In vitro development of imipenem/relebactam resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae involves multiple mutations including OmpK36 disruption and KPC modification

Multiple mechanisms mediate aztreonam-avibactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: driven by KPC-2 and OmpK36 mutations

Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a promising β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with an antimicrobial spectrum covering serine carbapenemase- or metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Although ATM-AVI has not been widely used in clinical practice, resistance to it in Escherichia coli has been widely reported. In this study, we investigated an ATM-AVI-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain, designated as 1705R, derived from K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705 by induction, with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 128 μg/mL. The 1705R strain contained two copies of the blaKPC-2 variant, which encodes for a K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variant with a Ser109Pro substitution, as well as a premature termination in OmpK36 and OmpK35 porins. This KPC variant decreased susceptibility to ATM-AVI by four-fold and demonstrated a reduced affinity for ATM and AVI in molecular docking analysis. In porin-deficient strains harbouring this KPC variant, ATM-AVI susceptibility was further diminished, exhibiting a 32-fold reduction. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the transposition of Tn4401 carrying blaKPC from the IncFIB/FIIK plasmid into the ColRNAI plasmid produced a second copy of blaKPC. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed that the copy number of blaKPC and its carrier plasmid increased, which significantly up-regulated their mRNA expression. Overexpression of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump may also be associated with high levels of ATM-AVI resistance. Furthermore, collateral susceptibility and costs of growth and biofilm formation developed after the acquisition of ATM-AVI resistance. This study demonstrates that multiple molecular mechanisms collectively contribute to ATM-AVI resistance in K. pneumoniae 1705R strain, which may represent a mode of resistance to ATM-AVI.

Mutant prevention concentrations, in vitro resistance evolution dynamics, and mechanisms of resistance to imipenem and imipenem/relebactam in carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates showing ceftazidime/avibactam resistance

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants selected during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment usually develop susceptibility to carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem and imipenem/relebactam. We analyzed imipenem and imipenem/relebactam single-step mutant frequencies, resistance development trajectories and differentially selected resistance mechanisms using two representative K. pneumoniae isolates that had developed ceftazidime/avibactam resistance during therapy (ST512/KPC-31 and ST258/KPC-35). Mutant frequencies and mutant prevention concentrations were measured in Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing incremental concentrations of imipenem or imipenem/relebactam. Resistance dynamics were determined after incubation for 7 days in 10 mL MH tubes containing incremental concentrations of each antibiotic or combination, up to 64 times their baseline MIC. Two colonies per strain from each experiment were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing. The impact of KPC variants identified in resistant mutants on β-lactam resistance was investigated by cloning experiments. Imipenem/relebactam suppressed the emergence of resistant mutants at lower concentrations than imipenem, slowed down resistance development for both strains, and the resulting mutants yielded lower MICs of carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors than those selected with imipenem alone. Characterization of resistant mutants revealed that imipenem resistance was mainly caused by inactivation of OmpK36 and mutations in the KPC β-lactamase. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant mutants also maintained OmpK36 alterations, but mutations in KPC were much less frequent compared with those selected with imipenem alone. Genetic and biochemical characterization of the KPC derivatives identified in the resistant mutants confirmed their role in carbapenem resistance. Our data positions imipenem/relebactam as an attractive therapeutic option for combating ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections.

In vivo emergence of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam through modification of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase in Klebsiella aerogenes

We describe the in vivo emergence of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam via modification of AmpC in a clinical Klebsiella aerogenes isolate during therapy with this combination. Paired ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible/resistant isolates were obtained before and during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment. Whole genome sequencing revealed a differential mutation in AmpC (R148W) in the ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolate. Molecular cloning and structural studies confirmed the impact of this substitution, which affects the architecture of the H10 helix, on the evolved resistant phenotype.

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

Hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A global public health threat

The evolution of hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae can be categorized into three main patterns: the evolution of KL1/KL2-hvKp strains into CR-hvKp, the evolution of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKp) strains into hv-CRKp, and the acquisition of hybrid plasmids carrying carbapenem resistance and virulence genes by classical K. pneumoniae (cKp). These strains are characterized by multi-drug resistance, high virulence, and high infectivity. Currently, there are no effective methods for treating and surveillance this pathogen. In addition, the continuous horizontal transfer and clonal spread of these bacteria under the pressure of hospital antibiotics have led to the emergence of more drug-resistant strains. This review discusses the evolution and distribution characteristics of hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance and hypervirulence, risk factors for susceptibility, infection syndromes, treatment regimens, real-time surveillance and preventive control measures. It also outlines the resistance mechanisms of antimicrobial drugs used to treat this pathogen, providing insights for developing new drugs, combination therapies, and a "One Health" approach. Narrowing the scope of surveillance but intensifying implementation efforts is a viable solution. Monitoring of strains can be focused primarily on hospitals and urban wastewater treatment plants.

