In vitro efficacy of imipenem-relebactam and cefepime-AAI101 against a global collection of ESBL-positive and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Potentially effective antimicrobial treatment for pneumonia caused by isolates of carbapenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex species: what can we expect in the future?

INTRODUCTION

Acinetobacter baumannii complex (Abc) is currently a significant cause of difficult-to-treat pneumonia. Due to the high prevalence rates of carbapenem- and extensively drug-resistant (CR, XDR) phenotypes, limited antibiotic options are available for the effective treatment of pneumonia caused by CR/XDR-Abc.

AREAS COVERED

In vitro susceptibility data, relevant pharmacokinetic profiles (especially the penetration ratios from plasma into epithelial-lining fluid), and pharmacodynamic indices of key antibiotics against CR/XDR-Abc are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Doubling the routine intravenous maintenance dosages of conventional tigecycline (100 mg every 12 h) and minocycline (200 mg every 12 h) might be recommended for the effective treatment of pneumonia caused by CR/XDR-Abc. Nebulized polymyxin E, novel parenteral rifabutin BV100, and new polymyxin derivatives (SPR206, MRX-8, and QPX9003) could be considered supplementary combination options with other antibiotic classes. Regarding other novel antibiotics, the potency of sulbactam-durlobactam (1 g/1 g infused over 3 h every 6 h intravenously) combined with imipenem-cilastatin, and the β-lactamase inhibitor xeruborbactam, is promising. Continuous infusion of full-dose cefiderocol is likely an effective treatment regimen for CR/XDR-Abc pneumonia. Zosurabalpin exhibits potent anti-CR/XDR-Abc activity in vitro, but its practical use in clinical therapy remains to be evaluated. The clinical application of antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages requires validation.

In vitro activity of cefepime-enmetazobactam on carbapenem-resistant gram negatives

OBJECTIVES

Cefepime-enmetazobactam is a new β-lactam/βlactamase inhibitor combination with broad-spectrum activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-enmetazobactam towards a collection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii compared to the other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

METHODS

The MIC of cefepime, cefepime-enmetazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, and ertapenem were determined by broth microdilution on 2212 CRE, including 2089 carbapenemase producers (1000 OXA-48-like, 49 KPC, 697 NDM, 180 VIM, 1 IMP, 9 IMI, and 158 multiple carbapenemases) and 123 CRE that do not produce carbapenemase received at the French National Reference Centre (from March 1, 2023 to August 31, 2023), 50 P. aeruginosa, and 30 A. baumannii. All strains were fully sequenced.

RESULTS

We confirmed the absence of inhibitory activity of enmetazobactam towards metallo-β-lactamases. Cefepime-enmetazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited a similar susceptibility (96.7% vs. 99.5%, respectively) on OXA-48-producers. Cefepime-enmetazobactam exhibited 66.9% and 63.3% susceptibility for CRE non-EPC and KPC, whereas those rates rose to 96.7%/95.9%, 93.4%/95.9%, and 95.9%/98.0% for ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, respectively. Low MICs (≤0.25 mg/L) were obtained for ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC variants. Cefepime-enmetazobactam did not display a significant added value when compared with cefepime alone on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

DISCUSSION

OXA-48 producers displayed high susceptibility to cefepime-enmetazobactam, which is similar to ceftazidime-avibactam, including for OXA-48 producers that coproduce a ceftazidime hydrolyzing enzyme (extended-spectrum β-lactamases or AmpC). In vivo experiments have to be implemented to confirm if cefepime-enmetazobactam might be a relevant alternative to ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections caused by OXA-48 producers.

