In vitro activity of omadacycline against clinical isolates of Nocardia

Nocardiosis typically requires a prolonged treatment duration of ≥6 months and initial combination therapy with 2-3 antibiotics. First-line regimens for nocardiosis are associated with considerable toxicity; therefore, alternative therapies are needed. Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline with broad antimicrobial activity whose in vitro activity against Nocardia species has not been formally assessed. The in vitro potency of omadacycline was evaluated against 300 Nocardia clinical isolates by broth microdilution. The most common Nocardia species tested were N. cyriacigeorgica (21%), N. nova (20%), and N. farcinica (12%). The most common specimens were respiratory (178 isolates, 59%) and wound (57 isolates, 19%). Omadacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) across all Nocardia species ranged from 0.06 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL, with an MIC50 of 2 µg/mL and MIC90 of 4 µg/mL. The lowest MICs were found among N. paucivorans (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 0.25 µg/mL), N. asiatica (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. abscessus complex (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. beijingensis (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL), and N. otitidiscaviarum (MIC50 = 1 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL). The highest MICs were found among N. farcinica (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL, MIC90 = 8 µg/mL). In vitro potency differed by species among Nocardia clinical isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential clinical utility of omadacycline for nocardiosis.

Anti-psychotic Nature of Antibiotics: Vancomycin and Omadacycline Combination Ameliorating Stress in a Zebrafish Model

Background Stress affects mental health significantly and is a ubiquitous feature of contemporary living. Among the possible antibiotics are omadacycline and vancomycin, whose anti-inflammatory properties have also been thoroughly documented in recent research. The goal of the current study was to examine their complex involvement in the brain's stress response circuits and how they modulate stress. An established model organism that provides a useful platform for examining stress-induced behaviors and possible therapeutic approaches is the zebrafish. To investigate how dopamine affects the stress response, we used a zebrafish model that was exposed to stress. Methodology For three minutes, zebrafish were continually subjected to chasing stress. They were then given antibiotic combinations of 50 µg/mL each of vancomycin and omadacycline at various ratios of 1:1, 3:1, and 3:1. Behavior alterations, including freezing bouts, top-bottom ratios, and latency periods, were analyzed and contrasted with control groups. ImageJ software was utilized to analyze the video footage of the fish. Results The study showed that the combination of omadacycline and vancomycin greatly reduced the behaviors in zebrafish caused by stress. They chose their concentration (50 µg/mL) according to the lethal concentration 50% result. By shortening the latency time and increasing the intensity of breezing sessions, these chemicals restored almost normal activity. There was statistical significance in the outcomes. The results show that the combination of vancomycin and omadacycline may have an anti-psychotic impact on zebrafish behaviors brought on by stress. Their control of stress reactions is consistent with their known roles in the reward and stress circuits of the brain. These results emphasize the complex interactions between neurotransmitter systems and the control of stress, highlighting the therapeutic potential of dopamine in the treatment of stress-related mental illnesses. Conclusions The combination of vancomycin and omadacycline has been shown to have anti-psychotic effects, which presents potential opportunities for the development of new treatment strategies for mental diseases associated with stress. To fully understand the specific processes underpinning their involvement in stress management and how they relate to mental illnesses in humans, more investigation is necessary.

Omadacycline dihydrate, C29H40N4O7·2H2O, from X-ray powder diffraction data

The crystal structure of the title compound {systematic name: (4S,4aS,5aR,12aR)-4,7-bis-(di-methyl-amino)-9-[(2,2-di-methyl-propyl-amino)-meth-yl]-1,10,11,12a-tetra-hydroxy-3,12-dioxo-4a,5,5a,6-tetra-hydro-4H-tetra-cene-2-carb-oxamide dihydrate, C29H40N4O7·2H2O} has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data: it crystallizes in space group R3 with a = 24.34430 (7), c = 14.55212 (4) Å, V = 7468.81 (2) Å3 and Z = 9. Most of the hydrogen bonds are intra-molecular, but two classical N-H⋯O inter-molecular hydrogen bonds (along with probable weak C-H⋯O and C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds) link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional framework. The framework contains voids, which contain disordered water mol-ecules. Keto-enol tautomerism is apparently important in this mol-ecule, and the exact mol-ecular structure is ambiguous.

Omadacycline for the Treatment of Severe Chlamydia psittaci Pneumonia Complicated with Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Background

Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) is a pathogen that is seldom implicated in community-acquired pneumonia and is rarely linked to severe pneumonia. Reports of severe C. psittaci pneumonia accompanied by Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) are scarce. Tetracyclines are the preferred therapeutic approach for psittacosis. Omadacycline, a novel tetracycline, demonstrates strong antibacterial efficacy against typical bacteria and atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci. However, its application in the treatment of psittacosis pneumonia remains constrained.

Case Presentation

A 77-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital presenting with symptoms of fever, low back pain, and headache. The diagnosis of C. psittaci was established through the utilization of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Initial administration of moxifloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and doxycycline proved to be ineffective. Subsequent omadacycline leaded to the successful resolution of fever and dyspnea. However, after the endotracheal tube was removed, the patient experienced a rapid decline in symmetrical limb strength, leading to a diagnosis of GBS based on clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and electromyography. Following a 5-day course of immunoglobulin therapy and nutritional nerve treatment, the patient's condition ameliorated, culminating in an uncomplicated discharge.

Conclusion

This case provides evidence supporting the potential use of omadacycline as a therapeutic option for the treatment of severe C. psittaci pneumonia. The utilization of mNGS technology is of paramount importance in the prompt identification of uncommon pathogens, including C. psittaci. Nevertheless, the occurrence of GBS should be taken into consideration when C. psittaci pneumonia is accompanied by symmetrical limb weakness. These findings have important implications for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with C. psittaci pneumonia.

Omadacycline for the treatment of severe pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

Chlamydia psittaci infection in humans is a rare cause that mainly present as community-acquired pneumonia. Severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction with a mortality rate of 15%-20% before accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has an advantage in achieving early diagnosis. In the study, omadacycline implementation was described to provide a better understanding of effectiveness in severe psittacosis pneumonia with ARDS.

Methods

Sixteen patients with severe psittacosis pneumonia with ARDS were selected between September 2021 and October 2022. They were diagnosed using mNGS and treated with omadacycline. Retrospective analysis of clinical manifestations, laboratory data, disease progression, diagnostic tool, treatment, and prognosis was summarized.

Results

Common symptoms included fever, dyspnea, and cough. All patients developed ARDS, accompanied by septic shock (43.7%) and pulmonary embolism (43.7%). Laboratory data showed normal leucocytes, increased creatine kinase isoenzyme, and decreased albumin with liver dysfunction in most patients. All patients had increased neutrophils, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and D-dimer with decreased lymphocytes. Airspace consolidation, ground glass opacity, and pleural effusion were found on chest CT. mNGS results were obtained in 24-48 h to identify the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittacosis. All patients received mechanical ventilation with omadacycline treatment. Fourteen patients experienced complete recovery, while the other two patients died from multidrug-resistant bacterial infection and renal failure.

