Specific Antibody Deficiencies

Primary Immunodeficiency: Specific antibody deficiency with normal IgG

Specific antibody deficiency (SAD) is a common primary immunodeficiency disorder that should be considered in older children and adults with recurrent and/or severe sinopulmonary infections. The diagnosis is characterized by inadequate antibody response to polysaccharide vaccine, specifically, pneumococcal, with normal responses to protein antigens and normal levels of serum immunoglobulins as well as immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses. The underlying mechanism for SAD is not completely elucidated. It is understood that young children have limited polysaccharide responsiveness, which develops with increased age. Due to this phenomenon, the consensus is that there is adequate immune maturity after age 2 years, which is the earliest for the SAD diagnosis to be established. There remains a lack of consensus on thresholds for polysaccharide nonresponse, and there are several commercial laboratories that measure a range of serotypes, with the recommendation for patients to have their diagnostic evaluation with serotype testing both before vaccination and after vaccination to be conducted by the same laboratory. Once a diagnosis has been made, the management of SAD is based on the clinical severity. Clinicians may consider prophylactic antibiotics as well as immunoglobulin replacement. These patients should be closely followed up, with the possibility of discontinuation of IgG replacement after 12 to 24 months. Children are more likely to demonstrate resolution of SAD than are adolescents and adults. Patients with SAD may also progress to a more severe immunodeficiency; therefore, continued monitoring remains a crucial principle of practice in the care of patients with SAD.

Pneumococcal antibody response in children with recurrent respiratory tract infections: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The pneumococcal antibody response after vaccination with unconjugated pneumococcal vaccine can be evaluated as part of the diagnostic work-up of children with recurrent respiratory tract infections to detect an underlying polysaccharide antibody deficiency. Little is known about the prevalence of polysaccharide antibody deficiency in this population and its therapeutic consequences.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of polysaccharide antibody deficiency in children with recurrent respiratory tract infections and to correlate polysaccharide responsiveness with clinical severity. In addition, we aimed to evaluate differences in the immunoglobulin (Ig)G2/IgG ratio, IgA level, and age in relation to the number of deficient serotype-specific antibody responses.

METHODS

Polysaccharide antibody titers for pneumococcal serotypes 8, 9N, and 15B; clinical characteristics; and immunoglobulin levels of 103 children with recurrent respiratory tract infections were retrospectively assessed. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology guidelines were used for the interpretation of the polysaccharide antibody response.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 children (27.2 %) were diagnosed with polysaccharide antibody deficiency. No correlation was found between the number of deficient serotype-specific antibody responses and clinical severity. The study participants with a normal response to all three serotypes had a higher IgG2/IgG ratio than those with one or more deficient responses (p < 0.003). No significant correlation between IgA levels and polysaccharide responsiveness was found. The median age of children with normal polysaccharide responsiveness for the three tested serotypes was higher than that of children with a deficient response to one or more serotypes (p < 0.0025).

CONCLUSION

For a large group of children (18.4 %) with recurrent respiratory tract infections, an underlying mechanism for their susceptibility was defined thanks to diagnostic unconjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination. Further research is needed to formulate age-specific normal values for polysaccharide responsiveness and to investigate the usefulness of the IgG2/IgG ratio in determining the need for diagnostic unconjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination.

High Frequency of Specific Polysaccharide Antibody Deficiency in Adults With Unexplained, Recurrent and/or Severe Infections With Encapsulated Bacteria

BACKGROUND

Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in adults are mainly revealed by recurrent and/or severe bacterial infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate a systematic research strategy of PIDs in adults with unexplained bacterial infections, with a special focus on specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, inclusion criteria were recurrent benign upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) for at least two years (group 1), at least one upper or lower RTI requiring hospitalization (group 2), and/or at least one invasive infection documented with encapsulated bacteria (group 3). Main exclusion criteria were all local and general conditions that could explain infections. If no PID diagnosis was made, response to polysaccharide antigens was assessed using a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.

