Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteremic vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium to eravacycline, omadacycline, lipoglycopeptides, and other comparator antibiotics: Results from the 2019-2020 Nationwide Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART)

Antimicrobial activity of eravacycline and other comparative agents on aerobic and anaerobic bacterial pathogens in Taiwan: A clinical microbiological study

OBJECTIVES

Eravacycline, a new tetracycline derivative, exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial susceptibility. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate in vitro activities of eravacycline, tigecycline, and ertapenem against various Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method. The following bacterial species were collected: vancomycin-sensitive (VS) Enterococci species, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci species (VRE), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus anginosus, Bacteroides species, Clostridioides difficile, Clostridium innocuum, Clostridium perfringens, Parabacteroides distasonis, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

RESULTS

We found that eravacycline exhibited superior in vitro activity compared to tigecycline and ertapenem. Notably, it exhibited the lowest MIC90 for several bacterial species, including VS E. faecalis (0.12 µg/mL), VS E. faecium (0.12 µg/mL), and others. Besides, VRE was susceptible to eravacycline (MIC90:0.12 µg/mL) and tigecycline (MIC90:0.12 µg/mL), but was all resistant to ertapenem (MIC90 > 64 µg/mL). S. aureus was also susceptible to eravacycline (MIC90:0.5 µg/mL) as well as tigecycline (MIC90:1.0 µg/mL). Furthermore, S. anginosus showed higher susceptibility to eravacycline (MIC90:2.0 µg/mL) and tigecycline (MIC90:4.0 µg/mL), but lower to ertapenem (MIC90:32.0 µg/mL). Eravacycline and tigecycline also demonstrated good susceptibility to anaerobes, including Bacteroides species (susceptibility rate: 100%), P. distasonis (100%), C. difficile (94.1‒100%), C. innocuum (94.1‒96.1%), and C. perfringens (88.9‒96.3%). For S. maltophilia, both tigecycline and eravacycline showed an MIC90 of 2 µg/mL. A moderate-to-strong correlation (rho = 0.608-0.804, P < 0.001) was noted between the MIC values of eravacycline and tigecycline against various bacterial species.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the potential of eravacycline as an effective treatment option for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Endocarditis Complicated by Splenic Infarction and Embolic Stroke

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The risk factors for IE include underlying heart disease, intravenous drug use, cardiac surgery, and interventional procedures. Enterococci are a common cause of IE, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections are becoming increasingly prevalent. In this report, we present the case of an 88-year-old female patient with multiple cardiac comorbidities who developed VRE endocarditis with splenic infarction and embolic stroke. The patient was successfully treated with a combination of antibiotics and anticoagulation therapy. This report highlights the importance of recognizing the potential complications of VRE endocarditis and the need for appropriate management to prevent adverse outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, only one other case of VRE endocarditis with multiple systemic complications has been documented so far.

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of ETEST Eravacycline for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci

Eravacycline (ERV) (brand name Xerava [Tetraphase]) is a new tetracycline-class antibacterial that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). ETEST is a gradient diffusion method that represents a simple alternative to the broth microdilution (BMD) method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new ETEST ERV (bioMérieux) in comparison with BMD was conducted following FDA and International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations, using FDA- and EUCAST-defined breakpoints. Clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 542) and Enterococcus spp. (n = 137) were included. Based on the BMD reference method, 92 Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 9 enterococcal isolates were nonsusceptible to ERV according to the FDA breakpoints, while 7 Escherichia coli isolates and 3 Enterococcus sp. isolates were classified as ERV resistant according the EUCAST breakpoints. Referring to FDA performance criteria, the ETEST ERV demonstrated 99.4% and 100.0% essential agreement (EA), 98.0% and 94.9% categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME) rates of 5.4% and 33.33%, and major error (ME) rates of 1.3% and 3.1% with clinical and challenge isolates, respectively, of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus spp. According to EUCAST breakpoints, E. coli and Enterococcus sp. isolate results also met ISO acceptance criteria for EA and CA (EA of 99.0% and 100.0%, respectively, and CA of 100.0% for both), without any VMEs or MEs. In conclusion, we report that ETEST ERV represents an accurate tool for performing ERV AST of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus sp. isolates.

Molecular epidemiology of bacteraemic vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates and in vitro activities of SC5005 and other comparators against these isolates collected from a medical centre in northern Taiwan, 2019-2020

OBJECTIVES

The global prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) highlights the need for new anti-enterococcal agents. Here, we assessed the molecular epidemiology of clinical VREfm bacteraemic isolates from a medical centre in northern Taiwan in 2019-2020 and to evaluate their susceptibility to last-line antibiotics and a new antimicrobial agent, SC5005.

METHODS

The molecular epidemiology of VREfm was investigated using van genotyping, MLST and PFGE. The susceptibilities of VREfm strains to antibiotics and SC5005 were determined using the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. The capability of E. faecium to develop resistance to antibiotics and SC5005 was evaluated using frequency of resistance and multipassage resistance assays. The mode of action of SC5005 was assessed by time-kill, bacterial membrane integrity and membrane potential assays.

