Single institutional experience on primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the kidney: a rare distinct entity

Innovative approaches in predicting outcomes for rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms pose significant challenges due to their varied presentations and prognoses. Traditional prognostic models, while useful, often fall short of accurately predicting clinical outcomes for these patients. This article discusses the development and implications of a novel prognostic tool, the GATIS score, which aims to enhance predictive accuracy and guide treatment strategies more effectively than current methods. Utilizing data from a large cohort and employing sophisticated statistical models, the GATIS score integrates clinical and pathological markers to provide a nuanced assessment of prognosis. We evaluate the potential of this score to transform clinical decision-making processes, its integration into current medical practices, and future directions for its development. The integration of genetic markers and other biomarkers could further refine its predictive power, highlighting the ongoing need for innovation in the management of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Cytopathology and clinicopathological correlation of renal neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of documentation regarding cytopathology of renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) due to their rarity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five cytology cases were gathered from 3 institutes.

RESULTS

Cohort consisted of 4 females and 1 male. Fine needle aspiration biopsy and touch preparation slides of core needle biopsy revealed cellular samples, composed of round, plasmacytoid, or columnar cells. Tumor cells were present in nested, acinar, 3D cluster, and individual cell patterns. Tumor cells in 3 cases exhibited uniformly round to oval small nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli, finely granular chromatin, and smooth nuclear membranes, whereas 2 other cases showed pleomorphic nuclei with conspicuous nucleoli, nuclear molding, and irregular nuclear membranes. Tumor cells displayed pale or granular cytoplasm, with 1 case showing small vacuoles. Examination of cores and cell blocks demonstrated tumor cells in sheets, nests, or acini. All tumor cells were positive for neuroendocrine immunomarkers. Based on mitotic count, Ki-67 index and morphology, 3 tumors were graded as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) (1 grade [G] 3, 1 G2, 1 G1) and 2 as large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Deletion of 7q, 10q, and 19q was detected in WDNETs. Two patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and 1 with WDNET G3 underwent chemotherapy due to aggressiveness, whereas nephrectomy was performed for patients with WDNET G1 and 2 without metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytopathological characteristics of renal NENs closely resemble those affecting other organs. Despite its rarity, renal NENs should be kept in mind when confronted with morphological resemblances to NENs, to prevent misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapeutic interventions.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a review of the literature

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare type of neoplasm that originate from neuroendocrine cells and peptide neurons. Primary renal well-differentiated NETs are extremely rare, and only a few cases have been reported worldwide. In this study, we present a new case of primary renal well-differentiated NET at our institution, followed by a literature review. A systematic search was conducted using various search terms to identify relevant literature on primary renal well-differentiated NETs from 2021 to present. The study analyzed the clinical features, age, gender, tumor size, location, gross pathology, light microscopy, and immunohistochemical results of 32 cases of primary renal well-differentiated NETs. The findings suggest that these tumors are rare and have nonspecific clinical and imaging features. The diagnosis heavily relies on immunohistochemical analysis. Primary renal well-differentiated NETs are associated with low malignant potential and a favorable prognosis. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment, and long-term follow-up is necessary to monitor the patient's condition.

Prognostic factors and treatment impact on overall survival in patients with renal neuroendocrine tumour

Background

Renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NEN) are exceptionally rare tumours characterized by high mortality rates.

Objective

The objective of this study is to analyse prognostic factors and treatment impact on overall survival in patients with R-NEN.

Design setting and participants

We identified all patients with R-NEN in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 and identified prognostic factors for improved survival.

Results and limitations

Of 542 R-NEN cases, 166 (31%) were neuroendocrine tumour grade 1 (NET-G1), 14 (3%) were neuroendocrine tumour grade 2 (NET-G2), 169 (31%) were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC-NOS), 18 (3%) were large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LC-NEC) and 175 (32%) were small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SC-NEC). Median overall survival for all patients in the study was 44.88 months (SE, 4.265; 95% CI, 27.57-62.19). Median overall survival was 7.89 months (SE 0.67; 95% CI, 6.58-9.20) for patients without surgical intervention and 136.61 months (SE 16.44; 95% CI, 104.38-168.84, p < 0.001) for patients who underwent surgery. Increased age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; p < 0.001), T4 stage disease (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.96-5.1; p < 0.001), NEC-NOS histology (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.64-4.86; p < 0.001), LC-NEC histology (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.04-7.17; p = 0.041) and SC-NEC histology (HR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.95-9.05; p < 0.001) were all positive predictors of worsening overall survival. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design.

Conclusion

R-NEN is an aggressive tumour characterized by high mortality rates. Surgery continues to be the mainstay of treatment and has shown to provide a survival benefit for most patients.

Patient Summary

R-NEN is composed of several tumour histologies that differ based on their aggressiveness with NEC-NOS and SC-NEC being the most lethal. Surgery, predominantly through minimally invasive approaches, is the mainstay of treatment and has a clear survival benefit.