RESULTS

From March 2015 to March 2020, 118 patients were included (37 males, median age of 41 years): 73, 17, and 28 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Forty-seven PIDs were diagnosed, giving an estimated frequency of 39.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] [30.4, 48.8]). SPAD was the most frequent diagnosis by far (n = 37/47, 78.7%), and was made in 23, 5, and 9 patients from groups 1 to 3, respectively. All SPAD patients received conjugate vaccines and, according to their infectious history, were on surveillance or treated with preventive antibiotics (n = 6) and/or with immunoglobulins replacement therapy (n = 10), the latter being dramatically efficient in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering its high prevalence among adults with unexplained recurrent and/or severe bacterial infections, SPAD should be screened in those patients.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02972281.

Specific antibody deficiency to pneumococcal polysaccharide in a young adult with recurrent respiratory infections: a case report

Specific antibody deficiency against pneumococcal serotypes was detected in a patient with recurrent episodes of fever. A 21-year-old man presented with a two-month history of recurrent episodes of fever and shaking chills. He was diagnosed with recurrent episodes of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A and treated with amoxicillin. Serotype-specific antibodies were not produced against most of the serotypes, which were consistent with moderate specific antibody deficiency. After pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccination and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination, he adequately responded to the infecting serotype with an antibody titer of 1.1 µg/mL. There were eventually no recurrent episodes of fever with pneumonia.

Application of vaccine response in the evaluation of patients with suspected B-cell immunodeficiency: Assessment of responses and challenges with interpretation

Diagnostic vaccination is an integral component in the evaluation of patients suspected to have a B cell or humoral deficiency. Evaluation of antibody production in response to both protein- and polysaccharide-based vaccines aids in distinguishing between specific categories of humoral deficiency. Although assessment of pneumococcal polysaccharide responses is widely available and included in diagnostic guidelines, significant variability still exists in the measurement and interpretation of these responses. Interpretation can also be complicated by age, vaccination history and treatment with immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Despite the challenges and limitations of evaluating pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine responses, it can provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information to guide therapeutic intervention. Future efforts are needed to further standardize measurement and interpretation of pneumococcal antibody responses to vaccination and to identify and establish other methods and/or vaccines as alternatives to pneumococcal vaccination to address the challenges in certain patient populations.

Evaluation of Specific Antibody Responses in Patients with Selective IgA Deficiency and Ataxia Telangiectasia

BACKGROUND

Specific Antibody Deficiency (SAD) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) characterized by the occurrence of recurrent infections and inadequate antibody response to polysaccharide new antigens.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the titer of specific antibodies against unconjugated 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV-23), the presence of SAD, and its association with clinical and laboratory findings in Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD) patients.

METHODS

32 A-T patients and 43 SIgAD patients were included in the study. Samples of the patients were obtained before and three weeks after vaccination with PPSV-23. Specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed towards pneumococcal capsular antigen and specific antibodies against whole pneumococcal antigens was measured.

RESULTS

Comparison of the response to vaccination revealed that 81.3% of A-T patients and 18.6% of the SIgAD patients had an inadequate response to PPSV-23 (p<0.001). The prevalence of recurrent infection (p=0.034) and pneumonia (p=0.003) in SIgAD patients was significantly higher in non-responders than responders. Likewise, the number of marginal zone B cells (p=0.037), transitional B cells (p=0.019), plasmablasts (p=0.019), CD8+ naïve T cells (p=0.036), and percentage of CD8+ T cells (p=0.047), switched memory B cells (SMB) (p=0.026) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) memory B cells (p=0.022) in SIgAD patients were significantly lower in non-responder group than responder group. In contrast, the percentage of CD4 T+ cells in A-T patients was lower in the non-responder group than responders (p=0.035).

CONCLUSION

SAD is more frequent in A-T patients than SIgAD patients. The role of SMB and T cells should not be underestimated in SAD.

Vaccination in PADs

Primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) are the most common primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs). They can be divided into the following groups, depending on their immunological features: agammaglobulinemia; common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) isotype; hyper IgM isotype; light chain or functional deficiencies with normal B cell count; specific antibody deficiency with normal Ig concentrations and normal numbers of B cells and transient hypogammaglobulinemia of infancy. The role of vaccination in PADs is recognized as therapeutic, diagnostic and prognostic and may be used in patients with residual B-cell function to provide humoral immunity to specific infective agents. According to their content and mechanisms, vaccines are grouped as live attenuated, inactivated (conjugated, polysaccharide), mRNA or replication-deficient vector vaccines. Vaccination may be unsafe or less effective when using certain vaccines and in specific types of immunodeficiency. Inactivated vaccines can be administered in PAD patients even if they could not generate a protective response; live attenuated vaccines are not recommended in major antibody deficiencies. From December 2020, European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved vaccines against COVID-19 infection: according to ESID advises, those vaccinations are recommended in patients with PADs. No specific data are available on safety and efficacy in PAD patients.