Conclusion

mNGS has a significant value in the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci infection. Timely treatment of omadacycline can improve prognosis and provide a promising new option for the treatment of severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia with ARDS.

Prostatic abscess due to carbapenem-resistant K. pneumonia: A case report

RATIONALE

Due to the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the morbidity of prostate abscesses (PA) has declined dramatically. However, under special circumstances, such as invasive procedures and immunosuppressive conditions, some patients are more likely to develop this disease. Here, we present the case of a 21-year-old man, diagnosed with PA, with a history of chronic steroid use and a long-term indwelling urinary catheter. The pathogen was confirmed as carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, a rare bacterium. This case indicates that immunodeficiency and invasive catheter use may be risk factors for PA and opportunistic bacterial infections.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 21-year-old young man presented with sudden onset of high fever (39.7°C). The patient had a history of long-term use of steroids and long-term indwelling urinary catheter. Digital rectal examination revealed obvious swelling and tenderness of the prostate. Subsequent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a high signal lesion measuring 2.1 × 2.9 × 2.8 cm with T1 enhancement and T2 enhancement.

DIAGNOSES

On the 8th day of hospitalization, the patient underwent a PA drainage procedure and a pus culture was conducted. Subsequent pus and urine cultures showed the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae, which exhibited resistance to all injectable carbapenems, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, piperacillin-tazobactam, and quinolone drugs.

INTERVENTIONS

On the 8th day of hospitalization, the patient underwent PA drainage surgery under general anesthesia to drain the abscess and relieve obstruction. After the surgery, the patient received a 2-week treatment of doxycycline.

OUTCOMES

Finally, the patient was discharged after recovery and did not experience recurrence during the 6-month follow-up period.

LESSONS

PA is not commonly found, but some patients are more susceptible to this disease under certain host conditions. Immunodeficiency and invasive catheter use may be risk factors for PA and opportunistic bacterial infections. The use of omadacycline for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections appears to be effective.

Omadacycline therapy for Mycobacterium abscessus species infections

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance and therapy-related adverse effects make Mycobacterium abscessus treatment challenging. Omadacycline is a novel, bioavailable aminomethylcycline with favourable in vitro activity against M. abscessus.

AIMS

To describe a case report and review the published literature describing outcomes for M. abscessus infections treated with omadacycline.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

We identified three articles that, in addition to our case report, describe 18 patients. Pulmonary infections were most frequent. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were reported for two isolates (0.25 and 0.5 mg/L). Despite half the patients starting omadacycline because of failure of prior therapy, 15 (83%) had a favourable outcome, defined as 'cure', 'improvement' or 'clinical success' as determined by the primary study authors. One patient (6%) discontinued omadacycline because of gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited observational data and in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging, randomised control trials are required to determine the role of omadacycline as part of combination therapy for this most difficult-to-treat pathogen.

Long-term evaluation of clinical success and safety of omadacycline in nontuberculous mycobacteria infections: a retrospective, multicenter cohort of real-world health outcomes

Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49-67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo (4 - 14), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).

Case Report: Omadacycline in the treatment of macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in an adolescent patient

Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline antibiotic that exhibits good in vitro antibacterial activity against atypical pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae. It is approved for the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. However, the safety and efficacy of omadacycline in pediatric patients under 18 years of age have not yet been established. In the present paper, we report a case of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia in which initial empirical anti-infective therapy had failed. The patient received empirical anti-infective therapy with azithromycin and other antimicrobial agents upon admission but showed a poor clinical response and developed secondary tinnitus and liver dysfunction. After the confirmation of M. pneumoniae infection through metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, an antibiotic switch to omadacycline was made. Thereafter, the patient's condition improved, and no adverse reactions were observed. These findings demonstrate that mNGS enables the identification of infection-causing pathogens in patients with unresponsive pneumonia. Omadacycline can be considered as an alternative option for anti-infective therapy in pediatric M. pneumoniae pneumonia, especially when the presence of bacterial resistance, adverse drug reactions, or organ failure are taken into consideration.

New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.

The pharmacokinetic evaluation of omadacycline (Oral Only Dosing Regimen) for the treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

INTRODUCTION

Omadacycline is a new analog of the tetracycline class active against atypical bacteria, as well as against staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

AREAS COVERED

This review has summarized the available clinical evidence on the use of oral omadacycline in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and described the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters in healthy and special populations and the latest research on omadacycline.

EXPERT OPINION

The available clinical evidence on oral omadacycline for the treatment of CAP shows that its properties provide reliable empirical coverage for pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and species of Legionella, Chlamydia, and Mycoplasma. Omadacycline is also active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae; and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. A dose of 450 mg orally once daily is recommended, followed by a maintenance dose of 300 mg orally once daily. Importantly, omadacycline does not require dose adjustment for patients based on BMI, age, gender, or renal or hepatic impairment.

Steno-sphere: Navigating the enigmatic world of emerging multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first-line agents, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam- avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug-resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in-vitro and sparse in-vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Omadacycline in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in patients with comorbidities: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 OPTIC trial

Introduction

The 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend respiratory fluoroquinolones to treat community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults with comorbidities. Fluoroquinolones are effective against both typical and atypical pathogens. However, fluoroquinolone treatment has a risk of adverse effects, and the Food and Drug Administration has issued black box safety warnings for their use. Inpatient use of fluoroquinolones has reduced as a result; however, most antibiotic courses are completed as outpatients and discharge prescriptions account for the majority of fluoroquinolone use. As such, a new treatment option is needed to replace fluoroquinolones. Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity and is available as a once-daily intravenous or bioequivalent oral formulation.

Methods

This study assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of omadacycline compared with moxifloxacin for the treatment of adult CABP patients with Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) risk class II/III and ≥1 comorbidity through a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 OPTIC study (NCT02531438).

Results

In total, 239 omadacycline- and 222 moxifloxacin-treated patients were assessed. The median age was similar between groups (omadacycline: 57 years; moxifloxacin: 58 years), with 26.0% and 26.6%, respectively, ≥65 years of age. Early clinical response was 91.6% for patients with ≥1 comorbidity treated with omadacycline and 91.4% for those treated with moxifloxacin. Post-treatment evaluation results for overall response were 89.1% in the omadacycline group and 87.4% in the moxifloxacin group.

