Mechanisms Underlying Drug Delivery to Peripheral Arteries

Impact of a Less Than 50% Residual Stenosis Following Vessel Preparation in Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

PURPOSE

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been established as first-line therapy in femoropopliteal (FP) intervention, and successful vessel preparation (VP) is considered a key element. However, the clinical impact of successful VP remains unknown. This retrospective study examined the clinical impact of successful VP in DCB FP intervention.

METHODS

In total, 268 patients (308 limbs) who underwent successful FP intervention using DCB without atherectomy devices for symptomatic lower extremity artery disease between March 2018 and December 2019 were included in this study (high-dose DCB: 69.8%; low-dose DCB: 30.2%). Successful VP was defined as <50% residual stenosis and

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 2.1 (interquartile range=1.1-2.7) years. Successful VP was achieved in 163 patients (60.8%). Primary patency and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were significantly higher in the successful VP group than in the nonsuccessful VP group (54.2% vs 33.0%, p<0.001; 69.9% vs 57.7%, p=0.047). In the successful VP group, high-dose DCB and low-dose DCB were comparable in primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR (53.2% vs 53.6%, p=0.48; 68.7% vs 70.9%, p=0.69). In nonsuccessful VP group, high-dose DCB demonstrated numerically higher primary patency but not statistically significant than low-dose DCB (44.5% vs 16.0%, p=0.06), whereas no significant difference in freedom from CD-TLR was observed (56.0% vs 58.9%, p=0.29). On multivariate analysis, successful VP and preballoon size to reference vessel diameter ratio were significantly associated with primary patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving successful VP before DCB was independently associated with primary patency in DCB FP intervention.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study revealed that the successful vessel preparation (VP) before DCB and preballoonsize to reference vessel diameter ratio were independently associated with primary patency in DCB femoropopliteal intervention. When successful VP was achieved only before DCB treatment, the clinical outcomes were comparable between high-dose DCB and low-dose DCB at midterm follow-up.To maximized DCB efficacy, successful VP is very important in daily clinical practice.

Collapse

Key Words

• drug-coated balloon
• peripheral artery disease
• vessel preparation

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Yusuke Tomoi Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Yoshimitsu Soga Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Kazuaki Imada Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Nobuaki Sakai Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Tomonori Katsuki Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Kenji Ando Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan

Collapse

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to summarize whether the application of additional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can change the outcomes of endovascular treatment in femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions compared with conventional angiography alone based on the existing study and evidence.

METHODS

Studies published until September 2022 were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the methods of combination of Medical Subject Headings and free text words. The outcomes included in these studies were primary patency rate or restenosis rate and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) rate, and most studies were concerned about the 12-month results. Two independent authors conducted the process of study selection. And the pooled analysis was attempted.

RESULTS

Finally, the inclusion criteria were met by 4 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 3 retrospective studies) involving 1160 patients. IVUS played its role in measuring lesions and/or guiding wiring passage. Most of the included studies showed that IVUS could achieve a higher 12-month primary patency rate (from 70% to 90%) and higher 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (from 83.9% to 94.7%) than angiography. The tentative pooled analysis also showed that IVUS significantly improved the 12-month primary patency rate (OR: 2.21, 95%CI: [1.38-3.55], p=0.001) and the 12-month freedom from cdTLR rate (OR: 1.70, 95%CI [1.04-2.78], p=0.03) compared with angiography alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions may have its own advantages such as higher primary patency rate and freedom from cdTLR rate at 12 months. As a novel technology, IVUS is expected to become another beneficial option to guide clinicians performing endovascular therapy in addition to angiography and may achieve better clinical outcomes. More prospective and high-quality studies are needed in the future to investigate the role of IVUS in the process of femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular treatment.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This review summarized a few available studies to promote understanding of IVUS and reveal its potential. This novel technology shows the possibility of achieving better clinical outcomes than angiography in femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular therapy such as higher 12-month primary patency rate shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider suitable technologies applied to individualized treatment. IVUS seems to provide clinicians additional option in clinical practice and benefit patients well in the future. And it needs us to conduct more high-quality studies to explore its roles and advantages in endovascular treatment.

Drug-coated balloon: an effective alternative to stent strategy in small-vessel coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis

Background

Small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequently observed in coronary angiography and linked to a higher risk of lesion failure and restenosis. Currently, treatment of small vessels is not standardized while having drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as possible strategies. We aimed to conduct a meta-analytic approach to assess the effectiveness of treatment strategies and outcomes for small-vessel CAD.

Methods

Comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting treatment strategies of small-vessel CAD with a reference diameter of ≤3.0 mm. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion thrombosis, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as clinical outcomes. Outcomes from single-arm and randomized studies based on measures by means of their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were compared using a meta-analytic approach. Statistical significance was assumed if CIs did not overlap.

Results

Thirty-seven eligible studies with a total of 31,835 patients with small-vessel CAD were included in the present analysis. Among those, 28,147 patients were treated with DES (24 studies) and 3,299 patients with DCB (18 studies). Common baseline characteristics were equally distributed in the different studies. TLR rate was 4% in both treatment strategies [0.04; 95% CI 0.03-0.05 (DES) vs. 0.03-0.07 (DCB)]. MI occurred in 3% of patients receiving DES and in 2% treated with DCB [0.03 (0.02-0.04) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.03)]. All-cause mortality was 3% in the DES group [0.03 (0.02-0.05)] compared with 1% in the DCB group [0.01 (0.00-0.03)]. Approximately 9% of patients with DES developed MACE vs. 4% of patients with DCB [0.09 (0.07-0.10) vs. 0.04 (0.02-0.08)]. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant impact of reference vessel diameter on outcomes.

