Activity of dalbavancin, alone and in combination with rifampicin, against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a foreign-body infection model

Effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapy for orthopaedic implant-related infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In vitro, animal, and clinical comparative studies have revealed that combinations of rifampicin with antibacterial agents are effective in the treatment of biofilm-associated infections. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapies compared with monotherapies without rifampicin in patients with orthopaedic implant-related infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical literature was comprehensively searched for studies assessing the effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapy in patients with orthopaedic implant-related infection. Identified studies were screened based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram. The primary outcome was the cure rate and the secondary outcome was the incidence of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed based on causative organisms, antibacterial agents, and types of surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were identified, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 cohort studies. Rifampicin combinations were associated with significantly higher cure rates than monotherapies in cohort studies, but not in RCTs. Subgroup analyses showed that rifampicin combinations were effective in patients infected with Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus spp.; in patients who underwent debridement, antibiotics, implant retention procedures; and in patients with one-stage revision. Moreover, combinations of rifampicin and fluoroquinolones were more effective than fluoroquinolones alone, while combinating rifampicin with other antibacterial agents showed no significant benefit. Combination treatment did not significantly affect adverse events in either RCTs or observational studies. Risk of bias assessment and summary of findings showed that the certainty of evidence for both RCTs and observational studies was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the potential effectiveness of rifampicin combination therapy for the cure of orthopaedic implant-related infection in some circumstances, although the certainty and quality of evidence were very low.

Antibiotic Efficacy against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms on Synthetic and Biological Vascular Grafts

BACKGROUND

Biofilm formation is one of the greatest challenges encountered in vascular graft infections. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of 5 antibiotics against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) biofilms on the surface of 4 vascular grafts.

METHODS

In vitro study of 2 clinical MSSA strains (MSSA2 and MSSA6) and 4 vascular grafts (Dacron, Dacron-silver-triclosan (DST), Omniflow-II, and bovine pericardium). After a 24-hr incubation period, the graft samples were divided into 6 groups: growth control (no treatment), ciprofloxacin 4.5 mg/L, cloxacillin 100 mg/L, dalbavancin 300 mg/L, daptomycin 140 mg/L, and linezolid 20 mg/L. Quantitative cultures were obtained and results expressed as log10 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). Analysis of variance was performed to compare biofilm formation between the different groups.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation MSSA2 count on the growth control Dacron graft was 10.05 ± 0.31 CFU/mL. Antibiotic treatment achieved a mean reduction of 45%; ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic (64%). Baseline MSSA2 counts were very low on the DST (0.50 ± 1.03 CFU/mL) and Omniflow-II (0.33 ± 0.78 CFU/mL) grafts. On the bovine pericardium patch, the count was 9.87 ± 0.50 CFU/mL, but this was reduced by a mean of 45% after antibiotic treatment (61% for ciprofloxacin). The mean MSSA6 count on the growth control Dacron graft was 9.63 ± 0.53 CFU/mL. Antibiotics achieved a mean reduction of 48%, with ciprofloxacin performing best (67% reduction). The baseline MSSA6 count on the DST graft was 8.54 ± 0.73 CFU/mL. Antibiotics reduced biofilm formation by 72%; cloxacillin was the most effective treatment (86%). The MSSA6 count on the untreated Omniflow-II graft was 1.17 ± 1.52 CFU/mL. For the bovine pericardium patch, it was 8.98 ± 0.67 CFU/mL. The mean reduction after antibiotic treatment was 46%, with cloxacillin achieving the greatest reduction (68%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vitro study, ciprofloxacin and cloxacillin performed best at reducing biofilms formed by clinical MSSA strains on the surface of biological and synthetic vascular grafts.

Real-World Use of Dalbavancin for Treatment of Soft Tissue and Bone Infection in Children: Safe, Effective and Hospital-Time Sparing

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and osteoarticular infections compound the burden of morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospitalizations among gram-positive infections. Dalbavancin, a second-generation, intravenous lipoglycopeptide, due to its prolonged half-life, can be a valuable alternative in their treatment when administered as inpatient treatment at the price of an extended hospital stay. Between October 2019 and September 2023, 31 children and adolescents were treated with dalbavancin because of bone and joint infections (n = 12 patients, 39%), ABSSSI (n = 13 patients, 42%), mainly for the limbs, facial cellulitis or complicated ABSSSI (n = 6 patients, 19%), at five Italian pediatric centers. Microbiological study provided gram-positive bacterial isolate in 16 cases, in 11 cases from a positive blood culture; 9 of them were MRSA. Twenty-five patients were initially treated with a different antibiotic therapy: beta-lactam-based in 18 patients (58%), glycopeptide-based in 15 patients (48%) and daptomycin in 6 (19%). The median time that elapsed between admission and start of dalbavancin was 18 days. A total of 61 doses of dalbavancin were administered to the 31 patients: 16 received a single dose while the remaining 15 patients received between two (n = 9) and nine doses. The frequency of administration was weekly in five cases or fortnightly in nine patients. Median length of stay in hospital was 16 days. Median time to discharge after the first dose of dalbavancin was 1 day. Treatment was very well-tolerated: of the 61 administered doses, only four doses, administered to four patients, were associated with an adverse event: drug extravasation during intravenous administration occurred in two patients, with no sequelae; however, in two patients the first administration was stopped soon after infusion start: in one (ID #11), due to headache and vomiting; in another (ID #12) due to a systemic reaction. In both patients, drug infusion was not repeated. None of the remaining 29 patients reported treatment failure (resistant or recurrent disease) or an adverse effect during a median follow-up time of two months. The use of dalbavancin was safe, feasible and also effective in shortening the hospital stay in children and adolescents.

A Narrative Review on the Role of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections

Bone and joint infections (BJI) require prolonged antimicrobial treatment, leading to lengthy hospitalizations, high costs, the risk of nosocomial infections, and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Dalbavancin is a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide approved for the treatment of adults and children with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. This narrative review aims to summarize the characteristics of dalbavancin and the current scientific evidence regarding its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of BJI. A literature search until June 2023 was performed to identify all published research about the role of dalbavancin in the management of BJI. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics characterized by prolonged half-life, high bactericidal activity against most Gram-positive bacteria, a good safety profile, and high tissue penetration, dalbavancin can be a valuable alternative to the treatment of BJI. Clinical studies have shown its non-inferiority compared to conventional therapies in BJI, offering potent activity against key pathogens and an extended dosing interval that may shorten hospitalization. In conclusion, dalbavancin represents a promising treatment option for BJI with a favorable safety profile, but further research in both adults and particularly children, who are ideal candidates for long-acting antibiotics, is necessary to evaluate the role of dalbavancin in BJI.

Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the most difficult-to-treat infections and, since the absence of recommendations, clinicians use different and heterogenic DBV dosing schedule regimens for the off-label treatment of osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and septic arthritis. Our aim is to systematically review the current literature to describe DBV administration schedules and their outcome in OA infections.

METHODS

According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the use of DBV in OA infections were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies and 450 patients were included, prevalently male (144/195, 73.8%) and diabetic (53/163, 32.5%). Overall, 280 (280/388, 72.2%) osteomyelitis, 79 (79/388, 20.4%) spondylodiscitis, and 29 (29/388, 7.5%) septic arthritis were considered. Staphylococcus aureus (164/243, 67.5%) was the most common pathogen isolated. A previous treatment failure (45/96, 46.9%) was the main reason for a switch to a long-acting antibiotic. Most patients were successfully cured with DBV (318/401, 79.3%). A source control was performed in most patients with a favourable outcome (80.4%), while MRSA was prevalently isolated in people with an unfavourable outcome (57%). While a higher percentage of success was found in people who received three doses of DBV 1 week apart (92.3%), a higher rate of treatment failure was recorded in cases of when the DBV cycle was composed of less than two or more than four doses (27.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

DBV has shown to be effective as a treatment for OA infections. The most favourable outcome was found in patients receiving three doses of DBV and with an adequate surgical management prior to antibiotic treatment. Although a rigorous administration schedule does not exist, DBV is a viable treatment option in the management of OA infections.

Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals' experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Clinical Effectiveness and Pharmacokinetics of Dalbavancin in Treatment-Experienced Patients with Skin, Osteoarticular, or Vascular Infections

Dalbavancin (DBV) is a lipoglycopeptide approved for the treatment of Gram-positive infections of the skin and skin-associated structures (ABSSSIs). Currently, its off-label use at different dosages for other infections deserves attention. This work aimed to study the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of DBV in outpatients with ABSSSIs, osteoarticular (OA), or other infections, treated with either one or two 1500 mg doses of dalbavancin, for different scheduled periods. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method was used to measure total DBV concentrations. PK/PD parameters and the clinical and microbiological features of this cohort were evaluated in order to investigate the best predictors of treatment success in real-life settings. Of the 76 screened patients, 41 completed the PK study. Long-term PK was comparable to previous studies and showed significant differences between genders and dosing schedules. Few adverse events were observed, and treatment success was achieved in the vast majority of patients. Failure was associated with lower PK parameters, particularly C_max. Concluding, we were able to describe DBV PK and predictors of treatment success in selected infections in this cohort, finding DBV C_max as a possible candidate for therapeutic drug-monitoring purposes, as well as highlighting the dual-dose one-week-apart treatment as the optimal choice for OA infections.

Comparative efficacy of dalbavancin alone and with rifampicin against in vitro biofilms in a pharmacodynamic model with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

The anti-biofilm efficacy of dalbavancin has been evaluated in static models. Using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, we evaluated the comparative activity of dalbavancin alone and with rifampicin against biofilm-embedded methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).

METHODS

Two MRSA strains (HUB-4/HUB-5) were evaluated with the Calgary Device System and the dynamic CDC-Biofilm Reactor over 144 h. Dosage regimens simulated the human pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin (1500mg, single dose), vancomycin (1000mg/12 h) and linezolid (600mg/12 h), alone and with rifampicin (600mg/24 h). Efficacy was evaluated by assessing log10 CFU/mL changes (ΔlogCFU/mL) and we screened for resistance.

RESULTS

The minimal biofilm inhibitory/eradication concentrations of dalbavancin were 0.25/16 mg/L (HUB-4) and 0.25/8mg/L (HUB-5), respectively. In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, dalbavancin alone showed limited efficacy, but without resistance developing. Adding rifampicin improved the activities of dalbavancin, vancomycin, and linezolid, but rifampicin-resistant strains appeared over time in all cases. Dalbavancin-rifampicin was bactericidal against HUB-4 in the absence of resistance at 72 h and 144 h (ΔlogCFU/mL: -3.54±0.83, -4.32±0.12, respectively), an effect that was only achieved by linezolid-rifampicin at 144h (-3.33 ± 0.66). Against HUB-5, dalbavancin-rifampicin activity was impaired by rifampicin resistance to a greater extent than other combinations and had no bactericidal effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-biofilm efficacy of dalbavancin was improved significantly by adding rifampicin. Although no dalbavancin resistance occurred, rifampicin resistance appeared in all combination therapies and decreased their efficacy over time. Dalbavancin-rifampicin in vitro treatment appears as promising anti-biofilm therapy, but further studies should evaluate the in vivo efficacy and the risk of resistance.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides

The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.

