1
|
Flory S, Hviid-Vyff B, Šošić L, Schmid JM, Ahlbeck L, Widmer ECJ, Lang CCV, Ikenberg K, Kündig TM, Hoffmann HJ, Johansen P. How to hit the allergy target: A critical appraisal of intralymphatic immunotherapy with practical recommendations on ultrasound-guided injections. Allergy 2024. [PMID: 38712754 DOI: 10.1111/all.16138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) represents a promising novel approach treating allergic diseases. However, no standardized procedures or recommendations have been established or reported, despite the recognized fact that treatment efficacy relies on the ability to inject the allergen intranodally. OBJECTIVE We aim to provide a critical appraisal of ILIT as a method of allergen immunotherapy and to deliver practical recommendations for accurate ILIT. METHODS One hundred and seventy-three ILIT injections were performed in 28 (47%) women and 32 (53%) men with median age of 29 years (21-59). The injections were ultrasound-guided and recorded for retrospective analysis with respect to injection location, needle visibility, medication release, and patient characteristics. RESULTS The results show that the correct positioning of the needle within the lymph node (LN) was most critical. If the whole length of the needle bevel was not inserted into the LN, substance backflush into the interstitium was observed. Selecting a more superficial LN and inserting the needle at a smaller angle towards the LN significantly improved needle visibility in the ultrasound. Longitudinal results showed that continuous practice significantly correlated with improved needle visibility and more accurate ILIT injections. CONCLUSION Based on our results and practical experience, we propose several recommendations for LN selection and the correct handling of ultrasound probe and needle. We are confident that ILIT standardization and training will be important as to meet the goals of good safety and efficacy of ILIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Flory
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Lara Šošić
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Ahlbeck
- Allergy Center, University Hospital Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Emma C J Widmer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia C V Lang
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kristian Ikenberg
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antón M, Cabañes N, Fernández-Meléndez S, Fernández-Nieto M, Jiménez-Ferrera G, Letrán A, Méndez-Brea P, Montoro J, Moreno F, Mur-Gimeno P, Rodríguez-Vázquez V, Rosado A, Sánchez-Guerrero I, Vega-Chicote JM, Vidal C. Shared Decision-Making in Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) Options Using a Questionnaire for Respiratory Allergic Patients: A Delphi Consensus Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:1771-1782. [PMID: 37520065 PMCID: PMC10378527 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s409466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire, through a Delphi consensus, to be used by allergists in their routine clinical practice to assess the preferences of patients starting allergen immunotherapy (AIT) treatment using an objective approach. Patients and Methods A Delphi consensus-driven process was used. The scientific committee, composed of 15 allergists, led the study and participated in the preparation of the questionnaire. Two-hundred panelists from different Spanish regions were invited to complete a 16-item questionnaire on a nine-point Likert scale covering six topic blocks. Consensus was achieved if ≥66.6% of panelists reached agreement or disagreement. Results Of the 200 experts invited to participate in the Delphi process, a total of 195 (97.5%) answered the questionnaire. The panel experts reached a consensus on "agreement" on a total of 12 of the 16 (75.0%) items, covering a total of six categories: (a) patient knowledge (2 questions), (b) barriers to patient adherence (3 questions), (c) patient behavior (4 questions), (d) future actions (3 questions), (e) treatment costs (2 questions), and (f) final patient preferences (2 questions). Conclusion This Delphi consensus study validated a set of twelve recommended questions for patients objectively assessing their preferences and suitability for the most common AIT options available. The questionnaire intends to assist allergists in making an objective, unconditioned decision regarding the best AIT option for each patient, after informing them about the different routes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Antón
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Nieves Cabañes
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | | | - Mar Fernández-Nieto
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Letrán
- Allergy Unit, Centro médico Asisa Doctor Lobatón, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Paula Méndez-Brea
- Allergy Department, Complejo Hospitalario Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Javier Montoro
- Allergy Department, Hospital de Llíria, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Mur-Gimeno
- Allergy Department, Hospital de Santa Bárbara, Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Virginia Rodríguez-Vázquez
- Allergy Department, Complejo Hospitalario Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Rosado
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Vidal
- Allergy Department, Complejo Hospitalario Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdul Latiff AH, Husain S, Abdullah B, Suppiah P, Tan V, Ing Ping T, Woo K, Yap YY, Bachert C, J Schunemann H, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Bousquet J. ARIA Care Pathways 2019: Next-Generation Allergic Rhinitis Care and Allergen Immunotherapy in Malaysia. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050835. [PMID: 37241005 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