Reversion of KPC-114 to KPC-2 in ceftazidime-avibactam- resistant/meropenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 is related to low mutation rates

Klebsiella pneumoniae strains that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) variants displaying resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) often remain susceptible to meropenem (MEM), suggesting a potential therapeutic use of this carbapenem antibiotic. However, in vitro studies indicate that these sorts of strains can mutate becoming MEM-resistant, raising concerns about the effectiveness of carbapenems as treatment option. We have studied mutation rates occurring from the reversion of MEM-susceptible KPC-114 to MEM-resistant KPC-2, in CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae belonging to ST11. Two-step fluctuation assays (FAs) were conducted. In brief, initial cultures of KPC-114-producing K. pneumoniae showing 1 µg/mL MEM MIC were spread on Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing 2-8 µg/mL MEM. A second step of FA, at 4-16 µg/mL MEM was performed from a mutant colony obtained at 2 µg/mL MEM. Mutation rates were calculated using maximum likelihood estimation. Parental and mutant strains were sequenced by Illumina NextSeq, and mutations were predicted by variant-calling analysis. At 8 µg/mL MEM, mutants derived from parental CZA-resistant (MIC ≥ 64 µg/mL)/MEM-susceptible (MIC = 1 µg/mL) KPC-114-positive K. pneumoniae exhibited an accumulative mutation rate of 3.05 × 10-19 mutations/cell/generation, whereas at 16 µg/mL MEM an accumulative mutation rate of 1.33 × 10-19 mutations/cell/generation resulted in the reversion of KPC-114 (S181_P182 deletion) to KPC-2. These findings highlight that the reversion of MEM-susceptible KPC-114 to MEM-resistant KPC-2, in CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae ST11 is related to low mutation rates suggesting a low risk of therapeutic failure. In vivo investigations are necessary to confirm the clinical potential of MEM against CZA-resistant KPC variants.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major concern due to the limited therapeutic options. Strikingly, KPC mutations mediating CZA resistance are generally associated with meropenem susceptibility, suggesting a potential therapeutic use of this carbapenem antibiotic. However, the reversion of meropenem-susceptible to meropenem-resistant could be expected. Therefore, knowing the mutation rate related to this genetic event is essential to estimate the potential use of meropenem against CZA-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. In this study, we demonstrate, in vitro, that under high concentrations of meropenem, reversion of KPC-114 to KPC-2 in CZA-resistant/meropenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae belonging to the global high-risk ST11 is related to low mutation rates.

Impact of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms and transferable β-lactamases on the activity of cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the stability of the newly developed β-lactams (cefiderocol) and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/xeruborbactam) against the most clinically relevant mechanisms of mutational and transferable β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

We screened a collection of 61 P. aeruginosa PAO1 derivatives. Eighteen isolates displayed the most relevant mechanisms of mutational resistance to β-lactams. The other 43 constructs expressed transferable β-lactamases from genes cloned in pUCP-24. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol and imipenem/relebactam exhibited excellent in vitro activity against all of the mutational resistance mechanisms studied. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/xeruborbactam proved to be more vulnerable to mutational events, especially to overexpression of efflux operons. The agents exhibiting the widest spectrum of activity against transferable β-lactamases were aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/zidebactam, followed by cefepime/taniborbactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam. However, some MBLs, particularly NDM enzymes, may affect their activity. Combined production of certain enzymes (e.g. NDM-1) with increased MexAB-OprM-mediated efflux and OprD deficiency results in resistance to almost all agents tested, including last options such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations show promising and complementary in vitro activity against mutational and transferable P. aeruginosa β-lactam resistance. However, the combined effects of efflux pumps, OprD deficiency and efficient β-lactamases could still result in the loss of all therapeutic options. Resistance surveillance, judicious use of new agents and continued drug development efforts are encouraged.

Complex evolutionary trajectories in vivo of two novel KPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam resistance

More and more ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae have been reported with its widespread use, and the detection rate of KPC variants has increased dramatically. However, the evolutionary mechanism and fitness effects during KPC mutation remained unknown. Here, we report the complex in vivo evolutionary trajectories of two novel KPC variants, KPC-155 (L169P/GT242A) and KPC-185 (D179Y/GT242A), from K. pneumoniae in the same patient. The novel variants were shown to confer ceftazidime-avibactam resistance but restore carbapenem susceptibility based on the results of plasmid transformation assays, cloning experiments, and enzyme kinetic measurements. In vitro, competition experiments highlighted the adaptive advantage conferred by strains carrying these KPC variants, which could lead to the rapid spread of these ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. The growth curve indicated that blaKPC-185 had better growth conditions at lower avibactam concentration compared to blaKPC-155, which was consistent with ceftazidime-avibactam use in vivo. In addition, replicative transposition of the IS26-flanked translocatable unit (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26) also contributes to the blaKPC amplification and formation of two copies (blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-185), conferring both carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. However, strains with double copies showed reduced competitive advantage and configuration stability. The comparative plasmid analysis of IS26 group (IS26-blaKPC-IS26) and Tn1721 group (Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26) revealed that IS26-insertion could influence the distribution of resistance genes and ability of self-conjugation. The dynamic changes in blaKPC configuration highlight the need for consistent monitoring including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of blaKPC subtypes - during clinical treatment, especially when ceftazidime-avibactam is administered.