Conclusion

Safety warnings have reduced inpatient use of fluoroquinolones; however, outpatient and discharge prescriptions account for the majority of fluoroquinolone use. Outpatients with comorbidities need an efficacious alternative to fluoroquinolones. Omadacycline maintains the similar efficacy and benefits of fluoroquinolones as a once-daily, monotherapy, bioequivalent oral option with potent in vitro activity against the most common CABP pathogens, including S. pneumoniae and atypical pathogens, but offers a materially different safety profile consistent with its tetracycline heritage. In conclusion, both omadacycline and moxifloxacin exhibited similar efficacy in patients with PSI risk class II/III and comorbidities. Omadacycline fulfills an unmet need as an oral monotherapy treatment option for adult patients with CABP, which will further reduce the use of fluoroquinolones.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02531438, identifer: NCT02531438; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2013-004071-13, identifier: EudraCT #2013-004071-13.

Omadacycline, Eravacycline, and Tigecycline Express Anti-Mycobacterium abscessus Activity In Vitro

Mycobacterium abscessus infections are increasing worldwide necessitating the development of new antibiotics and treatment regimens. The utility of third-generation tetracycline antibiotics was reestablished; their anti-M. abscessus activity needs further study. The activities of omadacycline (OMC), eravacycline (ERC), tigecycline (TGC), and sarecycline (SAC) were tested against two reference strains and 193 clinical M. abscessus isolates at different temperatures (30°C and 37°C). The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of the four drugs were determined to distinguish between their bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities. The MICs of OMC, ERC, and TGC for the reference strains and clinical isolates were summarized and compared. OMC, ERC, and TGC exhibited a high level of bacteriostatic activity against M. abscessus. The MICs of OMC and ERC for M. abscess remained stable, while the MICs of TGC for the isolates/strains increased with increasing temperature. Notably, the MICs of OMC for M. abscessus isolates obtained in the United States are lower than for those obtained in China. IMPORTANCE The antimicrobial activities of four third-generation tetracycline-class drugs, omadacycline (OMC), eravacycline (ERC), tigecycline (TGC), and sarecycline (SAC), were determined for 193 M. abscessus isolates. The activities of the four drugs at two different temperatures (30°C and 37°C) were also tested. OMC, ERC, and TGC exhibited significant activity against M. abscessus. The anti-M. abscessus activity of TGC increased when the temperature was increased from 30°C to 37°C; the activities of OMC and ERC, on the other hand, remained the same. We found that in vitro MICs of OMC against Chinese and American isolates were distinct. Evaluations in in vivo models of M. abscessus disease or in the clinical setting will provide more accurate insight into potency of OMC against distinct isolates.

In Vitro Synergistic Effects of Omadacycline with Other Antimicrobial Agents against Mycobacterium abscessus

The clinical importance of Mycobacterium abscessus species (MABS) infections has been increasing. However, the standard treatment regimens recommended in the current guidelines often result in unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro activity of omadacycline (OMC), a novel tetracycline, against MABS to explore its potential as a novel therapeutic option. The drug susceptibilities of 40 Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus (Mab) clinical strains obtained from the sputum of 40 patients from January 2005 to May 2014 were investigated. The MIC results for OMC, amikacin (AMK), clarithromycin (CLR), clofazimine (CLO), imipenem (IPM), rifabutin (RFB), and tedizolid (TZD) alone and their combined effects (with OMC) were examined using the checkerboard method. Additionally, we studied the differences in the effectiveness of the antibiotic combinations based on the colony morphotype of Mab. The MIC50 and MIC90 of OMC alone were 2 and 4 μg/mL, respectively. The combinations of OMC with AMK, CLR, CLO, IPM, RFB, and TZD showed synergy against 17.5%, 75.8%, 25.0%, 21.1%, 76.9%, and 34.4% of the strains, respectively. Additionally, OMC combined with CLO (47.1% versus 9.5%, P = 0.023) or TZD (60.0% versus 12.5%, P = 0.009) showed significantly higher synergy against strains with rough morphotypes than those with smooth morphotypes. In conclusion, the checkerboard analyses revealed that the synergistic effects of OMC were observed most frequently with RFB, followed by CLR, TZD, CLO, IPM, and AMK. Furthermore, OMC tended to be more effective against rough-morphotype Mab strains.

Evaluation of Omadacycline Alone and in Combination with Rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Biofilm Model

Biofilm-associated infections lead to substantial morbidity. Omadacycline (OMC) is a novel aminomethylcycline with potent in vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, but data surrounding its use in biofilm-associated infections are lacking. We investigated the activity of OMC alone and in combination with rifampin (RIF) against 20 clinical strains of staphylococci in multiple in vitro biofilm analyses, including an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) model (simulating human exposures). The observed MICs for OMC demonstrated potent activity against the evaluated strains (0.125 to 1 mg/L), with an increase of MICs generally observed in the presence of biofilm (0.25 to >64 mg/L). Furthermore, RIF was shown to reduce OMC biofilm MICs (bMICs) in 90% of strains, and OMC plus RIF combination in biofilm time-kill analyses (TKAs) exhibited synergistic activity in most of the strains. Within the PK/PD CBR model, OMC monotherapy primarily displayed bacteriostatic activity, while RIF monotherapy generally exhibited initial bacterial eradication, followed by rapid regrowth likely due to the emergence of RIF resistance (RIF bMIC, >64 mg/L). However, the combination of OMC plus RIF produced rapid and sustained bactericidal activity in nearly all the strains (3.76 to 4.03 log10 CFU/cm2 reductions from starting inoculum in strains in which bactericidal activity was reached). Furthermore, OMC was shown to prevent the emergence of RIF resistance. Our data provide preliminary evidence that OMC in combination with RIF could be a viable option for biofilm-associated infections with S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Further research involving OMC in biofilm-associated infections is warranted.

In Vitro Activity of Omadacycline and Comparator Antibiotics against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Isolates

Limited oral antibiotic options exist for urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. The aim of the study was to evaluate in vitro activity of omadacycline and comparator antibiotics against clinical ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae urinary isolates. 102 isolates each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were collected from clinical urine specimens in 2019. By design, an equal number of each species were included that tested positive and negative for ESBL production. Omadacycline MICs were determined using gradient test strips and compared to MICs of comparator antibiotics as determined by an automated broth microdilution system. Isolates were considered susceptible to omadacycline if the MIC was ≤4 µg/mL for each species. 54.9% of all ESBL-producing isolates were susceptible to omadacycline, but better susceptibility was observed for ESBL-producing E. coli (74.5%). Omadacycline MICs were 2-4 fold lower for E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains not producing ESBL. The omadacycline MIC 50 and 90 values were 4 and 16 µg/mL, respectively, for all isolates studied. 74.5% of all isolates were considered susceptible to omadacycline. MICs were generally lower for E. coli strains with MIC 50 and 90 values of 4 and 8 µg/mL, respectively (87.3% susceptible), compared with K. pneumoniae. Overall, the most active agents were omadacycline and nitrofurantoin, while other comparator antibiotics were less active. Omadacycline represents a promising oral antibiotic for treating UTI caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, particularly when resistance limits other oral options. Prospective, controlled clinical trials are needed to validate these in vitro results.