Role of Extracellular DNA in Dalbavancin Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Biofilms in Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become the leading cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Biofilm production further complicates patient treatment, contributing to increased bacterial persistence and antibiotic tolerance. The study aimed to explore the efficacy of different antibiotics on biofilm-producing MRSA isolated from patients with SSTI. A total of 32 MRSA strains were collected from patients with SSTI. The MIC and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) were measured in planktonic and biofilm growth. The study showed that dalbavancin, linezolid, and vancomycin all inhibited MRSA growth at their EUCAST susceptible breakpoint. Of the MRSA strains, 87.5% (n = 28) were strong biofilm producers (SBPs), while only 12.5% (n = 4) were weak biofilm producers (WBPs). The MBEC90 values for dalbavancin were significantly lower than those of linezolid and vancomycin in all tested strains. We also found that extracellular DNA (eDNA) contributes to the initial microbial attachment and biofilm formation. The amount of eDNA differed among MRSA strains and was significantly higher in those isolates with high dalbavancin and vancomycin tolerance. Exogenously added DNA increased the MBEC90 and protection of biofilm cells from dalbavancin activity. Of note, the relative abundance of eDNA was higher in MRSA biofilms exposed to MBEC90 dalbavancin than in untreated MRSA biofilms and those exposed to sub-MIC90. Overall, dalbavancin was the most active antibiotic against MRSA biofilms at concentrations achievable in the human serum. Moreover, the evidence of a drug-related increase of eDNA and its contribution to antimicrobial drug tolerance reveals novel potential targets for antibiofilm strategies against MRSA. IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) worldwide. In addition, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is increasingly frequent in postoperative infections and responsible for a large number of hospital readmissions and deaths. Biofilm formation by S. aureus is a primary risk factor in SSTIs, due to a higher antibiotic tolerance. Our study showed that the biofilm-forming capacity varied among MRSA strains, although strong biofilm producers were significantly more abundant than weak biofilm producer strains. Notably, dalbavancin demonstrated a potent antibiofilm activity at concentrations achievable in human serum. Nevertheless, dalbavancin activity was affected by an increased concentration of extracellular DNA in the biofilm matrix. This study provides novel insight for designing more targeted therapeutic strategies against MRSA and to prevent or eradicate harmful biofilms.

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.

A Dalbavancin Lock Solution Can Reduce Enterococcal Biofilms After Freezing

Introduction

We previously demonstrated the efficacy of a frozen dalbavancin–heparin (DH) lock solution against biofilms of staphylococci. However, as enterococci also commonly cause catheter-related bloodstream infections (C-RBSI), we assessed the bioactivity of frozen dalbavancin (D) and DH against enterococci.

Methods

Over 6 months, we compared the bioactivity of a solution of DH (1 mg/ml) with that of D in terms of cfu counts and metabolic activity against biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium (four strains each). For each solution, we individually compared results obtained at each time point (months 3 and 6) with baseline (month 0). We also compared the median DH value of each variable at baseline and at months 3 and 6 of freezing with the values obtained for D alone. We used both statistical and clinical criteria when results were within 25% of the reference value.

Results

At the end of the experiment (month 6), neither a statistically nor a clinically significant reduction in the bioactivity of D solution was observed in terms of cfu count and metabolic activity against enterococcal biofilms. Regarding the DH solution, we found both statistical and clinical significance in the median percentage reduction in metabolic activity between months 0 and 6 in E. faecalis strains (51.8% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.007). Moreover, after freezing, the DH solution lost significant bioactivity compared with the D solution, especially in E. faecalis.

Conclusion

A dalbavancin lock solution can be frozen for up to 6 months with no negative effect on its bioactivity against enterococcal biofilms. However, when combined with heparin, its efficacy was reduced. Therefore, we recommend that if lock therapy with frozen dalbavancin is used in the management of enterococcal C-RBSI, heparin should be added simultaneously at the time of catheter lock.

In vitro additive effects of dalbavancin and rifampicin against biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus

Dalbavancin is a novel glycopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). It is characterized by a potent activity against numerous Gram-positive pathogens, a long elimination half-life and a favorable safety profile. Most recently, its application for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) was introduced. The aim of this study was to proof our hypothesis, that dalbavancin shows superior efficacy against staphylococcal biofilms on polyethylene (PE) disk devices compared with vancomycin and additive behavior in combination with rifampicin. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were formed on PE disk devices for 96 h and subsequently treated with dalbavancin, vancomycin, rifampicin and dalbavancin-rifampicin combination at different concentrations. Quantification of antibacterial activity was determined by counting colony forming units (CFU/ml) after sonification of the PE, serial dilution of the bacterial suspension and plating on agar-plates. Biofilms were additionally life/dead-stained and visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Dalbavancin presented superior anti-biofilm activity compared to vancomycin. Additive effects of the combination dalbavancin and rifampicin were registered. Dalbavancin combined with rifampicin presents promising anti-biofilm activity characteristics in vitro. Further in vivo studies are necessary to establish recommendations for the general use of dalbavancin in the treatment of PJIs.

Biofilm-Related Infections in Gram-Positive Bacteria and the Potential Role of the Long-Acting Agent Dalbavancin

Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are a major public health problem due to their increasing resistance to antibiotics. Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species' resistance and pathogenicity are enhanced by their ability to form biofilm. The biofilm lifestyle represents a significant obstacle to treatment because bacterial cells become highly tolerant to a wide range of antimicrobial compounds normally effective against their planktonic forms. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies targeting biofilms are urgently needed. The lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin is a long-acting agent for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by a broad range of Gram-positive pathogens. Recent studies have shown promising activity of dalbavancin against Gram-positive biofilms, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci. This review outlines the mechanisms regulating biofilm development in Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species and the clinical impact of biofilm-related infections. In addition, it discusses the clinical implications and potential therapeutic perspectives of the long-acting drug dalbavancin against biofilm-forming Gram-positive pathogens.

Real-World Use of Dalbavancin in the Era of Empowerment of Outpatient Antimicrobial Treatment: A Careful Appraisal Beyond Approved Indications Focusing on Unmet Clinical Needs

Dalbavancin is a novel, long-acting lipoglycopeptide characterized by a long elimination half-life coupled with excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positives. Although it is currently approved only for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, an ever-growing amount of evidence supports the efficacy of dalbavancin as a long-term therapy in osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections. This article provides a critical reappraisal of real-world use of dalbavancin for off-label indications. A search strategy using specific keywords (dalbavancin, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, long-term suppressive therapy, bloodstream infection, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile) until April 2021 was performed on the PubMed-MEDLINE database. As for other novel antibiotics, a conundrum between approved indications and potential innovative therapeutic uses has emerged for dalbavancin as well. The promising efficacy in challenging scenarios (i.e., osteomyelitis, endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections), coupled with the unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, makes dalbavancin a valuable alternative to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of long-term Gram-positive infections. This makes dalbavancin valuable in the current COVID-19 scenario, in which hospitalization and territorial medicine empowerment are unavoidable.