Renal neuroendocrine tumors: clinical and molecular pathology with an emphasis on frequent association with ectopic Cushing syndrome

Renal neuroendocrine tumors (RenNETs) are rare malignancies with largely unknown biology, hormone expression, and genetic abnormalities. This study aims to improve our understanding of the RenNETs with emphasis of functional, hormonal, and genetic features. Surgically resected RenNETs (N = 13) were retrieved, and immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in all cases. In addition, all published RenNETs were systematically reviewed. Our cohort (4 men and 9 women, mean age 42, mean tumor size 7.6 cm) included 2 patients with Cushing syndrome (CS). WHO grade (23% G1, 54% G2, and 23% G3) and tumor progression did not correlate. CS-associated RenNETs (CS-RenNETs) showed a solid and eosinophilic histology and stained for ACTH, while the remaining non-functioning tumors had a trabecular pattern and expressed variably hormones somatostatin (91%), pancreatic polypeptide (63%), glucagon (54%), and serotonin (18%). The transcription factors ISL1 and SATB2 were expressed in all non-functioning, but not in CS-RenNETs. NGS revealed no pathogenic alterations or gene fusions. In the literature review (N = 194), 15 (8%) of the patients had hormonal syndromes, in which CS being the most frequent (7/15). Large tumor size and presence of metastasis were associated with shorter patients' survival (p < 0.01). RenNETs present as large tumors with metastases. CS-RenNETs differ through ACTH production and solid-eosinophilic histology from the non-functioning trabecular RenNETs that produce pancreas-related hormones and express ISL1 and SATB2. MEN1 or DAXX/ARTX abnormalities and fusion genes are not detected in RenNETs, indicating a distinct yet unknown molecular pathogenesis.

Primary Renal Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Analyis of Six Cases from a Tertiary Care Center in North India with Review of Literature

Well-differentiated renal neuroendocrine tumors are rare tumors. As their biologic behavior is not fully known, there is a need to know more about these cases. We performed a retrospective chart review of all the cases diagnosed with renal neuroendocrine tumors from January 2016 to December 2020 (five years) in order to understand their clinical features, morphological characteristics and outcome. We included six cases with mean age of 46.2 years (4 males) in our study. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy. Histologically all showed tumor disposed in nests and trabeculae and majority of the tumors belonged to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor Grade 1 (WHO criteria of gastoroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms). Lymph node metastasis was seen in two cases at the time of clinical presentation. All the tumors were diffusely positive for neuroendocrine tumor markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin, NSE, CD56). Follow-up data was available in all cases with an average follow-up of two years and neither has shown evidence of metastasis or relapse till last follow-up. Role of morphological patterns and immunohistochemical markers is highlighted with the importance of including Ki-67 index in grading them to better understand their outcome.

Urinary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated in the "Modern Era": A Multicenter Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary).

CONCLUSION

This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

Primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic literature review, report of four local cases, and original survival analysis of 63 patients from a national registry 2012-2018

Primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare. We aimed to conduct a systematic review, present local cases, and analyse data from the England's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to provide comprehensive evidence on clinical experience, incidence, and survival to better characterize these tumours. First, a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method; second, a synthesis of local cases; and, finally, a retrospective population-based cohort analysis of renal NEN recorded between 2012 and 2018 on NCRAS were performed. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to calculate overall survival and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify prognostic factors. Systematic review identified 48 articles and the evidence was summarized and presented. We reported data from four local cases presenting with abdominal and back pain but without carcinoid syndrome. In population-based analysis, we identified 63 cases of renal NEN between 2012 and 2018 from the registry. Age-standardized incidence was 0.09-0.32 per million with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range = 48-72 years). Survival was worse in males and those aged 64 years and over. Five-year survival for renal neuroendocrine tumours (NET) was 69.8% (95% confidence interval = 66.6-72.7) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) was 38.4% (95% confidence interval = 34.6-42.0). No independent predictive factor was identified in the multivariable analyses. We have given a systematic review of evidence, published local experience, and reported incidence and survival of renal NEN in England for the first time. We have provided clinicians with evidence on diagnosis and proposed a treatment algorithm of theses rare tumours. The incidence and median age of presentation in England is similar to other published series. Renal NET has better survival than renal NEC as expected. A uniform classification system would reduce inconsistencies in reporting and standardize treatment decisions for this neoplasia.

Biomarker Landscape in Neuroendocrine Tumors With High-Grade Features: Current Knowledge and Future Perspective

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are classified based on morphology and are graded based on their proliferation rate as either well-differentiated low-grade (G1) to intermediate (G2–G3) or poorly differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC G3). Recently, in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, a new subgroup of well-differentiated high-grade tumors (NET G3) has been divided from NEC by WHO due to its different clinical–pathologic features. Although several mutational analyses have been performed, a molecular classification of NET is an unmet need in particular for G3, which tends to be more aggressive and have less benefit to the available therapies. Specifically, new possible prognostic and, above all, predictive factors are highly awaited, giving the basis for new treatments. Alteration of KRAS, TP53, and RB1 is mainly reported, but also druggable alterations, including BRAF and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), have been documented in subsets of patients. In addition, PD-L1 demonstrated to be highly expressed in G3 NETs, probably becoming a new biomarker for G3 neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) discrimination and a predictive one for immunotherapy response. In this review, we describe the current knowledge available on a high-grade NET molecular landscape with a specific focus on those harboring potentially therapeutic targets in the advanced setting.

A Rare Case of a Large Primary Renal Neuroendocrine Tumour: A Case Report and Brief Review of Literature

Primary renal neuroendocrine tumours are very rare clinical entities, and as such, relatively little is known about their clinical progression. Here, we outline the case of a young female patient presenting with abdominal pain and a large 14 cm right renal mass. Initial radiological studies demonstrated localised disease, but during surgical resection, widespread liver metastasis was identified. Histological analysis revealed a grade 2, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour pT3a. Whilst surgical resection remains the gold standard for localised disease, further work is required to understand the pathogenesis, prognostic indicators and treatment following metastatic spread. The poor prognosis seen in primary renal neuroendocrine neoplasia highlights the importance of further directed research in this area.