In vitro susceptibility testing of tetracycline-class antibiotics against slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria

Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections are gradually increasing worldwide, with slow-growing mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium kansasii accounting for the majority of cases. The use of tetracyclines has received renewed attention in recent years, and this study was designed to investigate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline, eravacycline, tigecycline, sarecycline, minocycline and doxycycline against M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. kansasii. Susceptibility testing of six tetracyclines was conducted against M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. kansasii isolates, and all the clinical isolates were collected from January 2012 to December 2018. All six agents exhibited poor antibacterial activity against slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM) isolates of three subspecies with MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀  ≥8 μg/mL. M. intracellulare and M. kansasii had lower resistance rates to omadacycline than the other five drugs. The severe resistance of SGM to tetracycline suggests that developing tetracycline-class antibiotics needs to overcome existing resistance mechanisms.

Efficacy of Omadacycline-Containing Regimen in a Mouse Model of Pulmonary Mycobacteroides abscessus Disease

Mycobacteroides abscessus is an opportunistic pathogen in people with structural lung conditions such as bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. Pulmonary M. abscessus infection causes progressive symptomatic and functional decline as well as diminished lung function and is often incurable with existing antibiotics. We investigated the efficacy of a new tetracycline, omadacycline, in combination with existing antibiotics recommended to treat this indication, in a mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease. Amikacin, azithromycin, bedaquiline, biapenem, cefoxitin, clofazimine, imipenem, linezolid, and rifabutin were selected as companions to omadacycline. M. abscessus burden in the lungs of mice over a 4-week treatment duration was considered the endpoint. Omadacycline in combination with linezolid, imipenem, cefoxitin, biapenem, or rifabutin exhibited early bactericidal activity compared to any single drug. Using three M. abscessus isolates, we also determined the in vitro frequency of spontaneous resistance against omadacycline to be between 1.9 × 10-10 and 6.2 × 10-10 and the frequency of persistence against omadacycline to be between 5.3 × 10-6 and 1.3 × 10-5. Based on these findings, the combination of omadacycline and select drugs that are included in the recent treatment guidelines may exhibit improved potency to treat M. abscessus lung disease. IMPORTANCE M. abscessus disease incidence is increasing in the United States. This disease is difficult to cure with existing antibiotics. In this study, we describe the efficacy of a new tetracycline antibiotic, omadacycline, in combination with an existing antibiotic to treat this disease. A mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease was used to assess the efficacies of these experimental treatment regimens. Omadacycline in combination with select existing antibiotics exhibited bactericidal activity during the early phase of treatment.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae

Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with in vitro activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment on days 1 and 2 by MIC were assessed using the following four approaches for selecting PK-PD targets: (i) median, (ii) second highest, (iii) highest, and (iv) randomly assigned total-drug ELF and free-drug plasma ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with a 1-log₁₀ CFU reduction from baseline. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on total-drug ELF AUC/MIC ratio targets on days 1 and 2 were ≥91.1% for S. pneumoniae for all approaches but the highest target and ≥99.2% for H. influenzae for all approaches at MIC₉₀s (0.12 and 1 μg/mL for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively). Lower percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on free-drug plasma AUC/MIC ratio targets were observed for randomly assigned and the highest free-drug plasma targets for S. pneumoniae and for all targets for H. influenzae. These data provided support for approved omadacycline dosing regimens to treat patients with CABP and decisions for the interpretive criteria for the in vitro susceptibility testing of omadacycline against these pathogens.

Evaluation of the Impact of Comorbidities on Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics

Omadacycline is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Analyses were undertaken to evaluate pharmacokinetic differences among subjects or patients stratified by comorbidities. Differences in clearance by smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, hypertension, heart failure, or coronary artery disease were evaluated using a Welch two-sample t test. Smoking was the only significant comorbidity after correction for sex, with a clinically insignificant difference of 13%. Omadacycline dose adjustments based on these comorbidities do not appear to be warranted.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Tigecycline, Eravacycline, Omadacycline, and Sarecycline against Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria

Infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) have increased globally. Chemotherapy against these infections is challenging due to the minimal antimicrobial choices available. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibilities of four tetracyclines against different RGM species. The MICs of eravacycline (ERC), omadacycline (OMC), sarecycline (SAC), and tigecycline (TGC) against the reference strains of 27 RGM species and 121 RGM clinical isolates were determined by microtiter plate assay. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) and cytotoxicities of these antibiotics were also tested. Except for SAC, the other three tetracyclines had MICs of ≤0.5 μg/mL against all 27 RGM reference strains. ERC generally presented the lowest MICs, with MIC₉₀s against the clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense, and Mycobacterium fortuitum of 0.25 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively. TGC and OMC also showed equivalent in vitro inhibitory activities against the isolates, while the TGC MIC₉₀s for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum were lower than or equal to the OMC MIC₉₀s (1, 1, and 0.25 μg/mL versus 1, 2, and 2 μg/mL). In addition, the MIC₅₀s of three of the antibiotics for each species were always 2-fold lower than the corresponding MIC₉₀s. MBC and cytotoxicity assays indicated that all four tetracycline antibiotics tested were bacteriostatic agents with low toxicity to the THP-1 cell line. Tetracycline antibiotics are efficacious in RGM infection treatment, with omadacycline showing the best promise for clinical application due to its potent antimicrobial activity, safety, and convenient administration route. IMPORTANCE The global rise in antibiotic-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria has prompted the urgent need for new antimicrobials, especially oral antibiotics. Currently, adverse effects have limited the use of tetracycline-class antibiotics, particularly tigecycline (TGC), in the treatment of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). However, several new tetracycline-class antibiotics might overcome the limitations of TGC. We assessed the in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities of four tetracyclines (eravacycline, omadacycline, sarecycline, and tigecycline) against reference RGM strains and clinical isolates of different RGM species. We showed that three of these antibiotics (tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline) might be efficacious in M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum treatment. Furthermore, omadacycline was more promising for clinical application for M. abscessus infections as an oral drug, whereas sarecycline, which had the best safety parameters, should be considered a potential antibiotic for M. abscessus infections caused by susceptible strains. Our work underscores the possible clinical applications of tetracycline-class antibiotics in the treatment of RGM infections.