Cefepime-Enmetazobactam: A Drug Review of a Novel Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyze the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and use of cefepime-enmetazobactam (FEP-EMT).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (January 2015 to May 2024). Search terms included: "cefepime-enmetazobactam" or "cefepime" or "enmetazobactam" or "cefepime" or "novel beta-lactamase inhibitor" and "complicated urinary tract infection" or "cUTI." Conference abstracts, bibliographies, clinical trials, and drug monographs were included for review.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant studies in English and clinical trials conducted in humans were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In February 2024, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the combination beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) FEP-EMT for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis following the completion of the Phase III ALLIUM trial comparing it to piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). The trial resulted in 79.1% of the FEP-EMT group versus 58.9% of the TZP group meeting the primary outcome of clinical cure and microbiological eradication (95% CI 21.2 [14.3 to 27.9]).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

This review describes the use of FEP-EMT for the treatment of cUTI and compares its use to other novel BL/BLI combinations including utility in drug-resistant infections.

CONCLUSIONS

FEP-EMT provides an antimicrobial option to reduce overuse of carbapenems for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae. However, unlike other novel BL/BLI combinations, its limited spectrum of antibacterial effect for more difficult-to-treat pathogens and cost may also impact its overall utilization.

Novel agents in development for the treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections

INTRODUCTION

Several novel agents are in advanced stages of clinical development, potentially expanding our treatment options against third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including those pathogens for which the current number of effective treatments is limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on agents that have completed or ongoing phase-3 studies. A PubMed search was conducted up to 31 May 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel agents in late-stage clinical development belong to the β-lactam or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations class and display variable antimicrobial activity depending on the specific β-lactamases expressed by GNB, particularly carbapenemases. While many of these novel agents demonstrate in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant GNB, their efficacy has mainly been evaluated in phase-3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) for infections caused by carbapenem-susceptible GNB. Although evidence from real-world observational studies is generally less robust than that from RCT, it could be crucial for updating clinical guidelines on treating carbapenem-resistant GNB with these new agents in the absence of dedicated RCT.

Cefepime/Enmetazobactam: First Approval

Cefepime/enmetazobactam (EXBLIFEP®), an intravenous (IV) antibacterial fixed-dose combination of a 4th generation cephalosporin and an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitor, is being developed by Allecra Therapeutics and ADVANZ PHARMA for the treatment of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. In February 2024, cefepime/enmetazobactam was approved in the USA for use in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pyelonephritis, caused by susceptible strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae complex. In March 2024, cefepime/enmetazobactam was approved in the EU for use in adults for the treatment of cUTI, including pyelonephritis, and hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator associated pneumonia, and the treatment of patients with bacteraemia occurring in association with or suspected to be associated with any of these infections. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of cefepime/enmetazobactam leading to this first approval for the treatment of adults with infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Role of β-Lactamase Inhibitors as Potentiators in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Targeting Gram-Negative Bacteria

Since the discovery of penicillin, β-lactam antibiotics have commonly been used to treat bacterial infections. Unfortunately, at the same time, pathogens can develop resistance to β-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems by producing β-lactamases. Therefore, a combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors has been a promising approach to controlling β-lactam-resistant bacteria. The discovery of novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) is essential for effectively treating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore, this review discusses the development of innovative inhibitors meant to enhance the activity of β-lactam antibiotics. Specifically, this review describes the classification and characteristics of different classes of β-lactamases and the synergistic mechanisms of β-lactams and BLIs. In addition, we introduce potential sources of compounds for use as novel BLIs. This provides insights into overcoming current challenges in β-lactamase-producing bacteria and designing effective treatment options in combination with BLIs.

Antibiotic therapy for nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli infections: future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Serious infections caused by nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) pose a significant challenge for clinicians due to the limited treatment options available, which are frequently associated with issues of toxicity and unfavourable pharmacokinetic profiles. The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of the existing data concerning the ongoing development of antiinfective agents targeting NF-GNB.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several agents exhibiting efficacy against NF-GNB are under clinical investigation. Durlobactam-sulbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam emerge as promising therapeutic avenues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii . Cefepime-zidebactam may serve as a suitable treatment option for urinary tract infections caused by a wide range of NF-GNB. Cefepime-enmetazobactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity against various NF-GNB strains; however, its role as an anti- Pseudomonal agent is inadequately substantiated by available data. Xeruborbactam is a wide β-lactamase inhibitor that can be associated with a range of agents, enhancing in-vitro activity of these against many NF-GNB, including those resistant to newer, broader spectrum options. Lastly, murepavadin appears to be a potential pathogen-specific solution for severe Pseudomonas infections; however, additional investigation is necessary to establish the safety profile of this compound.

