Medullary carcinoma of the ampulla has distinct clinicopathologic characteristics including common association with microsatellite instability and PD-L1 expression

Comparison of Ampullary and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Smaller Invasion, Common Adenomatous Components, Resectability, and Histology are Factors for Improved Survival for Patients with Ampullary Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The information on the clinicopathologic/outcome differences between ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) has been conflicting to the extent that it still is questioned whether ACs need to be recognized separately from PCs.

METHODS

The characteristics of 413 ACs were compared with those of 547 PCs.

RESULTS

The ACs had a better prognosis than the PCs (5-year survival, 57 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Even the pancreatobiliary (PB)-type ACs had a better prognosis (5-year survival, 46 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Several differences also were identified as contributing factors: (1) the preinvasive adenomatous component often constituted a significant proportion of the mass in ACs (>50 % of the tumor in 16 % vs 1.5 %; p < 0.001); (2) the mean size of the carcinoma was smaller in ACs (2.5 vs 3.2 cm; p < 0.001): when matched for invasion size, the survival advantage of AC was minimized, and when matched for invasion size larger than 2 cm, the survival advantage of AC lost its statistical significance; (3) lymph node (LN) metastases were less common in ACs (49 % vs 71 %; p < 0.001); (4) the definitive R1 rate was lower in ACs (4 % vs 23.5 %; p < 0.001); and (5) non-PB and non-tubular adenocarcinoma types were more common in ACs (17 % vs 3 %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparatively, ACs have better clinical survival than PCs. Potential contributing factors are the relative abundance of the preinvasive component, smaller invasion, lower LN metastasis rate, higher resectability, and common occurrence of less aggressive histologic phenotypes (intestinal, medullary, mucinous). However, this survival advantage is sustained even in PB-type ACs, highlighting the importance of accurately determining the site of origin.

Medullary carcinomas of the nonampullary small intestine: association with coeliac disease, mismatch repair deficiency, PD-L1 expression, and favourable prognosis

AIM

Gastrointestinal medullary carcinoma is a rare histologic subtype of adenocarcinoma. As nonampullary small bowel medullary carcinomas (SB-MCs) are poorly characterized, we aimed to analyse their clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features and to compare them with nonmedullary small bowel adenocarcinomas (NM-SBAs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Surgically resected SBAs collected through the Small Bowel Cancer Italian Consortium were classified as SB-MCs (carcinomas with ≥50% of tumour fulfilling the typical histologic criteria of MC) or NM-SBAs. Immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin (CK)7, CK20, CDX2, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mismatch repair proteins was performed in both SB-MCs and NM-SBAs. SB-MCs were also tested for CK8/18, synaptophysin, SMARCB1, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and ARID1A and for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded RNAs by in-situ hybridization. MLH1 promoter methylation status was evaluated in MLH1-deficient cases. Eleven SB-MCs and 149 NM-SBAs were identified. One (9%) SB-MC was EBV-positive, while 10 (91%) harboured mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was found in all eight dMMR SB-MCs tested. Switch/sucrose nonfermentable deficiency was seen in two (18%) SB-MCs, both with isolated loss of ARID1A. Compared with NM-SBAs, SB-MCs exhibited an association with coeliac disease (P < 0.001), higher rates of dMMR (P < 0.001), and PD-L1 positivity by both tumour proportion score and combined positive score (P < 0.001 for both), and a lower rate of CK20 expression (P = 0.024). Survival analysis revealed a better prognosis of SB-MC patients compared to NM-SBA cases (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

SB-MCs represent a distinct histologic subtype, with peculiar features compared to NM-SBAs, including association with coeliac disease, dMMR, PD-L1 expression, and better prognosis.