An increase in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) worldwide presents a significant burden to the health care system. An initiative was started in Europe designated as Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) to develop internationally applicable guidelines by utilising an evidence-based approach to address this crucial issue. The efforts are directed at empowerment of patients for self-management, the use of digital mobile technology to complement and personalise treatment, and establishment of real-life integrated care pathways (ICPs). This guideline includes aspects of patients' and health care providers' management and covers the main areas of treatment for AR. The model provides better real-life health care than the previous traditional models. This review summarises the ARIA next-generation guideline in the context of the Malaysian health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff
- Allergy & Immunology Centre, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Bukit Pantai, Taman Bukit Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia
| | - Salina Husain
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
| | - Baharudin Abdullah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
| | - Palaniappan Suppiah
- Otorhinolaryngology, Gleneagles Hospital Penang, 1, Jalan Pangkor, George Town 10050, Malaysia
| | - Vincent Tan
- Otorhinolaryngology, KPJ Klang Specialist Hospital, Persiaran Rajawali, Bandar Baru Klang, Klang 41150, Malaysia
| | - Tang Ing Ping
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
| | - Kent Woo
- Allergy & Immunology Clinic, Gleneagles Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Ampang, Kampung Berembang, Kuala Lumpur 50450, Malaysia
| | - Yoke-Yeow Yap
- Otorhinolaryngology, KPJ Johor Specialist Hospital, 39B Jalan Abdul Samad, Johor Bahru 80100, Malaysia
| | - Claus Bachert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- International Airway Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Holger J Schunemann
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
| | | | - Wienczyslawa Czarlewski
- ARIA & MASK-air, 34090 Montpellier, France
- Medical Consulting Czarlewski, 92300 Levallois, France
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- University Hospital of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
- Inserm Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, 94807 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adlany YK, Šošić L, Senti G, Lang CC, Wüthrich B, Kündig TM, Johansen P. Quality of life in allergic rhinitis patients treated with intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT): A 19-year follow-up. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. GLOBAL 2023; 2:43-50. [PMID: 37780115 PMCID: PMC10509981 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Background In 2002-2005, we conducted a phase I/II clinical trial where a new allergy immunotherapy (AIT) route was introduced: intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). Ultrasound guidance allowed injection of allergen directly into inguinal lymph nodes. Grass pollen-allergic patients received 3 injections with 1-month intervals. The short ILIT was more patient-friendly, required lower dosing, and was comparable with SCIT regarding short-term efficacy, which was used as a reference. Objective Nineteen years after ILIT, the same patients were followed up to assess the long-term effect on quality of life and efficacy of the treatment. Methods Patients who received ILIT and SCIT in 2002-2005 and an additional group of patients, who completed SCIT in 2015-2018, were recruited. All participants received a trial-specific in-house questionnaire and a standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Data were recorded off- (February 2021) and on- (May-June 2021) season. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results Of 58 and 54 patients who originally received ILIT or SCIT, 25 (43%) and 29 (54%) patients, respectively, returned the questionnaires for analysis. Four (16%) and 3 (11%) of the ILIT and SCIT patients, respectively, developed complete protection against grass pollen-mediated rhinitis, whereas another 15 (60%) and 20 (69%) expressed satisfaction with the received AIT. In both groups, any persistent symptoms were reported as mild. Medication usage in the ILIT and SCIT groups was comparable. Nineteen (76%) and 23 (79%) patients, respectively, expressed satisfaction with their AIT. Conclusions Grass pollen ILIT leads to long-term significant improvement in rhinitis-associated quality of life 19 years after treatment, and the ILIT quality-of-life effect was not inferior to that of SCIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin K. Adlany
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lara Šošić
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Senti
- University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia C.V. Lang
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brunello Wüthrich