SUMMARY

Each of the novel molecules reviewed possesses an interesting range of in-vitro activity against NF-GNB. In addition, some of them have already been proved effective in vivo, underscoring their potential as future treatment options.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.

Fighting antibiotic resistance-strategies and (pre)clinical developments to find new antibacterials

Antibacterial resistance is one of the greatest threats to human health. The development of new therapeutics against bacterial pathogens has slowed drastically since the approvals of the first antibiotics in the early and mid-20^th century. Most of the currently investigated drug leads are modifications of approved antibacterials, many of which are derived from natural products. In this review, we highlight the challenges, advancements and current standing of the clinical and preclinical antibacterial research pipeline. Additionally, we present novel strategies for rejuvenating the discovery process and advocate for renewed and enthusiastic investment in the antibacterial discovery pipeline.

New tools to mitigate drug resistance in Enterobacteriaceae - Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Treatment to common bacterial infections are becoming ineffective of late, owing to the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance globally. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the most notorious microorganisms and are among the critical priority pathogens listed by WHO in 2017. These pathogens are the predominant cause of sepsis, urinary tract infections (UTIs), pneumonia, meningitis and pyogenic liver abscess. Concern arises due to the resistance of bacteria to most of the beta lactam antibiotics like penicillin, cephalosporin, monobactams and carbapenems, even to the last resort antibiotics like colistin. Preventing influx by modulation of porins, extruding the antibiotics by overexpression of efflux pumps, mutations of drug targets/receptors, biofilm formation, altering the drug molecules and rendering them ineffective are few resistance mechanisms that are adapted by Enterobacteriaeceae upon exposure to antibiotics. The situation is exacerbated due to the process of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), wherein the genes encoding resistance mechanisms are transferred to the neighbouring bacteria through plasmids/phages/uptake of free DNA. Carbapenemases, other beta lactamases and mcr genes coding for colistin resistance are widely disseminated leading to limited/no therapeutic options against those infections. Development of new antibiotics can be viewed as a possible solution but it involves major investment, time and labour despite which, the bacteria can easily adapt to the new antibiotic and evolve resistance in a relatively short time. Targeting the resistance mechanisms can be one feasible alternative to tackle these multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Removal of plasmid (plasmid curing) causing resistance, use of bacteriophages and bacteriotherapy can be other potential approaches to combat infections caused by MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The present review discusses the efficacies of these therapies in mitigating these infections, which can be potentially used as an adjuvant therapy along with existing antibiotics.

Studies on enmetazobactam clarify mechanisms of widely used β-lactamase inhibitors

β-Lactams are the most important class of antibacterials, but their use is increasingly compromised by resistance, most importantly via serine β-lactamase (SBL)-catalyzed hydrolysis. The scope of β-lactam antibacterial activity can be substantially extended by coadministration with a penicillin-derived SBL inhibitor (SBLi), i.e., the penam sulfones tazobactam and sulbactam, which are mechanism-based inhibitors working by acylation of the nucleophilic serine. The new SBLi enmetazobactam, an N-methylated tazobactam derivative, has recently completed clinical trials. Biophysical studies on the mechanism of SBL inhibition by enmetazobactam reveal that it inhibits representatives of all SBL classes without undergoing substantial scaffold fragmentation, a finding that contrasts with previous reports on SBL inhibition by tazobactam and sulbactam. We therefore reinvestigated the mechanisms of tazobactam and sulbactam using mass spectrometry under denaturing and nondenaturing conditions, X-ray crystallography, and NMR spectroscopy. The results imply that the reported extensive fragmentation of penam sulfone–derived acyl–enzyme complexes does not substantially contribute to SBL inhibition. In addition to observation of previously identified inhibitor-induced SBL modifications, the results reveal that prolonged reaction of penam sulfones with SBLs can induce dehydration of the nucleophilic serine to give a dehydroalanine residue that undergoes reaction to give a previously unobserved lysinoalanine cross-link. The results clarify the mechanisms of action of widely clinically used SBLi, reveal limitations on the interpretation of mass spectrometry studies concerning mechanisms of SBLi, and will inform the development of new SBLi working by reaction to form hydrolytically stable acyl–enzyme complexes.

Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (CRE; harboring mainly bla_KPC, bla_NDM, and bla_OXA-48-like genes), CR- or MDR/XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (production of VIM, IMP, or NDM carbapenemases combined with porin alteration), and Acinetobacter baumannii complex (producing mainly OXA-23, OXA-58-like carbapenemases), have gradually worsened and become a major challenge to public health because of limited antibiotic choice and high case-fatality rates. Diverse MDR/XDR-GNB isolates have been predominantly cultured from inpatients and hospital equipment/settings, but CRE has also been identified in community settings and long-term care facilities. Several CRE outbreaks cost hospitals and healthcare institutions huge economic burdens for disinfection and containment of their disseminations. Parenteral polymyxin B/E has been observed to have a poor pharmacokinetic profile for the treatment of CR- and XDR-GNB. It has been determined that tigecycline is suitable for the treatment of bloodstream infections owing to GNB, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a last-resort antibiotic against GNB of Ambler class A/C/D enzyme-producers and a majority of CR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, ceftolozane-tazobactam is shown to exhibit excellent in vitro activity against CR- and XDR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Several pharmaceuticals have devoted to exploring novel antibiotics to combat these troublesome XDR-GNBs. Nevertheless, only few antibiotics are shown to be effective in vitro against CR/XDR-A. baumannii complex isolates. In this era of antibiotic pipelines, strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship is as important as in-time isolation cohorts in limiting the spread of CR/XDR-GNB and alleviating the worsening trends of resistance.

Multicenter surveillance of in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline, and comparator antibiotics against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex causing bloodstream infection in Taiwan, 2020

OBJECTIVES

: To determine the in vitro activities of novel and comparator antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan.

METHODS

: Isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 335), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 316; 144 isolates with hyperviscosity characteristics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 271), Acinetobacter baumannii complex species (n = 187), and non-typhoidal Salmonella species (n = 226), Shigella species (n = 13) from miscellaneous culture sources were collected in 2020 in Taiwan. The MICs of the isolates to test antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. GeneXpert was used to detect genes encoding carbapenemases among the carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Enterobacterales isolates.

RESULTS

: The MIC values of the cefepime-enmetazobactam combination against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (MIC₉₀ ≤ 0.5 mg/L), bla_KPC-harboring E. coli isolates (0.25 mg/L; n = 2), and 80% of bla_OXA-48-like gene-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates (≤2 mg/L) were low. The MIC ranges of the cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates (irrespective of the carbapenemase type [MIC₉₀ ≤ 4 mg/L]) and carbapenem-NS or ceftolozane-tazobactam-NS P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC₉₀ value, 8 mg/L) were significantly lower than those of the cefepime-enmetazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

: The efficacy of novel antibiotics against important drug-resistant GNB must be monitored and validated during the clinical treatment of patients.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Assessment of activity and resistance mechanisms to cefepime in combination with the novel β-lactamase inhibitors zidebactam, taniborbactam and enmetazobactam against a multicenter collection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