Comparison of management options for specific antibody deficiency

Background: Specific antibody deficiency is a primary immunodeficiency characterized by normal immunoglobulins with an inadequate response to polysaccharide antigen vaccination. This disease can result in recurrent infections, the most common being sinopulmonary infections. Treatment options include clinical observation, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and immunoglobulin supplementation therapy, each with limited clinical data about their efficacy. Objective: This study aimed to identify whether there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of infections for patients who were managed with clinical observation, prophylactic antibiotics, or immunoglobulin supplementation therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients were eligible for the study if they had normal immunoglobulin levels, an inadequate antibody response to polysaccharide antigen-based vaccination, and no other known causes of immunodeficiency. Results: A total of 26 patients with specific antibody deficiency were identified. Eleven patients were managed with immunoglobulin supplementation, ten with clinical observation, and five with prophylactic antibiotic therapy. The frequency of antibiotic prescriptions was assessed for the first year after intervention. A statistically significant rate of decreased antibiotic prescriptions after intervention was found for patients treated with immunoglobulin supplementation (n = 11; p = 0.0004) and for patients on prophylactic antibiotics (n = 5; p = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in antibiotic prescriptions for those patients treated with immunoglobulin supplementation versus prophylactic antibiotics (p = 0.21). Conclusion: Prophylactic antibiotics seemed to be equally effective as immunoglobin supplementation therapy for the treatment of specific antibody deficiency. Further studies are needed in this area.

Specific Antibody Deficiency in Adult Patients With IgG or IgG Subclass Deficiency

Purpose

Specific antibody deficiency (SAD) involves a deficient response to a polysaccharide vaccine despite having normal immunoglobulin levels. The failure of the polysaccharide response can be observed as a component of various primary antibody deficiencies. However, only a few studies have described the clinical and immunological profiles in SAD and/or other primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in adults.

Methods

A total of 47 patients who had a clinical history suggestive of antibody deficiency or had already been diagnosed with various antibody deficiencies were enrolled. Polysaccharide responses to 7 pneumococcal serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F) were measured using the World Health Organization enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (WHO-ELISA), and postvaccination immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers were compared to clinical and laboratory parameters.

Results

Based on the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) criteria for the WHO-ELISA, 11 (23.4%) patients were diagnosed as having SAD. Sixteen-three percent of them had combined with other types of PID, such as IgG subclass deficiency and hypogammaglobulinemia. Postvaccination IgG titers for the serotypes 4/9V/18C correlated with IgG2 (P = 0.012, P = 0.001, and P = 0.004) and for 6B/9V/14 with IgG3 (P = 0.003, P = 0.041, and P = 0.036, respectively). The IgG3 subclass levels negatively correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, %) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

SAD can be diagnosed in patients with normal IgG levels as well as in those deficient in IgG or the IgG3 subclass, implicating that restricted responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae polysaccharide antigens commonly exist in patients with predominantly antibody deficiency.

Unique repertoire of anti-carbohydrate antibodies in individual human serum

Humoral immunity to pathogens and other environmental challenges is paramount to maintain normal health, and individuals lacking or unable to make antibodies are at risk. Recent studies indicate that many human protective antibodies are against carbohydrate antigens; however, little is known about repertoires and individual variation of anti-carbohydrate antibodies in healthy individuals. Here we analyzed anti-carbohydrate antibody repertoires (ACARs) of 105 healthy individual adult donors, aged 20-60+ from different ethnic backgrounds to explore variations in antibodies, as defined by binding to glycan microarrays and by affinity purification. Using microarrays that contained > 1,000 glycans, including antigens from animal cells and microbes, we profiled the IgG and IgM ACARs from all donors. Each donor expressed many ACAs, but had a relatively unique ACAR, which included unanticipated antibodies to carbohydrate antigens not well studied, such as chitin oligosaccharides, Forssman-related antigens, globo-type antigens, and bacterial glycans. We also saw some expected antibodies to ABO(H) blood group and α-Gal-type antigens, although these also varied among individuals. Analysis suggests differences in ACARs are associated with ethnicity and age. Thus, each individual ACAR is relatively unique, suggesting that individualized information could be useful in precision medicine for predicting and monitoring immune health and resistance to disease.