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M. Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koca Kalkan I, Ates H, Aksu K, Yesilkaya S, Topel M, Cuhadar Ercelebi D, Turkyilmaz S, Oncul A, Demir S. Real-life adherence to subcutaneous immunotherapy: What has changed in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100558. [PMID: 34122718 PMCID: PMC8185179 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) must be continued for 3 years, to achieve a long-term modifying effect. Adherence is a key to ensure effectiveness. The objective of this study was, first of all, to evaluate the adherence with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and to identify the main causes of SCIT withdrawal in real-life practice in our clinic. Secondly, we also aimed to investigate to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic altered our SCIT receiving patients' treatment adherence behaviors and the factors that affected their decisions. METHODS Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients ages ≥18 years, who had started SCIT in January 2014 or later until September 2020 in our department for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma or venom allergy, were included in the study. Adherence was determined as the accomplishment of 3 years of SCIT. RESULTS A total of 124 patients (72 female [58.1%]; median age, 35 [19-77] years) were included. The adherence rate to SCIT in our tertiary center's real-life setting was 56.25% with a follow-up duration of 3 years before COVID-19 pandemic. Dose modification, defined as reducing patient's planned SCIT dose due to a systemic allergic/large local reaction or missed injection, and its frequency, which is the number of dose adjustments done throughout the SCIT, was found to be the only factor related to nonadherence. But with the pandemic only in 6 months, among 63 patients receiving SCIT, 15 patients (23.81%) dropped out, and the most common reason was fear of being infected with COVID-19 virus during receiving SCIT in hospital (93.33%). The only independent predictor of drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic was short duration of AIT (p = 0.012). When we compare the dropped-out cases before and after the start of pandemic, AIT duration was significantly shorter in pandemic period (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Adherence rate to SCIT in our real-world setting study was 56.25% before the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicated that patients requiring dose modification were more prone to be non-adherent. Approximately one quarter of patients dropped-out with the start of pandemic, almost all due to fear of being infected during receiving SCIT in hospital. Since short SCIT follow-up time was found to be the only risk factor for drop-out during the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that patients who are in the early phases of their treatment should be observed more closely and their concerns should be answered by their doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilkay Koca Kalkan
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hale Ates
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kurtulus Aksu
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selma Yesilkaya
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Topel
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dilek Cuhadar Ercelebi
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Suleyman Turkyilmaz
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Oncul
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Senay Demir
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoang MP, Seresirikachorn K, Chitsuthipakorn W, Snidvongs K. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology 2021; 59:236-244. [PMID: 33647073 DOI: 10.4193/rhin20.572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is a new route of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Data confirming its effect is restricted to a small number of studies. METHODOLOGY A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The short-term (less than 24 weeks), medium-term (24-52 weeks), and long-term (more than 52 weeks) effects of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) were assessed. The outcomes were combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), symptoms visual analog scale (VAS), disease-specific quality of life (QOL), specific IgG4 level, specific IgE level, and adverse events. RESULTS Eleven randomized controlled trials and 2 cohorts (483 participants) were included. Compared with placebo, short term benefits of ILIT for seasonal ARC improved CSMS, improved VAS and increased specific IgG4 level but did not change QOL or specific IgE level. Medium-term effect improved VAS. Data on the long-term benefit of ILIT remain unavailable and require longer term follow-up studies. There were no clinical benefits of ILIT for perennial ARC. ILIT was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION ILIT showed short-term benefits for seasonal ARC. The sustained effects of ILIT were inconclusive. It was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Hoang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Endoscopic Nasal and Sinus Surgery Excellent Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Otolaryngology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam
| | - K Seresirikachorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Endoscopic Nasal and Sinus Surgery Excellent Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - W Chitsuthipakorn
- Center of Excellence in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - K Snidvongs
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Endoscopic Nasal and Sinus Surgery Excellent Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lamb CC, Wang Y. PHYSICIAN CHARACTERISTICS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2280-2289. [PMID: 32475713 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is recommended to improve healthcare quality. Physicians who use a rational decision-making style and patient-centric approach are more likely to incorporate SDM into clinical practice. This paper explores how certain physician characteristics such as gender, age, race, experience, and specialty explain patient participation. METHODS A multi-group structural equation model tested the relationship between physician decision-making styles, patient-centered care, physician characteristics, and patient participation in clinical treatment decisions. A survey was completed by 330 physicians who treat primary immunodeficiency. Sample group responses were compared between groups across