Dalbavancin for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review

Dalbavancin (DAL) is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against a very wide range of Gram-positive microorganisms. It also has unique pharmacokinetic properties, namely a prolonged half-life (around 181 h), which allows a convenient weekly dosing regimen, and good diffusion in bone tissue. These features have led to off-label use of dalbavancin in the setting of bone and joint infection, including prosthetic joint infections (PJI). In this narrative review, we go over the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of DAL, along with published in vitro and in vivo experimental models evaluating its activity against biofilm-embedded bacteria. We also examine published experience of osteoarticular infection with special attention to DAL and PJI.

Genomic and in vitro pharmacodynamic analysis of rifampicin resistance in multidrug-resistant canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing concern in canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius dermatitis. Treatment with rifampicin (RFP) is considered only in meticillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MDR-MRSP).

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To determine an optimal RFP dosing for MDR-MRSP treatment without induction of RFP resistance and identify causal mutations for antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Time-kill assays were performed in a control isolate and three MDR-MRSP isolates at six clinically relevant concentrations [32 to 1,024 × MIC (the minimum inhibitory concentration)]. Whole-genome resequencing and bioinformatic analysis were performed in the resistant strains developed in this assay.

RESULTS

The genomic analysis identified nine antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in MDR-MRSP isolates, which are responsible for resistance to seven classes of antibiotics. RFP activity against all four isolates was consistent with a time-dependent and bacteriostatic response. RFP resistance was observed in six of the 28 time-kill assays, including concentrations 64 × MIC in MDR-MRSP1 isolates at 24 h, 32 × MIC in MDR-MRSP2 at 48 h, 32 × MIC in MDR-MRSP3 at 48 h and 256 × MIC in MDR-MRSP3 at 24 h. Genome-wide mutation analyses in these RFP-resistant strains discovered the causal mutations in the coding region of the rpoB gene.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A study has shown that 6 mg/kg per os results in plasma concentrations of 600-1,000 × MIC of S. pseudintermedius. Based on our data, this dose should achieve the minimum MIC (×512) to prevent RFP resistance development; therefore, we recommend a minimum daily dose of 6 mg/kg for MDR-MRSP pyoderma treatment when limited antibiotic options are available.

Dalbavancin Efficacy and Impact on Hospital Length-of-Stay and Treatment Costs in Different Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

Background and Objectives

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin therapy on both hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and treatment-related costs, as well as to describe the clinical outcome, in a retrospective cohort of patients with diverse Gram-positive bacterial infections, hospitalized in different specialty Units.

Methods

From July 2017 to July 2019, clinical and sociodemographic data were collected for all hospitalized patients switched to dalbavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. LOS and treatment-related costs were assessed and compared to a hypothetical scenario where the initial standard antimicrobial therapy would have been administered in hospital for the same duration as dalbavancin.

Results

A total of 50 patients were enrolled. The observed infections were: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs, 12 patients), complicated ABSSSIs (eight patients), osteoarticular infections (18 patients), vascular graft or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections (12 patients). After a median of 14 [interquartile range (IQR) 7–28] days, the in-hospital antimicrobial therapy was switched to dalbavancin 1500 mg. When appropriate, considering the site and the clinical course of the infection, 1500 mg doses were repeated every 14 days until recovery. Overall, 49/50 (98%) patients reported clinical success at the end of therapy. No relapses were observed in 37 patients for whom a median follow-up of 150 (IQR 30–180) days was available. By switching to dalbavancin, a median of €8,259 (IQR 5644–17,270) and 14 hospital days (IQR 22–47) per patient were saved.

Conclusions

In this experience, the use of dalbavancin contributed to shorten LOS and treatment-related costs, especially in difficult Gram-positive infections requiring prolonged therapy.

New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis

Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data.

Controversy about the Role of Rifampin in Biofilm Infections: Is It Justified?

Rifampin is a potent antibiotic against staphylococcal implant-associated infections. In the absence of implants, current data suggest against the use of rifampin combinations. In the past decades, abundant preclinical and clinical evidence has accumulated supporting its role in biofilm-related infections.In the present article, experimental data from animal models of foreign-body infections and clinical trials are reviewed. The risk for emergence of rifampin resistance and multiple drug interactions are emphasized. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing no beneficial effect of rifampin in patients with acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection treated with prosthesis retention is critically reviewed and data interpreted. Given the existing strong evidence demonstrating the benefit of rifampin, the conduction of an adequately powered RCT with appropriate definitions and interventions would probably not comply with ethical standards.

In Vitro Study To Evaluate the Bioactivity of Freezing a Heparin-Based Dalbavancin Lock Solution

The use of dalbavancin as a catheter lock solution must be addressed in depth before implementation in clinical practice. We assessed whether a heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution could be frozen in single-dose vials for 6 months without affecting its bioactivity against biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Over 6 months, we tested the bioactivity of a frozen solution of dalbavancin (≈1 mg/ml) plus heparin (60 IU) in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 (MRSE). The Anti-Xa assay was also performed to assess whether the anticoagulant activity of heparin was reduced under freezing. Every month, we compared the mean value of each variable with that obtained at baseline (before freezing, month 0) using both clinical criteria (values were within 25% of the baseline value) and statistical criteria (linear mixed models). At the end of the experiment (month 6), neither a clinically nor a statistically significant reduction in the bioactivity of dalbavancin-heparin solution was observed in terms of CFU counts and metabolic activity against biofilm of MRSA. Regarding MRSE, considering the clinical criteria, neither CFU counts nor metabolic activity decreased significantly. However, the reduction was statistically significant for all variables. Anti-Xa values (mean [standard deviation] international units per milliliter) for heparin in combination with dalbavancin were within 25% of the heparin-water value. A heparin-based dalbavancin lock solution can be frozen for up to 6 months with no effect on its bioactivity against MRSA and MRSE biofilms.