In Vitro Resistance-Predicting Studies and In Vitro Resistance-Related Parameters-A Hit-to-Lead Perspective

Despite the urgent need for new antibiotics, very few innovative antibiotics have recently entered clinics or clinical trials. To provide a constant supply of new drug candidates optimized in terms of their potential to select for resistance in natural settings, in vitro resistance-predicting studies need to be improved and scaled up. In this review, the following in vitro parameters are presented: frequency of spontaneous mutant selection (FSMS), mutant prevention concentration (MPC), dominant mutant prevention concentration (MPC-D), inferior-mutant prevention concentration (MPC-F), and minimal selective concentration (MSC). The utility of various adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) approaches (serial transfer, continuous culture, and evolution in spatiotemporal microenvironments) for comparing hits in terms of the level and time required for multistep resistance to emerge is discussed. We also consider how the hit-to-lead stage can benefit from high-throughput ALE setups based on robotic workstations, do-it-yourself (DIY) continuous cultivation systems, microbial evolution and growth arena (MEGA) plates, soft agar gradient evolution (SAGE) plates, microfluidic chips, or microdroplet technology. Finally, approaches for evaluating the fitness of in vitro-generated resistant mutants are presented. This review aims to draw attention to newly emerged ideas on how to improve the in vitro forecasting of the potential of compounds to select for resistance in natural settings.

Activity of cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against isogenic strains of Escherichia coli expressing single and double β-lactamases under high and low permeability conditions

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the impact of the most clinically relevant β-lactamases and their interplay with low outer membrane permeability on the activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam against recombinant Escherichia coli strains.

METHODS

We constructed 82 E. coli laboratory transformants expressing the main β-lactamases circulating in Enterobacterales (70 expressing single β-lactamase and 12 producing double carbapenemase) under high (E. coli TG1) and low (E. coli HB4) permeability conditions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by reference broth microdilution.

RESULTS

Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam were active against all E. coli TG1 transformants. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/enmetazobactam were also highly active, but unstable against most of MBL-producing transformants. Combination of β-lactamases with porin deficiency (E. coli HB4) did not significantly affect the activity of aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol or meropenem/nacubactam, but limited the effectiveness of the rest of carbapenem- and cefepime-based combinations. Double-carbapenemase production resulted in the loss of activity of most of the compounds tested, an effect particularly evident for those E. coli HB4 transformants in which MBLs were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the promising activity that cefiderocol and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors have against recombinant E. coli strains expressing widespread β-lactamases, including when these are combined with low permeability or other enzymes. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, cefepime/zidebactam and meropenem/nacubactam will help to mitigate to some extent the urgency of new compounds able to resist MBL action, although NDM enzymes represent a growing challenge against which drug development efforts are still needed.

Drug Discovery in the Field of β-Lactams: An Academic Perspective

β-Lactams are the most widely prescribed class of antibiotics that inhibit penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), particularly transpeptidases that function in peptidoglycan synthesis. A major mechanism of antibiotic resistance is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which are capable of hydrolyzing β-lactam antibiotics. There have been many efforts to counter increasing bacterial resistance against β-lactams. These studies have mainly focused on three areas: discovering novel inhibitors against β-lactamases, developing new β-lactams less susceptible to existing resistance mechanisms, and identifying non-β-lactam inhibitors against cell wall transpeptidases. Drug discovery in the β-lactam field has afforded a range of research opportunities for academia. In this review, we summarize the recent new findings on both β-lactamases and cell wall transpeptidases because these two groups of enzymes are evolutionarily and functionally connected. Many efforts to develop new β-lactams have aimed to inhibit both transpeptidases and β-lactamases, while several promising novel β-lactamase inhibitors have shown the potential to be further developed into transpeptidase inhibitors. In addition, the drug discovery progress against each group of enzymes is presented in three aspects: understanding the targets, screening methodology, and new inhibitor chemotypes. This is to offer insights into not only the advancement in this field but also the challenges, opportunities, and resources for future research. In particular, cyclic boronate compounds are now capable of inhibiting all classes of β-lactamases, while the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) series of small molecules has led to not only new β-lactamase inhibitors but potentially a new class of antibiotics by directly targeting PBPs. With the cautiously optimistic successes of a number of new β-lactamase inhibitor chemotypes and many questions remaining to be answered about the structure and function of cell wall transpeptidases, non-β-lactam transpeptidase inhibitors may usher in the next exciting phase of drug discovery in this field.