Clinical significance of bendopnea in heart failure-Systematic review and meta-analysis

The third PLeuralEffusion And Symptom Evaluation (PLEASE-3) study: Bendopnoea in patients with pleural effusion

Background

Pleural effusions often cause disabling breathlessness, however the mechanism is unknown. Patients with pleural effusions are subjected to pleural fluid drainage on a 'trial and error' basis, as symptom relief varies. This population commonly complain of bendopnoea (breathlessness on bending forward) which has not been investigated. Our pilot data found bendopnoea was significantly associated with presence of pleural effusion. The PLEASE-3 study will evaluate bendopnoea as a screening test for effusion-related breathlessness, its predictive value of symptomatic benefits from fluid drainage and explore its underlying physiological mechanism.

Methods

PLEASE-3 is a multi-centre prospective study. Eligible patients are assessed at baseline (pre-drainage) and for patients undergoing drainage, up to 72 h post-procedure. Outcome measures include the prevalence of bendopnoea, its correlation with size of effusion and its predictive value of breathlessness relief after drainage. The relationship of bendopnoea with breathlessness, physiological parameters, functional capacity and diaphragmatic characteristics will be assessed. The study will recruit 200 participants.

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate bendopnoea in patients with pleural effusion. It has minimal exclusion criteria to ensure that the results are generalisable. The presence and clinical significance of bendopnoea in the context of pleural effusion requires thorough investigation. The post assessment of patients undergoing pleural fluid drainage will provide insight into whether the presence of bendopnoea is able to predict clinical outcomes.

Trial Registration

Name of the registry: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Trial registration number: ACTRN12622000465752. URL of the trial registry record for this trial: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=383639&isReview=true Date of registration: Registered on 24 March 2022. Funding of the trial: This study has received funding from the Sir Charles Gairdner Research Advisory Council research project grant. The study is sponsored by the Institute for Respiratory Health, a not-for-profit organisation. Name and contact information for the trial sponsor: Mr Bi Lam; Finance manager. Level 2, 6 Verdun Street, Nedlands WA 6009. t‖ + 61 8 6151 0877 e‖ bi.lam@resphealth.uwa.edu.au Role of sponsor : The funder is not involved in the planning of the study, gathering, analysing, and interpreting the data, or in preparing the manuscript.

Bendopnea prevalence and prognostic value in older patients with heart failure: FRAGILE-HF-SONIC-HF post hoc analysis

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic value of bendopnea in older patients hospitalized for heart failure.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis was performed using two prospective, multicenter, observational studies: the FRAGILE-HF (main cohort) and SONIC-HF (validation cohort) cohorts. Patients were categorized based on the presence of bendopnea, which was evaluated before discharge. The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality after discharge.

RESULTS

Among the 1,243 patients (median age, 81 years; 57.2% male) in the FRAGILE-HF cohort and 225 (median age, 79 years; 58.2% men) in the SONIC-HF cohort, bendopnea was observed in 31 (2.5%) and 10 (4.4%) patients, respectively. Over a 2-year follow-up period, all-cause death occurred in 20.8% and 21.9% of the patients in the FRAGILE-HF and SONIC-HF cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated significantly higher mortality rates in patients with bendopnea than in those without bendopnea in the FRAGILE-HF (log-rank P = 0.006) and SONIC-HF cohorts (log-rank P = 0.014). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified bendopnea as an independent prognostic factor for all-cause mortality in both the FRAGILE-HF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-3.78, P = 0.012) and SONIC-HF cohorts (HR 4.20, 95% CI 1.63-10.79, P = 0.003), even after adjusting for conventional risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Bendopnea was observed in a relatively small proportion of older patients hospitalized for heart failure before discharge. However, its presence was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality.

Assessment of Volume Status in Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Assessment of volume status in hospitalized patients with heart failure is a critically important diagnostic skill that clinicians utilize frequently. However, accurate assessment is challenging and there is often significant inter-provider disagreement. This review serves as an appraisal of current methods of volume assessment amongst different categories of evaluation including patient history, physical exam, laboratory analysis, imaging, and invasive procedures. Within each category, this review highlights methods that are particularly sensitive or specific, or those that carry impactful positive or negative likelihood ratios. Utilization of the information that this review provides will allow clinicians to determine volume status of hospitalized heart failure patients more accurately and more precisely in order to provide appropriate and effective therapies.