Antibacterial, pro-angiogenic and pro-osteointegrative zein-bioactive glass/copper based coatings for implantable stainless steel aimed at bone healing

Stainless steel implants are suitable candidates for bone replacement due to their cytocompatibility and mechanical resistance, but they suffer from lack of bioactivity and are prone to bacterial infections. Accordingly, to overcome those limitations, in this study we developed by electrophoretic deposition (EPD), an innovative surface coating made of (i) zein, a natural fibroblast-friendly polymer, (ii) bioactive glass, a pro-osteogenic inorganic material and (iii) copper containing bioactive glass, an antibacterial and pro-angiogenic material. FESEM images confirmed that porous, uniform and free of cracks coatings were obtained by EPD; moreover, coatings were resistant to mechanical stress as demonstrated by the tape test, resulting in a 4B classification of adhesion to the substrate. The coatings were cytocompatible as indicated by metabolism evaluation of human fibroblasts, endothelial cells and mature or progenitor osteoblasts cultivated in direct contact with the specimens. They also maintained pro-osteogenic properties towards undifferentiated progenitor cells that expressed osteogenic genes after 15 days of direct cultivation. Copper conferred antibacterial properties as biofilm formation of the joint pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli was significantly reduced in comparison with copper-free coatings (p < 0.05). Moreover, this anti-infective activity resulted as targeted towards bacteria while the cells viability was preserved when cells and bacteria were cultivated in the same environment by a co-culture assay. Finally, copper ability to recruit blood vessels and to inhibit bacterial infection was confirmed in vivo where the growth of S. aureus biofilm was inhibited and the formation of new (<50 μm diameter spread) blood vessels was observed.

Difficult to treat: are there organism-dependent differences and overall risk factors in success rates for two-stage knee revision?

OBJECTIVES

Failure after two-stage procedure for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare, but devastating complication. Some authors assume a correlation of underlying organisms and recurrence rate. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci (MRS) and other organisms (quinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Candida) are meant to be "difficult to treat" (DTT) with an inferior outcome for two-stage revision. In addition to the type of bacteria, some more risk factors seem to be present. The aim of this study was (1) to detect a difference of reinfection rates between reinfection-causing groups of bacteria ["difficult to treat" (DTT), "easy to treat" (ETT) and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS)] after a two-stage procedure, and (2) find overall risk factors for reinfection in a standardized long (spacer insertion for at least 6 weeks) two-stage procedure for periprosthetic knee infection.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-seven two-stage revisions for periprosthetic knee infection were performed at one tertiary referral center. Finally, 96 patients could be included for analyses. Possible risk factors (comorbidities, prior surgery, etc.) and the types of organisms were documented. Quinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and Candida were classified as "difficult to treat" (DTT). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci were summarized as "MRS", all other organism are summarized as "easy to treat" (ETT). Statistical analyses included univariate analysis (t test, Fisher's exact test, Chi square test) and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were no statistical significant differences in recurrent infection rates between organism groups (DTT vs. ETT, p = 0.674; DTT vs. MRS, p = 0.705; ETT vs. MRS, p = 0.537). Risk factors seem to be "need of revision after first stage" (p = 0.019, OR 5.62) or completed second stage (p = 0.000, OR 29.07), numbers of surgeries (p = 0.028) and alcohol abuse (p = 0.019, OR 5.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision needed during or after a two-stage exchange, numbers of surgeries and alcohol abuse are risk factors for recurrence, a different recurrence rates between organism-groups cannot be shown. The absence of significant differences in recurrence rates points to the importance of the individuality of each periprosthetic infection case: a reduction of necessary surgeries (with a thorough debridement, appropriate antibiotic addition to spacers) and the control of comorbidities (alcohol abuse) appear to be essential components of a two-stage exchange.

Effect of Dalbavancin on Staphylococcal Biofilms When Administered Alone or in Combination With Biofilm-Detaching Compounds

Microorganisms grown in biofilms are more resistant to antimicrobial treatment and immune system attacks compared to their planktonic forms. In fact, infections caused by biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are a large threat for public health, including patients with medical devices. The aim of the current manuscript was to test the effect of dalbavancin, a recently developed lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, alone or in combination with compounds contributing to bacterial cell disaggregation, on staphylococcal biofilm formation and elimination. We used real-time impedance measurements in microtiter plates to study biofilm growth dynamics of S. aureus and S. epidermidis strains, in the absence or presence of dalbavancin, linezolid, vancomycin, cloxacillin, and rifampicin. Further experiments were undertaken to check whether biofilm-detaching compounds such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and ficin could enhance dalbavancin efficiency. Real-time dose–response experiments showed that dalbavancin is a highly effective antimicrobial, preventing staphylococcal biofilm formation at low concentrations. Minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations were up to 22 higher compared to standard E-test values. Dalbavancin was the only antimicrobial that could halt new biofilm formation on established biofilms compared to the other four antibiotics. The addition of NAC decreased dalbavancin efficacy while the combination of dalbavancin with ficin was more efficient than antibiotic alone in preventing growth once the biofilm was established. Results were confirmed by classical biofilm quantification methods such as crystal violet (CV) staining and viable colony counting. Thus, our data support the use of dalbavancin as a promising antimicrobial to treat biofilm-related infections. Our data also highlight that synergistic and antagonistic effects between antibiotics and biofilm-detaching compounds should be carefully tested in order to achieve an efficient treatment that could prevent both biofilm formation and disruption.

Can dalbavancin be used as a catheter lock solution?

Purpose. The new lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin has only been approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. However, its alternative use as a catheter lock solution could facilitate the conservative management of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Our objective was to assess the stability and activity of dalbavancin alone and in combination with heparin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) biofilms. We also compared the results with those obtained with vancomycin alone and in combination with heparin.Methodology. We used a 96-well plate in vitro model based on 24 h biofilms of MRSA and MRSE (ATCC 43300, ATCC 35984 and one clinical strain of each). The biofilms were exposed to dalbavancin (0.128 mg ml^-1) and vancomycin (5 mg ml^-1) alone and in combination with heparin (60 IU). The median percentage reductions in metabolic activity, biomass, bacterial load, and cell viability for each solution were compared.Results. Dalbavancin combined with heparin significantly reduced the median [interquartile range (IQR)] percentage of metabolic activity in MRSA biofilms compared with vancomycin [90.0 % (70.4-92.9 %) versus 35.0 % (14.8-59.6 %), P=0.006]. For the remaining variables studied, the combination was not inferior to vancomycin for MRSA and MRSE.Conclusions. Dalbavancin proved to be active against MRSA and MRSE biofilms. The combination of dalbavancin with heparin is a promising catheter lock solution that has the advantage of locking the catheter at home for 7 days.