specialty, age, race, experience, or gender. RESULTS A patient-centric approach was the main factor that encouraged SDM independent of physician decision-making style with both treatment protocols and product choices. The positive effect of patient-centrism is stronger for immunologists, more experienced physicians, or male physicians. A rational decision-making style increases participation for non-immunologists, older physicians, white physicians, less-experienced physicians and female physicians. CONCLUSION A patient-centric approach, rational decision-making and certain physician characteristics help explain patient participation in clinical decisions. Practice Implications Future SDM research and policy initiatives should focus on physician adoption of patient-centric approaches to chronic care diseases and the potential bias associated with physician characteristics and decision-making style.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Lamb
- BioSolutions Services, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, United States; Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Silberman College of Business, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey, United States; Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - Yunmei Wang
- Case Cardiovascular Research Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and Harrington Heart &Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Al-Ahmad M, Nurkic J, Bachert C, Pfaar O, Schunemann HJ, Czarlewski W, Bedbrook A, Bosquet J. ARIA 2019 Care Pathways for Allergic Rhinitis in the Kuwait Health Care System. Med Princ Pract 2020; 30:320-330. [PMID: 33099546 PMCID: PMC8436665 DOI: 10.1159/000512493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A worldwide increase in prevalence of allergic diseases has led to adaptations in national and international health care systems. ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma) initiative develops internationally applicable guidelines for allergic respiratory diseases. In collaboration with international initiatives, ARIA offers updates of real-life integrated care pathways (ICPs) for digitally assisted, integrated, and individualized treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). This article presents certain aspects of the health care system in Kuwait with reference to the management of AR and the objective of introducing ICPs and adopting the latest ARIA recommendations. Guidelines for ICPs include aspects of patients and health care providers and cover key areas of management of AR. This model of guidelines supports real-life health care better than traditional models. ARIA recommendations will be locally integrated in the health care system with the aim of improving both pharmacotherapy and allergy immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait,
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait,
| | - Jasmina Nurkic
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory and Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Holger J Schunemann
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean Bosquet
- Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif en France, Montpellier, France
- INSERM, Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health, Paris, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Steven GC. Shared decision making in allergic rhinitis: An approach to the patient. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 125:268-272. [PMID: 32615266 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review what is known about the importance of shared decision making (SDM) in allergic rhinitis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and PubMed database searches for SDM, patient preferences, patient motivation with mobile apps, over-the-counter medications, adherence, complementary and alternative therapies, nasal steroids, and immunotherapy. STUDY SELECTIONS No articles directly dealt with the effects of SDM on outcomes in allergic rhinitis. Thus, of the 77 articles produced by these searches, 41 were selected based on the information relevant to evaluating the need for SDM in these patients. RESULTS Poorly controlled allergic rhinitis continues to be associated with substantial morbidity. Complicating the effective control of the disease is the tendency of patients to self-manage using information from a variety of sources other than health care providers. Although direct evidence in allergic rhinitis is lacking, controlled trials have found the benefits of SDM in improving adherence and outcomes in at least 50 other disease states. Thus, this review explores the aspects of the disease that are complicated by poor adherence, establishing the case for the need for widespread use of SDM techniques. CONCLUSION Patients are confronted with a complex array of treatment options for allergic rhinitis, and a consistent SDM approach can better equip them to make the requisite care decisions needed to achieve optimal control. Furthermore, improving patient education through SDM provides a framework that enables long-term adherence for maximal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C Steven
- Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Center, Greenfield, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yorgancıoğlu AA, Gemicioğlu B, Cingi C, Kalaycı Ö, Kalyoncu AF, Bachert C, Hellings P, Pfaar O, Schünemann HJ, Wallace D, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Bousquet J. ARIA 2019, Allerjik Rinite Tedavi Yaklaşımı-Türkiye. Turk Thorac J 2020; 21:122-133. [PMID: 32203003 DOI: 10.5152/turkthoracj.2019.19084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Gerçek yaşamda, çevresel maruziyetlerin de etkilediği rinit ve astım mültimorbidite durumlarında, dijitalleşmiş ve kişiye odaklanan tedaviler için bütünleştirilmiş tedavi yollarının değerlendirilmesi önerilmektedir. Gerçek yaşamdaki bu durum mültisipliner bir yaklaşımla basamaklandırılıp, rehberilerinde ülkelerdeki gereksinimlere göre değiştilmesini gerektirebilir. Allerjik rinitte hem farmakoterapi hem immünoterapi açısından acil yeni yaklaşımlara ihtiyaç olduğu görülmüştür. 3. Aralık 2018'de Paris'te bir toplantı yapılmış ve iki ayrı belge hazırlanmıştır. Bu yayında bunlara ait bir özet sunulup, ülkeye ve sağlık sistemine uygun kullanımın çerçevesi oluşturulmak istenmiştir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bilun Gemicioğlu