Effect of Bendopnea on Achievement Medical Treatment Target Doses in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The newly described bendopnea in heart failure (HF) is associated with increased cardiac filling pressures. The aim of the study was to show the effect of bendopnea follow-up on reaching optimal medical treatment doses in HF.

METHODS

A total of 413 patients were screened, and we included 203 patients with HF who were previously evaluated for bendopnea. Demographic data, presence or absence of bendopnea, medical history, laboratory findings, and medical treatments were evaluated. Optimal medical therapy target doses at baseline and 3rd month were compared in groups with and without bendopnea.

RESULTS

On admission, 64 patients (31.5%) had bendopnea. The rate of patients with bendopnea decreased in the 3rd month (n=42, 20.7%). The proportion of patients who used at least 50% of the recommended medical treatment dose on admission and in the 3rd month was compared; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin receptor blockers use increased from 40.6% to 71.9% in those with bendopnea (P=0.013), from 56.1% to 81.3% in those without bendopnea (P<0.001) and beta-blockers use increased from 28.2% to 60.9% in those with bendopnea (P=0.042), from 31.6% to 69.8% in those without bendopnea (P<0.001). However, aldosterone antagonists use decreased from 70.3% to 67.2% in those with bendopnea (P=0.961), from 68.4 % to 64.1% in those without bendopnea (P=0.334). Bendopnea was independently effective in achieving ACE-I/ARB target doses (OR: 0.359, CI 95%: 0.151-0.854, P=0.020).

CONCLUSION

Bendopnea follow-up in HF patients can provide a significant improvement in reaching the recommended treatment target doses.

Bending oxygen saturation index and risk of worsening heart failure events in chronic heart failure

AIMS

Bendopnea is a clinical symptom of advanced heart failure with uncertain prognostic value. We aimed to evaluate whether bendopnea and the change in oxygen saturation when bending forward (bending oxygen saturation index [BOSI]) are associated with adverse outcomes in ambulatory chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively evaluated 440 subjects with symptomatic CHF. BOSI was defined as the difference between sitting and bending oxygen saturation (SpO₂ ). The endpoint was the total number of worsening heart failure (WHF) events (heart failure hospitalization or urgent heart failure visit requiring parenteral diuretic therapy). The mean age was 74 ± 10 years, 257 (58.6%) were male, and 226 (51.4%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. Bendopnea was present in 94 (21.4%) patients, and 120 (27.3%) patients had a BOSI ≥-3%. The agreement between BOSI ≥-3% and bendopnea was moderate (Gwet's AC 0.482, p < 0.001). At a median (p25%-p75%) follow-up of 2.17 years (0.88-3.16), we registered 441 WHF events in 148 patients. After multivariable adjustment, BOSI was independently associated with the risk for total WHF episodes (overall, p < 0.001). Compared to improvement/no change in SpO₂ when bending (BOSI 0%), those with BOSI ≥-3% showed an increased risk of WHF events (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-2.79; p < 0.001). In contrast, bendopnea was not associated with the risk of total WHF episodes (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.31; p = 0.705).

CONCLUSIONS

In ambulatory and stable CHF patients, BOSI ≥-3% and not bendopnea was independently associated with an increased risk of total (first and recurrent) WHF episodes. Awareness of SpO₂ while assessing bendopnea may be a useful tool for predicting heart failure decompensations.

Increased frequency of occurrence of bendopnea is associated with poor outcomes in heart failure outpatients

BACKGROUND

Relationship between the frequency of occurrence of bendopnea during the daily life of heart failure (HF) outpatients and clinical outcomes has never been evaluated before.