French national cohort of first use of dalbavancin: A high proportion of off-label use

Dalbavancin is a glycopeptide antibiotic with a long half-life, recently marketed in Europe for skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), but its real-life use is not well known. The aim of this study was to describe all first prescriptions in France over an 16-month period. A retrospective study on all adult patients receiving at least one dose of dalbavancin from 1 June 2017 to 31 September 2018 was performed (75 patients from 29 French hospitals). Data were collected via a standard questionnaire. Failure was defined as persistence or reappearance of signs of infection, and/or switch to suppressive antibiotic treatment, and/or death from infection. The main indications were bone and joint infection (BJI) (64.0%), endocarditis (25.3%), and SSTI (17.3%). The main bacteria involved were Staphylococcus aureus (51.4%), including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (19.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (44.4%). Median minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for staphylococci to vancomycin and dalbavancin ranged from 0.875-2.0 mg/L and 0.032-0.064 mg/L, respectively. Dalbavancin was used after a mean of 2.3 ± 1.2 lines of antimicrobial treatment. The main treatment regimens for dalbavancin were a two-dose regimen (1500 mg each) in 38 cases (50.7%) and a single-dose regimen (1500 mg) in 13 cases (17.3%). Overall, at the patient's last visit, clinical cure was observed in 54/68 patients, whilst failure was observed in 14/68 patients. First use of dalbavancin in France was mostly off-label. Most were due to BJI, often as rescue therapy for severe infections. Even in off-label situations, dalbavancin appears safe and effective.

Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections

Rifampin has been used as an agent in combination therapy in orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) for almost three decades. The aim of this review is to provide data regarding the role of rifampin against biofilm infection in vitro, in animal models, and in clinical ODRI. Available data are gathered in order to present the rational use of rifampin combinations in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The role of rifampin is well defined in patients with PJI and is indicated in those who fulfill the Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria for debridement and implant retention or one-stage exchange. It should be used with care because of the danger of rapid emergence of resistance. Potential drug interactions should be considered.

Staphylococcus aureus versus Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic joint infection-Outcome analysis of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-susceptible strains

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a major complication in total joint arthroplasty. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci are known to cause the majority of all PJIs. This study aimed to analyze the eradication rates of S. aureus and S. epidermidis with methicillin susceptibility and methicillin resistance in a 2-stage therapy algorithm. Seventy-four patients with PJI caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRSE), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSSE) were included, and the outcome was analyzed retrospectively. After a minimal follow-up of 2 years, n = 56 patients (75.7%) were definitively free of infection. The analysis revealed significant differences between the groups, with eradication rates as follows: MSSA (92.6%), MSSE (95.2%), MRSA (80%), and MRSE (54.2%). MRSE showed a significantly lower rate of patients graded as "definitively free of infection" as compared to patients with infections caused by MSSA, MSSE, and MRSA.

Comparative efficacy and safety of antibiotics used to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: Results of a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This NMA compared the efficacy and safety between IV antibiotics that are used in the current standard of care for managing adult patients (≥18 years of age) with ABSSSI.

METHODS

Comparators were chosen on the basis that both direct and indirect comparisons between the interventions of interest could be performed. Outcomes of the analysis were selected on the basis that they are frequently measured and reported in trials involving ABSSSI patients, and only published randomised control trials of any size and duration and with any blinding status were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The NMA was performed using both a fixed-effect and random-effect model. Efficacy-related endpoints were (1) clinical treatment success and (2) microbiological success at TOC visit. Safety-related endpoints were (1) number of discontinuations due to AEs/SAEs, (2) patients experiencing AEs, (3) patients experiencing SAEs and (4) all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Study interventions included daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid and tigecycline. Vancomycin was the comparator in all studies, except in two where it was linezolid and teicoplanin. The NMA showed that irrespective of patient subgroup, the likelihood of clinical and microbiological success with dalbavancin was statistically similar to the comparators studied. No statistically significant differences were observed between dalbavancin and any of the comparators in the discontinuation rate due to AEs/SAEs. In contrast, dalbavancin was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of experiencing an AE than linezolid, a significantly lower likelihood of experiencing a SAE than vancomycin and daptomycin, and a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality than vancomycin, linezolid and tigecycline.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin affords a promising, new alternative IV antimicrobial agent which is as effective as traditional therapies, but with the added benefit of enabling clinicians to treat patients with ABSSSI in different organisational settings. Notwithstanding, any introduction of an effective treatment with a differential mode of administration into healthcare systems must be followed by a change in clinical practice and patient management in order to fully achieve desirable economic outcomes.

Dalbavancin is active in vitro against biofilms formed by dalbavancin-susceptible enterococci

We tested the in vitro activity of dalbavancin, vancomycin and daptomycin against 83 enterococcal isolates in planktonic and biofilm states. The MIC₉₀ for vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis was 0.125 and 4μg/mL for dalbavancin and daptomycin, respectively. For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, the MIC₉₀ was >16 and 2μg/mL for dalbavancin and daptomycin, respectively. Dalbavancin minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) for vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant isolates were ≤0.25 and >16μg/mL, respectively. The daptomycin MBIC₉₀ for all isolates was 4μg/mL. For E. faecalis and E. faecium, dalbavancin minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) for vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant isolates were ≤4 and >16μg/mL, respectively, whereas vancomycin MBBCs were >128μg/mL for all isolates, and daptomycin MBBC₉₀ values for both species were 128μg/mL. In summary, dalbavancin exhibited in vitro activity against all tested isolates of vancomycin-susceptible, but not against vancomycin-resistant enterococci; activity was observed in both the planktonic and biofilm states.