- Department of Chest Diseases, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Cemal Cingi
- Department of Ear Nose Throat, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey
| | - Ömer Kalaycı
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Fuat Kalyoncu
- Department of Chest Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Dept, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, and Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Euforea, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Phillipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
ARIA guideline 2019: treatment of allergic rhinitis in the German health system. Allergol Select 2019; 3:22-50. [PMID: 32176226 PMCID: PMC7066682 DOI: 10.5414/alx02120e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The number of patients affected by allergies is increasing worldwide. The resulting allergic diseases are leading to significant costs for health care and social systems. Integrated care pathways are needed to enable comprehensive care within the national health systems. The ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) initiative develops internationally applicable guidelines for allergic respiratory diseases. Methods: ARIA serves to improve the care of patients with allergies and chronic respiratory diseases. In collaboration with other international initiatives, national associations and patient organizations in the field of allergies and respiratory diseases, real-life integrated care pathways have been developed for a digitally assisted, integrative, individualized treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) with comorbid asthma. In the present work, these integrated care pathways have been adapted to the German situation and health system. Results: The present ICP (integrated care pathway) guideline covers key areas of the care of AR patients with and without asthma. It includes the views of patients and other healthcare providers. Discussion: A comprehensive ICP guideline can reflect real-life care better than traditional guideline models.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Togias A, Schünemann HJ, Ansotegui I, Papadopoulos NG, Tsiligianni I, Agache I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Bedbrook A, Bergmann K, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brozek J, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chu D, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham SR, Du Toit G, Dykewicz M, Ebisawa M, Fauquert JL, Fernandez‐Rivas M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca J, Fontaine J, Gerth van Wijk R, Haahtela T, Halken S, Hellings PW, Ierodiakonou D, Iinuma T, Ivancevich JC, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kalayci O, Kleine Tebbe J, Klimek L, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, La Grutta S, Larenas‐Linemann D, Lau S, Laune D, Le L, Lodrup Carlsen K, Lourenço O, Malling H, Marien G, Menditto E, Mercier G, Mullol J, Muraro A, O’Hehir R, Okamoto Y, Pajno GB, Park H, Panzner P, Passalacqua G, Pham‐Thi N, Roberts G, Pawankar R, Rolland C, Rosario N, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez‐Borges M, Scadding G, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Sturm GJ, Todo Bom A, Toppila‐Salmi S, Valentin‐Rostan M, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura M, Wahn U, Walker S, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. 2019 ARIA Care pathways for allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2019; 74:2087-2102. [PMID: 30955224 DOI: 10.1111/all.13805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a proven therapeutic option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. Many guidelines or national practice guidelines have been produced but the evidence-based method varies, many are complex and none propose care pathways. This paper reviews care pathways for AIT using strict criteria and provides simple recommendations that can be used by all stakeholders including healthcare professionals. The decision to prescribe AIT for the patient should be individualized and based on the relevance of the allergens, the persistence of symptoms despite appropriate medications according to guidelines as well as the availability of good-quality and efficacious extracts. Allergen extracts cannot be regarded as generics. Immunotherapy is selected by specialists for stratified patients. There are no currently available validated biomarkers that can predict AIT success. In adolescents and adults, AIT should be reserved for patients with moderate/severe rhinitis or for those with moderate asthma who, despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and adherence, continue to exhibit exacerbations that appear to be related to allergen exposure, except in some specific cases. Immunotherapy may be even more advantageous in patients with multimorbidity. In children, AIT may prevent asthma onset in patients with rhinitis. mHealth tools are promising for the stratification and follow-up of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA‐France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR Montpellier France
- INSERM U 1168, VIMA : Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches Villejuif France
- UMR‐S 1168 Université Versailles St‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines Montigny le Bretonneux France