Use of Omadacycline as a Component of Mycobacterium Abscessus Eradication in an Adolescent With Cystic Fibrosis

Lung damage caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections can be devastating to individuals that are predisposed to chronic respiratory colonization. Cystic fibrosis patients are at increased risk for diminished lung function and increased mortality from NTM pulmonary infections. Treatment regimens are often intense and prolonged. The case described in this report is of a 16-year-old male with cystic fibrosis infected with Mycobacterium abscessus who showed evidence of severe nodular pulmonary disease on chest computerized tomography. His intensive treatment phase was complicated by neutropenia and drug resistance, leading to the use of omadacycline. Because of rapid improvement clinically and on computed tomography, he was successfully treated with a modified, less intense continuation phase that included azithromycin, omadacycline, and inhaled amikacin. The patient also was switched from tezacaftor/ivacaftor to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor during the course of NTM treatment.

Omadacycline Is Highly Active In Vitro against Mycoplasma genitalium

Here, we performed in vitro susceptibility testing on 10 Mycoplasma genitalium isolates against omadacycline, minocycline, tetracycline, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and azithromycin. Omadacycline was the most potent agent, with all MICs of ≤0.5 μg/mL. MICs were not affected by resistance to other agents, including resistance to other tetracycline class drugs. Omadacycline may be a potential treatment option for M. genitalium infection. IMPORTANCE There are very few clinical isolates of Mycoplasma genitalium available for in vitro susceptibility testing. We studied 10 isolates and determined that the new semisynthetic aminomethylcycline omadacycline is active against isolates that are resistant to tetracyclines, macrolides, and quinolones. These data suggest that clinical studies should be performed in order to see if omadacycline may be useful to treat urogenital infections caused by M. genitalium.

Re-establishing the utility of tetracycline-class antibiotics for current challenges with antibiotic resistance

The progressive increase in antibiotic resistance in recent decades calls for urgent development of new antibiotics and antibiotic stewardship programs to help select appropriate treatments with the goal of minimising further emergence of resistance and to optimise clinical outcomes. Three new tetracycline-class antibiotics, eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline, have been approved within the past 15 years, and represent a new era in the use of tetracyclines. These drugs overcome the two main mechanisms of acquired tetracycline-class resistance and exhibit a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobic, and atypical pathogens, including many drug-resistant strains. We provide an overview of the three generations of tetracycline-class drugs, focussing on the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of these three new third-generation tetracycline-class drugs. We also consider various scenarios of unmet clinical needs where patients might benefit from re-engagement with tetracycline-class antibiotics including outpatient treatment options, patients with known β-lactam antibiotic allergy, reducing the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection, and their potential as monotherapy in polymicrobial infections while minimising the risk of any potential drug-drug interaction. KEY MESSAGESThe long-standing safety profile and broad spectrum of activity of tetracycline-class antibiotics made them a popular choice for treatment of various bacterial infections; unfortunately, antimicrobial resistance has limited the utility of the early-generation tetracycline agents.The latest generation of tetracycline-class antibiotics, including eravacycline, tigecycline, and omadacycline, overcomes the most common acquired tetracycline resistance mechanisms.Based on in vitro characteristics and clinical data, these newer tetracycline agents provide an effective antibiotic option in the treatment of approved indications in patients with unmet clinical needs - including patients with severe penicillin allergy, with renal or hepatic insufficiency, recent Clostridioides difficile infection, or polymicrobial infections, and those at risk of drug-drug interactions.

In vitro antimicrobial activity and resistance mechanisms of the new generation tetracycline agents, eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates

In this study, we investigated the in vitro activity and resistance mechanisms of the new generation tetracycline agents, namely eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline, against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. A total of 1,017 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected and subjected to susceptibility testing against eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline using the broth microdilution method. Tetracyclines-resistant (eravacycline/omadacycline/tigecycline-resistant) isolates were selected to elucidate the resistance mechanisms using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cloning experiment, efflux pump inhibition, and quantitative real-time PCR. The results of the antibacterial susceptibility testing showed that compared with omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline had superior antibacterial activity against S. aureus isolates. Among 1,017 S. aureus, 41 tetracyclines-resistant isolates were identified. These resistant isolates possessed at least one tetracycline resistance gene and genetic mutation in the MepRAB efflux pump and 30S ribosome units. A frameshift mutation in mepB was detected in most tetracyclines-resistant strains (except for JP3349) compared with tetracyclines-susceptible (eravacycline/omadacycline/tigecycline-susceptible) strains. This was first shown to decrease susceptibility to omadacycline, but not to eravacycline and tigecycline. After treatment with eravacycline, omadacycline or tigecycline, overexpression of mepA, tet38, tet(K) and tet(L) was detected. Moreover, multi-locus sequence typing showed a major clonal dissemination type, ST5, and its variant ST764 were seen in most tetracyclines-resistant strains. To conclude, eravacycline and tigecycline exhibited better activity against S. aureus including tetracycline-resistant isolates than omadacycline. The resistance to these new generation tetracyclines due to an accumulation of many resistance mechanisms.

Omadacycline for the Treatment of Severe Chlamydia psittaci Pneumonia Complicated with Multiple Organ Failure: A Case Report

Psittacosis is a rare zoonotic disease caused by Chlamydia psittaci infection, and tetracyclines are the preferred treatment. Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline that has a strong in vitro antibacterial activity against atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci; however, clinical data for its usage are lacking. We report a patient with severe C. psittaci-induced pneumonia presenting with a high fever, muscle aches, severe hepatic and renal insufficiency, and acute respiratory failure requiring tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The condition was diagnosed using metagenomic next-generation sequencing. The patient was discharged after treatment with omadacycline. The findings of this study suggest that metagenomic next-generation sequencing is valuable for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of psittacosis. With its good safety profile and no requirement for dose adjustment in special populations, omadacycline is a new option for the treatment of severe C. psittaci pneumonia. However, additional case reports are needed to support this conclusion.

Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in the Hollow Fiber System Model and Potential Combination Regimen for Short Course Treatment of Mycobacterium kansasii Pulmonary Disease

The 12-month therapy duration for the treatment of Mycobacterium kansasii pulmonary disease calls for more efficacious drugs for better treatment outcomes and to shorten the therapy duration. We performed (i) omadacycline MIC with M. kansasii ATCC 12478 strain and 21 clinical isolates, (ii) dose-response study in the hollow fiber system model of M. kansasii (HFS-Mkn) with six human equivalent omadacycline daily doses to determine the optimal drug exposure for the maximal kill, and (iii) a second HFS-Mkn study to determine the efficacy of omadacycline (300 mg/day) plus moxifloxacin (600 mg/day) plus tedizolid (200 mg/day) combination regimen with standard regimen as comparator. GraphPad Prism was used for data analysis and graphing. MIC of the reference strain was 4 mg/L but ranged from 8 to 32 mg/L among the 21 clinical isolates. In the HFS-Mkn, the exposure required for 50% of the maximal effect (EC₅₀) was an omadacycline area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC_0-24/MIC) ratio of 1.95. The optimal exposure was an AUC_0-24/MIC of 3.05, which could be achieved with 300 mg/day clinical dose. The omadacycline-moxifloxacin-tedizolid combination sterilized the HFS-Mkn in 14 days with a linear-regression based kill rate of -0.309 ± 0.044 log₁₀ CFU/mL/day compared to the kill rate of -0.084 ± 0.036log₁₀ CFU/mL/day with the standard regimen or 3.7-times faster. Omadacycline has efficacy against M. kansasii and could be used at 300 mg/day in combination with moxifloxacin and tedizolid for the treatment of M. kansasii pulmonary diseases with the potential to shorten the currently recommended 12-month therapy duration.