The global distribution of carbapenemases such as KPC, MBLs and OXA-48 gives cause for concern, as these enzymes are not inhibited by classical β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs). The current development of new inhibitors is one of the most promising highlights for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. The activity of cefepime in combination with the novel BLIs zidebactam, taniborbactam and enmetazobactam was studied in a collection of 400 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). The genomes were fully sequenced and potential mechanisms of resistance to cefepime/BLI combinations were characterized. Cefepime resistance in the whole set of isolates was 79.5% (MIC_50/90 64/≥128mg/L). The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations showed the highest activity (MIC_50/90 ≤0.5/1 and ≤0.5/2 mg/L, respectively). Cefepime/zidebactam displayed high activity, regardless of the carbapenemase or ESBL considered (99% MIC ≤2 mg/L). Cefepime/taniborbactam displayed excellent activity against OXA-48- and KPC-producing Enterobacterales and lower activity against MBL-producing isolates (4 strains yielded MICs ≥16 mg/L:2 NDM producers with an insertion in PBP3, 1 VIM-1 producer with non-functional OmpK35 and 1 IMP-8 producer). Cefepime/enmetazobactam displayed the lowest activity (MIC_50/90 1/≥128 mg/L), with MICs ≥16 mg/L for 49 MBL producers, 40 OXA-48 producers (13 with amino acid changes in OmpK35/36, 4 in PBPs and 11 in RamR) and 25 KPC producers (most with an insertion in OmpK36). These results confirm the therapeutic potential of the new β-lactamase inhibitors, shedding light on the activity of cefepime and BLIs against CPE and resistance mechanisms. The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations are particularly highlighted as promising alternatives to penicillin-based inhibitors for the treatment of CPE.

Susceptibility to Imipenem/Relebactam of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from Chinese Intra-Abdominal, Respiratory and Urinary Tract Infections: SMART 2015 to 2018

Purpose

In recent years, less options are available for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The present study investigates the susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs), respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in China.

Patients and Methods

A total of 1886 P. aeruginosa and 1889 A. baumannii isolates were collected in 21 centers (7 regions) as a part of the global SMART surveillance program between 2015 and 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations using the broth microdilution methodology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Results

For P. aeruginosa, overall susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam were 84.2% at a CLSI breakpoint of ≤2 mg/L compared to 55.7% for imipenem. Susceptibility rates of imipenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa to imipenem/relebactam were 64.4% and for multidrug-resistance (MDR) P. aeruginosa susceptibility rates were increased from 25.2% for imipenem to 65.8% for imipenem/relebactam. The susceptibilities of imipenem-non-susceptible and MDR P. aeruginosa strains were similarly restored by imipenem/relebactam in non-ICU and ICU wards. The rate of imipenem-non-susceptibilities A. baumannii isolates was 79.0%, whereas the MDR rate was 81.9%. Relebactam did not change the susceptibilities of imipenem-non susceptible or MDR A. baumannii isolates.

Conclusion

Imipenem/relebactam provides a therapy option to treat infections caused by MDR or imipenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa but not A. baumannii infections in China.

Sigmoid Emax Modeling To Define the Fixed Concentration of Enmetazobactam for MIC Testing in Combination with Cefepime

The use of carbapenem antibiotics to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales expressing increasingly aggressive extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) has contributed to the emergence of carbapenem resistance. Enmetazobactam is a novel ESBL inhibitor being developed in combination with cefepime as a carbapenem-sparing option for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Cefepime-enmetazobactam checkerboard MIC profiles were obtained for a challenge panel of cefepime-resistant ESBL-producing clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sigmoid maximum effect (E_max) modeling described cefepime MICs as a function of enmetazobactam concentration with no bias. A concentration of 8 μg/ml enmetazobactam proved sufficient to restore >95% of cefepime antibacterial activity in vitro against >95% of isolates tested. These results support a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml of enmetazobactam for MIC testing.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against a Spanish nationwide collection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

Imipenem/relebactam is a novel carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, developed to act against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against a Spanish nationwide collection of CPE by testing the susceptibility of these isolates to 16 widely used antimicrobials and to determine the underlying β-lactam resistance mechanisms involved and the molecular epidemiology of carbapenemases in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical CPE isolates (n = 401) collected for 2 months from 24 hospitals in Spain were tested. MIC50, MIC90 and susceptibility/resistance rates were interpreted in accordance with the EUCAST guidelines. β-Lactam resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology were characterized by WGS.