- Euforea Brussels Belgium
- Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH Bethesda Maryland
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | | | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou” University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Crete and International Primary Care Respiratory Group Crete Greece
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Romania
| | - Josep M. Anto
- Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL) ISGlobAL Barcelona Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) Barcelona Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Barcelona Spain
| | - Claus Bachert
- ENT Department, Upper Airways Research Laboratory Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA‐France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR Montpellier France
| | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Centre, Member of GALEN, Humboldt‐Uniersität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Sinthia Bosnic‐Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Local Health District University of Sydney Glebe New South Wales Australia
| | | | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Moises A. Calderon
- Imperial College London ‐ National Heart and Lung Institute Royal Brompton Hospital NHS London UK
| | - Giorgio W. Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Clinic Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Research Hospital Humanitas University Milan Italy
| | - Luigi Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research University of Cartagena, Campus de Zaragocilla Cartagena Colombia
- Foundation for the Development of Medical and Biological Sciences (Fundemeb) Cartagena Colombia
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Vall d'Hebron & ARADyAL Research Network Barcelona Spain
| | - Thomas Casale
- Division of Allergy/Immunology University of South Florida Tampa Florida
| | - Lorenzo Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology USL Toscana Centro Prato Italy
| | - Derek Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Elisio Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (AgeUPNetWork) University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Alvaro A. Cruz
- ProAR – Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma Federal University of Bahia Salvador Brazil
- WHO GARD Planning Group Salvador Brazil
| | | | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Section, National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - George Du Toit
- Guy's and st Thomas' NHS Trust, Kings College London London UK
| | - Mark Dykewicz
- Section of Allergy and Immunology Saint Louis University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology Sagamihara National Hospital Sagamihara Japan
| | - Jean Luc Fauquert
- Unité de pneumo‐allergologie de l'enfant, pôle pédiatrique CHU de Clermont‐Ferrand‐Estaing Clermont‐Ferrand France
| | | | - Wytske J. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Centres Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - João Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technology and Information Systems Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- Medida, Lda Porto Portugal
| | | | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergology Erasmus MC Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Peter W. Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Despo Ierodiakonou
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Crete and International Primary Care Respiratory Group Crete Greece
| | - Tomohisa Iinuma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan
| | | | | | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
| | - Igor Kaidashev
- Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy Poltava Ukraine
| | - Musa Khaitov
- Institute of Immunology, Federal Medicobiological Agency, Laboratory of Molecular immunology National Research Center Moscow Russian Federation
| | - Omer Kalayci
- Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Unit Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Marek L. Kowalski
- Department of Immunology and Allergy, Healthy Ageing Research Center Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
- Sach's Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
| | - Violeta Kvedariene
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases and Allergology Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - Stefania La Grutta
- Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology (IBIM) National Research Council (CNR) Palermo Italy
| | - Désirée Larenas‐Linemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital México City Mexico
| | - Susanne Lau
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany
| | | | - Lan Le
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hochiminh City Vietnam
| | - Karin Lodrup Carlsen
- Department of Paediatrics Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - Olga Lourenço
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS – UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre University of Beira Interior Covilhã Portugal
| | | | | | - Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Gregoire Mercier
- Département de l’Information Médicale, Unité Médico‐Economie University Hospital Montpellier France
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health Padua General University Hospital Padua Italy
| | - Robyn O’Hehir
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan
| | - Giovanni B. Pajno
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit University of Messina Messina Italy
| | - Hae‐Sim Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Petr Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University in Prague Pilsen Czech Republic