Efficacy and safety of optional parenteral antimicrobial therapy for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) carry significant economic burden, as well as morbidity and mortality, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of optional antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline (Via Ovid SP), Embase (Via Ovid SP), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception to March 22, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied the use of optional antimicrobial therapy for cSSTIs. Citations' screening, study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. The primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 48 trials covering 24,381 patients assessing 20 types of antimicrobial treatment modalities were included. Overall, omadacycline was associated with the highest beneficial effect on clinical and microbiological treatment success and with the largest rank probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, avarofloxacin was closely followed. Both had, however, omadacycline was related to moderately safety profiles. Lefamulin ranked as the best option was associated with the lowest risk of severe AEs. Subgroup analysis showed similar results. The quality of primary outcomes was moderate to low.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of omadacycline was associated with higher rates of clinical and microbiological treatment success for the treatment of cSSTIs, with a relative low risk of AEs. Due to the limitations of the included RCTs, high-quality and well-designed RCTs are needed to further confirm the results.

In-vitro activity of plazomicin, meropenem-vaborbactam, and omadacycline against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates in Egypt

Anti-microbial resistance is an escalating worldwide threat. Thus, there is an utmost necessity for the introduction of novel anti-microbial agents. This research aimed to evaluate the in-vitro activity of plazomicin, meropenem-vaborbactam, and omadacycline against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates gathered from one Egyptian University group of Hospitals. 210 intensive care units (ICU) and 113 non-ICU samples were included. Resistance to carbapenems was reported in 37.5% and 21.05% of the isolated Gram-negative ICU and non-ICU organisms respectively (P < 0.001). Via disc diffusion, the sensitivity rates for carbapenem-resistant non-ICU and ICU strains were 68.8% & 64.4% for plazomicin, 68.8% & 48.9% for meropenem-vaborbactam, and 56.25% & 44.5% for omadacycline, respectively. Regarding MIC₅₀/_90, it was 1/16 μg/mL for plazomicin and 4/32 μg/mL for both meropenem-vaborbactam and omadacycline separately. In conclusion, plazomicin displayed potent activity against carbapenem-resistant strains. Moreover, meropenem-vaborbactam and omadacycline demonstrated satisfactory results.

Activity of Omadacycline Alone and in Combination against Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii with Varying Minocycline Susceptibility

Tetracycline-based combinations are increasingly used for serious carbapenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii (CNSAb) infections given their potent in vitro activity, synergism with other agents, and acceptable toxicity profile. Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline with activity against minocycline-resistant pathogens, once daily oral dosing, and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Given these potential advantages, the in vitro potency and antibacterial activity of omadacycline were evaluated alone and in combination against CNSAb with varying minocycline susceptibility. Broth microdilution testing of 41 CNSAb revealed that omadacycline (MIC50/90: 4/8 mg/L) inhibited 68.3% (28/41) of isolates at ≤4 mg/L and its activity was unaffected by minocycline nonsusceptibility (MIC50/90: 4/8 mg/L; 74.2% [23/31] inhibited at ≤4 mg/L). Ten (5 minocycline susceptible and 5 nonsusceptible) of the 41 CNSAb isolates were then evaluated in time-kill analyses against omadacycline and comparator agents alone and in dual- and triple-drug combinations at the free maximum concentration of drug in serum (fCmax). Amikacin, meropenem, and polymyxin B alone were each bactericidal against 4 of 10 (40%) isolates while omadacycline and sulbactam were bactericidal against 0 (0%) and 1 (10%), respectively. In dual-drug combinations with omadacycline, synergy was observed against 80% of isolates with sulbactam followed by 30% with amikacin or polymyxin B and 0% with meropenem or rifampin. The triple-drug combination of omadacycline, sulbactam, and polymyxin B achieved synergy against just one additional strain over the omadacycline-sulbactam dual combination but significantly reduced the time to 99.9% kill by more than 6 h (4.6 ± 2.8 h vs. 11.3 ± 5.9 h, P < 0.01). These results support the continued investigation into tetracycline-based combinations against CNSAb, particularly those including sulbactam, and suggest that omadacycline may have in vitro advantages over existing tetracycline-derivatives. IMPORTANCE Treatment of infections due to Acinetobacter baumannii often involves the use of multiple antibiotics simultaneously as combination therapy, but it is unknown which antibiotics are best used together. Tetracycline agents such as minocycline and tigecycline maintain good activity against A. baumannii and are often used with one or more other agents to achieve better killing of the bacteria. Omadacycline is a new tetracycline that may have a role in the treatment of A. baumannii, but no data are available evaluating its interaction with other commonly used drugs such as polymyxin B and sulbactam. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline when combined with one or more other agents against carbapenem-resistant strains of A. baumannii. These findings may then be used to design confirmatory studies that could help decide what drugs work best together and what combination of agents should be used for patients.

In Vitro Activity of KBP-7072 against 536 Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Isolates Collected in China

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged globally as a difficult-to-treat nosocomial pathogen and become resistant to carbapenems, resulting in limited treatment options. KBP-7072 is a novel semisynthetic aminomethylcycline, expanded spectrum tetracycline antibacterial agent with completed phase 1 clinical development studies. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of KBP-7072 and several comparators against clinical A. baumannii isolates collected from China. A collection of 536 A. baumannii clinical isolates were isolated from 20 hospitals across 13 provinces and cities in China between 2018 and 2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 12 antimicrobial agents was performed utilizing the broth microdilution method recommended by CLSI. KBP-7072 has shown active antibacterial activity against 536 A. baumannii isolates. It inhibited the growth of all isolates at 4 mg/liter, including 372 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 37 tigecycline MIC ≥ 4 mg/liter isolates, and 138 omadacycline MIC ≥ 4 mg/liter isolates. Compared with other expanded spectrum tetracyclines, KBP-7072 (MIC₉₀, 1 mg/liter) outperformed 2-fold and 4-fold more active against 536 A. baumannii isolates than tigecycline (MIC₉₀, 2 mg/liter) and omadacycline (MIC₉₀, 4 mg/liter). KBP-7072 was as equally active as colistin (MIC₉₀, 1 mg/liter, 99.4% susceptible). Doxycycline (33.4% susceptible), gentamicin (31.3% susceptible), meropenem (30.6%, susceptible), imipenem (30.2% susceptible), ceftazidime (27.8% susceptible), piperacillin-tazobactam (27.2% susceptible), and levofloxacin (27.2% susceptible) showed marginally poor antibacterial activity against tested isolates according to CLSI breakpoints, except for minocycline (73.7% susceptible). KBP-7072 is a potential alternative agent for the treatment of infection caused by A. baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant species.

