCC originating from lung, skin, cervix, oral mucosa, and esophagus. In a series of 150 triple-negative breast cancer and their metastatic foci, SOX10 labeling in the primary tumor and metastasis was 78% and 79.3%, respectively, and the agreement rate was 97.3% (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that SOX10 was recommended for differentiating MSCCB from non-mammary metastasis to the breast, as well as for distinguishing primary SCC from metastatic MSCCB, and SOX10 may be valuable in the pathological diagnosis of breast-derived metaplastic squamous cell carcinoma.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

Emerging Role of SOX Proteins in Breast Cancer Development and Maintenance

The SOX genes encode a family of more than 20 transcription factors that are critical regulators of embryogenesis and developmental processes and, when aberrantly expressed, have been shown to contribute to tumor development and progression in both an oncogenic and tumor suppressive role. Increasing evidence demonstrates that the SOX proteins play essential roles in multiple cellular processes that mediate or contribute to oncogenic transformation and tumor progression. In the context of breast cancer, SOX proteins function both as oncogenes and tumor suppressors and have been shown to be associated with tumor stage and grade and poor prognosis. Experimental evidence demonstrates that a subset of SOX proteins regulate critical aspects of breast cancer biology including cancer stemness and multiple signaling pathways leading to altered cell proliferation, survival, and tumor development; EMT, cell migration and metastasis; as well as other tumor associated characteristics. This review will summarize the role of SOX family members as important mediators of tumorigenesis in breast cancer, with an emphasis on the triple negative or basal-like subtype of breast cancer, as well as examine the therapeutic potential of these genes and their downstream targets.