Biodegradable rifampicin-releasing coating of surgical meshes for the prevention of bacterial infections

Polypropylene mesh implants are routinely used to repair abdominal wall defects or incisional hernia. However, complications associated with mesh implantation, such as mesh-related infections, can cause serious problems and may require complete surgical removal. Hence, the aim of the present study was the development of a safe and efficient coating to reduce postoperative mesh infections. Biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide acid) microspheres loaded with rifampicin as an antibacterial agent were prepared through single emulsion evaporation method. The particle size distribution (67.93±3.39 μm for rifampicin-loaded microspheres and 64.43±3.61 μm for unloaded microspheres) was measured by laser diffraction. Furthermore, the encapsulation efficiency of rifampicin (61.5%±2.58%) was detected via ultraviolet–visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy. The drug release of rifampicin-loaded microspheres was detected by UV/Vis spectroscopy over a period of 60 days. After 60 days, 92.40%±3.54% of the encapsulated rifampicin has been continuously released. The viability of BJ fibroblasts after incubation with unloaded and rifampicin-loaded microspheres was investigated using an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, which showed no adverse effects on the cells. Furthermore, the antibacterial impact of rifampicin-loaded microspheres and mesh implants, coated with the antibacterial microspheres, was investigated using an agar diffusion model with Staphylococcus aureus. The coated mesh implants were also tested in an in vivo mouse model of staphylococcal infection and resulted in a 100% protection against mesh implant infections or biofilm formation shown by macroscopic imaging, scanning electron microscopy, and histological examinations. This effective antibacterial mesh coating combining the benefit of a controlled drug delivery system and a potent antibacterial agent possesses the ability to significantly reduce postoperative implant infections.

Bacteriophage Lysin CF-301, a Potent Antistaphylococcal Biofilm Agent

Biofilms pose a unique therapeutic challenge because of the antibiotic tolerance of constituent bacteria. Treatments for biofilm-based infections represent a major unmet medical need, requiring novel agents to eradicate mature biofilms. Our objective was to evaluate bacteriophage lysin CF-301 as a new agent to target Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. We used minimum biofilm-eradicating concentration (MBEC) assays on 95 S. aureus strains to obtain a 90% MBEC (MBEC₉₀) value of ≤0.25 μg/ml for CF-301. Mature biofilms of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae were also sensitive to disruption, with MBEC₉₀ values ranging from 0.25 to 8 μg/ml. The potency of CF-301 was demonstrated against S. aureus biofilms formed on polystyrene, glass, surgical mesh, and catheters. In catheters, CF-301 removed all biofilm within 1 h and killed all released bacteria by 6 h. Mixed-species biofilms, formed by S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on several surfaces, were removed by CF-301, as were S. aureus biofilms either enriched for small-colony variants (SCVs) or grown in human synovial fluid. The antibacterial activity of CF-301 was further demonstrated against S. aureus persister cells in exponential-phase and stationary-phase populations. Finally, the antibiofilm activity of CF-301 was greatly improved in combinations with the cell wall hydrolase lysostaphin when tested against a range of S. aureus strains. In all, the data show that CF-301 is highly effective at disrupting biofilms and killing biofilm bacteria, and, as such, it may be an efficient new agent for treating staphylococcal infections with a biofilm component.

Orthopaedic biofilm infections

Many infections of the musculoskeletal system are biofilm infections that develop on non-living surfaces. Microorganisms adhere either on dead bone (sequesters) or implants. As a rule for a curative concept, chronic osteomyelitis or implant-associated bone infection must be treated with a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. If an implant is kept in place, or a new device is implanted before complete healing of infection, a biofilm-active antibiotic should be used. Rifamycins are active against biofilms of staphylococci, and fluoroquinolones against those of Gram-negative bacilli. In this review, the management of chronic osteomyelitis, periprosthetic joint infection and implant-associated osteomyelitis of long bones is presented.

Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE)

Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined. Biofilms obtained from ten MRSA and ten MRSE bloodstream isolates, collected from patients in the General Hospital of Vienna between 2012 and 2015, were incubated with dalbavancin in trypticase soy broth (TSB) in serial dilution from 0.0625 mg/l to 256 mg/l using a microtiter plate biofilm model. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ° C and 50% humidity. Biofilms were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and stained with crystal violet. Subsequently the optical density (OD₆₂₀) was used to measure the MBC, defined as the concentration of dalbavancin leading to a 50% reduction of biofilm. MBC for MRSA was 1 mg/l–4 mg/l (minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) 0.0312 mg/l–0.064 mg/l). MBC for MRSE was 2 mg/l–16 mg/l (MIC 0.023 mg/l–0.0625 mg/l). Dalbavancin successfully reduced MRSA and MRSE in biofilms, and therefore provides a promising option for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.

Evaluation of Antibiotics Active against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Based on Activity in an Established Biofilm

We used in vitro and in vivo models of catheter-associated biofilm formation to compare the relative activity of antibiotics effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the specific context of an established biofilm. The results demonstrated that, under in vitro conditions, daptomycin and ceftaroline exhibited comparable activity relative to each other and greater activity than vancomycin, telavancin, oritavancin, dalbavancin, or tigecycline. This was true when assessed using established biofilms formed by the USA300 methicillin-resistant strain LAC and the USA200 methicillin-sensitive strain UAMS-1. Oxacillin exhibited greater activity against UAMS-1 than LAC, as would be expected, since LAC is an MRSA strain. However, the activity of oxacillin was less than that of daptomycin and ceftaroline even against UAMS-1. Among the lipoglycopeptides, telavancin exhibited the greatest overall activity. Specifically, telavancin exhibited greater activity than oritavancin or dalbavancin when tested against biofilms formed by LAC and was the only lipoglycopeptide capable of reducing the number of viable bacteria below the limit of detection. With biofilms formed by UAMS-1, telavancin and dalbavancin exhibited comparable activity relative to each other and greater activity than oritavancin. Importantly, ceftaroline was the only antibiotic that exhibited greater activity than vancomycin when tested in vivo in a murine model of catheter-associated biofilm formation. These results emphasize the need to consider antibiotics other than vancomycin, most notably, ceftaroline, for the treatment of biofilm-associated S. aureus infections, including by the matrix-based antibiotic delivery methods often employed for local antibiotic delivery in the treatment of these infections.

[Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy]

In infections related to prosthetic joints and internal fixation devices, microorganisms adhere as biofim on the surface of the implant. Biofilms are not only resistant to phagocytosis, but also to most antimicrobial agents. Therefore, spontaneous cure does never occur, and antibiotics have to be given for several months. According to traditional concepts, removal of all foreign material was considered as prerequisite for cure. Yet, during the last decades, it has been shown that staphylococcal biofilms can be eliminated by rifampin combination therapy, and Gram-negative biofilms by fluoroquinolones. However, reliable biofilm elimination is only possible, if the duration of infection does not exceed 3-4 weeks. Correct total duration of the antimicrobial therapy has never been tested in a controlled trial. Currently, treatment duration is 3 (hip prosthesis) and 6 (knee prosthesis) months in patients undergoing débridement with implant retention, one-stage exchange, and two-stage exchange with a short interval of 2-3 weeks. According to a recent observational trial, a treatment duration of 2 and 3 months, respectively, is equivalent to the longer duration in patients undergoing débridement and implant retention. The optimal surgical therapy should be chosen according to a rational algorithm. It is crucial choosing the optimal surgical intervention from the beginning, because the final functional success depends on the cure by the first attempt.

Dalbavancin and Oritavancin: An Innovative Approach to the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections

Health care-associated infections, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant gram-positive organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are a growing public health threat. In 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new lipoglycopeptides, oritavancin and dalbavancin, for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. The rationale for the development of these antimicrobials was partly to aid in the battle against vancomycin resistance in both Staphylococcus and Enterococcus. Considered a subclass of the glycopeptide antibiotics, the new lipoglycopeptides have similar mechanisms of action of binding to the carboxyl terminal d-alanyl-d-alanine residue of the growing peptide chains but differ from their parent glycopeptides by the addition of lipophilic tails. This addition allows for these agents to have prolonged half-lives, giving them unique dosing profiles. In addition, by concentrating at the site of action, they have increased potency against MRSA compared with vancomycin, the current mainstay of therapy. In this review, we focus on comparing and contrasting these two new agents with regard to their pharmacology, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, safety profiles, dosage and administration, and drug and laboratory interactions, and we review the clinical trials evaluating their use.

Comparative In Vitro Activities of Oritavancin, Dalbavancin, and Vancomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in a Nondividing State

Antibacterial agents that kill nondividing bacteria may be of utility in treating persistent infections. Oritavancin and dalbavancin are bactericidal lipoglycopeptides that are approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in adults caused by susceptible Gram-positive pathogens. Using time-kill methodology, we demonstrate that oritavancin exerts bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates that are maintained in a nondividing state in vitro, whereas dalbavancin and the glycopeptide vancomycin do not.

In vitro activity of dalbavancin against biofilms of staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections

The in vitro activity of dalbavancin was tested against biofilms of 171 staphylococci associated with prosthetic joint infection. Dalbavancin minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC) values were: MBBC50 for Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1μg/mL; MBBC90 for S. aureus, 2μg/mL; MBBC90 for S. epidermidis, 4μg/mL.

Dalbavancin (BI-387) for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection

In the era of increasing antibiotic resistance, development of new agents that could provide therapeutic options for difficult to treat pathogens is vital. Dalbavancin is a new lipoglycopeptide recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. A derivative of the older glycopeptide class, chemical structure alterations resulted in a molecule with a similar mechanism of action, however, with a comparatively increased activity as reflected by organism MICs. These modifications also resulted in an antibiotic with distinctive properties that allow for once-weekly dosing in the treatment of Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and drug resistant Streptococcus spp. As the first of these long acting compounds, understanding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of agents like dalbavancin is essential for determining a place in therapy.

Dalbavancin: A Novel Lipoglycopeptide Antibiotic with Extended Activity Against Gram-Positive Infections

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). It is active against gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are consistently <0.125 µg/ml, much lower than most other anti-MRSA agents. Dalbavancin possesses an extended half-life of over 1 week, allowing an initial dose of 1000 mg followed by 500 mg 1 week later to complete a course of therapy for ABSSSI. It is approximately 95% protein bound and is widely distributed throughout the body, achieving concentrations similar to plasma levels in numerous tissues. Against MRSA, dalbavancin is 4–8 times more potent than vancomycin in vitro, and limited data suggest it possesses activity against MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin such as hVISA and VISA. Dalbavancin also possesses in vitro activity against streptococci and enterococci, although activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci is lacking. In phase 3 ABSSSI studies, dalbavancin demonstrated similar activity to vancomycin and provides a more convenient dosing regimen. Limited phase 2 data suggest dalbavancin also possesses activity in catheter-related bloodstream infections. Potential further therapeutic uses include conditions that require long-term treatment such as osteomyelitis and infective endocarditis, although data are currently lacking. The extended half-life of dalbavancin, along with its in vitro activity against gram-positive organisms with reduced susceptibility to other anti-MRSA antibiotics, suggest it could have an exciting clinical role going forward.

Antibacterial Characterization of Novel Synthetic Thiazole Compounds against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a commensal organism of companion animals that is a significant source of opportunistic infections in dogs. With the emergence of clinical isolates of S. pseudintermedius (chiefly methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP)) exhibiting increased resistance to nearly all antibiotic classes, new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Thiazole compounds have been previously shown to possess potent antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus of human and animal concern. Given the genetic similarity between S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius, this study explores the potential use of thiazole compounds as novel antibacterial agents against methicillin-sensitive S. pseudintermedius (MSSP) and MRSP. A broth microdilution assay confirmed these compounds exhibit potent bactericidal activity (at sub-microgram/mL concentrations) against both MSSA and MRSP clinical isolates while the MTS assay confirmed three compounds (at 10 μg/mL) were not toxic to mammalian cells. A time-kill assay revealed two derivatives rapidly kill MRSP within two hours. However, this rapid bactericidal activity was not due to disruption of the bacterial cell membrane indicating an alternative mechanism of action for these compounds against MRSP. A multi-step resistance selection analysis revealed compounds 4 and 5 exhibited a modest (two-fold) shift in activity over ten passages. Furthermore, all six compounds (at a subinihibitory concentration) demonstrated the ability to re-sensitize MRSP to oxacillin, indicating these compounds have potential use for extending the therapeutic utility of β-lactam antibiotics against MRSP. Metabolic stability analysis with dog liver microsomes revealed compound 3 exhibited an improved physicochemical profile compared to the lead compound. In addition to this, all six thiazole compounds possessed a long post-antibiotic effect (at least 8 hours) against MRSP. Collectively the present study demonstrates these synthetic thiazole compounds possess potent antibacterial activity against both MSSP and MRSP and warrant further investigation into their use as novel antimicrobial agents.