RESULTS

For all isolates, high rates of susceptibility to colistin (86.5%; MIC50/90 = 0.12/8 mg/L), imipenem/relebactam (85.8%; MIC50/90 = 0.5/4 mg/L) and ceftazidime/avibactam (83.8%, MIC50/90 = 1/≥256 mg/L) were observed. The subgroups of isolates producing OXA-48-like (n = 305, 75.1%) and KPC-like enzymes (n = 44, 10.8%) were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.7%, MIC50/90 = 1/2 mg/L) and imipenem/relebactam (100.0%, MIC50/90 = ≤0.25/1 mg/L), respectively.The most widely disseminated high-risk clones of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae across Spain were found to be ST11, ST147, ST392 and ST15 (mostly associated with OXA-48) and ST258/512 (in all cases producing KPC).

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/relebactam, colistin and ceftazidime/avibactam were the most active antimicrobials against all CPEs. Imipenem/relebactam is a valuable addition to the antimicrobial arsenal used in the fight against CPE, particularly against KPC-producing isolates, which in all cases were susceptible to this combination.

Inhibitors of β-Lactamases. New Life of β-Lactam Antibiotics

β-Lactam antibiotics account for about 60% of all produced antibiotics. Due to a high activity and minimal side effects, they are the most commonly used class of antibacterial drugs for the treatment of various infectious diseases of humans and animals, including severe hospital infections. However, the emergence of bacteria resistant to β-lactams has led to the clinical inefficiency of these antibiotics, and as a result, their use in medicine has been limited. The search for new effective ways for overcoming the resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is an essential task. The major mechanism of bacterial resistance is the synthesis of β-lactamases (BLs) that break the antibiotic β-lactam ring. Here, we review specific inhibitors of serine β-lactamases and metallo-β-lactamases and discuss approaches for creating new inhibitors that would prolong the "life" of β-lactams.

An update on cefepime and its future role in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors for MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Cefepime, a wide-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, has been in use for the treatment of serious bacterial infections for almost 25 years. Since its clinical development, there has been a dramatic shift in its dosing, with 2 g every 8 hours being preferred for serious infections to optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations. The advent of ESBLs has become a threat to its ongoing use, although future coadministration with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) under development is an area of intense study. There are currently four new cefepime/BLI combinations in clinical development. Cefepime/zidebactam is generally active against MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in vitro and in animal studies, and cefepime/taniborbactam has activity against KPC and OXA-48 producers. Cefepime/enmetazobactam and cefepime/tazobactam are potential carbapenem-sparing agents with activity against ESBLs. Cefepime/enmetazobactam has completed Phase III and cefepime/taniborbactam is in Phase III clinical studies, where they are being tested against carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. While these combinations are promising, their role in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections can only be determined with further clinical studies.

In-vitro activity of cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline and other comparative agents against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales: results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2017-2020

This study examined the susceptibility of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales (CNSE) to cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline and other comparative agents. Non-duplicate Enterobacterales isolates from 16 Taiwanese hospitals were evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and susceptibility results were interpreted based on relevant guidelines. In total, 201 CNSE isolates were investigated, including 26 Escherichia coli isolates and 175 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Carbapenemase genes were detected in 15.4% (n=4) of E. coli isolates and 47.4% (n=83) of K. pneumoniae isolates, with the most common being bla_KPC (79.3%, 69/87), followed by bla_OXA-48-like (13.8%, 12/87). Cefiderocol was the most active agent against CNSE; only 3.8% (n=1) of E. coli isolates and 4.6% (n=8) of K. pneumoniae isolates were not susceptible to cefiderocol. Among the carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, 88.5% (n=23) and 93.7% (n=164), respectively, were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. For cefepime/zidebactam, 23 (88.5%) E. coli isolates and 155 (88.6%) K. pneumoniae isolates had MICs ≤2/2 mg/L. For cefepime/enmetazobactam, 22 (84.6%) E. coli isolates and 85 (48.6%) K. pneumoniae isolates had MICs ≤2/8 mg/L. The higher MICs of K. pneumoniae against cefepime/enmetazobactam were due to only one (1.5%) of the 67 bla_KPC-carrying isolates being susceptible. MICs of omadacycline were significantly higher than those of eravacycline and tigecycline. In summary, cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefepime/zidebactam were more effective against carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli and K. pneumoniae than other drugs, highlighting their potential as valuable therapeutics.