METHODS

Turkish Research Team-Heart Failure (TREAT-HF) is a network between HF centres, which undertakes multicentric observational studies in HF. Herein, the data including stable 573 HF patients with reduced ejection fraction out of seven HF centres were presented. A questionnaire was filled by the patients, with the question 'Do you experience shortness of breath while tying your shoelace?', assessing the presence and frequency of bendopnea.

RESULTS

To the question related to bendopnea, 48% of the patients answered 'yes, every time', 31% answered 'yes, sometimes', and 21% answered 'No'. Patients were followed for an average of 24 ± 14 months, and the patients who answered 'yes, every time' and 'yes, sometimes' to the bendopnea question were found having increased risk for both HF-related hospitalisations (HR:3.2, p < .001- HR:2.8, p = .005) and composite outcome consisting of 'HF-related hospitalisations and all-cause death in the multi-variate analysis (HR:3.1, p < .001- HR:3.0, p < .001). Kaplan Meier analysis for HF-related hospitalisation, all-cause death, and the composite of these were provided for these three groups, yielding significant and graded divergence curves with the best prognosis in 'no' group, with the moderate prognosis in 'sometimes' group, and with the worst prognosis in the 'every time' group.

CONCLUSION

For the first time in the literature, our study shows that the increased frequency of bendopnea occurrence in daily life is associated with poor outcomes in HF outpatients.

Differences in clinical characteristics and outcome of de novo heart failure compared to acutely decompensated chronic heart failure - systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence showed that the characteristics and outcome of those with de novo heart failure (HF) and acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF) were different. We aimed to perform a comprehensive search on the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with de novo HF and ADCHF.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search on de novo/new onset acute HF vs ADCHF from inception up until December 2019.

RESULTS

There were 38320 patients from 15 studies. De novo HF were younger and, had less prevalent hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack compared to ADCHF. Five studies showed a lower NT-proBNP in de novo HF patients, while one study showed no difference. Valvular heart disease as aetiology of heart failure was less frequent in de novo HF, and upon sensitivity analysis, hypertensive heart disease was more frequent in de novo HF. As for precipitating factors, ACS (OR 2.42; I²:89%) was more frequently seen in de novo HF, whereas infection was less frequently (OR 0.69; I²:32%) in ADCHF. De novo HF was associated with a significantly lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.63; I²:91%) and 1-year (OR 0.59; I²:59%) mortality. Meta-regression showed that 1-year mortality did not significantly vary with age (p = .106), baseline ejection fraction (p = .703), or HF reduced ejection fraction (p = .262).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors, aetiology, and precipitating factors of HF in de novo and ADCHF differ. De novo HF also had lower 1-year mortality and 3-month mortality compared to ADCHF.

[Risk Assessment of Development of the Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with a Preserved and Intermediate Ejection Fraction in the Presence of a Bendopnea Symptom]

Aim To evaluate the risk of major cardiovascular complications (CVC) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with intermediate and preserved ejection fraction (EF) depending on the presence of bendopnea symptom.Material and methods The study included 104 patients with stage II CHF and left ventricular EF ≥40 %. Mean age of the patients was 72.8±10.6 years. A test for detection of bendopnea symptom was performed for all patients. Two groups were formed: group 1, 69 patients with the bendopnea symptom and group 2, 35 patients with a negative test. Follow-up duration was 24 months. The composite endpoint (CEP) was death and hospitalization for any CVC.Results Mean time to the bendopnea symptom was 17.3±6.61 s. At two years of follow-up, the CEP was observed in 36 (34.6 %) patients, including 30 (43.5 %) patients in group 1 and 6 (17.1 %) patients in group 2. 12 patients died, and 9 of them had the bendopnea symptom. 21 patients of group 1 were hospitalized for CVC. Risk of CEP was significantly 1.7 times higher for men (relative risk, RR 1.7 [1.1; 2.6]) than for women. The presence of bendopnea symptom increased the risk of CEP 1.4 times (ОР 1.4 [1.1;1.9]) for women and 2.3 times (RR 2.3 [1.4; 3.6]) for men.Conclusion Results of the study demonstrated an unfavorable effect of bendopnea symptom on risk of CEP during the two-year follow-up of CHF patients with preserved and intermediate EF.