Diagnosis and management of Specific Antibody Deficiency

Specific antibody deficiency is a primary immunodeficiency disease recognized by the International Union of Immunology Societies and defined by recurrent respiratory infections with normal immunoglobulins, but diminished antibody responses to polysaccharide antigens after vaccination with the 23 valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Clinical immunologists struggle with diagnosis and treatment, because the definition of an adequate response to immunization remains controversial. Specific antibody deficiency is managed clinically with close follow-up and prompt treatment of infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, or immune globulin therapy. Treatment is individualized using clinical judgment and existing practice guidelines, which will likely evolve as more studies become available.

Specific Antibody Deficiencies in Clinical Practice

Specific antibody deficiency (SAD) is defined as the inability to mount an antibody response to purified Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide antigens in the presence of normal immunoglobulin concentrations and normal antibody responses to protein antigens. In this review, we discuss the difficulties in using presently available testing methods to adequately define SAD. The fact that there are different forms of SADs to pneumococcal surface polysaccharides is detailed. The diagnostic and therapeutic implications of recognizing that, in addition to SAD, there are other forms of SAD in the response to S. pneumoniae polysaccharides are described in detail. The conclusion of this review is that assessment of immunity and therapeutic actions to deal with SADs need to be based on clinical evidence rather than solely on arbitrarily defined antibody responses.

The broad spectrum of lung diseases in primary antibody deficiencies

Human primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) represent a heterogeneous group of more than 350 disorders. They are rare diseases, but their global incidence is more relevant than generally thought. The underlying defect may involve different branches of the innate and/or adaptive immune response. Thus, the clinical picture may range from severe phenotypes characterised by a broad spectrum of infections to milder infectious phenotypes due to more selective (and frequent) immune defects. Moreover, infections may not be the main clinical features in some PIDs that might present with autoimmunity, auto-inflammation and/or cancer. Primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) represent a small percentage of the known PIDs but they are the most frequently diagnosed, particularly in adulthood. Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most prevalent symptomatic PAD.

PAD patients share a significant susceptibility to respiratory diseases that represent a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary complications include acute and chronic infection-related diseases, such as pneumonia and bronchiectasis. They also include immune-mediated interstitial lung diseases, such as granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) and cancer. Herein we will discuss the main pulmonary manifestations of PADs, the associated functional and imaging findings, and the relevant role of pulmonologists and chest radiologists in diagnosis and surveillance.

The spectrum of lung complications in primary antibody deficiency ranges from asthma or COPD to extremely rare and specific ILDs. Early diagnosis of the underlying immune defect might significantly improve patients' lung disease, QoL and long-term prognosis.http://ow.ly/5cP230kZvOB

Specific Polysaccharide Antibody Deficiency Revealed by Severe Bacterial Infections in Adulthood: A Report on 11 Cases

We report on 11 cases of specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD) revealed in adulthood by severe infections with encapsulated bacteria. Given that immunoglobulin replacement therapy can effectively prevent the recurrence of bacterial infections in this context, SPAD should be considered once other antibody deficiencies have been ruled out.

Prescribing Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy for Patients with Non-classical and Secondary Antibody Deficiency: an Analysis of the Practice of Clinical Immunologists in the UK and Republic of Ireland

Background

Immunologists are increasingly being asked to assess patients with non-classical and secondary antibody deficiency to determine their potential need for immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT). Immunoglobulin is a limited, expensive resource and no clear guidance exists for this broad patient group. The purpose of this survey is to establish what factors influence the decision to commence IGRT in adult patients, when diagnostic criteria for primary antibody deficiency are not fulfilled.

Methods

Under the auspices of the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN), a study group was established which circulated an online questionnaire to the consultant body across the UK and Ireland. Results provided a snapshot of the current clinical practice of 71% of consultant immunologists, from 30 centers.