Antimicrobial Resistance Conferred by OXA-48 β-Lactamases: Towards a Detailed Mechanistic Understanding

OXA-48-type β-lactamases are now routinely encountered in bacterial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales These enzymes are of high and growing clinical significance due to the importance of carbapenems in treatment of health care-associated infections by Gram-negative bacteria, the wide and increasing dissemination of OXA-48 enzymes on plasmids, and the challenges posed by their detection. OXA-48 confers resistance to penicillin (which is efficiently hydrolyzed) and carbapenem antibiotics (which is more slowly broken down). In addition to the parent enzyme, a growing array of variants of OXA-48 is now emerging. The spectrum of activity of these variants varies, with some hydrolyzing expanded-spectrum oxyimino-cephalosporins. The growth in importance and diversity of the OXA-48 group has motivated increasing numbers of studies that aim to elucidate the relationship between structure and specificity and establish the mechanistic basis for β-lactam turnover in this enzyme family. In this review, we collate recently published structural, kinetic, and mechanistic information on the interactions between clinically relevant β-lactam antibiotics and inhibitors and OXA-48 β-lactamases. Collectively, these studies are starting to form a detailed picture of the underlying bases for the differences in β-lactam specificity between OXA-48 variants and the consequent differences in resistance phenotype. We focus specifically on aspects of carbapenemase and cephalosporinase activities of OXA-48 β-lactamases and discuss β-lactamase inhibitor development in this context. Throughout the review, we also outline key open research questions for future investigation.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

A Clinical Review and Critical Evaluation of Imipenem-Relebactam: Evidence to Date

Imipenem-relebactam (I-R) is a novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination given with cilastatin. It is indicated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. A literature search was completed to evaluate the evidence to date of I-R. I-R has in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. It was granted FDA approval following the promising results of two phase II clinical trials in patients with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The most common adverse drug events associated with I-R were nausea (6%), diarrhea (6%), and headache (4%). I-R is a new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that will be most likely used for patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in which there are limited or no available alternative treatment options.

Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance

The rising incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) has been recognized as a global emergency. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, epidemiology and treatment options for BSI caused by GNB with DTR, namely extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales; DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and DTR Acinetobacter baumannii.

Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Enmetazobactam Combined with Cefepime in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model

Third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are classified as critical priority pathogens, with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) as principal resistance determinants. Enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101) is a novel ESBL inhibitor developed in combination with cefepime for empirical treatment of serious Gram-negative infections in settings where ESBLs are prevalent. Cefepime-enmetazobactam has been investigated in a phase 3 trial in patients with complicated urinary tract infections or acute pyelonephritis. This study examined pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships of enmetazobactam, in combination with cefepime, for ESBL-producing isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in 26-h murine neutropenic thigh infection models. Enmetazobactam dose fractionation identified the time above a free threshold concentration (fT > C_T ) as the PK-PD index predictive of efficacy. Nine ESBL-producing isolates of K. pneumoniae, resistant to cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, were included in enmetazobactam dose-ranging studies. The isolates encoded CTX-M-type, SHV-12, DHA-1, and OXA-48 β-lactamases and covered a cefepime-enmetazobactam MIC range from 0.06 to 2 μg/ml. Enmetazobactam restored the efficacy of cefepime against all isolates tested. Sigmoid curve fitting across the combined set of isolates identified enmetazobactam PK-PD targets for stasis and for a 1-log₁₀ bioburden reduction of 8% and 44% fT > 2 μg/ml, respectively, with a concomitant cefepime PK-PD target of 40 to 60% fT > cefepime-enmetazobactam MIC. These findings support clinical dose selection and breakpoint setting for cefepime-enmetazobactam.