IMPORTANCE It is reported that A. baumannii has emerged as an intractable nosocomial pathogen in hospitals especially when it develops resistance to carbapenems and other antibiotics, which limits treatment options and leads to high mortality. In February 2017, the WHO published a list of ESKAPE pathogens designated “priority status” for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Therefore, the epidemiological surveillance and new therapeutic development of A. baumannii must be strengthened to confront an emerging global epidemic. KBP-7072 is a novel, expanded spectrum tetracycline antibacterial and has demonstrated good in vitro activity against recent geographically diverse A. baumannii isolates collected from North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific. This study has shown excellent in vitro activity of KBP-7072 against clinical A. baumannii isolates collected from different regions of China, regarded as supplementary to KBP-7072 pharmacodynamics data, which is of great significance, as it is promising an alternative treatment in CRAB isolates infections in China.

Multicenter surveillance of in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline, and comparator antibiotics against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex causing bloodstream infection in Taiwan, 2020

OBJECTIVES

: To determine the in vitro activities of novel and comparator antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan.

METHODS

: Isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 335), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 316; 144 isolates with hyperviscosity characteristics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 271), Acinetobacter baumannii complex species (n = 187), and non-typhoidal Salmonella species (n = 226), Shigella species (n = 13) from miscellaneous culture sources were collected in 2020 in Taiwan. The MICs of the isolates to test antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. GeneXpert was used to detect genes encoding carbapenemases among the carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Enterobacterales isolates.

RESULTS

: The MIC values of the cefepime-enmetazobactam combination against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (MIC₉₀ ≤ 0.5 mg/L), bla_KPC-harboring E. coli isolates (0.25 mg/L; n = 2), and 80% of bla_OXA-48-like gene-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates (≤2 mg/L) were low. The MIC ranges of the cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates (irrespective of the carbapenemase type [MIC₉₀ ≤ 4 mg/L]) and carbapenem-NS or ceftolozane-tazobactam-NS P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC₉₀ value, 8 mg/L) were significantly lower than those of the cefepime-enmetazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

: The efficacy of novel antibiotics against important drug-resistant GNB must be monitored and validated during the clinical treatment of patients.

Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

An integrated approach to evaluate different tetracycline derivatives for formulary decisions

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as a critical opportunistic pathogen associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Tetracycline derivatives have been recognized as alternative treatment options, but they have varied pharmacokinetic properties. An integrated approach to different tetracycline derivatives for formulary decisions is reported.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from clonally diverse bloodstream S. maltophilia isolates were examined, along with the pharmacokinetic profiles of 4 tetracycline derivatives, to predict achievable pharmacodynamic exposures with standard intravenous dosing regimens. Antimicrobial therapy was assessed using the ratio of daily drug acquisition cost relative to the ratio of the free-drug area under the time-concentration curve (fAUC) to the 90th percentile for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for isolates (fAUC/MIC90).

RESULTS

In our analysis, minocycline had the greatest fAUC/MIC90. Doxycycline was the most financially preferred agent, as calculated using 2020 average wholesale price for base-case estimates of drug acquisition cost.

CONCLUSION

An integrated evaluation for antimicrobial formulary decision-making addressed local susceptibility data, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing regimens, and drug acquisition costs. This comprehensive method is more objective than the conventional approach and warrants validation.

In Vitro Activity of Omadacycline and Five Comparators against Contemporary Ribotypes of Clostridioides difficile in Stockholm, Sweden

Clostridioides difficile infection represents a growing clinical challenge. The new compound omadacycline is a potential treatment alternative, as many antibiotics have limited activity or are rarely used due to costs and side effects. The activity of omadacycline and five comparators was assessed with agar dilution on a 2015-to-2018 collection of 65 C. difficile isolates from Sweden. Omadacycline demonstrated in vitro activity against the contemporary ribotypes of C. difficile, and further clinical investigation is needed.

IMPORTANCE Evaluating the activity of novel antimicrobials like omadacycline is of great interest, as a reliable and efficient antimicrobial treatment for Clostridioides difficile infections is in demand.

Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey Among Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections who Received Either Omadacycline or Linezolid in a Phase 3 Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trial

This analysis of data from a Phase 3 study of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections showed that successful oral treatment with omadacycline (n = 368) or linezolid (n = 367) was associated with improvement in health-related quality of life.

Potential Cost Savings Associated with Targeted Substitution of Current Guideline-Concordant Inpatient Agents with Omadacycline for the Treatment of Adult Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at High Risk for Clostridioides difficile Infections: Results of Healthcare-Decision Analytic Model from the United States Hospital Perspective

Introduction: Approximately 3% of hospitalized patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) develop healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HCA-CDI). The validated Davis risk score (DRS) indicates that patients with a DRS ≥ 6 are at an increased risk of 30-day HCA-CDI. In the phase 3 OPTIC CABP study, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 who received moxifloxacin developed CDI vs. 0% for omadacycline. This study assessed the potential economic impact of substituting current guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments with omadacycline in hospitalized CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals. Methods: A deterministic healthcare-decision analytic model was developed. The model population was hospitalized adult CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals (100,000 patients). In the guideline-concordant arm, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 were assumed to develop an HCA-CDI, each costing USD 20,100. In the omadacycline arm, 5 days of therapy was calculated for the entire model population. Results: The use of omadacycline in place of guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments for CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 was estimated to result in cost savings of USD 55.4 million annually across US hospitals. Conclusion: The findings of this simulated model suggest that prioritizing the use of omadacycline over current CABP treatments in hospitalized CABP with a DRS ≥ 6 may potentially reduce attributable HCA-CDI costs. The findings are not unique to omadacycline and could be applied to any antibiotic that confers a lower risk of HCA-CDI relative to current CABP inpatient treatments.