Results

In order of importance, factors which influence the decision to commence IGRT include number of hospital admissions with infection, serum IgG level, bronchiectasis, radiologically proven pneumonia, number of positive sputum cultures, number of antibiotic courses, and results of immunization studies. The commonest test vaccine used was Pneumovax 23 with measurement of serotype-specific responses at 4 weeks, with a threshold of 0.35 μg/ml in 2/3 of serotypes measured. Eighty-six percent of patients are treated with a trial of prophylactic antibiotics prior to consideration of IGRT. Efficacy of IGRT trial is assessed at between 6 and 12 months.

Conclusions

There was consistency in clinical practice using a combination of clinical history, evidence of infections, and vaccination testing for diagnosis. However, there was some variation in the implementation of this practice, particularly in vaccine choice and assessment of response to vaccination.

Specific Antibody Deficiency: Controversies in Diagnosis and Management

Specific antibody deficiency (SAD) is a primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by normal immunoglobulins (Igs), IgA, IgM, total IgG, and IgG subclass levels, but with recurrent infection and diminished antibody responses to polysaccharide antigens following vaccination. There is a lack of consensus regarding the diagnosis and treatment of SAD, and its clinical significance is not well understood. Here, we discuss current evidence and challenges regarding the diagnosis and treatment of SAD. SAD is normally diagnosed by determining protective titers in response to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. However, the definition of an adequate response to immunization remains controversial, including the magnitude of response and number of pneumococcal serotypes needed to determine a normal response. Confounding these issues, anti-polysaccharide antibody responses are age- and probably serotype dependent. Therapeutic strategies and options for patients with SAD are often based on clinical experience due to the lack of focused studies and absence of a robust case definition. The mainstay of therapy for patients with SAD is antibiotic prophylaxis. However, there is no consensus regarding the frequency and severity of infections warranting antibiotic prophylaxis and no standardized regimens and no studies of efficacy. Published expert guidelines and opinions have recommended IgG therapy, which are supported by observations from retrospective studies, although definitive data are lacking. In summary, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of therapeutic strategies for patients with SAD. We believe that it is best to approach each patient as an individual and progress through diagnostic and therapeutic interventions together with existing practice guidelines.

Fifth Percentile Cutoff Values for Antipneumococcal Polysaccharide and Anti-Salmonella typhi Vi IgG Describe a Normal Polysaccharide Response

Background

Serotype-specific antibody responses to unconjugated pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) evaluated by a World Health Organization (WHO)-standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are the gold standard for diagnosis of specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SAD). The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) has proposed guidelines to interpret the PPV response measured by ELISA, but these are based on limited evidence. Additionally, ELISA is costly and labor-intensive. Measurement of antibody response to Salmonella typhi (S. typhi) Vi vaccine and serum allohemagglutinins (AHA) have been suggested as alternatives. However, there are no large cohort studies and cutoff values are lacking.

Objective

To establish cutoff values for antipneumococcal polysaccharide antibody response, anti-S. typhi Vi antibody, and AHA.

Methods

One hundred healthy subjects (10–55 years) were vaccinated with PPV and S. typhi Vi vaccine. Blood samples were obtained prior to and 3–4 weeks after vaccination. Polysaccharide responses to 3 serotypes were measured by WHO ELISA and to 12 serotypes by an in-house bead-based multiplex assay. Anti-S. typhi Vi IgG were measured with a commercial ELISA kit. AHA were measured by agglutination method.

Results

Applying AAAAI criteria, 30% of healthy subjects had a SAD. Using serotype-specific fifth percentile (p5) cutoff values for postvaccination IgG and fold increase pre- over postvaccination, only 4% of subjects had SAD. One-sided 95% prediction intervals for anti-S. typhi Vi postvaccination IgG (≥11.2 U/ml) and fold increase (≥2) were established. Eight percent had a response to S. typhi Vi vaccine below these cutoffs. AHA titer p5 cutoffs were ½ for anti-B and ¼ for anti-A.

Conclusion

We establish reference cutoff values for interpretation of PPV response measured by bead-based assay, cutoff values for S. typhi Vi vaccine responses, and normal values for AHA. For the first time, the intraindividual consistency of all three methods is studied in a large cohort.

