Impact of catheter fragmentation followed by local intrapulmonary thrombolysis in acute high risk pulmonary embolism as primary therapy

Transcatheter interventions in refractory pulmonary artery hypertension and pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary artery hypertension causes remodeling of distal pulmonary arterial vasculature leading to increased resistance of the pulmonary arterial system, right ventricular dysfunction, and sudden cardiac death. The diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) diagnosis is made when mean pulmonary artery pressure during catheterization is ≥25 mmHg at rest, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) more than 3 wood units, a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of <15 mmHg. One year survival rate is 86.3% and 5 year survival rate in PAH is 61.2%, and only 7 years of median survival. Although several breakthrough advances are made in the medical management for PAH, there are some patients who do not respond to medications and continue to detoriate despite optimal medical therapy. The non-responders to medical management are those patients whose right atrial pressure is >20 mmHg or cardiac index is <2.0 L/min/m2, which are pointers of poor prognosis. For medical refractory patients invasive procedures such as atrial septostomy, Potts shunt, and pulmonary artery denervation are a therapeutic or palliative strategy in the treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension and serve as a bridge before surgery and heart lung transplantation.

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Percutaneous Pulmonary Artery Thrombectomy in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

The sex differences in use, safety outcomes, and health-care resource use of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy are not well characterized.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the sex differences in outcomes for patients diagnosed with PE who undergo percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study used national inpatient claims data to identify patients in the United States with a discharge diagnosis of PE who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy between January 2016 and December 2018. We evaluated the demographics, comorbidities, safety outcomes (in-hospital mortality), and health-care resource use (discharge to home, length of stay, and hospital charges) of patients with PE undergoing percutaneous thrombectomy.

RESULTS

Among 1,128,904 patients with a diagnosis of PE between 2016 and 2018, 5,160 patients (0.5%) underwent percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy. When compared with male patients, female patients showed higher procedural bleeding (16.9% vs 11.2%; P < .05), required more blood transfusions (11.9% vs 5.7%; P < .05), and experienced more vascular complications (5.0% vs 1.5%; P < .05). Women experienced higher in-hospital mortality (16.9% vs 9.3%; adjusted OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0; P = .003) when compared with men. Although length of stay and hospital charges were similar to those of men, women were less likely to be discharged home after surviving hospitalization (47.9% vs 60.3%; adjusted OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99; P = .04).

INTERPRETATION

In this large nationwide cohort, women with PE who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy showed higher morbidity and in-hospital mortality compared with men.

A review of the usefulness of catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a health problem; around 10 million cases occur yearly with substantial morbidity and mortality. Those who survive may be left with long-term sequelae. Those sequelae might include chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, persistent right ventricular dysfunction, exercise intolerance, and reduced quality of life. Current PE management consists of anticoagulation alone, systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, and surgical embolectomy. The severity of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) depends on the clinic and not exclusively on the extent of radiological or anatomical involvement. In this review, we present the main clinical and functional characteristics of patients in whom thrombotic fragmentation plus catheter-guided thrombolysis is used to manage acute PE of intermediate-high risk and torpid evolution within the first hours of admission.

Efficacy and safety of hydro-mechanical defragmentation in intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular syndrome. Percutaneous catheter directed hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the recommended treatment options for PE in patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or failed systemic thrombolysis (ST). We aimed to identify the safety and outcomes of catheter directed HMD in patients with high-risk PE. This nonrandomized controlled trial enrolled all patients with confirmed diagnoses of high- and intermediate-high-risk PE from October 2019 till January 2021. Fifty patients were included and divided into two groups by the PE response team according to the presence or absence of a contraindication for ST. Group B (ST) consists of 25 patients and group A (HMD) of 25 patients who cannot receive ST.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable regarding baseline clinical characteristics with mean age 51 ± 13 years. In group A, systolic blood pressure (BP) and oxygen saturation increased after 24 h (p = 0.002) and 48 h (p < 0.001) compared to pre-HMD procedure. Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and respiratory rate (RR) decreased after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.001) compared to pre-HMD procedure. The increase in systolic BP and oxygen saturation were significantly higher in HMD group compared with ST group after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.007). The decrease in PASP and RR was significantly higher in HMD group compared to ST group after 48 h and at 30 days (p < 0.001). Mortality rate at 30 days was 20% in HMD group compared to 32% in ST group.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter directed HMD for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE is safe and effective with acceptable mortality Trial registration Clinical trial ID: NCT04099186.