Use of oral tetracyclines in the treatment of adult outpatients with skin and skin structure infections: Focus on doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline

Oral tetracyclines have been used in clinical practice for over 60 years. One of the most common indications for use of oral tetracyclines is for treatment of adult outpatients with skin and soft infections (SSTIs), including acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The 2014 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) skin and soft tissue guideline strongly recommends sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, clindamycin, and tetracyclines as oral treatment options for patients with purulent SSTIs, especially when methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus is of clinical concern. Despite the long‐standing use of tetracyclines, practice patterns indicate that they are often considered after other guideline‐concordant oral options for the treatment of patients with SSTIs. Clinicians may therefore be less familiar with the clinical data associated with use of commercially available tetracycline agents for treatment of patients with SSTI. This review summarizes the literature on the use of oral tetracyclines (ie, doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline) for the treatment of adult patients with SSTIs. As part of this review, we describe their common mechanisms of resistance, susceptibility profiles against common SSTI pathogens, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and comparative clinical data.

Efficacy of Omadacycline against Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Strains in a Mouse Peritonitis Model

Omadacycline (OMC) showed better in vitro potency than daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) against Van^r, Amp^r, DAP-nonsusceptible, linezolid-resistant, cfr(B)⁺ Enterococcus faecium strains. In a mouse peritonitis model, OMC also showed significantly better animal survival during the study and at its end than DAP or VAN with these E. faecium strains. However, OMC, DAP, and VAN showed comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacies against a non-vancomycin-resistant, tetracycline-resistant, DAP-susceptible E. faecium strain.

Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study

Background

Severity/mortality risk scores and disease characteristics may assist in deciding whether patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) require outpatient treatment or hospitalization. The phase 3 OPTIC (Omadacycline for Pneumonia Treatment In the Community) study enrolled patients with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class II–IV. Omadacycline demonstrated noninferiority to moxifloxacin in adults with CABP, at early clinical response (ECR) and posttreatment evaluation (PTE). We assessed efficacy of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in these patients based on disease severity.

Methods

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) omadacycline (100 mg every 12 hours for 2 doses followed by 100 mg daily [q24h], with optional transition to omadacycline 300 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment) or moxifloxacin IV 400 mg q24h (with optional transition to 400 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment). Total treatment duration was 7–14 days. We compared rates of early clinical success (72–120 hours after first dose) and investigator-assessed clinical success at PTE (5–10 days after last dose) in subgroups based (1) on severity/mortality risk scores (PORT, CURB-65, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment, modified ATS, SMART-COP) and (2) on presence of baseline radiographic characteristics, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma, or bacteremia.

Results

Altogether, 774 patients (omadacycline, n = 386; moxifloxacin, n = 388) were randomized. Clinical success rates (ECR/PTE) were similar between treatment groups (across all subgroups). Efficacy across treatment groups was similar in patients with baseline radiographic characteristics or COPD/asthma, but moxifloxacin had higher clinical success rates in patients with bacteremia.

Conclusions

Efficacy of omadacycline was similar to that of moxifloxacin, regardless of disease severity/mortality risk and disease characteristics.

Clinical Efficacy of Patients With Secondary Bacteremia Treated With Omadacycline: Results From Phase 3 Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Studies

In this post hoc analysis of the 63 patients with secondary bacteremia enrolled in the 3 omadacycline phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin/skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), we determined that omadacycline is a viable therapeutic option for appropriate patients with secondary bacteremia.

Efficacy of Omadacycline against Escherichia coli in a Mouse Urinary Tract Infection Model

In a mouse urinary tract infection model, omadacycline (OMC) was comparable to gentamicin and better than ciprofloxacin (CIP) against a tetracycline-susceptible (TET-S), CIP-resistant (CIP-R) Escherichia coli strain. Gentamicin showed better efficacy than OMC against a TET-R, CIP-R E. coli strain, and OMC again showed better efficacy than CIP against this strain. OMC may warrant further study as a potential option for urinary tract infection treatment against CIP-R E. coli strains.

Omadacycline compared to vancomycin when combined with germinants to disrupt the life cycle of Clostridioides difficile

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) infections (CDI) are commonly treated with antibiotics that do not impact the dormant spore form of the pathogen. CDI-directed antibiotics, such as vancomycin and metronidazole, can destroy the vegetative form of C. difficile and protective microbiota. After treatment, spores can germinate into vegetative cells causing clinical disease relapse and further spore shedding. This in vitro study compares the combination of germinants with vancomycin or omadacycline to antibiotics alone in eradicating C. difficile spores and vegetative cells. Among the four strains in this study, omadacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (0.031-0.125 mg/L) were lower than vancomycin (1-4 mg/L). Omadacycline nor vancomycin in media alone reduced spore counts. In three of the four strains, including the epidemic ribotype 027, spore eradication with germinants was 94.8-97.4% with vancomycin and 99.4-99.8% with omadacycline (p<0.005). In ribotype 012, either antibiotic combined with germinants resulted in 100% spore eradication at 24 hours. The addition of germinants with either antibiotic did not result in significant toxin A or B production, which were below the limit of detection (<1.25 ng/mL) by 48 hours. Limiting the number of spores present in patient GI tracts at the end of therapy may be effective at preventing recurrent CDI and limiting spore shedding in the healthcare environment. These results with germinants warrant safety and efficacy evaluations in animal models.

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Omadacycline against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasing globally. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus complex are the most frequently encountered NTM, and oral treatment options are extremely limited for these pathogens, especially for the M. abscessus complex. In this study, the in vitro potency of omadacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, was tested against 111 isolates of NTM. MIC testing was performed as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute against 70 isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM), of which >90% were tetracycline resistant. These included M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (20 isolates), M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (3), Mycobacterium chelonae (15 isolates), Mycobacterium immunogenum (7 isolates), the Mycobacterium fortuitum group, including six doxycycline-resistant isolates (12 isolates), and the Mycobacterium mucogenicum group, including four doxycycline-resistant isolates (10 isolates). Forty-one isolates of slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM), including 16 isolates of MAC, were also tested. Omadacycline was active against all RGM species, with MIC₅₀ ranges of 0.004 to 0.25 and 0.06 to 1 μg/ml for 80% and 100% inhibition, respectively. For M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, MIC₅₀s were 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml with 80% and 100% inhibition, respectively. There was considerable trailing of the omadacycline endpoint with the RGM. MICs of tigecycline exhibited no trailing and were generally within 1 to 2 dilutions of the 100% inhibition omadacycline MICs. While there was no trailing observed in SGM, omadacycline MICs were higher (MIC range, 8 to >16 μg/ml; n = 41), as previously noted with tigecycline. This study supports further research of omadacycline, including clinical trials, for the treatment of RGM infections, especially M. abscessus.

Preliminary, Real-world, Multicenter Experience With Omadacycline for Mycobacterium abscessus Infections

Twelve patients were treated with omadacycline (OMC) as part of a multidrug regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus. The majority of infections were of pulmonary origin (7/12; 58.3%). The median (interquartile range) duration of OMC was 6.2 (4.2-11.0) months. Clinical success occurred in 9/12 (75.0%) patients. Three patients experienced a possible adverse effect while on therapy.