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases Ospedale Policlino San Martino ‐University of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | | | - Graham Roberts
- David Hide Centre, St Mary's Hospital Isle of Wight and University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Department of Pediatrics Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | | | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Medical School, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - Bolesław Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
| | - Mario Sanchez‐Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department Centro Medico‐Docente La Trinidad Caracas Venezuela
| | - Glenis Scadding
- The Royal National TNE Hospital University College London London UK
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group Imperial College London London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Imperial College London London UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - Gunter J. Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Outpatient Allergy Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - Ana Todo Bom
- Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra and Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
| | - Sanna Toppila‐Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | | | - Arunas Valiulis
- Clinic of Children's Diseases Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine Vilnius Lithuania
- Department of Public Health Institute of Health Sciences Vilnius Lithuania
- European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS‐SP) Brussels Belgium
| | - Erkka Valovirta
- Department of Lung Diseases and Clinical Immunology, Terveystalo Allergy Clinic University of Turku Turku Finland
| | - Maria‐Teresa Ventura
- Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology University of Bari Medical School Bari Italy
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Pediatric Department Charité, Berlin Germany
| | | | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale Florida
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario
| | - Arzu Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Celal Bayar University Manisa Turkey
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Centre, Member of GALEN, Humboldt‐Uniersität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
ARIA-Leitlinie 2019: Behandlung der allergischen Rhinitis im deutschen Gesundheitssystem. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-019-1938-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
14
|
Abstract
Adherence to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is crucial for its efficacy. Subcutaneous AIT requires monthly visits (or more extended in the case of venom immunotherapy), while sublingual AIT is performed with a daily intake of allergen drops. Non-adherence to an AIT schedule and premature discontinuation are common problems. Various studies have shown controversial results on the rate of AIT adherence. The aim of this review is to describe the problem of non-adherence and to offer some evidence-based advice to allergologists on how to increase it. Better patient education at the beginning of treatment, sharing with patients the decision on which type of immunotherapy to select and showing sincere interest in their treatment concerns are some tips that can help to increase adherence. A well organized allergologist time schedule not only increases safety but also offers the possibility of close follow-up and an increase in patient loyalty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikolas Dietis
- a Medical School, University of Cyprus , Nicosia , Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Senti G, Freiburghaus AU, Larenas-Linnemann D, Hoffmann HJ, Patterson AM, Klimek L, Di Bona D, Pfaar O, Ahlbeck L, Akdis M, Weinfeld D, Contreras-Verduzco FA, Pedroza-Melendez A, Skaarup SH, Lee SM, Cardell LO, Schmid JM, Westin U, Dollner R, Kündig TM. Intralymphatic Immunotherapy: Update and Unmet Needs. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2018; 178:141-149. [PMID: 30391954 DOI: 10.1159/000493647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only allergy treatment that confers long-term symptom amelioration for patients suffering from allergy. The most frequently used allergen application route is subcutaneous injection (SCIT), commonly taken as the gold standard, followed by sublingual (SLIT) or oral (OIT) application of allergen preparations. This is an up-to-date review of the clinical evidence for a novel route of allergen application, i.e., directly into lymph nodes - intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). The major advantages of ILIT over the current AIT approaches are its short duration and the low allergen doses administered. The whole treatment consists of merely 3 ultrasound-guided injections into inguinal lymph nodes 1 month apart. While the number of patients included in randomised controlled trials is still limited, the clinical results for ILIT are encouraging, but more clinical trials are needed, as well as more preclinical work for optimising formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Senti
- Clinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
| | | | | | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Chair and School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari - Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lars Ahlbeck
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research SIAF, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - Dan Weinfeld
- Asthma and Allergy Clinic (Adults), Department of Internal Medicine, South Alvsborgs (Central) Hospital, Boras, Sweden
| | | | | | - Søren H Skaarup
- Department of Clinical Medicine - Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sang Min Lee
- Division of Allergy and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Lars-Olaf Cardell