RESULTS

All 262 VREfm isolates harboured vanA gene, and the most prevalent sequence type was ST17 (51%, n = 134, 84 pulsotypes), followed by ST78 (25%, n = 65, 54 pulsotypes). Additionally, we identified four new STs (ST2101, ST2102, ST2135 and ST2136) and observed the arrival of multidrug-resistant ST1885 in Taiwan. Moreover, SC5005 was effective against all VREfm isolates, including those non-susceptible to last-line antibiotics. SC5005 can disrupt and depolarize the bacterial membrane to kill E. faecium without detectable resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide insights into the latest epidemiology and resistance profiles of bacteraemic-causing VREfm in northern Taiwan. Additionally, SC5005 has the potential for development as a new therapeutic to treat VREfm infections.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Enterococci

Enterococci are major, recalcitrant nosocomial pathogens with a wide repertoire of intrinsic and acquired resistance determinants and the potential of developing resistance to all clinically available antimicrobials. As such, multidrug-resistant enterococci are considered a serious public health threat. Due to limited treatment options and rapid emergence of resistance to all novel agents, the clinical microbiology laboratory plays a critical role in deploying accurate, reproducible, and feasible antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to guide appropriate treatment of patients with deep-seated enterococcal infections. In this review, we provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of existing manual and automated methods that test susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, lipoglycopeptides, oxazolidinones, novel tetracycline-derivatives, and daptomycin. We also identify unique problems and gaps with the performance and clinical utility of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for enterococci, provide recommendations for clinical laboratories to circumvent select problems, and address potential future innovations that can bridge major gaps in susceptibility testing.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid

Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with high potency against Gram-positive bacteria and currently prescribed in bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. The aim of the review was to summarize and critically review the key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of tedizolid. Tedizolid displays linear pharmacokinetics with good tissue penetration. In in vitro susceptibility studies, tedizolid exhibits activity against the majority of Gram-positive bacteria (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] of ≤ 0.5 mg/L), is four-fold more potent than linezolid, and has the potential to treat pathogens being less susceptible to linezolid. Area under the unbound concentration–time curve (fAUC) related to MIC (fAUC/MIC) was best correlated with efficacy. In neutropenic mice, fAUC/MIC of ~ 50 and ~ 20 induced bacteriostasis in thigh and pulmonary infection models, respectively, at 24 h. The presence of granulocytes augmented its antibacterial effect. Hence, tedizolid is currently not recommended for immunocompromised patients. Clinical investigations with daily doses of 200 mg for 6 days showed non-inferiority to twice-daily dosing of linezolid 600 mg for 10 days in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. In addition to its use in skin and skin-structure infections, the high pulmonary penetration makes it an attractive option for respiratory infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Resistance against tedizolid is rare yet effective antimicrobial surveillance and defining pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for resistance suppression are needed to guide dosing strategies to suppress resistance development.

Importance of daptomycin dosage on the clinical outcome in liver transplant recipients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection

We retrospectively studied 16 (3 colonization and 13 infections) early post-liver transplant (≤60-day after transplantation) patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization/infection from 2016 to 2019. All VRE isolates were Enterococcus faecium. Of 13 patients with VRE infection, 12 (92.3%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation and 1 underwent deceased donor liver transplantation. Among these 13 patients, the median time from transplant to emergence of VRE infection was 12 days. The median interval from VRE infection to death was 27 days. Of these 13 patients, eleven patients (8 survived; 3 died) received daptomycin therapy for VRE. Among them, 4 (36.3%) received daptomycin doses <8 mg/kg. Non-survivors (n = 3) received significantly lower daptomycin dose than survivors (n = 8; p = .040). Daptomycin doses <8mg/kg were more frequently associated with non-survivors (n = 3) than with survivors (n = 8; p = .024). In summary, the suboptimal dosage of daptomycin may have contributed to a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. Doses ≥8 mg/kg may be needed to adequately treat VRE infection in liver transplant recipients.

Comparison of Etest and broth microdilution for evaluating the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to ceftaroline and of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam

OBJECTIVES

Decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftaroline (CPT) has been reported during antimicrobial resistance surveillance and therapy. Conventional laboratories are unable to provide timely susceptibility testing for CZA and CPT because these antimicrobial agents are not incorporated in automated susceptibility testing systems.

METHODS

We evaluated Etest and the Sensititre broth microdilution (BMD) method for testing CZA against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and CPT against important Gram-positive cocci bloodstream isolates. Genotypes of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales were also determined using the Xpert® Carba-R assay.

RESULTS

Etest showed ≥90% agreement with Sensititre BMD for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (n = 187), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) (n = 28) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35); however, the very major error rate exceeded 3%. Agreement between Etest and Sensititre BMD was <90% for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) (n = 81), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n = 92) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 170). Both agents remained potent with a high susceptibility rate by Sensititre BMD as follows: CZA against CRKP (95.0%), CREC (89.3%) and CRPA (84.5%); and CPT against MSSA (100.0%), MRSA (95.3%) and S. pneumoniae (94.3%). CZA was active against blaKPC-carrying CRKP (98.5% susceptible), and resistance in the majority of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales isolates (6 of 10 CRKP and 2 of 3 CREC) was due to the presence of a metallo-β-lactamase gene.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that interpretation of susceptibility results obtained by Etest for both agents should be undertaken cautiously and remains challenging.