Conclusion

This large meta-analytic approach demonstrates similar clinical and angiographic results between treatment strategies with DES and DCB in small-vessel CAD. Therefore, DES may be waived in small coronary arteries when PCI is performed with DCB.

Comparison of angiography and ultrasound for femoropopliteal angioplasty: decision-making and 12-month outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) combined with angiography during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty impacts treatment strategies and the 12-month patency of the femoropopliteal artery, compared to angiography alone.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 137 patients who underwent a femoropopliteal endovascular intervention between February 2020 and May 2021. Among these interventions, 43 were guided by IVUS combined with angiography and the remaining 94 were guided by angiography only. Treatment strategies and 12-month patency were analyzed in both groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to clarify the predictors of restenosis within 12 months.

RESULTS

Primary patency at 12 months was significantly higher in the IVUS group than in the angiography group (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047). The reference diameter on IVUS images was greater than that on angiography images. Therefore, the IVUS group presented a higher balloon-to-vessel ratio [1.0 (0.97, 1.01) vs. 1.06 (1.0.1.25)]. More adjunctive stents were required in the angiography group. However, more dissections were performed in the IVUS group, with no difference in flow-limiting dissections between groups. Target disease length (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.021) and balloon-to-vessel ratio (odds ratio 0.01, P=0.021) were independent predictors of restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with angiography guidance alone, IVUS guidance for femoropopliteal artery-related treatment can significantly increase primary patency. This finding may be explained by the selection of larger balloons in IVUS and the resulting sufficient plaque compression and elastic membrane stretch. Moreover, IVUS was shown to detect more non-flow-limiting dissections than angiography.

Understudied factors in drug-coated balloon design and evaluation: A biophysical perspective

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous interventional therapy allows for durable reopening of the narrowed lumen via physical tissue expansion and local anti-restenosis drug delivery, providing an alternative to traditional uncoated balloons or a permanent indwelling implant such as a conventional metallic drug-eluting stent. While DCB-based treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been incorporated into clinical guidelines, DCB use has been recently curtailed due to reports that showed evidence of increased mortality risk in patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons. Given the United States Food and Drug Administration's 2019 consequent warning regarding PTX-eluting DCBs and the subsequent marked reduction in clinical DCB use, there is now a critical need to better understand the compositional and mechanical factors underlying DCB efficacy and safety. Most work to date on DCB refinement has focused on designing both the enabling balloon catheter and alternate coatings composed of various drugs and excipients, followed by device evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. We contend that improvement in DCB performance will require a better understanding of the biophysical factors operative during and following balloon deployment, and moreover that the elaboration and demonstrated control of these factors are needed to address current concerns with DCB use. This article provides a perspective on the biophysical interactions that govern DCB performance and offers new design strategies for the development of next-generation DCB devices.

Three-year outcome of directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon for the treatment of common femoral artery steno-occlusive lesions

BACKGROUND

Endarterectomy is considered the gold standard therapy for common femoral artery (CFA) steno-occlusive lesions, but a significant risk of perioperative mortality and complications has been reported.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy at a long-term follow-up of patients with CFA steno-occlusive lesions treated with directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon (DCB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this single-center registry, 78 patients (male: 80.7%; age: 71 ± 15 years; occlusions: 25%) with 80 CFA lesions were included, with 39.7% of them undergoing directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon due to critical limb ischemia and 60.3% due to lower-limb intermittent claudication. The long-term follow-up was completed by 75 patients (3 years). The 31 patients with critical ischemia (39.7%) were further subdivided into 20 (25.6%) patients with pain at rest and 11 (14.1%) with trophic changes, ulcers and/or tissue loss. We considered the primary and the secondary outcome, referring, respectively to peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥ 2.4 on duplex or > 50% stenosis on digital subtraction angiography at 36 months and to clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 36 months.

RESULTS

The primary and secondary outcome was obtained in 84% and 86.7% of patients, at 36 months of follow up. Bailout stenting was necessary in 6/80 cases (7.5%) for suboptimal result. Freedom from MALE was obtained in 98.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon strategy for the treatment of CFA lesions is effective at a long-term follow-up and could be considered as a good alternative to surgery.

Directional atherectomy before paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty in complex femoropopliteal disease: The VIVA REALITY study

BACKGROUND

Drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty significantly reduces reintervention rates in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, stand-alone DCB use in long, severely calcified lesions is frequently associated with vessel recoil and/or high-grade dissections necessitating provisional stent implantation.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the safety and effectiveness of a vessel preparation strategy with directional atherectomy (DA) prior to DCB angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severely calcified femoropopliteal PAD.

METHODS

REALITY (NCT02850107) prospectively enrolled subjects at 13 multinational centers with 8-36 cm femoropopliteal stenoses or occlusions with bilateral vessel wall calcification treated with DA prior to DCB angioplasty. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month primary patency, and the primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events through 30 days. Independent angiographic and duplex core laboratories assessed outcomes and a Clinical Events Committee adjudicated events.

RESULTS

A total of 102 subjects were enrolled; one lesion was treated per subject. The mean lesion length was 17.9 ± 8.1 cm, 39.0% were chronic total occlusions (mean lesion length 22.6 ± 8.6 cm); 86.2% of lesions exhibited moderate to severe bilateral calcification. Provisional stents were implanted in 8.8% (9/102) of subjects. Twelve-month primary patency rate was 76.7% (66/86) and freedom from CD-TLR rate was 92.6% (87/94). No device or procedure related deaths and one index-limb major amputation were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque excision with DA in patients with symptomatic severely calcified femoropopliteal arterial disease prior to DCB angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment strategy with a low provisional stent rate.