- Division of ENT Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulla Westin
- Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Region Skane, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ralph Dollner
- Department Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Clinic for Head-Neck and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital (OUS) HF - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Keefe KR, Ngo-Howard M, Platt MP, Brook CD. Compliance With Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Appointments in an Urban Tertiary Care Setting. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2018; 32:473-477. [PMID: 30124053 DOI: 10.1177/1945892418793518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. Reported adherence rates to SCIT have been low, ranging between 50% and 89%. This study sought to evaluate compliance to SCIT in an urban "safety net," tertiary care center, and to evaluate for disparities in compliance based upon insurance and socioeconomic status. METHODS A retrospective chart review of SCIT patients between 2003 and 2016 was performed. Demographic data, insurance carriers, and comorbidities were collected. Compliance was evaluated on treatment adherence (percentage of injections administered/scheduled appointments). Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software. Linear regression analysis was performed to compare compliance to the variables, asthma, duration of therapy, payor, and age. Analysis of variance was used to compare mean compliance between payor groups. RESULTS Two hundred five patients met our inclusion criteria and 28 were excluded. Insurance composition was Medicaid (67, 33%), Medicare (18, 9%), Health Safety Net (HSN) in Massachusetts (33, 16%), and commercial payors (82, 42%). Linear regression demonstrated that age, duration of therapy, and asthma status were not related to the percentage of missed doses ( P > .05). Payor status was statistically predictive of missed doses ( P = .02). When comparing average percentage of missed immunotherapy shots, Medicaid patients missed the most 34.2%, followed by Medicare 24.4%, commercial insurance 19.9%, and HSN in Massachusetts 18.5% ( P ≤ .02). CONCLUSION In a cohort of patients at a tertiary care "safety-net" center serving a low-income population, compliance to SCIT was found to be overall high but lower in the Medicaid population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Minhtran Ngo-Howard
- 2 Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael P Platt
- 1 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,2 Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher D Brook
- 1 Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,2 Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Allergies are steadily gaining in importance in the Western world. For over one hundred years, immunology has been the only causal treatment. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) aims at the cure of allergy or at least freedom from allergy symptoms. In association with this, adherence poses a complex problem. Both treatment applications commonly used in Germany-sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy-show poor persistence on the part of the patients. In most cases, SIT is not carried out to the end of the recommended duration and instead is discontinued prematurely. Corresponding figures from 3‑year studies in the literature range from 41- 93% for uncompleted SLIT and from 40-77% for uncompleted SCIT. Patient adherence is subject to influencing factors of various dimensions that are interdependent in complex relationships. The physician-patient relationship is just as decisive a factor for treatment success as the patient's understanding of allergy, treatment, and the importance of adherence.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ellenburg JT, Lieberman JA, Pattanaik D. Adherence and systemic reaction rates to allergy immunotherapy among veterans. ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY 2016; 7:127-130. [PMID: 28107142 PMCID: PMC5244266 DOI: 10.2500/ar.2016.7.0170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Although allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is effective and safe, nonadherence is common. Limited data exist regarding adherence to AIT, factors that affect adherence, and systemic reactions associated with AIT among veteran populations. Objective: To evaluate adherence to AIT and the prevalence of reactions secondary to AIT among patients at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of veterans who received AIT at a single Veterans Affairs facility. Age, race, sex, the total number of shots, travel distance, a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the number of severe adverse reactions were compared between the veterans who were adherent and veterans who were nonadherent. Results: The overall adherence rate was 60.9%. Factors associated with adherence were a chart diagnosis of PTSD (29.3% [adherent group] versus 13.6% [nonadherent group]; p = 0.03) and home residence being a further distance from the facility (21.9 miles / 35.2 kilometers [adherent group] versus 18.0 miles / 28.9 kilometers [nonadherent group]; p = 0.03). Patients who were adherent received an average of more total injections compared with patients who were nonadherent. Age, sex, race, and history of systemic reactions during AIT displayed no statistically significant differences between the groups. There were a total of 20 systemic reactions, and the systemic reaction rate was 0.2% per AIT encounter and 0.1% per injection. Conclusion: AIT adherence and systemic reaction rates among veterans at our facility was comparable with similar studies. Adherence was associated with a chart diagnosis of PTSD and home residence that was further away from the clinic.
Collapse
|