Catheter-directed therapy in pulmonary embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates and potential long-term sequelae. Systemic thrombolysis has been virtually the only therapeutic option available for patients with hemodynamic instability over decades. Recently, interventional therapy of PE has gained increasing interest. Multiple devices were developed; these include devices for local thrombolysis, thrombus fragmentation, thrombus aspiration, and combined approaches. However, the available evidence is limited to mostly small, nonrandomized studies. In these studies, safety and efficacy data from patients with intermediate or high-risk PE are promising. However, due to the lack of adequately powered randomized trials, interventional treatment of intermediate or high-risk PE cannot be recommended as standard-of-care. The decision on whether and how to perform a catheter-based intervention should therefore be left to the discretion of the local team, depending on the patients' clinical status, bleeding risk, local expertise, and available devices. The implementation of local multidisciplinary PE response teams is recommended by international guidelines to provide the best possible treatment.

The Use of POCUS to Manage ICU Patients With COVID-19

Since the advent of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, clinicians have had to modify how they provide high-value care while mitigating the risk of viral spread. Routine imaging studies have been discouraged due to elevated transmission risk. Patients who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 often have a protracted hospital course with progression of disease. Given the need for close follow-up of patients, we recommend the use of ultrasonography, particularly point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), to manage patients with COVID-19 through their entire ICU course. POCUS will allow a clinician to evaluate and monitor cardiac and pulmonary function, as well as evaluate for thromboembolic disease, place an endotracheal tube, confirm central venous catheter placement, and rule out a pneumothorax. If a patient improves sufficiently to perform weaning trials, POCUS can also help evaluate readiness for ventilator liberation.

Catheter-based therapies in acute pulmonary embolism

AIMS

To provide a systematic review of catheter-based therapies of acute pulmonary embolism.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Studies published in peer-reviewed journals before February 2017 were included and categorized according to the mechanism of thrombus removal: fragmentation, rheolytic therapy, aspiration or catheter-directed thrombolysis. Strengths, challenges and the level of evidence of each device were evaluated. We found 16 different catheter-based therapies for acute PE; all but one being used off-label. The majority of procedures involve catheter-directed thrombolysis. Aspiration therapy shows promise, but limited data are available. Rheolytic therapy should be used with caution, if at all, due to the high number of associated complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-based therapies show promise as a treatment for acute PE, though evidence is lacking. Further research into the efficacy and safety of devices is needed.

Treatment of the acute severe pulmonary embolism using endovascular methods

Purpose

To present a single-centre experience with endovascular treatment of patients with severe symptoms secondary to acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Material and methods

Twenty-five patients were treated due to contraindications or deficient effects of systemic thrombolytic therapy. The patients were treated with a combination of fragmentation and aspiration, only aspiration, or only fragmentation, and with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy.

Results

The saturation was improved following treatment in all patients, except in one where the procedure could not be completed. There were no immediate or late procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

Endovascular treatment of severe PE is a safe and efficient option in patients with failing effect or contraindication to systemic thrombolysis.

Health risk stratification based on computed tomography pulmonary artery obstruction index for acute pulmonary embolism

Early effective identification of high-risk patients for acute pulmonary embolism (APE) contributes to timely treatment. The pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI) in computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a semi-quantitative observation index, commonly used to evaluate the severity of a patient's condition. This study explores the ability of PAOI to assess the risk stratification of APE. Thirty patients with APE were analysed. They were classified according to the guidelines, and the PAOI and cardiovascular parameters were measured in CTA. The difference of PAOI between different risk stratification patients was compared, and the predictive value of the PAOI for high-risk stratification was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve. The correlation between PAOI and cardiovascular parameters was also analysed by Spearman correlation analysis. The PAOI in low- and high-risk patients was (33.2 ± 18.6)% and (68.1 ± 11.8)% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The PAOI was strongly predictive for high-risk patients. The cut-off value was 52.5%, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 81.0%. The PAOI was correlated with the main cardiovascular parameters. We conclude that the PAOI in CTA is helpful for assessing risk stratification in patients with APE, which contributes to the selection of both the treatment plan and prognostic evaluation.

Catheter-Directed Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Modern Literature

We summarize the evidence for the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with and without ultrasound-assisted therapy for treating submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in a systematic review. The primary efficacy outcome was mortality. Outcomes were pooled across studies with the random-effects model. Twenty-four studies enrolled 700 patients in total; 653 received mechanical thromboembolectomy treatments for PE (mortality rate, 9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-13%], P = .12; rate of minor complications, 6% [95% CI, 2%-13%]). In the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) studies, the mortality rate was 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) and in the non-USAT studies, it was 9% (95% CI, 6%-13%). Secondary safety outcomes were all bleeding events, which occurred in 12% (95% CI, 7%-20%) of the USAT studies and in 10% (95% CI, 5%-20%) of the non-USAT studies. Current clinical evidence does not prove USAT is superior over CDT methods.