Intra-ampullary Papillary Tubular Neoplasm (IAPN): Clinicopathologic Analysis of 72 Cases Highlights the Distinctive Characteristics of a Poorly Recognized Entity

The guidelines recently recognized the intra-ampullary papillary tubular neoplasm (IAPN) as a distinct tumor entity. However, the data on IAPN and its distinction from other ampullary tumors remain limited. A detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 72 previously unpublished IAPNs was performed. The patients were: male/female=1.8; mean age=67 years (range: 42 to 86 y); mean size=2.3 cm. Gross-microscopic correlation was crucial. From the duodenal perspective, the ampulla was typically raised symmetrically, with a patulous orifice, and was otherwise covered by stretched normal duodenal mucosa. However, in 6 cases, the protrusion of the intra-ampullary tumor to the duodenal surface gave the impression of an "ampullary-duodenal tumor," with the accurate diagnosis of IAPN established only by microscopic correlation illustrating the abrupt ending of the lesion at the edge of the ampulla. Microscopically, the preinvasive component often revealed mixed phenotypes (44.4% predominantly nonintestinal). The invasion was common (94%), typically small (mean=1.2 cm), primarily pancreatobiliary-type (75%), and showed aggressive features (lymphovascular invasion in 66%, perineural invasion in 41%, high budding in 30%). In 6 cases, the preinvasive component was pure intestinal, but the invasive component was pancreatobiliary. LN metastasis was identified in 42% (32% in those with ≤1 cm invasion). The prognosis was significantly better than ampullary-ductal carcinomas (median: 69 vs. 41 months; 3-year: 68% vs. 55%; and 5-year: 51% vs. 35%, P =0.047). In conclusion, unlike ampullary-duodenal carcinomas, IAPNs are often (44.4%) predominantly nonintestinal and commonly (94%) invasive, displaying aggressive features and LN metastasis even when minimally invasive, all of which render them less amenable to ampullectomy. However, their prognosis is still better than that of the "ampullary-ductal" carcinomas, with which IAPNs are currently grouped in CAP protocols (while IAPNs are kindreds of intraductal tumors of the pancreatobiliary tract, the latter represents the ampullary counterpart of pancreatic adenocarcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma).

Colorectal medullary carcinoma: a pathological subtype with intense immune response and potential to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Different pathological types of colorectal cancer have distinguished immune landscape, and the efficacy of immunotherapy will be completely different. Colorectal medullary carcinoma, accounting for 2.2-3.2%, is characterized by massive lymphocyte infiltration. However, the attention to the immune characteristics of colorectal medullary carcinoma is insufficient.

AREA COVERED

We searched the literature about colorectal medullary carcinoma on PubMed through November 2023to investigate the hallmarks of colorectal medullary carcinoma's immune landscape, compare medullary carcinoma originating from different organs and provide theoretical evidence for precise treatment, including applying immunotherapy and BRAF inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Colorectal medullary carcinoma is a pathological subtype with intense immune response, with six immune characteristics and has the potential to benefit from immunotherapy. Mismatch repair deficiency, ARID1A missing and BRAF V600E mutation often occurs. IFN-γ pathway is activated and PD-L1 expression is increased. Abundant lymphocyte infiltration performs tumor killing function. In addition, BRAF mutation plays an important role in the occurrence and development, and we can consider the combination of BRAF inhibitors and immunotherapy in patients with BRAF mutant. The exploration of colorectal medullary carcinoma will arouse researchers' attention to the correlation between pathological subtypes and immune response, and promote the process of precise immunotherapy.

Mismatch repair deficiency as prognostic factor for stage III small bowel adenocarcinoma: A multicentric international study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare cancer with an aggressive behavior. No study has specifically addressed the putative prognostic role of mismatch repair status in stage III SBAs.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate whether mismatch repair deficiency is associated with cancer-specific survival in a Western cohort of patients with stage III SBAs.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentric international cohort study, we enrolled 70 patients who underwent surgically resection for stage III SBAs and we analyzed the frequency of mismatch repair deficiency, tested by immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins and by polymerase chain reaction for microsatellite instability, and its association with cancer-specific survival and other clinic-pathologic factors.

RESULTS

We found sixteen (23%) patients with mismatch repair deficient adenocarcinoma, without discordance between immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction for microsatellite instability analyses. Mismatch repair deficiency proved to be associated with a better outcome both at univariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.91, p: 0.035) and in bivariable models adjusted for patient age or gender, tumor site, pT4 stage, tumor budding, and perineural invasion.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of testing mismatch repair status to improve prognostic stratification in stage III SBAs.