Disease burden for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases identified at reference hospitals in Guanajuato, Mexico

Background

In addition to the deleterious effect on health, there is considerable economic and psychosocial morbidity associated with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). Also, the cost of a late diagnosis frequently results in a heavy disease burden on the patient. The objective of this study was to collect and analyze data on patients with PID in the state of Guanajuato in Mexico, to indirectly estimate the burden of the disease.

Methods

An observational, longitudinal, and comparative study was conducted. A total of 44 patients were included and grouped according to the updated classification of PID.

Results

The median time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the reference and diagnosis by a tertiary hospital was of 2.17 (IQR = 6.44) years. Before diagnosis, the number of hospitalizations/year per patient was 0.86 (IQR = 2.28), the number of visit to emergency room/year per patient was 0.92 (IQR = 1.77), the number of doctor’s visits/year per patient was 15 (IQR = 11.25), whereas the school/work absence days per patient were reported in 52.72 (IQR = 56.35) days per year. After diagnosis, 20 patients (45.45%) received IVIG replacement therapy, and all of them presented a significant improvement (p <0.05) in all the mentioned variables. Characteristically, even when patients with PID received IVIG, there was still an important disease burden when comparing them against healthy controls. Complications secondary to PID were detected in 19 patients (43.18%). The reported overall mortality rate was 6.82% (n = 3).

Conclusions

We were able to indirectly estimate an important disease burden in patients with PID; which is considered to be preventable, at least in part, with effective interventions like health planning, research, collaboration with primary care providers, and generation of policies and practices, in order to improve the quality of life and care of families with PID.

When to initiate immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) in antibody deficiency: a practical approach

Primary antibody deficiencies (PAD) constitute the majority of all primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) and immunoglobulin replacement forms the mainstay of therapy for many patients in this category. Secondary antibody deficiencies (SAD) represent a larger and expanding number of patients resulting from the use of a wide range of immunosuppressive therapies, in particular those targeting B cells, and may also result from renal or gastrointestinal immunoglobulin losses. While there are clear similarities between primary and secondary antibody deficiencies, there are also significant differences. This review describes a practical approach to the clinical, laboratory and radiological assessment of patients with antibody deficiency, focusing on the factors that determine whether or not immunoglobulin replacement should be used. The decision to treat is more straightforward when defined diagnostic criteria for some of the major PADs, such as common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) or X-linked agammaglobulinaemia (XLA), are fulfilled or, indeed, when there is a very low level of immunoglobulin production in association with an increased frequency of severe or recurrent infections in SAD. However, the presentation of many patients is less clear-cut and represents a considerable challenge in terms of the decision whether or not to treat and the best way in which to assess the outcome of therapy. This decision is important, not least to improve individual quality of life and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with recurrent infections but also to avoid inappropriate exposure to blood products and to ensure that immunoglobulin, a costly and limited resource, is used to maximal benefit.

Lung Disease in Primary Antibody Deficiencies

Primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) are the most common form of primary immunodeficiency and predispose to severe and recurrent pulmonary infections, which can result in chronic lung disease including bronchiectasis. Chronic lung disease is among the most common complications of PAD and a significant source of morbidity and mortality for these patients. However, the development of lung disease in PAD may not be solely the result of recurrent bacterial infection or a consequence of bronchiectasis. Recent characterization of monogenic immune dysregulation disorders and more extensive study of common variable immunodeficiency have demonstrated that interstitial lung disease (ILD) in PAD can result from generalized immune dysregulation and frequently occurs in the absence of pneumonia history or bronchiectasis. This distinction between bronchiectasis and ILD has important consequences in the evaluation and management of lung disease in PAD. For example, treatment of ILD in PAD typically uses immunomodulatory approaches in addition to immunoglobulin replacement and antibiotic prophylaxis, which are the stalwarts of bronchiectasis management in these patients. Although all antibody-deficient patients are at risk of developing bronchiectasis, ILD occurs in some forms of PAD much more commonly than in others, suggesting that distinct but poorly understood immunological factors underlie the development of this complication. Importantly, ILD can have earlier onset and may worsen survival more than bronchiectasis. Further efforts to understand the pathogenesis of lung disease in PAD will provide vital information for the most effective methods of diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of these patients.